April 30, 2006
— Ace One was funny, the other wasn't.
Steve Colbert offered up the standard arch-liberal complaint about the media: that they were "too easy" on Bush as far as WMD intelligence and, get this, tax cuts. (!!!???)
Allah has a link and a pan, and sagely notes:
In Colberts defense, he might not have been playing for laughs. The dissident posture is very important to our friends on the left; if SC had kept things light and wasted his opportunity to speak truth to power, theyd have crucified him for it. As it is, the moonbats will be building statues of him tomorrow. To paraphrase another delusional comedian who wasnt as funny as he thought he was, better to be Kos for a night than a schmuck for a lifetime.
The media is swooning over Colbert's performance -- despite the fact that he all but accused them in complicity in pushing the Iraq War. (And-- TAX CUTS!!)
Why? Why are they so happy to be insulted?
Because the media loves being criticized from the left.
They want the license to move further to the left than they already are, and, to have a pretext to do so, they require critics who accuse them of being too conservative.
When they get accused of being too conservative or too easy on Bush, they get to claim, absurdly, "Well, we get it from both the left and the right, so that proves that we're straight-down-the-middle fair and balanced."
Translating this from liberal-media-speak: "Keep the criticism coming, fellow liberals, because we need to be able to 'prove' we're not liberally biased. And, because we care more about what YOU say -- you agree with us and we agree with you, even if we have to play this Kabuki theater where we pretend we're in disagreement -- we'll be more responsive to your liberal/left complaints than we've ever been regarding complaints from the right."
It's the left's claims of the press being "too easy" on Bush that have inspired them to reveal extremely-damaging national security secrets in order to regain the praise from the only people whose opinions they care about-- other liberals and leftists.
And if Poland is exposed to an Al Qaeda attack, well, that's a small price to pay to regain the admiration of their fellow travellers.
Bush, meanwhile, was actually funny, as he goofed on himself alongside dead-on Bush impersonator Steven Bridges.
But then, his mission, unlike Colbert's, was to entertain, not to "educate."
As Thomas Jefferson said:
Jackass TV clowns who fancy themselves philosophers really steam my beans. More with the seltzer down the pants, Joke-Monkey, less with the retarded commentary.
Either I'm Psychic Or Liberals Are As Predicatable As Monkeys With A Big Stockpile of Feces Update: In his own update, Allah notes that a part of the broadcast he didn't include contains an endorsement of my liberals-need-to-be-told-they're-too-easy-on-Bush-as-an-excuse-to-go-harder-on-him theory.
[]Mark Smith, the president of the Correspondents Association, made exactly that point when introducing Bush.
I'm sure he means Smith made the "we're too easy on Bush" point, rather than explicitly asking for liberal critics to attack the press. But the invitation is there: Please call us cowards so we have the leeway to be "more brave," and by "more brave," I mean, of course, "more liberal." (They're synonymous, aren't they? After all, liberalism is the highest form of courage. James C. Calhoun said that.)
I didn't see the event, but Johnny Coldcuts, the time-travelling foul-mouthed baloney sandwich, saw it three months ago, so he tipped me to this angle.
Posted by: Ace at
09:06 AM
| Comments (101)
Post contains 604 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 09:12 AM (FnVST)
Jackass TV clowns who fancy themselves philosophers really steam my beans. More with the seltzer down the pants, Joke-Monkey, less with the retarded commentary.
Was that from "Stuff Jefferson Said, Volume 3" or "Volume 5"?
Posted by: Drumwaster at April 30, 2006 09:50 AM (h4Hhq)
Posted by: Laddy at April 30, 2006 09:59 AM (Jcl/L)
Johnny Triangles
Posted by: T. at April 30, 2006 10:01 AM (uLFef)
Posted by: SmugMonkey at April 30, 2006 10:54 AM (PuyP1)
Scalia was in stitches when Colbert spoke some Sicilian with him. It was so funny. I think is a reflection of his strong character and his ability to really laugh at himself.
The press, on the other hand, were pissed. So was Bush, his face turned bright red. Oh man, I never laughed so hard. The impersonator was kind of good, but it was just a bunch silly antics... Like watching Carrot Top or something.
Colbert, on the other hand, just layed into everyone. You could have heard a pin drop. With the exception of Scalia, he basically proved that the Washington Elite is a bunch of babies who can't take criticism. Of course the Associated Press doesn't get it, but who cares about them.
Posted by: at April 30, 2006 10:58 AM (RA3GB)
I don't get it; I thought he was damn funny. What were the jokes supposed to be about, how awesome Bush is?
These things are like roasts, essentially--why is everybody all up in arms about it?
Posted by: Hubris at April 30, 2006 11:04 AM (ghFND)
By the way, Colbert is not funny. He panders to the humorless Left who will
laugh at anything anti-right.
Posted by: Bart at April 30, 2006 11:14 AM (qthYi)
Real conservatives are actually smart, decent people. What Colbert is making fun of is the stupid pundits that make us all look like we're illogical morons. It's time to cull the herd of stupid "right wing" pundits and bloggers who are just trying to cash in on the grassroots popularity of the movement.
Posted by: at April 30, 2006 11:26 AM (RA3GB)
Smith said that left-wingers call the media poodles for the administration and that right-wingers call them attack dogs, which proves that the press is getting it exactly right. Exactly as you said.
Posted by: Allah at April 30, 2006 02:46 PM (CbBW/)
My reaction was mostly, "Eh."
Bush's routine was very funny, though.
Posted by: CraigC at April 30, 2006 02:58 PM (+7sBO)
Or is the new plan to attribute fake quotes to fake people?
Posted by: max at April 30, 2006 03:04 PM (210f1)
At one point he pulled a manila folder out of his suit and (I believe - I haven't been able to find the video online) handed it to Hilary.
Classic.
Posted by: jmn at April 30, 2006 03:04 PM (FvqJT)
He got two solid laughs: when he called Joe Wilson the most famous husband since Desi Arnaz and when he did the Scalia bit.
Posted by: Allah at April 30, 2006 03:10 PM (CbBW/)
Posted by max at April 30, 2006 08:04 PM
Fakery is the highest form of flattery.
Posted by: George Washington at April 30, 2006 03:12 PM (aBntd)
Bad form is bad form and easily recognized. Whatever the left's delusions, this stuff helps us and hurts them/
Posted by: Reddish Jode at April 30, 2006 03:16 PM (PRxH4)
Colbert is usually very funny, but only when he has everything set up and writers working with him. I don't think he's all that great at improv.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 30, 2006 03:27 PM (1Vbso)
Posted by: John at April 30, 2006 03:37 PM (HP2Wr)
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson at April 30, 2006 03:41 PM (UFwUd)
You guys were supposed to be my fans. You showed me no support when I got hammered by the media for no good reason.
Posted by: Kenny Rogers at April 30, 2006 03:47 PM (2FkSx)
Posted by: Kenny Rogers at April 30, 2006 03:51 PM (ZBys+)
Posted by: Kenny Rogers at April 30, 2006 04:00 PM (2FkSx)
Posted by: Kenny Rogers at April 30, 2006 04:05 PM (ZBys+)
Posted by: Not Zero at April 30, 2006 04:18 PM (z0Wgm)
the last good, heaving gut chuckle will be the day he awaits sentencing in slobo's old hague jailcell. the sooner, the better.
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:22 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 04:23 PM (FnVST)
More troll vomit - the Republicans' best friend in the upcoming elections.
Posted by: max at April 30, 2006 04:29 PM (210f1)
I'm on your side.
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:37 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:39 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:41 PM (7nrVi)
It tickles me when trolls start calling people stupid while at the same time completely ignoring basic things like spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.
Yes, orgasmatronicus, we all wish we were as smart as you are. *snicker*
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at April 30, 2006 04:45 PM (CwYZr)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:47 PM (7nrVi)
colbert's funny. the president is a clown; a dangerous fool, stumbling through history, drunk on power. I look at him and I think: we suck, totally suck.
it's hilarious.
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:50 PM (7nrVi)
No, this is "is" good as I've got. You fucking worthless namby-pamby shitstain troll douchebag, go fuck yourself and then lube up your poor excuse for a cock with diarrhea and shove it in your mother's mouth. Better?
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at April 30, 2006 04:52 PM (CwYZr)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:54 PM (7nrVi)
The president is a clown
a dangerous fool
stumbling through history
drunk on power
I look at him and I think
I totally want to do him
Posted by: scott at April 30, 2006 04:55 PM (Ffvoi)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 04:56 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 04:58 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 04:59 PM (7nrVi)
I know, man. Like, totally. Gotta vote Nader in 2008. It's the only way out of this right-wing deadlock between two puppet parties, bought and paid for by the corporations. Truth to power! Nader 2008!
Posted by: sandy burger at April 30, 2006 05:00 PM (FmfCF)
funny, still. no revolution for you, unless you fuck your sister in front of your parole board.
your world is over, twat. can't you see?
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:02 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: hutch1200 at April 30, 2006 05:04 PM (rp46+)
PS Does anyone else suspect that erg's breath would make even a camel puke?
Posted by: max at April 30, 2006 05:04 PM (210f1)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:05 PM (7nrVi)
Don't steal my shit, Mike S.
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson at April 30, 2006 05:06 PM (l6LOK)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 05:07 PM (FnVST)
ace's dwindling traffic. gee, I wonder why.
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:10 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:12 PM (7nrVi)
This won't happen because my world is apparently over.
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 05:13 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 05:14 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:18 PM (7nrVi)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:24 PM (FnVST)
A small Freudian typo; I'm sure erg meant to put the 'i' in hoiw after 'how' - i.e 'how i fucked up things'
Posted by: troll control at April 30, 2006 05:26 PM (210f1)
Posted by: ergastularius at April 30, 2006 05:37 PM (7nrVi)
Lkjhdgkjh,kdjgh mh djghdgghgg.
George Bush is so freakin' hot.
Posted by: ergastularious at April 30, 2006 05:42 PM (Ffvoi)
Troll Control was not critcizing your typing, as should have been obvious, just trying to help clarify your intent.
Troll Control is always willing to help the helpless, and sometimes even the hopeless.
Posted by: Troll Control at April 30, 2006 05:44 PM (210f1)
P.S. I shit on your bible! The Koran, I'm ambivalent toward. Marxists know the real threat is Bob Jones University!
P.P.S. Everyone looks forward to my presence at family reunions!
Posted by: Ergomomically Incorrect at April 30, 2006 05:53 PM (rZ5uY)
Posted by: geoff at April 30, 2006 05:57 PM (nH1Ad)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 06:00 PM (FnVST)
You're the worst damn typist I've ever seen here. God damn you suck.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 30, 2006 06:25 PM (UFwUd)
O, Ergastularius,
With odd stain on monitor
You type with one hand?
Granted, it lack seasonal reference.
Posted by: Random Japanese Tourist at April 30, 2006 07:17 PM (+DMjG)
Posted by: Mike S. at April 30, 2006 07:33 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: CraigC at April 30, 2006 08:56 PM (+7sBO)
How about this? Because his routine was all "challenging" and "edgy" and "left-wing" and "douche-like" and "devastatingly not humorous", it was referred to as being "Margaret Cho like" or something like that. As a complement. Talk about damning with faint praise.
Posted by: Shawn, but not lowercased shawn at April 30, 2006 09:01 PM (wZLWV)
Or at least coherent.
the revolution is nie.
We are the Knights Who Say "Nie!"
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at May 01, 2006 03:25 AM (CwYZr)
So how's that communist revolution working out for you anyway? Still speaking truth to power and all that? Are those ANSWER chicks as fugly as they look?
Posted by: JackStraw at May 01, 2006 03:25 AM (J8+2b)
Posted by: spurwing plover at May 01, 2006 03:51 AM (aTvBX)
Posted by: at May 01, 2006 04:16 AM (KeOQp)
Posted by: Reddish Jode at May 01, 2006 04:17 AM (KeOQp)
I suppose I will start with the subject of this post: Colbert. He played his tv persona to a T. He did the exact same schtick he does on his show every single night. If you find his show funny, you found his presentation funny. Whoever invited him should be blamed/thanked depending on which side you are on. He did exactly what he does.
As far as his bad "improv" as one person claimed. Colbert is from Second City in Chicago the most legendary improv theater on the planet. His improv skills are spot on. You don't know what you are talking about.
And now all the crap going back and forth from the Egkdjfksj guy and all the people bashing him: I love it. It is typical right-wing BS. When you don't like a message, destroy the messenger and ignore what he/she actually said. You guys do the best impressions of yourselves. "Ohh, he used bad grammar." "Ewww, he misquoted somebody" "Wahh, he is a moonbat." Go cry into cherrios you little babies.
Posted by: Ryan at May 01, 2006 04:24 AM (rTIJo)
Say what you will about Latin, but it's concise.
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at May 01, 2006 04:25 AM (CwYZr)
Posted by: at May 01, 2006 04:27 AM (CwYZr)
What was erq's message? All I saw was name-calling (by him), opinions stated as facts and enough bds to make a camel fart.
2. Ergastularius is the Latin word for the slave who tattled on other slaves to the overseer or owner - a modern-day equivalent would be an informer to the secret police in a slave state like National Socialist Germany or the USSR. That's why I call him the quisling slave, although perhaps informer slave or capo slave would be better.
Posted by: max at May 01, 2006 04:42 AM (XrQv1)
Posted by: Sue Dohnim at May 01, 2006 04:50 AM (rE+jU)
His wood-fired chicken was real good, it was too bad the chain didn't make it.
Decent sides, too.
My mom loved that soup in a breadbowl thing.
Posted by: lauraw at May 01, 2006 05:21 AM (CERBJ)
Posted by: Kenny Rogers at May 01, 2006 05:33 AM (pzen5)
Now go ahead and flame me.....EYE LUV IT!
Posted by: Ryan at May 01, 2006 05:57 AM (rTIJo)
Ryan make Bush straw man
Then tear it to shreds with teeth.
He live with mother.
Posted by: Random Japanese Tourist at May 01, 2006 06:24 AM (F3Ima)
He didn't demonstrate it when given a live chance to show these alleged skills - and given most people never heard of him before the Jon Stewart show, I find your claim doubtful.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 01, 2006 06:46 AM (1Vbso)
Perhaps, but it's not his resume that's at question here, it's the quality of his performance at the dinner. The political content of his performance seems to be getting rave reviews from the usual suspects, but the entertainment value seems to be attracting somewhat more negative criticism.
Posted by: Slublog at May 01, 2006 06:51 AM (R8+nJ)
You are judging these "improv" skills that you don't even know he was using. How do you know if he was scripted or was improvising? Maybe he was scripted and sucked reading the teleprompter.
Love,
Ryan-San who apparently lives with his mother
Posted by: Ryan at May 01, 2006 09:45 AM (rTIJo)
If this is an accurate definition, that would make him a patriot.
"Slave who tattled on other slaves to overseer" translates roughly into GOP-speak as "patriot." There are some subtelties of translation. For example, the GOP-speak "patriot" is also used to describe "one who will sacrifice liberty to please a Republican President."
This should be distinguished from the traditional American use of the word "patriot," which simply refers to those who are willing to fight for the common good of the nation and its highest ideals.
Maybe Erg works for the NSA, keeping a close eye on the quakers.
Posted by: at May 01, 2006 10:28 AM (1WdUw)
Posted by: Condensed Ryan at May 01, 2006 10:28 AM (rE+jU)
This plan has a long pedigree. "Maximizing the contradictions." It's the reason German commies hated moderates more than Nazis.
Posted by: at May 01, 2006 12:28 PM (a3KVd)
"INTELLIGENCE SOURCES SAY VALERIE WILSON WAS PART OF AN OPERATION THREE YEARS AGO TRACKING THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS MATERIAL INTO IRAN. AND THE SOURCES ALLEGE THAT WHEN MRS. WILSON'S COVER WAS BLOWN, THE ADMINISTRATION'S ABILITY TO TRACK IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS WAS DAMAGED AS WELL."
Posted by: Mike at May 01, 2006 01:26 PM (leJWb)
Mike Scheuer, who headed the Central Intelligence Agency's bin Laden unit for 6 years, told Australian Broadcasting Company's "Four Corners" that U.S. President George W. Bush turned down a chance to kill Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, believed to be the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq.
"Mr Bush had Mr Zarqawi in his sights for almost every day for a year before the invasion of Iraq and he didn't shoot because they were wining and dining the French in an effort to get them to assist us in the invasion of Iraq."
Posted by: Mike at May 01, 2006 01:29 PM (leJWb)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 01, 2006 01:41 PM (1Vbso)
Posted by: Slublog at May 01, 2006 02:06 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: Brad at May 01, 2006 02:28 PM (1F8YK)
Posted by: Mike S. at May 01, 2006 02:33 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: Ryan at May 01, 2006 02:34 PM (FnVST)
Posted by: Hmmm at May 01, 2006 10:06 PM (1L4b+)
Posted by: nikkolai at May 02, 2006 02:04 AM (70wcC)
Posted by: at May 02, 2006 09:25 PM (VhIWs)
Posted by: at May 02, 2006 09:27 PM (VhIWs)
Posted by: dizzle at May 02, 2006 09:30 PM (iKzAW)
Jackass TV clowns who fancy themselves philosophers really steam my beans. More with the seltzer down the pants, Joke-Monkey, less with the retarded commentary.
The reason that this quote falls easily into the category of retarded commentary, in case you haven't figured it out:
Thomas Jefferson died almost 100 years before TV was invented.
As for Colbert... He only pointed out the obvious. The man should be Bush's advisor. For gods sake, why didn't his cabinet feel the need to point out the obvious before it was too late.
Posted by: sherlock at May 04, 2006 05:26 AM (ix19K)
Thomas Jefferson died almost 100 years before TV was invented. I guess that's why they call you sherlock.
With a small "s".
The real Sherlock Holmes actually got clues.
Posted by: Roy at May 04, 2006 05:37 AM (2XXia)
Posted by: Burberry Wallet at April 16, 2012 10:01 AM (r18NY)
Posted by: Gucci Wallet at May 15, 2012 06:38 AM (pNnNQ)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









