October 30, 2009
— Dave in Texas This time aimed at Edmunds.com, who pointed out yesterday the Cash for Clunkers program was a clunker.
We're being governed by a bunch of emo pukes.
From the White House blog:
On the same day that we found out that motor vehicle output added 1.7% to economic growth in the third quarter the largest contribution to quarterly growth in over a decade Edmunds.com has released a faulty analysis suggesting that the Cash for Clunkers program had no meaningful impact on our economy or on overall auto sales. This is the latest of several critical analyses of the Cash for Clunkers program from Edmunds.com, which appear designed to grab headlines and get coverage on cable TV
MOM! THE CAR GUYS TOOK THE LAST PIECE OF BIRTHDAY CAKE!
I suppose this is the kind of reaction you'd expect from people whose job is to make shit up and sell it as something it most certainly is not. And a lot of numbskulls who buy into any Obama plan (because it's from His Awesomeness) will surely pump their little fists in the air and say "Yeah!", but they really don't need convincing, do they?
I'm just a moron, but I think Shakespeare's point was something along the lines of protesting too loudly kinda makes you look bad.
MISSED THIS: LauraW and techie point out the sophisticated high-brow rhetoric in the piece really shows those Edmunds guys they're all wrong.
In other words, all the other cars were being sold on Mars, while the rest of the country was caught up in the excitement of the Cash for Clunkers program..Edmunds.com, on the other hand, is promoting a bombastic press release without any public access to their underlying analysis.
So put on your space suit and compare the two approaches yourself:
Whining truth to power.
via eddiebear over at H2, where the MOM! thing is a bit of a running gag, which I'm more than happy to swipe.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
04:28 AM
| Comments (89)
Post contains 340 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: ACORN Cash for Pimps and Teenage Hookers at October 30, 2009 04:37 AM (sOtz/)
here's the thing: cash for clunkers cost more than it was worth. and even more than that, it accounts for about 1/2 of the GDP rise this past qtr. And we won't have this auto "spike" next qtr. So this GDP rise is artificial.
Everyone in Congress needs to come home.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 30, 2009 04:38 AM (TEIZr)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 30, 2009 04:40 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: Mao Tse Tung at October 30, 2009 04:41 AM (sOtz/)
Wait a sec - there's cake and nobody told me?!?
Betcha its that red velvet shiznit, too. I always miss that stuff.
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at October 30, 2009 04:42 AM (lDdA/)
I'm waiting to see what the retail numbers look like through Black Friday from the likes of Wal Mart, Target, etc. If consumers are spending money on bigger-ticket stuff (like computers and TV's), I'll think the economy is trending back up. If not....
Posted by: Monty at October 30, 2009 04:42 AM (4Pleu)
GMAC apparently is the walking dead.
Posted by: Techie at October 30, 2009 04:43 AM (cxW4X)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 30, 2009 04:44 AM (TEIZr)
Posted by: milton waddams at October 30, 2009 04:46 AM (PD1tk)
It won't surprise me if they do some kind of Cash for GM Cars Only bullshit next time.
Posted by: BigWyo at October 30, 2009 04:48 AM (mT7uC)
Me thinks Rent-a-'Bam should be able to solve the deficit and the Cash for Clunkers debacle. We rent Obama to a bidder for a day for the rest of his term. Obama could shower his narcisism on someone else and he can be away from our sight for the rest of his term. That should provide enough dough for tax cuts to create real jobs.
They should replace Geithner with moi.
Posted by: eating narcissus at October 30, 2009 04:48 AM (4FkTt)
Posted by: Ezra Merkin at October 30, 2009 04:48 AM (EbpbH)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 30, 2009 04:48 AM (+FzLa)
Posted by: CUS at October 30, 2009 04:48 AM (wOGfT)
There's one in the Obama Energy Restriction and Tax Bill (euphemistically known as "cap and trade"). Is there another one?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 30, 2009 04:49 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: eddiebear at October 30, 2009 04:49 AM (zKxel)
Posted by: Techie at October 30, 2009 04:50 AM (cxW4X)
that cake smells bad
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 30, 2009 04:50 AM (vp1Pc)
The 'Mars' and 'spacesuit' schtick in particular is 100% 7th-grade peevishness.
The chicken, it will not fuck itself, guys. Time to hustle!
Posted by: lauraw at October 30, 2009 04:50 AM (GOg89)
the largest contribution to quarterly growth in over a decade
More lies from the AHs in the WH. I seem to recall some 7.5% rises during the Bush years.
Posted by: Vic at October 30, 2009 04:50 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: trailortrash at October 30, 2009 04:51 AM (2Z+7j)
Any nation that has banks that were not heavily exposed to the alt-a and subprime mortgage industry in the United States are doing quite well. They are creating jobs at this point. PIMCO is now talking about the Fed starting to pull out of propping up US housing stock. Rates will go up.
This 3rd quarter growth is a Chicago rouse. What tricks will there be to play up 4th quarter numbers?
Posted by: WTFCI at October 30, 2009 04:52 AM (EbpbH)
Posted by: Meghan McCain at October 30, 2009 04:52 AM (Zis4D)
I was present in the United States. The United States employs two hundred million people. Ergo, I created/saved/did not flush two hundred million jobs.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama at October 30, 2009 04:53 AM (4FkTt)
Posted by: dogfish at October 30, 2009 04:54 AM (ov3Hi)
Posted by: mystry at October 30, 2009 04:54 AM (kmgIE)
Posted by: Pointy Haired White House aide at October 30, 2009 04:55 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: wHodat at October 30, 2009 04:55 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Waterhouse at October 30, 2009 04:55 AM (Do9Eu)
Posted by: Joe Wilson at October 30, 2009 04:56 AM (lDdA/)
Posted by: Government Rendition of an Eddie Izzard Joke! at October 30, 2009 04:56 AM (rzJpR)
-- Posted by: BigWyo at October 30, 2009 09:48 AM (mT7uC)
That would surprise me a bit. Congressional Dems in the Rust Belt proposed a "Buy American Provision" when C4C was originally considered. That would be viewed as a straight-up Smoot-Hawley trade-war measure. Foreign nations would respond with tariffs and other similar actions.
Having said that, none of the leading Democrats in DC seems to know anything about failed (or enormously counterproductive) economic policies from the past, so why not?
Posted by: Beagle at October 30, 2009 04:57 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Olberdouche at October 30, 2009 05:00 AM (Zis4D)
Maybe...but they're not loaning money out, or at least not in the amounts that small to medium-size businesses need them to. They're continuing to hoard cash, which is not a good thing for the economy going forward. Given that a lot of job creation comes from businesses with 250 employees or less, not being able to get business loans is very bad news.
Unemployement is always touted as being a "lagging indicator", but there's reason to believe in this particular case that the unemployment numbers may be chronic -- that is, that the jobs lost won't be recovered later on when the economy improves. Many of the jobs lost were lost in the blue collar sector: construction, services, manufacturing. And many businesses are simply eliminating those positions -- either by automation or by reallocation (moving overseas, cutting product-lines, whatever). The early 1980's unemployment was erased (and then some) during the huge tech boom, but there's nothing like that on the horizon right now. Entrepreneurs can't get seed money to start up firms, which means that there's no potential for later exploitation of new technologies (biotech, especially).
Posted by: Monty at October 30, 2009 05:00 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: DrSteve at October 30, 2009 05:01 AM (t+B7A)
There's going to be the holiday shopping which props up numbers a bit. What I read though, the retailers are expecting real bad news.
Posted by: CUS at October 30, 2009 05:01 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: wHodat at October 30, 2009 05:02 AM (+sBB4)
Pie = su*ck.
Cake = goodness
Red Velvet Cake = Multiple hookers, val-u-rite Vodka, & assorted rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and Methodists.
Good stuff, that is.
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:04 AM (GFlNV)
Posted by: Jean at October 30, 2009 05:10 AM (tTdaQ)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 30, 2009 05:11 AM (JK1hx)
Posted by: Robert Gibbs at October 30, 2009 05:11 AM (4Kl5M)
If the cake isn't chocolate, you're a racist.
Or maybe you're a racist if the cake is chocolate. Let me check with Jeremiah and get back to you.
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 30, 2009 05:11 AM (Kg/sh)
"Vice Principal Williams is counting the number of loud lunchroom groups. Well, maybe he should try the lunchrooms on MARS. LOL!"
Posted by: Techie at October 30, 2009 05:12 AM (cxW4X)
Posted by: Geithner & Summers at October 30, 2009 05:17 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: kim in vancouver, usa at October 30, 2009 05:20 AM (WBfk9)
"Auto sales dropped dramatically following the September 2 end to the Abwrackprämie, which offered Germans 2,500 to scrap their old cars and buy new models.
A comparison of 60 car model prices by Auto Motor und Sport found that car manufacturers were offering an average of 21 percent off. Opel dealers offered the highest discount of 42 percent for their old Astra model...."
At least C4C 'only' cost billions, and not a trillion -- the new billion. I remember when a few billion seemed like a lot of money to spend on something wasteful and counterproductive. I must be old.
Posted by: Beagle at October 30, 2009 05:21 AM (sOtz/)
Cake? Raaacist? Nevar!
Oh... "bake" does sorta kinda (in a flakey way) sound like "race", so maybe....
Guess we'll have to go with Bake Free* products from now on.
* - otherwise known as "no bake", as in cookies (a fond memory for us of the *ahem* experienced generation...
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:22 AM (GFlNV)
Speaking as someone with a severe chemical reaction to Red Dye #40, red velvet cake is the incarnation of pure evil in pastry form.
Now Devils' Food -- that there is some good stuff.
Posted by: Joanna at October 30, 2009 05:23 AM (gJQTg)
Posted by: Joanna at October 30, 2009 05:25 AM (gJQTg)
Got this from my brother-in-law
Q. What is an Economic Stimulus payment?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.
Q. Where will the government get this money?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is giving me back my own money?
A. Only a smidgen.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment?
A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set,
thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?
A. Shut up. Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the US economy by
spending your stimulus check wisely :
If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money
will go to China .
If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs.
If you purchase a computer, it will go to India .
If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico , Honduras and
Guatemala .
If you buy a car, it will go to Japan or Korea .
If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan .
If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go to management
bonuses and they will hide it offshore.
Instead, keep the money in America by :
1 spending it at yard sales, or
2 going to ball games, or
3 spending it on prostitutes, or
4 beer or
5 tattoos. (These are the only American businesses still operating in the US .)
Conclusion : Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you met at a yard sale and drink beer all day
Posted by: Mike H at October 30, 2009 05:27 AM (LdYLm)
Ah, not to get too far off (this is a MilBlog, after all), but "red dye # 40"????
WTF?
Any good cook from below the M-D line would sooner watch the feckless fools on the food channel than use dye in a true Red Velvet.
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:28 AM (GFlNV)
Posted by: Joanna at October 30, 2009 05:32 AM (gJQTg)
Posted by: ignorant northerner at October 30, 2009 05:32 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:33 AM (GFlNV)
Posted by: zombie Vaudeville comedian at October 30, 2009 05:36 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Joanna at October 30, 2009 05:37 AM (gJQTg)
2. Edmunds also ignores the beneficial impact that the program will have on 4th Quarter GDP because automakers have ramped up their production to rebuild their depleted inventories.
Major automakers including GM, Ford, Honda and Chrysler all increased their production through the end of the year as a result of this program, which will help boost growth beyond the third quarter. The actions of private market participants, who would not increase production if they didnt think demand for their product would be there through the end of the year, is a far better indicator of market dynamics and one that Edmunds.com conveniently ignores.
This is pure fantasy. Car makers didn't ramp up crap. They were sitting on so much excess inventory it's ridiculous. If this worked out as they suggested does that mean they won't be closing all those dealerships? If you believe this car sales will just keep booming so much they will need them.
If these carmakers really did increase prodcution for the 4th quarter then the entire management should be fired. There isn't an economist in the country who think car sales are on the increase.
Posted by: Rocks at October 30, 2009 05:37 AM (Q1lie)
Joanna, you need some new recipes.
A true Red Velvet is made with traditional (not "Dutch press") chocolate which turns a deep reddish brown when cooked w/vinegar & buttermilk. For a good final touch of color, spoon in a bit of beet juice into the batter.
Trust me, there's no dye anywhere near my Red Velvet cakes. Just soft, moist, chewy goodness.
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:39 AM (GFlNV)
Posted by: the wiseguy who started it at October 30, 2009 05:42 AM (4Kl5M)
"Shakespeare's point was something along the lines of protesting too loudly kinda makes you look bad"
More accurately, if you protest in a dramatic or drawn-out way, you're probably hiding something / lying. Which makes you look bad, yes, if someone is perceptive enough to catch it. Whereas if you're speaking truth it's likely straightforward. If you're referencing Hamlet. Methinks.
Posted by: isostan at October 30, 2009 05:42 AM (isLP4)
Posted by: Portal Player at October 30, 2009 05:42 AM (Q1lie)
Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming...
Rocks @ 57 is correct. No automaker is "ramping up" a da*n thing.
CfC could've had a decent impact in one way - if the approved "car" list had been banged up against inventories - but that didn't happen.
All it did was to move sales from one time period to another. Nothing more, nothing less.
PS... well, not quite true - a # of dealers (bad, evil Rethuglicans all) took it in the *** since CfC "payouts" have been slim or none.
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:44 AM (GFlNV)
A business owner yesterday on Glenn Beck complained about lack of credit lines for small business. This will snowball...
Posted by: Mike H at October 30, 2009 05:46 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 05:47 AM (GFlNV)
One thing is for sure. Sales per dealership will explode upwards. I wonder when they'll use that metric.
Posted by: CUS at October 30, 2009 05:48 AM (wOGfT)
I, um ... Jess, I think I love you. *wipes away tear*
Seriously, I saw Paula Deen make it once (my mom watches her, don't judge me) and the batter looked like house paint. It made me twitchy just looking at it.
Vive la cake of truthiness!
Posted by: Joanna at October 30, 2009 05:50 AM (gJQTg)
This is pure fantasy. Car makers didn't ramp up crap. They were sitting on so much excess inventory it's ridiculous. If this worked out as they suggested does that mean they won't be closing all those dealerships? If you believe this car sales will just keep booming so much they will need them.
The funny thing is that the data clearly shows car sales dropped dramatically after C4C ended; in other words, demand was pulled forward so sales in the 4Q are going to be down as well.
The whole program was a moral hazard on so many levels. Any car in the program had to be crushed and have its engine destroyed, instead of letting the dealer either clean it up and resell it, or recycle it for parts. Americans who owned their current car free and clear added even more debt to their ledgers; I'd love to see the repo stats on these cars within a year, because high unemployment is going cause many people to default. And all indicators right now show that Christmas is going to be very rough this year; consumer confidence is in the 40% range right now. Since all the excess inventory is gone now, for the most part, dealers will have a hard time pushing any new vehicles they get on their lot by the end of the year, so the chances some dealerships close up next year are pretty damn good.
Overall, the whole criticism from the administration is so childish; Edmunds is a respected site that's helped a lot of people make decisions on their car purchases, in no small part to the consumer reviews that are posted. That the White House would even pick a fight like this shows what a bunch of thin-skinned propogandists they are. It's doubly ridiculous because the administration's counter-claims aren't even remotely accurate.
Posted by: David Axelrod's Combover at October 30, 2009 05:53 AM (/Pw+r)
The same trick works for the home buyer credit. The fallout from creating even more debt is yet to be seen, but I know that bankruptcy might be the place to practice for the next few years.
Posted by: Alex at October 30, 2009 05:58 AM (udP2l)
Posted by: Jess at October 30, 2009 06:16 AM (GFlNV)
Posted by: Steve L. at October 30, 2009 06:17 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 30, 2009 06:30 AM (r8/Km)
Posted by: exdem13 at October 30, 2009 06:44 AM (lYKj1)
Posted by: Texmom at October 30, 2009 06:54 AM (WzN8I)
Same result, but isn't the thought process more like "well, I can get this done overseas cheaper, and since this recovery seems like a debt-financed house of cards, better to do that than hire real workers"
I don't think there will be a recovery until Obama and Pelosi are sufficiently neutralized to rule out deathcare taxes, and crap+trade taxes. And that means no recovery, at the very least, until a year from now; election day, a year from now.
And Pelosi's and Reid offering yet another deathcare bill isn't helping; it looks dead, and then gets up again...
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 30, 2009 07:16 AM (aYS5W)
Au contraire--everything Obama's gang of marxists does is enthusiasically approved by at least half the electorate--including Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi. If Obama announced a program to flat-out *give* a house and car to everyone in the country, half the people would praise it as a brilliant idea. The MSM would gush about how Obastard "really cares" about people--unlike those evil, hard-hearted Rethuglicans.
Lest you think this is hyperbole: Look at the praise Ogabe has won for programs that are nothing more than government giving cash to potential voters. Cash for clunkers, mortgage subsidies, mortgage renegotiation to easier terms, and now socialized medicine--all government giveaways.
Of course it never occurs to the recipients to wonder where the money comes from--as one welfare queen remarked, "it's Obama's money."
Far too many people believe you can get something for nothing.
And the rest of us are willing to play by their rules and let them run the country.
I've about had enough of that, thanks.
Posted by: sf at October 30, 2009 07:34 AM (xz5dP)
Democrats: The White House! And you're unpatriotic if you don't!
America: Are you serious?
Posted by: jimmuy at October 30, 2009 07:38 AM (EzcbY)
Posted by: Crusty at October 30, 2009 08:26 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: goy at October 30, 2009 09:20 AM (+Gze8)
What next? Chastising TV Guide for providing listings of Fox shows?
Posted by: Y-not at October 30, 2009 09:24 AM (sey23)
I traded in a 12 year old GM clunker that needed more work than it was worth to get roadworthy again, for $4.5K towards a new Toyota pickup. I owned that clunker outright, and paid cash for the new truck, so I own it debt free, too.
Thanks for the subsidy morons!
Posted by: TacoDriver at October 30, 2009 12:18 PM (ZBeai)
Posted by: siman at October 30, 2009 12:30 PM (x6i61)
The thing that got me is that rather then just repeating the line that the program was a success the DOT guy had to attack Edmunds. This is true in all liberal arguments, there not based primarily in facts but in partisan hate and attacks.
"It is unfortunate that Edmunds.com has had nothing but negative things to say about a wildly successful program that sold nearly 250,000 cars in its first four days alone," said Bill Adams, spokesman for the Department of Transportation.
This really is a government of whiners and children, top to bottom!
David
Posted by: LifeTrek at October 30, 2009 12:36 PM (tJTIW)
Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 12:25 AM (wYEI1)
ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. cheap hosting company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. windows vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customer price.
Posted by: Mark at May 10, 2010 04:46 AM (6DZhO)
Posted by: giubbotto moncler at December 19, 2010 09:53 PM (cahNN)
Posted by: herman198 at March 10, 2011 01:15 AM (tnRWG)
Posted by: herman198 at March 14, 2011 09:22 PM (bUUy/)
Posted by: ipod to mac at April 14, 2011 07:15 AM (ecKmC)
Posted by: mercedes benz at May 02, 2011 12:46 PM (EpyjS)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









