April 30, 2009
— Ace America: Where powerful political leaders are protected by the Enchanted Media (TM), and ordinary citizens are "vetted."
Like we couldn't tell (see pic at link). And like most beauty pageant competitors haven't had some work.
So what warrants the special "vetting" of Miss California by the Enchanted Media? Gee, I have no idea.
In related news, Nancy Pelosi, aka Granny Rictus McBotoxImplants, has had no plastic surgery whatsoever.
Can the press make it any more obvious that if you cross them on their preferred politics and candidates, they're going to do everything in their power to harm you?
It's creepy. The press is, supposedly, neutral and independent, so their bad behavior should, in theory, not be particularly frightening.
But they are essentially acting as the bullies and secret police -- secret police as in blackmail and public revelation of embarrassing information, not backroom beatings -- of the government.
They're not actually part of the government. But they sure are acting as if they are the government's goon squad. And while the formal separation of government and media goons is there, in practice... well, the true lines between them seem increasingly obliterated.
Posted by: Ace at
08:53 AM
| Comments (125)
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 08:54 AM (/R8R8)
Having breast implants means that you have no right to criticize those who want to redefine marriage.
That's the point they're trying to make by reporting this, right? Cripes, the left wingers have some royally fucked up logic, don't they?
Posted by: Reggie1971 at April 30, 2009 08:56 AM (b68Df)
Posted by: Steve L. at April 30, 2009 08:59 AM (Gkhxf)
She is an enemy of the peoples and counter-revolutionary and must be destroyed.
And in case she's reading this and needs somewhere to hide out from this my place is always available.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 08:59 AM (1Jaio)
My pet theory for the mass exodus of Republicans to "Independent" status is that they do not want to be targeted for the gulag by the completely unfettered Democrat majority, their media spies and the Obama civil militia par-military arm.
Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at April 30, 2009 09:00 AM (AYVkM)
She openly admitted she believes gay people should be treated as second class citizens. If I was gay I'd be pretty pissed off about it.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 09:01 AM (hOPQH)
What's this about breasts? On this blog? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
Give them a little more time I'm sure they'll have more information dug up, they picked the low hanging fruit first.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 30, 2009 09:02 AM (AJ4xq)
Posted by: bunny boy at April 30, 2009 09:03 AM (YsSn7)
Posted by: pbx at April 30, 2009 09:03 AM (MobLv)
Posted by: PISSED at April 30, 2009 09:03 AM (dttj6)
Cripes, the left wingers have some royally fucked up logic, don't they?
Reggie1971, meet honest cloud. Honest cloud, meet Reggie1971.
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at April 30, 2009 09:04 AM (ERJIu)
This whole deal is meaningless so I have no problems with conspiracies in this case.
Posted by: Chimney Sweep #8 at April 30, 2009 09:05 AM (kIjlp)
Posted by: Eleven at April 30, 2009 09:05 AM (7DB+a)
Posted by: Edward Van Cullen at April 30, 2009 09:06 AM (f7A+e)
Posted by: bunny boy at April 30, 2009 09:07 AM (YsSn7)
Posted by: sickinmass at April 30, 2009 09:08 AM (/i4dU)
Posted by: Drumwaster at April 30, 2009 09:08 AM (Ymor3)
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 09:08 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Rogue at April 30, 2009 09:09 AM (+Ec6O)
I think the takeaway that the MSM is hoping you will, uh...take away...is that Ms. CA is nothing more than an artificial out-of-touch bimbo, so completely out-of-touch in her superficiality that she clearly should not be referred to as any sort of moral or intellectual pulse of the country.
Unlike that fine, upstanding, genuine girl-next-door, Ms. SC. This country could stand to have a few more of her.
And, since it hasn't been said yet, I'd vet her with my plumber, IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:09 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: required field at April 30, 2009 09:09 AM (56UMe)
She openly admitted she believes gay people should be treated as second class citizens. If I was gay I'd be pretty pissed off about it.
OH, Great, we can go after Obama, since they share the exact same stated position!
Wait, wut?
Posted by: XBradTC at April 30, 2009 09:10 AM (/R8R8)
Posted by: nickless at April 30, 2009 09:10 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 09:11 AM (3PqHz)
Posted by: Z Ryan at April 30, 2009 09:11 AM (PDeVA)
Posted by: sickinmass at April 30, 2009 09:12 AM (/i4dU)
"What's this about breasts? On this blog? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!"
I'm still bitter. You guys have all the good conversations when I'm not around.
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:13 AM (kZVsz)
Ace,
You are too young to remember the "Daisy" ad that Johnson ran against Goldwater. Outrageous, over the top. Will post a link next post.
Not one MSM complained. NY Times, "this brings up real issues".
Media coverage has NEVER changed until a Australian started Fox. Until then there was no alternative to "Uncle Walter's" liberal shit. That would be Cronkite for those you weren't born.
Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at April 30, 2009 09:13 AM (qvT/A)
I thought the federal government's HIPPA rules would preclude someone from disclosing info about another's medical history.
Maybe attorney general Eric Holder should prosecute Moakler.
Posted by: AJ Lynch at April 30, 2009 09:14 AM (s3Pex)
Posted by: yarrrr at April 30, 2009 09:14 AM (tXwoo)
OH, Great, we can go after Obama, since they share the exact same stated position!
Yes. Please do. Finally you asswipes have something that is legit. Take it and run.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 09:15 AM (hOPQH)
Posted by: Eleven at April 30, 2009 09:15 AM (7DB+a)
Vote for a Republican and your children will die.
The "Daisy Ad". NO SHAME. IT'S war boys, it always has been so give no quarter.
Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at April 30, 2009 09:16 AM (qvT/A)
"I don't blame any of those who go after her"
You're a stereotypical leftist. Of course you approve of this sort of relentless and creepy personal attack on people who express incorrect opinions.
Posted by: smorfia48 at April 30, 2009 09:16 AM (RIS+8)
Eric Blair (George Orwell to you) was not a novelist; he was a prophet.
You always wondered where the line between partisan editorializing and outright propaganda was; wonder no more. The MSM crossed it during Bammer's campaign. They are for all intents and purposes now the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Monty at April 30, 2009 09:17 AM (/0a60)
I thought the federal government's HIPPA rules would preclude someone from disclosing info about another's medical history.
As I understand it, the pagent paid for the bolt-on boobies. So it would be like your employer paying for your vasectomy and then taking out a full-page ad telling the world you're shooting blanks. Looks like a slam-dunk judgement to me.
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at April 30, 2009 09:17 AM (ERJIu)
DRUDGE
Posted by: PISSED at April 30, 2009 09:17 AM (dttj6)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 30, 2009 09:18 AM (NM1Nu)
Let the history books show that circa 2008 every paranoid right-wing prediction became reality.
Posted by: Crusty at April 30, 2009 09:18 AM (GvSpB)
It's your own fault for having some vestige of a personal life. The rest of us, lonely and twisted misanthropes that we are, literally have nothing better to do and nowhere else to go.
Posted by: Monty at April 30, 2009 09:18 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: KingShamus at April 30, 2009 09:19 AM (5BgCg)
Boob jobs are now a faux pas? Someone tell Hollywood.
Posted by: EC at April 30, 2009 09:20 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Honest Cloud Golden Showers Inc. at April 30, 2009 09:21 AM (MGu62)
I don't blame any of those who go after her.
She openly admitted she believes gay people should be treated as second class citizens. If I was gay I'd be pretty pissed off about it.
Posted by: honest cloud at April 30, 2009 02:01 PM (hOPQH)
So tell us queenie, are you pissed that your messiah is against gay marriage?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 09:21 AM (1Jaio)
She openly admitted she believes gay people should be treated as second class citizens.
Really? I must have missed the part in the soundbites where she went on a shreiking screed about how gays are rotten sub-humans with black pitch coursing through their tiny brains, and how they should all make her day and die in a fire.
Because all that skewed, right-wing conservative-bias media showed me was where she said, "I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I am sorry if this offends anyone."
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:21 AM (kZVsz)
lonely and twisted misanthropes
I am not! Am I?
I don't think we could replicate that thread last night if we tried. It careened wildly out of control. I blame Genghis for not posting an overnight link, we were left to our own devices, and look how that turned out!
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 30, 2009 09:23 AM (AJ4xq)
Remember our motto: When it rains, it pours with an Honest Cloud Golden Shower.
Just look for the union label, "Honest clouds bring golden showers," on all of our refillable troll dolls.
Posted by: Honest Cloud Golden Showers Inc. at April 30, 2009 09:24 AM (MGu62)
She openly admitted she believes gay people should be treated as second class citizens. If I was gay I'd be pretty pissed off about it.
The homosexualists couldn't possibly be more blatant in their hatred of anyone who crosses them, so they are fair game.
They're outnumbered 19 to 1. If they want war, this will not end well for them. She never said anything about treating gays as second class citizens, by the way, that's just more screamingly dramatic gay caterwauling. And you wonder why everyone hates you.
Boycott gay businesses. Don't donate to AIDS charities. Turn your back to gays if you encounter them. If you employ them, and you live in a state where it is legal to fire them, fire them. Don't sell to them, don't buy from them. Obviously don't invite them into your home or to social functions - who needs an unbalanced hater screaming and braying about how America is homophobicist? Target any and all gays running for office and attack - they represent a threat to freedom orders of magnitude greater than any demographic cohort; check their voting record, not one of them is fiscally conservative.
I'm not saying I agree with Hitler's rounding up of the gays, and I'm not saying I disagree, but I now understand completely why he did it. It was never about the buttsecks, it was because bolshevism and ghey were so tightly coupled that one was wholly indistinguishable from the other, both representing a serious threat. They made the choice to align themselves with the bolshies, just as today's gays have established themselves as vicious little Marxists. I would have no problem whatsoever if the Marxists were rounded up and to the extent this would include virtually every gay too, well, too bad. They didn't play ball, they didn't speak up when others were persecuted, so fuck em.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 09:24 AM (DJjeC)
Let's get this thread back on topic, instead of playing with Perez Hilton's houseboy...
Let's get back to talking about Carrie's tits!
Posted by: EC at April 30, 2009 09:25 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: nickless at April 30, 2009 09:26 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 30, 2009 09:26 AM (NM1Nu)
Is there a chart for this?
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 09:26 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 09:28 AM (DJjeC)
Vote for a Republican and your children will die.
Didn't we get the same thing from Obama's attack ad with the young mother and her baby, begging us not to vote for John "I Personally Want to Fight in Iraq for 100 Years!" McSlaughter? C'mon. You remember the one.
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:29 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: Eric at April 30, 2009 09:30 AM (MFvqO)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 30, 2009 09:30 AM (NM1Nu)
If the surgery is done correctly, the fruit sits up firmly and doesn't hang much at all.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at April 30, 2009 09:33 AM (fnU+z)
Posted by: buzzion at April 30, 2009 09:34 AM (Lrsi6)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at April 30, 2009 09:34 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: WAstaterepub at April 30, 2009 09:35 AM (aC/SY)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 09:37 AM (/bqyT)
"It careened wildly out of control. I blame Genghis for not posting an overnight link, we were left to our own devices, and look how that turned out!"
It was Ginger's fault, in my opinion after perusing the after-effects this morning. She's the one that brought up the size of her endowments. She loves to torment we boys on here, and the rest of you women joined in on the fun.
I came to a realization one bitter evening in college, while picking up the various and sundry pieces of my heart after having it shattered by yet another beautiful woman with no perceivable soul. Girls are evil.
Unfortunately, we boys wouldn't have it any other way.
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:38 AM (kZVsz)
Is there a chart for this?
Imagine if you will a Venn diagram consisting of a single green circle where yellow is ghey and blue is bolshie.
Actually I do have figures from Canada, only 7% of gay men support the Conservatives. That's about a sixth the level of support of straight men. It's not that I find the numbers astonishing, it's leftist poli sci profs who do. Someone else did a study of gay politicians and their record of fiscal conservatism; is anyone surprised that they are somewhat spendy when they get in office? Does Barney Frank strike you as a guy who cares about the deficit and taxes and other yucky het concepts?
The tight coupling of ghey and bolshie is one of the better documented relationships in political science, I'm hardly out on a limb here. The buttsecks is irrelevent to me; it's the Marxism which I affirm is a clear and present danger to my person, my wallet, my friends, family, country, and civilization. How is this controversial or crazy in any way? It's not. They are a threat - maybe the threat - to western civilization, and they need to be neutralized.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 09:38 AM (DJjeC)
#8-So now the left is defining down hypocrisy to actions that have nothing to do with anything. If they're going to go this route, they'd probably do better to point out that one of the hair, makeup, or wardrobe types is gay.
My only beef with this statement is where you said they should point out that ONE of the hair, makeup or wardrobe types is gay. Shouldn't you have said, try to find the one that WASN'T gay?? My daughter was in pageants when she was young, age18 mos-6 yrs, and even in that age group there are tons of gays spray tanning, sewing on sequins, and doing hair, behind the scenes. I can only imagine how many gays actually run the big pageants.
Posted by: di butler (New and Improved. Now with 20% more boobs!) at April 30, 2009 09:38 AM (qPIRP)
I heard that Miss California is actually Trig's mother!
Oh, wait, this isn't the insane lunatics thread? I got confused there for a minute.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 30, 2009 09:38 AM (AJ4xq)
Posted by: Suzy at April 30, 2009 09:39 AM (p4IN8)
I came to a realization one bitter evening in college, while picking up the various and sundry pieces of my heart after having it shattered by yet another beautiful woman with no perceivable soul. Girls are evil.
There's mathematical proof of that too.
Posted by: buzzion at April 30, 2009 09:41 AM (Lrsi6)
Posted by: KingShamus at April 30, 2009 09:42 AM (5BgCg)
Oh, and round up that Jooooo Steyn too. He likes show tunes.
Posted by: Adriana "'straight' guy using a white power female Brazilian model's name as sock puppet calling oth at April 30, 2009 09:42 AM (MGu62)
Liberal advocates of gay marriage -- and gays themselves -- often repudiate the "slippery slope" argument, but I think they're whistling in the dark. I think social conservatives have a very strong argument to make regarding the kinds of familial unions we're willing to tolerate as a society. There are many very good reasons apart from the usual religious and ethical ones to advocate for the traditional male/female marriage.
And I say this as a guy with nothing against gays, or against homosexual cohabitation.
Posted by: Monty at April 30, 2009 09:42 AM (/0a60)
Yeah, the next thing you know the media will be breathlessly reporting about "nude photographs of Miss CA runner up surfacing"--what they won't say that they were taken when she was being bathed as a newborn. The media sucks!
One of the top draws to Glenn Beck's site was a spoof article about Sarah Palin bikini pics. It still draws tons of traffic, despite several attempts himself to debunk the existence of these pictures...
Men are pigs. And to that I say, oink.
Posted by: reason at April 30, 2009 09:42 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 09:42 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: ousoonerfan15 at April 30, 2009 09:43 AM (yAq/A)
More than abandoning their alleged objectivity, this is the real problem. It's one thing to be biased, it is another to be a servile organ of one political party or politician. And that's what they've become.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 30, 2009 09:43 AM (PQY7w)
Adriana "'straight' guy using a white power female Brazilian model's name as sock puppet calling oth ...ers queer" Lima....
What? Sock puppets' names can't run on for a long time? Oh, poo.
Posted by: Adriana "etc." Lima at April 30, 2009 09:44 AM (MGu62)
Our "journalists" don't just possess the power to destroy.
They view destroying people (the "right" people) as their sworn and solemn duty.
Publicly oppose any Leftist program, policy or belief system, and they will happily work to destroy you.
Our press is openly, palpably anti-free speech, anti-free markets, anti-individual rights, anti-state's rights, anti-military, anti-capitalism, and, ultimately, anti-American. They are nothing more than the ideological attack dogs of the DNC, and their totalitarian tendencies know no boundaries.
At some point in our nation's near future there needs to be some serious, substantial, indelible public pushback against them.
Posted by: Sam Adams at April 30, 2009 09:45 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 09:46 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: Barry da man Obamacan at April 30, 2009 09:46 AM (NLtVk)
Posted by: eddiebear at April 30, 2009 09:48 AM (wnU1W)
Hmmmm... so has Honest Clod been running to every left wing blog bitching, moaning and insulting Obama for "treating gays like 2nd class citizens?"
No?
Oh my.
Is he a ... what's the word lefties love so much ...
hypocrite?
Posted by: Warden at April 30, 2009 09:49 AM (QoR4a)
--- seems to be a strong pattern here
Posted by: Barry da man Obamacan at April 30, 2009 09:50 AM (NLtVk)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 09:51 AM (/bqyT)
"I think they're whistling in the dark"
I've often been told that you only can do what you know,
And I've often been told that you only can do what you know how to do well.
Posted by: a giant (maybe) at April 30, 2009 09:55 AM (kZVsz)
HC breaks out the disclaimer again.
C'mon HC, don't lie to yourself....
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 30, 2009 10:00 AM (uwPRk)
Posted by: hacksallaround at April 30, 2009 10:01 AM (y4/rJ)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:02 AM (/bqyT)
It is my understanding that this is also the position of El Presidente Dreamy McTeleprompter Jesus.
Posted by: Holdfast at April 30, 2009 10:02 AM (Gzb30)
Posted by: Dan F at April 30, 2009 10:03 AM (X69s8)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:07 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:08 AM (/bqyT)
mar·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij\
Function: noun Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry Date: 14th century (yes... it has meant the same thing for over 700 years) (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law How exactly can 2 men or 2 women be married to eachother? How about this. I hereby proclaim a new word, "queerriage":queer·riage
Pronunciation: \ˈkwir-ij, ˈkwir-rij\
Function: noun Etymology: Modern American English: New word Date: 21st century 1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the same sex as husband and husband or wife and wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law We can give it all the social privilages that marriage has. I will not be offended, will not try to change the definition, and will not think you want me to be a second class citizen if I can't be queeried to a chick. Sound fair?Posted by: theBman at April 30, 2009 10:12 AM (/vN7m)
Not one question for Obama on what he knew about Air Force I buzzing Manhattan trailed by two fighter planes.
Not one.
Not one question about what necessitated this idiotic flyby, when he first knew about it, where he was when he found out, how he found out, who told him, or why his staff ignored the obvious dread, fear and panic this action would undoubtedly foist upon the public.
Why no questions for Obama?
Because the press knows that this action can't be defended, much less coherently explained. Hence, they'll bravely circle the wagons around our Idiot-in-Chief, and viciously attack any and all who seek a rational explanation.
Posted by: Sam Adams at April 30, 2009 10:14 AM (GkYyh)
Because the dorkbats never recognized 911, even when it happened they were hiding beneath the covers.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:17 AM (/bqyT)
In California almost every high school girl asks her Daddy to get her a new plastic pair of boobs for high school graduation. I'd say that 80% of the knockers on 18 to 22 year old girls in California today have had, shall we say, a "little bit of work".
Actually Ms. Prejean came from a darn good family background. But her father either wouldn't or couldn't pungle up for that new pair of Gazungas.
So as a result of this shocking California childhood deprivation, she had to get her new pair of plastic knockers from the two gay organizers of the Miss USA Pageant--and those pathetic pricks actually "outed" her boob job! Hellfire, they weren't interested in marrying her, so what's the problem with her views on gay marriage? It's not like she's taking anything off the table from those two jerks.
Posted by: Mike Myers at April 30, 2009 10:18 AM (UHTK+)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:19 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: Holdfast at April 30, 2009 10:21 AM (Gzb30)
Posted by: Senator Larry Craig at April 30, 2009 10:21 AM (xVKXy)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 10:22 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: kbdabear at April 30, 2009 10:29 AM (miw86)
93 'Nam Grunt,
I think it's even worse than that.
I think these people believe that we deserved 9/11, and much, much worse.
Posted by: Sam Adams at April 30, 2009 10:30 AM (GkYyh)
By the way, gays can already get married. Ask Liza Minelli.
Why do we have to sacrifice the thousands-year old definition of marriage, as well as all attendant definitions (bride, groom, bridesmaids, groomsmen, etc.), just to satisfy the screeching of an incoherent, militant lavender mob?
If "gay" marriage is just like a "straight" marriage, then there is no appreciable difference between the Sun and the Moon.
Posted by: Sam Adams at April 30, 2009 10:39 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at April 30, 2009 10:57 AM (1hM1d)
Well if that's not representative of California, then I don't know what is.
But now that these investigative geniuses have discovered this wholly inconceivable bombshell, I wonder what else might've been enhanced. Nails? Teeth? Tan? Hair? Why, it's a scandal. A scandal!
The real question though is, "is Miss California Trig's mother?" C'mon MSM. Dance. Dance like hyenic orangutans.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 30, 2009 11:00 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: Twinks at April 30, 2009 11:27 AM (dTt9I)
Posted by: di butler (New and Improved. Now with 20% more boobs!) at April 30, 2009 11:28 AM (qPIRP)
Goddamnit this pisses me off. I support gay marriage, but this brown-shirt intimidation of political dissent is dangerous. This crap went on all through the election and helped convince me that Obama absolutely was the leader of a dangerous cult that would happily use all the tools of intimidation at hand to win and hold power.
This woman should not be pilloried for this view. And I'm not just saying that because she is freaking hot.
Posted by: doug at April 30, 2009 11:33 AM (UpJts)
Posted by: Kranix at April 30, 2009 11:42 AM (2yIGi)
This crap went on all through the election and helped convince me that Obama absolutely was the leader of a dangerous cult that would happily use all the tools of intimidation at hand to win and hold power.
The bright side is that once they start to play those cards, it's open season on these sacks of poop.
Posted by: MikeO at April 30, 2009 11:59 AM (hz67i)
Aint that the truth. I know that I couldn't tell you the name of the winner of the USA pageant, but I sure know the name of the runner up.
Posted by: chewydog at April 30, 2009 12:15 PM (eBpOK)
"Right. Media is targeting beauty queens for black ops, and I'm the crazy bad guy. Well, so it goes."
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 02:28 PM
Well, it's not like the two things are mutually exclusive.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at April 30, 2009 12:17 PM (ACDor)
Posted by: Former President-elect Barak Obama at April 30, 2009 12:18 PM (iafWn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 30, 2009 12:19 PM (iafWn)
Posted by: Mephitis at April 30, 2009 01:37 PM (ehXLT)
Posted by: Honest Cloud at April 30, 2009 01:52 PM (0Qynq)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse at April 30, 2009 04:30 PM (AVYqB)
Posted by: Honest Cloud at April 30, 2009 06:31 PM (0Qynq)
Posted by: Every hetero man in the World at April 30, 2009 07:01 PM (7FgWm)
Hey everybody, look at me, look at me! Don't look at her, look at ME!
Posted by: Meaghan McCain at April 30, 2009 07:05 PM (7FgWm)
It's as if they had some NASCAR tech inspector guys there with their body templates checking them out and saying "You must be this big to enter the contest."
Posted by: GrayLoess at April 30, 2009 10:32 PM (eifYH)
Posted by: Honest Cloud at May 01, 2009 06:17 AM (0Qynq)
I know she's a Nice Christian Girl and all, but I wonder what her kinks are?
Posted by: SGT Dan at May 01, 2009 06:54 AM (/KqGF)
Posted by: Adrianna Lima at May 01, 2009 11:30 PM (0Qynq)
Posted by: vcbnvcbn at May 12, 2009 11:20 PM (85HLz)
Posted by: Mercedes-Benz at June 02, 2011 09:30 PM (xJe3c)
Posted by: hublot at April 23, 2012 04:12 AM (jAY8C)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









