October 28, 2008
— Ace I never was all that big into this idea. I think it's now necessary if we're ever going to start winning like we used to.
The GOP needs to do its part, too. It shouldn't be up to John Hawkins to compile a list of House GOP challengers. The GOP needs a permanent online liaison, not just charged with sending out press releases and that sort of thing, but with providing information about candidates -- who's vulnerable, who's a solid challenger, etc.
I wrote someone a while ago asking them specifically where I should ask readers for help in phone banking and GOTV. There wasn't a reply.
I also wrote back to Hawkins:
you know what we really need to promote? Grassroots candidate
recruitment. We gave up a couple of elections this cycle for want of
a candidate.think of all the military types (and doctors, and farmers, teachers, businessmen,
etc.,) we reach. We have to convince them to put their hats in the
ring in 2010.We need to tell them there's a briefing book the party hands out that
will tell them the right position on all the issues they don't give a
shit about.Which are most of them, really, assuming they're not mutants.
We need to start recruiting solid candidates early.
And seriously -- if your life has been mostly scandal-free, and if you've achieved some distinction in your field (especially military-- Good Lord, we should own this one), guess what? You're a solid candidate for Congress or the statehouses.
It doesn't matter that you don't know all the issues. The only people who know all the issues are currently either serving as legislators or are lobbyists, and they don't know all the issues, either.
The Democrats have their recruitment pipeline-- lawyers, bureaucrats. The GOP has a much bigger and better talent pool, but we don't exploit it.
I'm not sure why. I think it's because so many people assume, "Gee, I could never do that."
Well, of course you could. If the Democrats can put up one hack lawyer after another, why isn't a Master Sergeant war hero a good candidate?
We need an army of Sarah Palins in 2010.
Look at Joe the Plumber. Pretty sharp guy. pretty likable. He doesn't have the alleged credentials to be a Congressmen -- by which I mean he's not a hack trial lawyer or sub-bureaucrat at the Department of Cutting Checks for People Who Don't Work. So what? He's got what it takes -- he's bright, politically interested, presentable, and, if he does decide to run, backed by a major political party.
I think an awful lot of people fit this profile.
Especially military men and women.
For God's sakes, guys: You know you have a better than even chance of winning just by showing up?
Think about it as just a slightly distasteful new tour of service. One one hand, you'll be surrounded by mutants and halfwits. On the other hand, no one will be shooting at you and there will be lots of free barbecue and (weak) chicken cordon blue.
On Military Candidates...
A military guy (name withheld) writes...
Well, of course you could. If the Democrats can put up one hack lawyer after another, why isn't a Master Sergeant war hero a good candidate?
Ask David Bellavia. McCain called him and asked him to run. The GOP in NY called and asked him to run. He announced his candidacy and three days later a multi-millionaire businessman in the district announced. Then the GOP asked David to drop out because this guy could self-finance. So Bellavia looks like a douche for entering a race that they didnt want him in. So, you lose one pissed off medal of honor nominee that would have been a good candidate but at least the GOP got their self-financer.
2 years ago I went to weekly meetings at the RNC. I mentioned one day that the GOP was pissing off veterans, a reliable constituency. I told them how they could fix that. My thanks was to never be invited back since, despite the fact that I am a reliable conservative.
Make no mistake, elections are expensive, the RNC has limited funds, and for both parties, self-financing (or at least name recognition which leads to good fundraising) is increasingly important.
However, the GOP should know that everyone on the right side of the internet would constantly link the donation page for any war hero running for Congress (or a state house). And the readers would donate.
We just need some coordination on this.
I'm pretty sure I can guarantee that any war hero running for Congress would be effectively self-financing.
Or rather, you guys can guarantee that.
Pete Olson... is a Navy vet running for DeLay's old carved-up district.
True enough, it's a Republican tilting district.
But frankly, we're going to need solid challengers in some Republican-tilting districts -- we've been losing them lately -- and they win in swing districts, too.
Ask the Democrats. They ran several neophyte politicians from the military in 2006 and pretty much won them all.
It's time for the party hacks to step aside and let the veterans run.
The party hacks haven't done a whole much for us lately, but the veterans have done an awful lot.
Thanks to Dave in Texas for that.
And really -- I shouldn't be updated on this stuff from cobloggers. Not to overstate my importance, but the internet is a huge fundraising and name-recognition machine. Honestly, the GOP should have us on conference calls every week.
Not for bullshit getting-the-message out. They do that. And we do get the message out.
But to be more involved in this. As in, making some decisions and offering input.
Personally the prospect of yet another conference call where I get the talking points I already knew (based on common sense) and was already getting out anyway isn't all that appealing.
Right bloggers have let the team down. Or at least I have. I personally spend too much time campaigning against the media and not enough time campaigning for actual candidates.
It's a hard habit to break -- I really don't want to do the team rah-rah thing. I can do it a bit, but it's against my nature.
But the GOP has to be a bit savvier about this, too. The internet is not just a vehicle for putting out press releases and posting YouTube ads, you know.
And back to military candidates: I have trouble supporting career politicians. Why? Because I assume they're pretty douchey.
I'm pretty sure my assumption is mostly correct.
I don't like politicians. Even the ones on our side.
I don't have that aversion with military people -- quite the opposite. Or distinguished citizens stepping up to do their bit for the country.
Posted by: Ace at
08:57 AM
| Comments (220)
Post contains 1148 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Dave at October 28, 2008 09:01 AM (Xm1aB)
RINOs need not apply.
Posted by: Roy at October 28, 2008 09:01 AM (cB77O)
Posted by: gp at October 28, 2008 09:01 AM (B9rV2)
Actually, if this race is any indication, we should be looking at aerobics instructors and the PTA.
I'm not entirely kidding.
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 09:02 AM (zHoxL)
I think it's because we're busy being doctors, teachers, military, farmers, and businessmen, etc.
Posted by: runninrebel at October 28, 2008 09:03 AM (0n9wc)
Posted by: Dave at October 28, 2008 09:04 AM (Xm1aB)
Scandal free? Hell, I live in Mass. I could eat a baby on the Boston Common and get the nod if I was a Dem.
Unfortunately, I'd be running as a Republican and that is a scandal in Mass that is insurmountable.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 28, 2008 09:04 AM (VBon8)
Posted by: Ryan Frank at October 28, 2008 09:05 AM (tPQKj)
Among the types of conservatives you've described here, I don't think it's a case of "I could never do that" as opposed to a case of "I would never do that!"
Whereas it's pretty normal for folks on the left to flock to work in government positions, that usually isn't the case for conservatives who tend to see government as a necessary evil at best.
Posted by: Bordo at October 28, 2008 09:05 AM (Ajit0)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at October 28, 2008 09:06 AM (ul7te)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6bwne7
Posted by: Jazz at October 28, 2008 09:06 AM (hnq5i)
"..-- if your life has been mostly scandal-free, "
Well, it was fun while it lasted. Anyway, not being a citizen might be a problem too.
Posted by: Holdfast at October 28, 2008 09:07 AM (Gzb30)
Of course, to go along with this will be the need to develop a donor base. Even running for City Council of a city of a couple of hundred thousand people runs in the several tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. We cannot have all our candidates forced to be self-financed. Frankly, finding the money for such an effort is far bigger challenge than finding the candidates.
Thank you, John McCain and your sympathetic incumbent buddies all over the country for making campaign financing, even for local bodies, so bloody hard for newcomers.
Posted by: Concerned for Our Liberties at October 28, 2008 09:07 AM (h3waA)
Posted by: incognito at October 28, 2008 09:07 AM (Rpam5)
Posted by: Jazz at October 28, 2008 09:08 AM (hnq5i)
Posted by: Slublog at October 28, 2008 09:08 AM (R8+nJ)
Posted by: IC at October 28, 2008 09:09 AM (jZNCU)
Conservatives are usually too busy doing important things like earning a living to get into politics.
It's the same reason there aren't more people at various anti-war marches. Those
who would counter protest are usually working.
Posted by: McLovin at October 28, 2008 09:09 AM (RwvN1)
Posted by: Holdfast at October 28, 2008 09:09 AM (Gzb30)
Ace, why don't you run for office? You already provide a valuable public service by reducing the hobo population. Plus you're the Conservative Blogger of the Year.
You're a lock!
Posted by: EC at October 28, 2008 09:09 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Editor at October 28, 2008 09:10 AM (GTpOW)
I've already planned on losing my alias in a couple years and running.
You will hear from me; mark my words.
D.A.
Posted by: Devil's Advocate at October 28, 2008 09:10 AM (de8zt)
I'd say military veterans. Plenty of damn good women out there, too.
Posted by: Jazz at October 28, 2008 09:10 AM (hnq5i)
Posted by: billypaintbrush at October 28, 2008 09:11 AM (sE1TD)
I followed that discussion up with another talk to a campaign worker in Colorado.
The overarching problem here is that McCain's National Campaign is in disarray. There is no top down functioning and the reporting from the satellites to the top is slow and awkward. I read here and elsewhere, 'why doesn't McCain do this?'
McCain's campaign cannot respond, does not respond to information from the field. There is a laxity and lack of a defined organization that is making it impossible for him to stay fresh and cohesive.
So, YES WE NEED A RIGHTROOTS and McCain won't give it to us. I am of the opinion that in my little interaction with the NRCC, they won't do it either. There is a lack of seriousness in our party, a serious that demands structure and organization. So LET'S DO IT. Are we not the party (unpaid) anyway?
Posted by: jawbone at October 28, 2008 09:11 AM (JalPh)
Heh, JackStraw. You beat me to it.
Ted Kennedy drowns a woman. One of Barney Frank's boyfriends runs a brothel in their Georgetown basement and another helps run Fannie Mae into the ground. No problem say the good people of the Commonwealth of Idiots.
Put an "R" next to your name, though, and it'd be off to Salem for the barbeque.
Posted by: Andy at October 28, 2008 09:12 AM (C3mTI)
Posted by: ntac at October 28, 2008 09:13 AM (jYyFD)
Disgruntled ex-girlfriends...check.
Arrested for fighting...check.
Sued for it...check.
Declared bankruptcy...check.
Idiotic leftard radicalism in my twenties...oh, that's a big check.
I can haz nomination?
No?
How come?
(because there are better men and women out there who didn't spend half their lives doing everything possible to fuck it up, that's why.)
Posted by: Milesdei at October 28, 2008 09:14 AM (ACHxk)
How about we run all the Fox news babes. We know they can speak with a teleprompter and they are all smoking hot. Megyn could slip on those glasses and ..... ahem. Yea, well she'd win in a walk in any district and you know it.
We can always get more Fox news babes from the hot babe farm where they are grown.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 28, 2008 09:15 AM (VBon8)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at October 28, 2008 09:16 AM (lhxhu)
This is a serious question, coz I really want to know - what encompasses a scandal if someone wants to enter political life as a Republican?
Buying a tanning bed.
Posted by: Jim62sch at October 28, 2008 09:16 AM (zYagu)
Posted by: jp at October 28, 2008 09:17 AM (DFDtC)
There might be state legislators that serve because they believe that they can make a difference. And these same people might run for Congress to do the same. But who wants to put up with all the BS? Unless they are just power-hungry?
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 28, 2008 09:17 AM (ioTid)
Yeah she's really helped out. The fact is you guys are all bullshit and no substance and have been since Reagan. The last intelligent person you ran was Nixon and maybe he was too smart.
W! Ooops! Macaca man! No wait! Fred! Fuck! Mittens! Urgh! Sarracuda! Goddammit!
What conservatives need is less Lord of the Flies you fat dummy.
Posted by: frito at October 28, 2008 09:18 AM (ZmMai)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 09:18 AM (clO3l)
I have battled the RNC since 1992 to set up a GOTV effort and fund it to party build an organization to beat the democrats. And each election been turned away. The RNC keeps thinking that all you have to do is the old style politics and that was enough.
GOP campaigns blow too much money on traditional media and not enough to organize itself. I still keep getting emails from the GOP that places the entire burden of the GOP effort on me and other supporters and none on party itself.
The GOP can only succeed if it changes the way it does campaigns.
Posted by: William Amos at October 28, 2008 09:19 AM (q6AjC)
My undergrad degree is in mathematics. We didn't exactly have rousing political discussions built into our curriculum, so I don't really know whether your assertion is true or not. I can only say that I didn't run into it, and I didn't see a bunch of Marxist propaganda on any of the campuses of any of the I attended (which numbered five - I took a LONG time to finish college).
Posted by: Jazz at October 28, 2008 09:19 AM (hnq5i)
The way to handle this, in my opinion, is to change how legislators are paid. Right now, in most cases, they get a salary and (ridiculously-good and expensive) health and retirement benefits. Instead of doing that, states and the Federal government should pay legislators their equivalent salary had they stayed on the job and reimburse the employer the full cost of the legislator's salary and benefits (so that the employer can afford to hire someone temporarily to take their spot and so that the legislator can stay on the employer's health insurance and retirement plan).
Self-employed? No problem. You are paid the requisite fraction of whatever your stated income was for the last year.
Unemployed? Here's your flat salary amount and bare-bones benefit package.
This does two things in my opinion: it encourages good, productive people to go into politics for the right reason, and it encourages employers to allow their employees to do it.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at October 28, 2008 09:19 AM (E3Yxq)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at October 28, 2008 09:19 AM (ioTid)
I'm currently debating staying in higher education, or moving back down the ladder to teach in high school. If I do so, I'll probably try to return home to Western MD and teach there. I've also considered that if I do so, Congressman Bartlett is getting up in years, and a replacement could be needed sooner rather than later (I think he'll win again this year). It would be something I'd be interested in, should I follow that path.
Posted by: Sean at October 28, 2008 09:19 AM (tqHDd)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 09:21 AM (clO3l)
Yeah, I could never run. Too many skeletons in the closet.
Damn, if someone had told me that all those things I did as a teenager and in my early 20's would come back to bite me in the ass...maybe I would've made a better decision.
Oh well, such is life. But I can support people!
Speaking of, down here in South Georgia, we have a long serving Democratic Congressman who runs unopposed every stinking time.
Any Ace of Spades readers in the area want to run against this guy?
Posted by: WunderKraut at October 28, 2008 09:21 AM (Jys/H)
Posted by: socky at October 28, 2008 09:22 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 28, 2008 09:23 AM (0+Ggj)
Posted by: socky at October 28, 2008 09:23 AM (PLvLS)
I hear ya. I'm pretty sure there are photos of me from my youth in the photo albums of people I don't even know any more which would disqualify me from ever running for any office higher than ticket agent at a Grateful Dead show.
Posted by: sandy burger at October 28, 2008 09:24 AM (VC56G)
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 28, 2008 09:24 AM (a00go)
Posted by: politicalmuse at October 28, 2008 09:24 AM (Yte3t)
Except that I'm terrified of loud noises and large crowds of people.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at October 28, 2008 09:27 AM (SHR5S)
Posted by: socky at October 28, 2008 09:27 AM (PLvLS)
Disagreement: We have to replace or destroy the current GOP power structure. It gave us massive porkers and a Democrat Lite party. We thought we could socialize by half and win. If our party simply looks like the Democrats with a slightly different face, then what's the point?
Major issue: We have to separate the public from the indoctrination and propaganda of our existing institutions.
Start with the media. It is dying by itself, but it's too slow and it will create a vacuum. I like the idea of a national conservative paper a la USA Today. I think it needs local news as well, and local advertising. Since it's all computers and printers, that shouldn't be so hard to accomplish. But someone needs to report on the crazies in city hall, the local schools, and so on.
Something has to replace liberal nightly news, and Fox won't do it. Fox is not news, it's commentary, and a lot of people can only take so much of O'Reilly. We need more Britt Humes, but he apparently is being replaced by Glenn Beck, if the rumors are correct. Sure, I like Glenn, but it's more of the same. If Beck replaces Hume, there will be no real news on Fox. And no, I don't think Shep really cuts it. Nightly news has to have national news, local news, local sports, and so on.
The schools have to be destroyed. Radical, I know (cue "We don't need no education...") but we ain't getting education now. We are getting indoctrination by liberals out of liberal colleges, and the latest propaganda from the teachers union. That has to change. We need to demand the 3 Rs, and nothing else. Okay, ramp up PE and recess and run the little buggers, but that's it.
Someone needs to start monitoring state universities. We need to expose the insanity in the most of the "soft" disciplines, like the Humanities. We need to ask our state legislatures why our tax money has to go for anti-American indoctrination, pro-sodomy courses, atheistic indoctrination, and the rest of it. And if they can't clean it up, get rid of the politicians.
It's a tall order, but what else are we doing except wasting our time leaving posts like this one?
Posted by: Scott at October 28, 2008 09:28 AM (s0Yl6)
Posted by: sandy burger at October 28, 2008 09:28 AM (VC56G)
Which means we're left with the narcissistic halfwits who wants power so much they don't care about that.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 28, 2008 09:29 AM (SHHaV)
Posted by: CDR M at October 28, 2008 09:29 AM (y67bA)
If your looking for anyone with a sketchy, coke addled past littered with failures and commitment problems, I'm available.
Posted by: Bizarro Palin at October 28, 2008 09:30 AM (4s1it)
I've never been arrested or even gotten a speeding ticket. Embarrassing pictures of me have never shown up on the web. About the only bad thing would be my hellaciously awful SAT scores and college grades.
If I do this, I'm looking to you morons for the dough.
Posted by: Slublog at October 28, 2008 09:30 AM (R8+nJ)
I am going into business academia, studying entrepreneurship and hoping to inspire as many students as possible to go work for themselves. Them as seem amenable, I'll take to the pistol or rifle range and talk with about Austrian economics outside class time.
III
Posted by: Oldsmoblogger at October 28, 2008 09:32 AM (arEOF)
Waste of time. Most normal Conservatives are too right wing for the GOP.
I belive in the Second Amendment= Gun nut
Close the border= Racist, will alienate hispanics
Stop welfare to illegals=Racist, will alienate hispanics
Prosecute criminale=Racist
English for Gov business=Racist
Thats just the GOP, Dems will be far more unkind.
Posted by: Russell Ziskey at October 28, 2008 09:32 AM (LlaBi)
Maybe you can advertise this in the New York Times? They need all of the advertising money they can find, now that they are officially at junk status.
Posted by: andycanuck at October 28, 2008 09:33 AM (GGy7k)
What's the starting pay again?
Posted by: Eric at October 28, 2008 09:33 AM (wM/aS)
My skeletons are minimal. I do have enemies in academia (go figure) who would probably work to discount me. Only police booking was a noise violation (party) in college. No angry ex's. NRA member. Some small connections in the GOP infrastructure (mostly former students).
I do have a loose tounge sometimes. Not quite Joe Biden, but I have my moments. So a good speech writer (socky?) could help.
I gotta think about the big picture before dreaming like this.
Posted by: Sean at October 28, 2008 09:33 AM (tqHDd)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at October 28, 2008 09:33 AM (4s1it)
If a Republican has an email for "hawt teenie pr0nz" caught in his spam folder, the opposition would call him a pedophile.
Posted by: Glen at October 28, 2008 09:34 AM (L912U)
Posted by: IC at October 28, 2008 09:34 AM (jZNCU)
Posted by: dick at October 28, 2008 09:34 AM (f5+lB)
Posted by: new at October 28, 2008 09:34 AM (MobLv)
Posted by: Senator Rev. Dr. E Buzz Miller at October 28, 2008 09:34 AM (vFeQi)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 09:35 AM (clO3l)
Success in some field? - Damn. Only a stay-at-home dad with a minimally positive cash flow from real estate brokerage.
I think I would prefer more of a "man behind the curtain" role.
Posted by: jjmurphy at October 28, 2008 09:36 AM (6OPMS)
Posted by: SalvucciFumbles at October 28, 2008 09:36 AM (iXWvs)
I think it's probably more of "gee, why would I want to do that - life is so much more important to live than to politic."
Or "gee, look at how Republicans are treated by the press compared with the frauds, cheats, philanderers, racists, criminals, drug dealers, terrorists, best-selling authors and coke-snorters of the Democrat Party- why would I want to subject my family and myself to that kind of blatantly unfair destruction of my life and reputation while my opponents get off Scot-free?"
Posted by: Good Lt at October 28, 2008 09:36 AM (jH17H)
Posted by: Slublog at October 28, 2008 09:36 AM (R8+nJ)
If I do this, I'm looking to you morons for the dough.
Screw that. I saved all your blasphemous photoshops of The One. You'll be paying me if you hope to stay out of the reeducation camp.
Posted by: JackStraw at October 28, 2008 09:37 AM (VBon8)
Posted by: anonymous at October 28, 2008 09:38 AM (Vwqdb)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 28, 2008 09:38 AM (Ds4I5)
If you can't run (say, like me, you may have some peccadillo in your past that would be actively covered up by the press if you were a Dem, but will be front page news if you're a Rep.) You can do something very important to ensure that good conservative candidates make it onto the ballot.
Give `em money, and do it early. The earlier you give, the bigger impact that it will have.
The early money that a candidate receives lends legitimacy to their campaigns, and is a base for the next rounds of fundraising. A presidential candidate can spend 50% of their time during primary season on the phone, fundraising. Imagine the campaign that could be run if the candidate was freed to spend 100% of the time getting the message out, meeting the voters, eating regional ethnic foods. (A dream, but a worthy goal.)
One of the biggest advantages of a "RightRoots" would be the ability to have thousands of citizen-scouts in the farm leagues of city counsels, county commissions, and state houses, allowing the nurturing of up-and-comers.
I read a opinion piece the other day (Damn! I can't recall the link!) where someone pointed out that a breakdown of party discipline has cause us to nominate "superstar" candidates untethered from party discipline. So we get a "Maverick" or a "Clinton" who succeds by undermining the party. The RightRoots could be a good corrective.
Posted by: Beryl at October 28, 2008 09:39 AM (rtxgE)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 09:39 AM (clO3l)
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
I got an email overnight from Barak the Vote department@countrified.net. advertising for a new DVD "Barack Your World"
Seriously ... There's no feking way he should have my email address.
Posted by: Dave in PB at October 28, 2008 09:39 AM (CTSya)
Posted by: DelD at October 28, 2008 09:40 AM (Yw/4J)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 09:41 AM (clO3l)
Posted by: Slublog at October 28, 2008 09:41 AM (R8+nJ)
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 09:41 AM (zHoxL)
Posted by: brad at October 28, 2008 09:42 AM (zTZGo)
No drugs (Not that it matters to Democrats)
No arrests.
No photos.
Not much of anything, but that doesn't mean that the enemy won't create something to whine about.
Then again, I guess my blog hits will skyrocket as moonbats scour every page for words to use against me. That might be reason enough to run.That is if my real identity is linked to my alias. It is sure to come out so might as well just announce through a blog post.....
Posted by: Fred Fry at October 28, 2008 09:44 AM (JXdhy)
Posted by: Kaptain Amerika at October 28, 2008 09:45 AM (UHPcb)
You, ace, and Zo from machosauce are all guaranteed campaign donations from me if you are willing to risk your necks on our behalf.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at October 28, 2008 09:46 AM (SHR5S)
Posted by: AZED at October 28, 2008 09:46 AM (f2daL)
The very first thing and sine qua non has to be getting somebody at RNC who's conservative, ok in the Beltway but not of their clubby mindset, and who gets the outside-the-beltway vitality of the blogosphere.
Fortunately, Insty has linked the obvious and simple solution:
Fred.
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 09:46 AM (zHoxL)
The GOP/RNC can FOAD!
They'll never get another cent of my money. The money that I donated to the McCain campaign was the last.
Posted by: thebronze at October 28, 2008 09:47 AM (trCLk)
Posted by: AZED at October 28, 2008 09:48 AM (f2daL)
Anyway, who ever is serious about running for office will get campaign donations from me.
Posted by: IC at October 28, 2008 09:49 AM (jZNCU)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at October 28, 2008 09:49 AM (ltwze)
I'm happy to financially support candidates--and I've done so before--but I wouldn't consider running. I'd rather pay someone who's lived a life with a less "imaginative" interpretation of what's scandalous than I have. Heck, Uncle Sugar has adjudicated me pretty thoroughly, and I'm still nervous about what the dreck-merchants would unearth.
Also, the pay sucks. And I don't like to have more than one boss at a time--try, like, tens of thousands, if not more. And I wouldn't ask my wife to put up with the BS dirt-digging some lowlife journo is going to do.
If I did run, though, I'd change my name to Not Sure and run as the...you got it...candidate of compromise.
Posted by: railwriter at October 28, 2008 09:50 AM (nwEiU)
Posted by: blaster at October 28, 2008 09:50 AM (BiphJ)
Ah! Here's the article by Daniel Henninger about Sarah Palin:
The `graphs that I was thinking of:
"The established political pros let the selection process come to this. Presidential candidates such as John McCain and Barack Obama have become untethered from the discipline of party institutions, largely because the parties have lost coherence. So we get celebrity candidates made famous, fundable and electable by dint of their access to the Beltway media. For voters, this election is a national Hail Mary.
For nearly two years, all the major candidates have rotated through our lives as solitary personalities attended by careerist campaign professionals. Barack, Hillary, Rudy, Mitt, Mike, McCain. When the moment arrived to pick a running mate, input from the parties was minimal. That famous party boss, Caroline Kennedy, advised Barack Obama. They picked a three-decade denizen of the Senate. John McCain's obligation was himself and his endless slog to this big chance. "
Posted by: Beryl at October 28, 2008 09:51 AM (rtxgE)
Maybe I'm dreaming, but I sense that we are looking at some very profound shifts in How Things Are Done in this country, vis-a-vis the parties and the msm. I think the internet (and the gods of the internet, like the totally most awesome Ace of Spades) is opening a door to a whole new ballgame.
Just my humble opinion.
Posted by: CB at October 28, 2008 09:51 AM (9Wv2j)
This was also my point in decrying Eeyorism. Don't just whine, do something.
Good for Ace that he's finally come on board. Now maybe someone will listen.
The next step is setting up the framework.
Sidenote: I don't think people are aware: Kos and MyDD aren't making huge bank over the fact that they have blogads and millions of hits: they are making bank "administering" ActBlue and other online contributing networks. If Obama is elected I don't foresee any investigations into exactly how these funds are raised and administered, but any rightroots admin better look deeply into election finance rules before setting one up.
Posted by: ms. docweasel at October 28, 2008 09:52 AM (SOSlE)
I think that needs to be built as well; a manner of countering the absolute and bald faced, shameless lies and distortion the left traffics in as a matter of doing business. The unbelievable lies that Biden and Obama are engaging in are just stunning to me, how they are not even questioned or countered. Nobody says "huh?" publicly, it never is questioned in the debates.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 28, 2008 09:52 AM (0+Ggj)
We have a chance to get rid or Kerry and Frank this year. Is the GOP doing anything to help them? Mass gets written off election after election. The electorate is pretty much apathedtic about it. If the GOP took more of an interest in us, we might take more of an interect in them. We are not as liberal as everyone thinks.
Go Jeffrey K. Beatty Richard A Baker, and Earl Sholley (I had to look them up to make sure I spelled the names right)
John Tierneys the guy in my district. I never really hear much of him on the national scale. He seems to stay with the safe issues.
2008 Massachusetts elections
SENATOR IN CONGRESS
STATEWIDE
JOHN F. KERRY, 19 Louisburg Sq., Boston, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
JEFFREY K. BEATTY, 23 John Joseph Rd., Harwich, Republican
ROBERT J. UNDERWOOD, 83 Cherrelyn St., Springfield, Libertarian
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS
FIRST DISTRICT
JOHN W. OLVER, 1333 West St., Amherst, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
NATHAN A. BECH, 84 Summit St., West Springfield, Republican
FOURTH DISTRICT
BARNEY FRANK, 274 Grove St., Newton, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
EARL HENRY SHOLLEY, 8 Lakeshore Dr., Norfolk, Republican
SUSAN ALLEN, 122 Westbourne Ter., Brookline, I
SIXTH DISTRICT
JOHN F. TIERNEY, 21 Settlers Way, Salem, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
RICHARD A. BAKER, 288 Middle St., West Newbury, Republican
SEVENTH DISTRICT
EDWARD J. MARKEY, 7 Townsend St., Malden, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
JOHN CUNNINGHAM, 11 Overlook Ridge Dr., Revere, Republican
EIGHTH DISTRICT
THOMAS T. MERRIGAN, 23 Plum Tree Ln., Greenfield, Democratic, Candidate for Re-election
MICHAEL FRANCO, 45 Cedar Hill Rd., East Longmeadow, Republican
Posted by: redinbluestate at October 28, 2008 09:52 AM (RVQzd)
Now that is really the problem, isn't it?
The first thing we need to do is start a platform forum,
(Conservative convention?) and decide what we think a Conservative really is.
One thing has been painfully clear this time around, Republicans love to eat our own. We kill our own Candidate if we disagree on one issue. We have to be able to define ourselves as a group and reach some sort of consensus.
If we allow the current leadership to set the planks, we will have nothing but the same bull shit we've had for 8 years.
List every issue, and decide (in as large a group as possible) where we stand on that issue.
Then stand by that Platform and find Candidates that believe in it. You are right Ace, there are a ton of people that would run for office if they felt they would be even half assed safe (from thier own Party) when they did it.
Posted by: A. Weasel at October 28, 2008 09:53 AM (bqcfE)
The Ace of Spades Head Quarters Morons for Congress Action Commitee
AosHQ MCAC
One of you morons could probably come up with something better.
Posted by: Dave in PB at October 28, 2008 09:55 AM (CTSya)
Right on Ace.
The missing link its a platform like Kos for right leaning folks.
Using their web layout would work....one column for the people who run the site and guests, and another column for user articles.
Posted by: geoff at October 28, 2008 09:55 AM (8MLWh)
Which means we're left with the narcissistic halfwits who wants power so much they don't care about that.
This just about nails it.
I have no skeletons, but there is NO WAY I could handle the Left going after my husband and kids the way they went after Palin's. She has oodles of grace, I just have oodles of guns and the urge to use them.
Posted by: Redhead Infidel at October 28, 2008 09:55 AM (zlHbc)
Actually, I've considered running for office before, especially when politicians preen and prattle about bullshit energy ideas. My wife would be supportive because, well, she's a great lady, notwithstanding her choice of me for a husband. However, I'm not certain that I want my 2 (soon to be 3) small children being hounded by the press, if for no other reason than I would kick the ever living shit out of anyone who messed with my family.
Oh yeah, I'm a complete square, drug wise. I haven't even tried pot. According to some tool of a columnist (but I repeat myself), this would mean that I don't have anything in common with the average voter. So, you know, YMMV with me.
Posted by: physics geek at October 28, 2008 09:55 AM (MT22W)
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at October 28, 2008 09:56 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: toby928 at October 28, 2008 09:57 AM (PD1tk)
geoff said: The missing link its a platform like Kos for right leaning folks.
Using their web layout would work....one column for the people who run the site and guests, and another column for user articles.
There is a rapidly growing website called RegularFolksUnited that is set up along those lines. No point in re-inventing the wheel if it's already out there.
Posted by: Redhead Infidel at October 28, 2008 10:00 AM (zlHbc)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at October 28, 2008 10:02 AM (eiOZw)
State House and local elections often are won by a candidate getting 10-15k votes. You can literally shake hands with 80% of the voters in your district if you make the effort.
Posted by: toby928 at October 28, 2008 10:03 AM (PD1tk)
I am active in UNDERSTANDING politics, but I am indifferent, when it comes to actual politicians.
Heinlein had it right in Starship Troopers.
Longbows.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at October 28, 2008 10:03 AM (ul7te)
Ace,
This is something I made up my mind to do earlier this year. There are just not enough "true" conservatives in the government (both state and federal) and I figured "hey, why not me?". Here's where I encouter my stumbling blocks.
My life, to this point, has been rather ordinary. I'm only 27, and all I've really accomplished has been graduating from a pretty tough engineering university. I'm currently working my third job since college (left the first one, got let-go the second one, love the current one). Sure, I'm young and I've got time, but while I'm "waiting", what kind of things do I need to be doing to improve my credentials?
I'm movnig out to the strongly conservative suburbs of Chicago, a very strong conservative area oddly enough, and I figure I might as well get started now. My main questions is, how? How do I go about getting exposure to the Republican party here? How do I start making a name for myself in politics? What kind of things do I need to be doing in order to set myself up for a serious political career down the road?
If anyone has any insight, advice, etc., I'm all ears...er...eyes
Posted by: conservativeinthecity at October 28, 2008 10:04 AM (i3tSP)
Posted by: frito at October 28, 2008 10:05 AM (ZmMai)
Posted by: Redhead Infidel at October 28, 2008 10:05 AM (zlHbc)
Posted by: physics geek at October 28, 2008 10:05 AM (MT22W)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at October 28, 2008 10:07 AM (PonvG)
Yeah, retail is key at these levels. Honestly, one thing helping GOTV with door-knocking this cycle might do for some of you guys is get rid of your fear of soliciting strangers for votes.
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 10:09 AM (zHoxL)
If you are serious, you should be volunteering massively right now. Become a fixture at the party campaign headquarters to the point that everyone knows your name. Do whatever needs to be done eagerly. Use that youthful energy now. It will pay off later.
Posted by: toby928 at October 28, 2008 10:09 AM (PD1tk)
Anyone who has to support his or her family with a real job is out, for obvious reasons. You can't spend all day going door to door when you have mouths to feed.
The legend of Rick Santorum going door-to-door for support is true, but there's more to it. He was an insider of the PA state legislature prior to getting his House seat in 1990, and once you're "in" you're in.
So as I see it, you have no shot unless you're (a) "anointed" by your state government or are (b) independently wealthy. Neither strikes me as a class of people who are generally "squeaky fucking clean".
Posted by: Kozaburo at October 28, 2008 10:12 AM (z6XWS)
Posted by: Oldsmoblogger at October 28, 2008 10:12 AM (arEOF)
Posted by: CB at October 28, 2008 10:12 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: mr.frakypants at October 28, 2008 10:12 AM (PonvG)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at October 28, 2008 10:14 AM (ul7te)
@toby928
As Kozaburo points out right below you, I would LOVE to, but the time-factor is just too daunting. I've got a full-time job that I often find myself putting in extra hours. Not to mention the student loans and future mortgage to pay. What kinds of things are open to me considering my time restrictions? It just seems that anything I need to do to begin this trek requires the time commitment that I just don't have.
Posted by: conservativeinthecity at October 28, 2008 10:15 AM (i3tSP)
Posted by: Thomas E. Dewey '48 at October 28, 2008 10:16 AM (clO3l)
My understanding is that FredPAC is there to help get conservative people involved and elected at all levels of government. I'd bet they'd love to hear from some morons about running for local offices. I'll say the same thing I've told the Libertarians for years. If you want to put government back in the hands of the people, start by retaking municipal and county educational offices where the demorats have consolidated power and can really affect you and your children.
-- CR
Posted by: Cold Rage at October 28, 2008 10:18 AM (I5MWJ)
Posted by: CB at October 28, 2008 10:20 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: PR at October 28, 2008 10:22 AM (k7SeR)
Conservativeinthecity:
You can volunteer all weekend long. Just show up tonight at the HQ, say you want to GOTV all weekend. Check in thursday night for an hour, go by Friday night for a few hours, work your ass off all weekend long 12 hour days. Show up at 2-3pm on tuesday if possible and work the phones for them to push voters out, drive voters to the polls.
Then, you have credibility for the next two years.
Any other strategy is just blowing smoke and talking shit.
Posted by: geoff at October 28, 2008 10:23 AM (8MLWh)
Posted by: TomJW at October 28, 2008 10:24 AM (xRCpL)
CB,
It's definitely not a small town. It's a very large suburban area just outside of Chicago. Think just north of O'Hare airport, if that means anything to you.
I really should sit down and talk with my cousin about this. He has run twice now for the state senate spot for the district I am moving to. The only problem is, he's a Democrat. I know how he worked his way up though. He's a fireman who has worked himself up the ranks and got a spot on the union board. Thankfully though, he keeps losing to the Republican incumbant
Not sure if talking to him would be a real benefit, but it's that "what's my first step?" part that's the hardest/trickiest one. Perhaps there's nothing for me to really do until I complete my move and I'm able to start volunteering/working with the various conservative groups there.
Posted by: conservativeinthecity at October 28, 2008 10:25 AM (i3tSP)
Posted by: CDR M at October 28, 2008 10:27 AM (Mv/2X)
A. Mine has been, aside from a few speeding tickets my entire life has been consistently safe and there are no skeletons in my closet (unless someone gets word about that obsession I have with Kathy Ireland, but that aside)... Married my highschool sweetheart, never even tried marijuana , but;
B. I don't want the press asking my kids' friends (via their Myspace pages) if I've ever done something like, say, patted them on the back if they've done something good or, say, pick them up & hold them if they've fallen & hurt themselves. You know, "Republican touched a 9 year old". I know what they'll do to me, no matter how 'good' I've been. I know they'll go back five years & demand a a receipt (that I've probably lost) for that $X charitable deduction. I know they'll find some fake friend to swear they heard me say "ni$$er". After what happened to Joe the plumber, I don't need the hassle; Heck, Jack Ryan took his wife to a legal club - his own freaking wife - and the party of Clinton forced him from opposing the Messiah because of the 'scandal'. They.checked.Clarence.Thomas's.movie.rentals.
C. I don't have the need to have roughly 50% of people hate my guts simply because I declare myself a conservative Republican;
D. The next-to-last thing I want to do is hang out with a bunch of country-club Republicans at dinner parties, giving boring speeches and dropping to one knee & begging for campaign money;
E. Beating out the previous item, the absolute last thing I want to do is go to work at a chamber where I spend my day with elected Democrats (who are going to try to use "B" from above in order to smear me, my family, my colleagues, etc.), and, even worse, talk to the fucking political press. Chances are I'd be arrested for assault after the first interview.
Oh, yeah, I forgot, I couldn't take the pay cut, anyway. Hey, I'm a Republican, thus I earn.
Jokes aside, after the last 2 weeks, I can't imagine why anyone would want to entre the fray against the Newsweek/MSNBC/NYT assault on your very humanity.
Posted by: RW at October 28, 2008 10:28 AM (5L9k4)
Posted by: CB at October 28, 2008 10:30 AM (9Wv2j)
Because otherwise, they win.
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 10:31 AM (zHoxL)
Posted by: ZD at October 28, 2008 10:32 AM (6Reid)
Speaking of, down here in South Georgia, we have a long serving Democratic Congressman who runs unopposed every stinking time.
Any Ace of Spades readers in the area want to run against this guy?
The problem is he's in a gerrymandered district.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at October 28, 2008 10:41 AM (ujg0T)
I believe in the Second Amendment= Gun nut
Close the border= Racist, will alienate hispanics
Stop welfare to illegals=Racist, will alienate hispanics
Prosecute criminale=Racist
English for Gov business=Racist
Thats just the GOP, Dems will be far more unkind.
Sad but true. the whole Wall Street Journal / eastern establishment apparatus has effectively shut many true patriots out.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at October 28, 2008 10:42 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Slublog at October 28, 2008 02:30 PM (R8+nJ)
If I read right that you're in Maine, I would donate. Turning Maine red would seriously piss off that douchebag Stephen King.
Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at October 28, 2008 10:47 AM (N8clX)
"One thing has been painfully clear this time around, Republicans love to eat our own. We kill our own Candidate if we disagree on one issue. "
Oh really? Plenty of us have issues with McCain but still back him. Or haven't you heard?
"If we allow the current leadership to set the planks, we will have nothing but the same bull shit we've had for 8 years."
The planks are chosen by committees already, and any of them can be challenged.
"List every issue, and decide (in as large a group as possible) where we stand on that issue."
Sounds like what the party does now.
"Then stand by that Platform and find Candidates that believe in it. ."
LOL, simple as that. there is a mechanism in place to do that now and it's called the GOP. Issues-obsessed noobs have been huffing and puffing and coming and going and issuing ultimatums over principles for decades, and guess who's left when they stomp out the door? The sorry old stalwarts who know how to raise the money and make phone calls and invite strangers to fundraisers in their living rooms and show up at meeting after bloody meeting...(so, how's that Reform Party thing working out?)
No one really wants to do the work. Not for very long anyway. Yeag I'm a GOPer and I have a grudging respect for those old farts who manage the local central committees and state parties year in and year out. Good luck setting up another one. The only ones who stick with it are the very motivated religious or anti-religious nuts that you despise.
Oh and you candidates better have a nice family for brochure pics & some local accomplishments and affiliations. They can spot the drifters a mile away.
Posted by: carol at October 28, 2008 10:48 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 28, 2008 10:51 AM (xpwWQ)
Posted by: kat-missouri at October 28, 2008 10:52 AM (GxnBZ)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at October 28, 2008 10:54 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at October 28, 2008 10:55 AM (ujg0T)
Sorry Carrol, even his post and your response confirms the theory that we eat our own. I suggest a name change for the party. Republicannibals.
Every past effort to organize us into some sort of "right-roots" group has fallen to petty infighting and eventual complacency and boredom. My personal belief is that what we lack is a Soros-like figure on this side, who will finance the effort long enough to get past the startup fights and then bridge the funding gap as people fall away for various reasons. With this we could reach a critical mass that would be self sustaining.
Posted by: TBinSTL at October 28, 2008 10:56 AM (2vLkB)
Posted by: Swegin at October 28, 2008 11:00 AM (q0Z3p)
Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 28, 2008 11:02 AM (xpwWQ)
Posted by: Swegin at October 28, 2008 11:08 AM (q0Z3p)
So we can elect whoever we want, and even start new political parties, but as long the left controls how education is down, as long as the schools keep cranking out hordes of ill-educated, semi-ignorant marxist drones, we're just pissing into the wind.
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 28, 2008 11:12 AM (FO+YO)
OregonMuse,
I will be homeschooling my children. In fact there are so many homeschoolers in my church (we have about 1,000 in attendance over two services so we aren't a huge church), they've formed two separate co-ops. I never thought I'd do that, but I'll be damned if I'm going to give my kids to the government for six or seven hours a day. My children are zoned for what is supposed to be an excellent private school, but it doesn't matter to me. I want to raise independent thinkers. Homeschooling has exploded of late. I know everyone can't do it, but it offers a little bit of hope.
Posted by: Niclun at October 28, 2008 11:21 AM (rjHmV)
Yeah, it's gerrymandered, but....well, let's just say that he's always gotten the Jamie Foxx type of Obama vote.
Posted by: RW at October 28, 2008 11:21 AM (5L9k4)
Well said ace. The time for standing in the background, waiting for our voices to be validated by the current leadership is coming to an end. I think the online community as a whole dramatically underestimates the effect it has on the overall political discourse of this nation. And while it is cathartic to rail against the massive media bias in the US today, it is high time the thousands of lawyers, businessmen, cab drivers, and yes, even plumbers get together and start doing something about it.
If a website devoted to worshiping Paul Anka and the strangling/cooking of hobos can take a fence-sitter like me into a willing participant in this brave new world, then think of what the other 99,999 unique visitors to this site every month can do if pointed towards the singular goal of making our voice heard in the political process so many of us dedicate so much of our time to.
Look at the how many normal, everyday joes readily offered support in any way possible when the request for volunteers/donations was made in the "vetting the media" thread. I think that shows that people are ready, willing, and able to help in any way they possibly can to see that our collective voices are heard.
So ace, more of this talk please; I thnk I speak for a number of readers here when I say its about fucking time we put our efforts into something that will ensure our voice is heard, and that we take the steps necessary to change the landscape of the GOP to one we can all be proud of.
-V
Posted by: veritas at October 28, 2008 11:23 AM (5Chyr)
Posted by: lions at October 28, 2008 11:24 AM (+q06x)
all my kids are homeschooled, too, and they're in college now. So yes, I agree that is an excellent solution. But everyone is not going to want to or is able to do this, and we've got to do something to keep kids from being bombarded with leftist ideology every time they step into the classroom.
Posted by: OregonMuse at October 28, 2008 11:24 AM (FO+YO)
We really need somebody who can artfully explain, using small words and short sentences, just exactly what conservatism is, how it works, how the whole world benefits from it, shit like that. Other topics include how capitalism works, why it's not good to pay half or more of your income in taxes, why vegetables are good for you, and the proper way to stalk hobos for fun and profit (and it's really good exercise, too).
Count me in for the Director of Internet Information Outreach.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 28, 2008 12:06 PM (ZGhSv)
Posted by: Iblis at October 28, 2008 12:11 PM (9221z)
Posted by: Jeff at October 28, 2008 12:30 PM (arKX6)
Posted by: hutch1200 at October 28, 2008 12:34 PM (VxPLw)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at October 28, 2008 12:47 PM (0+Ggj)
Posted by: Fritz at October 28, 2008 12:56 PM (UU4Hu)
Posted by: Jones at October 28, 2008 01:17 PM (KOkrW)
Posted by: Ann NY at October 28, 2008 01:34 PM (nG/mN)
Posted by: Ann NY at October 28, 2008 01:45 PM (nG/mN)
If you live in a conservative area that routinely votes D, run as a D.
Posted by: RayJ at October 28, 2008 01:51 PM (87de7)
angry libertarian in connecticut here.
i haven't been arrested in years.....i have a job and pay most of my taxes....and i didn't get a VIP deal on my mortgage.
send me money.
Posted by: e.koenig at October 28, 2008 02:58 PM (2J+Vs)
On the other hand, I would sew up the strip club and porn demographic. Totally.
Posted by: SGT Dan at October 28, 2008 04:21 PM (u2aRf)
Posted by: Dave in Georgia at October 28, 2008 04:42 PM (lXVgd)
Here's some friendly advice. How about not purposefully alienating the entire moderate wing of your already minority party?
Says the moron voting enthusiastically for the most extreme, hardest left candidate ever to run for high office in the United States.
Here's some friendly advice: You're not very bright, your lack of self awareness is embarrassing, and no one here gives a shit what you think.
Posted by: VJay at October 28, 2008 04:42 PM (k87Wm)
Run Palin/Jindal in 2012. Lose by 18%. I wouldn't mind a bit.
Fuckin' funny. That would be a Republican-favoring massacre of Reagan-Mondale proportions, no matter which unaccomplished, effete, effeminate blubbering pussy you clowns chose to run against them. But at least you've got a stable full to choose from.
You seem to forget that your pretend "majority" party has a little decades-long problem winning the White House. And, even if Obama frauds his skinny fascist ass into the Oval, it's going to be by the skin of his teeth (and, you know, massive organized fraud).
But like I said, you're not very bright.
Posted by: VJay at October 28, 2008 04:48 PM (k87Wm)
Ace - Could you forward my email address to Dave in Texas? Id like to chat with him about his views on my Texas Congressional District.
I meet the criteria, Ace (except the military hero part). My father did that for me, fighting hand-to-hand in knee-deep mud up the "Island Chain" to the Japan Homeland in 1944-45.
After listening to me vent, he asked me last night (hes 83 and weak from the second round of chemo) what happened to the ideals for which he and his men fought (and nearly all died). I decided right then that, at 53, its time to gird-up.
Im tired of being angry. Im tired of listening to our sacred Constitution twisted by twits (Im a top ten law school grad and know damn well what it really says). And, Im tired of a Republican Party that refuses to fight.
Dad answered the call when it came; its time I did as well. This fight is no less important .
Posted by: oneyedman at October 28, 2008 06:38 PM (2HVuf)
Posted by: cheshirecat at October 28, 2008 06:50 PM (wJK1S)
Posted by: cheshirecat at October 28, 2008 06:59 PM (wJK1S)
Posted by: cheshirecat at October 28, 2008 07:57 PM (wJK1S)
Mouth-foaming rage? Uh, no.
Posted by: someone at October 28, 2008 09:06 PM (zHoxL)
Posted by: seattle slough at October 28, 2008 09:41 PM (LyEqc)
Posted by: nuncproturd at October 28, 2008 10:03 PM (o3yZA)
I'd consider it if I didn't have massive mortgage and student loan with two young'uns, but I also live in GA-11, not GA-2. That could be a problem.
But, it's something I've thought about starting to do really, really locally - but I'm not too crazy about putting my family through living hell, either.
Posted by: Francase at October 30, 2008 05:12 AM (nrLPb)
The GOP is all about top-down control. They don't WANT bloggers getting more involved. They'd be happy if bloggers raised money, but THEY want to decide who to spend it on, which means for the most part spending it on Democrats-Lite.
If bloggers get more involved in political activism then it has to be in acting as a counter-weight to the useless Chamber of Commerce Republicans who currently are running the party into the ground. Simply sending more money to the same incompetent liberals is insane - it will get us more Bush's, McCain's, Stevens, etc.
This will be even more difficult than it sounds, as many "right wing bloggers" are in fact pro-war-liberals.
Posted by: flenser at October 30, 2008 08:34 AM (1KC1c)
Posted by: Rihana at July 17, 2009 05:59 PM (odp+k)
Posted by: Hera at August 18, 2009 04:29 PM (qGMIj)
Posted by: steven605 at September 07, 2009 02:53 AM (E6tGG)
Thank you..
Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacılık Brnckvvtmllttrhaberi
Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacılık Brnckvvtmllttrhaberi
Posted by: Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacı at February 13, 2010 05:06 PM (G0i8M)
Auto Insurance Health Insurance Life Insurance
Posted by: chn at February 24, 2010 09:44 PM (zpsjV)
Posted by: silence at May 12, 2010 08:50 PM (wLVwM)
Intimately, the post is actually the best on this laudable
topic. I harmonize with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your
future updates. Saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the fantastic
lucidity in your writing. hangover movie acai berry
Posted by: joannarose27 at May 25, 2010 11:43 PM (+cDcg)
Posted by: iddaa at May 29, 2010 05:19 AM (QGoSQ)
reverse phone lookup
acai berry
Posted by: alica at June 23, 2010 11:08 PM (b3Ecq)
The Diet Solution
Cho Yung Tea
Posted by: Yeast Infection at July 09, 2010 01:32 AM (GizTl)
User can easily use iPhone bakup software to get the backup of iPhone and the backup is very helpful at the time of corruption or error in the iPhone.
Posted by: carolinebrown at July 10, 2010 08:01 AM (we6PZ)
Payday Loans
How To Get Rid Of Stretch Marks
How To Get Pregnant
Posted by: Halen Smith at July 13, 2010 04:14 AM (gPXMz)
Among the types of conservatives you've described here, I don't think it's a case of "I could never do that" as opposed to a case of "I would never do that!"
Whereas it's pretty normal for folks on the left to flock to work in government positions, tech blog that usually isn't the case for conservatives who tend to see government as a necessary evil at best.
Posted by: Joe at July 13, 2010 03:21 PM (SHhVV)
Acai Berries
Acai Berry Diet
How To Get Rid Of Stretch Marks
Posted by: paulbisley at July 28, 2010 08:51 AM (4Gx5x)
Posted by: Mike Singer at August 14, 2010 02:11 PM (nmykt)
Very good post.....the information you provided is Amazing thank you very much.
Acai Berry Supplements
Watch Movies Online Free
Posted by: Acai Berry at September 04, 2010 04:18 AM (cLi6x)
Posted by: eliminate belly fat at September 23, 2010 06:47 PM (xJitA)
Posted by: lose belly fat at September 30, 2010 06:35 PM (iC9aK)
Posted by: annasmith at January 07, 2011 05:15 AM (/OM8+)
kanlı canlı bir platform porno izle keyfine bak
sikiselim diyenler burası sikiş en güzeli
dedik ne bir bakınz vipdilber kaliteliyer
Posted by: zerdali bacı at January 12, 2011 10:18 AM (i5Tel)
Posted by: xadf at February 19, 2011 02:02 AM (z51sN)
Posted by: xadf at February 19, 2011 02:03 AM (z51sN)
Posted by: fdsf at February 19, 2011 02:05 AM (z51sN)
Posted by: acai berry weight loss at March 18, 2011 11:27 AM (NnnaI)
Posted by: laser cutters at May 18, 2011 03:05 AM (0uOHt)
* HD Vidéo Converter supporte la conversion de HD à AVI, MPEG, WMV, etc.
* Il vous offre des fonctions d'édition vidéo, y compris réduire, couper, régler la luminosité, la saturation, etc.
* HD Vidéo Converter supporte beaucoup d'appareils populaires comme ipad, ipod, iphone4, PSP etc.
Supported OS: Window 7/NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista1G Hz CPU ou supérieur
MTS Converter est un convertisseur vidéo puissant qui vous permet de convertir MTS en formats populaires de vidéo PC tels que AVI, MPEG, WMV, DivX, Xvid, MP4, mov, etc. MTS Converter supporte la conversion de MTS à des formats supportés par tous les dispositifs comme l'iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, téléphone mobile.
Posted by: HD Vidéo Convertisseur at June 12, 2011 10:19 PM (MW0H3)
Posted by: Rejuv at June 14, 2011 01:41 AM (rNB/M)
Posted by: tphone 4gs at June 14, 2011 10:54 PM (uKxzH)
Advertising is a kind of applied exposition and a method that enterprises introduce business, service or entertainment to customers or clients. Laser is a kind of light and many manufactures use its advantages to manufacture high-tech laser equipments like laser cutters, laser engravers, laser marking machine, laser welding machine, etc. How can the above two irrelevant things be connected together? In fact, laser technology has been widely used in many fields, including advertisement industry.
Materials like acrylic, double color sheet, glass, crystal, bamboo ware, ceramics, marble, paper, shell, rubber plate, resin, etc can be cut or engraved by these high-tech laser cutters or laser engraving machines. If you need both functions, you can choose laser engraver cutter. At present, laser cutting or engraving can be used in the field of advertisement, decoration, model (architecture model, aviation and navigation models, wooden toys), arts and crafts, printing and package, paper cutting.
Posted by: laser dieboard cutter at June 29, 2011 10:03 PM (zbokq)
polyurethane insole.
iPaymu.com Pembayaran Online Indonesia
Posted by: iPaymu.com Pembayaran Online Indonesia at July 08, 2011 01:19 PM (wfp1g)
Posted by: Wrinkle Cream Review at July 23, 2011 04:29 AM (u25sj)
Posted by: payday loans online at August 12, 2011 05:45 AM (EISac)
Metode Bisnis Online Memberikan Bukti Nyata
Posted by: Tips Blogspot at August 21, 2011 11:31 AM (o5/5f)
Posted by: RevitaDerm Cream at September 12, 2011 01:43 AM (FN6iJ)
Posted by: Cheap Payday Loan at September 23, 2011 02:53 AM (YZmki)
Posted by: How To Lose Love Handles at October 05, 2011 01:20 PM (440uG)
Posted by: Online Payday Loans at October 11, 2011 10:24 PM (rRNZ1)
Posted by: fdwef at November 07, 2011 12:34 AM (0rvPG)
Posted by: advance at January 05, 2012 10:39 AM (S6ywV)
Interesting post !!! i love to see it, when people need such
type of site. which has great information about this topic... Great for new
generation..
Thanks..
Posted by: fast energy at February 16, 2012 03:56 AM (K5LHf)
Posted by: Nike Requin at May 06, 2012 10:22 PM (/+b4o)
63 queries taking 2.4005 seconds, 454 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.







