April 30, 2009
— Open Blog Just reported on Fox News about a minute ago. It's not really "breaking" news since it was widely expected they'd take this path. More details as they are released.
Update: CNN story here.
Posted by: Open Blog at
03:17 AM
| Comments (215)
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: memomachine at April 30, 2009 03:19 AM (WXcTw)
Posted by: Entropy at April 30, 2009 03:20 AM (m6c4H)
Posted by: torabora at April 30, 2009 03:23 AM (yPznK)
Posted by: MES41067 at April 30, 2009 03:23 AM (VmAoa)
"Posted by guest Apr 30, 2009 9:16AM So let me get this straight - the UAW, unsecured creditors, get 55% of the company and secured debt holders get 10% of a company ran by the UAW (which is basically worth zero point nada)? And somehow debtholders are being scolded for not going along with this flagrant violation of contract and bankruptcy law? Why do we even have a judicial system anyway?" http://tinyurl.com/c5hwmf
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 03:25 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: Buck Ofama at April 30, 2009 03:26 AM (eu7/X)
Who says Barry's not in charge at Chrysler?
April 30 (Bloomberg) -- Chrysler LLC will proceed today with a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing to reorganize into a more viable carmaker, an Obama administration official said.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the failure of some small creditors to agree to a final settlement is prompting the bankruptcy option. President Barack Obama will speak at noon New York time on the auto industry, the White House said in a statement today.
The presidents staff plans to use the filing to pave the way for Fiat Spa to take a 20 percent stake in the Auburn Hills, Michigan-based automaker, people familiar with the situation said. If Chrysler has to go through bankruptcy, it wont take long, Obama said yesterday.
Hugo Obama thinks he runs every company now.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 03:26 AM (1Jaio)
I would comment on this, but I have no idea where Crysler is going. I suspect the boneyard. They should have filed months ago, along with GM. Before wasting billions in tazpayer money. Good money after bad, with no way to succeed.
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 03:26 AM (OlN4e)
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the failure of some small creditors to agree to a final settlement is prompting the bankruptcy option. President Barack Obama will speak at noon New York time on the auto industry, the White House said in a statement today.
I'd sooner listen to a mule fart. Just as informative, and less offensive.
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 03:28 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 03:32 AM (1XErj)
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 03:34 AM (3PqHz)
GM and Chrysler, under the new ownership structure devised by the President, will not be companies of any impact. They may as well build Michelles, or Sashas, or Edsels, for that matter.
GM will also cut 21,000 hourly jobs in the U.S. by 2010 7,000 more than what the company outlined just two months ago.
GM and Chrysler will be kept alive only so that they can launder money on behalf of the federal government. Rather than having the federal government bail out the unions and their unsustainable legacy costs directly if the companies were allowed to fail, better to keep the car companies barely alive and funnel the cash through them. The companies pay the cost of benefits, so taxpayers dont realize that were footing the bill.
Thats right. The UAW will have a controlling interest in Chrysler while FIAT gets a one-third interest. At GM, things will be worse.
Combined, the union and government would own 89 percent of the century-old automaker, which has been bleeding red ink and is saddled with more than $62 billion in debt.
The government is controlled by Democrats, who have long been partners with the unions. The Obama administration and the Democrats are the same thing.
Wholl be designing the cars? Why not Barack himself, who will be well positioned to instruct the manufacturers on mileage requirements, design features, and even the model names.
Posted by: sickinmass at April 30, 2009 03:34 AM (/i4dU)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 03:35 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: B.0. the magician at April 30, 2009 03:35 AM (/Mla1)
13 With the 15th choice in the 2009 draft, the Cleveland Browns take Janet Napolitano, nose tackle, Arizona.
Wow, the Browns may actually have a shot this year.
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 03:37 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: In Exile at April 30, 2009 03:37 AM (8nOHU)
Posted by: Techie at April 30, 2009 03:37 AM (QYuCD)
Posted by: Ken at April 30, 2009 03:37 AM (3rbzb)
The U.S. as we all knew it has ceased to exist, we're now a communist state.
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 30, 2009 03:37 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: shunha7878 at April 30, 2009 03:39 AM (/DeBx)
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 03:39 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: Dave at April 30, 2009 03:41 AM (Xm1aB)
Dow up 100??? What do they know that we don't?
Posted by: Techie at April 30, 2009 03:43 AM (QYuCD)
Dow up 100??? What do they know that we don't?
Barry probably just dumped a ton of taxpayer money into it.
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 03:44 AM (/Mla1)
Dow up 100??? What do they know that we don't?
Posted by: Techie at April 30, 2009 08:43 AM (QYuCD)"
Yesterday CNBC trotted out a guy who siad "in this market, don't fight the tape"
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 03:45 AM (zplc6)
Chrysler is waiting for Big Daddy's okay
Chrysler is expecting the Obama administration to say today whether the company has met all of its requirements to go ahead with the proposed Fiat alliance with Fiat, Chief Executive Officer Robert Nardelli said in a note to employees.
I dont think there should be a stream of subsidies to automakers, but helping them to restructure now, when sales have collapsed, is realistic, Obama said.
It's realistic for complete control there Hugo.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 03:46 AM (1Jaio)
19This isn't a bankruptcy, it's a seizing and redistribution of assets. Straight out of the Marxist playbook.
The U.S. as we all knew it has ceased to exist, we're now a communist state.
Mr. Straights, I don't think you're quite on board yet with the new situation. Now if you'll please accompany me, we've set up a new blog where we can, shall we say, "adjust" your way of thinking on these matters.
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 03:46 AM (1XErj)
Can someone tell me again what we got for the Billions of taxpayer dollars we have dumped into this money pit?
Is anyone doing a pool on when GM follows suit? I'll take three weeks from next tuesday...
Posted by: Gerry Owen at April 30, 2009 03:48 AM (oGv5F)
genghis!
Good to see you are alive and at your keyboard. Some of us were worried when you failed to show last night.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at April 30, 2009 03:51 AM (wgLRl)
April 30 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. consumer spending declined more than forecast in March after a two-month spurt, ending an unexpectedly strong quarter on a soft note and signaling any economic recovery will be gradual.
I like how Bloomberg sticks to the script. Consumer spending down more than expect? Bloomberg's answer: Barry's recovery will be gradual. If it was a year ago then the story would be how the US was never getting out of the depression that Bush created.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 03:51 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 03:52 AM (3PqHz)
Posted by: Robert at April 30, 2009 03:53 AM (cd6Ip)
Posted by: A Lock of Che Guevara's Chest Hair at April 30, 2009 03:53 AM (/Pw+r)
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 03:53 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: ThomasD at April 30, 2009 03:53 AM (9DNw+)
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 03:54 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse at April 30, 2009 03:55 AM (AVYqB)
Posted by: Sexypig at April 30, 2009 03:55 AM (svl8C)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 03:56 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: flooflyparisparamus at April 30, 2009 03:56 AM (LLc3+)
On Fiat, at my last command in Italy, our partol cars were Fiat Puntos. Small, no power, but okay I guess. Some of the midsize Fiats are actually pretty damn nice, like cheap BMWs.
I want a Fiat Unicorn, you know they're coming.
Posted by: navycopjoejoe at April 30, 2009 03:57 AM (uRslG)
Posted by: Techie at April 30, 2009 03:57 AM (QYuCD)
If Barry wanted to act in the "national interest", he would already have announced his resignation. And rebuffed the American Electorate for being fools, idiots, and wanting to be taken care of by someone else. We have become a nation of little children looking for surrrogate parents to take care of us.
/fuck that
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 03:58 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 04:01 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: alexthechick at April 30, 2009 04:01 AM (SHHaV)
Posted by: RiteWingFascist at April 30, 2009 04:01 AM (1hSHv)
/sarc
At least if we simply set money on fire, we could derive some heat from it, now it's just going to go up in smoke. The vanishing dollar, its like magic, but without the entertainment.
Posted by: Dan F at April 30, 2009 04:02 AM (X69s8)
Posted by: apotheosis at April 30, 2009 04:03 AM (xWk3U)
Posted by: estee at April 30, 2009 04:04 AM (xlYqZ)
The unions haven't taken over Chrysler or GM. Chrysler filed bankruptcy because bond holders rejected that deal, which was orchestrated by Obama. I think that bankruptcy is the best chance now for both Chrysler and GM to avoid complete nationalization or ownership by the UAW.
Posted by: slatz at April 30, 2009 04:05 AM (mE0Rl)
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 04:06 AM (zplc6)
I don't have an exact accounting but I think it was around $4 billion, which was just below the threshold set in the failed "bonus bill" by Congress. (They tailored the amount of the bill to ensure that Chrysler was ignored when it came to bonus outrage.)
Since then, they turned down at least $750 million in loans because of bonus concerns for execs.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 04:06 AM (ixT7j)
Unions should be allowed, I suppose, and managers should be allowed to tell them to go fuck themselves. Why in the hell are we handicapping businesses with 1930s era union legislation? It is wholly unnecessary, there is enough workplace legislation to protect workers these days. So where is the debate on unions?
Toyota was offered $800 million by Alabama to set up a plant there. They went to Ontario, Canada, instead, who were only offering $400 million. Healthcare only explains part of it, demographics explains the rest.
On a per-hour basis French workers are more productive than American workers. That really shouldn't be the case folks. Time to go union bustin'.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 04:07 AM (DJjeC)
Posted by: Lee Iacocca at April 30, 2009 04:08 AM (LLc3+)
Posted by: RiteWingFascist at April 30, 2009 04:09 AM (1hSHv)
Where are T dub & honest clod?
I need them to explain to me the magnificent manner in which The Won has dealt with this problem.
Posted by: Tinian at April 30, 2009 04:10 AM (70sTG)
Posted by: Tommy V at April 30, 2009 04:11 AM (/PwQS)
Posted by: Roy at April 30, 2009 04:11 AM (cB77O)
56
Where are T dub & honest clod?
I need them to explain to me the magnificent manner in which The Won has dealt with this problem.
I'll stand in for them for a moment...
"Bush got us into this mess, if Obama wouldn't have stepped in when he did things would be even worse. If you weren't a redneck wingnut knuckledragger you'd understand."
Notice I didn't actually present any facts while blindly following The Won, and I closed out the sentence by dismissing your opinion. Seem accurate?
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 04:13 AM (/Mla1)
On a per-hour basis French workers are more productive than American workers. That really shouldn't be the case folks.
Don't worry. It isn't.
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 04:16 AM (VW9/y)
We will need more cars now that Biden has warned everyone not to take subways, planes, trains......
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 04:17 AM (3PqHz)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 04:17 AM (L64A6)
57 I have yet to meet a person who has actually bought a Chrysler.
Seriously. I have no idea who buys those cars, and clearly not many people do.
I don't mean that as snark.
There has been at least one jeep in my driveway since 1983. And there have been as many as three. Jeep is a Crysler product.
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 04:18 AM (OlN4e)
We will need more cars now that Biden has warned everyone not to take subways, planes, trains......
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 09:17 AM (3PqHz)"
Posted that to another thread, so my friends aren't playing me? it's true?
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 04:18 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: scout finch at April 30, 2009 04:19 AM (kua3P)
So its going to cost us to keep them out of bankruptcy, then cost us when they go in to it anyway.
Yes, now shut up
Posted by: Barack Iacoca at April 30, 2009 04:20 AM (uj/0b)
We are on Jeep number three. No complaints here other than a pretty bad blind spot in the '07 Grand Cherokee.
Posted by: scout finch at April 30, 2009 04:21 AM (kua3P)
Posted by: publicserf at April 30, 2009 04:21 AM (loRWh)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 04:21 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: Techie at April 30, 2009 04:21 AM (QYuCD)
Posted that to another thread, so my friends aren't playing me? it's true?
Yes, but he's backtracked. And much of what he said originally was unintelligible anyways.
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 04:22 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: gm at April 30, 2009 04:22 AM (koK9l)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 04:24 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: sears poncho at April 30, 2009 04:24 AM (uj/0b)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 04:25 AM (ixT7j)
Drudge has a article up about MSNBC not being able to cover the rent at their Washington office. Another bailout coming?
John F-ing Kerry will get to it as soon as he bails out the Boston Globe
Posted by: scout finch at April 30, 2009 04:26 AM (kua3P)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:28 AM (9bJJQ)
I have yet to meet a person who has actually bought a Chrysler.
We had a Chrysler Town & Country mini-van and it never gave us a problem. I loved it. We traded it for a Dodge Caliber a couple years ago, and so far I love the Caliber too (although I'd glady swap it for a Ford Edge). Jeep is part of Chrysler, too, as are Dodge Ram trucks and I see a lot of those.
Posted by: estee at April 30, 2009 04:28 AM (xlYqZ)
On a per-hour basis French workers are more productive than American workers. That really shouldn't be the case folks.
Don't worry. It isn't.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 04:29 AM (DJjeC)
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 04:32 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: ok ok at April 30, 2009 04:32 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 04:34 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: Syd B. at April 30, 2009 04:34 AM (phzv/)
I looked on Drudge and couldn't find it.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 04:35 AM (ixT7j)
I have yet to meet a person who has actually bought a Chrysler.
If they would go back and start manufacturing nothing but the 1969 426 ci hemi and put it in 1969 Chargers, Barracudas, and Challengers they would do good.
A rep from Consumer Reports was just on Fox and he said there were NO Chrysler products on their list of recommended cars because they were unreliable.
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 04:35 AM (f6os6)
There has been at least one jeep in my driveway since 1983. And there have been as many as three. Jeep is a Crysler product.
Same here. Currently I've got a '79 CJ7 and '04 Ram quad cab. I love that Ram...my favorite vehicle I've ever owned. The 5.7 litre Hemi is actually pretty poweful and the truck handles a little like a sports car (IMHO). (Though it still rides like a truck)
I'm a little worried about what happens in the future though when it comes time to trade it in.
I seem to recall that when Daimler was in acquisition talks with Chryser there was talk of spinning off the Jeep line or selling it to another automaker. In the end they kept it though. Who knows what Fiat will do with the Jeep and truck lines, but I suspect they'll still be around in some form in the future (unless they do something stupid such as renaming the trucks "Fiat Ram 1500." Do not want!
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 04:37 AM (1XErj)
BTW, according to the news, debt holders think they can get 60 cents on the dollar in banckruptcy vs the 30 cents that was offered in the "deal".
They would be fools to take the "deal".
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 04:37 AM (f6os6)
People holding secured debts, like bondholders, are typically moved to the front of the line in any bankruptcy proceeding and those with non-secured debts, like the UAW, are typically left grasping for crumbs after everything is distributed.
About the only way I see that changing is if the Feds agree to bout out the creditors for a greater percentage than they're likely to see from a bankruptcy. 10 cents on the dollar isn't going to cut it, though.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 04:38 AM (ixT7j)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:40 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 04:40 AM (ixT7j)
Posted by: Tommy V at April 30, 2009 04:41 AM (/PwQS)
Genghis
How many transmissions have you gone through? My older brother had a Jeep 4-wheel drive truck. He went through 3 transmissions within 4 years before he finally got fed up and got rid of it.
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 04:42 AM (f6os6)
Although we have not met, I introduce myself to you as a Chrysler T & C owner, albeit, somewhat begrudgingly. However, it is paid off and wholly owned by me. Yet, it is a piece of junk; but since I enjoy having no car payments, I will continue in this inanimate relationship. I blame Bush.
Posted by: G.W. McLintock at April 30, 2009 04:42 AM (ML9g8)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:43 AM (9bJJQ)
GM accepted the re-structuring put forth by the government where the union holds a majority stake, didn't they? Does this mean they still have the potential to go bankrupt? I assumed this meant GM has become another government money pit that will never die.
But this means Chrysler rejected the same deal, right? Except that somehow Fiat is going to get them instead. Be interesting to know who/what has the link to our government with Fiat.
Also, I'm not sure how it is possible to manipulate the market but I am firmly convinced that it is being manipulated so far today to go up. There is no possible way, given all the grim financial news, that the market should be up right now. (Of course I'm not a financial person, so maybe I'm wrong, but seriously, it is just extremely odd).
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 30, 2009 04:43 AM (AJ4xq)
genghis @ 86
Ram quad cab. I love that Ram...my favorite vehicle I've ever owned.
Your Ram pickup was the doing of Lee Iacocca (spelling?) whom Crysler could not wait to give the bum's rush as soon as he got them back in the black.
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 04:43 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:44 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at April 30, 2009 04:45 AM (LLc3+)
Bringing his nearly three decades of auto industry experience to bear on the probl...oh wait, never mind. He's a simpleton that negotiated some asbestos removal at some project housing one time, sort of.
Yeah, we got nothin' to worry about.
Posted by: buster mcDissenter at April 30, 2009 04:46 AM (PkxIz)
Hutch @ 94
94 The older Jeep "box cherokees" are still being made in Canada and are hugely popular in Europe. These are the ones with the bullet proof inline 6. They even have the Iveco diesel option for Canada and EU.
I had one. Best damn car I ever had. Select-Trac, drove 250 miles on black ice once. Wish I still had it, but son wrecked it.
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 04:47 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: MarkD at April 30, 2009 04:47 AM (MMy4A)
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 04:47 AM (f6os6)
Can't imagine I will every buy a GM or Chrysler product after this bailout crap. I would feel guilty knowing all of you guys helped me pay for it.
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 04:49 AM (L64A6)
@44, Yinzer- if you do find a place like the one you describe, can you let the rest of us know?
Posted by: buster mcDissenter at April 30, 2009 04:49 AM (PkxIz)
Posted by: Farmer_Joe at April 30, 2009 04:50 AM (z4es9)
Don't EVER backtalk Adriana Lima, she does her homework and you can take what she says to the bank
Adrianna Lima doesn't know what the fuck she is talking about.
Each U.S. worker produces $63,885 of wealth per year, more than their counterparts in all other countries, the International Labor Organization said in its report. Ireland comes in second at $55,986, ahead of Luxembourg, $55,641; Belgium, $55,235; and France, $54,609
Since Adrainna Lima chose 2007 statistics, so did JackStraw. And stop talking about yourself in the third person, it's creepy.
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 04:51 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 04:52 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 09:51 AM (VW9/y)
But the French work less hours, and Adriana was claiming they produce more per hour of work.
I have no idea what's true, and I find it hard to believe the French work harder, but that's what the actual statement was.
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 04:53 AM (/Mla1)
Do those Cherokees make it to the U.S.?
I've been searching for one - the last year they were produced here was 2001 so it's hard to find one with decent miles.
Posted by: scout finch at April 30, 2009 04:54 AM (kua3P)
The crew from Orange County Choppers is going to Alaska to build her a bike. Yeah, I know the OCC crew are clowns.
I rarely ever watch the show. But I will now.
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:54 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: MarkD at April 30, 2009 09:47 AM (MMy4A)"
Unless of course the law that the bankruptcy judge has to follow somehow morphs.
Posted by: powerrangers at April 30, 2009 04:55 AM (zplc6)
Dave at 22: Texas is a foreign country to Hill because W resides there. nuff said.
We have a Chrysler Town and Country and love it. Would I get another Chrysler? Not now, after this. Which is really too bad, because I would love to support American workmanship. But I have no desire to support the UAW, AFL-CIO, NEA (spit upon them) or any other back-busting union. We are inundated with Ladas, here in the former USSR satellite country, and they make interesting performance art by the sides of the road. Sadly, the new Government Mobile will likely have a lot in common with the Lada.
Posted by: mokimoki at April 30, 2009 04:57 AM (yI9fh)
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 04:59 AM (/Mla1)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 04:59 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse at April 30, 2009 08:55 AM (AVYqB)"
Doesn't it make you uncomfortable that this is not the only place "we" poured in cash?
Posted by: powerrangers at April 30, 2009 04:59 AM (zplc6)
But the French work less hours, and Adriana was claiming they produce more per hour of work.
Are you sassing JackStraw?! Nobody backtalks JackStraw!
They also get more done per hour than everyone but the Norwegians, according to a U.N. report released Monday, which said the United States "leads the world in labor productivity."
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 05:00 AM (VW9/y)
Dodge makes a fabulous diesel truck. We own an '05 extended cab (4 doors, but not a full sized rear seat) dually with a long bed and a Cummins Turbo diesel engine. It gets 22 mpg unloaded on the highway and gets 11 mpg pulling 25,000 # at 75 mph, with the air conditioner running (yes, we exceeded the manufacturer's recommended payload, and do so regularly - but the truck doesn't break a sweat).
Toyota can't come close to that, Odumbo.
Some of us morons work for a living and need trucks that do too.
I've had me some trucks, and I've had me some TRUCKS, and the Dodge we've got now is the best EVER. I hope Fiat doesn't completely screw up the truck division. We owned a Strada back in the '70s (an Arab Oil Embargo panic purchase) and it sucked out loud.
Posted by: The Other Coyote at April 30, 2009 05:00 AM (IDFhb)
Posted by: powerrangers at April 30, 2009 05:00 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: Tinian at April 30, 2009 05:01 AM (70sTG)
Posted by: scout finch at April 30, 2009 05:01 AM (kua3P)
Each U.S. worker produces eleventy bajillion dollars of wealth per year, more than their counterparts in all other countries, the International Labor Organization said in its report.
I'm sorry, I thought I was commenting at a smart military blog, not a stupid unionist blog. Like, fuck, seriously.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 05:01 AM (DJjeC)
What is Wall St. thinking? Dow Chemical reports 1Q profit drop of 90+%, consumer spending dropped and ExxonMobil 1Q profit fell ~50%, and now we hear about Chrysler biting the big one.
Dow up 100??? What do they know that we don't?
The market is up because I'm out. The minute I buy back in, it'll tank. The market knows.
Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at April 30, 2009 05:03 AM (0lz0I)
Following the lawsuits, the bondholders will get their money. TOTUS isn't dictator yet.
Barry is bigger than the law. All must bow down to his greater good.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 30, 2009 05:03 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 05:04 AM (DJjeC)
89Genghis you have a '79 CJ-7 Too? 304 w/ 3 speed stick?
It's got a 304, but other than that it's a very unusual CJ-7. It's actually an automatic. I bought it from an airman at Tinker Air Force Base in the late '80's. Before that at some point it belonged to a law enforcement angency (such as a sherrif's dept. or Border Control.) It'd been re-painted, but if you look at it at a certain angle, you can still faintly make out the outlines of the star decal. It's got one of those oddball Quadratrack trannies so I can switch back & forth between 2WD and 4WD. I've never really understood why they put it in the glove compartment though. So I have to park it and go 'round to the passenger's side to do the switcheroo.
It's actually got a pretty good punch at 0-60. Mostly it justs sits still though. One of the previous owners pulled out all the emission systems and replaced it with dual headers. Which was fine when I lived in Oklahoma, but when I moved to Seattle, the emission-Nazis told me I had to put all the emission controls back in order to get it licensed.
Oh, and the previous genius owner thought it'd be nice to cut a sunroof into the top. I thought it was kinda' novel when I bought it...that is until the first time I had to drive it in the rain. I must've used at least 5 tubes of caulk on it, but it still leaks like a sieve.
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 05:04 AM (1XErj)
But the French work less hours, and Adriana was claiming they produce more per hour of work.
Are you sassing JackStraw?! Nobody backtalks JackStraw!
They also get more done per hour than everyone but the Norwegians, according to a U.N. report released Monday, which said the United States "leads the world in labor productivity."
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 10:00 AM (VW9/y)
Yinzer didn't check the link. Yinzer acknowledges the confusion and regrets the mistake, but blames Bush.
Posted by: yinzer at April 30, 2009 05:06 AM (/Mla1)
OK, one theory about market going up, investors are seeing a company stand up to the govt. and they are responding to that?
Because doesn't it seem nicely timed that Obama gives a 100 day things are starting to get better speech and the next morning, sure enough, stocks are up, despite the swine flu situation, and Biden freaking New Yorkers out again before the White House could back track, and companies like Starbucks reporting huge losses, and the only reason some companies averted a quarterly report disaster was because of job cuts, and I could go on but I won't.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 30, 2009 05:07 AM (AJ4xq)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 05:07 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: Jeff Zeleny at April 30, 2009 05:07 AM (DvaIL)
Posted by: GarandFan at April 30, 2009 05:08 AM (C3okI)
Posted by: Marxism for the stupid americans at April 30, 2009 05:08 AM (YJZp/)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 05:09 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: powerrangers at April 30, 2009 05:09 AM (zplc6)
I'm sorry, I thought I was commenting at a smart military blog, not a stupid unionist blog. Like, fuck, seriously.
Seven years ago, French workers produced over a dollar more on average than their American counterparts. The country led the U.S. in hourly productivity from 1994 to 2003.
Dude, you got bitch slapped. Deal with it. Don't make JackStraw angry. You wouldn't like JackStraw when he is angry.
Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2009 05:09 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 05:10 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: Jeff Zeleny at April 30, 2009 05:12 AM (DvaIL)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 05:13 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: rockhead at April 30, 2009 05:14 AM (DvaIL)
Posted by: Dr Mabuse
Your recollection is faulty apparently. Scanning NRO for articles about the bailouts I find articles like this editorial Obama's Lemon.
"The farcical bailout of GM and Chrysler drew nearer to its inevitable end yesterday as Pres. Barack Obama started laying the groundwork for a blameless escape."
Another post on the Corner called the bailouts "insane."
Did you have a particular author in mind?
Posted by: Iskandar at April 30, 2009 05:14 AM (DFjVW)
Seriously. I have no idea who buys those cars, and clearly not many people do.
You'll note that the vast majority of Chrysler anecdotes from the rest of the morons is almost exclusively the non-Chry badges, Dodge trucks, Jeep SUVs etc.
As for actual Chry cars, I'll bet that their sales figures to individuals are pretty dismal. It's probably the fleet sales that have kept the car lines from losing even more money.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 30, 2009 05:14 AM (uwPRk)
Tinian...WTF? Did I forget my secret decoder ring?
I dunno -- you said it to me one time when I told you it was Polka Friday. Maybe I spelled it wrong.
Posted by: Tinian at April 30, 2009 05:15 AM (70sTG)
Why do liberals think that bondholders aren't people or groups of people(probably peoples pensions)?
Posted by: Girdyourloins! at April 30, 2009 05:15 AM (3PqHz)
Genghis
How many transmissions have you gone through? My older brother had a Jeep 4-wheel drive truck. He went through 3 transmissions within 4 years before he finally got fed up and got rid of it.
On the CJ-7 I had to get a rebuild once...completely blown out. Worse than that though, I cracked no less two engine blocks. The Chrysler 304 has some kind of oddball plug at the bottom of the oil pan and in both cases it failed without warning (thanks non-functioning dashboard indicator!). And I mean that literally: without warning. By the time I'd hear the cyliders starting to seize up, it was already too late. So that's another reason I parked it and got something else. (A Saturn...quit laughing...very sturdy and dependable, and at the time dependable trumped all)
The Ram's got a little trouble with the tranny right now, but not big trouble.
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 05:16 AM (1XErj)
Posted by: Iskandar at April 30, 2009 05:17 AM (DFjVW)
Because, to paraphrase one of their heroes, one person losing money is a tragedy but millions of people losing money is a statistic.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 30, 2009 05:17 AM (ixT7j)
So, is the chart of manufactoring jobs, or all jobs? Is it just GDP / total hours worked? Does french GDP include government papershufflers? Does ours? If I magically doubled ever manager's salary would this "productivity stat" go up, or down?
I find the chart interesting but I can't gleam much from it.
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:20 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at April 30, 2009 05:21 AM (/bqyT)
Posted by: robtr at April 30, 2009 05:22 AM (H60q6)
On the CJ-7 I had to get a rebuild once...completely blown out. Worse than that though, I cracked no less two engine blocks.
That makes me bless my 13 year old F-150. I have never done anything but change the oil etc.
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 05:25 AM (f6os6)
I'm guessing guest workers from Algeria and Turkey.
It's a similar situation with their army. The only consistently effective part of the French Army is the Foreign Legion.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 30, 2009 05:26 AM (uwPRk)
genghis!
Good to see you are alive and at your keyboard. Some of us were worried when you failed to show last night.
10-4 on that, you missed another hot pron night at Ace's place.
I think the girls are going to drive the traffic through the roof.
I could hardly get out of my bunk this morning.
Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at April 30, 2009 05:26 AM (qvT/A)
Gross domestic product at current prices in million US dollars
France: 2 077 954
US: 13 741 600
Euro: 10 431 703
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:27 AM (PD1tk)
Paranoid- my husband is a financial planner (26 yrs), which needless to say, qualifies him as "in the business" and he said all his tech info does not support the dow/s&p numbers right now. Last thing he said as he ran out the door. God. this has been the most nightmarish 2 yrs we've ever gone through. Up is down and down is up.
Posted by: Derak at April 30, 2009 05:29 AM (QIsMa)
Posted by: Salty Alaskan at April 30, 2009 05:29 AM (QohqE)
148 With the Federal Government getting involved in bondholder contracts I can't imagine anyone investing in corporate bonds any time soon.
THIS!
None of these financial shenanigans make any sense unless you assume the administration is going end-game on the whole capitalist economy thing. This damage can't be undone.
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 30, 2009 05:29 AM (Haq+B)
107 Everyone could trade their Crysler products for Land Rovers. They will do anything a jeep will do at only twice the price, and three times the breakdowns.
NOW that was good. Remember, the Land Rover was also a "Government" owned car before BMW then Ford bought them.
Kemp
Posted by: kempermanx at April 30, 2009 05:30 AM (qvT/A)
Posted by: Monty at April 30, 2009 05:32 AM (/0a60)
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:33 AM (PD1tk)
Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would not recommend taking any commercial flight or riding in a subway car at this point because swine flu virus can spread in confined places. A little more than one hour later, Biden rushed out a statement backing off.
I would tell members of my family and I have I wouldnt go anywhere in confined places now, Biden said on NBCs Today show.. Its not that its going to Mexico. Its [that] youre in a confined aircraft. When one person sneezes, it goes all the way through the aircraft. Thats me.
So, from my perspective, what it relates to is mitigation. If youre out in the middle of a field when someone sneezes, thats one thing. If youre in a closed aircraft or closed container or closed car or closed classroom, its a different thing.
That contradicted more restrained advice from President Barack Obama and the federal government and the last thing the White House wants to do right now is shut down the airline industry and big-city subways out of mass panic.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 05:33 AM (5r0Tz)
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:33 AM (PD1tk)
You want to see what the problem with Chrysler and GM is, read these two sentences.
Chrysler is only a fraction of its former self. It has about 39,000 U.S. employees, only about 40% of the total it had at the beginning of the decade.
It also has 65,000 U.S. retirees as well as their family members who depend upon the company for pension benefits and heath care coverage.
Chrysler is paying more former employees than current employees. How is any company supposed to function when 63% of its payroll costs are going to employees that currently produce nothing.
Posted by: Eric at April 30, 2009 05:34 AM (3f3uN)
Your Ram pickup was the doing of Lee Iacocca (spelling?) whom Crysler could not wait to give the bum's rush as soon as he got them back in the black.
And your point is? If you'd like, I'll try to set aside some time later today to feel guilty about whatever it is I should be feeling guilty about. Duzzat work for you?
132Genghis, you think it leaks now, try tilting the windshield down. Just once. You'll never get that seal again either. BTW...Quadtratrac is the best for off roading....Is there anyway you can get antique/classic/homebuilt/hot rod plates for it?
Nah. It doesn't even run now and it'd take a lot of money and time to get it running. Hell, the tires alone would cost me at least 1k to replace...it's been sitting so long in the elements that they've really deteriorated. Every summer I tell myself: "Self, this summer you're going to work on the Jeep." To which myself replies "Fuck you. I'm staying inside and playing video games in an air conditioned environment."
Maybe someday.
I was always suspicious of the Quadratrack control even working and so I was pretty much toodling around town in all-time 4wd. But I was pretty well convinced that when I shifted into Low 2 drive that thing could climb vertical walls.
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 05:34 AM (1XErj)
Posted by: Monty at April 30, 2009 05:34 AM (/0a60)
How appropriate that Fiat would be among the first foreign corporations chosen to partner with the new corporatist government entity in charge of American automobile production. Those rows of columns, the blind adoration, and all the theatrical pomp and bile of the Democrat ascendancy machine make all kinds of sense when placed in their intended context.
If so-called liberal anti-fascists had any integrity at all they'd poke their beady little eyes out with their master's barbed cock. Unfortunately they'd have to stop gobbling his rhetorical smegma first.
Posted by: monkeyfan at April 30, 2009 05:34 AM (cEE8N)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 30, 2009 05:35 AM (sKNox)
I'm not Uncle Buck, you are not Macauley Culkin, so kindly fuck off with the rapidfire blurting out of random questions, mmm-kay? We don't do that in the heterosexual community.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 05:36 AM (DJjeC)
"President Barack Obama will speak at noon New York time? What is New York time? Does each state have it own time now?"
New York time started on 9/11/01. Obama just lives in a different time zone.
Posted by: Roy at April 30, 2009 05:37 AM (cB77O)
Now... I see this as GOOD news, right? Chrysler's debt/bond holders rejected the POTUS/UAW restructure plan. This could very well be the opposite of what we were deriding a few days ago.
They "could" tear up all of their UAW contracts in bankruptcy, no? With Fiat to partner with, could they not slim down and go the non-union labor route? Well, probably not that far, but I think we've just moved from 55% UAW ownership to a very shaky position for the unions.
This is what GM should have done and still should do. Now , if I'm reading this right, we can support Ford AND Chrysler/Jeep. We'll see what is announced later on. I don't care for Chrysler so much, but Jeep is a decent line and deserves better management and product support.
Dude!
Posted by: Goin' to Vegas at April 30, 2009 05:37 AM (9PY81)
Posted by: Dan at April 30, 2009 05:39 AM (qfb86)
Dodge trucks. the best. we presently own 2 Dodge Rams (the little ones). and all our other vehicles are Chryslers. why? because of the sales & service of our local dealer.
there is not a local foreign car dealer anywhere near me.
Posted by: kelley in virginia at April 30, 2009 05:39 AM (g568/)
Genghis @ 162
And your point is? If you'd like, I'll try to set aside some time later today to feel guilty about whatever it is I should be feeling guilty about. Duzzat work for you?
My point is, Crysler gave the man who saved their asses the bum's rush. Same as the British got rid of Churchill as soon as they could after WW II was over. Gratitude!
/where did you get the idea that I thought you should feel guilty???
Posted by: maddogg at April 30, 2009 05:39 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:40 AM (PD1tk)
Fiat = Lada
Lada made its name in Western Europe selling the Fiat 124-based VAZ-2101 and its many derivatives as an economy car in large quantities during the 1980s, but subsequent models have not enjoyed the same success.
Posted by: Speller at April 30, 2009 05:41 AM (fh5Oy)
Hey, its your killer chart link. I'm just trying to figure out if is relevant to anything in this thread.
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 05:42 AM (PD1tk)
Along with the Fiat deal, the United Auto Workers ratified a cost-cutting pact Wednesday night. Treasury reached a deal earlier this week with four banks that hold the majority of Chrsyler's debt in return for $2 billion in cash.
But the administration said about 40 hedge funds that hold roughly 30 percent of that debt also needed to sign on for the deal to go through. Those creditors said the proposal was unfair and were holding out for a better deal.
"While the administration was willing to give the holdout creditors a final opportunity to do the right thing, the agreement of all other key stakeholders ensured that no hedge fund could have a veto over Chrysler's future success," said one of the administration officials.
A third person briefed on Wednesday night's events said the Treasury Department and the four banks tried to persuade the hedge funds to take a sweetened deal of $2.25 billion in cash. But in the end, this person said most thought they could recover more if Chrysler went into bankruptcy and some of its assets were sold to satisfy creditors. This person asked not to be identified because details of the negotiations have not been made public.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 05:43 AM (5r0Tz)
They "could" tear up all of their UAW contracts in bankruptcy, no? With Fiat to partner with, could they not slim down and go the non-union labor route?
No bloidy likely. Italians are big on Communism. It's very popular over there, and they have the largest Communist party membership roles of any non-Communist country.
Fiat is a Union car maker.
Posted by: Speller at April 30, 2009 05:44 AM (fh5Oy)
Interesting how I get trolled harder at "conservative" blogs for being conservative than I do at "liberal" blogs, not sure what's up with that. Look, I'm a consultant, and I will invoice your ass if you ask me one more question. Actually if you can't figure out how economic productivity and statistics are germane to a discussion on a Big 3 automaker about to declare bankruptcy I need you to kill yourself, now.
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 05:51 AM (DJjeC)
Posted by: Home of Joe Biden at April 30, 2009 05:52 AM (mN3EM)
"Italians are big on Communism." (176)
I get your point. At least the 55% UAW deal is dead and anything else is better IMO. I'm not anti-union ( I'm in one ) but the legacy costs of the UAW are a big part of the problem with the big three and up to very recently, they've been unwilling to modify what the retired folks are getting. That's been hurting the current employees on the line and the companies viability.
This will be interesting to see unfold and I just HOPE that the CHANGE that bankrupcy produces is more in line with free-market capitalism than marksist/statis governemnt control.
I hope Ford can hold on. Evidently GM bondholders aren't done trying to renegotiate their deal with TOTUS/UAW, but I think they're already too far in the tank with our dear leader to back out now.. GM is government motors.
Posted by: Goin' to Vegas at April 30, 2009 05:55 AM (9PY81)
Posted by: Derak at April 30, 2009 05:56 AM (QIsMa)
Posted by: lmg at April 30, 2009 06:00 AM (A/vgC)
Posted by: Dan at April 30, 2009 06:01 AM (qfb86)
WTF, I glad these investors held out. Why should anyone reduce what any corporation owes them. The Treasury demands - F**k off.
Posted by: MikeH at April 30, 2009 06:02 AM (LdYLm)
The CEOs of the Big Three are back on Capital Hill this morning testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, and Barney Frank at least seems sympathetic. The chairman said bankruptcy would be a disaster, given the current credit markets and todays dire job report, adding that the country is held hostage by the debate, the Detroit News reports.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:03 AM (5r0Tz)
El Duce: Chrysler failed because they did not build fuel efficient cars.
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 06:11 AM (f6os6)
I lurked and jerked. I was speechless.
First.Time.Evah!
Posted by: sickinmass at April 30, 2009 06:12 AM (/i4dU)
Fiat will save the day. with shitting tiny cars.
GREAT!
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:13 AM (5r0Tz)
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:14 AM (5r0Tz)
Don't claim to be some sorta economixal smart guy or nothin', but isn't there some kinda maxim stating that investment flows from the bond market to the stock market and vicey versey depending on economic events?
Assuming I'm even half right here, wouldn't money be fleeing the bond market today based on barky the clown's shenanigans? Might explain that stock market jump, I'm thinkin'.
Posted by: buster mcDissenter at April 30, 2009 06:14 AM (PkxIz)
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:15 AM (5r0Tz)
Does anyone actually believe this bullshit?
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:16 AM (5r0Tz)
what a fucking joke.
Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter at April 30, 2009 06:18 AM (5r0Tz)
You're not getting trolled, you're being challenged. If you consider having your premises checked "trolling", then scram, eh?
And here's a hint- the cutesy third person references to your kicky screen name aren't clever, they're tiresome and banal. Might be adding to the friction you're feeling round here.
Posted by: buster mcDissenter at April 30, 2009 06:19 AM (PkxIz)
Dude, the columns on that chart are good info, I'm just trying to figure out if GDP / total hours worked has any meaning re autoworker productivity.
Perhaps you would lower yourself to explain it.
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 06:20 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2009 06:27 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 06:28 AM (9bJJQ)
BTW....this is why we can't trust "the people" to handle their investments and bonds!
Social Security is the only, "safe, locked box", place to put it. Trust the Gov't to invest it in bankrupt car companies for you. Now, assholes!
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2009 06:31 AM (9bJJQ)
Posted by: mojo at April 30, 2009 06:34 AM (g1cNf)
Posted by: Goin' to Vegas at April 30, 2009 06:34 AM (9PY81)
Posted by: powerrangers at April 30, 2009 06:37 AM (zplc6)
Epic Fail.
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 06:39 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: ranger rick at April 30, 2009 06:41 AM (zplc6)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 30, 2009 06:44 AM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 10:36 AM (DJjeC)
Who fcuking made you the spokesmodel for the heterosexual community, Adriana?
You speak for no one but yourself.
Posted by: Lewis at April 30, 2009 06:44 AM (Y3uPw)
124 And as others have pointed out, I said GDP per hour worked, fuckstick, not gross GDP. The French take 3 hour lunches and work a 35 hour week - and they're still more productive, and have been for many years. How? How the fuck is that possible?
Posted by: Adriana Lima at April 30, 2009 10:04 AM (DJjeC)
You're going to act like an idiot who hasn't taken Econ101 so I'm going to treat you like an idiot.
You used 2007 numbers, no PPP "fagotry", the problem is that was during the the days of the overly strong Euro (around 3% more than today or about $1.50). I hate PPP when it's used to compare poor and rich countries but it is a much more reliable indicator when comparing developed nations.
Given your inability to do anything more than look at some charts that you have no idea how to analyze, I'm sure you're also aware that the marginal product of labor for each added hour of labor above some minimum is declining. To put that in terms you can understand, that means if someone works 20 hours they can produce say $20, but at 25 hours they produce $24, at 30 $28, 35 $32, 40 $36. The French work an average of 25 hours a week, Americans 35 hours so yes as I'm sure even you can figure out $24/25 is bigger than $32/35.
A key issue is would you rather live where every worker produces $32 or $24? The other important thing is despite working more hours which drops per hour productivity Americans still produce as much per hour if not more than the French.
In summary, you can stop worrying your pretty little brain about it, US workers are just fine.
Posted by: jarod at April 30, 2009 06:48 AM (A23Gx)
Posted by: toby928 at April 30, 2009 06:49 AM (PD1tk)
genghis!
Good to see you are alive and at your keyboard. Some of us were worried when you failed to show last night.
Oh...sorry. I meant to say thanks but got distracted. I tried to arrange for someone to fill in but Gmail screwed up the lines of communication. Thanks Gmail!
Overnight thread will make its triumphant return this evening with a fresh load of the usual shit I tack onto it, a ne animal sponsor and...(wait for it)...lace wigs!
I look forward to continuing service as your overnight pinata.
(Apparently, with no overnight thread available, you guys invaded Ace's last thread of the night. He's been leaving me messages all morning telling me I'm responsible for all the damage as well as completely sanitizing and fumigating the place. And then there are all the strange spots and stains you guys left on the carpet. It's a little hard to tell though since on each succeeding message he gets a little more incoherent with rage.)
Posted by: genghis at April 30, 2009 06:51 AM (1XErj)
$8 BILLION to shut down Chrysler????
This really pisses me off. I am in the process of trying to get financing to OPEN a bar/pub, and it is damn near impossible to find a $150K for a start up business.
...And yet, we can flush $8 BILLION down the crapper to make a bankruptcy "easier"??? WTF is wrong with this picture???
On top of the BILLION$ we have already sunk into these defunct and morbid companies? Everyone knew they were going down the trail to bankruptcy years ago- I think they have had plenty of time to prepare!
Posted by: Gerry Owen at April 30, 2009 06:59 AM (oGv5F)
On a per-hour basis French workers are more productive than American workers. That really shouldn't be the case folks. Time to go union bustin'.
Alabama is a horrible example if the need to union-bust is your argument. Alabama is a Right-to-Work state. None of the 4 auto assembly plants here (+1 that is about 2 miles away from the AL state line in GA that draws a significant number of its workers and suppliers from AL) are unionized. And Toyota apparently liked AL enough to build its major V8 engine assembly plant here.
Posted by: Terry at April 30, 2009 07:06 AM (YIdck)
Posted by: Hazy at April 30, 2009 07:15 AM (1kwr2)
This really pisses me off. I am in the process of trying to get financing to OPEN a bar/pub, and it is damn near impossible to find a $150K for a start up business.
Dont you know; bars are not shovel ready.
Posted by: Vic at April 30, 2009 07:27 AM (f6os6)
You need to get out more, Vic.
Posted by: mojo at April 30, 2009 11:32 AM (g1cNf)
Posted by: Myron at May 30, 2009 07:34 PM (NNxYx)
Posted by: Mercedes-Benz at June 02, 2011 09:33 PM (xJe3c)
Posted by: hublot at April 23, 2012 04:14 AM (jAY8C)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









