September 30, 2008
— Ace 49-43. The eight-point lead Obama opened over the weekend and held on Monday was, I hope, just a blip.
Posted by: Ace at
08:54 AM
| Comments (45)
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Rasputin at September 30, 2008 08:58 AM (Z5vhr)
Perhaps recriminations and hoarding gold, guns, and ammunition are not the best approaches right now. Keep pounding the press, sending your paper the FFMM videos to the papers, news shows and friends who may actually care.
Give money, volunteer to phone people. McCain had the lead before. He can get it again.
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 30, 2008 09:00 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Seventy People at September 30, 2008 09:00 AM (Vp5gu)
Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at September 30, 2008 09:05 AM (8D00g)
Posted by: Justnashole at September 30, 2008 09:07 AM (uAytX)
Wishfull thinking ahead....
I'm seeing all kinds of press on the coming disaster that the vp debate will be on Thursday. How Palin has failed miserably in a couple of mock debates, the campaign hierachy is worried, even quoted as saying "what are we going to do?" Here is the wishful thinking. Is the campaign sandbagging O/Biden? Is it possible that Palin comes out guns blazing and destroys Biden and rides to the rescue again? She can't be as bad as we have seen, can she? It may be one of the last game changers available, we are slowly running out of time.
Posted by: Judd at September 30, 2008 09:13 AM (BXHeE)
Posted by: SueM at September 30, 2008 09:21 AM (YgYdr)
I guess I'll only slit one wrist and wait till Thursday night.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at September 30, 2008 09:26 AM (jNL+b)
Someone get through to the McCain camp that in the final two debates, he cannot afford to look at Obama's undefended jaw and not throw a haymaker.
Oh, fuck, who am I kidding. He can't merely fly over the exhaust port in the Death Star in an X-Wing.
Use the Force, John.
Posted by: INCITEmarsh at September 30, 2008 09:27 AM (oPFyu)
Posted by: Ken at September 30, 2008 09:28 AM (3rbzb)
There is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with Wattching Beavis & Butthead BUTTMUNCH!!!!
Don't make me slap you again Beavis !!!! LOL!!!!
Beavis & Butthead were GREAT
Posted by: PaRep at September 30, 2008 09:29 AM (dWdDN)
Posted by: mesablue at September 30, 2008 09:31 AM (5yNaE)
Battleground took out the Party weighting starting yesterday for some reason, No one seems to know why, DON'T BUY INTO THAT YET
Posted by: PaRep at September 30, 2008 09:31 AM (dWdDN)
Judd--
This is Campaigning 101: if you are at all worried about your candidate's performance in an upcoming debate, leak stories about how poor they are at debating. Lower expectations at all costs. This is one place where the Republicans can use the media's bias against them for their own purposes: they are itching to run as many "Palin is stupid" stories as they can get. If she then performs competently, you get to crow about how she exceeded the media's expectations.
But I must admit I am a little worried since this will be her first time on a stage like this with her opponent right there. She needs to come through or we are that much closer to all of our children being taught to sing paens to our Great Leader.
Posted by: Scott at September 30, 2008 09:33 AM (9ypY/)
Scott,
I understand the expectations game. My point is that they actually are not worried at all, but excited.
Posted by: Judd at September 30, 2008 09:37 AM (BXHeE)
Posted by: Justnashole at September 30, 2008 09:40 AM (uAytX)
You're a Moron She Tore Murkowski a new ASSHOLE in the Alaskan Governors Debate & Murkowski was a U.S. Senator for 22 years
Posted by: PaRep at September 30, 2008 09:40 AM (dWdDN)
Head scratcher to say the least, No one knows why
Posted by: PaRep at September 30, 2008 09:42 AM (dWdDN)
This may sound silly, but I think just to send a message to Washington, those of the conservative persuasion should just vote straight Republican.
And speaking as a concerned Christian, might I say that this entire financial mess wouldn't have happened if Biblical principles had been followed? What churches do Barney Frank and Chris Dodd attend anyway? Trinity?
Posted by: Publicserf at September 30, 2008 09:46 AM (5BQAp)
Posted by: Jamie at September 30, 2008 09:50 AM (I8BSp)
When you abandon the field of battle, suspend your campaign, it makes it easy for the enemy to advance.
Let's hope he can make up the losses.
Karl, call me on the Tin Hat, channel 6.
Kemp
Posted by: Kempermanx at September 30, 2008 09:57 AM (qvT/A)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 30, 2008 09:57 AM (Xl9pj)
McCain/Palin was winning before this financial crisis. We need to get it behind us, fast. That McCain is within striking distance during a crisis like this means that we have at least an even chance of winning. IMHO McCain/Palin should:
1) go on the offensive on Obama's/Dems ties to the financial crisis, specifically their failure to properly regulate. Do not let them get away with the story that Republican free marketeers screwed the little guy to favor their Wall Street friends, when the truth is the exact opposite and we have it on C-Span. Today's ad was a good beginning.
2) tie the previous point to the McCain/Palin maverick reform image, pronto. And repeat.
3) irrespective of her debate performance, put Palin out there to fire up the base and reach out to white women. She's a great, great asset. She could read the phone book for all I care. Put her in ads, put her on talk radio, let her be herself. Let Palin talk reform. Let her talk about her Alaskan successes. Let her make the contrast between between on the one hand Obama and the Dems helping to create the financial crisis, and on the other hand McCain's efforts to regulate this mess before it happened and her record of reform in Alaskan politics.
We can win this.
Posted by: Barracudameister at September 30, 2008 10:00 AM (LMgrC)
Posted by: Rasputin at September 30, 2008 10:03 AM (Z5vhr)
about this coming nightmare of a bailout.
Obama just became more palatable if he is elected.
His trillion dollar entitlement ideas and massive tax increases just became a no-go.
Posted by: trainer at September 30, 2008 10:05 AM (vbTHr)
Is this happening? We were all fired up after her convention speech but have not seen any building on that foundation since then (maybe it is happening locally at the stump?), the original enthusiasm seems to be fading.
Here's hoping that what we all envision regarding Sarah will soon materialize. I am loosing a little faith.
Posted by: don_erico at September 30, 2008 10:17 AM (sDDDA)
Look, unless Obama is up by 10 points or more there's no reason for even concern - the bias, bradley, and obama girl effects all push him up by that much at least. Even assuming the polls are of any value whatsoever.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 30, 2008 10:18 AM (0+Ggj)
In fact, judging these developments, it seems that McCain and his party maybe should have spoken the fuck up.
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 30, 2008 10:29 AM (QxSug)
Regarding Palin:
There is a news embargo on her on all material that could remotely be considered positive for her. Biden is under a similar embargo, only preventing any negative material from being released. That is why Biden is never in the news...everything he says is wrong. Palin may do ok in the debates as long as she remembers to call Biden on his bullshit.
Remember Obama and Biden are walking gaffe machines.
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 30, 2008 10:32 AM (QxSug)
I understand the expectations game. My point is that they actually are not worried at all, but excited.
I wish I shared your optimism. I like Palin, thought she was the best pick for McCain, and continue to think so.
But those who think she'll change, chameleon-like, are letting their hopes cloud their judgment. I watched the Gibson, Hannity and Couric interviews. She had a few good moments. Mostly, she was at times bad, at times absolutely horrible bordering on the embarassing.
Do you think she/the campaign did that deliberately? Just to lower expectations? Do you think that they thought it would be a good idea to give seriously bad, at times incoherent answers - just so that people would initially believe she is not up to the job only to "surprise" them later? Were they hoping for the electorate to say after the debate, "Well, she's not as incompetent as I thought she was." If Palin was so good at this, wouldn't it be wiser, and more beneficial, for he to display it at each interview/event, so that with each good performance the public would see that she really is that good and not a fluke? Wouldn't the better public reaction be: "Wow, she really is good."
I am hoping for the best, but I do not expect a magical transformation of her abilities.
Posted by: angler at September 30, 2008 10:42 AM (kSuu1)
in the end...they won't vote for him. there aren't enough nuts to get him elected unless you count the biggest nut of all A.C.O.R.N....
Posted by: christmasghost at September 30, 2008 10:46 AM (aUut1)
Posted by: Twinks at September 30, 2008 11:01 AM (7QUxD)
Posted by: George Orwell at September 30, 2008 11:04 AM (iHBRF)
Just for the Record I love Ren & Stimpy to YOU IDIOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!
Posted by: PaRep at September 30, 2008 11:05 AM (dWdDN)
"because the only ones home are toking up the devil-weed and watching Beavis and Butthead. "
Yeah, I remember my college years. Good times.
Posted by: slug at September 30, 2008 11:07 AM (n8Nln)
Posted by: Lincoln Adams at September 30, 2008 11:10 AM (gLNLT)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:11 AM (1g+FW)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:13 AM (1g+FW)
Posted by: The Obvious at September 30, 2008 11:16 AM (1g+FW)
Tilting at windmills, guys.
This bird is cooked. Obama, short of some dead body, is not going to give up this lead. I don't think Palin is going to make a difference, even if she does cream Biden, they have made her radioactive to the population. My wife (straight down the middle, apolitical, working mom) was saying last night how Palin didn;t have the "pedigree" to be VP. When asked what pedigree the O had, she moved to experience, when questioned on that, she moved to knowledge, when questioned on that, she moved to intelligence, and when questioned on that she responded with Harvard and he spoke well at the debate. This is what it has come down to and I feel that my house is not unique.
I wish I could say better.
Perhaps looking down the pike, its better for the conservative cause not to be "in charge" when the real sh*tstorm comes through. Midterms is were the focus should be.
Small silver lining, O thru 2012 does realy put a fork in Hillary.
Hoping I'm wrong.
Posted by: Old Texas Turkey at September 30, 2008 12:05 PM (r/CWb)
This may sound silly, or even outlandish, but it seems to me that at first Obama was going to win big-time. Then McCain picked Palin and he got a bounce. Now the economy is having problems and Obama is ahead again.
For McCain to win this requires something besides McCain to influence the electorate. Because McCain is as passive as a prisoner in a cell hoping to avoid another beating.
Either that, or I could try being better informed and keeping notes. Or I could try volunteering for the proverbial worthy cause. Naaaaah.
Posted by: Publicserf at September 30, 2008 12:36 PM (5BQAp)
Posted by: Gran at September 30, 2008 02:12 PM (mTWN+)
Posted by: Gran at September 30, 2008 02:18 PM (mTWN+)
Posted by: vivian at December 11, 2010 09:01 PM (CXcwz)
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 07, 2011 10:23 PM (JsxNx)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









