September 11, 2008
— Ace I'll quote some in a bit, just reading it now...
Palin defended a previous statement in which she reportedly characterized the war in Iraq as "task from God".Gibson quoted her as saying: "Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God."
But Palin said she was referencing a famous quote by Abraham Lincoln.
"I would never presume to know God's will or to speak God's words. But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that's a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God's side."
Incidentally, that's not spin, that's exactly what she said. The AP Dowdified her quote to take away the part about praying that we are on God's side to make it sound like she was simply saying "We're on God's side."
GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, "Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God."PALIN: You know, I don't know if that was my exact quote.
GIBSON: Exact words.
PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words when he said -- first, he suggested never presume to know what God's will is, and I would never presume to know God's will or to speak God's words.
Not exact words, Gibson. She said (paraphrase) "Let us pray that our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God." The AP cut off the beginning off that, and of course all the idiots in the MSM repeat it.
And then Gibson says, "Exact words."
Hot Air is on this of course. Here's AllahPundit on it, back when the AP began Dowdifying the quote:
" Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God, she exhorted the congregants. Thats what we have to make sure that were praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is Gods plan.Heres what the AP turns it into:
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told ministry students at her former church that the United States sent troops to fight in the Iraq war on a task that is from God.Our national leaders are sending them out on a task that is from God, she said. Thats what we have to make sure that were praying for, that there is a plan and that plan is Gods plan.
Contact ABCNews immediately to demand a correction. This isn't an arguable mistake; it's a complete, provable mistake. And Gibson doubles down on "exact words."
Sorry, Gibson-- exact words means exact words. And if you're going to edit out key words and transform a statement from one meaning to another, that's not even close to "exact."
Greg Gutfied on Why They Hate Her: It's funny because it's true. [CJ]
Write Charlie Gibson: Ask him what "exact words" means, especially when the words are deliberately Dowdified in order to make Sarah Palin's explanation implausible.
With the censored words included, her explanation makes perfect sense-- in fact, it's pretty inarguable.
So ask them if "exact words" now means something else in the ABCNews stylebook.
Posted by: Ace at
12:44 PM
| Comments (218)
Post contains 600 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: jawbone at September 11, 2008 12:45 PM (JalPh)
Does that mean 6:30 Eastern time, or 6:30 whatever your local time zone is?
Posted by: dan-O at September 11, 2008 12:45 PM (teb/C)
He's trying to nail her on the "our leaders are sending them on a task that is from God" comment.
C'mon Charlie, the full quote was "Pray that our leaders are sending them on a task that is from God." Don't give me that "exact words" bullshit.
Posted by: Average Jen at September 11, 2008 12:45 PM (OINAg)
Posted by: DrewM. at September 11, 2008 12:51 PM (hlYel)
Obama's answer to that same question?
Obama: "Uh-uh-eh It is not something uh from my Muslim faith."
Gibson: "You mean, your Christian faith."
Posted by: oy at September 11, 2008 12:55 PM (KAuuY)
Posted by: Maetenloch at September 11, 2008 12:56 PM (hn7Rm)
The banner headline at ABC New's site is: GOV. SARAH PALIN WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF RUSSIA INVADES ANOTHER COUNTRY
Of course that appears to be predicated on this Q and A:
The Governor advocated the accession of Georgia and Ukraine into NATO.
When asked by Gibson if under the NATO treaty, the U.S. would have to
go to war if Russia again invaded Georgia, Palin responded: "Perhaps
so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if
another country is attacked, you're going to be expected to be called
upon and help.
So if a country becomes part of NATO and is then invaded we would be obligated to go to war? Wow this is breaking news stuff. I mean Article V of the NATO Treaty will only be 60 years old next year. Who knew this stuff?
Look at the hick Governor making shit up and getting us into a war!Posted by: DrewM. at September 11, 2008 01:01 PM (hlYel)
Um, sorry to have to break it to you and the Morons, but Barack Hussein Obama II is going to be the next POTUS.
No doubt.
Not even close.
William Jefferson Clinton today has called the race.
'Nuff said.
And no, I am not kidding.
The power of the MSM, Soros, the Left-Green-Pink-Blue-Brown and Islamist Axis is too strong to overcome.
Having said that, what is important now is to begin planning on what you are going to do come January 2009.
Higher taxes.
Less security.
Fairness Doctrine.
Just to name a few.
But to repeat, Barack Hussein Obama II is going to win the presidential election in November.
Word.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:06 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: DCox at September 11, 2008 01:08 PM (2pT9a)
Well, I, for one, plan on getting stone drunk. Of course I was planning that anyway but now I'll have an excuse.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 11, 2008 01:10 PM (ZHqJf)
Posted by: whatthecrap? at September 11, 2008 01:11 PM (OW1jF)
Posted by: dan-O at September 11, 2008 01:12 PM (teb/C)
Sharkman's News Service Headline for 09/11/08
"Barack Obama today said: 'I suck cocks in hell.' Film wish, at 11:00!"
Actual Quote from Mr. Obama: "I really don't think, ahh, that, uhhh, you can really judge my campaign by, mmmmmm, how much money it sucks out of democratic donors. I mean, y'know, ahhh, if, for instance, yrrrm, if you cock a pistol at the country, in the form of eight years of George Bush's, oooo, hellish policies, then, y'oh, ya, ummm, gotta get some money, n'stuff, from donors to help you, aaaaaaaaaahh, overturn that nightmare!"
Signing off from Washington . . . Courage, people.
Posted by: Sharkman at September 11, 2008 01:16 PM (UioS4)
Posted by: BabaChewy at September 11, 2008 01:18 PM (UUwxQ)
Dude, pour yourself a nice cup of STFU. Doom prophecies are a dime a dozen here. We don't need a discount AP.
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 01:18 PM (qxc7J)
Posted by: Bugler at September 11, 2008 01:18 PM (YCVBL)
Posted by: mrkwong at September 11, 2008 01:19 PM (G8Eo0)
Posted by: aubrey at September 11, 2008 01:20 PM (q/Z0+)
Posted by: george fromer at September 11, 2008 01:21 PM (MobLv)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at September 11, 2008 01:22 PM (ltwze)
The ABC article veers into the talking points which it wants Palin to "answer". By that, it means "react defensively to this bullshit that we need to keep repeating, day after day, until 2024 if need be, or until longer if she turns this country over to the rethuglifascists... TRUTH TO POWER!!!".
Posted by: David Ross at September 11, 2008 01:22 PM (08cTp)
Posted by: joeindc44 at September 11, 2008 01:22 PM (QxSug)
Right back at ya'.
It is not a doom prophecy.
Unless there is a MAJOR meltdown by Barack Hussein Obama II the system force and its resources that are The Believers and their benefactors, cannot be overcome.
Its a systems problem.
Not a prophecy.
As they say, do the math.
Yes, things are looking good for John Sidney McCainn III, but it won't last.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:23 PM (O0Kyl)
Is that your version of "google it"?
"Yes, things are looking good for John Sidney McCainn III, but it won't last."
No, no doom prophecy there...
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 01:26 PM (qxc7J)
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 01:26 PM (mTWN+)
Posted by: Jajos, FL at September 11, 2008 01:27 PM (9v34C)
Posted by: aubrey at September 11, 2008 01:29 PM (q/Z0+)
Contact ABCNews immediately to demand a correction. This isn't an arguable mistake; it's a complete, provable mistake. And Gibson doubles down on "exact words."
C'mon Ace, you're kidding, right? These cocksuckers don't apologize and don't correct. Unless it's something stupid like using who for whom.
Posted by: redriverted at September 11, 2008 01:29 PM (Z7fcC)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 01:30 PM (briex)
Gibson has done the equivelent of pulling the quote "The Boogeyman is real" out of the statement "I don't think the Boogeyman is real."
Also, do contact ABC news: http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346
Or look up the phone number for your local ABC station.
Posted by: Guest at September 11, 2008 01:31 PM (X8Omj)
Posted by: Hotspur at September 11, 2008 01:33 PM (c158/)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 01:35 PM (briex)
Sorry to break it to you, but I am an O.M.
Original Moron.
And JB,
Do you really think that the MSM, Soros, st al are going to just quit when they see McCain in the lead?
You (and I) haven't even begun to see the wall-to-wall campaigning that the Media and their minions will perform on behalf of The One.
The savage, disgusting, unrelenting, and unprecedented attacks against Sarah Louise Heath Palin are only going to get worse.
And now, at long last, William Jefferson Clinton is going to campaign for BHO.
The "magic" will suddenly return to the Obama campaign, followed shortly thereafter by Herself Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton.
Pennsylvania, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Colorado, Florida, new Hampshire, will all go BLUE with the Clintons behind Obama.
Like I said, do the math.
Just sayin', again.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:36 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 01:37 PM (mTWN+)
MeTooThen, we've seen your routine here and at JOM before. I wish you would make an argument instead of just sayin'.
Posted by: michaelt at September 11, 2008 01:38 PM (x4LR9)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 01:39 PM (briex)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:40 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 01:43 PM (mTWN+)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 01:44 PM (briex)
Whatever dude.
William Jefferson Clinton appeals to the Independents in this country, small town, Blue Dog Dems, women, and even Reagan Democrats.
Hey, you don't believe me.
Fine.
Like I said, unless Obama makes some HUGE, outlier gaffe, or there is some enormous, heretofore scandal, I can't see McCain winning with the blessing of the Clintons behind Obama.
Just remember, Kool Aid comes in two flavors, Blue and Red.
Beware and be wary.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:44 PM (O0Kyl)
I just watched it and the editing was very poor. I think they shortened a lot of her answers.
I hope the campaign insisted on videotaping the interview themselves because something didn't seem right.
Posted by: SamIam at September 11, 2008 01:44 PM (eXAlO)
However (I guess I missed Allah's story) I was shocked when I just saw the real transcript. That is nothing like the story, or the question as it was asked.
From a religious upbringing (and a religious upbringing in Alaska, none-the-less) I am very familiar with that type of prayer. It's not claim of any kind, or an endorsement. It was standard stuff (every week) for the pastor to pray for wisdom and guidance for the leaders of the country. It's an act of humility to a greater power, not an act of ego.
I am embarrassed that I ever bought the story, and I am appalled that ABC ran with it.
Posted by: erik at September 11, 2008 01:45 PM (hblvb)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:46 PM (O0Kyl)
I'd like to see more articles trying to explain the anti-palin psychosis going on.
Posted by: Village Idiot at September 11, 2008 01:46 PM (Kwk7J)
Oh, brother, another troll, moby, or whatever here?...
These same entities battled heavily for a certain candidate in 2000, and for another in 2004 - and they lost both times. The American people hates being lectured by the elites, n 1968 and in 1972, in 1980 and in 1984... The media went wild FOR the Democrat, but the American people knew better - and there was no web media then...
Posted by: oy at September 11, 2008 01:48 PM (KAuuY)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:48 PM (O0Kyl)
Hats off to Charlie Gibson otherwise, in the first segment I just watched he asked some tough, fair questions but didn't play gotcha games.
Sarah, of course, comes across very well.
More, on Iraq, later in the broadcast....
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at September 11, 2008 01:48 PM (4ZOxD)
"Just sayin'" is a shorthand for "I'm talking scary out of my ass."
You're the Obama of Trolls. All sizzle, no steak.
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 01:50 PM (qxc7J)
Posted by: RajivVindaloo at September 11, 2008 01:50 PM (Rn2+D)
Shit, I bet Obama went white with fear when he heard that the Clintons were behind him.
And would this all-powerful, super-duper campaigner Bill Clinton be the same one who couldn't get his wife enough votes in her own party to be the nominee?
Scary.........
Posted by: wiserbud at September 11, 2008 01:50 PM (JF9u1)
Posted by: Jim62sch at September 11, 2008 01:51 PM (ubHgw)
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 01:51 PM (qxc7J)
So, like, using the candidates' full names does what for your point, exactly?
Well MeTooThen did use the dreaded McCain middle name. <shudder>
And he writes in single sentence paragraphs.
So you know he's wise and sincere and all.
But what he really needs to do is Start Capitalizing All His Words So They'll Sound More Portentous.
Then He Can Compete With Didderot's Dog.
Posted by: Maetenloch at September 11, 2008 01:51 PM (hn7Rm)
Billy Jeff is campaigning for the One. Heh.
That's rich. Bill Jeff campaigns for no one except himself.
Posted by: SlaveDog at September 11, 2008 01:52 PM (H6Jyg)
"LIKE I SAID, FOUR MORE YEARS OF BUSH WOULD BE VASTLY PREFERABLE"
Posted by: Topsecretk9 at September 11, 2008 01:52 PM (IluD0)
Didn't WJC say Obama couldn't win a few months back? I did like the absence of Ums, Uhs and wait a seconds that Obama uses. Just wait for the nut-roots to scream that the questions were rigged and she had them in advance.
Posted by: cv at September 11, 2008 01:52 PM (GmamD)
Dude, I'm on your side.
Just don't drink the Kool Aid.
That's all I'm sayin.
Yes, get out the vote.
Try like hell to elect McCain (he was not my first pick, not even my second.)
Give him your full support.
But do not underestimate the power of the system that is behind Obama. It is colossal and it will stop at nothing to get him elected.
Here, imagine what it will be like on November 5, 2008 after Obama is elected. Do you think that all of the BusHitler, McCheney Satan, Palin Psychosis is suddenly going to go away, not that the Dems have won?
On the contrary, get ready for the reeducation camps (figuratively) and possibly war-crime tribunals (literally.)
The Republicans have had a great week.
No doubt.
But it's only going to get tougher from here on out and I don't think the Republicans can win.
Plan accordingly.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:53 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 01:54 PM (briex)
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 01:54 PM (qxc7J)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at September 11, 2008 01:58 PM (z6fKT)
No, Bill could not overcome the Obama machine.
But together, they can overcome McCain.
It's not that hard a formulation.
And yes, I like using the candidates full names.
John Forbes Kerry was never a man of the people.
Nor was Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.
As for short sentences, you write the way you want.
I'll write the way I want.
If you don't like it.
That's your problem.
...
What's interesting to me is that immediate and intense negative comments that McCain might lose.
Morons, half of this blog wasn't behind him one month ago.
If you want to become a Believer, that's also your problem.
It's not the high that's the problem, it's the come down that's a bitch.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 01:59 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at September 11, 2008 02:00 PM (ZTDVK)
Umm...ok. For the first time in modern US history, the "power" of "the system" is "behind" a Democrat. It is a wonder a Republican has won the WH at all.
"But it's only going to get tougher from here on out and I don't think the Republicans can win. " There, fixed it for you.
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 02:00 PM (qxc7J)
Posted by: Jim62sch at September 11, 2008 02:00 PM (ubHgw)
Perhaps, but these groups you just mentioned are also well aware that Clinton is not the candidate. After seeing all of Obama's unforced errors that expose his true beliefs, as well as the continuing realization that he is such an empty suit that actual empty suits seem more qualified and intelligent, Clinton's supposed appeal to these groups ain't gonna mean much at all.
Combine that with the Clinton's desire to see Obama lose, paving the way for Hillary 2012! that no one, and I mean NO ONE, with even half a fucking brain believes that they are actually gonna campaign real hard at all. In fact, I'm sure that Bill's racist gaffes and explosions of anger during his wife's run are gonna look normal compared to what we get if he goes stumping for Obama.
Posted by: wiserbud at September 11, 2008 02:01 PM (JF9u1)
Posted by: Wilhelm Klink at September 11, 2008 02:01 PM (GGhvX)
The second segment was much better. They had a video of her speaking in church, and it gave the full context of her words, which she clarified for Gibson. She is much better when she talks about subjects close to her heart.
Posted by: lmg at September 11, 2008 02:02 PM (A/vgC)
Posted by: aubrey at September 11, 2008 02:02 PM (q/Z0+)
It sounded a whole lot worse on paper. Gibson looked like a senseless dunderpate and kept digging to no avail.
I think her comments about her son were another dig at Obama and his community organizing. Let's see if he squawks.
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at September 11, 2008 02:02 PM (4ZOxD)
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 02:02 PM (qxc7J)
We shall make it so.
Kool-Aid is yummy.
Posted by: MeTooConvinced at September 11, 2008 02:03 PM (zAvxs)
We are not going to win.
The wrath of William Jefferson Clinton is upon us.
He gets a lot of ass.
Don't you know what that means?
It means he's crazy attractive to independents and Womyn.
It's all over except for the pillow talk.
I'm one of you and I only drink Gatorade--Fruit Punch.
I'm constipated. Andrew Sullivan impacted my loins.
Just dreamin'
Posted by: LifeLongRepublican at September 11, 2008 02:03 PM (qAMnO)
I'm happy that I don't have to tremble in fear of the Clintons' supposed voter magnetism as you seem to. Anyone with a pulse is going to see any effort by Uh-bama to draft Bill & Hill into campaigning for him for what it is -- desperation.
Do you really think they are going to put any serious effort into campaigning for the man who slapped them in the face by not even vetting her for VP and hence has blocked them from returning to the White House?
I saw some tape of Hillary "stumping" for The One yesterday... she sounded downright robotic. No passion, no energy, she just read the words like she was reading stock quotes.
Sorry, your fearmongering isn't having any effect. I don't have blinders on about this election, but I do have faith.
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 02:03 PM (mTWN+)
Fuck you too.
Really.
McCain is not Reagan.
Sorry to let you in on the news.
The hyperpartisanship of the MSM and the billions behind Obama are unique to this election.
You're not the one thinking.
But that's OK. Enjoy the Kool Aid.
And IreneFingIrene,
I'm already man enough.
And fuck you, too.
Really.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:04 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Bart at September 11, 2008 02:05 PM (4W3RG)
My wife, a big Charlie fan from GMA days, was pretty pissed at him. She's seen him do interviews of people he liked and thought that was the way he always was. This was an eye-opener for her. And I bet a lot of other women.
End result - Palin didn't do any harm to her image or the ticket.
Posted by: TRO at September 11, 2008 02:07 PM (q4WFG)
It's been a good couple of weeks and the trends are looking better every day.
Seriously, MeTooThen, I guess it's okay to worry a little bit about the little day to day events but damn, to go insane with pessimism like you did here because the almighty Bill Clinton is going to {gasp!} campaign for the Democratic nominee (Who woulda think it??!?!?) shows a serious lack of testicular fortutude.
Damn, man, how about we let the candidates debate before we start planning for the coming OMG!!1!1!1 DEmOcrRATiC lANdsLIdE!!1!!!1 you are so getting so worked up over.
Posted by: wiserbud at September 11, 2008 02:09 PM (JF9u1)
My mother-in-law had a similar reaction after seeing the interview.
She said, "What is he, a Democrat or something?"
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 02:09 PM (mTWN+)
Just before I flipped the channel, Susan Sarandon said "Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a governor. Thats all I have to say."
So when was Jesus a community organizer? Was this after he braided a whip and beat the money lenders? I remember him being our Lord and Savior and a carpenter, must have missed that community organizer part.
Posted by: POTL at September 11, 2008 02:10 PM (mD4t/)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at September 11, 2008 02:13 PM (JsY4F)
get it.
it's over.
obama has the clintons on his.
side.
the same ones that couldn't get a simple majority.
of the electorate to vote for them.
by the way.
did I know.
that I am a direct.
descendant.
of.
e.e. cummings.
it is true.
prepare for the worst.
Posted by: MeTroSexual at September 11, 2008 02:15 PM (mTWN+)
Fuck you right back, MTT. Take your sage advice and shove it. Everyone here knows it's a tough slog, you're not adding anything new to the conversation, except hyping all the reasons Obama could win, and ignoring all avenues for McCain to win. I'm glad people like you did not get to decide on whether the surge would work in Iraq. You think you're a realist, but you're simply a loser.
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 02:15 PM (qxc7J)
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Colorado, New Mexico, Florida
...
wiserbud,
Don't be so sure.
Above all else, William Jefferson Clinton is the ultimate narcisssist, willing to put his own love of others adulating him (in this case being the rescuer of Obama) ahead of his fealty to Hillary. And no, It won't be the first time.
Gran,
Have all the faith you want.
I want McCain to win. That I don't think he will doesn't stop me from working for him.
...
LLR,
Did you see the Dems Convention?
WJ Clinton energized his base and it's a different base that Obama's.
Clinton (both of them) can deliver Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Florida, Michigan for Obama.
...
Look Morons, believe what you want.
William Jefferson Clinton will be damaging to McCain.
And if Hillary joins him, it's game over.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:15 PM (O0Kyl)
Use of the term "neocon": Check.
Quote from "Republican" Senator who was so true to his party that he quit it as soon as he got tossed out on his ass by the voters and it didn't serve him any purpose any more: Check.
Hypocritical attacks that completely ignore the fact that Bill Clinton was "nothing but a governor of a lesser state" when he was championed by the Democrats? Check.
Blind ignorance of what NATO actually does? Check.
Yeah, I'd say they're panicked.
It makes me want to dance.
Posted by: RajivVindaloo at September 11, 2008 02:16 PM (Rn2+D)
Whatever. He's really bring the weak assed shit though. I have a tingling in my leg and it hurts to pee, we're doomed I tell ya, doomed.
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 02:16 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: JB at September 11, 2008 02:19 PM (qxc7J)
Yeah, Billy Jeff is gonna go out campaigning for the One.
Right after the Annual Meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative. That's September 26.
On September 27, Billy Jeff will have some other important pressing issues to deal with. Count on it.
You know I'm righteous on this one.
Posted by: SlaveDog at September 11, 2008 02:19 PM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: Gran at September 11, 2008 02:19 PM (mTWN+)
LOL.
...
JB,
Um, no.
Look bro', you don't know me and I don't know you.
I have been a 100% supporter of the war and out troops. Hell, I almost joined the reserves in 2004.
I have gone near-postal on 9-11 Truthers in San Francisco, and had to be pulled off so-called anti-war protesters.
Work hard to get McCain elected.
Be prepared when he loses.
...
MeTrosexual
That was funny.
Insulting, but funny.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:22 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Ray Robison at September 11, 2008 02:22 PM (HzyJe)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:24 PM (O0Kyl)
by the way.
did I know.
that I am a direct.
descendant.
of.
e.e. cummings.
it is true.
prepare for the worst.
HAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Posted by: Max Power at September 11, 2008 02:29 PM (q177U)
When in danger,
When in doubt.
Run in circles,
Scream and Shout!!
Do the Math.
Just sayin' is all.
We're doomed.
Really.
Bend over and kiss your butt good-bye.
Big Bill Clinton is coming out swinging.
Every candidate he's ever backed has won.
Well, except for Hillary, maybe.
But, really.
He's very scary.
We're doomed, doomed I tell you.
I thing I'll go over to Excitable's house and let him do me.
Posted by: MeToo,TooThenNowandForever at September 11, 2008 02:29 PM (1Sf5X)
My Message to ABC.
Let us pray that Mr. Gibson explains what "exact words" means to Ms. Plain during the next interview.
Posted by: Danb at September 11, 2008 02:32 PM (oXOpH)
Of course I saw the Democrat's convention.
That's when I knew it was over.
William Jefferson Clinton's base was energized and hot and bothered.
That if a force like I have never seen since you, me, and Andi had that wild night in that truck stop bathroom.
I want to win.
But I know we can't
I just know that Ohio and the other states Obama needs to win will fall back in love with William Jefferson Clinton.
And the lesbian counties will go for Hillary Clinton.
Make sure you all drink Green Tea in Jan 1009
Green Tea is good to calm people down after bad things happen.
I am a life-long Republican.
Don't question my patriotism.
I once ripped some crippled Jewish lady a new one for calling Bush a jerk.
I am authentic.
Posted by: LifeLongRepublican at September 11, 2008 02:34 PM (qAMnO)
Florida and Ohio will be very difficult to flip to Obama. McCain has polled over 50% in both of those states recently. And that means uncommitted voters must flip. That's a difficult task.
Colorado and New Mexico are possible. Colorado has a bunch of Californians who moved. And they're gumming up the works, for sure. Meanwhile NM is always close but McCain will have the advantage given the proximity of his home state.
That said, McCain can flip any number of states to offset Colorado's loss, if that happens. And I fully expect McCain to have a better than 50-50 shot as Obama continues to prove himself ineffectual in an actual political fight.
That said, the return key is really off putting. Seriously. You read like a jack ass when you type like that.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 02:34 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: Iwaseatingablockofcheesethesizeofacarbattery at September 11, 2008 02:34 PM (GGhvX)
Spread your cheeks
and grab your ankles.
You are all going to
get
analy raped by Obama,
BIG time.
And Guess
what?
He won't be using
ANY
lube.
Posted by: MeTooAlso at September 11, 2008 02:35 PM (q177U)
Let's see where the polls go in the two weeks.
If WJC is committed to working for Obama don't come crying. It's great to be enthusiastic for Sarah Palin, but she's not running for president.
Obama is a sham, a nothing, a total phony.
But he has the most powerful information in the world behind him.
Clinton still has tremendous appeal to millions of voters.
He can (and in my opinion) will be the game breaker.
If you don't agree, fine.
But as for going over to Andrew Sullivan's, I leave that to you. You seem to know all about it.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:39 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 02:39 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 02:41 PM (nOQ1R)
MeTooThen is making one key mistake: Assuming that the Clintons WANT Obama to win.
All the "gaffes" that Bill made on the trail for Hillary? Expect them to be even more pronounced for Obama's campaigning.
If you think Hillary has given up her drive to be the first female president, you've consumed something much stronger than kool-aid.
Posted by: Darury at September 11, 2008 02:42 PM (Ka/c9)
I hope McCain's folks are preparing a video of Gibson's questions and Obama's non-answers from the trail.
Ummm... I know where he is...we'll get him...Everyone needs to calm down...ummmhrr...Nato...yes...and...Ummm...
Posted by: Petro at September 11, 2008 02:43 PM (4dZXF)
i will ask
my estate
to sue
you
for
copyright
infringement
and then
I will eat your
bbrrraaaaiiiinnnsss
if you do
not
cease and desist
with your halfassed
impersonation
of me
are we clear
Posted by: zombie e e cummings at September 11, 2008 02:45 PM (mTWN+)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 02:51 PM (briex)
You're annoyed.
Sorry bro'.
I'll try real hard not to do it again.
Or not.
As for the map http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/ yes, McCain is up in FL today. But just at the MOE.
And yes, I think WJC wants Obama to win. And yes, I think he can deliver the toss-up states, IN, OH, PA, CO, MI, even FL.
The undecideds need something or someone to move them, and I think WJC can do it.
If not, hell, I'll be happy.
You know, it's strange how quickly and intensely people turn on others the blogosphere. I suppose it's part of the AOS HQ Lifestyle, so be it.
But that you're annoyed, really fucking annoyed, means nothing to me.
Sorry.
Really.
I just hope you get over it soon.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:53 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:54 PM (O0Kyl)
I thought about typing "Just saying'" but I just couldn't bring myself to that level of douchy-ness. I tried. And normally I'm not afraid to be a complete dick. But somehow that was beneath me.
Thanks for picking up my slack.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 02:54 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: eman at September 11, 2008 02:56 PM (TE1SV)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 02:57 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:00 PM (nOQ1R)
I'm not sayin' to do the math, but B.O. has billions of dollars of Soros money and millions of brain-dead Bush hating losers who for some reason think he should be President.
Posted by: Iwaseatingablockofcheesethesizeofacarbattery at September 11, 2008 03:00 PM (GGhvX)
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 03:00 PM (evdj2)
My compatriot has explained it all to you in plain English.
He has done this "math" you speak of.
Clinton = wants Obama to win
Clinton can deliver toss-up states.
States that are toss-ups, such as Indiana and Florida and Ohio.
Andi and I has a "toss-up" in several of these states.
Don't ask.
But these states are always toss-ups.
And even though they always go red...
WAF
Because Clinton will win them for Obama
QED
Just sayin'
Posted by: LifeLongRepublican at September 11, 2008 03:00 PM (qAMnO)
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 03:04 PM (O0Kyl)
You're close.
And I'm sorry you and Andi had a toss up.
Ick.
But otherwise, you pretty much get it.
Or got it.
Either way, I won't ask.
And please don't you tell.
You've said enough.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 03:06 PM (O0Kyl)
Posted by: DCox at September 11, 2008 03:07 PM (2pT9a)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 03:07 PM (briex)
And Colorado once.
But he has lots of attractive qualities.
He gets ladies me an MTT I get Bears.
People will think they're voting for William Jefferson Clinton
You still have not factored in the lesbian counties.
Just sayin'
Posted by: LifeLongRepublican at September 11, 2008 03:09 PM (qAMnO)
"That's funny, usually when I hear an "exact quote", it includes the subject ("us") -and- the verb ("pray") in the sentence. Does ABC think the subject and verb of a quoted sentence are generally optional?
"Well, if your defense is going to be that you were just quoting from the AP, I'm sure you'll be interviewing some AP editors and taking it as your solemn duty to trash their reputation (justly) the way you just did with Palin (unjustly). Any day now."
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at September 11, 2008 03:11 PM (3FVXC)
Yeah, that's about right.
Why is it so hard for you Morons to get this?
Sarah is great. I know.
McCain wants full amnesty. He believes in AGW. He fought against conservative judges. McCain-Feingold.
Did I mention Sarah is great?
Half of America and now most of the world think she's the Devil's Spawn and they can't tell McCain from Bush.
"A hard slog" yeah, whatever JB.
Look Morons, work hard to get McCain elected. Fantastic.
If you think I am a fear monger, I can deal with that.
But unless you Morons can find a way to get Charlie Gibson from looking down his nose at Sarah Palin, and editing her words, and the NYT, WaPO, CBS, NBC, and virtually every other media outlet besides Rush and Townhall to counterspin, the addition of WJC is going to tip this election.
If you think I'm wrong.
I get it, you do.
Fine.
Let's have another flame war in three weeks and if I'm wrong, go ahead, tell me off.
But if McCain is behind, you better think of something else other than ripping on me.
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 03:14 PM (O0Kyl)
Why do you keep insulting notropis when responding to my comments?
Are you... well, I hate to ask... Are you wearing your helmet today? Did you bump your fragile little head and disrupt your brainthoughts?
Now I feel bad for insulting a retard, and not the good kind. Ah well, it's nothing that some Val-U-Rite can't fix. *glug, glug, glug* There. I fixed it.
What a maroon.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:15 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 03:19 PM (pie3U)
Posted by: TJ at September 11, 2008 03:20 PM (KsaYS)
Don't you people get it?
We cannot win when the MSN is against us.
They control the narrative and we have no say in it.
Where would we be if the media was against us in 1980, 1984, 1988, 2000, 2002, 2004?
= lost.
I don't like McCain.
Me and MTT will be back in 3 weeks after you all see that we are losing then.
And then you will take us seriously!
Just sayin'
Posted by: LifeLongRepublican at September 11, 2008 03:21 PM (qAMnO)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 03:23 PM (briex)
You might not want to lead with the 68 inches of dick thing. The girls that are interested are freaks. And all the ones who aren't interested will think you're a freak. But if it works let me know.
Cheers.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:26 PM (nOQ1R)
No doubt.
Not even close.
William Jefferson Clinton today has called the race."
Well now... that depends upon what your definition of *IS* is.
Posted by: Mark at September 11, 2008 03:27 PM (3vFfp)
Posted by: notropis at September 11, 2008 03:28 PM (briex)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H-btXPfhGs
PS: I meant to add that Gibson appears to be correct, so maybe before writing ABC, you might want to watch that video.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 03:29 PM (pie3U)
Bill (William Jefferson, whatever), hates Obama--personally. His associates have recently gone on record commenting how he is still seething over the race issue of the democratic primary. And although Dick Morris' track record on political prognostication is pretty bad, I think he is in his element when he discusses the likely motives and trajectory that the Clinton's are going to take. He called this one right after Hillary lost, and Bill and Hillary are doing exactly what he anticipated right up to the present. Before the Clinton's can do damage, they have to be invited back into the house--at least in the minds of people like you.
Posted by: DCox at September 11, 2008 03:31 PM (2pT9a)
The fact that she didn't blow it (from what I gather from the moron ensemble) is a testament to how well she did. No topic off limits. Qualitatively unlimited access for extended time from a "top" guy from the DNC MSM.
Contrast to Obama and others: Restricted access. Topics to be discussed known in advance. Very short intervals and certainly not enough for follow-up. For example O'Reilly had 30 minutes total with Obama, and Obama only agreed to do O'Reilly's interview so that he could blunt the post-RNC convention bounce and not because he wanted to face O'Reilly. His 300 advisors assuredly told him he had to do it.
All things considered, I don't have to watch Gibson's work at all to know already that Palin did great, that she could think on her feet and hold her own. At this point, McCain needs her more than she needs McCain, which explains why she has been touring side-by-side with McCain rather than by her lonesome.
Palinmania will continue whether Soros et al. flush more money down the toilet or not. Team McCain still has plenty of ammo it can continuously roll out that will impact ignorant voters.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at September 11, 2008 03:33 PM (sI5Ho)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at September 11, 2008 03:33 PM (mD4t/)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:34 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 03:34 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: INCITEmarsh - click to FUCK THE TRUTHERS at September 11, 2008 03:40 PM (ULsz9)
+8
+7
+5
Tied (Rasmussen)
McCain in Ohio:
+7
+4
+1
down 5 (Quinnipiac)
McCain in Michigan:
+1 (InAdv/Poll Position)
down 1
down 1
down 4
down 5
McCain in Colorado:
down 3
down 3
down 1
McCain in New Mexico:
+4
+2
down 13 (CNN/Time)
McCain in Virginia:
+2
+2
+4
McCain in Pennsylvania:
down 2
down 2
down 3
McCain in New Jersey:
down 6
McCain in Nevada:
+1
That does not look like a map that drastically favors Obama.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:44 PM (nOQ1R)
And it's a map that shows McCain solidifying his hold on Ohio and Florida.
If McCain needs to overcome the loss of Colorado, he can.
Nothing succeeds like success. So let's all get behind the Palin/McCain (whoops) ticket.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 03:46 PM (nOQ1R)
>Douchenozzle.
Lovely.
I'm a Sarah Palin supporter, asshat. But I thought it wouldn't do her cause, or ours, any good to storm ABC's gate because of a supposedly bogus claim that Gibson didn't use an "exact quote" when it looks like he did.
If the video is bogus, all you have to do is prove it, because I'm sure it's the one that Gibson is going by.
>Don't be a dupe, Jack. Read the post.
I did. And then I made the effort to check it out for myself. It appears that those *are* Sarah Palin's words, and *I* don't find very much to dislike about them. Although I can see why some on the left might.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 03:50 PM (pie3U)
Gibson's a tool and Gov. Palin came thru this biased interrogation just fine. The more the Lamestreams attemt to diminish her the more votes she gets.
Posted by: George at September 11, 2008 03:56 PM (UReDZ)
My apologies, Jack. I mistook you for Concerned.
His quote is exact, as far as it goes, but to edit it in that way is an attempt to mislead and Charlie knows it.
Republican candidate quote: There are those would imply that Obama is a well know butt-pirate but I'm not one of them.
Tobias edit: Obama is a well know butt-pirate
Exact words indeed.
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 03:58 PM (evdj2)
My bad.
I take full responsibility for that.
Really.
Yes, maybe I did bump my head
...
Mark,
LOL.
Good one.
...
DCox,
Bill Clinton loves Bill Clinton. He will sacrifice Hillary to be the Savior to the Savior.
And I hope you're right.
But I think you're wrong.
...
Posted by: MeTooThen at September 11, 2008 04:02 PM (O0Kyl)
you put your right foot in
you put your right foot out
you do the hokey
pokey
and you shake it all about
do the math
jusy sayin'
Posted by: Senator Clay Pavers at September 11, 2008 04:07 PM (nEjKj)
Apology accepted.
>His quote is exact, as far as it goes, but to edit it in that way is an attempt to >mislead and Charlie knows it.
He used her *exact* words; I don't know what else anyone can ask of him.
There's a lot of good reasons to hate the MSM, and I'm no fan of Gibson, but he did his job here. He used her exact words. I don't think Ace would want to make a big deal out of this, if he knew those *were* her exact words, but I could be wrong about that.
This thread is now being mentioned over on Glenn Reynold's site, so it won't be long before it gets broadcast far and wide.
Clamoring to ABC with a bogus claim doesn't seem very smart to me.
It's more like something the left would do.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 04:08 PM (pie3U)
I am partially retarded.
My father raped me as a child,
and I type like
this
because I am an illiterate
sucker
of
the
cock.
P.S. Milky
Loads is here right now
Drilling my ass
for
oil.
Posted by: Barack "Man Child" Obama at September 11, 2008 04:15 PM (UUwxQ)
You go too far, Jack. Its not a bogus claim as I just pointed out. If Gibson was duped himself by an unfairly edited YouTube, it reflects equally poorly on him. To base a gotcha question on something that he didn't have a complete video of is the height of bogusness. It was just too good to check, I guess.
There are those who would say that Charlie Gibson is a spunk-gargling Obama-bot but I will refuse to make such a personal attack.
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 04:20 PM (evdj2)
Hot Air has the 15 minute long video if you doubt.
Posted by: Matt in Maine at September 11, 2008 04:27 PM (OkODJ)
I think you have a great career ahead of you in the mainstream media.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at September 11, 2008 04:29 PM (3FVXC)
That's some mighty nice editing you got there. I'm sure you believe Jon Stewart's interviews happen in the order he presents them. And the Colbert Report doesn't fuck with quotes either. Nope. Straight fuckin' reporting on that one.
Get a fucking clue, douchenozzle.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 04:32 PM (nOQ1R)
It's bogus to claim that Gibson misquoted her, or took her words out of context, etc. He didn't. And there are other copies of videos out there, of her entire speech before her church (they're out there and pretty easy to find), which suggest that those are her EXACT WORDS, so either they've *all* been edited, or she actually said them.
The burden of proof is yours.
Prove the video(s) have been edited and you have a story.
If you can't, you'll just make yourselves look foolish, and end up actually harming Palin, not helping her.
But it's your choice.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 04:32 PM (pie3U)
Jack, here's what she said:
"We should pray that our national leaders are sending them on a task from God."
Here's what they quoted (exact words according to Charlie Gibson):
"Our national leaders are sending them on a task from God."
That's a big difference. Chop those first few words off and a prayer becomes a declaration of fact. Much the same as "We should pray that the fight is over" is different from saying "The fight is over."
Posted by: Average Jen at September 11, 2008 04:33 PM (OINAg)
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 04:34 PM (pie3U)
That's exactly what he did. By removing the lead in and even chopping off the first part of her sentence, he fundamentally altered the meaning.
Its really quite clear cut.
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 04:36 PM (evdj2)
So, tell me, do the interviews on The Daily Show prove everything they claim?
Did Michael Moore's editing fool you too?
Get a fucking clue.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 04:36 PM (nOQ1R)
Exact words? Well yeah, but not the complete sentence. Hence, out of context. I have to think you didn't see the same video I saw.
Posted by: bunny boy at September 11, 2008 04:37 PM (14YLc)
"My fellow citizens of the world: ask... what America will do for you...for the freedom of man." JFK
I first thought of Martin Luther King but, surprisingly, it's difficult to screw around with his "I have a dream" speech and make it read as anythng other than itself.
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 04:38 PM (htk1u)
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 04:40 PM (evdj2)
"I am happy to... go down... on a... Negro." Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream Speech" from the longer quote below:
*****************************
I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.
Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.
But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land.
************************
Eh, it's easy to fuck with speeches.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 04:44 PM (nOQ1R)
*Now* I see what you're talking about! I looked for more videos and finally found this one*, and I agree. Yes, it does look like either Gibson or ABC did this on purpose, and dropped the first part of her lines, which put everything into context.
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2ypVSYoEKA&feature=related
Thanks for straightening me out, Jen!
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 04:48 PM (pie3U)
Posted by: toby928 at September 11, 2008 04:49 PM (evdj2)
Jack couldn't be troubled to read the fucking post that Ace took the trouble to craft. He had to emote. And shit.
Douchenozzle.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 04:53 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 04:54 PM (nOQ1R)
I read the post. But I want the words right from the horse's mouth.
Thanks to Jen, I finally found them.
>Douchenozzle.
Fuck you, you cocksucking twit.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 04:57 PM (pie3U)
Geez, Nom.
I was actually playing with something quite similar myself but felt such a rush of shame that I had to avert my eyes. You, clearly, have no such issues with blushing.
heh
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:00 PM (htk1u)
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:01 PM (htk1u)
Yeah. I felt a pang of shame. But then I went for it. Would you like me to do the same with Lincoln and Jefferson just to be safe?
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:03 PM (nOQ1R)
Fuck! What the hell are they doing on Fox cutting Mac's answer to the bait question about Palin demeaning Obama's community organizer past?!
He started strong on that answer and Fox cut it completely!
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:03 PM (htk1u)
American Broad-casting: is this a sexist parlor game at the All Barack Channel? Looks like Governor Palin was a little heavy for Charlie-boy to cast, even with cheating. His attempt to infantilize the governor made him out to be the liberal condescending prick he is. The media can't keep themselves from losing this election for their precious One. Instead of being "Rathered" into office like W was by CBS, Sarah Palin may well be "Gibsoned" into office by the sexism of the left's media.
Posted by: twolaneflash at September 11, 2008 05:03 PM (05dZx)
Yes, you're absolutely correct.
That second video I found, which revealed everything she'd said beforehand, finally got the point across.
It may not be the "complete opposite", but it's substantially different from what Gibson and ABC were trying to convey.
And probably intentionally, too.
Thanks for helping to clear it up for me!
Joe
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:04 PM (pie3U)
If you want the words straight from the horse's ass, you'll need a mirror. Or two. I don't know whether you're fat or not.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:04 PM (nOQ1R)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:06 PM (nOQ1R)
My exact words.
Posted by: bustoff at September 11, 2008 05:06 PM (1jnf/)
Nom, you read me like 68 pt font.
Actually, I would love to see it. Frankly, if you could brutalize their speeches in Haiku form, I have it on good authority that Jack might even let you enjoy an evening alone with Miss Suzanne Sena.
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:07 PM (htk1u)
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:09 PM (pie3U)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 11, 2008 05:12 PM (6L459)
Why would a cocksucking little twit want an evening with Suzanne Sena???
Now an evening with Barney Frank, maybe.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:13 PM (pie3U)
Don't worry though. I'm the twit. You were wrong the whole while. But don't let that get you down. I'm sure you're used to it. I just sneezed into a napkin smarter snot than you.
But Jen saved the day by telling you that you were wrong. All I did was tell you the same fucking thing. Are your google skills that weak? Are you new to the interwebs? You see, it's a series of tubes...
jmflynny,
I tried to work with the Gettysburg Address but it's too short. And as for Jefferson, that's easy since I can just make up quote Shit Jefferson Said, Volume III, like John Kerry did.
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:15 PM (nOQ1R)
Teh ghey insults are amusing. Are you scared of teh ghey? Are you scared of teh penis? Do you take a shower while wearing clothes?
Is that really the best you've got?
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:16 PM (nOQ1R)
No, you're the *cocksucking* little twit.
>You were wrong the whole while.
Yes, I was. It wasn't the first time, it probably won't be the last.
But unlike you, I'm usually right.
>But don't let that get you down.
Nothing gets me down, not even cocksucking little twits like you, you cocksucking little twit.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:19 PM (pie3U)
No, I just don't like cocksucking little twits, even straight ones.
>Are you scared of teh penis?
I prefer the vagina, yes.
>Do you take a shower while wearing clothes?
Did Barney Frank really come in your mouth?
>Is that really the best you've got?
We'll see, won't we?
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:23 PM (pie3U)
Actually, I didn't, because that would turn a simple fuck up that happens to everyone into a display of total assholishness. The best thing to do in this situation is to let it go. I'm just sayin'
Posted by: bunny boy at September 11, 2008 05:24 PM (14YLc)
Posted by: Nom de Blog at September 11, 2008 05:24 PM (nOQ1R)
But Jen saved the day by telling you that you were wrong. All I did was tell you the same fucking thing.
Well, I can be quite persuasive.
And speaking of, I think that's the most hostile interview I've ever witnessed on television. Holy shit.
She's trying to answer a question, and Gibson says "I'm lost in a blizzard of words here. I'm still not sure what your answer is."
Oh really? With Obama, it's velvety nuance. He's so thoughtful. He considers every angle. But with her it's a "blizzard of words." What a fucking ass.
Posted by: Average Jen at September 11, 2008 05:24 PM (OINAg)
No, you're a *cocksucking little twit*.
Plus, you're apparently all hat, no cattle.
>Fare thee well, Jack Off.
And fuck you, too, cocksucker.
Jack
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:29 PM (pie3U)
Posted by: Jack at September 11, 2008 05:30 PM (pie3U)
I was quite dismayed that you mis-characterized Gov. Palin's quote before her congregation. As you very clearly only provided part of her quote you either did this knowingly to have a 'gotcha' moment, or you used the AP quote without doing your own research. It was even more disappointing to see you stuck to that track even when she explained it to you. I think the likely answer is your research failed you. That's fine, but you clearly owe on on air correction. Thanks.
Posted by: Silk at September 11, 2008 05:35 PM (kIz/p)
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:37 PM (htk1u)
Posted by: jmflynny at September 11, 2008 05:39 PM (htk1u)
Because she's a social conservative and that's the worst possible person on earth. Add to that her popularity and charisma, and the fact that she very well may become president and the tooth gnashing is deafening.
Fiscal conservatives are annoying because they cut taxes and try to pare the government back but social conservatives appoint judges who won't do the bidding of the left, and that's all the power they have.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at September 11, 2008 05:40 PM (0+Ggj)
"To them, hating Sarah Palin is a symptom of larger bigotry against the rest of us, the normal. If they saw her at a party, they would wonder how she got in. She's the anti-Obama, the anti-New York Times, the anti-everything that Tim Robbins loves, which is why I love her — and you should too."
And it's true. They all hated Palin even before they knew there was a Palin to hate. Theyre sayin she's a smelly ol hog-ette in hose not cause of her stench is so bad but cause they hate her head to hocks. Theyre sayin she's filthy swine cause they aint had Sarah Shots. Theyve gone and registered probly 11 million or so illegals who don't even speak American and theyre feedin em all high protein Bridge to NowhereGate & TrooperGate & Ban BooksGate & Conflict-of-InterestGate & Expense-AccountGate & Screw-Due-ProcessGate & Forgot-to-Tell-Daughter-What-Boys-Like-To-DoGate & God knows what the shut the damn Gate all else - just so Spiffy Hans von Spavokodpiece & his voter fraud police have to put em all in jail before they get to steal this election.
Now this Gutty piece no mere spin. It's got that particularly rare clarity that even surpasses mere 'greatness' [Some liberal Dems might spell it "grateness", which also goes to the point.].
Folks, we're talking Babe Ruth pointing to right center in World Serious to punish the Chi Town Commies for not cutting his old buddy on their bench an equal share.
We're talking Butkus snorting flames to gain traction to get after YA Tittle.
We're talking Junior Johnson hisownself tellin' his pit crew to git off fightin' that minor fire under the hood he got a damn RACE to win!
There may be other ways: Vulcan mind meld, and DNA splicing are just a couple that come to mind.
Could be McCain gets to figurin with Missy Palin there aint nuthin worth wastin & git her to hook herself up twice a day to a sort of combination reverse dialysis machine & other bodily fluids retrieval system, call up ol T Boone to throw in for Precious Bodily Fluids Essence Purifier, suitably diluted to tamp down all that awesome raw power, then fill up 10,000 or so mini atomizers a day, start sending it out for distribution over the 30 days before the election and the duststorm in Obama's face will be so thick he'll quit or choke tryin.
Gut Shooter is saying if the Dems figger to call the Pod People's Party the Party of Hate then the PPP can play that game, just as dirty, twice as stinky & with lipstick on it to boot.
Hall - - of - - Fame - - stuff.
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:29 PM (nrD02)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:33 PM (nrD02)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:35 PM (nrD02)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0UQbA0ZmmM
And write to Gibson at those links above!
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 11, 2008 06:38 PM (6go9w)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:40 PM (nrD02)
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:45 PM (nrD02)
How long can Sean hold out against these forces of evil?
Posted by: Diderot's dog at September 11, 2008 06:48 PM (nrD02)
Fact-checking, my ass.
Posted by: qrstuv at September 11, 2008 07:25 PM (zWeA8)
Has anyone considered that when Barack responds to a question with ....mmmmm....uhhhhhhh....rrrrrrr....slurpslurpslurp...mmmmm....uhhhh...
that he's actually thinking about sucking cock, including taking breaths, as a mental pacifier of sorts?
OK, I made the slurp stuff up. But geez....)
Posted by: fulldroolcup at September 11, 2008 07:25 PM (fH1BE)
Metoothen: so Barry has gone from Saviour and Messiah and "The One" to
"I'm better than any Republican MoFo!!!"
Man, that's some inspirational shit!
Posted by: fulldroolcup at September 11, 2008 07:34 PM (fH1BE)
Using this logic I'm sure he'll ask Barack about this the next time he sits down with him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65I0HNvTDH4
Posted by: rockhead at September 11, 2008 08:09 PM (DvaIL)
"Charlie, you said in your interview with Gov. Palin that "our national leaders are God." Do you still agree with that ?
CG: "Ummm.... I'm not sure if that's exactly what I said."
Me: "Exact words."
(actual quote: "GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, "Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.""
Close enough by ABC standards.
Posted by: JB at September 12, 2008 01:58 AM (JC9Hy)
Posted by: Kim at September 12, 2008 04:32 AM (NuONE)
Let me say that I think it's idiotic that some people believe that Charles Gibson is on a mission from Satan.
But wait. I guess the "exact words" a top journalist would attribute to me are that "Charles Gibson is on a mission from Satan"? Did I get that right? Please advise.
Thanks, Don
Posted by: Don at September 12, 2008 04:35 AM (bBy12)
Posted by: Mary RN at September 14, 2008 06:48 AM (vt8OU)
, %P, knock off coach purses
, jrb, Paris Hilton Sex Tape All Kinds
, 028445, Cheapest groping train
, 8-[[, no credit check loans
, xhe,
Posted by: Kelly at February 10, 2009 02:11 PM (q9Lt0)
Posted by: avchd converter at February 26, 2009 10:36 AM (VB712)
, Rebi.Posted by: Rebi at July 18, 2009 09:41 AM (RwHhp)
Posted by: arewt at July 22, 2009 01:25 AM (q46RK)
Vacuum cleaners for electric tools.Posted by: Vacuum cleaners for electric tools at August 08, 2009 07:37 AM (bZ8te)
. Compact air conditioners.Posted by: Compact air conditioners at August 14, 2009 09:57 AM (bZ8te)
Good movie, very<a href="http://www.flashreplica.com/" title="louis vuitton">Louis Vuitton</a> good
Ah well this <a href="http://www.flashreplica.com/" title="louis vuitton">Louis Vuitton</a>video
Posted by: louis vuitton at September 16, 2009 06:21 AM (iFT09)
Anyone know louis vuitton outlet near by? I am looking for one but never get.
I just bought this bag from louis vuitton which located in New York city, it’s wonderful.
cheap louis vuitton are located in all major cities such as Shanghai, New York, etc, you may travel to these cities and get one for yourself.
I never buy from louis vuitton bags, the price is expensive and I always bought online.
Hi, everybody here, I just spent more than 1000 USD in louis vuitton outlet and bought one gift for my wife, I think it’s worth and the bag drives my wife crazy.
Posted by: LV at October 05, 2009 10:55 PM (APjW2)
Posted by: heheheroling at October 26, 2009 07:37 AM (bec9Z)
Posted by: hihandbag at November 02, 2009 04:58 AM (B6+vy)
Posted by: dfkj at December 18, 2009 12:23 AM (hFSt1)
Let's Think Out Of The Box Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On The Net Tricks and Tips Big Conspiracies
Posted by: Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On The Net at January 12, 2010 01:49 PM (1d5+d)
Posted by: nfl2010 at January 31, 2010 08:21 AM (mzj5S)
Posted by: zy at February 01, 2010 12:46 AM (LUbnV)
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.
