June 28, 2008

McCain And Obama Address The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials
— DrewM

McCain addressed immigration policy in his speech today and gave his normal comprehensive reform and enforcement talk. More telling, I think, was his answer the question, one of the two or three questions he received on the issue, "...will comprehensive immigration reform, and not just enforcement, be one of your top policy priorities in you’re first 100 days in office"?

It will be my top priority yesterday, today, and tomorrow. And my friends, thank you for the question, and let me just review for you again, we tried. I reached across the aisle to Senator Ted Kennedy, and by the way I know that he’s in your prayers, and we worked in bipartisan fashion. And we were defeated. And by the way, it wasn’t very popular, let’s have some straight talk, with some in my party, and so I did that and worked together so we could carry out a federal responsibility. We have to secure our borders, that’s the message. But we also must proceed with a temporary worker program that is verifiable and truly temporary, we must also understand that there are 12 million people who are here and they are here illegally and they are God’s children, they are God’s children and they will be treated in a humane fashion based on the principle obviously that someone who comes here legally cannot have priority over someone who comes here illegally.

(note-I saw the speech live and the last line was clearly just an innocent flub, though you may of course draw your own conclusions on the nature of the slip)

I hate this formulation. I don’t think we should be trading enforcement for amnesty in some grand compromise. Let’s get enforcement first and see how it works for a few years and see where we are then. Perhaps attrition will work and make the problem more manageable. If we can't get an enforcement only plan, let's run on that in the 2010 mid-terms. I don't say that meaning I just want a political issue, I want good policy and if that means waiting an election cycle to do it, so be it.

Either way, I think the idea that people who came to this country illegally should be rewarded for that, at the expense of people who are playing by the rules and waiting to come here is unacceptable. Ultimately, that's what 'comprehensive reform' boils down to.

And Maverick…cut the ‘God’s children’ crap. No one claims that those here illegally aren’t ‘God’s children’. Of course they are and should be treated with basic decency. But being a child of God doesn’t exempt them from the consequences of their actions anymore than it does a citizen or legal immigrant.

There are complaints when there over immigration raids or laws that lead to people leaving the US. Yes families are often separated and it’s sad when that happens but the same thing happens when citizens are arrested. Families are torn apart and lives are disrupted. Why is it a greater tragedy when it involves people who made the choice to come here illegally?

You can say being here illegally isn’t really that big of a deal but there are a number of crimes that citizens are prosecuted for all the time that would fit into that category as well. Yet their lives are turned upside down and their families impacted. Should we stop enforcing those laws as well?

McCain doesn’t seem to see enforcement as a good in and of itself, rather it’s just something to trade off to get what he wants…comprehensive reform, aka amnesty.

Yeah Obama is as bad if not worse on the issue. So?

Sorry to be Mr. Immigration guy the last few days but it's the big political story of the day. BTW- Obama addressed the same group today and took a shot at McCain on the issue.

I know that he talked about that when he just spoke before you, but what he didn't mention is that when he was running for his party's nomination, he walked away from that commitment. He said that he wouldn't even support his own legislation if it came up for a vote. If we are going to solve the challenges we face, we can't vacillate, we can't shift depending on our politics. You need a president who will pursue genuine solutions day in and day out in a consistent way, and that is my commitment to you.

So Obama says McCain flip flopped on immigration. To that I can only say, "if only!"

Posted by: DrewM at 02:03 PM | Comments (50)
Post contains 782 words, total size 5 kb.

1 No need to apologize.  This is a huge issue, and it's justifyable to be annoyed and afraid of Mccain for this, even if he's obviously 1000000x better than Obama on this and many other issues.

Posted by: ghy at June 28, 2008 02:31 PM (8jYMc)

2

Yet their lives are turned upside down and their families impacted. Should we stop enforcing those laws as well?

Shut the hell up and fall in line. They're running a black man! OooOOooO! Scary!

Posted by: John McCain at June 28, 2008 02:31 PM (hUStE)

3 You can say being here illegally isn’t really that big of a deal  ...

He can say it but it would be a lie. Illegal immigration has turned my city into a dumb. I'm stuck paying high taxes for services to illegal immigrants and seeing service provided to me which I pay for disappear. The infrastructure and the quality of life suck due to illegal immigration.  The flood of cheap labor drives down wages. They flock to one job category to another turning it into another job that Americans won't do, e.g., dry wall, construction. Now they want driver's licenses so they can take over delivery jobs and force wages down for that, too. They don't pay taxes. And the localities have to support them. The feds aren't going to subsidize their housing, pay for their kids school, pay for their medical care, pay for the costs of prosecuting and incarcerating them. 14 billion dollars each year in California alone.

I'm not voting for McCain. Even if I wasn't so hot and bothered about illegal immigration, it would bother me that the man continues to say one thing and then just the opposite a short time later.

Posted by: GRC at June 28, 2008 02:36 PM (HbbDz)

4 In order to actually have any kind of impact, this site might want to consider taking it to the next level. That would include pointing out a link that NALEO has and recognizing that McCain isn't listening to you. This site could come up with grand ideas all day long and it wouldn't make any difference. The only way to have an impact is to publicly discredit McCain by asking him embarassing questions and then uploading his (hopefully lame) responses to Youtube. See my name's link for examples of those who don't know how to ask questions trying to do that, with little success.

Instead of concentrating on grand plans, concentrate on coming up with a good question and a good questioner, and getting them to go to one of his events.

Posted by: Ask about this at June 28, 2008 06:49 PM (OLX6B)

5 "..... attrition will work ......." Hey! McAmnesty! Damned right it will work. It's working in your own damn state ya frekin' moron! FIRST: Secure the borders SECOND: Enforce the laws, particularly IDENTIFY THEFT. Let's do that for your first 4 years and see how many of God's "illegal children" are still hear.

Posted by: GarandFan at June 28, 2008 06:51 PM (eJ32B)

6

McCain could do damn near anything at this point and still get my vote:

Amnesty for illegals? Pshaw!

Calls Cindy the "C" word in public? So?

Kills a family of kittens in front of a vacation Bible school class? Bring it on!

It all comes down to one issue for me now: The Supremes.

Nothing trumps that for me now.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 28, 2008 07:42 PM (b4+xp)

7

Get behind John McCain!l

I know I did.

Posted by: klrtz1 at June 28, 2008 07:53 PM (MrDIe)

8 Get behind John McCain!l

Hard to do when he's already working us from behind.

Posted by: VRWC Agent at June 28, 2008 08:50 PM (Z3AmO)

9 Heh, heh.  jmflynny thinks McCain will appoint conservative justices.  BWA HA HA!  They might be somewhat less liberal that who Obama would appoint, but they'll be liberal enough to vote with the left liberal bloc, making it a moot point.

Posted by: Manji88 at June 28, 2008 09:14 PM (g1MXQ)

10 "Perhaps attrition will work and make the problem more manageable."

Attrition DOES work.  That's why they tried to ram through the Comprehensive Piece of Shit last time, and why they'll try again.  They're afraid.

Posted by: someone at June 28, 2008 09:14 PM (2z2WN)

11 It all comes down to one issue for me now: The Supremes.

How many Supremes can drop dead in four years? TWO! Stevens and Ginsburg. They can be replaced by leftards and it won't make too much difference. Obama can't last more then one term. McCain I don't even trust to nominate conservatives anymore. Too much of that reaching across the aisle crap. And he was the guy who thought Alito was too conservative. Why? Because they already had Roberts? So, again, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could spit.

Posted by: GRC at June 28, 2008 09:15 PM (HbbDz)

12 I keep waiting for the McCain conference call with bloggers where somebody has the balls to ask him the tough questions and not let him weasel out.  The msm is always getting criticized for that, so are conservative bloggers any better.  IOW, are we mice or men?

Posted by: GRC at June 28, 2008 09:18 PM (HbbDz)

13

I can't believe I'm asking this, but what was so wrong with Huckabee?

Oh, I remember, that soft on crime thing.

Was there anything else I'm forgetting?

Posted by: jmflynny at June 28, 2008 09:18 PM (b4+xp)

14 What's that squeaking sound I keep hearing?

Posted by: jmflynny at June 28, 2008 09:19 PM (b4+xp)

15 It all comes down to one issue for me now: The Supremes.

Yes, and? do you think it really matters that much, given that the Dems will have a solid majority in the Senate, and the current leadership (in general) and the current Judicary committe (in particular) will have no, none, nada, zilch reason to confirm an originalist to the high court. At best, we'll see some Kennedy-like justices get thru. At worst, it'll be genetic clones of Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

He might be able to sneak a Roberts thru, but I think the Dems will be on alert for such candidates.

And amnesty for at least 20 million - and maybe as many as 40 million - illegals will seal the deal for the Democrats until they can pack the court with Ruth Bader Ginsberg clones and announce the new People's Democratic Republic of America. They'll just be carrying out the will of the people, you understand.

Yes, yes, I understand, Obama will do the same, just faster. Unfortunately, the choice is one of how fast we come to that end game.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 28, 2008 09:41 PM (1hM1d)

16 Was there anything else I'm forgetting?

There's the whole nanny state thing. That wasn't too cool.  And he's not much different than McCain on immigration or at least he wasn't at one point. He may have 'evolved' on that.

Posted by: DrewM. at June 28, 2008 09:43 PM (hlYel)

17

I want Fred to give me a refund.

I'm going to need that money for therapy.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 28, 2008 09:54 PM (b4+xp)

18 Getting close to voting for Obama vs. McCain.  Thought at first I would just skip the POTUS line but now not so sure.  This moron keeps thumbing me in the eye and I will do the M.A.D. thing.  

Posted by: Hongqi at June 28, 2008 10:12 PM (+WuMm)

19 I was just struck by the observation that the left has decided the War on Terror is a law enforcement issue, but the War on Drugs and the problem with Illegal Immigration is not.

I don't know that observation is at all clarifying -- at this point there is bloody little coming from the left, or John McCain, that needs any more clarification as they seem to be quite committed to their core vanities, and quite willing to throw their law-abiding countrymen under the bus to confirm their warped sense of righteousness.


Posted by: krakatoa at June 28, 2008 10:29 PM (oWDKi)

20
"Children of God"? Oh, for cripes sake.

I am gnashing my teeth. Yes, I am: gnashing.

I agree with several here that McCain can't be trusted to nominate constructionist (i.e., conservative) justices to the Supreme Court. In fact, I don't think he will ... if he gets the chance.

I loathe Obama but I can't stand McCain.

Gnashing ... gnashing ... gnashing ...

Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at June 28, 2008 11:23 PM (NcooJ)

21 The only way to have an impact is to publicly discredit McCain by asking him embarassing questions and then uploading his (hopefully lame) responses to Youtube.

Oh, you mean something like this?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADmuftIjlSE

/sarc

Posted by: cheshirecat at June 29, 2008 01:11 AM (g4bAj)

22 I think it would be better to pressure our reps than McCain on this issue. A whole lot of Democrats are for getting rid of the illegals too, and their reps will be more scared then McCain. Plus they actually vote on the bills.

Posted by: Aaron at June 29, 2008 03:41 AM (Kf1XH)

23

   I keep wondering just what is so difficult to understand about the phrase ILLEGAL immigrants.

   We don't need "comprehensive immigration legislation", the EXISTING laws need to be enforced.

    We have the means to do so, I submit we haven't the WILL.

Posted by: irongrampa at June 29, 2008 04:35 AM (N4pK7)

24 "what was so wrong with Huckabee?"

The fact that he was a pro-amnesty, anti-war, pro-criminal bullshitter who took votes away from actual conservatives?

I hate McCain, but Huckster might actually have me donating to Obamessiah.

Posted by: someone at June 29, 2008 06:22 AM (2z2WN)

25

I'm not voting for McCain. Even if I wasn't so hot and bothered about illegal immigration, it would bother me that the man continues to say one thing and then just the opposite a short time later.

Stupid is as stupid does: PC uncomfortable hypocrisy not to admit that Obama is 100% malleable.

On immigration rhetoric there may not be a huge sound bite differentiation except that Obama is a Marxist and McCain is not a Marxist, so somewhere in the ensuing legislation there WILL be differentiation, particularly in how the Supreme Court will determine. Obama will nominate the likes of John Edwards or Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court. Fred Thompson will vet McCain's SCOTUS nominees to thwart the demise of our Constitution.

So even in the convoluted political world, there is a difference between McCain and Obama, the latter allied with terrorists. And Iran/Israel are beating the war drums for attack within the year particularly sooner with an Obama victory.  NOW let's sense discomfort.

Posted by: maverick muse at June 29, 2008 08:28 AM (1cbR0)

26

"the left has decided the War on Terror is a law enforcement issue, but the War on Drugs and the problem with Illegal Immigration is not."--krakatoa

Good point. Consistency has its virtue. At least it provides predictability or "clarity of vision" of what dope hope believes in.

What a lauding bunch of goons to adorn themselves with the word "audacity" to "change" whatever feels uncomfortable to a Marxist given free reign. All of those pricks with ubertard sensitivities granting more power to the progressives in the name of preserving honor are the truly audacious. "I'm not voting for McCain because [fill in the blank]", that's YOU with the ubertard sensitivity vs. sensability. $.02

Posted by: maverick muse at June 29, 2008 08:40 AM (1cbR0)

27

PC "they are children of God, too"--

WHO ISN'T? Who said anyone wasn't? PC bs. Leave God out of it unless you are running as God's elect, particularly if one's assumption of deity is means to destroy Obama's premise. Steer clear of the bain that brought both the Romney & Huckabee demise. At this point with American multiculturalism overwhelming our melting pot identity, for a candidate to say God this or that only pricks up the ears of voter distrust.

Posted by: maverick muse at June 29, 2008 08:50 AM (1cbR0)

28

McCain has worked very hard to keep some of Bush's conservative judges off the courts, so he has no credibility there.

I'll never vote for him.

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at June 29, 2008 09:32 AM (mPXSS)

29 To echo maverick muse, I'd just like to point out that the butchers of al Qaeda are God's children, too, but we still blow them up every opportunity we get.  In a perfectly Christian sort of way, of course.  Like the sniper in "Saving Private Ryan."

Posted by: lumpenscholar at June 29, 2008 09:38 AM (L5zbV)

30 It all comes down to one issue for me now: The Supremes.

So, naturally, you're voting for the guy who threw a bunch of good conservative judges under the bus for the sake of preserving the Democrats' right to filibuster judges.

I keep waiting for the McCain conference call with bloggers where somebody has the balls to ask him the tough questions and not let him weasel out.

No one who would ask McCain a tough question ever gets invited to one of those conference calls.

Posted by: Socky at June 29, 2008 10:40 AM (/0sRQ)

31

  McCain will nominate conservative Supreme Court Justices?  O really?

  Off the top of your head, who's the best president of the 20th Century?  If you're like most of the Republicans I know, you're more than likely to say "Ronald Reagan".  Reagan was a conservative.  Reagan cared what his fellow conservatives thought about his policies.  Reagan reached out to his fellow conservatives.

  Ronald Reagan placed Kennedy and O'Connor on the Supreme Court.  Do you really think that John McCain will do a better job of nominating Supreme Court justices than Ronald Wilson Reagan did?  Even if you totally ignore the whole "Gang of 14" shenanigans, I think that anyone who says that McCain will be completely trustworthy on this issue should put down their crack pipe and take a step back.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset at June 29, 2008 11:23 AM (BhHL1)

32

So, naturally, you're voting for the guy who threw a bunch of good conservative judges under the bus for the sake of preserving the Democrats' right to filibuster judges.

 

  Socky, you're right, but you understate the problem here.  McCain didn't want to preserve the Left's right to filibuster judges.  His compromise allowed them to squelch the nominations in committee, preventing the need for a filibuster or even a "no" vote against a qualified nominee.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset at June 29, 2008 11:26 AM (BhHL1)

33

I have said repeatedly on this blog that I am no fan of McCain, but I've never said that that fact would lend to a vote for Obama.

It's simply nuts for those who hate McCain's mid-to-left tendencies to then cast a rebellious vote for the far-far-left Obama, a.k.a. Cutting off one's nose to spite his face.

Sometimes, the lesser of the evils is the choice and, whether it's the supremes, or immigration, or drilling for oil, or fill in the blank, what  McCain might do, is a hell of a lot better than the alternative that we know to be a the farthest left agenda that our nation has seen in, well, I don't know when.

This Fall, I will be following my usual routine as the election progresses; working the phones and on election day, working the polling places. Will I be as enthusiastic as I would have been had The Fred hung in there, hell no, but my dread that is Obama compels me to do it.

And, despite what a McCain presidency may bring, I will simply perform a reality check against what might have been, and I will sleep quite comfortably in the belief that a real and true disaster for our nation was narrowly averted.

And, if Obama wins it, I, too, will be gnashing my teeth.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 29, 2008 11:29 AM (Ap1k3)

34 So what's the solution...

The problem is that the pro enforcement people seem to think that their responsibility ends with pulling a lever on election day and complaining on the internet.

I am voting for McCain, because you point out, Obama is worse. I am also going to get off my rear and insist on better.

Posted by: Nobama at June 29, 2008 02:42 PM (viv6a)

35 cheshirecat cutely directs our attention to the video where McCain was asked about calling his wife a c---.

Thankfully, that's not what I meant by my comment above, as my name's link there and in this comment will show. What I mean is pressing McCain on legitimate questions. Until people do that, nothing will change.

Posted by: Ask about this at June 29, 2008 03:50 PM (OLX6B)

36 Hmmmm.

@ jmflynny

"Was there anything else I'm forgetting?"

Ummmm.

Huckabee is a total whack-nut freakazoid!?

Huckabee wanted to modify the fucking US Constitution to match the goddamn Bible!?

Huckabee is as much Marxist leftard as Obama!?

You want me to continue or is this enough for you?

Posted by: memomachine at June 29, 2008 03:56 PM (VFHt1)

37

Memo...It was a rhetorical question.

In the end, there were two choices on the ballot: McCain and Huckabee.

Take your pick.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 29, 2008 05:29 PM (Ap1k3)

38 Hmmmm.

"Take your pick."

Staying home.

Because as long as conservatives are willing to be lead by the nose to the polls, conservatism will continue to die.

As long as the argument "he's kinda better than the other guy" is in play we'll never see another conservative candidate.

The Republican party is about Republicans, not conservatives.  And as long as they can manipulate you, that's how it'll be.

Posted by: memomachine at June 29, 2008 06:42 PM (VFHt1)

39 Hmmmm.

Go ahead and vote for McCain.

And when he fucks you over I'll be right here laughing at you.

Posted by: memomachine at June 29, 2008 06:50 PM (VFHt1)

40

Well, I dunno, Memo.

When I'm standing in the booth a pulling lever, casting a vote at the polls, whether for the candidate of choice or for the better of the bad, I'd damned sure rather be there making that choice on my own than taking the safe route and sitting on my ass on election day, knowing that I could bitch and moan for four years about the choices that other people made.

You want to sit at home on election day, fine, that's your choice. But, don't fucking presume that choices that others make are the result of having been manipulated.

To the contrary, those who sit on their ass and call it a "stand" are going to get exactly what they deserve, the president that somebody else elected for them.

Posted by: jmflynny at June 29, 2008 06:51 PM (Ap1k3)

41 Hmmmm.

@ jmflynny

"You want to sit at home on election day, fine, that's your choice. But, don't fucking presume that choices that others make are the result of having been manipulated."

At least I have principles I'm not willing to give up.

Posted by: memomachine at June 29, 2008 06:57 PM (VFHt1)

42 That's what whoever gets for supporting The Maverick™.  He's a dishonest dick.  Vote for him & get your just rewards.  Me?  I'd rather have four years of Obama, and a real conservative for eight.

Posted by: 5th Level Fighter at June 29, 2008 08:10 PM (c102O)

43 I am voting for McCain, because you point out, Obama is worse. I am also going to get off my rear and insist on better.

Yeah, good luck with that. I'm sure once you send the message that you'll vote for whatever piece of crap the Republican Party puts in front of you... they'll be ever-so-willing to pay attention when you "insist on better."

Posted by: Ronald Wilson Socky at June 30, 2008 10:54 AM (PLvLS)

44 Hmmmm.

Seriously.  Let me get this straight.

McCain has never, to my knowledge, ever voted to confirm a conservative judge and has in fact worked with Democrats to block the confirmation of conservative judges.

And yet he mentions he'll nominate judges like Roberts a couple times and all of a sudden 30+ years of Senate nonsense is wiped clean?

....

Can I interest you in some life insurance?

Don't read the fine print, it's all standard anyways.

Posted by: memomachine at June 30, 2008 12:07 PM (VFHt1)

45

McCain has never, to my knowledge, ever voted to confirm a conservative judge and has in fact worked with Democrats to block the confirmation of conservative judges.

Either your knowledge is limited or there is a vast conspiracy to mislead the public.  Senate.gov says McCain voted yea on both Alito and Roberts, and that was just the first two I checked.  They seem conservative enough.

Posted by: toby timetraveler 928 at July 01, 2008 04:38 AM (evdj2)

46 MTS Converter ist die beste Wahl für Ihnen und kann MTS in AVI, MTS in DVD, MTS in MP4, MPEG, MPG, MOV,MTS in MKV, DivX konvertieren.M2TS ConverterTS ConverterTRP ConverterMOD Converter

Posted by: AVCHD Video Converter at April 13, 2011 12:59 AM (sPTKS)

47 obama address the national association? sounds a very good news. dvd ripper, free dvd ripper for mac, free dvd decrypter.

Posted by: free dvd ripper at May 04, 2011 05:26 AM (RO5Tp)

Posted by: mercedes benz indonesia merdeka at May 05, 2011 10:52 AM (g07Ei)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






96kb generated in 0.0776 seconds; 50 queries returned 179 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.