October 29, 2009
— Ace This story says they're charged, but a later story say they were arraigned today.
Three minors — 15, 16 and 17 — are each charged with felony rape with a foreign object. The charges all carry an enhancement that they acted in concert, which could make them eligible for life in prison if found true, Deputy District Attorney Dara Cashman said.The 16-year-old also has been charged with robbery. Cashman charged a fourth suspect, 19-year-old Manuel Ortega, with robbery, assault causing great bodily injury, rape in concert and an enhancement that also makes him eligible for life in prison.
The youths were charged as adults "because this crime speaks to a high degree of callousness and viciousness," said Contra Costa Deputy District Attorney Dan Cabral, head of the office's juvenile division
Cashman and Richmond police detectives said Wednesday that they expect to make more arrests in the case. A fifth suspect arrested Tuesday night, 21-year-old Salvador Rodriguez, remains in custody but has not been charged.
Here's a dumb opinion piece by, I guess, a local columnist:
They laughed. They snapped pictures. For two hours, they took turns beating and raping a drunk, defenseless girl. Fine Saturday night fun.The details of the brutal gang rape outside the Richmond High School homecoming dance last weekend chill my soul. The 15-year-old was lured to a "party" by a "friend" only to find out she was to be the evening's entertainment. Dozens of people wandered by and thought it was funny.
I wonder what sort of twisted young people would get their kicks out of participating in such an attack. I wonder what kind of callous young people would stand by and watch, or see what was going on and hurry away, but never try to stop it or even call police. Surely they must have precious women in their lives. Mothers, sisters, grandmothers. Yet no one cared what happened to the victim, who had to be airlifted to a hospital in critical condition. How could young people be so cruel and inhuman?
One of the young women who called the cops as soon as they heard about the attack tried to offer an explanation: "They think it's cool," she told our reporter. "They weren't raised to respect girls."
They weren't raised to respect girls.
Is that it?
We do not, as a society, respect girls. We teach them from birth that sexy is cute, sexy is beautiful, sexy is the way to get attention. From baby shirts that say "Hot Chick" to preschool dance classes where little girls learn to bump and grind, there's no escaping it. By the time they're in middle school, girls know that sexy gets more attention from boys than brainy or athletic or tough.
And it goes on like that, eventually mentioning video games or something.
Look, I understand women's horror at this. I happen to share it. But, just to be accurate about this, one is underinclusive when one says these thugs did not "respect women."
They did not respect humans, period. They are animals lacking the most basic empathetic spark that typically restrains human beings from beating or raping each other brutally -- the empathy that makes such monstrous behavior difficult to even contemplate, let alone perform.
For two hours.
In front of an apparently entertained crowd.
On Twitter, Greg Pollowitz says "Death penalty for all of them, including the spectators." I agree. And I know there's no law to get to such just punishment, but then, as they say, no jury in the world would convict you.
The problem isn't that we're raising boys who don't respect girls. Or, rather, that is a problem too, but not really the problem here. Yes, they targeted her because, as a girl, she had what they wanted. But it's hard to imagine that a vulnerable, lone man who had something they wanted -- including simple humanity that they could shatter for their jollies (stuff like this is, as they say, also about dominance and pure cruelty rather than sex alone) -- would get better treatment from these vermin.
"Respecting women" is a lesson they need to learn. But that's kind of nuance they could only appreciate after a long lesson in Why it's a bad thing to prey upon human beings as if you're brutish jackals.
Actually, the hell with learning. Kill them in prison. And yeah, rape them in prison. With my blessing.
We have monsters in our society and no one much seems to care.
One local article notes that "interest in the case in cyberspace" is high.
In cyberspace? Um, why not in the leftwing media? Is this story somehow not interesting enough?
We know why. It's not that this story doesn't have national policy implications. The trouble for the leftwing media is that it obviously, incandescently does have national policy implications about which they wish to keep silent. As it's impolite.
Well, the crime rate among blacks and Latinos is viciously high. Lives are shattered, and snuffed out, every day because of this.
Can we perhaps get over our political correctness and treat this as a problem, maybe?
I don't know if spotlighting the problem would help. As I mentioned in my previous post*, the Kitty Genovese murder shocked the country out of complacency about crime, and cowardice in the face of crime.
But for that to happen, people have to know about it.
* Which I put into draft because some idiot decided it was the perfect time to let loose a torrent of racial animus. I would appreciate if this does not happen again.
Posted by: Ace at
01:09 PM
| Comments (258)
Post contains 943 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: vastrightwingconspirator at October 29, 2009 01:15 PM (7FgWm)
Liberalism is the enemy of women.
Examples:
Treatment of Ted Kennedy over his victim
Treatment of Bill Clinton over his victim
Treatment of David Letterman over his employees
Treatment of Polansky over his victims
Treatment of Sarah Palin in general
Treatment of Bristol Palin
Treatment of John Edwards over his wife
Treatment of Keith Olbermann over Michelle Malkin
Treatment of Carrie Prejan
Treatment of Jessica Simpson by Liberal MSM and sportswriters - somehow any problems the entire Cowboys team had can be traced to her.
Liberal Representative Alan Grayson calls Linda Robinson a whore
Treatment of Kennedy over Marilyn Monroe
Anyone here want to add more to the list? I think we see the pattern though.
Posted by: Def Leppard at October 29, 2009 01:15 PM (hIOnV)
Posted by: Concious, but wandering aimlessly at October 29, 2009 01:15 PM (kn+jW)
Posted by: Uniball at October 29, 2009 01:16 PM (27iEn)
This country has no law enforcement problem that cannot be addressed by a correct dosage of Buford Pusser whoopass stick. Especially these punks and those like them.
My bet would be that they will be meeting some foreign objects very, very soon anyway.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at October 29, 2009 01:17 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: ECM at October 29, 2009 01:18 PM (q3V+C)
Posted by: the angel of death in a funny hat at October 29, 2009 01:18 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 29, 2009 01:18 PM (TZazt)
Posted by: non_dhimmie at October 29, 2009 01:20 PM (cFwGO)
I disagree a little. I do think that women/girls are more likely targets for sexual assaults in part because of society's conflicted messages about women and sex/sexuality. It is more likely that a girl who is gang raped will have to fend off insinuations and accusations that she asked for it than a boy would.
There is something basic at our core as a society that resists treating people as people, regardless of their gender or sexual preferences.
That cuts many ways, of course, but in the context of a girl getting gang raped the net effect is that there is not as much consistent outrage as it deserves.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:21 PM (sey23)
Posted by: Ted K. at October 29, 2009 01:22 PM (Ie2IY)
Way beyond the pale of what we have acceded to accept.
Posted by: Brennan at October 29, 2009 01:22 PM (9kAmX)
Hey, those four boys represent four votes...no way the left wants to lose that.
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 29, 2009 01:23 PM (QxSug)
Not only is there no such law, thanks to me you are forbidden to ever enact one.
You're welcome.
Posted by: His Royal Majesty...Anthony M. Kennedy at October 29, 2009 01:24 PM (ur6Ar)
Rape should be considered torture. Unless the person at the receiving end is UBL or his pals, I don't see where it has a place in our society.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:24 PM (sey23)
Posted by: Frank G at October 29, 2009 01:24 PM (I+To0)
Um, actually, can any one find a story of a group of teens attacking and raping a man or boy, to the amusement of the crowd and taping it to post on YouTube...
I actually do think the sex of the victim was important. Call me crazy if you want, but, being a girl, I have definitely been the target of actions that no self-respecting guy would perpetrate on another guy outside the context of a gay bar or pride parade. And I was just in a public setting. She was victimized, not because she "had something they wanted." Seriously, do you think some guy wearing a Rolex or driving a nice car would have gotten the same treatment?
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 01:25 PM (GF971)
>>The problem is that we have monsters in our society and no one much seems to care.
Islam society too. Why do you think they separate Boys from Girls? Boys gotta have it and they get frustrated to the point of dying for 72 virgins. They are controlled with the hope of PussyKitteh.
The Death penalty is called for in this Richmond case.
Posted by: sickinmass at October 29, 2009 01:26 PM (rYWEB)
Some don't care and others are willing to blame external factors rather than the monsters themselves. I had to take a prison-industrial complex seminar for college and pretty much everyone in class agreed that everyone who's ever been jailed was put there because of "the Man." They commit crimes because they're poor and/or society is racist/sexist/etc. Not because they're heartless sociopaths.
And, as evidenced in the CA judicial system, criminals get more rights than the victims and families of victims. See Tookie Williams or OJ Simspon.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:26 PM (GZnia)
I have to say that although I rarely misspell words when I write for work, or even when I write a letter, I find that I also tend to make spelling errors of the lone/loan (their/there, where/wear) variety on blogs. I think it's something to do with the "conversational" tone of this type of writing.
Just my theory.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:27 PM (sey23)
I know, I know...how racist of me.
They should be impaled.
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at October 29, 2009 01:27 PM (4uxzF)
Posted by: TM at October 29, 2009 01:27 PM (NFj8b)
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 01:28 PM (qP2BK)
They did not respect humans, period. They are animals lacking the most basic empathetic spark
Ayup. Empathy, the hallmark of normal people.
And. Never forget: There are two types of empathy. 1) generalized empathy: the kind that acts like the rubber bumpers that keeps us from simply being obnoxious and running over each other or, say, raping someone (those who have a sense of empathy), and, 2) those who use empathy merely as a tool (the generalized sense of empathy-rubber-bumpers is missing).
Now you know how to solve the empathy problem when you see the out of control narcissist operate with obvious empathy.
Posted by: Motionlock at October 29, 2009 01:28 PM (piBto)
Where's Daddy of girl? He should be in cuffs for the revenge murder of 5 or 6 douchebags.
Only then will shit like this stop.
Posted by: Pelvis at October 29, 2009 01:28 PM (LlaBi)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at October 29, 2009 01:29 PM (pZEar)
Posted by: Pelvis at October 29, 2009 01:29 PM (LlaBi)
I guess the next story we will hear (at least for the minority perps) that they grew up in impoverished fatherless homes without anyone who loved them, blah, blah, blah. Well, boo freaking hoo.
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 01:29 PM (qP2BK)
We are raising a whole generation just like thsese and you are correct, it is not just women it is any living thing, including animals.
See: Vick, Michael
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:29 PM (sey23)
(sracesm off, and obviously so)
-Brennan
Posted by: Brennan at October 29, 2009 01:30 PM (9kAmX)
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 01:31 PM (bftbi)
to tout, "It's because these boys are impoverished and victims of society that they did this horrible thing. And the ho was asking for it." Ok, they'll say that last part nicer, but it'll be there.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:31 PM (GZnia)
Posted by: paranoid polly at October 29, 2009 01:32 PM (r7Vc3)
Posted by: Thesher at October 29, 2009 01:32 PM (DG56/)
Um, actually, can any one find a story of a group of teens attacking and raping a man or boy, to the amusement of the crowd and taping it to post on YouTube...
Wasn't posted on YouTube, as far as I know, but the couple Ace posted about yesterday were both raped and tortured by youths. One victim was a guy.
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 29, 2009 01:32 PM (TZazt)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:33 PM (GZnia)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 01:33 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:34 PM (sey23)
Posted by: Jay at October 29, 2009 01:35 PM (ZxE4n)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Bacons, and the Odd Meteor at October 29, 2009 01:35 PM (erIg9)
Dear Diary,
Note to self.......... Must remember to appoint Salvador Rodriguez as my new gender equality Tsar.
Til next time Dear Diary,
Barry
OsamaHusseinIslamObama 2012'
(the terrorist-Uighur-ACORN-media choice)
-It's never too early to campaign-
Posted by: Barry Soetoro (D-King OF The World!) at October 29, 2009 01:35 PM (wplTJ)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 29, 2009 01:35 PM (TZazt)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:35 PM (GZnia)
And this is why we like Dirty Harry. In the circles where PC is trafficked so readily and, ironically, callously, most make the unjustifiable trade-off of personal security over sacrifice. When one strays and actually does sacrifice by rejecting PC behavior and intervening, most privately cheer but still remain publicly silent. That's the paradigm we need to mercilessly kill along with those who would partake in such barbaric assaults.
Mob behavior remains a scourge and an unavoidable condition of society. However, we do have the intellect to overcome the innate if we have the courage to both recognize/understand the "flaw" and train ourselves to confront it.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 29, 2009 01:36 PM (C3uAX)
Now you know how to solve the empathy problem when you see the out of control narcissist operate with obvious empathy.
I feel like I need to elaborate, since that example is so lame. Some have an incredible sense of empathy. And they use it to preach, to play poker, sell a stock, or to persuade a crowd and win an election--they use it as a tool or a means to gain an end. If there is no end to be secured, there is no empathy. Why waste the effort?
Those with a normal sense of empathy have it on all the time. All. The. Time. Not simply when they need to use it to improve their position.
Posted by: Motionlock at October 29, 2009 01:36 PM (piBto)
Yeah, it would suck to be that guy, wouldn't it?..oh, well, life sucks. I think we should all have fun hanging separately, since we do not appear to be able to hang together.
Posted by: Count of Monte Cristo at October 29, 2009 01:37 PM (cE6Nr)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 29, 2009 01:38 PM (QxSug)
Was he a known or suspected homosexual?
He was raped and killed with his girlfriend, so I'm assuming he was straight. Were you trying to be funny?
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 29, 2009 01:38 PM (TZazt)
I'm surprised that Knoxville case has gotten so little coverage. Michelle Malkin was on it like white on rice. Y'all can go to her site for all the background on it. It's just as horrific as this one. And it won't be classified as a hate crime because the perpetrators were black and victims were white.
Yup, already happened. Wasn't prosecuted as an hate crime. Yet Matthew Shepherd's death was an hate crime even though the dude who killed him was bisexual. Go figure.
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 01:38 PM (qP2BK)
Get out of my mindthoughts!
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at October 29, 2009 01:38 PM (C3uAX)
I should amend that to coverage on the blogs. I know why it's not being covered in the news.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:39 PM (GZnia)
One victim was a guy.
Was he a known or suspected homosexual?
know the attacker carjacked a boyfriend and girl friend
they raped them both. They cut off the boys penis and anally raped him, then i believe shot him and set him on fire and left him near railroad tracks.
they raped the girl in every conceivable way. poured bleach down her throat to destroy the evidence then killed her too.
that is from my memory, there were more gruesome details.
one of the most disgusting parts was, apparently the main rapist murderer told the girl if she had sex with them they would let her go. So the defense tried to claim that it wasn't rape based on that.
its fucked up(sorry ace, the f word is deserved here)
I would look it up and read about it. It makes me feel bad about being a human being.
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 01:39 PM (bftbi)
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I would love to see every prison have a 23 hour lockdown every day, with one hour a day to get some fresh air and take your weekly shower. Stop with all of the rehabilitation crap and mete out some real punishment. Until then, I hope Bubba makes each and every one of them his wife.
Posted by: Shivv at October 29, 2009 01:39 PM (00mcl)
As for Ace's point, I agree with him that their lack of human empathy is the root of the problem, and applies equally to all genders. These same people who did nothing about this girl getting tormented would have also been entertained watching their friends beat a guy to death.
But, I think his phrasing wasn't very clear; there definitely is a gender problem in society, particularly in the low class, where the boundary between romantic pursuit and intimidating behavior has become very blurry. That's not what happened here, though.
Posted by: sandy burger at October 29, 2009 01:40 PM (VC56G)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 01:41 PM (ObTcs)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 06:33 PM (GZnia)
Ha! Ha! I can read your mind-thoughts--I'm applying for that new Mind-Thoughts Czar position that's opening up in the Bamster's administration. You know, if you can't beat them, join them!
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 01:41 PM (qP2BK)
Posted by: ace at October 29, 2009 01:41 PM (mT0zX)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:42 PM (GZnia)
Why isn't the media paying attention?
Because only one of the accused is white.
The rest open too many questions about what liberal parenting, liberal immigration laws, and liberals ignoring minority members who commit crimes produces.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at October 29, 2009 01:43 PM (TizM+)
No. You didn't provide a link or any details so I didn't know what case you were referencing.
I think rape that is committed as part of a murder is different than raping someone and leaving them alive. To me the former is just part of the act of killing that person - robbing them of their dignity as part of robbing their humanity before you take away their life. I imagine it's easier to dispose of someone, particularly a man, after you've subjected him to that sort of torture.
Raping a girl with a crowd watching and in public suggests you have no concerns about being held accountable. A part of that feeling may be that there is still an undercurrent of 'she asked for it' running in our society. As I recall, I read some comments to that effect (or to the effect of 'how do we know it wasn't consensual?') here and elsewhere yesterday.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:43 PM (sey23)
Posted by: runninrebel at October 29, 2009 01:43 PM (i3PJU)
Posted by: ace at October 29, 2009 01:43 PM (mT0zX)
Posted by: ace at October 29, 2009 06:41 PM (mT0zX)
Jeez, Ace, calm down. It's not like it was rape rape, it was just rape. Sheesh!
Posted by: Whoopie Goldberg, Criminal Justice Expert at October 29, 2009 01:43 PM (qP2BK)
I guess I am in the minority with you - I agree about the 23 hour lockdown too.
Also, if you rape ...automatic castration.
Posted by: paranoid polly at October 29, 2009 01:44 PM (r7Vc3)
I hear you. I still occasionally find myself asking the inevitable "is it its or it is" question to confirm proper apostrophization (I plead proudly guilty to making that word up, according to the faux grammar experts Bill Gates hired) when writing missives on a daily basis.
I guess I was just stunned by the nature of the mistake. I know Ace is a more than capable and, in fact, an exemplary writer, although he does make the occasional mistake, as we all do. Were I under the pressure he is, I doubt I would produce as consistenly superior copy as he does.
I admit to being a stick-in-the-mud here. But my point was made, methinks.
Furthermore, I think Ace counts coup on having overly anal grammarians (grammarists? grammarsmiths? wordsworkers?) chime in. Anything that boosts Ace's ego above its perennially low energy budget, I'm fully behind!
Cheers,
Brennan
Excelsior!
(In the channeling Stan Lee sense, not the wood chip sense.)
Posted by: Brennan at October 29, 2009 01:44 PM (9kAmX)
You think apart from rape they were good citizens?
Shit, you're not supposed to make me bust a gut in a serious thread. Ha!
Posted by: Motionlock at October 29, 2009 01:44 PM (piBto)
Posted by: mare at October 29, 2009 01:45 PM (X1fsj)
What it is is fast writing where my fingers are three second behind my brain. My "active brain" is three words ahead, writing the next several words. Words are dumped into the "passive brain" muscle memory type part of the brain, where stuff like loan and lone get confused.
All this while simultaneously chugging Value-Rite, skinning an hobo, and surfing busty lesbian pron. And they say that men can't multi-task! This just proves that Ace is an Unmortal.
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 01:45 PM (qP2BK)
I am so f'n sick of thug culture.
i agree, this is an inner city culture thing. not in all cases of inhumanity, but a lot of this crap is because of the glorification of murder, rape, and all around disgust for your fellow man
please don't read "inner city culture" as code language. I mean it bluntly as a lifestlye that is justified and glorified in urban areas. if some races are over represented so be it, but I think that it is more a mindset that can affect all people growing up in these areas. It's no coincidence that these crime ridden areas produce children prone to crime.
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 01:46 PM (bftbi)
Posted by: Motionlock at October 29, 2009 01:46 PM (piBto)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at October 29, 2009 01:48 PM (TZazt)
This isn't about a failure to respect women, it's about verminous predators who prey on human being generally.
I don't know; it sounds like hate-crime to me.
Posted by: Idiot at October 29, 2009 01:49 PM (piBto)
What is even more pathetic is the simpering response of the school principle:
Trujillo called the rape outside on school grounds "a tragic incident."
"We wished this had never happened. This was such a heinous crime," Trujillo said. "We are all going to learn from this."
Note the passive voice. No thought of fault or blame. Nobody did anything evil, it just happened. Like a storm or earthquake. Learn from this? LEARN? What is there to learn you spineless twit? The only thing to learn from rabid dogs is better marksmanship.
Who stole my country?
Posted by: oLD gUY at October 29, 2009 01:50 PM (P/D33)
Deep down we know that "justice" is rarely served in these cases.
Posted by: The Marker Duo at October 29, 2009 01:50 PM (cxW4X)
Animals do things for reasons which, by and large, help their species survive.
These are anomalies.
-
Posted by: BumperStickerist at October 29, 2009 01:50 PM (ruzrP)
It was a barbaric act, to be sure. And now the 15 and 16 year old perps will have a lifetime of thinking about their crime ahead of them while sitting in stir. But are these boys really products of a decadent society, a debased culture that generates monsters rather than citizens? I don't think so. We do our best to civilize the more barbaric aspects of our personalities away, but come right down to it, we are primates and have the characteristics of primates. We are excitable, quick to anger, given to dominance heirarchies, desirous of group approval, and easily led by stronger peers. These tendencies lead us into many terrible and evil acts.
I guess what I'm saying is: I don't draw any cosmic lesson from this terrible crime. It happens. It will happen again, many times and in many places. If it is to serve as a lesson, the lesson should be that we need to work all the harder at civilization because the veneer has worn very thin indeed in some places.
Posted by: Monty at October 29, 2009 01:51 PM (nTxjg)
And not chemically. I'd be all for castration with a rusty battle ax.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at October 29, 2009 01:51 PM (otlXg)
Where did that come from? I'm asking seriously. When did "thug life" and all that bullshit promoted in rap and hip hop become the "in" thing? I went to a mostly Hispanic/black high school and I'd say 90% of the student body dressed like thugs/cholos/gangbangers even if they weren't in gangs. (Although most of them probably were.) When did this start? Why has it increased? And are people not willing to stop such barbaric actions because they don't want to be viewed as "racist"? Is this a consequence of PC culture and multiculturalism and moral relativism?
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:52 PM (GZnia)
Wow, ace, way to take a comment out of context.
My point was clearly not that they were model citizens. Jerk.
My point was that it was more socially acceptable to victimize the poor girl because people watched and didn't do anything (hence, the "social" aspect of "socially acceptable"). Had it been a boy with "something they wanted" like money, they wouldn't have had people watching and applauding and taping it to post to YouTube for _two_freaking_hours_. Since we don't have a crime like that on record (the Knoxville tragedy was not publicly applauded or condoned), it's likely that the nature of the boy-on-girl rape was considered "okay" by the bystanders (not to mention the perps, who I would happily see burn in this world and the next).
See Def Leppard's post about women being treated by the left. Disrespect for women is pretty rampant, so you would totally discount that as a factor in this case? Misogynist prick.
(see? I can take things out of context, too!)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 01:52 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 01:52 PM (ObTcs)
64 Also, if you rape ...automatic castration.
And not chemically. I'd be all for castration with a rusty battle ax.
Or a plastic knife, like the kind you find at KFC
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 01:54 PM (bftbi)
Posted by: Miss'80sB at October 29, 2009 01:54 PM (ppFId)
And it's why Taken was such an awesome movie. They all fulfill our vigilante fantasies.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 01:55 PM (GZnia)
Send these cretins off to a remote colony and make them coexist with beautiful, sexually adventerous women each of whom possesses high intelligence, a genetic anomally such as time-awareness or photo-memory, perky yabbos that quiver in anticipay ... shun, and firearms.
That'd learn 'em
Posted by: BumperStickerist at October 29, 2009 01:57 PM (ruzrP)
Human beings are unlovely creatures
Monty, guess what? Sometimes you get a person who actually believed all that I'm Third bullshit and has hurt themselves by placing their fellow man ahead of themselves. Not everyone is a self-interested douchebag.
Problem is, for everyone who tries to put the other man second, there are ten million others who would try to use that for personal gain. But it doesn't mean someone wasn't unlovely for some period of time.
Don't project jackassery upon everyone else, even though most might deserve it.
Posted by: Idiot at October 29, 2009 01:57 PM (piBto)
WTR
i think a decent amount of our moral decay came about in the 1960s. Did events like this probably happen before then? I would think so, not in a same frequency, but they happened. I just think after the 1960s this stuff became more acceptable to society as a whole. People stopped being disgusted by disgusting things because they were told everything is relative.
This is behavior that I expect from Congo Militias, not america school kids.
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 01:58 PM (bftbi)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 01:58 PM (ObTcs)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at October 29, 2009 01:58 PM (XzzCe)
I'm all for the 23 hour lockdown. Or work camps. The notion that these a55holes have gyms and tv's and what not is horrendous.
I am somewhat of an anomaly around here, I think, as I am actually opposed to capital punishment (although I would never hold a candle in a friggin' vigil for one of these dudes, nor would I vote against a candidate based on this one issue).
My parents both worked for the federal prison system when I was a tot, then my dad continued to work as a juvenile probation officer and eventually as a social worker at a half-way house program for murders in a state prison system. My mom, rest her soul, was a life-long conservative who first got active in politics by writing columns about prison reform. (Dad was a Kennedy Democrat who switched when McGovern ran.)
I think those experiences, coupled with my natural optimism, shaped my views on capital punishment and how we deal with serious, violent criminals.
I think that our society is capable of achieving great things. I believe in the value of human life, even crappy human life. I know some people can be rehabilitated, even with our imperfect system, and even those who cannot be rehabilitated teach those who work with them about human nature and even evil. I prefer to confront evil and its root causes than to hide it away or eliminate the expressions of it without addressing the causes.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 01:58 PM (sey23)
Posted by: Idiot at October 29, 2009 01:59 PM (piBto)
Patty Fisher lists a Mercury News (San Jose Mercury News) e-mail address.
The Mercury News has had leftists and race-apologists (or worse) as writers for at least 20 years.
They (the writers and their editors) are unable to form satisfactory logical arguments for their positions. They simply silence their critics. Note that the last two thirds of Fisher's article is an attempt to indict (American) society at large.
I'm waiting for a few more details on the attack, specifically the race of each person involved. The citizenship of each attacker should also be made public. I think we will see a truly ugly Truth appear, something the Left wants buried forever.
Posted by: Arbalest at October 29, 2009 01:59 PM (1Hz0q)
some idiot decided it was the perfect time to let loose a torrent of racial animus
Uh oh, killmore guppies looking for some hot troll action?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at October 29, 2009 01:59 PM (cniXs)
The laws of nature, supply and demand and simple justice suggest that these dudes are going to get split wide open early and often when they get to the joint.
Watch your cornholes, studs. Congrats on raping a defenseless girl. Hope it was worth it, coz you will be traded from one cell block to the other for the rest of your un-natural lives for little more than a packet of smokes. Did someone order a cock-meat sandwich???
Posted by: mike d at October 29, 2009 02:01 PM (GV9NL)
I think this is right. Ace is correct that this particular crime was probably more about having no respect for humanity in general and these people (if they even deserve to be called that) were out to dehumanize someone- anyone- in order to get their jollies. But I also know, as a female (and a mother), that our society sends seriously strong messages to women, especially young girls, that the only way to get noticed/be cool is to dress and act "sexy"; and it's occurring at younger and younger ages.
For example, I was looking in a costume store this past week for a Halloween costume for my toddler and I was horrified at the costumes they had in there for girls. The sexy and scantily-clad nurse/pirate/belly dancer/fairy, etc were about all there was for girls around 10 and up. TEN!!! When I was 10, I painted my face green and was a scary witch, complete with hat and broom. There were no parts of my abdomen showing and the outfit covered my knees. No peep-hole cutouts in the chest region of my outfit either.
So, that's the message we're sending to our children now. It's degrading and objectifying to those girls and it degrades and objectifies them in the eyes of their male peers, making them easier targets for violence.
Posted by: Mandy P. at October 29, 2009 02:02 PM (MK6Kx)
Once upon a long time ago, I and another guy removed a girl from a party. She was so drunk, she could not walk. We took her away and put her face-down on a picnic table so if she ralphed (she did) it would go down.
I spent an hour - two hours - watching her until she stirred and could move again. Then I took her home. Loaned her my windbreaker, also. This was all before midnight.
All I thought was that it was lucky that she was with me, a normal human, and not some animal. But it was over twenty years ago.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 29, 2009 02:02 PM (TUWci)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 02:03 PM (ObTcs)
Put 'em in the same room with the shitbirds from Knoxville and give a prize to the survivor.
(The prize is, you get executed last.)
Posted by: logprof at October 29, 2009 02:03 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: Tony B at October 29, 2009 02:03 PM (Qq2zp)
Castration with a wine opener, followed by anal penetration with a basball bat. F those scumbags I hope they all rot in hell and get their cute little virgin a holes raped repeatedly in prison
just my thoughts
Posted by: Todd ( the guy who believes in castration) at October 29, 2009 02:03 PM (LLOGQ)
Let the girl kill them. Call it therapy.
Posted by: Johnathan E. at October 29, 2009 02:05 PM (dQdrY)
At some point, I and many other older citizens, will be deceased, and then the animals can rule.
Until that time, animals BEWARE.
Posted by: NortonPete at October 29, 2009 02:05 PM (fVuwW)
Posted by: The Marker Duo at October 29, 2009 02:06 PM (cxW4X)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at October 29, 2009 02:06 PM (XzzCe)
Thank the feminists for that. Not the ones back in the 60s who were fighting for equality, but the kind today who stood behind OJ because he was black and his wife was white and the ones who are continually silent over the treatment of women in the Muslim world.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:08 PM (GZnia)
White on rice? Michelle Malkin is asian and married to a white guy.
RAAAAACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: fozzy at October 29, 2009 02:08 PM (ccEuN)
Maybe I'm particularly gloomy today but this all looks like the fall of Rome to me. How can this country possibly recover from all this?
It looks like it to me too. But hey! Nancy Pututi unveiled the house healthcare bill today! Isn't that wonderful?
/s *gak*
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at October 29, 2009 02:08 PM (lUbPs)
Me, too. Time to open another beer and find a funnier thread, I guess.
Posted by: Y-not at October 29, 2009 02:10 PM (sey23)
Posted by: non_dhimmie at October 29, 2009 02:10 PM (cFwGO)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:11 PM (GZnia)
Posted by: sTevo at October 29, 2009 02:12 PM (eA3tl)
It's only a matter of time before they start to leak or pop-up.
Posted by: Techie at October 29, 2009 02:13 PM (cxW4X)
Posted by: d at October 29, 2009 02:13 PM (uTknY)
The Kitty Genovese may have shocked the country out of complacency about crime, but nobody did anything about it until Mayor Giuliani in NYC in the 1990s!
Posted by: NJconservative at October 29, 2009 02:14 PM (/Ywwg)
Posted by: chris at October 29, 2009 02:14 PM (/pHM6)
Thank the feminists for that. Not the ones back in the 60s who were fighting for equality, but the kind today who stood behind OJ because he was black and his wife was white and the ones who are continually silent over the treatment of women in the Muslim world.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 07:08 PM (GZnia)
Oh, I do. Believe me. The radical feminists and the leftists have pushed the whole "if it feels good, do it" crap for at least 30 years or so and it's a good deal of what's led to this kind of objectification of young women, in my opinion. Couple that with at least one generation of parents that's too busy "doing their thing" to pay attention to what their little darlings are wearing, watching, and listening to and it's not hard to see how we got to this point.
Posted by: Mandy P. at October 29, 2009 02:15 PM (MK6Kx)
Posted by: John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar at October 29, 2009 02:17 PM (XzzCe)
I don't know why anyone is surprised by this, honestly. And actually I don't think any of you are. The traditional responses and mores of society have been utterly raped themselves by the ridiculous notions made MANDATORY by the mindless fuckweasels who have insinuated themselves into our schools, churches, government, social service organizations: everywhere. An eagle scout preparing for West Point is thrown out of school for having a little knife in his car, despite his felicity with the M-16. A bill just passed that makes "mindcrime" an extenuating factor in any crime you commit. THEY ARE TRYING TO TAX THE FUCKING AIR, PEOPLE. Gang rape is just a symptom of the institutional breakdowns we see all around us.
At least Rome had legalized hookers. We're completely through the looking glass, and have been for a long time.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:17 PM (qWLc4)
And the ones who think having sex with everyone interested is "empowering" instead of just plain sad. They do not have the best interests of women and girls in mind.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 29, 2009 02:18 PM (OkT2m)
@Ace,
The Kitty Genovese may have shocked the country out of complacency about crime, but nobody did anything about it until Mayor Giuliani in NYC in the 1990s!
don't forget Bernie Goetz
Posted by: Ben at October 29, 2009 02:19 PM (bftbi)
Posted by: d at October 29, 2009 02:20 PM (uTknY)
Men have objectified women since the beginning of time. If you knew what we are actually thinking you would never stop hitting us. We are hardwired to notice a tight ass and sweet rack. That is very different from raping them. At least it used to be.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:20 PM (qWLc4)
Mandy,
I'm totally with you. I taught at a dance studio for a year. The "costumes" they put the five and six year olds (and, of course, older), made me cringe. They were belly-baring, boy-shorts sequin numbers with fringe. My contingent were the Irish dancers, so they, at least, were pretty well covered. But the sexualization of those babies made me want to cry. When moms start teaching their girls to respect themselves, I'm praying the culture will follow.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:20 PM (GF971)
I think yes and no on the don't respect women charge. I definitely think the perps don't value any human life (or any life for that matter) beyond their own, but I think that women are especially not valued by them. Here's my reasoning:
Exactly what the article said: we have taught our young women that "sexy" is where it's at. And it is a very hypersexualized, emotionless sexy (I'd say pretty much a pornographic definition of "sexy") -- while I don't really have an issue with adults viewing adults in a pornographic way, I do find it rather disturbing that this rather pornograph-itization has leaked into everyday society and culture and is aimed at younger and younger children, and that especially girls feel the need to make themselves in that image in order to be considered popular and well liked. Likewise it is very disturbing that we have given young men such an emotionally blighted and shallow vision of what relationships (and being manly within that context) are all about.
On top of all this, I think we are starting to see the end result of all the very diligent work the feminists have done, with their "take back the night" and "date rape, just say no" campaigning, to our young people's perceptions of what is appropriate and even safe behavior between people of the opposite sex. I'm no prude and don't think that it's even pragmatic to expect young women to stay virgins until their late 20s and marry and that's it (women have physical urges too -- they also are physically weaker than men usually and are the ones who have babies, and that shouldn't have been overlooked), but it was ridiculous to teach young women that they could "hang with the guys" (often under the influence of alcohol) and be in a completely safe environment -- that isn't how it works; it never has and it never will. All this did was to create more situations where young women were not expected to act responsible towards themselves, and in which campus and town board feminists would hyperventilate over (I remember at the college one young woman claiming to have been "raped" by a group of young men who were guilty of ogling her -- in fairness she was wearing a miniskirt, and I don't know of many men in their early 20s who won't look, and that hardly was a case of rape. This in turn completely devalued the true meaning of the term "rape" (getting ogled or wolf whistled at should never, ever have been term "rape" which some feminists encouraged young women to do, while encouraging them to dress and act in any very sexualized manner -- make no mistake, Girls Gone Wild is every bit as much a feminist production as it is driven by testosterone demand..."any woman can" after all). It also bred a rather distressing amount of resentment among young men -- who now will argue that "she was really wanting to link up with all of us; she's a whore you know, not innocent at all, but you know how girls are -- they like it when it's happening and then they cry "rape" the next day because they don't want people to call them sluts).
We've come a long way baby, huh?
I think this is at the core of situations like this, and I'm afraid that we will see more, not less of this in the years to come.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 02:21 PM (5/yRG)
I don't know; I remember the same feeling of the Apocalypse back in the late '70's during the rash of serial killers: Son of Sam, the Night Stalker, Bundy, Wayne Williams, Gacy. Carter was president, the hostages were still in captivity, unemployment was sky-high, inflation, disco, drugs...it was a very weird time. A lot of cults sprang up around then, too: Hare Krishnas, the EST people, Moonies, that Jonestown Unification Church disaster, and so on.
I can even recall it now, and I was only 10 or 11 at the time. A lot of survivalists bought land in Wyoming back then and decamped for the mountains to wait out the coming upheaval -- nuclear war, societal breakdown, nobody really knew what.
Better days came along, though. They always do. You never appreciate the good times until you've been tested in the bad.
Posted by: Monty at October 29, 2009 02:21 PM (nTxjg)
64 Also, if you rape ...automatic castration.
And not chemically. I'd be all for castration with a rusty battle ax.
Or a plastic knife, like the kind you find at KFC
Or use this thing that doubleplusundead posted on his blog yesterday.
WARNING! WARNING! NSFW. NOT SAFE FOR YOUR SANITY TOO.
I hate the italics button btw.
Posted by: fozzy at October 29, 2009 02:21 PM (ccEuN)
I think she may be onto something.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:22 PM (GZnia)
Herr M, yes, but it used to be men were taught self control. That seems not to be in the lesson plan anymore. And in the Islamic world men just blame the women for their lack of self control.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:24 PM (GZnia)
I'm against hate crime laws, but if we're going to have them, why don't lefties consider all sexual assaults against women hate crimes? Is it because too many of their leaders and voting base are committing them?
Posted by: stace at October 29, 2009 02:24 PM (g/wgk)
Also, I think all who recorded or took pictures of this should at least be in jail and labeled as sex offenders/child pornographers.
I need to quit thinking of this, because my mind is conjuring all sorts of ugly and cruel scenarios that I believe should happen to all of these less-than-animal pieces of shit.
Posted by: Iamnotanalcoholic at October 29, 2009 02:25 PM (lUbPs)
I used to work at a ballet studio and we would get costume catalogs every so often. Paging through some of those catalogs for the younger set is appalling. The teen ones are pretty bad, but I couldn't believe how tarted out the little kids costumes were.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:26 PM (GZnia)
"On Twitter, Greg Pollowitz says "Death penalty for all of them, including the spectators." I agree. And I know there's no law to get to such just punishment, but then, as they say, no jury in the world would convict you."
If I was on the jury, I would. I could be just as convincing as Juror No. 8.
Posted by: SDH at October 29, 2009 02:26 PM (iwQEr)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 07:20 PM (qWLc4)
Very true. Here's a figure from 35,000 years ago. Archaeologists call it a 'fertility figurine' but any guy knows it's really a porn statue. Men have been objectifying women for a long time.
Posted by: Mætenloch at October 29, 2009 02:26 PM (z843g)
I know exactly what you're talking about, as my husband and I have had conversations going down that line a million times. Men are more vulnerable to visual stimulation. I get it.
What I'm referring to is more the sexualization of the extremely young. We're at a point where people are letting their elementary school girls wear makeup, belly shirts, crotch-cutting shorts, etc. What kind of chances are we giving our girls in life when we're telling them almost from the womb that they have to look and act like sluts to be cool?
Posted by: Mandy P. at October 29, 2009 02:26 PM (MK6Kx)
Yes, but the lesson plan says that if a boy notices a pretty girl, he is a rapist. If a girl pulls a six way train under the bleachers, she's not a slut, she was raped.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:27 PM (qWLc4)
Girls always gave it up -- the whole "virgin until marriage" thing was a polite and charming lie society used to tell itself.
The truism of the comment is that society required young people to at least go through the motions of courting, and dare I say, take the responsiblity of sexual reproduction, a bit more seriously than they do today. Young men and women were held to a higher level of responsible behavior as well -- the sexual revolution was only a revolution in being allowed to act childish imho.
There, I believe is the crux of the problem.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 02:27 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: whiskey at October 29, 2009 02:27 PM (L03mw)
Do I want to know what a 6 way train is?
unknown jane, what you said about the date rape stuff and "take back the night" was what I wanted to say but couldn't articulate. I completely agree with you.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:30 PM (GZnia)
We homeschool. All sorts of people look at us and give us the whining "What about socialization?!!!!1??" My answer is always "You mean like the socialization when I smoked my first joint behind the junior high, or the socialization where I got my first knobjob on the band bus?" Tends to shut them up.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:30 PM (qWLc4)
I taught junior college in Gary, Indiana. It was the black side of town, not quite ghetto but not far from it. Often when I was coming or going to or from a local store, I would open the door for a young black girl who was passing through. The first time, the girl said nothing but got kind of an attitude on her face and just walked through. Same for the second and third time.
It kinda pissed me off because even the trashiest white girl will thank you for opening a door for her, but I decided not to react but just study the situation. It kept happenning. I watched them closely and also watched them from a distance when walking through doors with other black people.
I came to the conclusion that the girls were surprised by having the door opened for them and didn't know what to do, so they defaulted to ghetto attitude and pushed on through. Nobody opened doors for them so they had never learned to say thank you. Nobody respected them enough to open a door for them.
Posted by: Tantor at October 29, 2009 02:30 PM (Ek/Oc)
Wherestherum,
Exactly. *shudder* Not suprisingly, at that studio, they were far more concerned with making money than in giving a crap about their students or teachers. They frequently pitted the teachers against the parents to avoid responsibility for management policies. If someone spoke up, they were fired or shunned or kept from taking the classes they wanted to take, etc. Glad I quit.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:31 PM (GF971)
I can still remember when the worst thing I worried about in junior high was being teased by boys, & that was 9 yrs ago.
Posted by: Miss'80sB at October 29, 2009 02:34 PM (zmiSr)
We're looking at home schooling when our kids are that age. I've got a 2 1/2 year-old boy and a baby girl due in February. I definitely don't want them taught the lessons kids are getting in school now. If only it wouldn't scar them for life to put them in chastity belts and chain them up in their rooms until they were 21.......
I keed, I keed!
Posted by: Mandy P. at October 29, 2009 02:34 PM (MK6Kx)
True, but as you go on to say, at least they went through the motions. The motions are now socially verboten.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:34 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Mandy P. at October 29, 2009 07:34 PM (MK6Kx)
We do K12. Love it. Google it and see if it's available in your state. It's still sucking off the taxpayer too, so there's that satisfaction as well.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:36 PM (qWLc4)
Whiskey, I've wondered about that, and I think it has a bit of a biological explanation.
No matter how much tripe is trotted out about "sensitive, caring men, blah, blah", women are hard wired to desire tough men (heh, just like men are hard wired to desire a "sweet rack"). Tough men went out and slayed the enemy tribe, killed the ravaging bear, brought down the big game, and also beat the crap out of any man in the tribe who tried to steal the best farm ground for himself. If you were hooked up to a tough and clever man, your children had a better chance of survival, and so did you.
So this Alan Alda gig that we've been trying to push on Western men has backfired on both ends: confused men who've forgotten how to be tough without being brutal (a good many of them, or at least a society that's sort of forgotten about tough, non-brutal men) but at the same time are hating the very constrained lot they've been dished out and equally confused women who don't know what they want (rude, gross chauvinist pig!...but for some reason he's soo much more exciting than Mr. Alan Alda...I don't know why...). This is a rather brief and attenuated description, but I think you get my point.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 02:36 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar at October 29, 2009 02:36 PM (XzzCe)
Thankfully my studio wasn't like that. They were ballet dancers so the costumes were limited anyway and only the upper level girls were even allowed to wear leotards in a color other than black.
I'm hard pressed to find anyone I know who doesn't enjoy rap or hiphop. I know there are some songs out there in those categories that talk about love (more in R&B, probably) but most of the songs I've heard just glorify thug life and slapping hos.
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 02:37 PM (GZnia)
Oh, oh, are the homeschoolers coming out of the closet?
(raises hand) That's me! (since fifth grade, when I came home from school with a mouth my parents were ashamed of (language, in case anyone wants to go anywhere else with that))
Also, unknown jane, I didn't give it up til my wedding night. I was 23. You can raise kids that way. I'm not mythical or a "charming lie", I swear.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:40 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Girl Thursday at October 29, 2009 02:40 PM (XzzCe)
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis."
Posted by: SDH at October 29, 2009 02:40 PM (iwQEr)
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 07:36 PM (5/yRG)
Authentic manhood has been under attack at least since I was born. I had 5 older brothers, an infantry Colonel as a father, and a mother who would blow your ass away without trepidation, though. I fully intend to raise my son to know how to skin deer and treat a woman with respect.
There's a lot more of us out there than "Sex in the City" would indicate. Cultural atavism doesn't die.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:40 PM (qWLc4)
That's hot. Really. Men should see that as hot, too. But that's not the direction the culture has gone.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:42 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: djarnold at October 29, 2009 02:42 PM (zTMpb)
I vaguely remembered the Kitty Genovese case from a college psych class, but I didn't know all the details. The raper/killer/necrophiliac had his original death sentence overturned to life in prison and periodically comes up for parole. He admitted to killing two other women, raping numerous others and burglarizing many homes. Why this douchebag is still alive is beyond me. I just found this on the Tru TV website:
Moseley realized he would become eligible for parole and he began a concentrated effort to gain release from prison. He read books from the prison library, and using taxpayer funds, was able to enroll in a college program. In the late 1970s, he became one of the first inmates in New York State to earn a college degree when he received a B.A. in Sociology from Niagara University. He wrote letters to newspapers and continued his campaign to obtain a parole.
During the period 1984 through 1995, Moseley appeared before the state parole board six times. His appearances were marked by his bizarre, self-serving comments to the panel, and he frequently assumed the role of societys victim. For a victim outside, its a one-time or one hour or one minute affair, but for the person whos caught, its forever, he said in 1984. People do kill people when they mug them sometimes, he added. At one parole hearing, Moseley claimed he had written a letter to the Genovese family to apologize for the inconvenience I caused. The Genovese family strongly denied receiving any such communication nor did they wish for one.
Unbelievable. I think I read somewhere else that he last came up for parole in 2006.
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 02:42 PM (qP2BK)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 02:43 PM (ObTcs)
Wherestherum,
I still cringe when I hear rap or hiphop, solely based on my experience with it at that studio. Even though the dancers were required to use the "Disney" versions of those songs.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:44 PM (GF971)
Birth-control pills pretty much killed off even the fiction of female chastity before marriage. When you divorce sex from the baby-making aspect, it becomes simply...recreation. So it's no surprise that people treat the whole thing rather cavalierly nowadays.
Women now seem to be going through a vogue where it's cool to be "polyamorous" or lesbian or bisexual. The act of coitus itself almost seems to be an afterthought: it seems to be more of a social phenomenon, a way of creating in-groups and out-groups. The long-term cultural impact of this kind of experimentation has yet to play itself out. No one seems to be giving much thought as to how all this freewheeling sex impacts the young 'uns: both as observers and participants.
Many girls seem to want children mostly as accessories, as living dolls they can dress up and push around in a pram and show off to their friends. The male is barely part of the equation: he's the sperm donor and financial support mechanism, but beyond that...his input doesn't seem to be particularly needed or wanted. And younger men seem to be fine with this -- it frees up a lot of time to play XBox.
When I was a wee lad, we had baseball as a way of socializing and figuring out the pecking-order. (Or, if you were a girl, softball. Because as everyone knows, girls can't play hardball.)
Posted by: Monty at October 29, 2009 02:44 PM (nTxjg)
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 02:44 PM (qP2BK)
Posted by: obama is a traitor at October 29, 2009 02:44 PM (Qt4Y7)
Posted by: Miss'80sB at October 29, 2009 07:34 PM (zmiSr)
Texas isn't Richmond, Ca. Not yet anyway. The larger cities are mostly there.
Posted by: Johnathan E. at October 29, 2009 02:44 PM (dQdrY)
Which makes crimes like this all the worse. These "men" have twisted their minds to the point that they can overcome millions of years of evolution.
Posted by: Flubber at October 29, 2009 02:45 PM (q5Xgs)
We are a society that can't summon the will to put a bullet in Khalid Sheik-Muhammad's head. Why does this surprise you?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:45 PM (qWLc4)
Herr Morgenholtz,
Thanks. My man thought so, too. ;-)
And, as far as is it's in my control, my sons will be brought up to respect women and my daughters to respect themselves. "Be the change you want to see in the world", right?
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:46 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Johnathan E. at October 29, 2009 02:47 PM (dQdrY)
Authentic manhood has been under attack at least since I was born.
Don't know when you were born, but it was already dead in my family in the 70's. I was raised by libtards who just couldn't understand why I kept getting into fights and got disruptive in class. I mean, they made sure I didn't have any acceptable outlets for aggression or energy, so what more could they do?
Fortunately, they missed the part about religion being the opiate of the masses, and my rampage was tempered somewhat by taking religion seriously. Then I got lucky and became clinically depressed at the onset of puberty. Probably the only reason I didn't get thrown in jail during my teens.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at October 29, 2009 02:50 PM (pZEar)
Posted by: Mætenloch at October 29, 2009 07:26 PM (z843g)
Heh! That's funny--all boobs and no brain (there's no head!)
Posted by: runningrn at October 29, 2009 02:50 PM (qP2BK)
I know so many girls who are like this. Many of them received little love as children & were sexually abused by a relative. They think that having a baby to love will help ease their hurt & pain, because babies love unconditionally.* But babies aren't toys, & they don't remain infants forever. Sounds obvious; but it isn't, really.
*I've actually had that said to me multiple times
Posted by: Miss'80sB at October 29, 2009 02:50 PM (zmiSr)
1970. But Blazer is still a hell of a lot older than me. I heard Alzheimer's left him for someone younger.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:51 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: garrett at October 29, 2009 02:53 PM (kiIqi)
MTV? co conspirators? So, let me get this straight, all the shit conservative have been saying for 40 years about shit music is true.
Damn, I am shocked. Wonder if the MSM will admit it?
Not a fucking chance.
In the boys defense, boys are treated like second class citizens by the school, so maybe they can go over the edge?
Nah, these fuckers are just thugs,
Jail baby.
They'll learn about rape soon enough.
Posted by: Kemp at October 29, 2009 02:54 PM (2+9Yx)
Garrett,
In cases like this, I agree totally. It's not about revenge. It's about making sure it never happens again.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:54 PM (GF971)
No child should have to suffer with a mother that stupid. The baby-daddy, of course, is no where to be found in such a situation.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 02:55 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 02:56 PM (ObTcs)
meh. Women who think babies love unconditionally never had one.
Babies take unconditionally, at least for the first couple years. My two year old is starting to give back, but not without a lot of investment first. And his daddy is around.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 02:58 PM (GF971)
Thank you for that. You are a light shining in the darkness. I hope my daughter and two sons will be as well.
Posted by: oLD gUY at October 29, 2009 02:59 PM (P/D33)
Posted by: M鎡enloch at October 29, 2009 07:26 PM (z843g)
--Back then, though, although men were chauvinistic and in many cases may have hated women on some level, a lot of it was probably out of envy for women's life-giving power, which was mytholigized and deified.
Much societal hatred for women now seeks to deny even the very concept of womenhood, of any "otherness" from men. Look at how motherhood is treated, and how having an unexpected pregnancy is a "punishment."
Posted by: logprof at October 29, 2009 03:00 PM (I3Udb)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:01 PM (GF971)
No. Shit. It's not up to kids to love unconditionally. That's the parents' job. Kids are selfish, manipulative (you ain't hit the fun part yet), and generally expensive pains in the ass. But you love them unconditionally, and you can't help it. It's great being a parent. Frustrating, keeps you broke, (I literally just got hit in the head with an empty Pixie Stix), but, it's worth it.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:02 PM (qWLc4)
You want to be the husband or the wife?
Er, I'll be the husband.
OK, come one up here and suck your wife's dick.
Jose, his first night in prison.
Posted by: Kemp at October 29, 2009 03:03 PM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Rosemarie at October 29, 2009 03:03 PM (4DmKS)
Posted by: Michael in MI at October 29, 2009 03:03 PM (ObTcs)
Posted by: Shannon at October 29, 2009 03:04 PM (niZOC)
Posted by: Shannon at October 29, 2009 08:04 PM (niZOC)
I never stopped. "Female" is used when I'm talking about farm animals. I prefer "ladies", when appropriate.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:06 PM (qWLc4)
Herr Morgenholz,
Clearly, you speak from experience. I mean, come on, would someone without kids be able to visualize the empty pixie stik? But, it made me laugh. And I totally agree. My two-year-old is manipulative.... with his dad. He's already figured out that I'm more stubborn than he is (what a battle that was!), but he loves me anyway. Though, as the oldest of eight, I know there will always be those hard stages. Was the pixie stik from trick-or-treating? I'm still staving off the seasonal sugar high with mine.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:06 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:09 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:10 PM (qWLc4)
I can understand the JO's that committed this crime...their thugsx10...
what freaks me out is all the people that stopped and watched it or took pictures of it and went home...sick, real sick. I think we look at real life as if it is a TV show, we're voyeurs with no responsibility?...or at least the young people in this crime did.
Posted by: ford at October 29, 2009 03:10 PM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:11 PM (GF971)
Not long ago I read an interview from a Detroit alternative newspaper. The interviewee was an old homeless guy who relayed the story of wandering into a deserted house and seeing a chick doing a dog while a dozen guys stood around and cheered. She got a rock of crack for putting on the show. The old hobo was distraught over it. And he was a professional street person.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:13 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 08:11 PM (GF971)
To a boy, all objects become weapons. That is highly relevant to this discussion.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:15 PM (qWLc4)
Yeah - we should totally wipe out Judeo-Christian values. It's all their fault. :sarcasm off:
Can anyone else see that the more those values are ridiculed and discarded, the worse our society gets? There's no firm definition of right and wrong. People can't tell the difference. There's no accountabililty.
Don't post the Ten Commandments because they're religious. Forget that they speak to every decency a civilized society should have. And everything Jesus taught was about how to respect the lives of others and therefore save yourselves.
Look at everything BUT THAT as guidance. And so we end up with total shit in the Whitehouse and our govt. and our hard-won country and freedoms being sold for lies.
Posted by: Dianne at October 29, 2009 03:15 PM (FcncT)
Herr Morgenholz,
I agree about all things being weapons. But even my boy knows not to use them to aim at me, his sister, or his aunts or grandparents. But I had to teach him that. No one is teaching either these thug kids or the equally culpable by-standers. As an interesting side note, anyone who actually cheered, at least in this state, would be legally liable for the crime itself.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:18 PM (GF971)
You can't knock down a house without destroying its foundation.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:19 PM (qWLc4)
Duh Boy has a couple of toy guns. We're a gun owning family. If he aims them at someone, I snatch it out of his hand and smack him in the head with it. He's learning. Gun safety begins at birth in this family.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:21 PM (qWLc4)
As horrible as this is, this wouln't have been anything other than local news 20 years ago. Even if it was national news, what, a mention on the 5'o'clock news? An article in the paper. It's a different world alright. We hear about every bad thing that happens anywhere.
And prison rape blows. Who gets rewarded by turning a blind eye to prison rape? Rapists do! Do you really trust rapists to be just in their raping? Absolutely punish the hell out of these assholes. But leaving that punishment up to their fellow rapists is not an acceptable solution.
Posted by: seattle slough at October 29, 2009 03:22 PM (JRGA6)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:24 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:25 PM (qWLc4)
Come on, how else you gonna get to be a partial owner of an NFL team.
Posted by: Dr. Do-it-yourself at October 29, 2009 03:25 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:26 PM (qWLc4)
<i>The problem isn't that we're raising boys who don't respect girls.</i>
I don't anyone raised these boys, period.
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at October 29, 2009 03:27 PM (uw+0A)
Herr Morgenholz,
That's probably the homeschooler coming out in them. ;-) I worked at a living history museum for six summers and we could always recognize the homeschoolers. They were the polite, well-spoken, well-educated, obedient, curious, intelligent, didn't jump on the historical furniture types. And that speaks well of *both* parents. It would be a funny old world if we were all exactly like our mothers.
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:30 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:35 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 03:37 PM (qWLc4)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:40 PM (GF971)
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 03:41 PM (GF971)
the spectators are even a more disturbing aspect. as to this case being a young girl, we saw from the case yesterday torture suffering and rape were perpetuated on both a male and female.
while the tool might be sex in both cases, i don't believe it's only about sexualizing, it's more about causing suffering and pain to another male or female,
the youth , do many of them seem empty, and i disagree they have no regard for anything, they do for their chosen peers, they'd likely shoot anyone that perpetuated this on one of their chosen groups member, they have become like packs of ravening dogs.
all the onlooking should be jailed . all the torturers should never be out in society again. 23 hours of lock up a day? i see no reason for any break at all except to eat, use the restroom.
they not only destroy that victim, they destroy our societies.
Posted by: ugh-willow at October 29, 2009 03:41 PM (1kwr2)
148 -- I was not making a statement in regards to individuals; if a person waits until marriage, great. It just hasn't been as much a sure thing as many have been led to believe that it was -- premarital sex is not a new invention; what has changed is how it has been viewed (to some extent). I really think the over mythologization of this is part of the problem (a problem our grand or great grandparents weren't as subjected to thanks to media not being as prevalent back then, that, and they tended to marry earlier which also cut down considerably on the problem I think).
On one hand, we have people preaching (yes preaching) "wait until your married" as some shining moral ideal from some golden age (that never existed) and not taking it from a pragmatic stance; on the other, we have children who are being, let's be blunt, turned into pornographic subjects (due to some other, conflicting ideal or so it seems). There is no happy, pragmatic middle in the way we approach sexuality, and we pay for it.
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 03:44 PM (5/yRG)
The Knoxville case was not prosecuted as a hate crime for obvious (to liberals) reasons. However, I'm confident that justice will be carried out regardless, as it was in the Shephard and Byrd cases.
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at October 29, 2009 03:45 PM (uw+0A)
Posted by: Dr. Do-it-yourself at October 29, 2009 03:45 PM (DIYmd)
Posted by: MPFS Indentured Fish Stick to the State at October 29, 2009 03:47 PM (PBGAP)
"Oh, yeah, I love kids! Aren't they great? They're such--GODDAMMIT WILL YOU SHUT THE HELL UP FOR TWO SECONDS! I'M ON THE PHONE! KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF BEFORE I COME IN THERE AND WHALE THE CRAP OUT OF YOU! Anway, what was I saying? Yeah, kids, they're a treasure."
Posted by: Monty at October 29, 2009 03:52 PM (nTxjg)
You might be gone by now, Herr - but I'm glad to see that you are raising your children to be good and proper people. You deserve accolades for being the thoughtful and responsible parent that you are. Well done, sir.
Posted by: garrett at October 29, 2009 03:55 PM (kiIqi)
Posted by: unknown jane at October 29, 2009 04:01 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Oprah at October 29, 2009 04:02 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: RJ at October 29, 2009 04:03 PM (ADbI4)
Posted by: wherestherum at October 29, 2009 04:04 PM (GZnia)
We're raising a large number of children who are all of the following:
1. desensitized to violence
2. abused / uncared for by the dominant adults in their lives
3. bombarded with sexual and violent images from the cradle
4. repeatedly told that their value rests in their attractiveness
5. taught that belief in God is hokey, phony, hypocritical, evil, etc.
6. taught that women are nothing but hos and bitches
7. taught that killing a baby is just a lifestyle choice
8. pumped full of various prescription (and illegal) drugs
9. taught that their net value to society is ZERO
It's very simple. Some people/organizations are TOO BIG TOO FAIL (see AIG, the federal government, celebrities, politicians, liberal elites, etc.).
THE REST OF US ARE TOO SMALL TO MATTER.
That poor, drunken girl was too f**king small to matter.
To anyone.
Posted by: stickety at October 29, 2009 04:05 PM (Jg5C9)
Posted by: Dr. Phil at October 29, 2009 04:10 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: Jeopardy Contestant at October 29, 2009 04:12 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 07:45 PM (qWLc4)
Fuck the bullet, we can't even pour some water down his throat without some asshole bitching.
Posted by: Johnny at October 29, 2009 04:12 PM (xVKXy)
Posted by: torabora at October 29, 2009 04:14 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: torabora at October 29, 2009 04:17 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: Gimp at October 29, 2009 04:20 PM (H1b4W)
Posted by: Gimp at October 29, 2009 04:21 PM (H1b4W)
Maybe, if we're lucky, there won't be another "hate crime" law based on this incident. But frankly, I expect one sometime before the mid terms - it will make great copy. One things for sure, based on something that's less than a 1 in 100,000 likelyhood, every frikken parent in this country with a girl child will be standing outside every frikken dance they go to because people are too damn ignorant of how the media microscope works and what real likelyhoods mean.
Posted by: K at October 29, 2009 04:27 PM (0byh7)
K,
Do you have kids? Would you just shrug it off if you found out your daughter was raped in public for two hours to an audience who approved? Sure, they're all isolated incidents... until it's your kid. Some of us would like to make sure it doesn't happen to ours. That's why we discuss solutions. If you're not contributing to the discussion, why are you bothering to pontificate to us?
Posted by: Mouse at October 29, 2009 04:36 PM (GF971)
"They did not respect humans, period."
exactly.
since these paticular individuals don't respect humans, should humans respect them?
reap what you sow?
eye for an eye?
i feeling pretty "eye for an eye"
Posted by: shoey at October 29, 2009 04:43 PM (RxUMK)
I'd blow their heads off with a shotgun and take my chances with twelve. I'm sick of these violent sociopaths pulling this shit and getting away with it.
Posted by: MPFS Indentured Fish Stick to the State at October 29, 2009 04:44 PM (PBGAP)
Posted by: RJ at October 29, 2009 09:03 PM (ADbI4)
Yeah, this blog is so politically correct.
If you don't like it here then fuck off. Go start a blog called dipshit.com. See how long it takes you to attract as many readers as our mighty Ewok leader.
Whiny bitch.
Posted by: fozzy at October 29, 2009 04:50 PM (ccEuN)
Where's that useless Kenyan on this??? The SOB has an opinion on everything else under the sun.
The TOTUS had a whole diatribe composed for him, but then he found out that the young girl wasn't a Mengelian infanticist like George Tiller. So Barry ate a waffle and took a nap instead.
Posted by: VJay at October 29, 2009 04:57 PM (k87Wm)
Posted by: BarbaraS at October 29, 2009 05:01 PM (tWYP4)
Posted by: K at October 29, 2009 09:27 PM (0byh7)
I'm pickin' up what you're layin' down. And there's no question that our 24 hour media has turned these hiccups in society into some type of porn.
At the same time, I can't help but notice that the race to the bottom is so outside most people's experience that note is being taken. I come from Viking stock. Fact is, gang rape is not a Viking thing at all, despite what you read. Farming is, if you read history. But you screw just one nun....... But that's not what we're talking about.
This act was a total repudiation of society and the cultural more. Cultures are repudiated all the time. But in mass? People are grasping for an explanation of why we are turning on our own culture.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 29, 2009 05:05 PM (qWLc4)
"Three minors — 15, 16 and 17 — are each charged with felony rape with a foreign object"
WTF? Is this pro-wrestling? Was Mr. Fuji standing in the shadows?
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 29, 2009 05:12 PM (vupGF)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 29, 2009 05:27 PM (vupGF)
@170: "Jail baby. They'll learn about rape soon enough."
Um, I'm guessing you never saw the special about Richard Speck then? Maybe they'll have a hard time of it, but I'd wager not. They might spend their sentences partying balls like Speck did, or maybe they'll become predators in the jail, too.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 29, 2009 05:41 PM (vupGF)
#236
If these are hispanics raping a black girl, they are dead meat.
If they raped another hispanic, they a someones whore or dead.
Posted by: Kemp at October 29, 2009 05:53 PM (2+9Yx)
Not a week goes by in Richmond that there isn't a driveby shooting, murder, execution-style slaying, gangbanging, mugging, beating, or major drug bust in Richmond. The place is a cesspool. Any one with half a brain avoids the place. I used to go to appointments in Richmond for work... my companion of choice was my Glock 9mm. The only way this will ever change is when, and if, the people who live there rise up and say "enough" 'cause it's usually one of their own that pays the price for the gangsta culture.
Posted by: Kalifornia Kafir at October 29, 2009 05:54 PM (h+Y7i)
"And I know there's no law to get to such just punishment"
But yes, there is.
So, three dusty travelers were wandering down the road to Gamora (sp?).
Yeah, sounds like a road show song... On the road to Gamora...
Anybody got a quick reference to Lot and the blast of a party at Gamora? It's a rockin' story.
I've been watching this closely and trying so very hard not to take judgment into my own hands.
Posted by: MostlyHarmless at October 29, 2009 05:54 PM (OXJEZ)
No. Under our legal system, wrong can be punished but right cannot be required. So, these creeps are as innocent as newborn lambs, in the eyes of the law.
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at October 29, 2009 06:07 PM (61tK5)
Posted by: human dignity at October 29, 2009 06:25 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Scrapiron at October 29, 2009 06:32 PM (1kwr2)
Namely, that it will never happen. Charles Bronson, Liam What'sHisFace, SamJacksonInThatLawyerMovie. Never happens in real life. And when we indulge in it, like masturbation, it lets off steam. To no effect.
It'd be great if every time we read a story like this, there was an ever greater pushback against soft sentencing, absent fathers, and the generally fucked up societal mores of the day.
Yes, as men (or as a parent more generally), we're charged with protecting ours but we can only do that to a certain degree. Once they leave our sight, it becomes ever less sound. As a society, we have to start focusing on changing laws and changing the culture.
Charles Bronson won't do shit for you. Voting for open carry, putting cops on the streets and taking over school boards might.
Posted by: basic, before visual at October 29, 2009 07:08 PM (SL3qo)
CNN and MSNBC may be shocked by this kind of behavior, but I can't imagine the producers of The History Channel's Gangland are surprised.
Posted by: Mike Z. at October 29, 2009 07:35 PM (xTzeW)
Posted by: xlzhengnan at October 29, 2009 08:00 PM (Mj2H/)
Posted by: Doug at October 29, 2009 08:56 PM (Pxgwq)
what freaks me out is all the people that stopped and watched it or took pictures of it and went home...sick, real sick
I know how to deal with these swine...
Posted by: Vlad Tepesh at October 29, 2009 09:02 PM (AcPH9)
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at October 29, 2009 11:07 PM (61tK5)
The girl was fifteen. Seems like they could at least make the cretins with cameras life miserable under child pornography laws.
Posted by: Johnathan E. at October 29, 2009 10:01 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: PDizzle at October 29, 2009 10:03 PM (R0lVr)
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 30, 2009 12:33 AM (GY/ii)
are people not willing to stop such barbaric actions because they don't want to be viewed as "racist"? Is this a consequence of PC culture and multiculturalism and moral relativism?
Yes, Yes, Yes and Yes. Thank you, liberal Demunists.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at October 30, 2009 02:18 AM (IPGTN)
In the prior thread while someone was trying to make this about race, I was thinking the whole time "How many of the involved (rapists and casual watchers) came from two parent homes?
Mom love is "You're so wonderful. I'll love you no matter what!"
Dad love is "You better get your shit straight or I'll kick your ass!"
I'm a mom -I bite my tongue sometimes when I think my husband is being too tough on our kids. I keep meeting the teenagers raised with only mom-love, and I do not want my kids to be remotely like them. They seem to have no clue that other human beings exist for reasons other than serving them. They are selfish to the point of autism.
Every human being seems to need both kinds of parenting; too many kids right now seem to be damaged by having approval without standards or consequences.
Not a knock on those who have lost the other parent through no fault of their own. Just an observation - particularly of those who have one kid after another without ever having had the intention of a two-parent home anywhere along the way. Also, obviously, not a statement that single-parenting leads invariably to felonies. Just an observation, that the concern for others that Ace mentions seems to be lacking to some degree in the kids with no Dad figure in their lives.
Posted by: Jade Sea at October 30, 2009 04:12 AM (f2QL0)
Posted by: Booter at October 30, 2009 05:15 AM (eimUK)
253 -- Yes, and no. I've known single moms who were successful at raising their kids (it was hard, and they probably would have been more successful if there had been another parent in the picture). I've seen two parent homes that did an awful job.
The big factor -- at least what I've seen -- is this: the homes that were successful at raising kids were homes where the parent(s) were respectful of society's rules and laws for the most part, and had a very defintite set of rules in the home that were consistently enforced. The homes in question also valued education and/or some sort of gainful work responsiblity (the kids had chores they were expected to do and they were expected to at least do passably well at school). It was easier for the families with two parents due to sharing of the burden of parenting, but I have found that single parents who followed this were more successful than a two parent family that didn't follow this, or even a two parent family in which one parent would not (this was actually the worst situation, from my observations).
From my experience, these other factors also counted: the successful single mothers weren't necessarily against having a two parent household, rather they would have preferred it, but let's face it -- it's often hard for a single mom to find a new, suitable husband; they were also homes in which the single mom displayed a strong work ethic and set of moral rules (not always Christian, but still a set of rules which coincided with a civil society) -- aka. not your stereotypical welfare/crack whore single moms, nor even moms who considered it society's responsiblity to take care of them (many did have to draw welfare, but it was not considered an ideal state of existence -- something to try and get off of...they wanted to maintain their parental autonomy in their households and viewed the social workers as chipping away at that, which to some extent I believe they did).
Posted by: unknown jane at October 30, 2009 06:40 AM (5/yRG)
It's not that they don't respect women, they hate women. That's the whole key to Hip Hop.
Posted by: nina at October 30, 2009 08:08 AM (IZlTn)
Posted by: ttrtrtrert at November 06, 2009 12:36 AM (wYEI1)
Posted by: herman198 at March 10, 2011 01:10 AM (tnRWG)
Posted by: herman198 at March 14, 2011 09:20 PM (jkYgz)
Posted by: ipod to mac at April 14, 2011 07:15 AM (ecKmC)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









