July 31, 2006
— Ace Hey, if you can fake cool video like this, you deserve to control the world.
The JEW is using DOCTORED VIDEO FOOTAGE to MOVE IN ON YOU, and you are left DEFENSELESS.
Via Powerline, who have audio of Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) with a curious answer to a question about Hezbollah.
And not related at all, but I can't help quoting Allah's suggestion that Mel Gibson will be posting at the Huffington Post within a month.
Well, sure. Now that he's not a celebrity anymore, why not?
Correction: As commenters inform me, Dingell is a Representative, and not yet a Senator, Allah be praised.
Posted by: Ace at
04:49 PM
| Comments (18)
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Steve L. at July 31, 2006 05:07 PM (u6JF6)
Posted by: marc at July 31, 2006 05:09 PM (QmDBB)
Large Middle Eastern community in the Detroit area, ya know.
Posted by: monica at July 31, 2006 05:15 PM (rFLG5)
Posted by: Beto Ochoa at July 31, 2006 05:20 PM (RqXgS)
I am atarting to see why they blame all the wars on the Jews though.
If you look at Jew haters they to a person are incapable of the ability to balace a checkbook to finace a war. Big talk, a energetic first strike but in the end they fizzle like a teenage boy seeing his first naked woman.
Posted by: Bill at July 31, 2006 05:24 PM (xuO5A)
Posted by: spurwing plover at July 31, 2006 05:36 PM (vnSBY)
I have watched for years as Hollywood as made rabidly anti-christian movies like Priest and Saved and the Last Temptation of Christ. No Hollywood elites called for any boycotts.
Now a single drunk actor says some really horrible things and his career is over?
He made the best movie EVER. This is why the Hollywood elite hates him.
Posted by: Ian at July 31, 2006 06:03 PM (DwFzZ)
Posted by: Scrapiron at July 31, 2006 06:17 PM (Ffvoi)
Posted by: Sobek at July 31, 2006 06:27 PM (dmsUZ)
Posted by: Tushar D at August 01, 2006 03:09 AM (tyRhL)
“You’re not against Hezbollah?” Dingell answers, “No…”
Full exchange:
Q: You’re not against Hezbollah?
DINGELL: No, I happen to be — I happen to be against violence, I think the United States has to bring resolution to this matter. Now, I condemn Hezbollah as does everybody else, for the violence.
Video and trqanscript at thinkprogress.org
Hmmm, talk about a dishonest broker of the news, slanted viewpoint, creative editing, etc, etc. Say what you will about Dingell's position, but this is a distortion of his position, pure and simple.
Posted by: Larry the U at August 01, 2006 06:10 AM (Lpswv)
Hairsplitting drivel. The purpose of Hezbollah is the destruction of Israel and, eventually, the U.S. Hezbollah achieves its goals through violence. To say that he is not against Hezbollah but against violence is to ignore the terrorist group and its goals and focus on its tactics.
Hezbollah slaughtered 243 Marines in Lebanon. Is Dingell still for Hezbollah but against violence?
Equivocating son of a bitch.
Posted by: museoffire at August 01, 2006 06:28 AM (3i6Gn)
"First of all, I don't take sides...for or against Hezbollah or for or against Israel."
Honestly, though, the entire statement is so inarticulate as to be meaningless.
Posted by: Slublog at August 01, 2006 06:35 AM (R8+nJ)
Reaffirms steadfast support for Israel.
Condemns Hamas and
Hezbollah for: (1) engaging in unprovoked and reprehensible attacks
against Israel on undisputed Israeli territory, for taking hostages,
for killing Israeli soldiers, and for indiscriminately targeting
Israeli civilian populations with rockets and missiles; and (2)
exploiting civilian populations as shields, locating their equipment
and bases of operation, including rockets and other armaments, amidst
civilian populations, including in homes and mosques.
Recognizes Israel's commitment to minimizing civilian loss and welcomes Israel's efforts to prevent civilian casualties.
Demands that Iran and Syria direct Hamas and Hezbollah to immediately
and unconditionally release the captive Israeli soldiers.
Guess who voted against it?
Seriously...you'll never guess.
Posted by: Slublog at August 01, 2006 07:02 AM (R8+nJ)
Posted by: Roy at August 01, 2006 07:31 AM (2XXia)
Not to totaly piss on the parade, but sentiment running high from 20 people? Let's give that one some time...
tmi3rd
Posted by: tmi3rd at August 01, 2006 07:34 AM (5Z2JP)
I just thought it would be a good opportunity to give them a surprise turnaround.
After that, I'll have a parade.
Posted by: Roy at August 01, 2006 08:47 AM (2XXia)
Posted by: lorry at March 12, 2007 01:34 PM (ZqQ2E)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









