July 17, 2008

Offshore Oil Ban Expires September 30th, But "Will Amost Certainly Be Renewed" (?!?!?)
— Ace

How could that happen? Bush won't veto any bill renewing the ban? There'd be enough Congressmen and Senators to override the veto?

What madness is this?

President Bush’s decision this week to allow preparation of leases for energy exploration on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lets Republicans press their energy advantage even harder. Bush’s executive order of Monday removes all White House restrictions on the establishment of new oil leases. Democrats had been using these restrictions as an excuse for Congress to do nothing about oil exploration. The ball is clearly in the Democrats’ court. The OCS drilling ban expires on September 30, with the Department of the Interior’s fiscal 2008 appropriations. Although House sources believe it will almost certainly be renewed, that renewal will create another political pressure point on a good Republican issue close to this year’s election.

Um, I'm not interested in "political pressure points." I'm interested in positive action. If the GOP can't do this -- what the hell use are they?

They don't have to affirmatively pass a law here, something that's very hard to do from a minority position, nevermind all the squishes and RINOs. They merely need to deny the Democrats a two thirds majority to override a veto in either house.

Again: Bush isn't planning on a firm veto? The GOP seriously can't even muster this minor level of solidarity on such an important (and politically winning) issue?

I'm going to write to some of my few congressional contacts to find out what the hell is going on with this.

Posted by: Ace at 08:30 AM | Comments (53)
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.

1
Completely off-topic, but:

Read Lileks today. He's on fire.

Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at July 17, 2008 08:38 AM (4bOTm)

2

Um, I'm not interested in "political pressure points." I'm interested in positive action. If the GOP can't do this -- what the hell use are they?

Now you know how pro-lifers feel.

Posted by: Sydney Carton at July 17, 2008 08:44 AM (nWYwS)

3 The problem is it's tied to the Dept of Interior's budget. The Dems won't take it out. So it's really means stopping the whole department. That's a lot of cash that mostly go to Republican states out west and  to all 50 states. Repubs will let it go to keep the cash flowing, maybe even trade their vote for more cash as no one is going to shutdown the Dept of the Interior s a month before election day.

If they had balls though they would do this but it cuts to close to campaign time.

Posted by: Rocks at July 17, 2008 08:46 AM (Q1lie)

4 Memo to self...

Add this to reasons I laugh when receiving fundraising pleas from GOP.

Posted by: DrewM. at July 17, 2008 08:47 AM (hlYel)

5

>>That's a lot of cash that mostly go to Republican states out west and  to all 50 states.

So, common man is getting screwed to feed special interests. I am so shocked, you could knock me down with a feather.

Posted by: Tushar at July 17, 2008 08:50 AM (IlgNp)

6 He might be an anti-war kook but there is a fellow named Barr who is in favor of ending the Department of \Interior.

Posted by: John Galt at July 17, 2008 08:53 AM (Lq/Cq)

7 I think you are misreading the article.  The very next paragraph reads:

“We’re going to keep putting pressure on them until they do the right thing,” says Rep. Charles Boustany (R., La.). It was Boustany who rallied congressional Republicans on this issue last Wednesday, circulating a letter that might have pushed President Bush to take action this week. “We have to strategically manage our reliance on fossil fuels while we make the transition to the new technologies. To completely turn our backs on oil drilling, like the Democrats have been advocating, is just not realistic.”

The way I read it the GOP is going to try and force Dems to vote no on reauthorization in the house because they don't have enough votes to stop it. 

Posted by: chad at July 17, 2008 08:54 AM (lNQg8)

8 It's all a big hoax!

Posted by: Nancy at July 17, 2008 09:00 AM (s5YdS)

9 A vast majority of people want drilling now. I would think even Democrats might respond to this. Bizarre.

Posted by: joe at July 17, 2008 09:01 AM (Ukf53)

10 The way I read it the GOP is going to try and force Dems to vote no on reauthorization in the house because they don't have enough votes to stop it.

The point is, who cares if they can't stop it? They can sustain a veto of the whole bill and try to force Dems to take it out.

It seems the Republicans don't want to stop it, at least not enough to make a stand on the Dept. of Interior funding bill.

Posted by: DrewM. at July 17, 2008 09:03 AM (hlYel)

11 Oh I think the Repubs will definitely make an issue of stripping the drilling ban for the budget when it comes up. Mccain, if he is smart will make a big speech from the senate floor. But in the end they won't have the votes and it will pass.
Which leaves only Bush's veto and trying to hold it.
McCain won't let that happen in a year when Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico are in play. Neither will the Repubs from those states.

Posted by: Rocks at July 17, 2008 09:05 AM (Q1lie)

12 Please do find you WTF is up with this insanity. Probably the only issue we have a chance on using effectively is "the oil weapon" (so the speak). Lord, it's being handed to us on silver platter. Don't f**k it up!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at July 17, 2008 09:09 AM (zpaDL)

13 find out...

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at July 17, 2008 09:10 AM (zpaDL)

14 Don't forget too that the states that have shale oil. With  more drilling the likely hood of approvals and funds for shale oil go down. Guess what, it's all in states that depend on the Dept of Interior. More reason to let the ban stay for them.

As far as I am concerned go for it, stop the insanity on the environment now.
People are part of nature too ya know?
But McCain, Hatch and others are never going to shutdown the Dept of the Interior.



Posted by: Rocks at July 17, 2008 09:17 AM (Q1lie)

15 James Watt, now more than evah.....

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at July 17, 2008 09:21 AM (zpaDL)

16

I've been beating this drum here for a couple of days. I'll say it again - McCain should threaten to filibuster any Senate bill that extends the ban.

He should shout it from the mountaintops every chance he gets and instruct all his surrogates to lead off any interview with it.

He needs to do it now, and for the most political of reasons - so he can take credit for killing the ban no matter whether he has to actually filibuster or not. He can say the threat was good enough.

I'm attending a fundraiser for him this coming Monday and plan to ask him the question point-blank. I'll let you morons know his response. I'm sure it'll be that it's too confrontational and not bipartisan/reach across the aisle touchy-feely enough, but who knows?

Posted by: Andy at July 17, 2008 09:24 AM (C3mTI)

17 My point is Ace has drawn a conclusion about President Bush not vetoing the bill based on nothing that was in the article.  The article was about the Dem conondrum on energy and the fact that Republicans (see the quote above) are going to pressure them on it to score some points.

If the reauthorization passes and President Bush vetoes it is highly unlikely that it can be overridden. 

Posted by: chad at July 17, 2008 09:32 AM (lNQg8)

18

"A vast majority of people want drilling now. I would think even Democrats might respond to this. Bizarre."

Here is how my Democratic senator, Sherrod Brown, responded to it in response to a letter from me:  "...it is clear that we can't rely on production alone to solve all our energy needs."  (I didn't say that it would).  "It is more likely that we wouldn't even see a drop of oil from many of these places for 10 to 20 years and even by the time some of these sites are at peak production, our savings at the pump would only be pennies per gallon"...blah, blah, blah....

Don't count on the Democrats in Congress to get even a tiny bit of sense about this.

 

 


 

Posted by: April at July 17, 2008 09:37 AM (qVLLg)

19

Here is how my Democratic senator, Sherrod Brown, responded to it in response to a letter from me:

I wonder when our state will finally get some good representation in the Senate, and as governor for that matter.

Posted by: buzzion at July 17, 2008 09:50 AM (Lrsi6)

20 So do I, buzz...at least Voinovich agreed on paper that the time to drill is now.

Posted by: April at July 17, 2008 09:57 AM (qVLLg)

21 The price of light sweet crude in New York is now below $130. I'd credit the Bush announcements this week. So we might see Senator Brown's pennies at the pump in the next week or so.

Posted by: Retread at July 17, 2008 09:59 AM (P/AfD)

22

Retread, you beat me to it. CL futures look set to close around 130 and have been on a downward trajectory since President Bush killed the executive order banning offshore drilling earlier this week.

But, I thought letting us drill our own oil wouldn't produce a drop or lower prices for years, so I can't see how these could possibly be related. You'd think the futures price was based on traders' expectations of what supply and demand might look like in the future or something like that.

Posted by: Andy at July 17, 2008 10:14 AM (C3mTI)

23

at least Voinovich agreed on paper that the time to drill is now.

Yeah but he's a little bitch when it came to the comprehensive piece of shit.  And DeWine was in the Gang of 14.  And then there was Glenn.

 

Posted by: buzzion at July 17, 2008 10:16 AM (Lrsi6)

24

Write your Congressman and Senators,

Here is a sample letter:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Senator [name] 

I have never written my Senator before but I feel this issue is too important.

I will keep it short.

Please do NOT renew the ban on off-shore drilling. 

This is such an obvious solution to our current energy predicament that I hesitate to even bring it up, but I expect you are getting pressure from radical environmental groups that still lobby for tight restrictions even in the face of the exhorbident oil prices.

Conservation = good.

New energy sources = good.  But they are mostly years off and will only supplement the current energy needs not replace it.

Opening up internal oil production will kill two birds with one stone.  It will reduce our dependance on foriegn oil and it will reduce prices. 

Once again, please do NOT renew the ban on off-shore drilling.

Thank you,
[your name]

-----------------------------------------------

...and MORONS take note, replace [your name] with your name.

....and I don't mean the words "your" and "name" but what other people call you.

...no, not what THEY call you, you can't sign an email with F$#*ing in your signature.

...crap nevermind.

Posted by: atheistica at July 17, 2008 10:32 AM (jvG2F)

25

>>...and MORONS take note, replace [your name] with your name.

Will the you thingy work?

Posted by: Tushar at July 17, 2008 10:50 AM (IlgNp)

26 Hmmmmm

I think people also need to consider that we're entering into a global cooling phase.  It's been months now but we're still waiting for the sun to begin a new sunspot cycle.  With more sunspots the sun generates more energy thus either heating the planet or at least maintaining the current temperature.

But in a lot of areas last winter was pretty nasty.  And with the lack of sunspots it looks like this winter might be just as bad or -worse-.

*plus* there are about 1 billion barrels of oil off the coast of southern California that had already been found, drilled and then capped because of Congress that we could access in just a couple months.  But cannot because of Congress.

I think people are vastly underestimating just how absolutely pissed off people are going to be this winter.

Posted by: memomachine at July 17, 2008 11:06 AM (3PLow)

27 My favorite part of the piece:

Sure enough, upon further questioning, it was revealed that the 4.8-million-barrel number was made up by Democratic staffers without the involvement of government scientists — a “guesstimate,” as Rep. Rahm Emmanuel (D., Ill.) put it. The bill failed to attain the two-thirds majority it needed, but it would not have lowered gasoline prices anyway.
They're not even trying any more. They just make up stuff and hope that they won't be called on it.

Posted by: Jeffc at July 17, 2008 11:26 AM (+inic)

28 If McCain had any... fire in the belly, he'd filibuster this thing.

Posted by: someone at July 17, 2008 12:56 PM (2z2WN)

29 Geez, are they spraying retard gas in DC? How difficult is this? You draw a line in the sand and bottle up everything until/unless the Dims surrender on your point. If they don't surrender, you get lots and lots of free media and sweet campaign commercial opportunities against the Dims. Dumbest party evah.

Posted by: rinseandspit at July 17, 2008 01:00 PM (ao5cQ)

30

If McCain had any... fire in the belly, he'd filibuster this thing.

Let it go.  All that hate is gonna eat you up.  Fred's dead, man.  Fred's dead.

Posted by: JackStraw at July 17, 2008 01:02 PM (VBon8)

31 I'm going to write to some of my few congressional contacts to find out what the hell is going on with this.

Hahaha. 

DearCongressional Contact,

Hi my name is Ace, remember me? I'm the recent winner of the CPAC Ann Coulter Faggot Award and me and my many tens of readers want to know; WTF!?!?!?  Drill drill drill-duh!  This electoral gold!  Are you throwing all of us 9/11 conservatives under the bus like so many used up Lamb of God unicorns?  Are you stuck on stupid like the liberals who are afraid of teh gays brown people?

You're a real dumbfuck.

Posted by: frito at July 17, 2008 01:23 PM (gIYgV)

32 Can we have a real third party now?

Posted by: Harry at July 17, 2008 01:27 PM (AWLIC)

33

Wow, it's a real Kangas-like troll!

Full of the bile and vomit from USENET, where Steve Kangas used to roam before blowing his brains out in Dick Scaife's bathroom. Miserably doing so, I might add, because he was drunk as hell and carrying a copy of Mein Kampf.

You're headed down that track son, slow down before it's too late.

Posted by: Rev Dr The Man E Buzz BigNuts at July 17, 2008 01:27 PM (sf4Oe)

34 Buzz, let him run, he's going to smack into the wall sooner or later. Might as well hit it hard enough to knock some sense into him...

Posted by: XBradTC at July 17, 2008 01:34 PM (pSXbN)

35

You're a real dumbfuck. - frito

The irony is strong with this one.......

You stay classy, frito. 

Posted by: wiserbud at July 17, 2008 01:46 PM (IHbof)

36 McCain isn't going to filibuster anything. It's too easy to call his bluff on something as exhausting as a filibuster. He nods out over the Early Bird down at the Olive Garden.

Posted by: spongeworthy at July 17, 2008 01:57 PM (a00go)

37 I like it.

Democrats renew the ban.  On September 30th.

Bush vetoes.  In October.

Dems do or don't override. In October.

Three times in four weeks before election day, Democrats tell the voters they can't have oil.


Posted by: richard mcenroe at July 17, 2008 02:02 PM (W9lfm)

38

Funny spongeworthy. But this ain't your grandpa's filibuster we're talking about. They don't sweat it out like Mr. Smith anymore - all McCain has to do is hold together a gang of 41 to block cloture.

If he can't pull that off - on this issue - Barry deserves to win.

Posted by: Andy at July 17, 2008 02:25 PM (MarbK)

39

Maybe I can fill up my gastank with little cute carebear dolls or daisies, I can pour daisies in my gastank, yeah man!

Posted by: Rev Dr The Man E Buzz BigNuts at July 17, 2008 03:05 PM (sf4Oe)

40

Will the Ralph L thingy work?

My thingy always works...at least when I'm alone.

Posted by: Ralph L at July 17, 2008 03:54 PM (vV7sA)

41 On the other hand, how many incumbent anti-drill dems (or repubs) would see re-election if the "no drill" ban is renewed by congress a mere month and a few days before the general election? I hope the "Green" sword is worth falling on.

Posted by: Big Daddy at July 17, 2008 04:30 PM (kxkm9)

42 By all means, please let the Democrats uphold the Ban in September! Then they can try to explain & defend their actions to angry working-stiff consumers until November...and beyond. If Pelosi and Reid force the extension of the moratorium, it will go a long way to showing many ordinary average Americans that the Democrats have no true interest in their well-being. Do it Pelosi, make your beloved lumpenproletariat and embittered Middle Class pay $4.50, $5.50, $6 per gallon at the pump. They will definitely remember you for it. As for me, I am still planning to vote for Republicans this fall...and I expect to have a lot of company. But I am also looking into securing a supply of torches while I sharpen my pitchfork, billhook, and halberd. It's not time for Revolution yet, but maybe we can have a Gasoline Party. 

Posted by: exdem13 at July 17, 2008 06:17 PM (fenBi)

43 It's like a child crapping his pants, then handing it to you; then wondering why you're upset really.

Outstanding!

Posted by: Mephistefales at July 17, 2008 10:02 PM (FSrBG)

44 Semicolon: the redheaded step-child of punctuation.

Posted by: Mephistefales at July 17, 2008 10:03 PM (FSrBG)

Posted by: 南京货架、" rel="nofollow">仓储货架。 at March 06, 2009 03:54 AM (rRj/C)

46 Hi all. The best way out is always through. Help me! There is an urgent need for sites: drug addiction treatment center. I found only this - drug addiction treatment centers. Christian drug and alcohol treatment centers help like minded substance abusers attain sobriety through biblical teachings, prayer and traditional recovery methods. Alcohol and drug treatment for high risk youth and their families. Thank :mad: Ayita from East.

Posted by: Ayita at May 19, 2009 03:09 AM (NNxYx)

47 随着我国物流业(货架)的快速发展,整个华东地区物流业托盘的发展也正以物流服务塑料托盘提升到较国内其他地区更高的地位而推进。重视具有提升区域物流托盘效率功能的专业化和标准化物流塑料托盘基础设施建设,打造整体物仓储笼流服务平台。南京海佩货架公司将积极推行物流仓储笼业标准化战略,建立健全仓储物流铁托盘服务标准化体系,加快推进物流铁托盘装备设施、信息系统、经营管理、服务提供等的标准化,打造最先进的仓储设备交易数码港,争取成为国内物流业标准化建设的典范。 近年来,我国物流业发展迅速,物流塑料托盘业增加值持续上升,已成为推动国家经济持续发展的重点产业。与此同时,物流仓储笼业面临运输和仓储钢托盘成本高昂、产业形态相互割裂等问题,亟需推行标准化战略,以降低成本,提高效率提升服务质量,满足产业提档升级的需要。” 南京海佩货架公司是对物流钢托盘标准化比较重视的公司之一,实施标准化的速度也块。在标准体系研究中注重与很多仓储笼公司进行合作,将重点放在标准的国际通用型上。目前,海佩已经提出了包括物流铁托盘模数体系、集装箱的基本尺寸、物流钢托盘用语、物流仓储笼设施的设备基准、输送用包装塑料托盘的系列尺术、包装用语、钢托盘大型集装箱、塑料托盘用箱、平托盘仓储笼,卡车车厢内壁尺寸, 铁托盘等。

Posted by: 货架 at August 27, 2009 06:51 AM (iLutp)

48 It is reported by the British "fashion" magazine website. Last week, louis vuitton canvas handbag with printed flower pattern has appeared in Europe. The pattern is created in 1888. In order to celebrate the 100th anniversary of British Louis Vuitton Selfridges store launched this exclusive plain canvas handbags (Damier Neverfull). Tiffany Jewelry This package is sold in Oxford Street and Manchester's Selfridges store in six weeks.This package was first introduced Tiffany Jewelry in the 19th century, while the classic shape of the Neverfull latest had been used is in the well-known Stephen Sprouse series. The second launch of plain square pattern is in 1996, including a complete series, there are handbags and small leather goods. It is proved that such printing can be endured, and Louis Vuitton Replica will have further development under the guidance of the creative Mark – Jacob.This handbag has three sizes, priced range from 380 to 430. The series includes some small leather goods

Posted by: LV at September 18, 2009 03:07 AM (0KIjA)

Posted by: shanghai massage at October 09, 2009 08:39 PM (eqMrT)

Posted by: cheap car insurance at January 06, 2010 07:56 AM (d8sQW)

Posted by: fjk at April 12, 2010 01:59 AM (eqMrT)

Posted by: دردشة at October 10, 2010 09:16 PM (KeYKJ)

53 Can we have a real third party now?

Posted by: pandora style beads at July 02, 2011 01:34 AM (6bs6Z)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






93kb generated in 0.0678 seconds; 50 queries returned 184 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.