July 31, 2008
— DrewM Very good news from the President today on the state of affairs in Iraq and what it will mean for US troops.
U.S. President George W. Bush on Thursday held out the prospect of further troop withdrawals from Iraq as he hailed security gains there and cut the length of combat tours for U.S. forces in the country.Bush, in an appearance at the White House, said violence in Iraq had fallen to its lowest point since the spring of 2004 and that progress on the ground was showing a "degree of durability."
"We are now in our third consecutive month with reduced violence levels holding steady," Bush said.
From the what if the US wins and war and no one notices department, of the three broadcast networks only CBS covered the Presidents announcement. Apparently gardening and beauty tips or whatever the hell the talk about on GMA and the Today Show were more important.

An image the MSM is not interested in...A US Soldier and Iraqi child
Posted by: DrewM at
05:40 AM
| Comments (42)
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: GarandFan at July 31, 2008 05:44 AM (eJ32B)
Posted by: roy at July 31, 2008 05:50 AM (cB77O)
Posted by: Big Mo at July 31, 2008 05:51 AM (HI9pP)
Posted by: chad at July 31, 2008 06:00 AM (WNcvq)
Posted by: chad at July 31, 2008 06:01 AM (WNcvq)
So do you consider that a trend, MSM douchenozzles?
Posted by: runninrebel at July 31, 2008 06:08 AM (qAMnO)
Illegal immigration down 11%
Recession? Not so much.
Lowest troop casualties since 2004.
It's almost as if WNAF after all.
Posted by: runninrebel at July 31, 2008 06:15 AM (qAMnO)
We could win this shit in spectacular fashion and the MSM will be quiet as a churchmouse just you watch. You all know its coming. The only reason we hear about Vietnam so much is because we lost. Democrats don't like talking about successful wars, it gives people ideas. Ideas like the fact that some tyrants need to get skullfucked from time to time.
Posted by: Dr. Chopper at July 31, 2008 06:18 AM (vjl9g)
Just a bit OT, but not much... I hope everyone is watching how the MSM is handling the capture and trial of Radavan Karratztop or whatever the fuck his name is - I'm pretty sure there is a "Z" in there someplace, which is usually bad news IYKWIMAITYD, right ZBig?
Anyway, note the lack of any moral equivalence shit or questioing about due process, or his rights and crap in the MSM. He is simply a "bad guy", no questions asked. Know why? Because a Democrat started the war against him, even though he did not directly threaten the US. But it was a Dem, so starting a war is not used to beat him up.
Wait until we kill or capture Bin Laden or his 2IC, and you will see a big difference. OBL killed 3,000 American civilians directly, but he will be treated with more deference in the MSM than RK above, and there will be endless wailings about where and how he should be tried, unless he is killed, and then the wailing will be about whether we had the right to, and whether it was necessary, and couldn't we have captured him, ad nauseum.
The difference is not the criminal, it is the American who seeks to bring him to justice, one George W. Bush. The MSM will do anything to tarnish any accomplishment of this President, while they meekly play it straight for his Dem predecessor's adventures (which I do not dispute were, in that case, worthwhile). The MSM will be joined in this by all the usual suspects, the Dems, Hollywood, academia, the "world community", etc., but the MSM will be the ringleader as usual.
The MSM has forfeited it's right to any special status or honorable regard by becoming a totally partisan political movement tha puts party ahead of country (sound familiar?). It is going to have to be reined in before it kills many more of us. Any conservative worthy of the name should by wondering how to accomplish that within the law, lest it ultimately be accomplished in ways that do violence to not only to the MSM but our Constitution. The MSM must be stopped from becoming a Kevorkian suicide machine for America, something it is well on the way to achieving.
Posted by: sherlock at July 31, 2008 06:21 AM (cq3pU)
Posted by: EC at July 31, 2008 06:22 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: greg s at July 31, 2008 06:23 AM (V40IZ)
This is one of my favorite photos. I like that the soldier has got down to talk to the boy and that he allows the boy to stand on his boots because he has no shoes and the sand burns his feet. Our soldiers, by the way, are always collecting money to buy sandals for kids.
Posted by: Mothra at July 31, 2008 06:28 AM (vk1s8)
...two of those deaths actually occurred months and months ago (they were MIA, presumed dead, but their bodies were found in July)
Posted by: JFH at July 31, 2008 06:34 AM (fXS6O)
A U.S. soldier throws an Iraqi child in the air in an act of rage, following an IED attack in the city.
Posted by: Benson at July 31, 2008 06:36 AM (qzcNU)
Posted by: oops at July 31, 2008 06:41 AM (TBoxe)
Posted by: Crassius Maximus at July 31, 2008 06:43 AM (0g/Rt)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at July 31, 2008 06:46 AM (B+qrE)
Crassius
I totally agree. I've written here several times that the only way to stop the nationwide liberal temper tantrum is to elect a Dem. They are completely insufferable otherwise. Similarly Dems have never seen a socialist or communist war they didn't like either.
Posted by: Dr. Chopper at July 31, 2008 06:49 AM (vjl9g)
Posted by: Crassius Maximus at July 31, 2008 06:51 AM (0g/Rt)
Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at July 31, 2008 06:54 AM (9G7tc)
No matter how you spin, the soldiers - and their families - win this one.
Thank you all for your great service.
(Oh yeah, dems suck!)
Posted by: TomJW at July 31, 2008 07:33 AM (xRCpL)
Is good.
Shorter, fewer deployments means happier troops. Happier troops don't quit. Military better able to face what's next.
Is good.
Posted by: MamaAJ at July 31, 2008 07:33 AM (X6Zdh)
Heh. I have a friend who complains that Bush destroyed his marriage because he was deployed so often. I point out to him that one, a good chunk of his deployment was during the Clinton years, and two, his wife left him because he wouldn't keep his pants zipped up, whether home, or abroad. Nevertheless, he's got 24 years in.
Posted by: Mothra at July 31, 2008 07:50 AM (vk1s8)
Posted by: jdun at July 31, 2008 08:02 AM (cVyBC)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 31, 2008 08:39 AM (SLqkZ)
Shorter, fewer deployments means happier troops. Happier troops don't quit. Military better able to face what's next.
The liberal media phrase "Stop Losses" quietly will slip down the memory hole....
Posted by: Curmudgeon at July 31, 2008 08:41 AM (ujg0T)
Circa (Insert Year Here)- A Republican Senator whould be in front of cameras EVERY DAMNED DAY asking Harry Reid if the war is lost.
McCain should do it in a campaign commercial except he's too busy expressing his admiration for Nancy McBotox. Hell, which of them has the stones to press the issue? Jim Demint maybe.
Posted by: CavMedic at July 31, 2008 08:44 AM (rYFmu)
Posted by: MAJHAM at July 31, 2008 08:50 AM (5ap+X)
It's hard to capture or kill a rotting corpse, but you were spot on about the sob sisters in the media and how they'd react. Here's hoping we get to find out because Zawahiri gets his ass ganked by a hellfire.
Which speaking of, is it just me or has W told the CIA to take the gloves off and kill these fucks on sight? It seems like at least once a month now I'm hearing about one of these pieces of crap being in pieces all over the crazy belt of Pakistan .
Funny how since that tubby bitch Adam Gadahn lost his ability to pound down Little Debbies we haven't seen any more Bin Laden videos.
Posted by: nightwitch at July 31, 2008 09:58 AM (dfTf5)
And now with their top ten hit, Barry Can You Hear Me is The Who?
Barry, can you see me?
Can I help to cheer you?
Barry, can you hear me?
Can you feel me near you?
Oooh, Barry, Barry, Barry, Barry.
Barry, can you hear me?
Can you feel me near you?
Barry, can you see me?
Can I help to cheer you?
Oooh, Barry, Barry, Barry,
Barry, Barry, Barry.
Posted by: Rev Dr The Man E Buzz BigNuts at July 31, 2008 10:11 AM (QTcsf)
I still believe if Bush had been using his bully pulpit more aggressively to get these type of positive details of progress onto the airwaves instead of repeating the same talking points of "staying the course" and letting spokespeople do the talking, he and this war would have been much more popularly supported. He should have also went to Iraq to see some of the progress first hand, outside of a holiday morale booster and photo op. While this administration has gotten many of the big questions on the war right, it has been politically stupid.
OT, but, what I think this site needs is more boobies. Just a suggestion.
Posted by: Rich at July 31, 2008 10:44 AM (Qrjpn)
The MSM must have strong backs to keep moving the goalposts.
I sense the meme they will now push will be that "Yeah, Iraq is better off, but it took 4000 lives that could've been used for catching Bin Laden. And Hope and Change will magically fix all of this with his magic unicorn."
OT, but did you hear about Olbermann trashing the 2nd Amendment?
Posted by: eddiebear at July 31, 2008 10:53 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: Rich at July 31, 2008 10:57 AM (Qrjpn)
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at July 31, 2008 10:59 AM (kKgTD)
Keif, the moving finger writes: Obviously, those would have to be the kind of arms in use in 1791, when the Bill of Rights was passed -- the musket, the wheel-lock, the flint lock, the 13th century Chinese hand canon. Stuff like that.
Double load with canister! Open carry of hand cannon would be delightfully condusive to a polite society..
Posted by: toby hussein 928 at July 31, 2008 11:08 AM (PD1tk)
First comment pwnage from eddiebear's KO link:
By extension, freedom of the press only applies to media that existed in 1791. That eliminates TV, radio, and the internet.
If
Posted by: toby hussein 928 at July 31, 2008 11:11 AM (PD1tk)
if keith could read, that would leave a mark
Posted by: toby hussein 928 at July 31, 2008 11:12 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Andrew the Noisy at July 31, 2008 12:29 PM (cntKs)
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at July 31, 2008 02:31 PM (VC56G)
Posted by: PInch Sulzberger at July 31, 2008 05:38 PM (i+Nr/)
Posted by: rtyu at November 26, 2008 10:58 PM (53V9W)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









