June 23, 2008
— Ace SurveyUSA puts support for expanded offshore drilling at 59%, even among our goofiest minority, Californian-Americans.
Posted by: Ace at
06:52 PM
| Comments (70)
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
They might as well. I lived in Santa Monica for 4 years, up until just last year when I left. The coastal ocean there is so polluted already I can't imagine why they wouldn't go ahead and drill. It might even lower the price of gas a bit while yer waiting in rush hour traffic on the 405 inhaling the smog.
Posted by: electricferret at June 23, 2008 07:05 PM (9zMOM)
Posted by: Log Cabin at June 23, 2008 07:15 PM (j7zrD)
Did they understand the questions?
Silly me, of course not. But how did they misunderstand the question this badly?
Ok, still silly. But they usually get the concept of "oil is bad" across pretty clearly, if surrounded by incoherent drivel.
I mean even the exported Californians here in Colorado have gotten Senator Salazar to ban (nationwide, not just here) Oil Shale development... how could they go that wrong back home.
Unless they're exporting the stupidest ones here. Damn, they're craftier than I thought...
Posted by: Gekkobear at June 23, 2008 07:33 PM (xploK)
Posted by: Uncle Jefe at June 23, 2008 07:34 PM (p8IOE)
I know it's hard to imagine about some Californians. But, here in Kern County we bitterly cling to our Oil, Gas, and CCW's. Well that and growing food, and being good stewards of the environment.
Posted by: Allen at June 23, 2008 07:36 PM (Zo7G6)
Posted by: right at June 23, 2008 07:37 PM (EquV1)
Posted by: km at June 23, 2008 07:51 PM (yJvi8)
Posted by: Ostral-B Heretic at June 23, 2008 07:53 PM (9u8Jf)
A couple of points. First, everyone remembers the horrible ecological catastrophe that was the Santa Barbara oil spill of 1969. Fact is, though, there's a town just a bit south of there called Carpinteria....note the second paragraph in the Wikipedia entry....it was called Carpinteria by the Spanish when they showed up because of the use of natural oil seepage in the area.
And I remember driving up the coast from Ventura to SB along highway 101. The oil rigs were like tiny Christmas trees out in the water. I thought they looked quite festive, actually. I had heard about people going out on dive trips to the platforms and describing amazing oases of life around the modernistic sculpture of the platform's piers.
By the time I got SCUBA certified, many of the platforms were gone. I've never been able to dive one. And the lights out on the water are gone, too. And I'm paying four-and-a-half-freakin'-dollars for gas when I live in an oil-producing state. I blame it on the tree-hugging anti-human Hobbesian morons who keep trying to revert society back to the Neanderthal despite having no worthwhile skills in that context.
For myself, I'd love to see California's beauty enjoyed; her resources utilized; her fertility productive; and her uniqueness preserved. I don't see old-growth redwood giants or Bristlecone Pines logged for lumber, but I don't understand preservationists getting into a huff about timber younger than their grandfather. I would expect all due care near the elephant seal rookery at Ano Nuevo, but I would support responsible drilling all along the California coast.
Posted by: cthulhu at June 23, 2008 07:57 PM (AShNd)
Posted by: torabora at June 23, 2008 08:21 PM (15g6y)
I live in the Monetey Peninsula area some folks refer to L.A. as Smell-A.
Posted by: Yikes! at June 23, 2008 08:22 PM (R9ZWr)
"Aerial, surface, and underwater investigations reveal that natural seeps off Coal Oil Point, California, introduce about 50 to 70 barrels (approximately 8,000 to 11,000 liters) of oil per day into the Santa Barbara Channel. The resulting slicks are several hundred meters wide and are of the order of 10-5 centimeters thick; tarry masses within these slicks frequently wash ashore."
And that is just at Coal Oil Point. Beach erosion is currently exposing natural seeps on the shoreline and storms bring tarballs from far offshore onto the beach as far North as Half Moon Bay near San Francisco.
I just got a poll in the mail from my Congressman. I told him to drill.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 23, 2008 08:41 PM (/XgUc)
Posted by: crosspatch at June 23, 2008 08:46 PM (/XgUc)
"Assuming the seep scales are proportional to the surface area, a reasonable seep rate for the entire Gulf is about double the northern Gulf estimate, giving a total Gulf of Mexico seep rate of about 140,000 tonnes per year (ranging from 80,000 to 200,000 tonnes per year)."
Also, more on Coal Oil Point:
"They concluded that Coal Oil Point seeps about 7,800 to 8,900 tonnes of oil per year. To account for seeps likely to be present elsewhere in the Santa Barbara Channel and the offshore Santa Maria and Santa Monica Basins, the total oil seepage offshore southern California is now estimated to be about twice the seepage at Coal Oil Point, or about 17,000 tonnes annually, rounded to one significant figure of 20,000 tonnes of oil per year. This estimate is large but is still less than the upper estimate of Fischer (197
For North America:
"Tables 2-5 through 2-9 summarize the estimates of the yearly amounts of oil seepage occurring offshore from North America. The total seepage is 160,000 tonnes per year."
For global seepage:
"the annual global oil seepage rate is now estimated to be between 200,000 and 2,000,000 tonnes (60 and 600 million gallons). The best estimate of 600,000 tonnes (180 million gallons), within this range, comes from the acceptance of the original estimates of Wilson et al. (1973, 1974), resulting from a new appreciation for the magnitude of the natural seepage of crude oil, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico."
Total amount of man made spillage? For the decade 1990 to 1999 the total known global spillage is 556.2 tons. Yup, that's all ... under 600 tons. The entire man made oil spillage for the entire decade of the 1990's is just about equal to one month's natural seepage in Southern California.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 23, 2008 08:55 PM (/XgUc)
Posted by: crosspatch at June 23, 2008 09:02 PM (/XgUc)
Posted by: Harun at June 23, 2008 09:03 PM (tiHPL)
"When my mom was a kid (in the 1920's) she used to spend summers in Santa Barbara with her uncle and aunt. She said the beaches were covered with oil. Once they started drilling for oil off Santa Barbara, the beaches cleaned up."
Posted by: crosspatch at June 23, 2008 10:38 PM (/XgUc)
59% of them approve of that. The other 20% don't own a boat.
Posted by: JayC at June 23, 2008 11:10 PM (I8/F3)
Crosspatch, I was thinking the same thing. Where I grew up in Thousand Oaks, tot he extent that I ever grew up, there were seepage points all along the hiking trails that followed the Conejo Creek. I noted more of the same in parkland near the Santa Clarita area where I now live. One was so active we were making 'Beverly Hillbillies' jokes.
Can;t we get rid of this nasty stuff and make some money along the way?
Posted by: epobirs at June 23, 2008 11:23 PM (d8xkq)
Careful what you wish for. The environmental nutjobs will learn that lesson well.
They wanted high gas to cut CO2, turn America into cave dwellers. Now they got the high gas and it looks like their entire movement of 30 years is ready to fall apart.
the environmental wackjobs need to learn that people only care about the environment when they are wealthy and have extra money.
when you are poor the environment comes in a distant 5th on the ladder. Food, housing, energy, defense, entertainment all come before the "environment"
Posted by: unseen at June 23, 2008 11:34 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: Al at June 23, 2008 11:40 PM (Lk931)
Posted by: Jones at June 24, 2008 12:59 AM (XNzgD)
We lived in California for 2 years in the early '70's and I never thought of this until now. We used to go to the beaches between Half Moon Bay and Santa Cruz. We were always picking tar off of ourselves (it was all over our feet) for days. It has never been like that on any Gulf beach I've been on. What, no oil in the Gulf of Mexico? Those idiot environmentalists have been blaming CA beach tar on platforms?
Oh yeah, turns out the "lost tribe" found recently in the Amazon wasn't so lost after all. Turns out they've been known about since 1910 and it was all a hoax to stop logging by...enviromentalists. These people have to be stopped.
Posted by: mikey at June 24, 2008 01:25 AM (blNMI)
Posted by: hippy slut at June 24, 2008 02:02 AM (FBhoV)
Posted by: TMF at June 24, 2008 03:11 AM (KTgUG)
Posted by: TMF at June 24, 2008 03:12 AM (KTgUG)
Posted by: AndrewsDad at June 24, 2008 04:03 AM (Y5X50)
Posted by: XBradTC at June 24, 2008 04:21 AM (kddTy)
Posted by: DocJ at June 24, 2008 04:35 AM (3Nxw7)
Posted by: william at June 24, 2008 04:52 AM (Pgwuz)
Posted by: GarandFan at June 24, 2008 04:57 AM (eJ32B)
Posted by: The Other Shoe at June 24, 2008 05:34 AM (Pus2I)
Posted by: Michael K at June 24, 2008 05:37 AM (H6VxR)
Posted by: Entropy at June 24, 2008 05:46 AM (m6c4H)
It's well over due. The environmentalists are out of control. All they do is obstruct without any reason but that they can. They need a real beat down.
Posted by: GRC at June 24, 2008 05:57 AM (m1/ud)
Come and listen to a story about a man named Tool
A poor struggling actor, barely kept his tank full,
Then one day he was shopping for some food,
And up through the ground came a seeping crude.
Oil that is, black gold, other state's tea.
Well the first thing you know ol' Tools brain isn't just air,
Kinfolk said Tool we must drill away there
Said Californy is the place we ought to look
So they loaded up the trucks and moved to Beverly.
Hills, that is.Oil pools, moving tars.
The Beverly Hypocrits!
Posted by: eh at June 24, 2008 06:01 AM (m2CN7)
Obama spokesman Bill Burton on October 24, 2007: To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.
Barack Obama, June 20, 2008: Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.
All Barack Obama statements come with an expiration date. All of them.
Geraghty, NRO today
If you believe in this asshole, you are unequivocally, an asshole
Posted by: TMF at June 24, 2008 06:02 AM (KTgUG)
Posted by: Ash McGonigal at June 24, 2008 06:02 AM (5n92a)
Kinda puts a new face on the saying, "A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged."
The updated version might be, "A consevative is a liberal who has been to the gas station."
Posted by: captkidney at June 24, 2008 06:13 AM (Bq8Sp)
How's that "liberals don't like drilling" strawman working for you?
I don't see a strawman. Because I still don't see wells.
Posted by: CJ at June 24, 2008 06:13 AM (9KqcB)
Posted by: RiteWingFascist at June 24, 2008 06:31 AM (wmQOP)
Posted by: davod at June 24, 2008 06:32 AM (llh3A)
Posted by: MAJHAM at June 24, 2008 06:33 AM (NMK3S)
I don't know when you lived here in California, but it hasn't been like that for a long time. Back in the 70s there was a smog problem, but that is all but gone now. The reason the air isn't crystal clear is because of a marine layer that usually covers the LA basin.
And as far as pollution in the water, again, I don't know what you mean by that. Its not like Hawaii where the water is crystal clear -- but that is because of the region, not the pollution. More algae, more sand that gets kicked up, etc.
People always say crap like this about LA because its the "conventional wisdom" of those who don't live here.
Posted by: dan-O at June 24, 2008 06:43 AM (7Nejo)
As a native Californian I give my permission.
As a current resident of Utah I give my permission to pursue all that shale we have in the eastern part of the state.
so what are you waiting for?
Posted by: uniball at June 24, 2008 06:49 AM (27iEn)
They do for the biggest ones. Since the oil companies are not allowed to drill, they put these inverted cones on the sea bed over the seeps to collect the oil. But not all of them seep enough to make that worth while. Drilling would further reduce the seepage and help get more oil OUT of the water.
Posted by: crosspatch at June 24, 2008 06:55 AM (/XgUc)
Posted by: railwriter at June 24, 2008 07:15 AM (nwEiU)
Posted by: crosspatch at June 24, 2008 07:37 AM (/XgUc)
So much for leadership in Congress. there are now 9 different bils in congress to address speculation. all basically does the same thing nationalize the futures market.
All these bills will do is push oil trading into other exchanges, not regulated by the USA and thus our enemies will be more likely to raise the price of oil against us.
Simply raise margin requirments this will stop some of the speculation. Anything more will raise prices not lower them
Oh yeah no bills for more drilling from the dems yet. My question is what happens to BHO after the speculation bills pass and oil continues up to $200/bll?
Can you say massive defeat/landslide at the polls.
Posted by: unseen at June 24, 2008 09:27 AM (aVGmX)
Every few years like clockwork, the envirowhackjobs here at UCSB start whining about all the oil on the beaches, blaming the local oil drilling companies. It usually takes a couple of months for the local news to start realizing "oh yeah, oil seeps....".
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 24, 2008 09:32 AM (Ds4I5)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 24, 2008 09:46 AM (4qoDU)
Posted by: pajama momma at June 24, 2008 10:24 AM (f3xJa)
Posted by: baldilocks at June 24, 2008 10:25 AM (4qoDU)
How's that "liberals don't like drilling" strawman working for you?
How's that drive-by trolling working out for you?
Posted by: hhuummbbeerrtt at June 24, 2008 10:32 AM (f7A+e)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 24, 2008 10:42 AM (pzen5)
I got back a canned email fully worthy of Pelosi, that mumbled about "preserving scenic beauty" (that would be the view of Malibu elites) and complete blather about "new technologies" coming to the rescue. That would be new technologies that won't be available for 20 - 30 years, and that the Dems won't let anyone use anyway unless it's absolute magic.
Short version; Ahnold to the the little people: "Screw you".
Years ago, I read a definition of a Sierra Club member as someone who was personally offended that there was more to electricity than the socket in the wall. Not much has changed.
Posted by: GaryS at June 24, 2008 10:43 AM (iBizo)
For me, the backlash comes from the refusal of the hardcore environmentalists to engage in any kind of balancing. Pollution bad, m'kay? But blocking nuclear power for 30 years leads to worse pollution and worse outcomes. So if people are ready to grow up and face the fact that life is full of choices, then that's great.
Of course then I wake up and remember people are slack jawed idiots who think that 8% profit margins constitute a windfall.
Posted by: alexthechick at June 24, 2008 11:12 AM (GknYa)
Well, since environmentalists are not terribly bright or scientifically literate maybe we can convince them that drilling is a good way to prevent the natural seepage of oil into the ocean by lessening the pressure beneath the surface. Or we could argue that the naturally occurring, oil eating bacteria in the ocean are about to become extinct so we need to create tiny, isolated ecosystems called oil wells to feed them.
Hey, if they can make sh#t up then why can't we?
Posted by: BenFranklin at June 24, 2008 11:24 AM (r11nM)
Posted by: XBradTC at June 24, 2008 11:32 AM (kddTy)
Sorry Alex, but the "environmental" movement hasn't been about the environment for 30 years.
...but I don't understand preservationists getting into a huff...
cthulhu at June 23, 2008 07:57 PM
Thank you very much for using the correct term,
these people should never be called Environmentalists.
Posted by: A. Weasel at June 24, 2008 11:38 AM (bqcfE)
GRC at June 24, 2008
Wrote my congressman and told him to tell the environmentalists to sit down and shut up.
Not sure if it will do any good. But we have to make our reps aware that the environmentalists have gotten out of control.
Posted by: unseen at June 24, 2008 12:50 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: exdem13 at June 24, 2008 05:36 PM (fenBi)
Posted by: pby at June 24, 2008 08:49 PM (MMczV)
Posted by: Louis Vuitton at September 18, 2009 01:38 AM (0KIjA)
Posted by: ugg boots at October 08, 2009 10:08 AM (VTad6)
oh my god!
Posted by: timberland boots at October 08, 2009 10:12 AM (VTad6)
Posted by: chanel glasses at November 24, 2009 08:04 AM (fzJYR)
Posted by: dfkj at December 18, 2009 02:05 AM (CQuij)
Let's Think Out Of The Box Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On The Net Tricks and Tips Big Conspiracies
Posted by: Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On The Net at January 12, 2010 01:48 PM (1d5+d)
Posted by: zy at February 01, 2010 12:27 AM (LUbnV)
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.









