April 30, 2009
— LauraW And the best way to challenge authority is to be lavishly feted at friendly 'off the record' meals, of course.
For more than a year, David Bradley, the Atlantic's soft-spoken owner, has hosted these off-the-record dinners at a specially built table in his glass-enclosed office overlooking the Potomac. And the guests, from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to Jordan's King Abdullah II, are as A-list as they come."It's just a joy for me," Bradley says. "These are reflective, considered conversations, which is hard to do when you're going after headlines for the next day's publication." While the guests seem quite open, says the businessman who bought Atlantic a decade ago, he is new enough to journalism "that I can't tell the difference between genuine candor and deeply rehearsed candor."
Emanuel says he enjoyed the chance to "put aside the adversarial. . . . I tried to be honest and frank and hope they felt that way. They want context, they want thinking. You're not selling, you're presenting."
No, you're definitely selling. Because they're buying. Everything.
Folks, please read the whole thing. It's disgusting.
From slublog:
Remember the days when a conservative reporter showing up and asking a question at the White House was cause for major freakout among the left?GANNON!
Precisely. ONE single sympathetic question to a Republican President caused a furor.
Now, imagine George W. Bush looking out during a press conference and seeing a sea of Gannons willing to craft creampuff after creampuff for the President to swat out of the park.
And that his appointees meet with these Gannons at luxe private dinners, and establish a private website (like Journolist) where they can discuss their scary-smart ideas with a gaggle of sympathetic Gannons.
These Gannons, in order to preserve their 'special access,' will not commit the atrocity of holding these officials to their word in public.
That's pretty much what's going on, yes?
May I ask what purpose this special access serves if it does not inform the public?
It's much like CNN having special access in Iraq before the war, but only using it to report what their handlers allowed them to see. That's not really access, of course. It's merely some variety of whoredom to power. What good is being a witness if you never testify?
Special access is prized by the press, because they get to feel Very Important, a friend of the elite, a member of the club. They get to hear and treasure tasty little secrets and exclusive details, as long as they can keep their mouths shut.
And granting special access is prized by government elites, because they get to transform annoying reporters into friendly little sockpuppets.
Posted by: LauraW at
06:41 AM
| Comments (109)
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
More. Without access, they aren't qualified to write ad copy for a shoe store, much less manage one.
Stenographers all.
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 06:46 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: rplat at April 30, 2009 06:49 AM (G1ArL)
Posted by: Jollyroger at April 30, 2009 06:51 AM (+tHhv)
Posted by: alexthechick at April 30, 2009 06:51 AM (SHHaV)
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 30, 2009 06:53 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: outraged at April 30, 2009 06:54 AM (penCf)
I wonder what Eric "the media is right-wing" Alterman would think about this. These media clowns are petty and pathetic, and their justification for fellating Obama is weak.
In the end, there will be only... Obama acolytes in the media.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at April 30, 2009 06:55 AM (9hSKh)
Well, this is, of course, why blogs are so important now. And why it is important for blogs to WANT to get things right and not just vent. There is no real analysis by professional journalists anymore, because they want to keept their careers and going against the thugocracy will put that at risk.
As I said earlier: I am experiencing major contempt fatigue. I am sure that soon I will start learning to love da bomb.
Posted by: doug at April 30, 2009 06:55 AM (dNitG)
Posted by: SGT Dan at April 30, 2009 06:57 AM (/KqGF)
Truth to power -> Power is truth
Comfort the afflicted, Afflict the comfortable -> Comfort the arrogant, and irrigate the comfortable.
Power to the People -> Power to the better People.
Posted by: Chimney Sweep #8 at April 30, 2009 06:57 AM (kIjlp)
Posted by: Mr. Enchanted at April 30, 2009 07:02 AM (7DB+a)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 30, 2009 07:05 AM (NM1Nu)
GANNON!"
The guy was a fucking gay prostitute and not even a real journalist for God's sake.
That's what the uproar was about.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:06 AM (hOPQH)
Can we start filing frivolous lawsuits?
This is much more a waste of time and resources of our public servant (the POTUS) than anything Gov. Palin has done.
Posted by: connertown at April 30, 2009 07:11 AM (lhJxs)
Hey, this guy's funny. "Real journalist." That's good stuff!
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 07:12 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 30, 2009 07:13 AM (NM1Nu)
Posted by: Iron Maiden at April 30, 2009 07:16 AM (wgLRl)
HAHAHAHA!!!!
Wow, you just can't make up something funnier than that.
Your brain, it doesn't work right.
Posted by: mesablue at April 30, 2009 07:16 AM (5yNaE)
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 30, 2009 07:17 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: Dr. Manhattan at April 30, 2009 07:19 AM (OkrJ4)
Laura; surely you know that the ONLY time you have an opposition press is when the Republicans are in charge.
We havent had an honest presss at least since 1968 when the lying sack of liberal shit Walter Chronkite made his famous statement about the Tet Offensive AND that was a Democrap president!
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 07:20 AM (f6os6)
The guy was a fucking gay prostitute and not even a real journalist for God's sake.
So is Andrew Sullivan. What's your point?
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 07:23 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 07:23 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 30, 2009
That, is a question I'd love to know the answer to.
Who, obviously someone in the White House due to Gannon's many visits, was partaking anal pleasure with Gannon?
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:24 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: Good Lt. at April 30, 2009 07:25 AM (jH17H)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 07:26 AM (9bJJQ)
The guy was a fucking gay prostitute and not even a real journalist for God's sake.
So is Andrew Sullivan. What's your point?
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009My point is gay hookers who aren't journalists and work for fake News organizations have no business being part of the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
Is that clear enough for ya?
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:26 AM (hOPQH)
Uhmm, HC, no. Not real clear....Oh wait, not taking q's from the #1 rated network (Fox) is OK?
Fuck you.
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 07:28 AM (9bJJQ)
I've talked to two people who watch a ton of tv and are liberals and they had no idea about the AFO flyover.
Not a fuckin clue.
These sick fucks in the media are pathetic.
Posted by: Rev. Dr. E. Buzz Miller at April 30, 2009 07:29 AM (FPYe+)
Posted by: Dagny Tagert at April 30, 2009 07:30 AM (MmE3n)
Is that clear enough for ya?
But stacking the White House Press pool with folks from HuffPo is all about objectivity, right?
Right?
And why do you hate gays?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 07:31 AM (/R8R8)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 07:33 AM (9bJJQ)
Another form of this behavior can be seen in security policies and distribution of need-to-know. It is an ego boost for some wonks to be in-the-know for shit they don't really need-to-know. Make them feel wise or something.
Pentagon has used it for years to "manage" Hill staffers and by the services to manage the building.
It really shocks some of them when you refuse proffered access.
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 07:34 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 07:34 AM (9bJJQ)
Like MSNBC? And, who the fuck does Helen Thomas even work for now? Yet, there she sits in the front row.
Your tunnel vision is just amazing.
Posted by: mesablue at April 30, 2009 07:36 AM (5yNaE)
I'd like to get outraged over this but it's so blatant that it's hard to get worked up over.
Another example, Jennifer Loven. Not only does she slobber over Obama daily, she is always one of if not the first reporter Obama calls on in his press conferences, just like he did last night.
She also happens to be married to Roger Ballentine, one of the green warriors who stands to make a fortune from Obama's greening of America. But this is good, not something nefarious like Halliburton/Hitler.
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 07:40 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
I've got nothing against gays.
I just believe that gay hookers who aren't journalists and work for fake News organizations have no business being part of the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:43 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: Rich Fader at April 30, 2009 07:44 AM (PA/oP)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 07:46 AM (/R8R8)
Fuck you.
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009What in the fuck does not taking q's from Fox have to do with Bush having a gay hooker who wasn't a journalist and worked for a fake News organization being part of the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
And Fuck you too.
Oh, and you are a moron to believe the two events have anything to do with one another.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:46 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
Good question. I'd think either one would have disqualified him. You know the party of family values and all.
Which is worse I don't know.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 07:49 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 07:54 AM (/R8R8)
I would like to see a list of the attendees at these dinners, and have that list published and widely available on the web. Then anytime we reference anything one of them says or writes, we should precede their name with an asterisk.
Just like Barry Bonds' achievements will forever be asterisked, the utterances of these "journalists" should be forever marked as suspect by virtue of their unethical conduct.
Posted by: sherlock at April 30, 2009 07:54 AM (cq3pU)
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 07:56 AM (z4es9)
How closely do you think it correlates with the membership of "journo-list?"
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 07:58 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
What in the fuck are you talking about? The content of the question and the response might be important, it might not. That has nothing to do with it.
The point is gay hookers who aren't journalists and work for fake News organizations have no business being part of the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
Good fucking grief.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:01 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 08:04 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at April 30, 2009 08:04 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: dumb_blonde at April 30, 2009 08:05 AM (9rdxF)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at April 30, 2009 08:06 AM (ZPwZl)
How closely do you think it correlates with the membership of "journo-list?"
Okay, maybe we're gonna need a bigger set of special symbols... I assume we haven't found out all of the "special" lists and meetings. And I think the two lists would match up pretty well.
We often feel powerless to expose these hypocrites, but I think the asterisk idea would be a powerful tool to reinforce the idea that we recognize their perfidy, and aren't about to forget about it.
Posted by: sherlock at April 30, 2009 08:07 AM (cq3pU)
Posted by: buzzion at April 30, 2009 08:09 AM (Lrsi6)
As for fake news organizations, again, where's your outrage at HuffPo sitting in and asking questions? Or is their guy a "real" journalist?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 08:09 AM (/R8R8)
Posted by: Honest Clod News Service at April 30, 2009 08:11 AM (VW9/y)
The hooker part. It's against the law. See Eliot Spitzer.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:16 AM (hOPQH)
Two very simple questions for honest cloud -
What criteria make a journalist "real"?
What criteria make a news organization "real"?
Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 30, 2009 08:16 AM (ACDor)
The point is gay hookers who aren't journalists and work for fake News organizations have no business being part of the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
To repeat what Dr. Manhattan said, does that doofus who asked the POTUS what "enchanted" him most about his first hundred days in office have any business being part of the White House press pool?
What is it, exactly, that makes that particular schmuck a "real journalist" ?
It's not exactly like Gannon was the only one in the White House press corps smoking pole for a living, by the look of all the Presidential knob-polishing going on by this lot.
Posted by: Lewis at April 30, 2009 08:17 AM (Y3uPw)
BWAHAHAHA! Now Brad's doing it! I'm gonna lose a lung over here!
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 08:18 AM (z4es9)
Two very simple questions for honest cloud -
What criteria make a journalist "real"?
-Hate Republicans, love Democrats
What criteria make a news organization "real"?
-(See above)
Posted by: A TRULY HONEST cloud at April 30, 2009 08:19 AM (voIlD)
And why is it you, and only you, are qualified to pass judgment on who may or may not ask an elected official questions?
Can I ask a question? Can Ace? Again, why are you more upset over who is asking the question than you are about the substance or lack thereof of the question itself and the resultant answer?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 08:20 AM (/R8R8)
Two very simple questions for honest cloud -
What criteria make a journalist "real"?
-Hate Republicans, love Democrats
What criteria make a news organization "real"?
-(See above)
Posted by: A TRULY HONEST cloudNot this. This a fake News organization. And Gannon, working for them, was a fake journalist.
A virtual organization with no physical office space or newsroom, Talon News was owned by a conservative activist group called GOPUSA. Robert Eberle, the president and CEO of GOPUSA, held both titles for Talon News as well.
According to Media Matters, "Talon News apparently consists of little more than (Robert) Eberle, (Jeff) Gannon, and a few volunteers, and is virtually indistinguishable from GOPUSA.com.Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:23 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: Slublog at April 30, 2009 08:24 AM (8ffW/)
Oh, no, Honest Cloud. Attacking my gay friends like that. And I had thought that you were a heap kewl Native American, but you're a hater just like Rush.
;(
Posted by: meeeeghan mccain at April 30, 2009 08:24 AM (MGu62)
Besides, anybody asking about the president's most "enchanting" moment was more than likely wearing a sun dress and selling ass on the street not too long ago.
Posted by: sears poncho at April 30, 2009 08:24 AM (uj/0b)
If Republicans were to force deviants from the party we are homophobic.
If we let them stay we are somehow 'hypocritical'.
You just can't smell what you are shoveling can you?
You don't give two craps about family values, you follow that moral relativistic crap. I wonder what the Left's moral compass will be pointing at tomorrow?
Posted by: DavidM at April 30, 2009 08:24 AM (R/e5b)
At least Jake Tapper is man enough to go after Gibbs, at least until Gibbs takes down Jake Tapper over the Air Farce One controversy. [Hat tip five feet of fury blog.]
Posted by: andycanuck at April 30, 2009 08:26 AM (MGu62)
This post is very interesting, as Laura W makes many of the same points that Glenn Greenwald over at Salon makes-
namely, that the Beltway Journalists are alltogether too comfortable with access to power, and protecting themselves, instrad of challenging authority and seeking the truth.
Whether it is the Fox Channel with the Bush Administration or MSNBC with the Obama Administration, the media tend to be more protective of the government officials than interested in telling the truth to the American public.
An example would be the scandal of how the so-called "military analysts" that regularly make the rounds, presented as disinterested experts, are actually financially connected to the military contractors that benefit from the reporting they give. But not one word of this has been spoken by any reporter for any of the networks.
Posted by: ChipD at April 30, 2009 08:28 AM (nWYl8)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
The content or lack of content is a completely separate subject. If you'd like to ask about any specific question I'd be happy to answer.
My point here for the fifth time is that gay hookers who are fake journalists and work for fake news organizations shouldn't be in the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
It's just that simple.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:29 AM (hOPQH)
Oh, god! My athsma!!
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 08:29 AM (z4es9)
If we let them stay we are somehow 'hypocritical'.
Posted by: DavidM at April 30, 2009
I'll add you to the list of those too fucking stupid to understand my point.
That gay hookers who are fake journalists and work for fake news organizations shouldn't be in the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:32 AM (hOPQH)
61 According to Media Matters, "Talon News apparently consists of little more than (Robert) Eberle, (Jeff) Gannon, and a few volunteers, and is virtually indistinguishable from GOPUSA.com."
Irrelevent. The number of employees/volunteers of any organization doesn't make that organization "fake," nor does the opinon offered by some left-wing watchdog group (Media Matters) on the ideological make-up of the organization ("indistinguishable from GOPUSA.com") invalidate its credibility.
I once worked for a book publisher which consisted of three (count 'em -- 3) employees. I guess that means we were a "fake" company that churned out a host of "fake" books (including one by a Nobel Prize winner).
Posted by: Horseshit Detector Unit at April 30, 2009 08:33 AM (voIlD)
What standards does a "journalist" have to meet? Is there a market cap requirement for the parent organization? Does the "journalist" have to have a J-school masters, or will a BA/BS in Communications do?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 08:37 AM (/R8R8)
How do you do it, HC? How do you sustain such comic genius for such a long period of time? I must know!
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 08:37 AM (z4es9)
70 ...gay hookers who are fake journalists and work for fake news organizations shouldn't be in the White House press pool asking the POTUS questions.
You can keep repeating that mantra over and over again in order to get all the therapeutic use out of it that you can -- but until you answer the question of Why not? it's not an end argument in and of itself.
Posted by: Horseshit Detector Unit at April 30, 2009 08:38 AM (voIlD)
"The guy was a fucking gay prostitute and not even a real journalist for God's sake." -- "honest" cloud above
Barney Frank
The guy was a fucking gay prostitute's lover and not even a real legislator for God's sake.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at April 30, 2009 08:40 AM (fnU+z)
The President works for us, the people, anyone can ask him questions.
ANYONE
if ya can't figure that out you must be O-tarded
Posted by: Dave at April 30, 2009 08:43 AM (gI0fK)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 08:44 AM (1Jaio)
And why they went out of business immediately after Gannon was exposed as a fraud.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:44 AM (hOPQH)
honest cloud -
What makes a "real journalist" real, and what makes a fake one fake?
I mean, if I graduated from J-School and work for the New York Times, but ask the POTUS nothing but softball questions, should I be considered a "real" journalist?
Or are my credentials more important that my actions?
Posted by: Lewis at April 30, 2009 08:45 AM (Y3uPw)
The President works for us, the people, anyone can ask him questions.
ANYONE
if ya can't figure that out you must be O-tarded
Posted by: Dave at April 30, 2009 0You are one stupid fuck, Dave.
We are talking about the White House Press pool. You don't honestly believe anyone can just walk right in do you?
You couldn't that fucking dumb.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 08:46 AM (hOPQH)
You couldn't that fucking dumb.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 01:46 PM (hOPQH)
Unlike a genius like you, who crafts such fine sentences.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 08:49 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Dave at April 30, 2009 08:50 AM (gI0fK)
Well, not to concede he was a fraud, but I can tell you that they probably went out of business because they no longer had a unique product to sell. That's kinda how capitalism works...
And it appears you are cool with the White House denying access to news organizations for reasons of its own choosing. What if the White House were to banish the NYT for asking uncomfortable questions? Is that OK? Or does the NYT have to stick to asking about enchantment to maintain access?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 08:50 AM (/R8R8)
Posted by: Officer Paddy O'Irony de Blog at April 30, 2009 08:51 AM (fnU+z)
Posted by: nikkolai at April 30, 2009 08:51 AM (4EBUu)
Honest cloud -
I didn't ask why Gannon or Talon News are considered "fake". I asked what are the criteria an organization or journalist have to meet to be considered "real". Not that I expected an "honest" answer from you anyway.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 30, 2009 08:52 AM (ACDor)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at April 30, 2009 08:52 AM (fnU+z)
The trolls have taken us off topic, as planned. All I want is to make sure we "recognize" what journalists are cozy with the administration, in apparent violation of their own code of ethics. I don't give a rat's ass if some person impersonated a journalist to ask Bush a question... I am upset about the apparently systemic cosiness of today's journalists with the Obama adminstration. I am not required to be perfectly consistent across all time and all adminstrations in my concerns - this is here and this is now.
I want those asterisks!!
Posted by: sherlock at April 30, 2009 08:53 AM (cq3pU)
Wait. Is it not an elaborate comedy routine? Because this constant mention of "real" and "fake" journalists is hilarious however it's intended. I mean, it's like asking people if their dogs are made of "real carbon".
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 08:55 AM (z4es9)
The Quiet Man is now on my shit list for stealing my joke.
*shakes fist*
Damn you!
Posted by: Nom de Blog at April 30, 2009 01:52 PM (fnU+z)
Sorry, but it was such an easy shot at an easy target.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 08:56 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Javems at April 30, 2009 08:59 AM (hq71Y)
"41 so, is it the gay hooker part, or the fake news organization part that you don't like. Or does it have to be both?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
HC: Good question. I'd think either one would have disqualified him. You know the party of family values and all."
You brought it up shit-for-brains. Only an elistist prick like you would criticize who asked a question rather than the question itself.
Posted by: DavidM at April 30, 2009 09:01 AM (R/e5b)
Posted by: Edward Van Cullen at April 30, 2009 09:03 AM (f7A+e)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009
HC: Good question. I'd think either one would have disqualified him. You know the party of family values and all."
You brought it up shit-for-brains. Only an elistist prick like you would criticize who asked a question rather than the question itself.
Posted by: DavidM at April 30, 2009
What in the fuck are you talking about?
You DavidM, are a complete imbecile.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 09:05 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: DavidM at April 30, 2009 09:08 AM (R/e5b)
I have to disagree with you Sherlock, the post was about journalists being too cosy with the administration, but that is a subset of the groupthink within the media, and directly related to the Gannon affair.
Gannon was run out of the press pool because of his ideology, it had absolutely nothing to do with being a gay prostitute. Had he asked embarassing questions of Pres. Bush, he would most likely still be in the Whitehouse press pool today, none of the "real" journalists would have ever bothered to look into his background, and if they had learned of his past they would have considered it a non-issue. In fact he would have been supported and protected by his "journalist" colleagues if he had just stayed with the approved program.
The same thing would likely happen now to any small-time journalist who dared to ask Obama a tough question. The focus of the media would become vetting the journalist who went off mission, rather than the substance of any question.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 30, 2009 09:13 AM (ACDor)
Posted by: Honestly, I'm Plowed at April 30, 2009 09:16 AM (PMGbu)
Posted by: Jack is Back! at April 30, 2009 09:18 AM (qhHJJ)
Yes, DavidM, I think he is a bot, too, no human could be that dense. Maybe you would like to go to the Honest Cloud Golden Showers refillable troll dolls blog. You are always singing in the rain with Honest Cloud Golden Showers.
Posted by: Honest Cloud Golden Showers Inc. bot at April 30, 2009 09:33 AM (MGu62)
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 09:40 AM (/R8R8)
Posted by: Dirk at April 30, 2009 09:53 AM (QwbNF)
"But gay prostitutes are not real journalists..., and Joe the Plumber's first name wasn't Joe so anything Obama admitted to Joe is unimportant, and Miss America has fake boobs so everything she says is wrong" - Dumbshitlefty
Posted by: wooga at April 30, 2009 10:49 AM (2p0e3)
Posted by: Sam Adams at April 30, 2009 01:04 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Reiver at April 30, 2009 01:17 PM (BcsKu)
My parents taught me all I know.
Dad: You are a fucking moron...
Mother: You are a cretin and a disgrace to humanity...
Grandfather: What a queer little pantywaist....
Grandmother: Stop buggering the pigs....
That's why my comments are so unique and brillant. It was my unique upbringing and loving parents.
So, "Do you want fried with your order?"
Posted by: Honest Cloud at April 30, 2009 03:12 PM (0Qynq)
Posted by: steve at May 21, 2009 05:22 AM (D74YX)
Posted by: vennie34 at February 08, 2011 06:57 AM (bkhPq)
Posted by: Mercedes-Benz at June 02, 2011 09:32 PM (xJe3c)
Posted by: hublot at April 23, 2012 04:12 AM (jAY8C)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.
