July 01, 2008
— Ace This time it's former Kerry foreign policy adviser Rand Beers, fretting that McCain missed out on all that good Vietnam-era political education due to his being "isolated" from the country in a cage.
Of course Obama -- A Different Kind of Politician (TM) -- makes the rote "rejection" of some comments, and yet, somehow, they just keep on coming.
This is a bad move by Obama -- and yes, with eight prominent Democrats trying out different variations of "McCain's service is meaningless/actually makes him a less fit candidate" to see which one the public might like, it's a move by Obama himself.
McCain fights dirty (or at least fights angry) when he thinks his honor or integrity or service has been impugned, and here it's beyond question. Hopefully McCain will wake up from his dream-world in which he and Obama nobly rise above "personal attacks" on the other and respond with some counter-fire.
So McCain doesn't have enough foreign policy experience because he was unfortunately "isolated" from the intensity of the leftist anti-war movement in America.
Given that Obama's "Chicago mainstream" pals are terrorist bombesr for the Weather Underground, we know he's familiar with that period and its predominant mode of leftist thought. So I guess he's the one with real experience, huh?
Audio: at Hot Air.
Allah notes that Rand Beers wants to claim John Kerry had the the requisite experience (given he was so closely associated with Kerry), so his distinction turns on whether someone served in the "ground forces" or not.
But Beers allows you didn't have to be in the ground forces to have garnered foreign policy experience -- so long as you were not serving in the military at all but experiencing the "turmoil" at home, then everything's jake.
So: Beers and Kerry have the sufficient military/foreign policy experience. Barack Obama, by dint of his not serving in the military and experiencing Vietnam through television, also has it.
The one guy who doesn't have it? The guy who spent five and half years being tortured by the enemy and who turned down early release to honor the principle of first in, first out, and stand in solidarity with his fellow captured servicemen.
Update: Good James Kirchick article in the Politico.
The only obstacle between Barack Obama and the presidency is the mountain of smears that will no doubt come his way. Thats the narrative that Obama supporters and his swooning chroniclers in the mainstream media would have us believe....
Writers Evan Thomas and Richard Wolfe concluded that the 2008 presidential election will be no different. It is a sure bet that the GOP will try to paint Obama as the other as a haughty black intellectual who has Muslim roots (Obama is a Christian) and hangs around with America-haters.
But has it been a sure bet?
Not really. Thus far, no one with any serious affiliation to John McCain's campaign has resorted to the alleged scare tactics in which Republicans and, apparently, only Republicans have been perfecting since Richard Nixon was first elected. On the contrary, if the past few months have showed us anything, its that the Obama campaign is the one dealing in crude smears.
[Recounts various Democratic denigrations of McCain's war record, from Jay "Sgt. Rock" Rockefeller to Rand Beers.]Its curious how anyone could argue that a man with such visceral understanding of the capacity for what Americas enemies will do to our men and women in uniform doesnt fully appreciate the cost of war. But even more troubling is the unmistakable pattern of these smears, all of them unsubtly alleging that McCain is an unhinged, mentally unstable warmonger who would deploy soldiers capriciously because he hasnt truly experienced the horrors of ground battle. Indeed, the claims of these four men and the short period of time in which they were all uttered are so similar in tone that one would be foolish not to at least consider the possibility they were coordinated by the Obama campaign.
Nevertheless, the fears of Obama supporters that their candidate lies eternally vulnerable to GOP smears exists only in their fevered imaginations....The belief that the Republican Party has been successfully scaring voters since 1968 is a comforting salve for Democrats. After all, its much easier for them to demonize conservatives than consider that the reason for their electoral defeats may lie with liberal ideas. Please dont take that as a "smear.
Posted by: Ace at
08:14 AM
| Comments (67)
Post contains 743 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: redherkey at July 01, 2008 08:17 AM (kjqFg)
Just checking.
Posted by: HokiePundit at July 01, 2008 08:39 AM (euaFa)
I would not have believed that the Democrat party would actually pick a candidate that is worse than John F'n Kerry.
Posted by: roy at July 01, 2008 08:44 AM (cB77O)
Posted by: Lou at July 01, 2008 08:47 AM (RNwpX)
Posted by: Cerebral Paul Z. at July 01, 2008 08:53 AM (cQhQZ)
Indeed, the claims of these four men and the short period of time in which they were all uttered are so similar in tone that one would be foolish not to at least consider the possibility they were coordinated by the Obama Clinton campaign.
Fixed. And sweet, sweet schadenfreude it is.
Posted by: Oldsmoblogger at July 01, 2008 09:04 AM (arEOF)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at July 01, 2008 09:04 AM (0+Ggj)
"It is a sure bet that the GOP will try to paint Obama as the other as a haughty ( ) black ( ) intellectual ( ) who has Muslim roots (Obama is a Christian) and hangs around with America-haters ( )."
Posted by: bgates at July 01, 2008 09:06 AM (nFo6D)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at July 01, 2008 09:27 AM (0+Ggj)
Posted by: Terri at July 01, 2008 09:53 AM (aBFtp)
And he was 30-40 when he befriended him. I guess that too was a "youthful indiscretion."
Bernadette Dohrn actually *cheerleaded* for the Manson murders, calling them "sooo cool." That's the sort of company he's chosen to cultivate -- as an adult.
Posted by: ace at July 01, 2008 09:58 AM (aEOLm)
This is getting tiresome. The democrats convince the media (not a very difficult task) that the republicans are the party of the smear and cheap shot... so when goofball Larry Johnson, a Hillary supporter, says there's a tape of Michelle Obama saying whitey. The AP and the New York Times blame republicans.
Now after several left wing wackos, to include Wesley Clark, say McCain's military service is not a plus (in some cases even saying he should be ashamed of it) - suddenly in one of his hopey/changey speeches Barack informs us that he respects John McCain's service but also takes this opportunity to inform us that he won't allow anyone to question his own patriotism.
Are there still people out there who buy this narrative BS that the democrats are helpless victims of the right wing smear machine?
Posted by: adk46er at July 01, 2008 12:17 PM (aZCPZ)
It's one of the dumbest political attack lines I've ever seen. Are they going to blame the deaths on the Forestall on McCain next?
Posted by: runninrebel at July 01, 2008 12:21 PM (0n9wc)
When are they going to start comparing McCain's stint in a cell to him being just like a convict?
The left these days has no sense of perspective and absolutely no class.
Posted by: Veeshir at July 01, 2008 12:22 PM (ThMnZ)
Posted by: kevlarchick at July 01, 2008 12:24 PM (TNuqz)
When are they going to start comparing McCain's stint in a cell to him being just like a convict?
No no no... remember, Donks love convicts!
Posted by: hhuummbbeerrtt at July 01, 2008 12:25 PM (f7A+e)
Posted by: dan-O at July 01, 2008 12:26 PM (7Nejo)
I don't understand why they're even going there, as they say. The only conclusion is that they have absolutely nothing to use against McCain as far as substance other than his age, his POW record, and how he'll be the 3rd term of George Bush.
That's good news for McCain, I guess.
Posted by: Bart at July 01, 2008 12:27 PM (NrvSe)
Posted by: Greg s at July 01, 2008 12:27 PM (sPO/s)
Military service records are a matter of convenience to Democrats. Good for them, bad for Repubs.
I question their patriotism.
Posted by: EC at July 01, 2008 12:27 PM (mAhn3)
It's one of the dumbest political attack lines I've ever seen. Are they going to blame the deaths on the Forestall on McCain next?
I agree with you. This is why I think McCain will win this year (or rather, Obama will lose). As we get closer to the election and things get more heated up, Obama and his campaign will not be able to portray themselves as the moderates they are trying to be.
Posted by: dan-O at July 01, 2008 12:28 PM (7Nejo)
Posted by: Greg s at July 01, 2008 12:29 PM (sPO/s)
Thats another reason I think McCain is going to win!
Posted by: dan-O at July 01, 2008 12:34 PM (7Nejo)
"Why all this concern over Obama's associates? JOHN MCCAIN spent years associating with known communists!"
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at July 01, 2008 12:35 PM (+qV4i)
I wonder when a "reporter" will shove a microphone in McCain's face and ask him what he thinks about these people questioning his patriotism. Maybe they'll get some good video of McCain punching the "reporter".
Probably not though so don't get your hopes up John Ryan.
Posted by: klrtz1 at July 01, 2008 12:35 PM (HCNr7)
That's where this line of attack logically ends up, so I wouldn't bet against you.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 01, 2008 12:35 PM (Ds4I5)
Posted by: Greg s at July 01, 2008 12:36 PM (sPO/s)
Once again, some lefty dolt romanticizes the 60s.
THEY SUCKED except for some isolated music spots.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 01, 2008 12:37 PM (B+qrE)
I hope McCain comes out fighting like the bastard he can be.
We know he can say "fuck you". Be nice if he said it to someone besides John Cornyn.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 01, 2008 12:37 PM (pzen5)
The Dems have got nothing on McCain's service. That's why we're seeing this ridiculously stupid line of attack from them. There's no way to compare Obama to McCain when it comes to serving the country and self-sacrifice. Their only hope is to make an absolutely batshit crazy attack stick by having multiple Dem celebs repeat it over and over again.
This isn't the last time we're going to hear this crap. There's still plenty of time for another eight stupid fuckwits to say it again.
Posted by: EC at July 01, 2008 12:41 PM (mAhn3)
"These comments are so obviously absurd and insulting to normal Americans that McCain doesn't even need to respond to them beyond the standard dismissal."
Really, runninrebel? How'd that work out for Dubya with the "Bush Lied, People Died" slander?
Hard-assed conservatives like myself who've never trusted McVain are watching his response to this garbage. A wave of the hand and a "this does nothing to bring down the price of gas" weak sister response just hardens the impression that Maverick won't fight back and is still naively thinking the TSM and the Party of Surrender, Slavery and SeditionTM are going to fight fair.
McCain needs to hit back on this hard, fast and now, or get an attack rottweiler ASAP to lure the Magic Negro out from behind his teleprompter and give his glass jaw a good solid punch. Otherwise, it just encourages more of this sleaziness and frustrates the base who see themselves doing the heavy lifting to defend a candidate who won't defend himself.
Remember, we're dealing with an enemy press determined to throw the election to Bambi and a dull-witted public that put the Syphilitic Hillbilly in office twice. If McCain doesn't pound back at this line of attack day and night, it turns into "truth."
Just. You. Watch.
Posted by: Christopher at July 01, 2008 12:47 PM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: S. Weasel at July 01, 2008 12:48 PM (rasT+)
McCain's a nasty fighter once the Times agrees to his choice of opponent.
And I agree, this is the dumbest line of attack I can remember. How can it possiblty reflect well upon Obama? Even if it were an effective negative for McCain, it reflects even worse upon Obama. Sheer stupidity, just blathering any old thing like that.
And Beers is a tool.
Posted by: spongeworthy at July 01, 2008 12:50 PM (a00go)
Posted by: XBradHusseinTC at July 01, 2008 12:51 PM (pSXbN)
"So I think," he continued, "to some extent his national security experience in that regard is sadly limited and I think it is reflected in some of the ways that he thinks about how U.S. forces might be committed to conflicts around the world."
As if McCain could only learn about foreign policy during Vietnam. I mean, I'm sure when he got home, he wasn't curious about it. It's not like he's spent the rest of his life working in related fields or anything.
I'm just sick of Vietnam as any kind of litmus test. Yes, when you look at character, you can sure see some differences btn McCain and oh, say Kerry and Clinton (B). But it isn't about Vietnam.
Posted by: MamaAJ at July 01, 2008 12:52 PM (X6Zdh)
Stinky: I'm laughing my ass at your comment when I suddenly realize that it actually might happen.
The entire thing is just madness, I tell you, madness.
Posted by: mikeyslaw at July 01, 2008 12:57 PM (QMGr1)
How can it possiblty reflect well upon Obama?
Remember how many people voted for Kerry, knowing full well how he behaved after the war? There are a hell of a lot of liberal boomers who protested the war, thought America was the bad guy and can't bear the cognitive dissonance of that vs. knowing what North Korea really did to John McCain.
So they get reminded that McCain wasn't protesting the war and didn't learn the lessons they did. He ain't like us, man.
Posted by: MamaAJ at July 01, 2008 01:00 PM (X6Zdh)
Posted by: Lee at July 01, 2008 01:01 PM (+kJAy)
So, as a result of being shot down, locked in a cage, tortured and beaten for five years, John McCain "missed out on the political education" of the Vietnam era.
Yet at the same time, Obama was 6-10 yrs old and living in Kenya with his father's family. Amazing how a gradeschooler's out of country experience is somehow more educational than a Naval Aviator's combat tours and front row seat to the realities of the war?
Damn, that Obama is one smart guy. We need a whipper-snapper like that to finally make the US a country we can all be proud of. I can just feel the patriotism swelling.
Or maybe it's the bile rising. Can never be sure.
Posted by: Roachman at July 01, 2008 01:02 PM (R4yYw)
A moment please -
Obama's campaign is an insight into his foreign policy approach.
Apparently, nobody actually *works* for Obama, everybody is an independent actor who, apparently, is acting according to their own interests and beliefs.
So far, Obama's policy of "rebuking" has had exactly no deterrent effect. And, given that Obama's not taking any action beyond expressions of regret, there's no consequence.
Hmmmmm .... Barack offers lots of diplomacy, but no deterrence and no consequence.
that'd definitely be a change from the Boooooosh strategy.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at July 01, 2008 01:03 PM (UeP9e)
Either that, or they want to see how hard they can smack McCain before he actually cares. After all, the only people they've ever seen him pissed at are Republicans.
Posted by: bunny boy at July 01, 2008 01:07 PM (XS8F/)
Posted by: pistolero at July 01, 2008 01:10 PM (QuCVu)
Posted by: Lee at July 01, 2008 01:11 PM (+kJAy)
They were beaten for refusing to meet with the traitorous American "peace" delegations that came to visit to showcase how "humanely" the commies were treating the prisoners. Sometimes they disfigured themselves so
Maybe it's just me, but I think being beaten for resisting anti-war propaganda ops gives one a very intimate and hands-on view of American anti-war politics.
Posted by: J. Sidney McStace at July 01, 2008 01:23 PM (JO0c/)
You mean two-term President George W. Bush? The one that won the only majority since Reagan and garnered the most votes of any candidate ever? That Dubya?
Posted by: Instapundito at July 01, 2008 01:33 PM (0n9wc)
Posted by: runninrebel at July 01, 2008 01:34 PM (0n9wc)
That's the thing though, wiserbud. They won't be able to stop themselves. The attacks will continue to escalate until they end up on the "McCain cooperated with the NVA" line in October. They've been dying to "swiftboat" an R for four years and they won't let the chance go by.
Posted by: runninrebel at July 01, 2008 01:38 PM (0n9wc)
Pistolero- the flashpoint you mentioned (more or less) has been reached, least it has in my household.
The two voting age people there have gone from "eh, who cares about picking between a liberal and a LIBERAL" to "That's it- b.hussein is goin' down."
Posted by: oh, it's ON now at July 01, 2008 01:46 PM (I/JNA)
Democrats kinda like McCain. They have to really convince themselves that he's Bush III, that he's not qualified etc. Remember that he's TEH MAVERICK and this has earned him some real cred with the left.
The one thing they don't like about him is the military background.
That's why they're attacking him like this.
It's just poor salesmanship, really (selling on your own perceptions instead of the prospects). It's also why it doesn't make sense to anybody thinking rationally.
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at July 01, 2008 01:47 PM (TXp3z)
It's more than that. Obama cannot approach McCain's service, not even close. The only way to take it off the table is to send surrogates out to diminish it, tell us why it's really no big deal, didn't prepare him to be Commander in Chief, while Obambi delivers a speech that redefines "patriotism" as everything in his agenda.
Sure, it pisses off people who understand honor and sacrifice. But there are a lot of morons that will be persuaded by this crap.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 01, 2008 01:54 PM (pzen5)
Maybe. But if they're that dumb they'll get lost on the way to the polls. Or they'll get distracted by there car keys and go to Starbucks instead.
Posted by: runninrebel at July 01, 2008 01:58 PM (0n9wc)
Guys & girls, I've got to tell you that I am getting a little worried. Why aren't the Repubs throwing any punches? Has ANYONE (except probably the Clintons) done any opposition research in the target rich environment that Obama has inhabited almost all of his life? Obama is famously clumsy when confronted with a question that can't be answered with the help of a teleprompter. Why doesn't someone ask him a "Kitty Dukakis" question and just watch him fold? We need a defining moment.
The Dems are at least throwing something at McCain - admittedly really stupid shit - but, at least they are punching at him.
Are the Repubs afraid of being called racists for asking a question? If so, WAF!
Posted by: noprisoners at July 01, 2008 01:59 PM (eqMup)
This is pathetic. They are attacking him because he was a POW? I understand that they are trying to attack his strengths (integrity, service to the nation, honesty, chin, heart) because Obama does not possess them, but this is so out of line that it is not even funny.
Does this mean the Democratic position re: Vietnam is:
-domestic terrorism is a good thing if you do it for the right reasons. Please enjoy your tenure.
-serving in the military causes you to miss things that would lead to actually understanding foriegn policy if you chose to enter government after serving your country. If you are wounded or a POW you will miss out on important things (rich babyboomers doing stupid shit) and will never really understand what Vietnam was all about.
Posted by: bleh at July 01, 2008 02:00 PM (GNCy6)
There's talk on the lefty sites that that Brave New Films creep is following him around trying to catch him on camera losing his temper. That Mike Stark stalker guy got into a townhall and asked him about a nasty rumor about Cindy McCain and some other guy asked him about him calling his wife the c-word. Then there's the Code Pinkos who follow him from venue to venue to disrupt his speeches.
So I think there's an effort being made by the nutters to provoke a reaction, and he's certainly had to put up with more crap on the trail than Obama has.
Posted by: stace at July 01, 2008 02:06 PM (JO0c/)
Posted by: noprisoners at July 01, 2008 02:18 PM (eqMup)
Posted by: nikkolai at July 01, 2008 02:45 PM (QtITZ)
I would not have believed that the Democrat party would actually pick a candidate that is worse than John F'n Kerry.
I would.
Remember: Carter, Mondale, McGovern, William Jennings Bryan ... George B. McClellan?
Lots and lots of practice.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at July 01, 2008 03:35 PM (AZwSr)
Given that Obama's "Chicago mainstream" pals are terrorist bombesr for the Weather Underground ...
Also [corrupt] political hacks of the [corrupt] Daley regime administration.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at July 01, 2008 03:38 PM (AZwSr)
This negative take on McCain's POW experience is really unbelievable.
Some time ago back I spent several years interviewing many survivors of the Bataan Death March and the Luzon Campaign of 194-42. Most belonged to the two battalions of the Provisional Tank Group that surrendered along with the rest of the Fil-American army when the Philippines fell to the Japanese. Those brave men underwent horrific experiences as prisoners of war. They were heroes in every sense. Their struggle to survive was as trying, if not more so, than actual combat (but, let's not forget, they were also combat veterans--like McCain, fighting to the very end, when Bataan was surrendered). The strength of character they developed and which enabled them to survive their captivity was extraordinary beyond measure. I hold McCain in equal regard.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at July 01, 2008 03:50 PM (AZwSr)
Stoopid Dhimmicrats, trying to hit McVain in the strongest part of his political protfolio. I suspect if those people were around back in the day they would be claiming that Grant wasn't a real soldier 'cause he wasn't at Gettysburg, and Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a real soldier 'cause he only led a charge up 1 Spanish-occupied hill. Whatever.... Sorry, oh Dhimmicrats, you guys are all a bunch of appeasenik losers, everybody knows it, and trying to prove the Republicans' man a non-hero, despite his very real heroic status, is not helping your position any. If anything, it is reminding a lot of unhappy Republican voters why they were happy to see John "winter soldier war hero" Kerry lose in '04. Yeah, keep working that angle, McCain in '08 thanks you for it.
Posted by: exdem13 at July 01, 2008 04:08 PM (fenBi)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 01, 2008 05:51 PM (dcqty)
The man is Naval Air all the way. The first strike on Iran by McCain will be F-22's off a carrier, bet on it.
And maybe then a B-2 or F-117 bomb run, just to mollify the Air Force brass. And some cruise missiles from cruisers and frigates and subs, to make the rest of the Navy happy. And Osprey flights of Marines to secure the US embassy in Tehran before the surrender documents are signed. The ground pounders will act as advisers to the Iraqi military guarding one border, and the Afghan army guarding the other. The Turks, they can guard their own border just fine without us watching, thank you very much.....
Posted by: Mikee at July 01, 2008 07:53 PM (wlcls)
Are there still people out there who buy this narrative BS that the democrats are helpless victims of the right wing smear machine?
Yes, and they are legion!
Posted by: disgruntled Pirate fan at July 01, 2008 07:57 PM (blNMI)
Posted by: memomachine at July 01, 2008 08:29 PM (VFHt1)
With the "gold" standard of 18% pretty darn clueless, this certainly renders the 'Obama is a Muslim' meme pretty darn moot.
How many believe 9/11 was an "inside job" ?
Posted by: Neo at July 02, 2008 03:55 AM (Yozw9)
Posted by: MarkD at July 02, 2008 07:01 AM (MMy4A)
Posted by: iolanda at September 30, 2009 01:58 AM (YgE7Y)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









