November 02, 2009
— Dave in Texas It's an ass-whuppin.
Compare and contrast. Texas: lower taxes, holding up reasonably well in a bad economy, growing. California: our toll booth operators are better paid than yours.
Texas has usurped the leadership position that, decades ago, belonged to California. Today California is in decline, likely irreversibly so. William Voegeli draws the sad but instructive comparison in the Los Angeles Times:
In America's federal system, some states, such as California, offer residents a "package deal" that bundles numerous and ambitious public benefits with the high taxes needed to pay for them. Other states, such as Texas, offer packages combining modest benefits and low taxes. These alternatives, of course, define the basic argument between liberals and conservatives over what it means to get the size and scope of government right. ...California and Texas are not perfect representatives of the alternative deals, but they come close. Overall, the Census Bureau's latest data show that state and local government expenditures for all purposes in 2005-06 were 46.8% higher in California than in Texas: $10,070 per person compared with $6,858. ...
But what about improved public "services"? Better roads, schools...
Nope.
So what do Californians get for their higher taxes?
Better paid public employees, and more of em.
But those higher taxes in California must be going somewhere. Why aren't they benefiting those many thousands of citizens who are leaving the state for greener pastures?
In what respects, then, does California "excel"? California's state and local government employees were the best compensated in America, according to the Census Bureau data for 2006. And the latest posting on the website of the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility shows 9,223 former civil servants and educators receiving pensions worth more than $100,000 a year from California's public retirement funds. The "dues" paid by taxpayers in order to belong to Club California purchase benefits that, increasingly, are enjoyed by the staff instead of the members.
You know they're feelin good about that.
It's not a perfect contrast but it's a good one. For years states with higher taxes dismissed other states like Texas, Florida and South Carolina as ignoring the neccessity of of "excellent" public services like education and transportation. All bullshit of course, public services and infrastructure are no better or in many cases worse. Meanwhile policitians assaulted businesses as the "enemy" bled them with ever higher taxes and over-regulation, and the bureaucrats and the unions lined their pockets until the whole thing collapsed.
They say California sets the trend. I wish they were wrong. Whoever "they" are.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
04:38 AM
| Comments (172)
Post contains 428 words, total size 3 kb.
And no, no, no Texas is full of mouthbreathers. They can't be the future they just can't.
Posted by: Time Magazine at November 02, 2009 04:41 AM (aVQo/)
Posted by: 8 My Foot at November 02, 2009 04:43 AM (/yo7S)
Posted by: Wisconsin at November 02, 2009 04:45 AM (aVQo/)
Posted by: steevy at November 02, 2009 04:45 AM (xL/DW)
Posted by: 8 My Foot at November 02, 2009 04:47 AM (/yo7S)
Posted by: kefka at November 02, 2009 04:48 AM (n1uMU)
Posted by: Mjim at November 02, 2009 04:54 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Mjim at November 02, 2009 04:56 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Tom in Korea at November 02, 2009 04:57 AM (+gX1+)
What about me?
You. You are nothing. You are the thing we wear to keep our head warm.
We, on the otherhand, are the future.
Corrupt government..........check.
Large cesspool of a city......check
Single party rule driving us straight to the iceberg.....check
Plus, we have Roland Burriss. A politician so shameless that actually trying to buy a U.S. Senate seat results not in getting thrown out of office and charged with a crime, but you actually get the seat with no cash being exchanged.
Yea, we are the future.
Posted by: Illinois at November 02, 2009 04:59 AM (V9SYy)
I was just reading this -- and decided to refresh Ace to see if the top headlines thread was up.
My take on this: it's not about providing "services", it's about buying votes with jobs. I see it myself where I live. When the county is the largest employer in the county, the political machine that runs the county becomes unstoppable.
Posted by: Tinian at November 02, 2009 05:00 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:00 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: Mephitis at November 02, 2009 05:01 AM (ehXLT)
Posted by: Troll Feeder at November 02, 2009 05:02 AM (hTesA)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:03 AM (COZI9)
My Dad was career military. So, due to his assignments, I spent 8 years in California growing up. California is a wonderful state, if you could disappear the left wing imbeciles running the place, and about 2/3 rds. of the people who make the place insufferable. When he got the assignment to New Mexico, I was overjoyed. I've never been back to California in over 35 years.
Posted by: maddogg at November 02, 2009 05:03 AM (OlN4e)
And then the county goes bankrupt and people inevitably ask "why? what happened to the money?"
Posted by: Tom in Korea at November 02, 2009 05:04 AM (+gX1+)
And that's nothing if the Feds get health care and cap and tax passed.
Also at Power Line, a quote from Mark Steyn:
"The cap-and-trade bill recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, for example," Mark writes, "is a bold assault on property rights: in order to sell your home--whether built in 2006 or 1772--you would have to bring it into compliance with whimsical, eternally evolving national 'energy efficiency' standards, starting with a 50 per cent reduction in energy use by 2018. Fail to do so and it would be illegal for you to enter into a private contract with a willing buyer."
Posted by: Tinian at November 02, 2009 05:04 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:05 AM (9Pkrh)
Posted by: ParisParamus at November 02, 2009 05:07 AM (ReLJr)
Who knew?
Posted by: franksalterego at November 02, 2009 05:08 AM (GKyIE)
Posted by: Arnold "I won't be back" Schwarzenegger at November 02, 2009 05:09 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:09 AM (9Pkrh)
Posted by: nickless at November 02, 2009 05:10 AM (MMC8r)
Life ain't fair.
Posted by: cassandra at November 02, 2009 05:10 AM (FSgHo)
Posted by: torabora at November 02, 2009 05:11 AM (/0P69)
The very idea that the media would tell the truth about people who implement policies that media people agree with is laughable.
Posted by: Diogenes at November 02, 2009 05:11 AM (EOnG1)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:12 AM (9Pkrh)
I'm sure a business friendly climate has nothing to do with it .
Posted by: S.Carolina at November 02, 2009 05:13 AM (wb68R)
Posted by: fluffy. Masshole at November 02, 2009 05:14 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:14 AM (COZI9)
Posted by: katya at November 02, 2009 05:15 AM (RbvF+)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 02, 2009 05:17 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: cassandra at November 02, 2009 05:17 AM (FSgHo)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:18 AM (WvXvd)
32 I wish I was from Texas. Even with the humidity and fire ants.
You don't have to be in Tejas to enjoy fire ants. They have exported the surplus to Arkansas.
Damn you, Grunt...
Posted by: maddogg at November 02, 2009 05:18 AM (OlN4e)
You learn to live with the humidity and fire ants aren't that bad, I had a mound in my yard last year and sprinkled some Andro on it and they were gone.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:19 AM (9Pkrh)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:19 AM (COZI9)
You know we can point all the fingers we want to but this Republic depends on an informed and upright citizen taking his responsiblities as a citizen seriously. Alas we only have our selves to blame.
Not me. I'm informed and have attempted to inform those around me. To the point of being annoying at times.
Posted by: katya at November 02, 2009 05:20 AM (RbvF+)
Posted by: Billy Sims at November 02, 2009 05:20 AM (ngD76)
>>I seriously don't understand why government employees are allowed to unionize.
Mostly its b/c we work in a government setting, with political a-holes who would fire you in a heartbeat for your political views, if they could do so legally.
The unintended consequence is that the day-to-day running of government falls to the Civil Service, which is low-turnover. Vote all you want, we'll run the show, folks.
Posted by: Triumph at November 02, 2009 05:20 AM (lDdA/)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:21 AM (9Pkrh)
Let's just hope it doesn't turn out to be one of those "Hey , ya'll watch this shit " scenarios .
Posted by: S.Carolina at November 02, 2009 05:21 AM (wb68R)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 02, 2009 05:22 AM (HylJ6)
Oh, and school vouchers, hell yeah. break the teachers union.
I have always thought school vouchers were a great idea. Let the parents choose their kids' school and force the schools to be answerable to the parents and have to impliment changes to make themselves better instead of political and padding the union's pockets.
Posted by: katya at November 02, 2009 05:22 AM (RbvF+)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:22 AM (COZI9)
Posted by: Dean Tweet at November 02, 2009 05:23 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: katya at November 02, 2009 05:24 AM (RbvF+)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:25 AM (COZI9)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 02, 2009 05:26 AM (RkRxq)
As a person stuck in a Lib-leaning, spending addicted state, I wonder what can be done to turn the tide against the leaches. Must we all just sit and wait to be taxed out of house and home? After all, not everybody can move to Texas. What needs to happen to thin the herd of blood suckers in the slums and in the state government? It seems we've already reached critical mass - too many eaters and too few workers, and all the eaters vote.
Michigan has the balanced budget amendment that keeps the Libs in check to some degree by preventing accumulation of debt, but they're constantly pressing for more tax revenue while simultaneously cutting the normal government services every chance they get. Every time the budget gets tight, the totally predictable attacks on schools, police, fire departments, and roads begin. Never mind the state lottery, which supposedly pumps boat loads of cash into the schools (really just the general fund), the high property taxes for the schools (again, who knows where that money really all goes?), the gas taxes for the roads, the assessments, etc etc etc. Always they need more money to do less useful stuff. The only welfare-type item they ever offer up on the chopping block is the already modest aid for old folks homes, which I'm sure we could easily afford if it were not for all the other waste.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 02, 2009 05:26 AM (P+HSn)
Anyone else laugh when they see the commercial with Arnold saying "Come to California we are waiting"? I swear that crap cracks me up. One of the largest most prosperous states with a GDP larger than most countries, some of the best weather, more natural resources than most other states, and yet they are forced to beg people to move there in commercials.
Also I think by "we are waiting" they mean waiting to rob you but that might just be me.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 02, 2009 05:28 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 02, 2009 05:29 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:29 AM (COZI9)
Posted by: Diogenes at November 02, 2009 05:30 AM (EOnG1)
>> Rick Perry endorsed Algore for prez in 1988
I'm no defender of Perry, he's a pretty unimpressive gov (although a better choice than the other dorks running against him)... which I'm sure is why Hutchison is challenging him. Kay Bailey gets a bit squishy on the border from time to time, not good, but a net positive compared to Governor Goodhair.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:31 AM (WvXvd)
I don't think unions are as popular as progs think they are. Maybe they never have to deal with them at the coffee shop or university bookstore?
That's probably because this administration loves the squeaky wheel. The noisy few are the favored ones.
Posted by: katya at November 02, 2009 05:32 AM (RbvF+)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:32 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:33 AM (9Pkrh)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:34 AM (COZI9)
>>No ideas, no suggestions. You are a perfect representative of the Party of "No."<<
Mostly b/c any 'acceptable' suggestion always involves more government. All you've got is a hammer....
Posted by: Triumph at November 02, 2009 05:34 AM (lDdA/)
Posted by: AngelEm at November 02, 2009 05:35 AM (HCxZ0)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:36 AM (9Pkrh)
Of course, even it isn't possible for a 10 page comprehensive law, then just section off each idea as a separate vote/issue - I think people like that as well - and steal Obama's broken pledge to post stuff on the internet for 5 days before anything is signed. (That should also be an easy media hit on Obama, except the MSM lets him get away with that...)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 10:29 AM (COZI9)
Actually, I'm not so sure that health care can't be done in 10 pages: just set up a system of vouchers that allow poor people to buy private health insurance. Kinda like how food stamps works. I think they could do that in 10 pages.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 02, 2009 05:37 AM (OtQXp)
>>I personally know two democrats who are against that [gov unions], one a government employee.
Doing away with them would be worse, I think. You'd have County = Repubs, State = Dems, etc. and no crossing of the streams, as it were. What they need to do is outlaw political contributions from governement employee unions.
Posted by: Triumph at November 02, 2009 05:38 AM (lDdA/)
Just to be clear, Dave-in-Texas, but South Carolina is one of the "worst of both worlds". Not only are gov't services low, but UNLIKE Texas and FL, taxes are quite high.
In general property taxes are low, but state income tax is 7% (which is higher than say, Taxachussets), and the state sales tax is 7% with a 1% tax on food. Yup, I pay more taxes in SC than I did before I moved from MA!
This is one of the reasons why pre-Brazillian mistress Governor Sanford was (once) popular, he slapped a veto on ever-more-egregious spending proposals in Columbia.
Posted by: son of the south at November 02, 2009 05:38 AM (KNy97)
Posted by: Militant Bibliophile at November 02, 2009 05:39 AM (bl4xn)
Posted by: AngelEm at November 02, 2009 05:39 AM (HCxZ0)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 10:34 AM (COZI9)
Texas is great! I've several friends that have moved down there.
Posted by: Diogenes at November 02, 2009 05:40 AM (EOnG1)
Lord, have mercy.
Posted by: franksalterego at November 02, 2009 05:40 AM (GKyIE)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 05:40 AM (COZI9)
Is Hutchison gonna win the primary?
And who will replace her in the Senate if she wins the governorship?
Posted by: Dean Tweet at November 02, 2009 05:41 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at November 02, 2009 05:42 AM (9Pkrh)
63 Fire ants suck. The humidity is horrendous.
Humidity? What's that? Way out in West Texas, it's brown and dry but we don't suffer like Houstonians or those poor batards who live in swamp country.
Fire ants do suck. I've had them crawl all the way up to my crotch and latch on. Burned like hell...That incident was even more intense than my many scorpion bites. Still - even fire ants are a lot better than Jerry Brown!
Posted by: TexasJew at November 02, 2009 05:43 AM (1doBx)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 10:31 AM (WvXvd)
I disagree. I think she's a damn Trojan Horse. Too long in the Senate, which is a cesspool of career RINOs
Posted by: TexasJew at November 02, 2009 05:47 AM (1doBx)
The latest poll I saw put Perry up by 10, but it's not even an active race yet. I don't know if she can win or not, if he wins then it ain't awful. His biggest fumble was on insurance couple of years ago, the rest of it has been steady.
No idea who will run for Kay's seat. Probably Willie Nelson.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:48 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: Dean Tweet at November 02, 2009 05:49 AM (z37MR)
Thing I like about Perry is that he seems to instinctly know that the less he does, the better he looks.
I like that.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 02, 2009 05:49 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: markytom at November 02, 2009 05:51 AM (S2usV)
uh, half of california is already here. It was pretty popular to sell their inflated priced houses and come here and buy land at actual market value before the housing bust.
And one other thing, we still got lead bullets and magazines that can hold more than ten bullets. Point is, are personal freedom is much less constrained by government.
Posted by: Artruen at November 02, 2009 05:52 AM (L+dBi)
Posted by: AngelEm at November 02, 2009 05:53 AM (HCxZ0)
Posted by: Brian Dennehy at November 02, 2009 05:53 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 05:53 AM (WvXvd)
I disagree. I think she's a damn Trojan Horse. Too long in the Senate, which is a cesspool of career RINOs
Posted by: TexasJew at November 02, 2009 10:47 AM (1doBx)
I agree with you.
Posted by: Diogenes at November 02, 2009 05:56 AM (EOnG1)
But what is worse is the way the Administrators blatantly violate the law. The Boards are drones. The DA's yawn. The pricks won't even buy their own coffee. The District's have become love nests of contractor/consultant/analists...We got a consultant who 'works' here 2 days a mo for $200K. He gives the Board advice. Our cooks make $8.50/hr. Administrators love lawyers. We now have 6 cases against the District. Two years ago $487000 was spent in a year on lawyers out of $12.5 million. It is Miss Management, and highly paid at that, that is wrecking Commiefornia.
I'm off to work to keep the classrooms warm for our welfare Kings and Queens. See Ya!
Posted by: torabora at November 02, 2009 05:59 AM (/0P69)
Posted by: rawmuse at November 02, 2009 06:02 AM (/pbE+)
Believe me, I envy you for your choices in the race.
Right now, up here, we've got 5 buffoons trying to out-liberal each other for Dead Kennedy's senate seat. Their debate was sickening, as each one of them tried to one-up the others liberal positions.
Posted by: Dean Tweet at November 02, 2009 06:03 AM (z37MR)
Well, you might have humidity and fire ants in Texas, but so do we here in FL. We also have nuisance alligators, pythons, monkeys and Alan Grayson.
So there!
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 02, 2009 06:09 AM (ZGhSv)
Texas has usurped the leadership position that, decades ago, belonged to California.
Who in the hell said CA had a leadership position? Not I
I always considered them the leaders in all the bad shit trends that were coming down the pike. They excelled at that. And....I can bad mouth the hell out of them because I used to live there.
As we used to say in the Navy...
CA, a good place to be FROM
Also, dont be too eager to include SC in those States who wish to remain capitalistic. We are rushing towards communism just s fast as MA, NY, and CA. Its just that our State workers are more stupid than the State workers in the other States. Our State income taxes are about the same as NY and MA, our property taxes as a percentage of house value are up there with them, and in the case of my locality, our sales taxes are actually higher at 10.5%.
Posted by: Vic at November 02, 2009 06:09 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: Sgt. Rock at November 02, 2009 06:18 AM (2jp4I)
We oughta refuse them entry at the El Paso border.
Posted by: Troll Feeder at November 02, 2009 10:02 AM (hTesA)
Lifetime voting records as the price of admission.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Meteor Summoner, Lover of Bacons at November 02, 2009 06:18 AM (erIg9)
You don't think the education issues both California and Texas face have anything to do with MILLIONS of Illegal Aliens who don't even speak English do you?????
NAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Posted by: Native Born Hoosier at November 02, 2009 06:20 AM (v4UYp)
As a native Texan, who has never lived anywhere else, I can say that I'd never live in another state unless nuclear fallout of some sort were involved. That said, there are definite problems with Texas government and prevailing demographics.
We've got 2 liberal Republicans running for governor, with Perry's watch being highlighted by a flourishing toll road system (remember when taxes used to pay for roads?), a broken campaign promise (I know, I know) over illegal immigration and border security, and a narrowly defeated massive land grab via emanent domain for the trans-Texas corridor.
Seems like the two surging populations (in my area at least) are illegal aliens and liberals that haven't learned not to shit in their nest. That points to a continual watering down of what conservatism remains in the Republican party, and a continuing increase in liberal policies being enacted.
On the other hand, we've got a LOT of guns and ammunition, so we got that going for us.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 02, 2009 06:21 AM (pZEar)
>> we've got 5 buffoons trying to out-liberal each other for Dead Kennedy's senate seat.
I know, and I'm not trying to nyah nyah you over it. It is what it is. Which is why I used to suggest, on occasion, that a moderately conservative R in Massachusetts is better than a Deval Patrick.
Except when I do that, I'm accused (by some, certainly not all) of spineless RINO cowardice, so I'll just shut up about it.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 06:22 AM (WvXvd)
Posted by: alamogirl at November 02, 2009 06:22 AM (vta31)
Posted by: texexec at November 02, 2009 06:22 AM (0YfkA)
Posted by: texexec at November 02, 2009 06:24 AM (0YfkA)
Posted by: Troll Feeder at November 02, 2009 06:25 AM (xibJw)
Reactionary, you have to find some way to get out of Michigan. There is, sadly, no hope left now - Michigan is now what Mississippu was in 1866, a failed backwater that is going to spend the next 100 years in poverty and obscurity. When Michigan votes to enact right-to-work laws, then there will be hope. When will that happen? Not anytime in the 21st century, that's for sure.
Posted by: wws at November 02, 2009 06:28 AM (T1boi)
The City of Houston may be bankrupt, but that isn't a worry to anyone outside the City of Houston, since the State has no intention of picking up the tab. Houston will have to take care of it's own problems, and if they do it badly then it just means that all the businesses moving into the state will relocate to DFW, Austin, San Antonio, or any of dozens of other good areas rather than Houston.
And that brings up the real point of this - as a Texan, California's failure just continues to guarantee that Texas has to go on creating the jobs that will provide for the housing and other requirements of 1544 more people each week - and these people tend to be refugees from high tax states who have HIGHER than average incomes, not lower.
California's pain is Texas' gain.
Posted by: wws at November 02, 2009 06:29 AM (T1boi)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson - veteran reporter at November 02, 2009 06:30 AM (OyaTi)
Texas is presently in remission but but chances are we will always be fighting the cancer that is liberalism. Our southern border counties are done for and just like any other state our urban centers are where the cancer begins.
Posted by: polynikes at November 02, 2009 06:30 AM (m2CN7)
I'm a native Texan who married a career Air Force man from PA. He may be yankee-born but he's a Texan at heart and, by marriage, has full-Texas rights. We've been stationed in Texas 3 times in 20 years and after spending 2 years in liberal-run Tucson, AZ, we got back to the Texas hill country as fast as we could to eventually retire.
That being said: Kay B-H has not officially declared her resignation as US Senator to run against Gov Perry. Officially she's a senior GOP Senator (albeit more a RINO than GOP), but she's still a senior GOP Senator. IF she does follow thru with her resignation to run for governor, Perry is very likely to pick current Texas Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams to replace Kay in the Senate then possibly run for election. He is heavily endorsed by conservative Republicans in the state and nationally and is a true conservative on big key issues. I've met him several times and he is true to his word. I'd much rather see him in the Senate, Perry re-elected, and Kay sent home to retire.
Posted by: Joycer at November 02, 2009 06:34 AM (WWTNl)
"Houston will have to take care of it's own problems, and if they do it badly then it just means that all the businesses moving into the state will relocate to DFW, Austin, San Antonio, or any of dozens of other good areas rather than Houston."
That's why George Mitchell of Mitchell Oil founded The Woodlands, up in Montgomery County just north of Houston, where all the oil people now live and work these days, and where all the large oil companies are now based.
Posted by: TexasJew at November 02, 2009 06:35 AM (1doBx)
Posted by: eman at November 02, 2009 06:37 AM (ZzgoC)
Posted by: Crusty at November 02, 2009 06:37 AM (GvSpB)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at November 02, 2009 06:38 AM (pZEar)
Yeah, the way we deal with that here is suburban sprawl populated with conservatives. Lib enclaves like Houston and Austin gots no place to spread and get outvoted in state and national elections.
That said, our representation is majority R, but not hugely so in the state house or DC.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at November 02, 2009 06:41 AM (WvXvd)
I've always said Californians don't deserve the state of California. They have the largest tax base and some of the highest taxes in the country, and the state is broke due to stupidity and expensive government programs. Illegal immigration is making ERs go broke and turned large parts of southern California into the Gaza Strip. Some of the richest farmland in the US is arid dirt now because of water mismanagement due to enviro-nut pressure, and the less said about San Francisco, the better.
Posted by: UGAdawg at November 02, 2009 06:42 AM (thedx)
Posted by: Y-not is apparently somewhat lacking in ideological purity at November 02, 2009 06:43 AM (sey23)
Posted by: sexypig at November 02, 2009 06:43 AM (COZI9)
MY STATE RIGHT OR LEFT!
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at November 02, 2009 06:49 AM (tPZUr)
Posted by: naturalfake at November 02, 2009 06:52 AM (ao5cQ)
Fire ants, killer bees, rattlesnakes, tornados.
Scary things thrive in Texas. Liberal politics is not one of them!
We have all of those plus water moccasins scorpions black widow spiders AND Lindsey Graham! So our crapiness beats the hell out of your crapiness.
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 06:55 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: John ryan at November 02, 2009 06:57 AM (m0Q2u)
Texas has about a 20% higher rate of people living below the poverty line I think that is a significant fact Dave
I guess the solution to that is for TX to load that 20% and send them back to Mexico or to CA then.
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 07:03 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: Tweet beats dead horses at November 02, 2009 07:05 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: John Ryan at November 02, 2009 07:10 AM (fDWFP)
So what do Californians get for their higher taxes?
Better paid public employees, and more of em.
Better subsidized illegal aliens too!
Posted by: Curmudgeon at November 02, 2009 07:11 AM (ujg0T)
Yea, we are the future.
Posted by: Illinois at November 02, 2009 09:59 AM (V9SYy)
To misquote a famous Chicagoan "You are the ones we've been waiting for"?
Posted by: runningrn at November 02, 2009 07:13 AM (qP2BK)
Posted by: kefka at November 02, 2009 09:48 AM (n1uMU)"
Because Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law before he left office last time that made it mandatory. We had to file a suit in federal court (and we won) to stop the union from taking all our "fair share" fees even though we refused to join.
Posted by: PJ at November 02, 2009 07:16 AM (Qpxxz)
197 bucks a week isn't much these days, but in the '60s it was a damn sight better than my E5 pay.
Oh yeah, he said he would keep the job after his parole.
Posted by: Joseph Brown at November 02, 2009 07:16 AM (dov+8)
Posted by: Hetlau at November 02, 2009 07:17 AM (RZDTZ)
Persons per square mile, 2000
For whatever reason the only metric that matches the national average is ppl/sm.
If you took the pharmaceutical apparatus of NJ (which is I think one of the larger in the country) and transferred it to Texas it would be an order of magnitude more efficient. Just removing the cronyism alone would free up the necessary CYA-or-they'll-destroy-us campaign money.
I think ya'll Texans, in so far as you'll be able to control your political future, should attempt to snatch as many businesses from other states as possible and shield them from the looter wildfires.
TX
79.6US
79.6
Posted by: MRI at November 02, 2009 07:19 AM (aVQo/)
Posted by: MRI at November 02, 2009 07:19 AM (aVQo/)
103
I look at Dallas back in 1984 and compare it to today and the difference is stark. It's turned left for sure. We've got a lesbian sheriff! (not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posted by: Reggie1971 at November 02, 2009 07:20 AM (OyaTi)
We have all of those plus water moccasins scorpions black widow spiders AND Lindsey Graham! So our crapiness beats the hell out of your crapiness.
Please, piker. Have you seen me.....or my hair. Plus, Illinois is the home of the Reverand Jesse Jackson and Jesse Jackson, Jr. And did I mention my hair.
Posted by: Blago at November 02, 2009 07:21 AM (V9SYy)
Posted by: MRI at November 02, 2009 07:23 AM (aVQo/)
Posted by: Militant Bibliophile at November 02, 2009 10:39 AM (bl4xn)
WA isn't much better. We're like Oregon-Lite. We usually do whatever you guys do, just a few years down the road. The only thing we don't have is a state income tax (although, they keep trying to sneak one in). Bill Gates Sr. is a big proponent of a stated income tax. Our sales tax is amost 10% in King County. One of the things that drives me absolutely nuts is when I'm driving down the freeway and see sculptures of salmon, or concrete stamped with trees or other such nonsense. (1/2 of 1% of all state funded new construction must be used for art). That and those ridiculous, huge stimulus signs or the "Your nickel at work" signs (since we voted ourselves an increase in our gas tax) make my blood boil. Oh, and our gas costs more up here, and you have to pump it yourself (unlike OR). Not that I mind pumping my own gas, but to have it cost more when you are doing the labor is annoying.
Posted by: runningrn at November 02, 2009 07:26 AM (qP2BK)
"It's cities vs. not-cities, not State vs. State.
Look at the Presidential election maps by county.
Blue cities are the problem, not blue States"
Bingo. This is pretty much true in here in California, too.
I used to be a big supporter of missile defense.
Not so much anymore.
Posted by: RayJ at November 02, 2009 07:31 AM (YcjCJ)
(Peering down his nose), Texas? That ends in the letter "s". It must be one of those little islands off the coast of Greece. I've never been there!
Posted by: Charlie, I'm smarter than you, Gibson at November 02, 2009 07:31 AM (qP2BK)
Harrumph! Texas already has a corrupt liberal Republican governor. Why would we want to trade him in for the same thing with a skirt?
Posted by: John Galt at November 02, 2009 07:32 AM (F/4zf)
Sad but true. Cali is in the shitter. And the new 10% 'loan' they are now taking from us is only accelerating the diaspora of productive people out of state.
How to fix it? Crush the state employee unions with reps that have the balls to stand up to them. Agressively remove the herds of illegals that are draining every public service as fast as they can. The districts will be redrawn from the current gerrymandered mess in, um, 2012, I think. Then we may have a chance to turn this around.
Posted by: HoundOfDoom at November 02, 2009 07:39 AM (MUloE)
Please, piker. Have you seen me.....or my hair. Plus, Illinois is the home of the Reverand Jesse Jackson and Jesse Jackson, Jr. And did I mention my hair.
Hah, We shut down the best AF base in the country at Myrtle Beach so the top brass no longer have a good place to fly to for their required proficiency hours and our lying governor, although a good guy conservative, flys out to pork a girl from Argentina rather than giving our own local hos a chance.
So neener neener neener
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 07:44 AM (CDUiN)
Hey, BTW Asswipe maybe preacher Jesse Jackson is actually FROM South Carolina.
So double neener to you
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 07:46 AM (CDUiN)
In (a weak) defense of Perry, he has gotten more conservative every year, so maybe he's 'getting it'. Still, it sucks that we don't have a better candidate...
But hey, I remember Ann Richards doubling my property taxes with Robin Hood school funding, so it could be worse.
Posted by: Countrysquire at November 02, 2009 07:51 AM (e910j)
Posted by: GarandFan at November 02, 2009 07:52 AM (ZQBnQ)
Oregon doesn't have one either, not because of the constitution, but because we've never had one and the voters just hate the idea. Dunno why, this state votes blue, but any proposed sales tax that shows up on the ballot from time to time usually loses by 60-70%.
Posted by: OregonMuse at November 02, 2009 07:54 AM (eR37w)
So our crapiness beats the hell out of your crapiness.
I have 3 words for you: Senator Al Franken.
The Minnesota delegate rests it's case.
Posted by: Darury at November 02, 2009 07:57 AM (bITsg)
Posted by: Todd (the guy who is back to saying obama swallows) at November 02, 2009 07:57 AM (LLOGQ)
Posted by: toby928 at November 02, 2009 07:59 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Texas Pete at November 02, 2009 08:03 AM (giU14)
Sub school , minesweepers ,shipyard , and Desron 10, all gone .
They prolly moved all that good stuff into Dodd's district . Cuz they loves the military up there in the northeast .
Posted by: S.Carolina at November 02, 2009 08:04 AM (wb68R)
Or they'll have a story of how the low-tax states failed to provide this or that government service deemed necessary to several poor, helpless souls.
The plural of anecdote is data, you see.
Posted by: jimmuy at November 02, 2009 08:07 AM (EzcbY)
Posted by: clueless in CA at November 02, 2009 08:09 AM (wAQA5)
Hey Vic , you forgot to mention the closing of the Charleston naval station .
I was saving that for another post and now you have gone and spoiled it.
Besides, who is this Vic dude? An obvious sock puppet troll.
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 08:10 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 02, 2009 08:13 AM (yw4E4)
But... but... we've got Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Henry Waxman, Maxine Waters, Pete Stark, Sam Farr, Jane Harman, Loretta Sanchez, Gavin Newsome, and a bunch of cool Hollywood people...
But we have blue laws and you can not go shopping before 1:30 pm on Sunday and you can not buy beer at all on Sunday!
And we have James Clyburn, Nanny Nans bestest friend!
Posted by: SC another good place to be FROM at November 02, 2009 08:25 AM (CDUiN)
So how does the state raise revenue? What kind of public services does it operate?
I've got progressive Chicago friends that are always raving to me about "what Oregon is doing" for every model city planning idea. They never mention that Oregon has no state income tax.
Posted by: WTFCI at November 02, 2009 08:31 AM (GtYrq)
Posted by: wws at November 02, 2009 11:28 AM (T1boi)
Alas - I suppose you're right wws. It's a shame, given all that this chunk of land has to offer. But based on what I'm seeing in this thread, I'm concerned that there may not be anyplace in the US left to escape to with positive long-term prospects.
I've got my expatriate retirement nation picked out, and am working on financing the escape plan, and I'm planning to start moving dollars off shore and into other currency ASAP. Learning Spanish is, for me, slow and annoying, but I'm working on it. Are any other Morons here planning to flee the US and all this insanity? Or are you all chained down with kids and such?
Posted by: Reactionary at November 02, 2009 08:37 AM (P+HSn)
Shitty crumbling roads
Terrible crime and gangs
Beaches too filthy and crime-ridden to visit
Shitty parks full of litter
Hippies
Graffiti everyfrigginwhere (I favor a choice of amputation of one arm and one leg or castration for 2nd graffiti conviction)
San Fransicko and all that it entails
Billboards, signs, and forms in Spanish
Babysitting millions of illegal children at school until they are old enough to work or go to jail
Worst traffic in the country
Hollywood septic tank celebrities and their opinions
At least we get to provide a bunch of fat-assed, brain-dead cubicle rats a good salary.
Posted by: sifty at November 02, 2009 08:41 AM (wr1Lf)
mainly due to the arrogance of the the teachers union and pol's desire to maintain their little fiefdom.We have high schools building convention centers here,they also maintain in many cases their own police dep't. Schools have no business building anything but classrooms and if they need police,let the county sheriff hire them and assign them to school security.Also people should be very suspicious of school construction projects that largely benefit only a
small number of contractors, over and over again.
Our government is corrupt from top to bottom,and only we can change it if it is not already too late.
Posted by: Major "King" Kong at November 02, 2009 09:15 AM (E7i+5)
Oh yeah?? We brought you Joe Biden!!! Well, us and Scranton that is.
And we have 18 entire miles of I-95 traversing our state. For which we charge each motorist $4.
Fear me. Fear my stench.
Posted by: Delaware at November 02, 2009 09:20 AM (1O93r)
And we have 18 entire miles of I-95 traversing our state. For which we charge each motorist $4.
Oh yeah, well we have the only section of I-95 that is still only 4 lane AND they are getting ready to change it to a toll road as well.
Seems like I remember that it was against the law for an interstate to be a toll road. One wonders when that changed?
Posted by: South Carolina at November 02, 2009 09:25 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: exdem13 at November 02, 2009 09:33 AM (lYKj1)
Posted by: Michael Rittenhouse at November 02, 2009 09:48 AM (iqQjc)
They eat ticks. When I was a kid we'd get covered with ticks whenever we visited Granny's farm. Until the fire ants moved in. Now--no more ticks. So we don't have the Lyme disease problem that places up north do.
You don't want them covering the place, but a few mounds here and there are beneficial.
Posted by: stace at November 02, 2009 10:37 AM (g/wgk)
Posted by: Hellrider at November 02, 2009 10:45 AM (ToMgg)
This is why America was formed as a Federal Republic. It allows 50 different forms of "State", all midly constrained by the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. Citizens can then chose with their feet which version they like (i.e., massive growth in Nevada and Texas).
OR...
so it was supposed to be. Concentration of power such as the current Federal Government and all its regulations and laws ever more constricting on the States is a sure-fire path to destruction. One-world government as currently being attempted by the fascists in the UN is an even worse scenario.
Governments should be constructed (power wise) much like Hobbes Social Contract. There should be many individual little fiedoms all mutually constrained by voluntary contract (i.e., mutally agreed upon laws). That can be hierachical all the way to planet level. The problem today is that the laws (the contract) are being created from the top down by fiat, not by requirement and agreement from the bottom up. Welcome to "1984".
Posted by: chuck in st paul at November 02, 2009 10:50 AM (adr25)
You don't want them covering the place, but a few mounds here and there are beneficial.
You wouldnt say that if you ever accidentally stepped on one of those mounds and them little SOBs all over your ass biting the hell out of you. Ill take the ticks any day.
Posted by: Vic at November 02, 2009 10:56 AM (CDUiN)
I lived in California for 10 years, the weather is wonderful, the roads were great but I would not move back there for anything. The state is run by the special interest groups through the DNC. The environmentalist and the unionist and the homosexual lobbies get the moron in Sacramento to pass anything that they want, if they pay enough. The various groups get together and ensure that the state creates a hostile business atmosphere which is why I and many others have left. Then they complain that the tax revenues are not enough to support the life style that they wish. The idiots of Hollywood, most of them do not actually live in the state, campaign for liberal agendas that they know they will not have to pay for, but they think that they are above the law anyway. The politician do not care if the policies that they are being paid to pass will cost Joe Average his right arm or his job, as long as they get the necessary kickback.
I miss the weather but, I keep a lot more of my paycheck here.
Posted by: John at November 02, 2009 11:29 AM (bvaOU)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at November 02, 2009 12:57 PM (m7fvM)
Posted by: Cack Finger at November 02, 2009 01:01 PM (LDQCY)
Posted by: Cack Finger at November 02, 2009 01:06 PM (LDQCY)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 02, 2009 02:01 PM (wwQxi)
Posted by: Teresa Koch at November 02, 2009 04:43 PM (9n9Wm)
Louis Vuitton SPEEDY 30
Louis Vuitton SPEEDY 30
Louis Vuitton SPEEDY 30
Louis Vuitton Pochette Accessoires collections from Louis Vuitton.
Check out the new Louis Vuitton
Posted by: kjfghkj at November 04, 2009 02:39 AM (cZylS)
ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. cheap hosting company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. windows vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customer price.
Posted by: Mark at May 10, 2010 04:33 AM (6DZhO)
Posted by: herman198 at March 10, 2011 01:15 AM (tnRWG)
Posted by: herman198 at March 14, 2011 09:24 PM (jkYgz)
Posted by: how to transfer songs from ipod to itunes at April 14, 2011 12:35 AM (2JYnr)
Posted by: mercedes benz at May 02, 2011 08:18 AM (8JAkx)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









