September 30, 2008
— Ace "Salutory:"
The bail out will take place simply to avoid that depression. But depressions have some salutary effects - the scoundrels go belly up, the weakest get purged. And, in the wake of the disaster, people demand strict regulation of the money lenders to keep their greed in check, and government spends money on the real economy to put people back to work.
Geraghty wonders if the idea that the Democrats are actually engineering this to usher in a new era of socialism is really that far-fetched.
Via Hot Air's Headlines.
Posted by: Ace at
11:07 AM
| Comments (78)
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: CUS at September 30, 2008 11:12 AM (bbXZq)
You know, the tales I have heard from people who lived in places like USSR and such were not happy tales.
Those people were not pro-socialism at all.
Odd that.
Posted by: ArandomPerson at September 30, 2008 11:12 AM (MSMPS)
Posted by: uniball at September 30, 2008 11:12 AM (27iEn)
Ace, have you decided to come back to the conservative side for a bit?
Posted by: Christoph at September 30, 2008 11:12 AM (hawOV)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at September 30, 2008 11:13 AM (W4Uy5)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 30, 2008 11:15 AM (nrD02)
Posted by: OregonMuse at September 30, 2008 11:18 AM (FO+YO)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 30, 2008 11:19 AM (nrD02)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:22 AM (1g+FW)
Posted by: Planet Moron at September 30, 2008 11:23 AM (M0rrv)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 30, 2008 11:24 AM (nrD02)
I think that pain is a necessary side-effect of growth. I think that taking responsibility for our mistakes is an ethical necessity. I do not think that there is any moral value in pointless destruction, nor in self-flagellation. It's actually a kind of repulsive indulgence to wallow in misery this way. Only a fool chooses misery when other options exist.
Posted by: Monty at September 30, 2008 11:25 AM (dCZbI)
BTW, for everyone who thought that we needed to pass the bailout, go read Peter Robinson over at National Review.
We, the opposition of the bailout, are not hayseeds and we know a lot more than you think.
Posted by: Baka Omaeda at September 30, 2008 11:26 AM (Z9IOH)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:27 AM (1g+FW)
Dideretards dog,
You make a valid point, but I highly doubt the Democretarded party is organized enough to engineer what is going on to bring about a new era of socialism through this economic retardation. That's fucking retarded.
But you are right, they do seem even a little more organized than the Retarded party.
Posted by: uniball at September 30, 2008 11:28 AM (27iEn)
No. It isn't. They don't do a thing without calculating partisan and ideological advantage.
Posted by: MlR at September 30, 2008 11:28 AM (PLmsY)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:28 AM (1g+FW)
Read Jonah's Liberal Fascism if you haven't, and you'll get a good primer on how the socialist left works historically. This is all a political ploy to scare the masses into voting for socialism.
And.... why is everyone so pissed about ACORN, but is afraid to mention what that acronym stands for ? Association of COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS for Reform Now. Talk about rabble-rousing. This is where Obama cut his teeth.
Posted by: JB at September 30, 2008 11:30 AM (JC9Hy)
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 11:31 AM (b1ysY)
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at September 30, 2008 11:31 AM (AHrTm)
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at September 30, 2008 11:33 AM (MMC8r)
http://tinyurl.com/46hlds
And inside I found some disturbing facts:
-- Banks are no longer making subprime loans
-- Banks are demanding a higher interest rate for jumbo loans
-- People with lower incomes are getting fewer credit card solicitations
-- It now takes average or better credit scores to get the lowest rates on auto loans
-- CD yields, which represent banks moving towards more cash deposits, are rising
OMG. We're all going to die. I mean, we HAVE to approve this bailout so that banks can make more subprime and cheap jumbo loans, so that people with lower incomes can get more credit cards and cars, and so people will stop putting their money into banks and start spending it instead.
/sarc
Ever get the idea that the Democrats use the poor as a blunt instrument? Why are the Democrats always suing and demanding that companies extend poor people credit, then turning right around and demanding that those same companies be punished for "predatory tactics"?
Again, what McCain needs to do here is say flat-out, "Obama supports taxpayer dollars being used to support those who took out mortgages they couldn't afford and those who were greedy enough to give them those mortgages. I don't. Let's talk about something that helps those businesses and companies who these actions hurt first, and put those who caused the damage at the back of the line."
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at September 30, 2008 11:33 AM (E3Yxq)
I think it's the retribution thing that appeals to them, Anybody with any money--George Soros excepted--did something awful to get that money and ought to be brought low. Maybe they aren't cheering for it but they might see a very large silver lining.
Posted by: spongeworthy at September 30, 2008 11:34 AM (a00go)
I bet you over half the people using the acronym picked it up on the blogs and didn't know what it stood for.
Posted by: Christoph at September 30, 2008 11:35 AM (hawOV)
Posted by: uniball at September 30, 2008 11:35 AM (27iEn)
They're afraid of the wrath of David Gergen.
"These Democrats are trying to unite the country around something the people do not support and the Republicans are playing party politics by listening to the people. - David Gergen
Change his batteries. - Anderson Cooper"
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at September 30, 2008 11:35 AM (AHrTm)
Posted by: uniball at September 30, 2008 11:38 AM (27iEn)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:38 AM (1g+FW)
Posted by: Liberal Zombies after the collapse at September 30, 2008 11:39 AM (evdj2)
Except Adam Smith, who many people credit with the idea of Laissez Faire capitalism used that line first.
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be anything very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 11:39 AM (lNQg8)
The American public sniffed out this scam. Gargantuan financial interests manufactured this crisis in order to shake down the American taxpayer. Busted. Ace got jobbed.
Pelosi brought that bill to the floor only because she thought it would pass. My hunch is that Boehner told her he had 90-100 votes for it. She dealt out the "Get out of Vote Free" cards to her cronies. He lied. Beautifully.
Posted by: Molon Labe at September 30, 2008 11:40 AM (kYpqT)
Another day of polls...a further widening of the gap between Obama and McCain. Meth time from McCranky.
Another log from Diderots Dog.
Watch where you step.
Posted by: kidney at September 30, 2008 11:42 AM (/RDxc)
If ACORN uses the "livable wage" as a pillar of their platform for change, but goes to court to sue employees asking for ACORN to pay minimum wage, what's the angle if ACORN has placed bailing out people that should never have been approved for loans in the first place as one of their new pillars?
The founders of ACORN just admitted to extorting the organization for their own benefit, right?
I will summarily submit their names for Chairman of the new regulatory board that oversees whatever the hell bill Washington passes.
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at September 30, 2008 11:42 AM (AHrTm)
Sorry I am posting from work and accidentally posted that while on the phone. I have no forgotten what I was going to say to complete the thought.
I assureyou it was profound but after 10 minutes talking to a marketing guy profound is no longer within my grasp.
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 11:43 AM (lNQg8)
Posted by: Gabriel Sutherland at September 30, 2008 11:43 AM (AHrTm)
"Geraghty wonders if the idea that the Democrats are actually engineering this to usher in a new era of socialism is really that far-fetched."
No way. It's never happened before, I know that radical leftist assholes would never even think of doing this.
It's not like they are taught this from birth or anyhing like that, or brainwashed into believing this shit.
Amazing, I mean, really, how could tihs happen so close to an election, just a fucking coincidence.
I know they have something on that Paulson fuck, maybe some bathroom stall hijinks...
Posted by: Sen. Rev. Dr. E Buzz at September 30, 2008 11:47 AM (sf4Oe)
I got a better idea, why doesn't ace ban DD for being a retarded dickhole?
Posted by: OregonMuse at September 30, 2008 11:47 AM (FO+YO)
After not hearing a peep from the so-called GOP leadership condemning Frank, Dodd et al (screw their comity and professional courtesy --haven't they had Frank flick boogers in their face?) I've concluded they are all hung like stud field mice.
I see the death of the GOP in all of this. Why the hell would anyone with a lick of integrity, common sense and conservatism want to be associated with the Assclown Party?
Posted by: effinayright at September 30, 2008 11:49 AM (fH1BE)
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 11:49 AM (b1ysY)
And inside I found some disturbing facts:
-- Banks are no longer making subprime loans
-- Banks are demanding a higher interest rate for jumbo loans
true and congratulations on making progress. yesterday you opposed the bailout while banks were still making zero down no income verification loans to people with bad credit. i suppose you think those type of loans will make a quick reappearance when the bailout is approved. i don't think they will come back soon.
Posted by: PR at September 30, 2008 11:49 AM (k7SeR)
Hey, Ace, how about banning DD for coming into threads and spam-trolling for shit that has nothing to do with the thread at hand?
But first let's give him the Most Improved Troll award since he is using punctuation now.
Posted by: Maetenloch at September 30, 2008 11:49 AM (hn7Rm)
I'm fine with that, too. Since my local prosecutor became an Ubersturmfuhrer on the Obama Ministry of Truth Squad, I'm not as wedded to the idea of 'fair play' with these cocksuckers as I once was.
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at September 30, 2008 11:53 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Fritz at September 30, 2008 11:56 AM (UU4Hu)
WTF?!? Government doesn't put money into the "real economy", and the only people that they hire are bureaucrats. Government TAKES MONEY OUT OF the real economy, and stifles putting people to work by encouraging people to live on welfare and food stamps.
Posted by: Smokey Behr at September 30, 2008 12:04 PM (QyeW7)
John Milton had the leftist mentality down pat in "Paradise Lost":
"Better to reign in hell than serve in Heaven"
Posted by: effinayright at September 30, 2008 12:04 PM (fH1BE)
Posted by: Andy at September 30, 2008 12:11 PM (C3mTI)
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 12:15 PM (b1ysY)
Yup -- especially when Obama, Frank, and others start screaming "affordable housing" and sending out their ACORN goons.
http://tinyurl.com/3pdmzo
Repeal the CRA, then we talk.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at September 30, 2008 12:17 PM (E3Yxq)
Posted by: Darth Daver at September 30, 2008 12:18 PM (AfLHm)
And now, thanks to Vic, I have a new item for my list of demands; the Republicans state publicly that Nancy Pelosi is attempting to block any attempt to investigate Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae executives for their role in encouraging and demanding subprime mortgages.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at September 30, 2008 12:20 PM (E3Yxq)
The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.
Vladimir Lenin
The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.
Vladimir Lenin
The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.
Vladimir Lenin
A revolution is impossible without a revolutionary situation; furthermore, not every revolutionary situation leads to revolution.
Vladimir Lenin
I think they're organized and they're following the basic socialist playbook.
Posted by: Speller at September 30, 2008 12:22 PM (AzWCU)
Posted by: Wally Balls at September 30, 2008 12:22 PM (wkp0J)
suppose you think those type of loans will make a quick reappearance when the bailout is approved. i don't think they will come back soon
As I posted in the other thread, those kind of loans can NOT go away because the law forces them to be made.
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 12:32 PM (b1ysY)
Wally
The constant refrain made by the Astroturfing Sockpuppets for the Vomit over at Townhall.com is deregulation and Wall Street CEO greed. When asked specifics for deregulation their repsonse is removal of Glass-Steagle. When asked how that caused or effected the event there is usually no comment.
Perhaps DD has an explanation.
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 12:35 PM (b1ysY)
LOL, now it wouldnt do any good to repeal CRA. Pelosi sponsored and rammed through this bill which was signed into law on July 30th.
We now have another permanent socialist housing authority.
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 12:42 PM (b1ysY)
Again, America; Obama believes that you should be forced to pay for other peoples' choice to take out subprime mortgages that they can't afford and the bankers who were foolish enough to give said mortgages to them.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at September 30, 2008 12:46 PM (E3Yxq)
Posted by: the real joe at September 30, 2008 12:55 PM (TOly9)
Posted by: Barack Obama at September 30, 2008 12:57 PM (tcMQZ)
Just because the last election swung the country left doesn't mean the next won't go as far in the opposite direction.
Posted by: Darren at September 30, 2008 01:11 PM (NYvO8)
Geraghty wonders if the idea that the Democrats are actually engineering this to usher in a new era of socialism is really that far-fetched.
My dad, who was alive at the time although very young, swears that Cactus Jack Garner as speaker of the house did exactly that from '29 to '32. He blocked every move that Hoover tried to make in order to right the economy so that Hoover would be discredited and the Dems could take the White House in '32. Mr. Garner, being from a southern state and it being only two generations since the reconstruction, was unelectable and so the country got an east coast aristocrat named FDR. History was rewritten to show Hoover as a later day Nero who didn't care about the little man and basically fiddled while the country burned. So I wouldn't say that Geraghty's musings don't have a chance to be valid.
Posted by: pendejo grande at September 30, 2008 01:18 PM (L47wF)
Posted by: shibumi at September 30, 2008 01:23 PM (tZB/c)
A few years ago I was in Benton Harbor, MI on business. Several of us went out to a bar in town after our daily activities and I noted that most of the downtown stores were boarded up and it looked like one of those old WWII photographs of European towns at the end of the war.
I asked a local about it and he said that the economy had been largely based on auto part suppliers who had ALL moved out to foreign lands where the taxes, unions, and regulations were more amenable to operate.
Yeah, you could call it a minor depression.
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 01:44 PM (b1ysY)
Posted by: Lemmiwinks at September 30, 2008 01:55 PM (5GNS+)
You know, I never expected in my life that there would come a time when Pravda was more accurate than the New York Times.
http://tinyurl.com/4kc7we
Posted by: Vic at September 30, 2008 02:24 PM (b1ysY)
@30:
Who quoted Adam Smith:
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it.....
That was certainly true when Smith wrote.
But it is manifestly not true in America today, where the poor are obese, the rich strive to be "social x-rays", and even welfare recipients own cars, plasma TVs, A/C/and PCs..
A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be anything very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion."
So the conclusion Smith reached ---about "the rich" having an obligation to pay more in taxes for house-rents and that "this sort of inequality not...be[ing] very unreasonable --- is today a non sequitur.
If you want to make an argument that "the rich", which apparently includes all taxpayers, have an obligation to buy homes for "the poor" , well, you would sound just like Barney Frank and Maxine Waters, wouldn't you.
But you wouldn't sound like Adam Smith.
Posted by: effinayright at September 30, 2008 02:36 PM (fH1BE)
you are probably used to the taste of nuts in your mouth.
So, roll up in a ball in the corner and spend some quality time slobberwashing your
own junk. Slobber could damage your keyboard, so stay away from that.
Happy lickin', Dog...
Posted by: the burgermeister meisterburger at September 30, 2008 03:13 PM (rpyl2)
Posted by: the burgermeister meisterburger at September 30, 2008 03:15 PM (rpyl2)
Posted by: Shark at September 30, 2008 03:26 PM (2jGlR)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at September 30, 2008 04:02 PM (75nxw)
With that crowd in charge, what depression?
After all, they're allied with the Kennedys, what could go wrong?
Posted by: the burgermeister meisterburger at September 30, 2008 04:11 PM (rpyl2)
Take away guns, melt them down for scrap money and give the money to the homeless for crack and Thunderbird.
Instant economic stimulus.
Stunning, almost Messianic grasp of the issues scrolling across the teleprompter.
Let's all stand and bow in the direction of Chicago in obeisance to the Coming Lord of (Menthol) Kools and the leftie lay-up.
Posted by: the burgermeister meisterburger at September 30, 2008 04:18 PM (rpyl2)
I posted that and as I explained in point 34 I got interrupted and hit post before I was finished. The point I was going to make though was that playing Sean Hannity and breaking out the from each to each line in response to every economic argument as prooff of socialism doesn't really work given that the idea is also exhibited in Wealth of nations.
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 04:44 PM (YICPL)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at September 30, 2008 05:50 PM (8t/JR)
Posted by: davy jones locker at September 30, 2008 08:35 PM (iot9F)
Posted by: Kevin at September 30, 2008 08:58 PM (KO6dP)
Posted by: onehj at December 07, 2008 10:17 PM (nWyuK)
Posted by: baigno at December 11, 2010 08:39 PM (CXcwz)
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 07, 2011 10:20 PM (JsxNx)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









