November 18, 2009
— Purple Avenger In the USSR, this used to be known as a "show trial".
...I don't think it will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him, Obama told NBCs Chuck Todd...
WHEN, not "if".
IS, not "might be".
Being a law professor and all that, Obama fully understands the semantic difference between "when" and "if", and "is" and "might be".
The problem of course is that a jury in a civilian trial can be a real wild card, as it was in the OJ trial. They CAN and often do ignore compelling evidence if they get a bug up their ass about something the prosecution has done that chafes them.
KSM's "trial" is plainly going to be a show trial, but the real question is what "the show" is going to be about (and we all have a pretty good idea about what that's going to be), since its OBVIOUSLY NOT going to be KSM, since a military tribunal could have convicted and sentenced him to die a long time ago, saving the taxpayers a monstrously expensive spectacle.
The next question is if the Obama administration has intentionally setup a show trial for one man with a predetermined outcome and penalty, they've just proven they're OK with the notion of rigging civilian trials.
That is a pretty chilling revelation.
"...words matter..." -- Benjamin Cardozo
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
06:32 PM
| Comments (265)
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.
KSM's "trial" is plainly going to be a show trial, but the real question is what "the show" is going to be about (and we all have a pretty good idea about what that's going to be), since its OBVIOUSLY NOT going to be KSM, since a military tribunal could have convicted and sentenced him to die a long time ago, saving the taxpayers a monstrously expensive spectacle.
I mentioned this the other night. It's going to be the distraction that keeps on giving" for O'Bama. With our media, we'll have months of attention directed toward Bush and Cheney. No one will be looking at the shitsome cloaca that is the O'Bama administration.
Never let a good crisis go to waste. Corollary: Never let the opportunity for a good crisis slip by.
Posted by: John Smallberries (rdb) at November 18, 2009 06:36 PM (ykQCk)
These LIBTARD FRAUDS, so concerned that the world see's us giving people their due justice. That bad bad evil Bush didn't give them the justice that the world requires.
So what does the FLUNKY OBAMATRON do. He tells the world how he'll give them a FAIR TRIAL, then he'll HANG THEM.
Obama is complete fuck up.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 06:37 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Lopan at November 18, 2009 06:37 PM (Ddmk1)
The ENTIRE Opie Administration is inept, incompetant and so full of hubris that it makes me puke.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 06:39 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Robespierre at November 18, 2009 06:40 PM (rzJpR)
Posted by: enoxo at November 18, 2009 06:41 PM (+J6OV)
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 06:41 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: RightwingProf at November 18, 2009 06:41 PM (I8MPS)
Posted by: eman at November 18, 2009 06:42 PM (XuLw1)
With Obama yucking it up with reporters about his position as United States Superior Court Trial Judge and Jury, he has guaranteed the defendants will challenge the impartiality of the court and the contamination of the jury pool.
This arrogant fuck taught Constitutional Law?
Posted by: Fish at November 18, 2009 06:43 PM (6mfq0)
Posted by: Doc at November 18, 2009 06:43 PM (rzJpR)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 18, 2009 06:46 PM (H7Rlw)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 18, 2009 06:47 PM (0LbWa)
The worst thing about Obama is that people have to decide whether he is a nefarious Marxist or just the biggest fuck up of all time.
He is both. His intentions are to remake America into some fucked up JUVENILE idea of Marxist Utopia. But Obama isn't capable of pulling off a major conspiracy, so he just muddles along fucking up anything and everything he touches. And he considers that a success because after all the remaking of America as we know it, involves breaking down the old ways. Obama isn't even breaking down our old ways on purpose. He's just fucking up day in and day out. Obama thinks he is much much brighter than he is. In fact, Obama is not very bright at all.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 06:49 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Mastiff at November 18, 2009 06:49 PM (8dy/N)
Posted by: Palate cleanser at November 18, 2009 06:49 PM (m8pm6)
Posted by: eman at November 18, 2009 06:49 PM (XuLw1)
Posted by: Ghost in the machine at November 18, 2009 06:51 PM (m8pm6)
After Judge Obama altered the course of history by bringing the al Qaeda prisoners to America for the show trial, only Judge Wapner is able to read and interpret the law correctly to provide a fair outcome. Judge Judy, not so much.
Posted by: Fish at November 18, 2009 06:51 PM (6mfq0)
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at November 18, 2009 06:52 PM (H7Rlw)
Posted by: andycanuck at November 18, 2009 06:53 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 18, 2009 06:53 PM (0LbWa)
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 11:49 PM (MaqIC)
Nothing is scarier than a supremely self-confident imbecile with power.
Posted by: Cicero at November 18, 2009 06:54 PM (+AEJn)
I have concern for the agency operatives who will be subpoenaed to testify in public, and their names will be printed in the NYT and other liberal rags. This is a direct threat to the families and men who performed the interrogation services after receiving guarantees their actions were legal in accordance with current law.
Posted by: Fish at November 18, 2009 06:56 PM (6mfq0)
Nothing is scarier than a supremely self-confident imbecile with power.
Posted by: Cicero at November 18, 2009 11:54 PM (+AEJn)
No shit
Posted by: Caligula at November 18, 2009 06:57 PM (JL3qV)
Posted by: Lone Marauder at November 18, 2009 06:59 PM (p1iaB)
Their best option to keep their families safe is to resign and move to some remote location in another country using a different name and don't return until this bullshit is over and done.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 18, 2009 06:59 PM (0LbWa)
Posted by: oblig. at November 18, 2009 06:59 PM (aK/MY)
Posted by: SoCal Me at November 18, 2009 07:01 PM (lxEx/)
A normal person with an i.q. of 120 or higher, a person with a college education Ivy League, or flyover country or JUCO, would realize that bringing these TERRORISTS into America and trying them in our Federal Criminal System presents some INHERENT problems at first cursory glance.
Under our criminal code, the accused have MIRANDA RIGHTS. They also have the right to counsel before questioning. There are numerous other RIGHTS that the ACCUSED are afforded under our Criminal code, that were not OBSERVED vis a vis these "MUZZTARD" gentlemen.
ERGO, there are only 2 viable, reasonable, LOGICAL, conclusions that can be drawn.
1) Obama et al, the CLOWNS, who have spouted out nonsense about HABEAS CORPUS, etc....REALIZE that under our Constitution and Criminal code, granting these MUZZTARDS, alleged criminal status, these MUZZTARD gentlemen CANNOT BE CONVICTED CONSTITUTIONALLY.
OR
2) Obama, Holder and these hacks are as STUPID as a BOX of TAMPONS.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:01 PM (MaqIC)
That is a pretty chilling revelation."
...but don't waterboard them or torture them with green jello.
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:02 PM (Jyuxh)
Posted by: Senator Incitatus at November 18, 2009 07:02 PM (2qU2d)
If the Present really has the legal education he is purported to have, he must know that he's given the defense their 1st pre-trial motion: to dismiss the case. I mean, for fuck's sake- if the President of the United States goes on live TV and says a defendant WILL be convicted and WILL be executed, then what the fuck do we have a court system for?
This is insane. I sock-puppeted as 'caligula' above, but this is the sort of shit that Caligula did.
Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 07:02 PM (JL3qV)
Come on, gus. Tampons are useful.
Posted by: andycanuck at November 18, 2009 07:03 PM (2qU2d)
Posted by: Fish at November 18, 2009 07:06 PM (6mfq0)
Posted by: Soap MacTavish at November 18, 2009 07:07 PM (554T5)
Posted by: the slob at November 18, 2009 07:07 PM (i1+rx)
Remember, Obama was NOT a "law professor." He was a "lecturer." Anyone can be a "lecturer" -- she-who-shall-not-be-named with Teh Crazy, the stalker, was a "lecturer."
Posted by: Steck at November 18, 2009 07:08 PM (mdpsT)
SoCal, shipping the MUZZTARDS to the Netherlands, does not give Opie the chance to show how much BETTER and how MORALLY SUPERIOR in a EUROTRASH way Opie is. If you follow OPIES words and Rhetoric from JUMP-STREET, you'll realize that Opie thinks his PRETEND WORLD makes him a MORAL GIANT. His first EXECUTIVE ORDER. He is closing GITMO within a year. Nice idea Opie the FUCKTARD DIMWIT, welcome to the real world where MEN have to make decisions with REAL WORLD CONSEQUENCES.
The CHOICE of CIVILIAN TRIAL in NEW YORK, was calculated.
I Opie the big eared dimwit, will show the world how America SHOULD be.
Oooooops, then came the REAL WORLD CONSEQUENCES.
Obama isn't smart or mature enough to think these things through. He is an emotionally immature freak.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:08 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:08 PM (Jyuxh)
As to the show trial - the trial is for the prosecution to attack the US, so as far as the America-haters in the White House are concerned, it's cool. And, I don't see where you thought they would have any respect for the judicial system, anyway. The Precedent made a mockery of the eligibility issue (and got away with it, unbelievably) and has shown himself to have nothing but contempt for any and all of our institutions and traditions.
We are in the end game, here. Truly.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 07:10 PM (A46hP)
From A Man for All Seasons:
ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil the benefit of law!
MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
MORE (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on ROPER) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you--where would you hide Roper, the laws all being flat? (He leaves him) The country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast--man's laws, not God's--and if you cut them down--and you're just the man to do it--d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil the benefit of the law, for my own safety's sake.
I am not necessarily a tremendous fan of the American legal culture, either of the prosecutorial side or defense side. Each have their excesses, and increasingly seem to be defined by their excesses. I am not sure that some of the Warren Court decisions were essentially legislative decisions beyond the court's purview, and thus were bad decisions. I do believe that the American judiciary has grown to big for its britches and is increasingly viewing itself as Plato's guardians. And finally, I believe that for an average citizen, merely to be tried is a sentence in itself.
Thus, I say that I believe that this human creation, the American criminal justice system, has flaws, as all human creations do. But, I also believe that it is certainly, when compared to all that has come before, something that when the histories of the American Republic are written centuries hence, can be viewed as something to be honored for.
And thus, it is quite simple. If Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is tried in a civilian criminal court he must be given all the same procedural protections as any American citizen who so found himself charged by his government. This means that he should be released if he is acquitted, and that the standards of evidence and procedure the government must go through must be the same as for a domestic defendant. Otherwise, we will eventually cut a great road through the law to try men who should never be tried in that venue at all.
We need another system for accomplishing what are essentially imprisonment for reasons of state of international stateless enemies at war with us, and if one does not wish it to be made of military personnel that is fine, another system can be created, but it should not be the existing criminal justice system.
As we used to have separate Admiralty courts, and as we have separate tax courts, so we should have separate terrorist courts, operating on completely different standards, ones suitable for geopolitical affairs of nations fighting stateless enemies.
Posted by: Horatius at November 18, 2009 07:11 PM (m8pm6)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:12 PM (Jyuxh)
Posted by: Horatius at November 18, 2009 07:14 PM (m8pm6)
Jones, Opie is a graduate of both COLUMBIA (undergrad) and Harvard (J.D.).
He has the sheapskins from both Universities. Do yourself a big big favor. Look up/google and read Michelle Obama's Princeton THESIS.
It is abject sub-junior-high nonsensical racial grievance CRAPOLA.
Both Obama's are and were AFFIRMATIVE ACTION cases. Neither have EVER been challenged nor required to show any MERIT for the jobs they have held.
We've all seen the commercial where the Prom Queen is being named and it turns out to be a DOWN SYNDROME girl. Everyone cheers and claps because they have sympathy and empathy. That is Affirmative Action. That is the RACIAL GRIEVANCE culture. Being "Black" or whatever, is a substitute for MERIT. Long story short. Giving someone an Ivy League slot, grant-in-aid, scholarship or any other advantage merely because of the RACE checked off on the application has real world consequences.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:14 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Department of Affordable Insurance at November 18, 2009 07:14 PM (g2L90)
That's OK. For the past 10 months, we've had a "show" presidency, so it's all good.
Those big styrofoam Greek columns during Obama's DNC speech should have been a warning to us all.
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 18, 2009 07:15 PM (hoowK)
Is your delivery approach working?
You are preaching to the choir here, so to speak. So what are you doing to sway your contemporaries who voted for this bastard? If you could harness that passion, where and to whom would you focus it upon?
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 07:16 PM (ynZul)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 19, 2009 12:12 AM (Jyuxh)
Lady Lindsay did a nice job in the hearing, but don't forget that Lindsay also voted YEA on Holder's confirmation - against all reasonable opinion and request. Anyone with a brain knew that Holder was a total POS without a brain who hated America almost as much as The Precedent, but Lindsay still wanted to "get along" and voted him in. Next, Lindsay will be trying to smack down Sotomayor for some insane opinion she gives, when, again, it was Lindsay whose vote was necessary to get Sotomayor, the great Empathizer and non-user of adjectives - to a vote in the judiciary committee.
I'm with you on Lady Lindsay's latest performance, but what led up to this is mind-blowing.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 07:18 PM (A46hP)
Choosing Manhattan lets Obama and Holder look tough by demanding a death penalty they know they'll never get from a jury. Perfect cover.
Posted by: Strick at November 18, 2009 07:19 PM (93CPh)
Unless KSM's lawyer knows about YouTube and watches this starting at 1:50.
KSM's lawyer: Your honor, my client was never read his Miranda rights...
Judge: Case dismissed.
Posted by: AndrewsDad at November 18, 2009 07:19 PM (Z0ivH)
Posted by: andycanuck at November 18, 2009 07:19 PM (2qU2d)
Plus, if there is no conviction Obama is fucked.
Posted by: gau at November 18, 2009 07:22 PM (n1uMU)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 19, 2009 12:18 AM (A46hP)"
Oh, totally agree. Graham's a POS , in my mind, but I enjoyed the moment between him and Holder today. But, you're right,,Holder slid into office on Graham's slimey backside.
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:23 PM (Jyuxh)
Jim Geraghty has the same view, Strick, re. the death penalty.
That's because in the feds' few past tries at the death penalty for foreign terrorists, they lost. And New York juries are seen as among the least likely to agree--unanimously, as the law requires--on execution.
[story link at Just One Minute]
Posted by: andycanuck at November 18, 2009 07:23 PM (2qU2d)
Prettypink, Opies cadre of dishonest hacks is not completely stupid.
Emanuel and Axelrod, are manipulative, power hungry, bullies and they plot a strategy that does not completely MELD with what Obama wants.
The attempt to RIP and DESTROY.....FOX...was completely thought out and was a very disturbing STRATEGY. It failed. But what it did do for those like me who are as smart as Opies hacks, and who are very observant, was to give a glimpe into how FOR KEEPS these motherfucking dead serious hacks play.
The Joe the Plumber episode should ring a bell.
The twin HACK brain trust of Axelrod and Emanuel have no interest in the policies as much as they are the NO HOLDS BARRED CHICAGO STYLE WRECKING CREW. They do not necessarily share OPIES JUVENILE MARXIST FANTASY, but they do share his POWER, and they share the CASH that the future brings for them. It's not an ideology for the Axelrod/Emanuel Chicago-thug-ocracy, it's the power, cash, control and all that comes with it.
Both Axelrod and Emanuel are Jews. There is no way that they completely understand Obama. They are mercenaries. It's about power and the access to the highest echelons on earth.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:24 PM (MaqIC)
Is anyone sure about this? He was captured in Pesharwar. Do we really know if he was or was not read his miranda rights? My husband said that he heard a general state today that he was indeed read miranda.
Anyone?
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 07:25 PM (ynZul)
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:25 PM (MaqIC)
The words that Obama and Holder use are disturbing; so disturbing that it sounds like a case can be made to dismiss all charges against KSM.
Perhaps Holder learned something from the Philadelphia NBPP case walk-away, specifically that he needs a reason to walk away.
What are the chance that Holder's going for some sort of "tampering" / "tainted jury" dismissal option?
Posted by: Arbalest at November 18, 2009 07:25 PM (Ym9lj)
Posted by: gau at November 18, 2009 07:25 PM (n1uMU)
I always said that as horrible as Bush was (in my view), he'd be resurrected by history, much as Truman, Eisenhower, and a number of other presidents were.
I never realized it'd be this quickly for so many Americans (myself included).
Show trials go against everything America stands for. The only thing worse would be for our leader to bow to royal . . .
I'll stop there.
Posted by: The Q at November 18, 2009 07:26 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: Truman North at November 18, 2009 07:27 PM (XH/G8)
You beat me to the point. How could they ever go to trial, after having granted KSM protection under the bill of rights? He was never Mirandized, he incriminated himself under torture, etc. Holder's response to Graham suggests to me that this decision is the product of a dangerous admixture of stupidity, incompetence, and hubris.
Posted by: Milesdei at November 18, 2009 07:27 PM (FS9ko)
Say what? You wanna rephrase that?
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:29 PM (Jyuxh)
I agree. He basically wanted to say "Don't worry your pretty little head about it, Daddy will take care of everything." and this is how it came out. But he also can't allow anything but a guilty verdict in the trials a the same time.
Posted by: gau at November 18, 2009 07:29 PM (n1uMU)
You're so polite -- in my head, it went more like "STFU, I won. It goes like I say it goes."
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:31 PM (Jyuxh)
Andrews Dad, therein lies the problem that any moron could have foreseen.
Opie the dimwit, grants the MUZZTARDS American criminal justice status.
IN doing so, the CHARGES NECESSARILY MUST BE DISMISSED.
If not, the HOLY PICTURES Obama is posing for, R-NOT-SO-HOLY.
So Bush thoughtfully AVOIDED any giving non-Geneva Convention battle-field TERRORISTS either CIVIL RIGHTS or GENEVA CONVENTION protections, RATHER, Bush and his ADMIN, when faced with a REAL WORLD PROBLEM, thought it through. LIBTARDS NEVER DO.
Mr. G.W.BUSH (praise be unto him), chose the path of POW/terrorist combatants. LIBTARDS SHIT THEIR PANTS in POLITICAL POSTURING ANGER.
And here we are with OBAMA and another FUCK UP.
Who does Obama's FUCK UP serve????
anyone?
Beuhler??
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:34 PM (MaqIC)
Obama and Holder are just (as usual) talking out of their respective asses.
And they are so deluded, that they think that they are actually sounding tough -- hey everybody, look at us, look how tough we are . . . we're tough, real he-men, don't want to mess with us because we're real ass-kickers, that's how tough we are. It's all posturing and metrosexual muscle-flexing. But they really expected the public to buy it.
The problem is -- the whole world knows that they are just a couple of pussies.
Posted by: Bender at November 18, 2009 07:34 PM (FDZUn)
Posted by: joeindc44 at November 18, 2009 07:36 PM (ZvwTS)
My point is that I appreciate your passion, as I, too want to yell and break dishes and throw knives, as you appear to be doing, but is this working?
Just what the hell are we going to do about this? Can someone come up with something effective, constructive, on target? This is an outrage.
I guess, Gus, I was hoping you were young and could sway a million 18 year olds to storm congress. They like 'em young. Us old ones are so much soylent green, ya know.
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 07:36 PM (ynZul)
Prettypink? Why would I rephrase that? Emanuel and Axelrod are both Jews.
Nothing Obama espouses is favorable or even any way palatable to the cause of Israel or Judaism in any way shape or form.
Why do you think my words are controversial??
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:37 PM (MaqIC)
I would think the use of the enhanced interrogation techniques on KSM would come into play as well--which means the government would have to have evidence on him from sources other than his own statements--which they probably have, and will have to present. Thus, members of the jury without security clearances will get access to information and methods that otherwise would never go outside the government, and then, despite all injunctions to the contrary, it may be a matter of only time and money before someone interested in how we nabbed KSM finds out how it was done--all on the QT. Unless, of course, the government proposes to surveil indefinitely members of the jury.
In addition, the use by the government of the Enhanced Interrogration Techniques may play a role in the sentencing, as a reduction item. I am no lawyer, but I am able to understand the logic of the system well enough to know that if this was a domestic crime, like Timothy McVeigh, I would wonder why some of what the government has done would not get the case thrown out. For example, the right to "fair and speedy" trial has been trampled on, for it certainly has not been speedy; and his guilt has been asserted to the public time and time again via government assertion that he has given information of value--information that was compelled from him, in violation of the Bill of Rights.
Look, I have no problem with the corporal of the guard, in between rounds, taking him out and having the boys shoot him, before they finish policing the area for the evening. He should be tried in a tribunal of some sort, that acts in a manner less encumbered by the criminal court procedures that are designed to guard against governmental tyranny against private citizens.
The tribunals should be more Solomonic in nature, concerned more with ascertaining that the man in front of them is in fact the man sought and has more than likely done the thing charged with. War is hell, after all, and this is a war. Period. It is not a police action. It is a war by a group of individuals attacking a state with the hopes of one day creating their own state, and should be treated as such.
Posted by: Horatius at November 18, 2009 07:41 PM (m8pm6)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:43 PM (Jyuxh)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 18, 2009 07:44 PM (Jyuxh)
Posted by: Inspectorudy at November 18, 2009 07:44 PM (Vo1wX)
Derak, Nice post. Touche. I love your passion too. I've done and do MORE than you could know, but I'm not the young dude that you thought I was. I am active and I evangelize as a CONSERVATIVE in many ways shapes and forms. Derak, I live in BLUE-Wisconsin, and I will be part and parcel of the Wisconsin revolution that is about to take place.
I grew up a Democrat, and I rejected the illogical, emotional, dysfunctional, dishonesty that I recognized in the Democrat Party. I am 100% sure that the DemoLIB party is a cesspool, and I jumped the ship before the infection became terminal.
I know my Congressman, Jim Sensenbrenner, and I'm pleased with virtually every issue he votes on. He is a "leader" if Republicans can claim to have any.
I also know my former Congressmen including current Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. I've known Tom for DECADES. Tom is running for Governor....AGAIN. He was WI legislator, US Congressman, lost at Governor, WON as Milwaukee Mayor. He is running for Governor again.
He is a CAREER politician. 3 PENSIONS. Trying for 4.
Politics should not be a 4 time career for ANYBODY.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:44 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Milesdei at November 18, 2009 07:44 PM (FS9ko)
Thank you Pretty pink, good food for thought.
Here is my take.
Emanuel and Axelrod are both Jewish.
Obama's philosphy and his history is CLEAR. Obama does not like Israel.
In fact, Obama calls himself Christian. There is ZERO evidence that OBAMA is Christian. I'm not claiming that Obama is Muslim, but he CLEARLY has a soft spot for ISLAM. His responses to FORT HOOD are Icing on the cake.
Emanuel and Axelrod, did not sign on for that. Obama's proclivities CLEARLY fly in the face of the interests of ISRAEL and JUDAISM.
Emanuel and Axelrod are not mercenaries BECAUSE they are JEWISH, the are MERCENARIES and OBAMA'S ANTI-ISRAEL stance is obvious.
Emanuel and Axelrod did not sign on for that, nor have they jumped ship.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 07:49 PM (MaqIC)
depends on the meaing of "when" and "if" and "is"
that came from another famous lawyer, I believe, who was disbarred in his own home State...
Posted by: Flapjawman at November 18, 2009 07:51 PM (Opt3j)
It is a clash of civilizations, in other words. I see no way to combat this unless and until our government acknowledges the reality. And given our culture of "diversity", this will not happen anytime soon. It has taken a generation to get to this level of insanity. It won't change overnight without a massive, uh.... firestorm. And I fear that as well, because these communists foment civil war to break down the status quo in order to build their new paradigm. Tread verrrrry carefully.
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 07:51 PM (ynZul)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 18, 2009 07:54 PM (zmiSr)
Posted by: eldeuce564 at November 18, 2009 07:58 PM (S2vPs)
KSM should not be executed. This is what he wants, it will make him a martyr and rally his supporters a lot more out there. I say put him in isolated solitaire confinement, no human contact for 20 years. No books, no TV, nothing. Once he goes in, never mention his name again. This would be the worst punishment.
This whole trial will be one giant grandstand for KSM and the Islamofascists.
The media will lap it up like dogs. The end result? I predict a near - dismissal because a lot of evidence against him can't come out lest the compromise the intelligence.
He already, publically and freely, before his capture, admited being behind the murder of thousands of innocents.
So, I guess I diverge here and have to ask, why a trial in the first place?
The problem for the US legal system is there is no provision to deal with Combatants who do not fight with a uniform. Technically, these guys do not fall under ANY Geneva Conventions protections (way to long to post here, so look it up and read the details), anyway, so why bother with the whole legal circus?
Posted by: Flapjawman at November 18, 2009 08:01 PM (Opt3j)
Posted by: 29Victor at November 18, 2009 08:02 PM (AfPnb)
Derak, the reality is that ISLAMOFASCISTS attacked America because they had ISLAMOFASCIST grievances.
If a KKK unit attacked a MOSQUE or a JEWISH SYNAGOGUE or TEMPLE, ................would THEIR GRIEVANCES be .....CONSIDERED or even contemplated??
Notice that KKK units do not and have not caused murderous HAVOC for whatever their ridiculous grievances might be.
What we have here, is the LIBERAL mind set, that those who commit EVIL, surely cannot be evil. Only Ronald Reagan, Rush Limbaugh, George W Bush and Sarah Palin are evil and worthy of HATE and SCORN. Furthermore, anything these NICE PEACEFUL MUSLIMS did, was CAUSED by the DREAMS OF MY FATHER!! errrr, I mean, caused by GEORGE BUSH.
Less than 5 minutes after the second WTC tower was hit by Flying Muzztards who had SLIT 115lb Stewardesses throats for their GOD ...ALLAH....., I called my dysfunctional, failure, unhappy , Libtard older brother. I said..."maybe this attack on America is what will bring us all back TOGETHER". (less than 5 minutes after 2 GIGANTIC BUILDINGS within 5 blocks of my Grandfathers former office sat).
My unhappy brother said. "I HOPE NOT'.
I learned about LIBTARDS that day.
There is no middle ground with LIBTARDS. If you don't abide. They hate you.
I'm still standing.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:04 PM (MaqIC)
I've played the "what can I live with" game for the last 9 months. Socialism? communism? where do I draw the line? What am I willing to die for?
I am quite certain we are at one of those crossroads of history.
I think I'm going for the woods to organize the resistance.
Come 'n get me, fkkers. I dare ya.
Then again, I could just settle down and watch TV. It ain't that bad, right?
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 08:07 PM (ynZul)
Is anyone sure about this? He was captured in Pesharwar. Do we really know if he was or was not read his miranda rights? My husband said that he heard a general state today that he was indeed read miranda.
Anyone?
IIRC, when he was taken into custody, he said he'd talk to the American's in New York, via his lawyer. Clearly, any court would see that as a refusal to speak without the presence of counsel. And having requested counsel, any and all statements (and any and all evidence uncovered as a result of any statements) would be suppressed at trial.
Posted by: XBradTC at November 18, 2009 08:12 PM (y0E9v)
Derak, how old are you and what is your life situation.
I'm not a wall flower, and I'm not saying that I need to collect canned goods yet, BUT, I have considered a new gun etc.
I believe, and I am obviously able to express my beliefs logically without being too emotional, that Obama is not honest. He is not capable, and a more finite notion is that Obama does not RESPECT our Constitution, nor does he have ANY INTENTION or "supporting and defending" our Constitution if circumstances and oppurtunity dictate otherwise.
Obama is not honest. He is not wise. He is not a good person. Obama does not love America as it HAS existed.
I've heard for years the LIBTARD derisive query.... "Are you questioning my Patriotism" and my answer has always been.
FUCK YES, I QUESTION EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:14 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: pat at November 18, 2009 08:20 PM (BvvsZ)
XBradTC, any LIBTARD who has witnessed any COP SHOW, would realize that a CRIMINAL SUSPECT, having the MIRANDA rights neglected and not read specifically in any and various languages, will have his case thrown out summarily.
Obama and Holder are even smart enough to realize this.
Supposing the Miranda and 5th amendment right abrogations are IGNORED because of the SEVERE nature of the CRIME.................... Wouldn't this INJUSTICE make Opie the DIMWITS' attempt to REHAB a ROGUE AMERICA a complete farce in the WORLDVIEW, rendering this a KANGAROO COURT and a laughing stock WORLDWIDE???
What is the BEST CASE SCENARIO based on OBAMA/HOLDERS CLOWNISH logic??
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:22 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: Robespierre at November 18, 2009 08:23 PM (rzJpR)
If there were any rational judges in Manhattan, it would be:
Scumbag Lawyer: Your Honor, my client was not read his Miranda rights.
Judge: If your client is Khalid Sheik Mohammed, of the Al Qeda organization, this court's function is only to identify him. If he is KSM, he has no rights under the Contitution. If he is KSM, then he is to be remanded to a Military Tribunal as directed under the Rules and Customs of War, given a hearing and executed by hanging within a day. It is my desire to append to these court minutes my strong recommendation that his rotting body not be cut down from the gallows for three years, all while having a herd of diseased pigs fed under his dripping corpse. These pigs, if healthy, should be periodically injected with pathogens and parasites and hand-fed to every one of his living compatriates we have in custody until they themselves are hanged like dead meat.
Your curious recitation of an irrelevant fact is noted. In exchange, I will tell you that my toe itches. Now shut up.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at November 18, 2009 08:27 PM (g+0JJ)
Gus- we're mid aged kidless, fit and in a relatively remote mountainous location of the country near the Canadian Border. We're geared up to be able to move in any terrain, any weather, and we're flush. Owe no one nuthin.
These islamofacists are the greatest threat we will ever face. I feel really bad for the urban areas. I'm not sure they will see what is happening until it literally explodes.
Back to the tv. Calms the nerves, ya know. (it's not so bad,it's not so bad, it's not so bad, it's not so bad.............)
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 08:27 PM (ynZul)
Posted by: Sparky at November 18, 2009 08:29 PM (mXY2a)
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 08:31 PM (ynZul)
As gus mentions, there are two big problems for the prosecution...
1. Miranda Rights
2. KSM taking the 5th
Not sure taking the 5th is where KSM wants to go, but if you consider no Miranda rights, plus the "torture" used to extract evidence (which will probably not be admissable) and his initial guilty plea (again, provided under duress), it looks like the prosecution is screwed straight out of the box - full stop.
If he wasn't interested in having a platform in front of a world audience, taking the 5th would seem like the way to go- puts the entire burden on the prosecution, who can't use any of the evidence because of the way it was acquired or it would reveal our methods.
The incompetence of this administration is simply astounding.
Posted by: KLL at November 18, 2009 08:31 PM (/5Axw)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 18, 2009 08:33 PM (Y50nj)
So much for the guy being "smart", eh?
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 18, 2009 08:34 PM (jV9DU)
Nothing is scarier than a supremely self-confident imbecile with power.
Posted by: Cicero at November 18, 2009 11:54 PM (+AEJn)
Isn't that term "active stupid?" I'd much prefer he was lazy stupid.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 08:39 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:39 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 18, 2009 08:40 PM (AH8nd)
Posted by: Drew in MO at November 18, 2009 08:40 PM (Y50nj)
No, Obama's abject incompetence as a leader was readily apparent to those who were paying attention long before this.
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 18, 2009 08:45 PM (hoowK)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at November 18, 2009 08:48 PM (C/nOv)
Can somebody tell me why anyone thinks this douchebag is smart?
Yeah, he went to Columbia and Harvard. Stupid ol' Bush went to Harvard and Yale. Bush was a legacy, Bambi was an affirmative action admission.
Do we have any objective evidence that Bambi is the most smartest asshole ever to think he could lower the oceans?
Posted by: FUBAR at November 18, 2009 08:49 PM (fstYb)
Posted by: gau at November 18, 2009 08:50 PM (n1uMU)
I'm honestly astounded that Holder and Obama would try to do this.
The public expects this guy to be charged, tried, convicted, and executed, and the sooner the better.
So now we're going to have a trial that is either (a) so obviously rigged that one might as well use Sergio Beria's biography of his father to swear in witnesses or (b) subject to a succession of evidentiary 'gotchas' that are going to take two points off Obama's beauty-contest numbers every time something goes against the prosecution.
I really do not understand the motivation here. Maybe Holder thinks he'll use the trial as an expository forum on the evils of the Bush War on Terror. Maybe he thinks this is somehow good for NYC. Regardless, he's marching off into terra incognita, an environment of great uncertainty where the possible upside is quite limited but the potential for surprises damaging to this administration is quite great.
Posted by: mrkwong at November 18, 2009 08:52 PM (G8Eo0)
A peak into the future of non-Obamaton Americans.
Posted by: baldilocks at November 18, 2009 08:52 PM (TnySH)
Nice job by Lindsey Graham, though. About a thousand more such performances, backed by votes in the Senate, and he will be almost back to even. Doubt he'll have the time, though, between fetching McCain's coffee and changing his Depends.
Posted by: Adjoran at November 18, 2009 08:57 PM (jmoP/)
KSM should not be executed. This is what he wants, it will make him a martyr and rally his supporters a lot more out there.
I'd refer you to, of all people, Tom Clancy (paraphrased). "Martyrs all have one thing in common. They're dead."
With a few notable exceptions, martyrs are hugely overrated. It's been three years since he was blown up, but when was the last time anyone mentioned Abu Musab al-Zarqawi?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 18, 2009 08:58 PM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: KLL at November 18, 2009 08:58 PM (/5Axw)
The Uber-Yutz has set himself up for the inevitable question: if KSM et al deserve a trial in criminal court, what the FRACK is he doing hunting down and killing his KSM's Buds with Predators???
Do we identify Mafia hitmen in the US , for example, and send in SWAT teams (or Predators, for that matter) to blow them unawares into tiny, bite-sized chunks for their German Shepards to gobble up?
But if we don't kill them , they are entitled to full Constitutional Rights?
Whaaaaa?
Posted by: effinayright at November 18, 2009 09:10 PM (7M8Py)
Posted by: torabora at November 18, 2009 09:49 PM (1kr99)
Posted by: baldilocks at November 18, 2009 09:52 PM (EMFNM)
Posted by: vaeriax at November 18, 2009 09:52 PM (jM7jR)
I don't know, let me think.....YES!!!!
Posted by: baldilocks at November 18, 2009 09:54 PM (EMFNM)
Posted by: Eric at November 18, 2009 10:01 PM (Qc/s6)
Posted by: whoreofzion at November 18, 2009 10:03 PM (0d3p4)
That's the bestest part of this whole thing if you ask me!
Posted by: Cass Suntein at November 18, 2009 10:08 PM (aVzyR)
97
My guess is that they're heavily relying on a Pakistani newspaper interview a year before KSM's capture where he admits his involvement AND relying on lesser jihadis to help convict in the hope of lighter sentences.
Still, a major screwup all around. With military tribunals, none of this circus atmosphere would clog up the procedings.
Posted by: The Q at November 18, 2009 10:10 PM (pfStM)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 18, 2009 10:13 PM (AH8nd)
They regard both as mere Kabuki diversions put on to pacify the mewling masses. Outcomes predetermined by powerful insiders gaming the system.
Posted by: Deety at November 18, 2009 10:17 PM (aVzyR)
You're so polite -- in my head, it went more like "STFU, I won. It goes like I say it goes."
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at November 19, 2009 12:31 AM (Jyuxh)
I think it was more like, "Who the f*ck do you think you are, asking me a real question? Don't you know that you, as a member of the media, aren't supposed to challenge my omniscience and celestial wisdom?"
Posted by: stuiec at November 18, 2009 10:33 PM (Uhh69)
Posted by: West Coast Quincy at November 18, 2009 10:45 PM (okKow)
Posted by: vaeriax at November 18, 2009 10:59 PM (jM7jR)
Posted by: West Coast Quincy at November 18, 2009 11:16 PM (okKow)
Posted by: SuperCool at November 18, 2009 11:19 PM (chNlj)
So, Holder has no legal grounds on which to convene trials, nor does he care. Another article implied that Obama is already planning to throw Holder under the bus if this doesn't work. Regardless, both the Secretary and the President are guilty of breaking the law here.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 18, 2009 11:22 PM (zmiSr)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 18, 2009 11:35 PM (zmiSr)
I'm looking for a link, but so far haven't been successful. I remember someone saying it during a press conference, they were asked what the troops were doing with the prisoners and the answer was simply that they weren't equipped to deal with any.
Posted by: GreenGasEmissions at November 18, 2009 11:37 PM (yIZpi)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at November 18, 2009 11:46 PM (zmiSr)
Posted by: scar at November 19, 2009 12:06 AM (+zrXF)
I could see a jury of people fed up with Obama's shit letting KS M go free just to embarrass him.
Actually, no I can't. But I could see a libtard jury doing something like it to embarrass Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: Roy at November 19, 2009 01:04 AM (l3/Io)
Posted by: Drider at November 19, 2009 01:11 AM (aZn+0)
Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2009 01:20 AM (xCBQ4)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 18, 2009 11:53 PM (0LbWa)
Not if his first ruling is that the court lacks jurisdiction and remands them to the US military for trial as unlawful combatants under the only relevant treaty we have signed.
Posted by: Jean at November 19, 2009 01:25 AM (xCBQ4)
One of several big lies told about candidate Bowrack Bowbama. This idiot doesn't know his legal ass from a hole in the ground. He could not, if his Presidency depended upon it, successfully file and try a vanilla criminal case or civil case in the US District Courts, nor could he teach s/o else how to do so.
He has a law degree, which he was awarded in the interest of diversity. That's it. He's a fraud, and a dumb one, as is his AG Eric "the Red" Holder.
Posted by: les grossman at November 19, 2009 01:53 AM (Vc/xe)
At this point the purpose of a civil trial appears to be one/combination of the following.
1) Put Bush/Cheney on trial; as an academic corollary put pre-Obama America on trial.
2) Overturn the 200 year (?) precedent of military tribunal for war criminals, thus undermining an element of Western jurisprudence.
a. Redefine war criminal.
3) Prep the ground for withdrawal in A-stan by condemning the behavior of the war apparatus/government that initiated that war.
4) Release identity of CIA/military interrogators (so ACLU types no longer fear legal retribution) and methodology so BO can have a legal-political justification to cease all terrorism prevention measures currently underway.
5) Give the mastermind behind the event a soapbox to voice jihad, which will run parallel to BOs rhetoric of the US hegemon-demon.
a. Expect a litany of ACLU/Jeremiah Wright-esque soliloquies from the defense on why KSM was lashing out in righteous anger at the evil US.
6) Set the precedents governing trials of extremists for future domestic use.
7) Make a mockery of the civil court system and thus the Constitution. This occurs with both conviction via show trial and acquittal by the 9/11 mastermind walking.
a. Doubly so by the prosecution of the USS Cole bomber, et al. by military tribunal, political double standards, ambiguous law, etc.
Possible endless distraction for the other hands to work.
The left wanted a Nuremberg for Bush-Cheney and I think this is BO giving it his best shot. This is Cloward-Piven in the legal sense I think. Or else BO and Holder are two of the dumbest, most venal men to ever hold public office. The outcome is the same.
Posted by: MRI at November 19, 2009 01:54 AM (7Rx4w)
Posted by: drjohn at November 19, 2009 01:55 AM (HXRkG)
Posted by: MRI at November 19, 2009 01:58 AM (7Rx4w)
Pop, he was summoned by his bankers. It got little notice here, but Reuters reported that the Chicoms told him that, as the biggest holder of US dollars, which are sinking like a stone, they are very concerned about his spending spree and specifically about how he intends to pay for his health care program. Even the fucking Chicoms aren't buying the bs about Obamacare.
Posted by: les grossman at November 19, 2009 02:00 AM (Vc/xe)
That's just it, if any of these 5 are acquitted, they do walk. The District Court will order the the gov't to release them. It won't be Holder or Obama's call to make at that point. Once they haul KSM into a District Court, the Court decides what happens after acquittal, and what happens is clear--the acquitted defendant is released. Obama/Holder could expel KSM from the US on immigration grounds, but they would not be able to send him back to GITMO. Sen. Cornyn made this point in the Holder hearing yesterday--the District Court will reason that, having elected to put KSM in the regular criminal justice system they are not constitutionally free to disregard the verdict. No Neverminds, No Do-overs. Holder, the dumbass, said he was sure that would not happen, but could cite to no legal authority for his conclusion.
Show trial is not the worst thing that happens here. Show trial followed by the release of KSM (by putting him on a plane out of the country) is a predictable outcome. Only a pair of world class morons would run that risk. Thanks so much, 52%.
Posted by: les grossman at November 19, 2009 02:12 AM (Vc/xe)
139 Make a mockery of the civil court system and thus the Constitution. This occurs with both conviction via show trial and acquittal by the 9/11 mastermind walking.
All it will take is one juror to say/do something stupid and you have a mis-trial...and the long painful process will begin all over again, long after BO is gone.
Posted by: dananjcon at November 19, 2009 02:37 AM (pr+up)
When in the 57th State of Harvard this is what the Ivy-Inbred define as 'serving justice'; they rig everything, trials, budgets, degrees...whatever it takes to rule the world.
END TENURE: STOP IVY-INBRED INDOCTRINATING STUPID OCCUPATION!
Posted by: syn at November 19, 2009 02:37 AM (ZjEOd)
Clinton would figure in the defense of mass murderers? Will Hillary be put on the stand tio talk about the "vast left-wing conspiracy"?
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 19, 2009 02:39 AM (ympAm)
The next question is if the Obama administration has intentionally setup a show trial for one man with a predetermined outcome and penalty, they've just proven they're OK with the notion of rigging civilian trials.
That is a pretty chilling revelation.
What about that is a "revelation?" We already know they have no trouble rigging elections. Why would they hesitate to rig a trial? It wouldn't be the first time the Left attempted it. Of course, typically they prefer to avoid the need for a trial and would rather just shoot people in their homes. The only "trial" the libs like is a trial in the media - where they get to pick the verdict in advance and ruin lives with impunity.
What surprises me is that any conservatives are still surprised. The "czars" appointed by this president are proof enough that Stalinism is in his blood. If it weren't for the fact that so many Americans (especially on the Right) are armed, the mass disappearances would have already begun.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 19, 2009 02:55 AM (P+HSn)
1. As noted before, this is a head fake to distract attention from health care, cap and trade, etc. While everyone is paying rapt attention to the trial, the Dems will make a full-on assault with their agenda.
2. This is about putting Bush and Cheney on trial. I guarantee they will be subpoenaed, probably by the defense. The whole issue of "torture" will be used to bash them about the head. They will probably throw in a dollop of "illegal war."
A third benefit would accrue if KSM is acquitted or otherwise released. Obama will look good to the Muslim world. Also, he can blame it all on Bush/Cheney and their "disregard for human rights." Sadly, there are enough stupid people in this country to fall for that.
Posted by: Steve L. at November 19, 2009 03:07 AM (Gkhxf)
So, how do you say "No justice, no peace" in Arabic?
Posted by: FireHorse at November 19, 2009 03:18 AM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 19, 2009 03:21 AM (0GFWk)
Clinton would figure in the defense of mass murderers? Will Hillary be put on the stand tio talk about the "vast left-wing conspiracy"?
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 19, 2009 07:39 AM (ympAm)
Ha! That was the first thing that popped into my head when I read this...
Posted by: loppyd at November 19, 2009 03:31 AM (UJIeT)
RE: The jury pool.
1) The 217 people who have valid drivers licenses/voting records in NYC have jobs, and will be able to get out of jury duty. If they don't the new taxes will bankrupt them.
2) The $17/day, plus free lunch is the most money these jurors have ever made legitimately.
3) The publishers will wire these zombie pricks, for a book deal. Written by Ayers. Which is probably ready to go to the presses already.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 19, 2009 03:31 AM (ABUF9)
Not so; the jury in the OJ case was NOT a wild card. That trial was essentially over as soon as the idiots filed the charges in downtown L.A. instead of Brentwood where the murders occurred.
If they had filed in Brentwood, O.J. would be on deathrow awaiting execution now after sentencing by a largely white jury. By filing in L.A. they guaranteed a jury made up of blacks who hated the L.A. police department, a jury who is made of people reminicent of the average Obama supportor like "Peggy pay my rent", and a jury who would jump on ANY excuse what so ever to declare him not guilty. The O.J. verdict was a clear cut case of jury nullification.
But, that is not to say that hauling KSM to NYC is not a huge mistake as well. a jury pool of mixed military in a military tribunal is much more likely to enter a logical and valid verdict in a terror trial than the average jury pool in NYC.
Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2009 03:50 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at November 19, 2009 04:01 AM (7Gs5S)
If this becomes a jury trail they will need to get 12 New Yorkers who either don't know about or who have forgotten about 9/11.
That means the jury will be all Democrats.
Posted by: Crusty at November 19, 2009 04:01 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: nickless at November 19, 2009 04:07 AM (MMC8r)
Libtards: THIS IS WHAT "ERODING THE RULE OF LAW" LOOKS LIKE.
The AG and POTUS just assured the nation of the outcome of a civilian trail. What can you say now if the Feds haul your ass to court and proclaim "There's no way you're getting off here."
Oh, and have fun detaining an acquitted man, Libs. Very evil-like, wouldn't you think?
Posted by: Techie at November 19, 2009 04:16 AM (cxW4X)
Will KSM get a jury of his peers?
For KSM to be convicted, at all, the jury has to come to a unanimous decision.
If KSM gets a jury of his peers he only needs one Muslim on the jury and PSHT!... it's a hung jury.
No Muslim would risk being ostracized by his community, or worse, by taking part in an infidel trial and convicting a fellow Muslim.
Wondering about whether KSM will get the death penalty is putting the cart before the horse now that "the Won" is giving him a civilian show trial.
Posted by: Speller at November 19, 2009 04:17 AM (7Ldd7)
The more I see/think about this mess (the impossibility of retroactively granting KSM his rights, Obama basically decreeing the verdict before the trial, Holder's ties to a Jihadi-defending Law firm, etc.), the more I hope that there's a backdoor out of this thing.
If it proceeds as scheduled we're in for a long national nightmare.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 19, 2009 04:18 AM (OyQiK)
I'll add the following: there is a real chance that KSM will be acquitted here. Given the quite possible inadmissibility of key pieces of evidence against him or jury non-cooperation, this actually could happen.
Then what? Team Obama is going to send him back to Guantanamo (or more likely whatever domestic facility is functionally identical, but with a different name)?
I think at that point, Obama would HAVE to let him go.
If Obama isn't willing to let KSM go free if found innocent, then why the hell is he having a trial?
Personally, I think KSM is a POS who should be executed by military tribunal, but if he *IS* found criminally not guilty, then I think he has to be released. Any other outcome makes a complete mockery of the US judicial system and the Obama administration.
Of course SHOULD he be released, that makes a complete mockery of the US effort against terrorisms.
Lose-lose. . .which is why this criminal trial is stupid.
Posted by: looking closely at November 19, 2009 04:19 AM (PwGfd)
Forget that angle. All you need to throw the jury is one Truther.
Reporter: Why did you vote for acquittal?
Juror: Because the Mossad did the attacks. Haven't you seen Loose Change? And why did all those Jews stay home that day from work? Google it!!
God Save The Republic.
Posted by: Techie at November 19, 2009 04:21 AM (cxW4X)
Forget that angle. All you need to throw the jury is one Truther.
How about just an Obama Cultist?
"If we release him, it will show the world America is a place of love, and they will love us again..."
Posted by: nickless at November 19, 2009 04:30 AM (MMC8r)
WormerBama dropped "the big one".
Is this a Federal Case? Can we import some people from Appalachia? Shouldn't there be 12 people from 12 different states?
Stupid q's I know. Just sayin'.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 19, 2009 04:30 AM (hGvWz)
I'll add the following: there is a real chance that KSM will be acquitted here . Then what?
Then the federal government can step in with different charges, something like 100 counts of violating people's civil rights. The beauty of that is that they can do that 30 times, in case they mess up the first 29 prosecutions.
Posted by: FireHorse at November 19, 2009 04:39 AM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: Tantor at November 19, 2009 04:44 AM (SWvPS)
Whatever considerations were taken into account when making this decision they had nothing to do with rationality, or logic, or law and justice; they were basely political calculations at best.
But hey, at least the lawyer's guild will be happy!
Now the prosecution gets to fight to get a Muslim, or a truther, or a Code Pinko, or some other flavor of idiot onto the jury. Where are they going to find a person who has not already formed an opinion about 9/11?
Posted by: Voluble at November 19, 2009 04:53 AM (nZNTl)
He is being tried in NYC. Here is the applicable district:
Welcome to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This Federal Court has jurisdiction over and summons jurors from the counties of New York, Bronx, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Orange, Dutchess, and Sullivan.
Posted by: Vic at November 19, 2009 05:02 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: cmblake6 at November 19, 2009 05:07 AM (zSq+X)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at November 19, 2009 05:38 AM (z4es9)
The number one question for Holder and especially Teh Ø: If the civil court system is so great at 'getting terrorists' WHY is fuggin BILL AYERS out there saying 'GUILTY AS HELL, FREE AS A BIRD????????'
Posted by: Schwalbe at November 19, 2009 06:01 AM (UU0OF)
Good question, Schwalbe.
Because it's 'historic'? (Historically stupid)
I'm sure the Mainstream Fringe Media will demand a non-evasive answer from their boyfriend president.
Attorney General Eric Holder may probe Bush-era "torture," but terrorists... no so much.
Posted by: oldhardhead at November 19, 2009 06:38 AM (HOEF/)
Posted by: Mad King Obama at November 19, 2009 07:17 AM (wAQA5)
Posted by: dustydog at November 19, 2009 08:07 AM (XHOAD)
Posted by: Publicserf at November 19, 2009 08:15 AM (J+bl5)
Posted by: kansas at November 19, 2009 08:16 AM (i0WE5)
Capt. Redleg: " They WERE treated decently. They were decently fed, and then they were decently SHOT".
Posted by: TXMarko at November 19, 2009 09:10 AM (2oiAV)
KSM and his buddies will walk, there is no doubt about that. All his lawyers have to do is make sure there are 3 or more Muslims on the Jury. No Muslim will side with the infidels, and 3 will be enough to intimidate the other jurors into voting not guilty no matter the evidence. After all, no one wants to end up like Danny Pearl.
The only question is, how does this benefit Obama? After all, he is making sure this will be the outcome.
Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at November 19, 2009 10:51 AM (7HL8W)
I give it two years before he fucks up and outs himself as a Muslim.
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 19, 2009 01:55 PM (ZP+gj)
Posted by: массаж at December 10, 2009 06:16 AM (8/ov4)
Jennifer Love Hewitt Picture Gallery
Sexy Madonna Picture Gallery
Britney Spears Picture Gallery
Posted by: ben at January 16, 2010 01:43 AM (v0Dku)
Posted by: fghf at March 13, 2010 01:21 AM (c7cTF)
Posted by: rc toys at March 25, 2010 02:38 AM (qfsCH)
Posted by: coach bags at April 26, 2010 08:00 AM (Vaw23)
Posted by: Jacob at April 28, 2010 06:02 PM (oJZYr)
Posted by: Mark at May 06, 2010 07:15 AM (6DZhO)
Türkiyen en güzel tatil oteller hakkında geniş açıklamalı bilgiler popüler oteller ve bilgi kaynakları mevcut
Saç dökülmesi ve saç bakımı hakkında genel haberler doğal bitkisel külrer ve en son uygulamalar.
Lazer ile ilgili bilgiler lazer epilasyon ve diğer yeni yöntemler cilt güzellği ve estetik konuları
Hamilelik ile ilgili her türlü konu hamile kalmak isteyenlere genel tavsiyeler. hamilelik portalına bekleriz.
Ev dekorasyonu yaptırmak ve ev dekoru hakkında faydalı yeni bilgiler. Dekorasyon bilgi sitemiz
Posted by: dekorasyon at May 07, 2010 02:29 PM (hczDC)
Posted by: Toronto Tile Installation at May 11, 2010 10:19 PM (38+qj)
Posted by: dghdf at May 13, 2010 10:23 PM (YxMyi)
Posted by: Jamey at May 31, 2010 06:39 AM (vUEsD)
Posted by: Scholarship at July 01, 2010 01:00 AM (ebUmS)
visitors will find that very useful.
vps hosting | hosting | ucvhost
Posted by: Herry at July 08, 2010 06:49 AM (8kq3l)
Posted by: dddddddddd at July 13, 2010 12:59 AM (zfiei)
SAMSUNG Camcorder Battery
Posted by: dddddddddd at July 13, 2010 01:00 AM (zfiei)
HITACHI Camera Battery JVC Camera Battery EPSON Camera Battery
Posted by: dddddddddd at July 13, 2010 01:01 AM (zfiei)
logo - design
Posted by: jenny at August 24, 2010 03:39 AM (u33GK)
What is TiVo? And whats the function of it? TiVo is a digital video recorder device; it can help people to record and filter through television programs in easiest way. There is another nickname for TiVo is Google in television industry. When you record some favorite TV shows and you wan to enjoy then with your iPad, a Mac TiVo to iPad Converter is necessary for you. This TiVo to iPad Converter for Mac provides the easy and proved solution to convert TiVo files to MP4 for use on iPad or AVI, MPEG, and WMV media formats for use on iPod, iPhone and many others.
MKV stands for Matroska video, Matroska is the extensible open standard Audio/Video container like avi, mp4, mpg, asf, rm, and mov. When you convert MKV to iPad mp4 on Mac OS X Leopard, a powerful and professional Mac MKV to iPad Converter program which can convert MKV to MP4 format perfectly. With easy conversion procedures, it makes MKV to iPad MP4 conversion routine very simple.
Mac MTS to iPad Converter
WMV to iPad Converter for Mac
Posted by: goodymary at September 06, 2010 08:37 PM (VDfJR)
Posted by: travesti at September 26, 2010 02:46 PM (tODMq)
Posted by: Anonymous at September 29, 2010 08:20 AM (fgLcB)
Posted by: bubles at October 21, 2010 08:27 PM (ygYRs)
Posted by: prince at November 20, 2010 02:19 AM (TdD91)
Thanks for another informative blog. Where else could you obtain this information is written so perfect? I have a project that I am now working, and I realized that information.
Posted by: Office 2007 Standard Keygen at November 23, 2010 11:40 PM (1/aEF)
<a href="http://www.enjoy-watches.com">replica watches</a>
<a href="http://www.vertuphoneshop.com">vertu</a>
Posted by: jojo at November 28, 2010 08:17 PM (UwmvH)
oil painting art frame tmall.com
Posted by: tmall.com at December 17, 2010 02:34 AM (JwaUL)
Posted by: shixian at January 15, 2011 10:14 PM (1FYRm)
Posted by: custom caps at January 19, 2011 11:02 PM (xuypn)
Posted by: หนังโป๊ออนไลน์ at February 23, 2011 08:34 AM (bq6Qj)
Posted by: Anonymous at March 01, 2011 07:31 PM (wW3uo)
Posted by: idm ถาวร at March 07, 2011 07:18 AM (24/6c)
and Support for Javahostindo Web Hosting Indonesia
Posted by: Agriculture at March 11, 2011 03:55 AM (d2fKQ)
Posted by: ipod to mac at April 06, 2011 01:25 AM (vZ+Yk)
Posted by: how to transfer songs from ipod to itunes at April 06, 2011 06:48 AM (kfyJW)
merapakistan-free web encyclopedia is one of the largest information base website in pakistan,pakistani web directory ,every thing about pakistan.
Posted by: Mera Pakistan-Free Encyclopedia at April 11, 2011 11:48 PM (Ig2SA)
Muslim Matrimonials | Asp.Net Ajax Chat | CCTV Cameras UK | Access Health Care
Posted by: JamesD at April 13, 2011 05:14 AM (mm+r5)
Posted by: canvas art prints at April 14, 2011 09:27 AM (3cTsd)
Posted by: hollister uk at April 21, 2011 03:31 AM (1N/z1)
Posted by: Jack Wills at April 21, 2011 03:32 AM (1N/z1)
Posted by: Jack wills outlet at April 21, 2011 03:32 AM (1N/z1)
Posted by: Jack Wills at April 21, 2011 03:33 AM (1N/z1)
Posted by: auto insurance quotes at April 27, 2011 10:12 AM (226Aj)
Posted by: laser cutter at May 09, 2011 08:12 PM (2gSgT)
Posted by: asus vh242h at May 24, 2011 04:40 AM (bPnJP)
Posted by: occasion dresses at June 30, 2011 09:08 PM (jSSiL)
Additional products and services can be provided. Many manufactures that incorporates laser cutting into their process find this business opportunity. Laser cutters are capable of creating complex shapes with fine detail that are beyond the capability of even the smallest saw blade.
Posted by: laser cutters at July 03, 2011 10:53 PM (OUkEH)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:48 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:51 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:53 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: Echo at July 14, 2011 10:58 PM (LC6K2)
Posted by: Echo at July 14, 2011 10:58 PM (LC6K2)
Posted by: คลิบงูกินคน at July 17, 2011 07:10 PM (IwD23)
Posted by: Jeans Online Outlet at August 04, 2011 10:34 PM (uJnZB)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at August 06, 2011 12:50 AM (JcxoV)
Posted by: เที่ยวสิงคโปร์ at August 08, 2011 04:37 AM (d2y+f)
Posted by: asdfa at August 29, 2011 09:55 PM (TPLgL)
Posted by: asdfa at August 29, 2011 09:57 PM (TPLgL)
Posted by: canvas prints at August 30, 2011 11:47 AM (VcNiG)
Posted by: canvas prints at August 30, 2011 11:50 AM (VcNiG)
Posted by: pertersonlan at September 08, 2011 03:17 AM (qR6DK)
Posted by: Hans at October 14, 2011 01:49 AM (NPkvM)
<p><a href="http://www.onepearls.com/pendant-jewelry/c15/index.html">freshwater pearl pendant</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.onepearls.com/pendant-jewelry/c15/index.html">wholesale pearl pendant</a></p>
Posted by: lewis at October 24, 2011 04:43 AM (Gwk6c)
wholesale pearl earrings
shell pearl earrings
gemstone earrings
freshwater pearl pendant
Posted by: lewis at October 24, 2011 04:44 AM (Gwk6c)
Posted by: Royal Herbal Online Store | Buy Online Herbal Products at October 25, 2011 08:12 AM (BOli/)
That we win.sbobet does not mean that we are winning and we lose in sbo I do not mean that we lose as well. THANK...YOU.livescore | 7m | ผลบอล
Posted by: sbobet at November 08, 2011 02:28 AM (7IU0B)
Posted by: xingguang at November 22, 2011 01:29 AM (fq12q)
dominos coupons and kfc menu
Posted by: dominos coupons at December 06, 2011 06:55 PM (HmexN)
Moreover, we could offer Hematology Analyzerforanalyzingthe blood cell of patients,ECG for testing the occurrence of cardiac excitability, propagation and recovery process,and Medical Ventilator forcontrolling or changing people's normal physiological breathing.
Posted by: medical-x-ray at December 12, 2011 02:13 AM (THa9j)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at December 18, 2011 02:58 PM (y7lGT)
Posted by: hath80 at December 19, 2011 09:25 PM (ef97d)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 07, 2012 09:33 PM (M7WRF)
Posted by: Chicago divorce law at January 11, 2012 07:44 AM (mm+r5)
Yearning for trendy looking even under the cold weather? cheap north face would be your choice. The great warmth and comfort offered guarantee you to gear up for cold-weather work or play.Now you can buy north face products online,you can find cheap northface jackets much cheaper.There is no reason to look dowdy in the cold weather with this fabulous buy.
Posted by: cheap north face at January 13, 2012 09:12 PM (I38MY)
Read more:http://za-bata.exteen.com/20111024/entry#ixzz1jRPvowqr อักษรพิเศษ
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 14, 2012 09:05 AM (Ny8Th)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 22, 2012 09:50 PM (ZUGtt)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 25, 2012 02:55 AM (xA1c1)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 27, 2012 12:56 PM (L0M88)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at February 02, 2012 02:14 PM (525qI)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at February 11, 2012 10:41 AM (XKr/U)
Posted by: aasdfa at February 12, 2012 12:30 AM (kCaQr)
Posted by: aasdfa at February 12, 2012 12:32 AM (kCaQr)
Posted by: aasdfa at February 12, 2012 12:33 AM (kCaQr)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









