April 24, 2009
— Ace Wow. A lot of claims made about Zubaydah.
First, we were told he was, literally, "insane" and could not provide any intelligence, as he was just imaginin' shit.
At the same time, I think we oversold [Zubaydah's] value -- the administration did -- to the American public. That's indisputable. As well, what folks inside the CIA and FBI were realizing, even as the president and others inside the administration were emphasizing the profound malevolence and value strategically to the capture of Zubaydah, is that Zubaydah is psychologically imbalanced, he has multiple personalities. And he was not involved in various events that we thought he was involved in. During various bombings in the late '90s, he was not where we thought he would be. That's shown in the diaries, where he goes through long lists of quotidian, nonsensical details about various people and what they're doing, folks that he's moving around, getting plane tickets for and serving tea to, all in the voices of three different characters; page after page of his diary, filled, including on dates where, I'm trying to think, it was either the Khobar Towers or the Cole, where we thought he was involved in the bombing and he clearly wasn't.
Next up: Zubaydah's interrogation, the WaPo claims, was worthless because it didn't foil any Al Qaeda plots.
Well, except that whole "Second Wave" of jetliners to be crashed into LA skyscrapers.
Would you like to try again?
Okay, how about this version: Sure, he was telling us important stuff, but he was telling us it without waterboarding, so waterboarding was unnecessary.
But there are levels of cooperation. FBI agent Soufan was pleased with Zubaydah's cooperation. The CIA was not.
In Thailand, the new C.I.A. team concluded that under standard questioning Mr. Zubaydah was revealing only a small fraction of what he knew, and decided that more aggressive techniques were warranted.At times, Mr. Zubaydah, still weak from his wounds, was stripped and placed in a cell without a bunk or blankets. He stood or lay on the bare floor, sometimes with air-conditioning adjusted so that, one official said, Mr. Zubaydah seemed to turn blue. At other times, the interrogators piped in deafening blasts of music by groups like the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Sometimes, the interrogator would use simpler techniques, entering his cell to ask him to confess.
“You know what I want,” the interrogator would say to him, according to one official’s account, departing leaving Mr. Zubaydah to brood over his answer.
F.B.I. agents on the scene angrily protested the more aggressive approach, arguing that persuasion rather than coercion had succeeded. But leaders of the C.I.A. interrogation team were convinced that tougher tactics were warranted and said that the methods had been authorized by senior lawyers at the White House.
Read Maguire's link. While Soufan says that waterboarding wasn't necessary, because "traditional" methods were working, in fact "traditional" methods had not been working at all -- Zubaydah was prompted to talk, even while Soufan was involved, by icy-cell treatment, ear-splitting music, etc. In other words, all the "torture" short of waterboarding had been needed to spur him to talk.
The left can take this as a claim that waterboarding itself wasn't needed, but they can't take it as a claim that enhanced interrogation techniques weren't needed -- those techniques were exactly the ones that got him chatting.
Furthermore, Soufan seems to think that Zubaydah would have given it all up without waterboarding, if we'd just been patient. Well, maybe. Difference of opinion, it seems. We do know that he spilled more with waterboarding. Whether he would have spilled without it -- who knows. Soufan can offer his speculation but that's all it is.
Arguing in the Alternative... I am really tired of the left's propensity to seize upon one inconsistent argument after another. They all have the same conclusion -- torture bad! -- but they change premises at the drop of a hat.
Posted by: Ace at
09:41 AM
| Comments (67)
Post contains 676 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 24, 2009 09:42 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: usmc8511 at April 24, 2009 09:45 AM (lzwRt)
That said, the CIA exists for a very different reason and with very different people. Doing the dirty shit no one else can or should be allowed to is why they exist.
Posted by: DrewM. at April 24, 2009 09:45 AM (hlYel)
Posted by: Uniball's Dick at April 24, 2009 09:48 AM (CoINT)
Posted by: Osama Bin Laden at April 24, 2009 09:48 AM (ngD76)
Posted by: slizzle at April 24, 2009 09:52 AM (zG+3k)
Speaking as a certified MDTM, this is the fastest recovery from a VD I've ever seen.
Well done ace.
Posted by: Ed at April 24, 2009 09:54 AM (VplQ7)
Just a way to keep you wingnuts occupied while I rob you blind and further bananaize the republic.
Reparations bitchz!1!!
Posted by: B. Obama at April 24, 2009 09:54 AM (o5vMm)
-
(1) The safe word being "Israel has the Right to Exist"
Posted by: BumperStickerist at April 24, 2009 09:55 AM (ruzrP)
http://is.gd/um53
Posner writes that Zubaydah didn't start talking until two Saudi uniformed US Special Forces operatives were put in the room to question Zubaydah.
Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at April 24, 2009 09:56 AM (AHrTm)
I wonder how well that will work out for him.
Hasn't worked out too well in the Treasury dept or Wall Street.
Posted by: Boeing at April 24, 2009 09:56 AM (YaBmG)
Posted by: The Left at April 24, 2009 09:56 AM (VplQ7)
Posted by: buzzion at April 24, 2009 09:56 AM (Lrsi6)
At other times, the interrogators piped in deafening blasts of music by groups like the Red Hot Chili Peppers
I like pleasure spiked with pain and music is my aeroplane, it's my aeroplane.
Posted by: Tim at April 24, 2009 09:56 AM (73IaE)
Posted by: The CIA at April 24, 2009 09:58 AM (Gkhxf)
My country has fallen into the control of politicians and bureaucrats, and their media toadies, who place their personal vanities over her safety. As much as I hate them, "hate" pales in comparison to the contempt I feel for the fainthearted appeasers on "our side" who lack the personal courage to stand up to them.
If you aren't boycotting the MSM and the products and companies that pay for their lies, you aren't paying attention, or don't care.
Posted by: sherlock at April 24, 2009 09:59 AM (jdXw+)
Doing what ever is necessary to prevent an event is not necessarily in the best interests of a good investigation that leads to a successful prosecution. If the two can be accomplished together, then great. When they are at odds, which is more important?
While patience might have worked, it also may have cost us a chunk of LA. Remember the laptop kabuki dance. The CIA had a nibble and they went after it, good job. They learned the lesson of 9/11; it looks like the FBI and the Dems did not.
Posted by: Jean at April 24, 2009 09:59 AM (L64A6)
Posted by: WTF Capital Investments at April 24, 2009 02:56 PM (AHrTm)
Yeah, I noticed that too. Sucks for them. By the way, did you see the new Palace I just bought? Financing it wasn't as tough as I thought it would be.
Posted by: The Third Saudi Prince at April 24, 2009 09:59 AM (VplQ7)
There is an old lawyer joke that goes something like this:
"My client is innocent, your honor, and has an airtight alibi, and even if the alibi isn't airtight, he wasn't even in town the night his wife was murdered, and even if he was in town the night his wife was murdered, he was insane."
(In other words, we plan to pursue multiple defense strategies and we're not even sure which way we're going on this one because he's guilty as sin.)
Sounds like FBI agent Soufan has heard that joke.
Posted by: PalinFan at April 24, 2009 10:00 AM (J5aoU)
Posted by: Dave C at April 24, 2009 10:02 AM (CoINT)
One time in college me and my girlfriend, who still lived at home with her parents, went out partying and then went parking down by the railroad tracks and accidently fell asleep passed out naked in the front seat of my pickup from to much whiskey and didn't wake up until the next morning about sunrise. I told her mom and dad the whole story. About 10 years after we got married.
But that particular morning we made up some bullshit about slow service at Denny's. Sounds like to me that that's the type of info the FBI was getting and was satisfied with. If my father in law had have waterboarded me that morning, he wouldn't have had to wait 10+ years to get the truth out of me.
20/20 hindsight is a motherhumper, no?
Posted by: pendejo grande at April 24, 2009 10:02 AM (PXZI9)
Zubaydah and his interrogator were both sentient organs in our living Universe, so what's known by one is known by the other and is indeed known by all.
Good and evil, culpable and innocent -- these are meaningless concepts. The important thing is to know the Universe while also knowing that none of us can truly understand it.
Get it?
Posted by: Guru FireHorse at April 24, 2009 10:03 AM (w9FHT)
"In Thailand, the new C.I.A. team concluded that under standard questioning Mr. Zubaydah was revealing only a small fraction of what he knew."
So apparently, Soufan's interrogation techniques sucked nads. Couldn't get shit out of him if he was a sewer. Any idea what we got out of him after CIA gave him the once over? More.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 24, 2009 10:03 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Garandfan at April 24, 2009 10:04 AM (C3okI)
"My client is innocent, your honor, and has an airtight alibi, and even if the alibi isn't airtight, he wasn't even in town the night his wife was murdered"
Uh, isn't being out of town the night of the murder an airtight alibi?
Posted by: Nitpicking jackass who thinks he's so clever, but is really a douche. at April 24, 2009 10:04 AM (VplQ7)
Posted by: Judith at April 24, 2009 10:05 AM (Ubvop)
I don't. The FBI has crowded out every other law enforcement agency on counterterrorism, so it's their bag now. I don't want a bunch of weeping willows tasked with hunting killers, foreign or domestic. I'm not saying the FBI should be waterboarding terrorists, but I don't want agents that faint at the thought of other people doing it.
Posted by: UGAdawg at April 24, 2009 10:07 AM (IE6OO)
Posted by: PalinFan at April 24, 2009 10:07 AM (J5aoU)
Why can't they just be honest and say that they don't care how many people die, they aren't going to do anything harsher than they do on Law and Order?
After all, those guys are caught within 40 minutes.
Posted by: AmishDude at April 24, 2009 10:10 AM (T0NGe)
Not if they planted the bomb/snake/booby-trapped bidet before they left.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 24, 2009 10:13 AM (z1Jlf)
After what these animals have done to US citizens and soldiers over the last few years, I can't believe we're even having a discussion over this.
Remember how the networks used to sign off each night with the national anthem? We ought to require them to show - every day in prime time - the planes hitting the WTC, people jumping from the windows, and the video and audio of Nick Berg getting beheaded. Just a little context.
Posted by: ReallyOldGuy at April 24, 2009 10:14 AM (6wpD4)
These procedures are NOT for a "confession" but for intel which is then checked out. I so wish that the Left would get that.
Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom at April 24, 2009 10:15 AM (3KCVn)
Posted by: AmishDude at April 24, 2009 03:10 PM (T0NGe)
For what it's worth, once the hordes of homicidal bomb planting veterans, tax protesters and border control advocates that Janet Napolitano warned us about start getting picked up by DHS, I'm sure the Left will become much more open to the idea of aggressive interogation.
Posted by: Ed at April 24, 2009 10:16 AM (VplQ7)
Posted by: lmg at April 24, 2009 10:29 AM (4/eFA)
Why can't the Left acknowledge hard moral choices?
Platittudes. Once it is no longer a platitude and becomes an exercise in logic, it is no longer grounded in idealism but in muddy truth. Also, there is an admission that people whom they disagree with have a point.
"Waterboarding never works." If they were to ever admit that it can, then it becomes a question of when it should be used. To save one life? To save ten? Three thousand? To prevent a nuclear attack?
Such complexities do not lend themselves to congratulatory self-back patting.
Semi-related: Hybrids that aren't immdiately recognizable as hybrids don't sell as well as those ugly ass ones that say at a distance: "That person cares."
Posted by: Lee at April 24, 2009 10:29 AM (TxTIh)
So true. They keep saying that torture doesn't 'work' and usually by work they mean a full and completely accurate confession. But interrogators are just looking to get any kind of information, especially details that can be checked against other sources. And psychologically once someone tells even a minor useful detail, it's much harder to avoid further talking. It's like pulling a thread - once you get the first one going, it's just a matter of time before the whole cloth unravels.
Posted by: Mætenloch at April 24, 2009 10:31 AM (z1Jlf)
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 24, 2009 10:32 AM (iafWn)
Posted by: CoolCzech at April 24, 2009 10:35 AM (iafWn)
Soufan's editorial should be read closely. I suggest most people on both sides of this issue are conveniently (but not necessarily deliberately) overlooking the word "magnifying" in that first sentence.
Posted by: slickdpdx at April 24, 2009 10:36 AM (RIdwM)
meant to put it in this thread:
let's throw so much crap at the wall that no one can see that the wall is about to crumble, and let's throw new crap out everyday so no one can fixate on any one thing.
"an outrage a day, keeps the GOP away"
and everyday we fall for it.
focus!
Carbon Tax and Nationalized Health Care, those are the issues that are being pushed in Congress right now, if you were about to do something you know everyone will hate, what do you do? you get them talking about something else, anything else to pull their attention away from what you're really doing.
Obama isn't a Genius, anyone can win when they make up the rules as they go along, we are the idiots who play along.
Posted by: shoey at April 24, 2009 10:39 AM (IRh55)
If we just sent in an interrogator who was more open minded and could create a dialogue.
And apologize for American arrogance.
Our problem is that we're just not willing to see the other point of view.
They wouldn't hate us so much if we didn't burn so much fossil fuel and listen to Britney Spears.
Posted by: Warden at April 24, 2009 10:44 AM (QoR4a)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 24, 2009 10:46 AM (xGIqT)
Posted by: Ed at April 24, 2009 10:47 AM (VplQ7)
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at April 24, 2009 10:49 AM (VplQ7)
Posted by: Vladmir Putin at April 24, 2009 11:00 AM (0Qynq)
Posted by: polynikes at April 24, 2009 11:46 AM (m2CN7)
The equate that sort of thing to cold rooms and yes, even waterboarding, is disingenuous in the extreme. The fight needs to be over the definition first, or no intelligent decision will be made.
A number of police jurisdictions have begun to protect themselves (in a small way) from all the frivolous tazer lawsuits by requiring ever cop that carries a tazer to be zapped with it once a year as part of requalifications. It really sucks the oxygen out of a lot of lawerly histrionics when the eeeevil cop can say on the stand, "I get tazed every year and it ain't all that bad." I think requiring every interrogator who is qualified to use waterboarding to undergo it themselves at least once would have the same deflating effects on the current arguments. And anyone who refuses to do that probably shouldn't be administering it, anyway. We demand a lot of our soldiers (SERE training, as mentioned above) and I don't see why CIA interrogators should be held to a lower standard.
Posted by: Flubber at April 24, 2009 11:50 AM (0jQJW)
Posted by: Venus at April 24, 2009 04:47 PM (YmPwQ)
It wasn't just for kicks. We were practicing for the Revolution. See ya soon, sweettits.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at April 24, 2009 12:03 PM (+Lj47)
Posted by: John Bespin at April 24, 2009 12:25 PM (RxpgP)
Posted by: WAstaterepub at April 24, 2009 12:46 PM (aC/SY)
Posted by: Suburban Scarecrow at April 24, 2009 01:28 PM (iCG3G)
Posted by: Suburban Scarecrow at April 24, 2009 01:29 PM (iCG3G)
Do you guys know whats going on?Your Idiot In Chief is fast tracking nationalized Medicare-passing laws so that the Senate has no chance to fillabuster this upcoming obamination.Diversationary tactics to keep Americans occupied.Your socialism is on steroids.Its none of this 2 steps forward and 1 step back-the usual modus operandus of the socialists.I saw this stuff 40 years ago.I do care because it will affect my bottom line.Americans in the poor house does affect me monetarally.You guys will be so broke.Yesterday was the forgiving of the deadbeats on credit cards.Bread and circuses indeed.
You want comedy.Alberta has 3.5 million people.Our yearly operating budget is 27 billion.Our medicare eats 40% of that budget and is still climbing as a voracious monster.This will be the first year in the last 16 that we show some red ink.Medicare and the bloated bureaucracy are the main culprits.DON T GO THERE.
Posted by: chicocano at April 24, 2009 02:11 PM (P2bg4)
Posted by: John ryan at April 24, 2009 02:14 PM (wHLW0)
Posted by: Daisy's Duke at April 24, 2009 02:15 PM (S7zPk)
Posted by: JS at April 24, 2009 02:29 PM (noZdG)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 24, 2009 02:31 PM (ympAm)
Posted by: JS at April 24, 2009 02:42 PM (noZdG)
"...arguing that persuasion rather than coercion had succeeded..."
Yeah, like "pretty please" worked so well up until that point.
Posted by: sfcmac at April 24, 2009 02:50 PM (kNmyI)
Other debunkings of the ex-FBI's article include serious time-line disparities (he says 'a few months', the CIA says 'within days,' ....
IOW, since the NYTimes printed it, it ain't safe to believe it.
Posted by: dad29 at April 24, 2009 04:08 PM (bL1lh)
Need to know before buying lace wigs Our lace wigs are made of human hairs classified lace human hair wigs on our web. 100% Indian/Chinese remy human hair and best quality Swiss/French lace are used in lace human hair wigs. Lace human hair wig is thin, your scalp can get good breath, so you can feel comfortable just like real hair. You may find hundreds of units and almost 150+ styles of full lace wigs in our store. By using our web searcher, you may locate just the wigs you want without bitter searches. Also, you may customise lace front wigs here, all you need to do is just to follow our custom options or leave your specials in the "comments". A custom wig can be completed within 25 workdays generally. Thanks for Paypal and our Co-work World Wide Ship corporations, we can ship wigs to all over the world! Show your beauty, show your individuality, experience our wonderful service and dress you up right now!
http://www.royalmewigs.com
Posted by: royalmewigs at April 24, 2009 04:40 PM (bYMNY)
The only bright spot in any of the Abu Griahb Ver 2.0 is that most Americans don't give a shit if we give some bomb chucker a little hydration therapy. The loudest ones are those who still have some hardon for Chimpy McHaliburton Nazi and are trying to relive their glory days of complete detachment from reality. Oh sure, there are many that will say to their Prius driving friends (sorry couldn't reisit) it's just terrible what we've done and how Europe thinks we're meanies, Thanks goodness Obama fixed that with the Jimmah Carter reunion tour!
Meanwhile most Americans are saying....What? That's all we did? Compared to lopping his head off or flying a plane into the building where his Mom works who gives a shit? God forbid if we get hit hard again because Chebama just opened himself up for a massive political problem.
Posted by: Flyguy03 at April 24, 2009 05:45 PM (FDomG)
Can we make the jihaddies spend a night with Barney Frank? Now thats torture, the horror, the pain, the humiliation!
Posted by: Vladmir Putin at April 24, 2009 08:14 PM (0Qynq)
So, the cops can taser someone for merely being drunk and/or and disorderly, but the CIA can't waterboard a known murderous terrorist perp because that's "torture".
Heh.
And waterboarding's not necessary, eh? Then where are the documents showing Al Qaeda hardcases singing like Susan Boyle w/o being subjected to "enhanced" techniques??
Posted by: effinayright at April 25, 2009 09:13 AM (Odl8J)
Posted by: JGsez at April 25, 2009 03:02 PM (WWllr)
Posted by: royalmewigs at April 26, 2009 06:13 PM (a7HM/)
Posted by: asdfsadf at May 12, 2009 11:21 PM (85HLz)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









