Ace of Spades HQ

March 31, 2005

Here's a Crazy Idea: Require ID to Vote
— Ace

Sounds nuts, I know, but if you need to show ID to get a library card, I really think it's not an invasion of privacy nor a chilling of voting rights to show an ID when you vote for the government of the United States.

Woot! Right Wing News F I N A L L Y acknowledges the Only Important Blog On This Internet as one of his favorite blogs. And at number nine, no less.

Welcome to the party, pal.

Posted by: Ace at 06:46 AM | Comments (12)
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Here in the Land of Cheese our legislature keeps passing a law requiring ID and our moron Governor keeps vetoing it. Need I mention which party he belongs to? If it weren't for voter fraud here we'd probably be part of Jesusland instead of South Canada.

Posted by: BrewFan at March 31, 2005 06:57 AM (Byr3j)

2 What exactly are the arguments against this? I don't understand how this can be a bad thing. It seems so simple and yet so obvious.

Posted by: Mob at March 31, 2005 07:19 AM (f+cPk)

3 I fell to number 40 on his list. :-( The only thing that's keeping me going is knowing I'm #1 on your list of loathsome New Yorkers.

Posted by: Karol at March 31, 2005 07:20 AM (NFi+H)

4 I didn't say you were #1, Karol. Just on the list.

Somewhere in the thirties, I think. Hell, that's almost complimentary.

Posted by: ace at March 31, 2005 07:20 AM (Q6+G6)

5 What exactly are the arguments against this? I don't understand how this can be a bad thing. It seems so simple and yet so obvious

Take a wild f'n' guess.

Posted by: ace at March 31, 2005 07:21 AM (Q6+G6)

6 Being a resident of Georgia, I find this absolutely insane.

I'm also pretty sure that most of the politicians complaining about having to show ID when voting will be out of a job if/when this measure comes to pass. Of course, not because they opposed the measure, but because they won't be able to fraud their way into office anymore.

Heck, if we are really lucky, this *might* enable us to get that whackjob McKinney out of office (again).

Posted by: PotatoHeadBobby at March 31, 2005 07:38 AM (+VFuI)

7 Take a wild f'n' guess.

Something about Bob Dole's cock?

But seriously, I can imagine why some people might not like a more secure voting process, but I'm just wondering if there are actual rational reasons why some people think this is a bad idea.

Posted by: Mob at March 31, 2005 07:55 AM (f+cPk)

8 I want to be #1!

Posted by: Karol at March 31, 2005 08:04 AM (NFi+H)

9 With your personality and attitude, I think you've got a genuine shot.

Posted by: ace at March 31, 2005 08:37 AM (Q6+G6)

10 Yeah, this ranks right up with allowing foreign nationals and convicted fellons vote. Makes no sense to me either.

Posted by: Cracka Jack at March 31, 2005 09:37 AM (pCEIx)

11 Do you think RWN put INDC at 40 (tied with AN) just to show that he didn't accidently leave him off the list?

Posted by: michael dennis at March 31, 2005 04:30 PM (ipjUv)

12 To a large extent, this post that has explained some contents very carefully and totally. It really contains a lot of aspects of something that we are very eager to know and are very necessary to us in our daily life. Firstly , this post can do its best to tell some points of products very truly and believeable, which is some posts can't do well. Secondly, this post can consider something important from our buyers stand, which is very helpful to our life ,work, and so on. Last but not least ,the most important respect is that it can lead us to know right and total news,and tell us what perfect things really are. From the bottom of my heart , we really need this excellent kind of posts and we will obtain more and more beneifits than ever before. Thanks a lot!

Posted by: Pandora Sale Charms at June 23, 2011 01:52 AM (980My)

Hide Comments | Add Comment