June 30, 2008
— Ace Sector outlook: "Grim."
Instapundit says he doesn't have much "glee" about this. I have a lot more. It's true that news is important.
On the other hand, those who have been delivering the news to us have been doing a rotten -- and deliberately so -- job. People don't trust them; they recognize they are by and large an owned-and-operated subsidiary of the DNC's communications department.
It's a good thing when bad businesses die. It clears the way for good businesses to enter the field.
Posted by: Ace at
01:53 PM
| Comments (57)
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jaded at June 30, 2008 02:03 PM (6RfTN)
Posted by: unclezeb at June 30, 2008 02:04 PM (/DoLk)
I think we do need newspapers; but it will take a long time before we get them back. I hope one day to be able to subscribe to a good one, and also one that doesn't have crappy comics, too.
Posted by: RiverC at June 30, 2008 02:09 PM (UazOs)
Posted by: jdun at June 30, 2008 02:12 PM (iZtK6)
Posted by: GarandFan at June 30, 2008 02:32 PM (eJ32B)
Posted by: vanderleun at June 30, 2008 03:23 PM (s0k8A)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at June 30, 2008 05:29 PM (wVl3j)
Posted by: LiveFreeOrDie at June 30, 2008 05:47 PM (wVl3j)
Posted by: runninrebel at June 30, 2008 06:02 PM (0n9wc)
Posted by: exdem13 at June 30, 2008 06:16 PM (fenBi)
Posted by: Frank G at June 30, 2008 06:21 PM (P0rQD)
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at June 30, 2008 06:22 PM (AZwSr)
Posted by: MSM at June 30, 2008 06:27 PM (ltwze)
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at June 30, 2008 06:31 PM (NWFxC)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at June 30, 2008 06:37 PM (W9lfm)
Posted by: joe at June 30, 2008 06:38 PM (YcIuv)
I do that, as well. But some offers are available in print, and the few bucks a week for the Post-Disgrace I can easily get back on groceries each week. Plus I get the store circulars.
That said, most days the rest of the paper goes right in the recycling bin.
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at June 30, 2008 06:45 PM (NWFxC)
Posted by: Davey at June 30, 2008 06:49 PM (yfL6L)
Women's Topless Beach Soccer
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 30, 2008 07:05 PM (Ds4I5)
What a POS. After the Steyn debacle, the rag lost all value (except maybe 80% of the cartoons...)
Posted by: apb at June 30, 2008 07:06 PM (GMTYT)
Posted by: Ted K. at June 30, 2008 07:26 PM (Zvr96)
Good, good and good.
No more editorials masquerading as "front page news items"
No more intentional downplaying of good economic news
No more subtle glorifying of the enemy
No more propaganda
Posted by: TMF at June 30, 2008 07:28 PM (/YM8H)
All most of the papers need is a guy who can cut and paste the DNC talking points into a daily layout. You wouldn't think their expenses would be that great.
So true. A lot of papers are little more than an AP feed + phone-it-in editorials + sports scores + ads. A web page could do all of this better and cheaper.
Posted by: Maetenloch at June 30, 2008 07:33 PM (hn7Rm)
Your subscription never actually paid the cost of producing the paper. They were lucky to cover printing costs. The rest of the paper was really there to support the ads, and especially the real moneymaker: classified ads. What's putting these people out of business is craigslist.
It may be the industry gets reborn in a form more palatable to conservatives, but I don't see how they can make the money end work. How will they get people to pay for news collection when you can't copyright the news?
In the end I'll bet the only thing that survives in physical form are those free "neighborhood" papers with the gay personals and ads for escort services ("get a personal massage in your own home!") .
Posted by: Ace's liver at June 30, 2008 07:53 PM (XIXhw)
I'd hope the weakness of the newpaper business is due to ideological bias, but frankly I'd doubt that's any more than a minor factor in their downfall - it's a contributing factor, but not the whole story.
Inaccurate and imcomplete reporting on the other hand may be a bigger factor.
Newspapers are in a serious cost squeeze - paper, ink, labor, energy and delivery costs are escalating, meanwhile advertising revenue is dropping because the "new media" are gradually taking more and more of the advertising bucks.
I think a major reason there's a decline is that fewer people have a lifestyle in which newspapers are usable and relevant. The number of people who have 30 to 60 minutes to read a newspaper is rapidly declining.
They also cannot deliver news quickly like the internet - they have no means to be able to customize content for a specific person.
We are in a time of both lifestyle and technology changes , which the standard print media will struggle against as an old technology.
Newspapers are only the first to go. Magazines and books will follow.
Posted by: Dr Bob at June 30, 2008 08:38 PM (EZTZx)
It committed suicide a while ago. Well, at least it tried, but it bungled that too. Now its just a vegetable on life support waiting for someone to pull the plug.
Its just a matter of time....
Posted by: MLKJrJrHS at June 30, 2008 08:47 PM (RLBRw)
It simply isn't worth the five dollars for the Sunday edition of the NYTs (or whatever) for the content they provide. The original reporting is thin and frankly not usual or desirable to a vast cross section of the population. I wouldn't think about subscribing to the NYTs; with the bias it would be as perverse as subscribing to, say, Vogue.
The NYTs is shrinking to the level of demand for that type of 'news', so they attract that much advertising revenue, and that's why it costs so much per paper, and that's why so many people are leaving.
Ideology has costs, too. Nothing is immune from economics.
Posted by: Vercingetorix at June 30, 2008 09:07 PM (V/FgT)
From a speech Michael Chrichton gave in 1993:
"The media has treated information the way John D. Rockefeller treated oil - as a commodity, in which the distribution network, rather than product quality, is of primary importance. But once people can get the raw data themselves, that monopoly ends. And that means big changes, soon."
Posted by: maxman at June 30, 2008 09:29 PM (OYeDg)
Ace, you should consider writing a column or two and submitting it for publication on other sites, like Townhall or the National Review or whatever. You're the conservative blogger of the year. Ya know?
Posted by: Dogstar at June 30, 2008 10:16 PM (FgxdU)
They assured me that a correction would run. It never did.
I hope that paper goes bankrupt.
Posted by: Daryl Herbert at June 30, 2008 10:47 PM (YvLui)
Verily, but the Schadenfreude tastes just as sweet. The fact that the average newspaper hack won't be handsomely paid for acting as a self-righteous gatekeeper of current events is sweet music, music that sounds like thousands of egos being ground to bits.
Posted by: adamthemad at June 30, 2008 10:51 PM (FBhoV)
It would be a shame to lose newspapers. If someone wants to take on a mob-type group or a very corrupt politician/public figure the newspaper gives them the support and protection to do it. It is also nice to have a paper to read.
If the paper has the reputation of telling people what happened rather than what the people who edit the paper want people to think happened they should be able to stay in business. It does not really matter what the editors think belongs on the front page if pages 2-24 are solid. People, including me, are too picky about the MSM and do not pay enough attention to people who do their jobs well.
Posted by: bleh at June 30, 2008 11:41 PM (GNCy6)
Let's hope that as the "bad businesses" die off, new entrants emerge to replace them. Just now, the prospects are unfavorable to printed-news outlets, for a host of reasons.
Possibly the change that would make the greatest difference would be the cultivation of traditional journalism staffs by the online presences. We have a few already -- AP, UPI, AFP -- but they're part of the problem rather than a solution to it. New investigative staffs that practice objective on-the-scene journalism and reportage would be a great improvement on the current state of affairs for many reasons. If their offerings were attractively priced, they could fertilize all sorts of news organs.
Many people do prefer to read printed news media. It would be a shame were they to die out altogether.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at July 01, 2008 12:36 AM (GY/ii)
Posted by: VRWC Agent at July 01, 2008 04:17 AM (Z3AmO)
They recently announced massive layoffs which made me very happy.
Bottom line is the 1st amendment doesn't guarantee them a revenue stream or audience. If they piss people off, they're going to lose customers. The sooner they realize that my business isn't an entitlement, the better off they'll be.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 01, 2008 07:55 AM (dcqty)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 01, 2008 07:57 AM (dcqty)
Posted by: Captain Hate at July 01, 2008 08:12 AM (6FjBP)
All of the above are contributing factors to the demise of newspapers but what this is also signifying is the end of the baby boomer era.
Any business that depended on the behavior of the baby boomers is going to feel the sting...it's just cause and effect.
Posted by: D4v3Y at July 01, 2008 09:42 AM (g0XUL)
Posted by: apb at June 30, 2008 07:06 PM (GMTYT)
I miss the comics too. 80% of yours were worth reading? Lucky. Less than half the last time we got a paper.
A newspaper has worth only as something to put under pumpkins when carving them. That's it. Luckily, the weekly community paper is free and we just need to keep a couple of them for that.
Posted by: TomJW at July 01, 2008 10:13 AM (xRCpL)
I don’t think newspapers are dying so much for the left/liberal bias, as they die for PRETENDING that they don’t have a left/liberal bias.
Obviously, the growth of internet news and other news sources means that newspapers are consolidating. Few cities have more than one substantial newspaper anymore. But this is also because people are sick and tired of "newspapers" that pretend objectivity, but have none.
I think American newspapers will have to follow the British model: admit they have a point of view, and defend it. It is understood in the UK that the Telegraph is independent-rightist, the Times (London) A Tory house organ, the Guardian a Labour house organ, and the Daily Mirror is independent-left (borderline tabloid, that one, but let’s not quibble). And in that country, people often subscribe to two or more newspapers and compare and contrast.
Let’s just look at cable news. Isn’t it given that CNN is more left/liberal, save for a few mavericks like Glenn Beck, and Fox News is more right/conservative, save for a few like Geraldo or Colmes?
Wouldn’t it be refreshing if, say the San Diego Union Tribune or the Orange County Register openly chose to be the right/republican house organ for SoCal, and the LA Times conceeded openly that it was the left/democrat party house organ? People could actually buy BOTH newspapers and compare and contrast.
Meanwhile, in NorCal, it is no surprise that the McClatchy papers (The Bees) acquired the Knight-Ridder papers (Mercury News), and that circulation for both papers declines. How many left/liberal papers can an area with less population than Los Angeles support?
You know, if the ghost of Mr. Hearst could speak, he would be telling the dolts who run the Chronicle to take a hard right tack. Admittedly this would be hard to do in San Fransicko, but with the Bee and Mercury News basically echoing the same point of view, the left/liberal point of view is basically tapped out in the North.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 01, 2008 01:47 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Outlet at September 18, 2009 02:05 AM (IPPI5)
Posted by: iolanda at September 30, 2009 01:44 AM (YgE7Y)
Thank you..
Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacılık Brnckvvtmllttrhaberi
Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacılık Brnckvvtmllttrhaberi
Posted by: Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacı at February 13, 2010 05:18 PM (G0i8M)
Posted by: dghdtrg at June 11, 2010 08:24 PM (ybumh)
Posted by: dghdtrg at June 11, 2010 08:24 PM (ybumh)
Posted by: great at October 26, 2010 10:04 PM (k1KlJ)
Posted by: balance at November 19, 2010 07:45 PM (TdD91)
PDF to BMP Converter is a windows application to convert pdf to bmp format. With pdf to bitmap software, single or batch processing are allowed and if converting the multiple pages pdf file, one page for one bmp picture.
Posted by: xuefei at May 17, 2011 04:36 AM (p1iCY)
Posted by: adam at June 15, 2011 11:19 AM (i0QPT)
Posted by: เที่ยวสิงคโปร์ at August 09, 2011 12:43 AM (Bj3yA)
Posted by: Jeans Online Outlet at August 09, 2011 02:15 AM (zbnHW)
Posted by: งานสิงคโปร์ at October 28, 2011 02:28 AM (ZfYxX)
Thank you for all of your hard work on this web site. Debby really likes setting aside time for research and it is simple to grasp why. We notice all relating to the dynamic manner you deliver helpful ideas on this blog and therefore cause participation from some others about this area while our own princess is now discovering a whole lot. My Blog เที่ยวสิงคโปร์ foods high in fiber list อุปกรณ์คอมพิวเตอร์
Posted by: อุปกรณ์คอมพิวเตอร์ at January 24, 2012 05:00 AM (Gvw//)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









