August 10, 2008
— DrewM It's a Russian language report and unconfirmed at this point but it's just a reminder that there's still plenty of time for this to get even uglier.
An American has been taken prisoner by the Russian military. The American, noted to be African American, is thought to be one of the American trainers working in Georgia for the United States. The article notes he is being transferred to Vladikavkaz for further questioning.
The Georgians have made repeated efforts to arrange a "cease fire" but alas, the Russians are too busy attacking targets within Georgia to get back to them.
Russia has continued air raids deep inside Georgia, after it rejected Tbilisi's announcement that it had called a ceasefire and wanted talks.Jets bombed targets near Tbilisi, including the airport, and Russia said its warships had sunk a Georgian boat that approached and tried to attack.
Russia earlier took control of the breakaway region of South Ossetia, forcing Georgian troops to withdraw.
The US has accused Russia of seeking "regime change" in Georgia.
Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili told the BBC his forces had observed a ceasefire since 0500 on Sunday morning, but had still been bombed by Russian planes. He said his government had been trying "all day" to contact Russia to discuss a ceasefire.
Let it not be said western leaders have been totally feckless in their abandonment of the nominal allies in Georgia. No, many of them have taken the bold step of urging the Russians to stop and play nice. That should do the trick.
I understand that discussions are underway to determine which western Foreign Minister will be dispatched to Moscow to get Comrade Brezhnev's Putin's signature on a piece of paper declaring peace in our time.
I know the tone of this post is snarky, it's not because I don't appreciate the gravity of the situation but rather the opposite. The fact that for the moment the Russians have out maneuvered us is clear. I don't really blame US and other countries for not being able to do much, the other guys just beat us this time.
What I think is essential, though unlikely to happen, is that we face up to what this means.
Russia has been billed as a quasi-friend and budding ally over the last 15 or so years. There have been plenty of warnings, there always are that we in the west are mistaken about this, but it's too hard and to uncomfortable to deal with that unpleasant reality. So instead of hearing leaders admit they got the drop on us this time but now we're in the game, we'll hear talk about diplomatic efforts to get things back to where they were before this 'unfortunate incident'. Russia will still get invited to G8 summits, even though it's not really a free country as we understand the term. We'll probably slow the expansion of NATO and it will be harder to get bases in eastern Europe for our missile defense shield. In short, Russia aggression will be rewarded and emboldened and that is not a good thing.
Posted by: DrewM at
01:02 PM
| Comments (53)
Post contains 531 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: eman at August 10, 2008 01:06 PM (wOCCc)
America is so much softer than it was in the 80s, and we were soft then. Russia probably was a little nervous that we would protect our needed pipeline, but we've shown them they can loot, kill, and invade with impunity.
There is one benefit. If the world stands by and does nothing about this, then surely we can bomb Tehran. Tit for tat.
Posted by: ghy at August 10, 2008 01:23 PM (8jYMc)
Posted by: JL at August 10, 2008 01:25 PM (ykpfY)
Look, this is a shit sandwich of epic proportions but the reality is we got beat on this one. No one is going to start WWIII over Georgia (a non NATO member). Sometimes you have to take your licks and move on to the next fight. As you can see from my post, I think that's the next question. Georgia is gone. They are going to have to get the best deal they can and hope but what's next? Do we draw a line somewhere and say, 'no further' or do we just keep getting bitch slapped by the Russians and say, 'thank you sir, may I have another'?
My fear is it will be the later.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 10, 2008 01:30 PM (hlYel)
Posted by: Cybrludite at August 10, 2008 01:33 PM (fld54)
Maybe this will wake up the fuckheads who think it's perfectly fine for Iran to have them, too.
Posted by: lmg at August 10, 2008 01:45 PM (A/vgC)
Look at a map. There is no access to Georgia. Turkey which borders the south would not let us use their territory for the Iraq invasion and probably would not for an invasion of Georgia. The Russians control the Black Sea, that is where they have their navy. If we used the Balkans countries like Romania we still have to cross the Black Sea subject to Russian interdiction.
Russia is large and maybe cumbersome but still has an enormous military. Plus they have air bases in the area. We would be at a military disadvantage, especially when we have most of our army involved in Afghanistan and Iraq. Plus Russia is one of our supply routes for Aghanistan. The other goes through the Khyber Pass that is increasing under attack by Pakistani Taliban.
We still do not have the 6 divisions that Clinton reduced with the ending of the Cold War.
It is not that we are both nuclear powers but that we do not have good acccess. Plus the oil line is for Eupope gas and oil not the US. Europe has more interest in this fight than we do.
I wish we could militarily intervene but not practible.
Posted by: RAH at August 10, 2008 01:46 PM (86SUB)
If President Bush weren't so tired we'd be fast-tracking the NATO membership of any other former soviet republic who wants to join.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 10, 2008 01:47 PM (1Ug6U)
There's also the matter the Euros. I doubt they want to pledge their comfortable lives to defend a bunch of small Eur-Asian countries, especially when Russia has them by the balls (aka oil and gas supplies).
Besides, what's a NATO pledge really mean? Look how quickly they bailed on their NATO obligations in the Balkans and Afghanistan.
Nope, I think we're looking at a couple of years (at least) of Russia expansion over parts of the former USSR.
Posted by: DrewM. at August 10, 2008 01:54 PM (hlYel)
Posted by: toby hussein 928 at August 10, 2008 01:59 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: fretless at August 10, 2008 02:01 PM (H/SkQ)
Posted by: JavaJoe at August 10, 2008 02:09 PM (Am6n/)
Posted by: George Orwell at August 10, 2008 02:11 PM (rf5CF)
Frankly it would be better to cancel the expansion of NATO. And in a perfect world disband the thing in its entirety. It does not work. At all really. All it really does is give the Euro-wienies a forum to 'play' at Military Things. But when the going gets tough (Afghansitan) the not-so-tough get going. To the extent that they won't even come out to play at night in some cases.
If Russia is concerned about NATO (and I frankly doubt they are) let's make friends and influence people by calling it a day and simply collapsing the accursed thing.
Posted by: dougf at August 10, 2008 02:27 PM (16GPT)
Posted by: Cybrludite at August 10, 2008 02:33 PM (fld54)
WAF.
Posted by: Jihadi at August 10, 2008 03:08 PM (1Ug6U)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 10, 2008 03:08 PM (1Ug6U)
'Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that Mikheil Saakashvili, the president of Georgia, "must go".' In other words, the Russians are already claiming Georgia as a client state.
On our side: '"We have no good options," a US National Security Council official told The Daily Telegraph. "We need Russia's co-operation over Iran and derailing that over a localised conflict in Georgia makes no sense. We just have to hope that diplomacy prevails. The next necessary step is for Russia to respond positively to Georgia's ceasefire declaration." '
Message from our government to our allies: "You fucked up! You trusted us!"
Posted by: David Ross at August 10, 2008 03:16 PM (wXdyD)
Posted by: David Ross at August 10, 2008 03:17 PM (wXdyD)
Posted by: David Ross at August 10, 2008 03:23 PM (wXdyD)
Why do those cocksuckers continue to draw a paycheck? When we get shitty intelligence out of the Middle East we get the excuse that the CIA is still in a Cold War mode, only to find out that those senile fucks blew this one too. Maybe they're too busy trying to throw this election to Uhhbamerr by leaking enough bullshit to confuse all the undecideds. Fire Them All.
Posted by: Captain Hate at August 10, 2008 03:47 PM (KdD+8)
@ Drew M.
"Do we draw a line somewhere and say, 'no further' or do we just keep getting bitch slapped by the Russians and say, 'thank you sir, may I have another'?"
Right now the Russian Army and Navy are crap. But they're working to improve them. Next time we decide to fight Putin it might cost a shitload more than if we'd done it now and nipped this crap in the bud.
Because you fucking well know the Chinese are watching and they have a list of countries they'd like to find out actually are a part of "historical China".
Posted by: memomachine at August 10, 2008 03:52 PM (3PLow)
That is not to say we shouldn't do something. Maybe targeted assassinations of the shit-stirrers, but I dunno.
Posted by: Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight at August 10, 2008 03:54 PM (gIga4)
Posted by: Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight at August 10, 2008 04:00 PM (gIga4)
Posted by: JavaJoe at August 10, 2008 04:20 PM (Am6n/)
Actually, I think this will help us greatly in getting the missile bases we want. In fact, the former Soviet slave states would be crazy not to get every piece of military hardware they can get their hands on.
Bush gave Putin a big "fuck you" at the Olympic games but Putin knows Obama will bend over and grab his ankles so all he has to do is wait us out... and hope McCain doesn't win. McCain reminds me a bit of slim Pickens in Dr. Strangelove (much more so than Bush does... accent or no). He would probably ride along on the bombing runs just for shits and giggles.
Do the Russians have any assets that the western countries can seize?
Posted by: asl at August 10, 2008 04:31 PM (r11nM)
Posted by: Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight at August 10, 2008 04:37 PM (gIga4)
asl,
What makes you say that? Putin has said bases for the missile shield will lead to a military response. Given what we've seen for the last 3 days, do you have any reason to doubt him? If you are the leader of the Czech Republic or Poland you have to wonder if Germany, the UK and the US will really go to war for you. Historical evidence, both recent and and not so recent, isn't comforting.
As for the value of the hardware, they won't control it, we will. Also, the European components are aimed at missiles from Iran, not Russia. It seems they will be upsetting the Russians for not a lot of direct return (I don't think Poland is worried about Iran aiming missiles at them).
Posted by: DrewM. at August 10, 2008 04:41 PM (hlYel)
we need to send in troops as peace keepers. and dare the russians to attack. It will only take a show of resolve and Putin will back down. If he doesn't we have several fleets in the persian gulf a stones throw away. We have 50,000 battle train and tested troops on the door step in Iraq. Does Russia really want a regional war with the US? I don't think so. If they do it will be a regional war not a world war yet. Of course with any military endevor it could spread I don't think a nuclear exchange is in the offerring but America needs to once again show its power and flex its muslce to protect its friends and allies.
1948 showed what happens when Russian agression is not stopped. 50 years of war.millions enslaved. trillions spent in military spending, entire populations living under M.A.D.
If America does nothing the baltic states are next, Ukraine, and eastern europe. Central Asia will be ripe for the taking with all the oil and NG. China and Russia will once again be at each other's backs.
Posted by: unseen at August 10, 2008 04:51 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: rakkim at August 10, 2008 05:42 PM (DWgCd)
We're not in there right now because we don't have a carrier battle group in that part of the world- you can't and don't project power without first having your air assets within easy reach- and also because (at least as far as the 82nd is concerned) their 2nd BCT is currently in Kuwait, according to their website.
http://www.bragg.army.mil/82dv/kuwait.html
As far as the Marine Corps is concerned- revert again to the carrier battle group remark, but also, at the moment, the 22nd and 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit are deployed to Afghanistan, and the 2nd is currently deployed to Iraq. That includes their logistics brigade, their air assets, and their command units
The simple fact of the matter is that even if we wanted to get involved, at this point, the callups would take better than a week, and you can't deploy manpower without gear to go with it. Our nearest carrier group is in the Mediterranean (the 6th Fleet if I remember correctly), and time enroute at flank speed would be at least 3-4 days. Getting gear to Georgia from stateside would be about a week at best, assuming that they could load armor and vehicles directly. There is still the issue of repainting them for northern Europe operations.
Not trying to be snarky, JL, just throwing facts out there... our forces are currently geared for Western Asia operations. That means desert. Georgia isn't desert.
I suppose that we might be able to rustle up some close air support aircraft, but none of our foreign forward bases will allow us to conduct even defensive combat operations, and the Georgian airfields are under too much direct fire to be usable.
tmi3rd
tmi3rd
Posted by: tmi3rd at August 10, 2008 05:43 PM (Gz0u5)
Posted by: bobdole's pills at August 10, 2008 05:55 PM (iot9F)
Or with the Turks permission, we could fly out of Turkey... doubtful.
The Marines would go in quickly if Bush gives the order. (every Marine is a rifleman.)
We also have the 101st Airborne.
Tis, too bad the French and Germans opposed NATO membership for Georgia.
Posted by: Marvin at August 10, 2008 06:05 PM (r+Adl)
Posted by: Stinky Esposito at August 10, 2008 06:12 PM (MMC8r)
And just to concur with Drew and RAH... NATO is a non-entity without direct US muscle to back it up. I don't have time to post the links to the OrBat of the other nations in NATO, but suffice it to say that they don't have the combat effectives necessary to handle the gig if we can't get there quickly.
Add to that the fact that it really comes down to these nations' willingness to commit to armed conflict (which, as we've seen, is relatively nonexistent), and Russia currently has carte blanche to more or less reconquer their previous holdings.
In the meantime- Drew, I'll be in your neck of the woods in December- looking forward to hopefully making your acquaintance then.
tmi3rd
Posted by: tmi3rd at August 10, 2008 06:13 PM (Gz0u5)
By the way- I found a page at globalsecurity.org that shows deployment status for US troops... it doesn't paint a pretty picture for the ability to muster more troops. Like Marvin said, there's not a Marine out there who isn't a rifleman first, but we'd need to muster them first.
I didn't spend a whole lot of time looking over the site, but I covered the 101st for 2 years while living in Nashville, and they were deployed to the Middle East a whole lot in that period. If memory serves, they're still over there.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/boots.htm
tmi3rd
Posted by: tmi3rd at August 10, 2008 06:18 PM (Gz0u5)
Posted by: JL at August 10, 2008 06:51 PM (Y7tIh)
Posted by: JL at August 10, 2008 07:02 PM (Y7tIh)
...or would you have to kill me?
Posted by: Fritz at August 10, 2008 07:41 PM (zAvxs)
The reason the 82nd Airborne isn't on the way to defend our ally, Georgia, is because Presidente Arbusto looked deep into Putin's eyes and peered deep deep deep into his soul and pronounced him a good man. Like Ted Kennedy.
No, you fucking dolts, one reason why the 82nd isn't on its way to Georgia is that its just coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan.
82nd Airborne returning from Iraq
You people really are morons, aren't you? Wow. And you have no idea how stretched the ground forces are, right? How Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld's fuck ups have destroyed American power?
There are several other reasons why the 82nd Airborne isn't going to Georgia, including the ones the Germans learned in 1941-44.
Posted by: icus at August 10, 2008 08:37 PM (I3lj0)
You mean the Russians (and the Chinese) changed from communism to fascism, and resultingly got sneakier and more efficient. Mussolini's key conceit/insight was that coopting and regulating wealth into the service of the state works better in practice than trying to steal or destroy it.
Posted by: Dave J at August 10, 2008 09:06 PM (B192h)
If we help Georgia, Poland and others will be much more inclined to help us. If we don't, the world will know that we are no longer a nation that is relevant to their national security.
Not to mention that this is WRONG. Russia is lying to the world about this. It's stopped being democratic, has no free speech, and is enslaving other nations. It's always easier to fight this evil early. They are building up for a reason, and it's so they can hold their own if China or the US fight them. Right now, they cannot. We need to go crazy scaling out our missile shield, or at least tell the world we have, and go ahead and send in as many QRF as we can into Georgia.
this is a turning point for the next 25 years, and Bush has been chewed up so many times that I doubt he can face evil as well as he has. We haven't supported him and given him slack, and no one else has either, and this is the price. Bush's lack of support was likely a key consideration that is killing the people of Georgia (not that Bush isn't to blame by being so unable to communicate what the hell he's up to).
Posted by: ghy at August 10, 2008 09:08 PM (8jYMc)
If we help Georgia, Poland and others will be much more inclined to help us. If we don't, the world will know that we are no longer a nation that is relevant to their national security.
Not to mention that this is WRONG. Russia is lying to the world about this. It's stopped being democratic, has no free speech, and is enslaving other nations. It's always easier to fight this evil early. They are building up for a reason, and it's so they can hold their own if China or the US fight them. Right now, they cannot. We need to go crazy scaling out our missile shield, or at least tell the world we have, and go ahead and send in as many QRF as we can into Georgia.
this is a turning point for the next 25 years, and Bush has been chewed up so many times that I doubt he can face evil as well as he has. We haven't supported him and given him slack, and no one else has either, and this is the price. Bush's lack of support was likely a key consideration that is killing the people of Georgia (not that Bush isn't to blame by being so unable to communicate what the hell he's up to).
Posted by: ghy at August 10, 2008 09:08 PM (8jYMc)
Wow, icus, my post saying where the 82nd was has been up for over 3 hours now, but I'm so glad you could ride to our rescue with your Obama-approved bicycle helmet and pink cape. Thanks so much.
tmi3rd
Posted by: tmi3rd at August 10, 2008 09:37 PM (Gz0u5)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at August 11, 2008 06:06 AM (1hM1d)
If you want to even up the score think Venezuela.
BTW, Russian web also reports that they captured a "Georgian" Su-25 pilot shot down ove Tskhinvali who speaks neither Georgian nor Russian, but only English. He could be American advisor, or perhaps an Israeli, South African, or British merc. Sites also reprot recovering other bodies of dead african-American troops.
Posted by: Rurik at August 11, 2008 06:26 AM (Yk88X)
First of all, nice to find a place where I don't find posts like "Russia is doing great" , "Georgia is an US puppet and deserved it".
Anyway, it is sad to see how the US is acting in this fuckup... I mean, a lot of countries are persuaded (or forced) into helping the US in various aspects - Georgia sent troops to Iraq- and then get invaded and the american government just says "it's a very troubling situation". wow. This will surely drive the T-72s out of any country. And then people ask why America is hated, why no one trusts in the american government....well, this is one of the reasons.
I live in Brazil, and here (and in most of South America) it is common to hate the US. (I think it's that old strategy: we fuck ourselves, and find someone else to blame. Of course, we blame it on the country who's richer than us.). This is just another example: If Colombia (The biggest, and maybe only US ally in the region) get invaded by Venezuela, is the US really willing to help? This kind of behavior just grow the hate against the US....
Posted by: TomBR at August 11, 2008 06:52 AM (ye6ly)
Posted by: J David at August 11, 2008 08:07 AM (FjiTU)
Posted by: JL at August 11, 2008 10:51 AM (ykpfY)
Posted by: JL at August 11, 2008 11:15 AM (ykpfY)
Posted by: Carol at August 12, 2008 09:21 PM (Bfdnq)
注册香港公司
Posted by: Carol at August 12, 2008 09:23 PM (Bfdnq)
Posted by: fdsfsd at October 08, 2009 09:21 PM (eqMrT)
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.









