July 06, 2008
— DrewM It's called "Balance" and it will run in 4 battleground states. Apparently titling it "Some Of The Things Drew M. Can't Stand About McCain" wasn't considered but it would have been accurate.
Two lines from the spot really stuck out to me, "A Climate In Crisis" and "He's pushing his own party to face climate change". I know this ad is targeting moderates and independents but shouldn't the RNC be spending its money reaching out to you know, Republicans?
I'd like to thank the RNC for making it easier for me to not feel bad about laughing when I throw their solicitation letters in the trash.
Posted by: DrewM at
09:44 AM
| Comments (28)
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
I always come back the Ronald Reagans " bold colors, not pale pastels" line.
The RNC and McCain need to realize people want to be led , not pandered to by squishy rhetoric.
And you don't throw your Goddamn party under the bus to score points with environuts who have NO INTENTION of voting for you.
A firm prinicpled conservative campaign would obliterate Obama- instead we get sackcloth and ashes. Idiots!
Posted by: jjshaka at July 06, 2008 10:03 AM (XW5Ac)
Posted by: Jeff at July 06, 2008 10:09 AM (5v2i9)
AGW is on its face and bleeding, the MSM is trying to resuscitate it so they can get their fascism on, and Johnny Mac is rushing in with the defibrillator.
Just stop, John, the fucking Sierra Club is NOT going to vote for you... and at the rate you're going, the base isn't going to either.
The only man who can defeat McCain is McCain, so he needs to get out of his own face and let himself win.
Posted by: Merovign at July 06, 2008 10:16 AM (UXoQt)
Does this surprise anyone?
It certainly doesn't surprise me. I figure the kind of ad McCain runs in October will be along the lines of "Vote for me cause I'm going to fuck those Republicans hard!".
Posted by: memomachine at July 06, 2008 10:16 AM (VFHt1)
"The only man who can defeat McCain is McCain, so he needs to get out of his own face and let himself win."
Interesting he did really well when Obama got all the face time and McCain wasn't anywhere to be seen.
He should really try the "Shut the fuck up" strategy. Of course his campaign consultants won't go for it because that's money not in their fingers.
Posted by: memomachine at July 06, 2008 10:18 AM (VFHt1)
Posted by: WarusRex at July 06, 2008 10:30 AM (FC2hW)
Posted by: ray at July 06, 2008 12:10 PM (ix3FU)
Posted by: runninrebel at July 06, 2008 01:57 PM (vdwws)
Heh.
Thanks. I'll use it to play a dirge if McCain ever gets to institute his amnesty and cap and trade plans.
Posted by: DrewM. at July 06, 2008 02:02 PM (hlYel)
Just saw it during the Reds/Nationals game here in the battleground state of Ohio. My first impression was meh. I feel distinctly un-pandered to. Is that the same thing as disenfranchised?
My second impression was, the RNC is trying to get the climate alarmists on board with more drilling and the drill here now folks to recognize our climate in crisis in the same ad. That is a wide stance to keep your balance with. Best of luck Maverick.
Posted by: Pupster at July 06, 2008 02:09 PM (BExLP)
He's pushing his own party to face climate change.
This from the RNC. Er, aren't you guys "the party" that he's pushing? Why not, you know, respond to him, guys?
I can't wait for the amnesty commercial:
He's trying to shut the bigots in his own party up.
Posted by: FUBAR at July 06, 2008 02:26 PM (HrVHr)
Posted by: eman at July 06, 2008 02:46 PM (WWkFI)
Posted by: Paradigm Shift at July 06, 2008 03:23 PM (tswA9)
This ad has the bad taste to actually mention McCain's opponent in the election. Then the ad shows a picture of him where he can clearly be seen as black. How racist can you get?
Posted by: klrtz1 at July 06, 2008 03:40 PM (hcx9C)
I'd like to thank the RNC for making it easier for me to not feel bad about laughing when I throw their solicitation letters in the trash...
...not one fucking dime, Senator.
Not.One.Fucking.Dime.
Posted by: davis,br at July 06, 2008 04:00 PM (7QgFP)
Posted by: JavaJoe at July 06, 2008 04:31 PM (Am6n/)
The McCain commercial isnt bad, but its just a bit too bland. It seems like someone is giving McCain fair campaign advice, but not good advice. This commercial (via Hot Air) is better, and no names are mentioned..
What is really needed, and needed by early September, is a series of commercials like the one showing the ordinary public educating Michelle Obama about pride in America.
There is something to be said for saying nothing while BHO trips himself up trying to master foreign policy, economics, and every other thing all leaders with experience have already mastered, but at some point McCain needs to say something. Questions need to be asked, explanations need to be demanded and problems, failures need to be exposed, and all at an adult level.
Ideally, all of this will happen at a live & televised, adult-style, debate. But someone is refusing, and it isn't McCain; who is it and why?
McCain needs to hammer away on BHOs past associations; Wright and the other racists; Ayres and the other sanctimonious terrorist snots; Rezko and the multitude of failed Chicago housing refurbishments. $43million was paid to Rezko and the result was and still seems to be: bankrupt developments and mostly empty apartments; who has the money now? Anyone want to see this at the national level?
McCain needs to hammer away on BHOs resume and work experience; to paraphrase Capn Ed at Hot Air:
If McCains 24 years in the US Senate are not sufficient, how are BHOs 3 (most of them spent campaigning for President)?
If McCains tour as military commander, leader and, well, warrior (in the ancient sense of the word) are not sufficient, how is BHOs time as community organizer a better qualification (which he left, to go to Harvard)?
McCain is not perfect, and I have reservations, but BHO owes too many people (looks like about $925,000 to Rezko), and has spent essentially all of his career dogmatically following and executing the instructions of others. His regular disavowal of friends, supporters ideas, etc., sheds a new light on the meaning of the phrase "Thats not the ____ I knew"©.
Who here dreams of the Michael Moore / Arec Bardwin / Kos / San Francisco / SF Billionaires Row / Leftist utopia that BHOs "Hope and Change" represents?Do not vote for McCain this November, and your dream will come true.
Posted by: Arbalest at July 06, 2008 08:23 PM (feDJw)
Drew is the mirror-image of the Kossaks who constantly threaten to take their ball and go home if the Party doesn't capitulate to every one of their demands!
It may have escaped your braniac minds, but could you perhaps entertain the concept that the reason the Republicans were successful until 2006 was that they continually managed to persuade the independent/centrists out there?
Rove was wrong. 2002 and 2004 successes weren't the result of "turning out the base," but rather engaging the center.
The Kossacks won't win elections with their mindless dogma any more than the Malkanites will with their "McShamnesty," or "every Muslim supports terrorists" demagoguing.
Winners capture a wide spread; this could include a left/center/somewhat-right distribution, a (theoretical) "true center" distribution, or a somewhat-left/center/right distribution.
...And I hate to tell you guys, but the "we may suck, but the Demoncrats suck worse!" defense took a huge hit back in 2006. Y'all might want to consider a different strategy.
Posted by: Casey at July 06, 2008 08:37 PM (RJSy/)
...shouldn't the RNC be spending its money reaching out to, you know, tell the Truth?!?
"Climate Changing Global Worms" my Aunt Fannie...
Posted by: Faye Kinnit at July 07, 2008 12:45 AM (l1oyw)
Drew is the mirror-image of the Kossaks who constantly threaten to take their ball and go home if the Party doesn't capitulate to every one of their demands!
As a conservative, I don't expect him to "capitulate to every one of [my] demands." I do expect his ACU rating to be higher than the lifetime rating of 82.3%, the pathetic 74% that it's been since 2000, and the absolutely risible 64% conservative rating in 2006, the last year of available data (and a year in which he was 47th in conservative Senate votes). Only RINOs Collins, Snowe, Chafee and Specter make his numbers look tolerable. Add to this that Sen. Kyl has a lifetime ACU rating of 96.9%--representing the same state's constituency.
For a guy who pitches himself as a "Reagan-era Republican," I don't think it's asking too much that he vote like one. In fact, I could even be inclined to vote for McCain if he'd just sack up, switch parties, and run as one of their most conservative guys, if only because he'd acknowledge his proper affiliation. At least in doing so he'd quit the bait-and-switch charade.
Posted by: railwriter at July 07, 2008 05:51 AM (nwEiU)
Posted by: Melodic_Metal at July 07, 2008 07:09 AM (JFsBJ)
McCain and I have a different view of the election coming up. I think he needs me and a whole lot of people like me to win, and I think that if he became a conservative republican he would win this going away, because the middle would run to a guy with guts and smart ideas.
McCain thinks he needs a whole lot of people in the middle to win, but thinks that you have to play to the other side to get them. I think he's wrong.
We'll see who's right after the election. I will go to the voting booth, but may only vote lower on the ticket. I have not decided, and can't seem to find my candidate.
Posted by: Mephitis at July 07, 2008 08:42 AM (8vJF0)
I agree. McCain's still assuming conservatives will rally to him come election day with full faith that "there's nowhere else to go." (Or he actually thinks gains from the middle and middle Left will offset his losses from the Right.) Nuts to that.
McCain's counting on a demographic that likely will be as flighty as bird and deciding on or about election day which way to go depending on such things as the day's political wind which he won't control (historical events and legacy media being what they are), what they had for breakfast, and whether or not there's compelling TV for the evening to compete for their time. That demographic will not draw a single other voter out to help him win an election. That demographic may not even cast its own vote.
The conservative base however, if given something less than regular, swift kickings in the nuts and public chewings out, could actually gin up support on his behalf and draw up for McCain not only their own vote but the votes of those undecideds who were convinced by that base to support him.
McCain cannot count on those who he is courting most right now no matter what he does. It'll be a crapshoot on gameday. His performance so far also ensures that he won't be able to count on a significant portion of the conservative base either.
Hard to believe McCain will likely lose to the most unqualified Presidential candidate ever to have run for the office. I already know I've lost no matter who between McCain or Obama wins, but the GOP faithful need for McCain to have a paradigm shift.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at July 07, 2008 09:18 AM (sI5Ho)
BITE YOUR TONGUE! That's heresy and I dare say, young man, deserving of being drawn and quartered. No need to jump the shark to make your point. You may have to sit in Time Out for at least a few hours until you reconsider and apologize for that slander.
Posted by: Conservative Belle at July 07, 2008 10:48 AM (IoH7q)
It may have escaped your braniac minds, but could you perhaps entertain the concept that the reason the Republicans were successful until 2006 was that they continually managed to persuade the independent/centrists out there?
Wrong, Casey, wrong. Rove's foolish "Hispandering" utterly backfired. Creating a new prescription entitlement didn't pay off either.
Rove was wrong. 2002 and 2004 successes weren't the result of "turning out the base," but rather engaging the center.
If what Rove did was "turning out the base" I hate to think what "engaging the center" means...
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 08, 2008 06:21 AM (ujg0T)
Wrong, Casey, Wrong.
Rove's strategy of "Hispandering" utterly backfired. Giving away a new Medicare presciption entitlement to the old didn't help either.
If THAT was "turning out the base", I hate to think what "appealing to the center" will be....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 08, 2008 10:18 AM (ujg0T)
Rove was wrong. 2002 and 2004 successes weren't the result of "turning out the base," but rather engaging the center.
There's a huge difference between engaging the center and becoming the center. Reagan, to use the best example, engaged the center but he used the power of his ideas and his ability to communicate to bring the center to him. You make the base bigger. McCain does just the opposite. He moves his positions to accomodate them.
Will McCain's strategy work? Maybe. So what? He doesn't represent me and he has made zero attempt to convince me of the wisdom of his positions either because he doesn't want my vote or he can't.
Posted by: JackStraw at July 08, 2008 10:42 AM (VBon8)
laser cutting machine is suitable for cutting and punching on stuffed toys, automobile internal decoration and textile fabrics. And laser cutting bed is suitable for processing different kinds of materials. There are also a lot of laser equipments produced by Goldenlaser including pattern making machine, laser cutting , laser embroidery machine, garment and so on. There is also a special machine, cutting machine which is suitable for small amount of the made to measure material.
Posted by: laser cutting machine at April 19, 2011 10:00 PM (TCmi2)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









