November 29, 2008
— Purple Avenger Cowbell anyone?
The USGS estimates that there are 85.4 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas from natural gas hydrates on the Alaskan North Slope. This is the first-ever resource estimate of technically recoverable natural gas hydrates in the world...More details here.
Current gas reserves in North America are estimated to be in the 280T cubic feet range. Adding another 85T to that is a pretty big jump indeed.
Posted by: Truth Meter at November 29, 2008 07:21 PM (plYMr)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 07:22 PM (MOdlB)
Posted by: pendejo grande at November 29, 2008 07:22 PM (iMnDJ)
I'm sure that the President-Elect Lightworker Chicago Jesus will find an endangered snail or fly up there that we must save, and tapping all that natural gas just won't do.
The Green Economy. Put your shoulders into it, you peons.
Posted by: Jones at November 29, 2008 07:26 PM (VkNlv)
Posted by: someone at November 29, 2008 07:33 PM (1wXl7)
Posted by: ATNorth at November 29, 2008 07:35 PM (dBJw1)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 07:42 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Moonbat_One at November 29, 2008 07:47 PM (RFDNy)
Posted by: Kaptain Amerika at November 29, 2008 07:48 PM (6vrhg)
Posted by: 29Victor at November 29, 2008 07:50 PM (kJVzu)
As an Official Member of the Energy Department's First Allocation Program's Response to those who are part of the Public Works Programs, Ohio Public Utilities Commission as part of the Division of Public Assets. If you followed that, you're smarter than I am.
Posted by: ErikW at November 29, 2008 07:50 PM (6x3r4)
Posted by: pendejo grande at November 29, 2008 07:51 PM (iMnDJ)
*Yeah, yeah... ignoring thermodynamics of closed systems blahbity blah blah blah. Work with me here.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 29, 2008 07:53 PM (sI5Ho)
The stuff off Fla are methane hydrates as I recall. That, and being underwater makes it a whole different level of difficulty.
Posted by: krakatoa at November 29, 2008 07:56 PM (YM1XM)
That's allot of natural gas.
Nope not gonna touch it.
Posted by: democrats at November 29, 2008 07:58 PM (O55b1)
Posted by: ErikW at November 29, 2008 08:00 PM (6x3r4)
The gas from Alaska's natural gas hydrates would be enough to heat more than 100 million average homes for 10 years.
US consumes 23TCF per year right now.
Posted by: lorien1973 at November 29, 2008 08:06 PM (ddGv/)
Posted by: D Cheney at November 29, 2008 08:08 PM (YM1XM)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:09 PM (ul7te)
My plan for making money since this is the set of idiots that will control the govt purse strings is to get into carbon sequestration. I will collect paper before it is recycled . Since the carbon from the atmosphere has been sequestered in the paper. I'll have to give my plan a stupid name to sell it but I will fool them with the big words since they have no clue as to how this shit works.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 08:10 PM (MOdlB)
thanks krak, I just didn't know the technicalities, I knew there was a reason other than green thought, but I didn't know.
I think they have to be drilled, and sampled, and then mixed with water, and then seperated with water or some shit like that.
The gulf hydrates are MAJOR! and need to be perfected before gulf exploitation, but we knew they have existed for more than 20 years.
We can't pay dubai to maintain our ports, but we will give too much of our national product for their gas, when we have the largest coal and natural gas reservoirs within our own borders.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:13 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 29, 2008 08:14 PM (sI5Ho)
Posted by: spamhead at November 29, 2008 08:15 PM (u4f7N)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:16 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:17 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: krakatoa at November 29, 2008 08:18 PM (YM1XM)
I don't know Anon, not that kinda fixer, but it's my understanding that gaseous hydrates are volatile while in the presence of water, so, you drill, and seal, and exchange solids and at sea level pressure, you add water, then seperate the methane and pump out the pure water.
But that is just based on one docu I saw on TV.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:20 PM (ul7te)
You picked the right guys to name your trees, since they all had more wood than their wives could control.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 08:24 PM (MOdlB)
Yeah, I know about GW, I'm just waiting for sunspot data. Oh, nevermind that the poles are freezing over like no ones biz! Must be the warming temps that cause freezing. Ha!
Posted by: ErikW at November 29, 2008 08:31 PM (6x3r4)
If you are looking for a comparison, that is the volume equivalent to a cube measuring 10,000 feet (just a smidge over 3 km) on an edge (or a largish mountain, say about 20,000 feet tall, because of the narrowing at the top). Your average home contains about 8-10,000 cubic feet.
It is the energy equivalent of 1.1 billion MWh (just over 1 quadrillion BTU).
Just to compare, check your own energy bills for the equivalent units being used, and see how many millions of households that much energy could provide for.
Posted by: Drumwaster at November 29, 2008 08:33 PM (Ymor3)
Posted by: Arthur at November 29, 2008 08:37 PM (4MHbz)
to be fair, thats TCF at 1 atmosphere, not in it's compressed state.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:37 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at November 29, 2008 08:42 PM (sI5Ho)
Posted by: FloofyParisParamus at November 29, 2008 08:50 PM (rbLHc)
(That's generally the appropriate response these days.)
Posted by: LC at November 29, 2008 08:51 PM (K37tB)
Ours may end up at $3.00 or even $4.00 a gallon to make it profitable but that is better than the ME MFs having control.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 08:51 PM (MOdlB)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:52 PM (ul7te)
THATS THE BITCH OF IT!!!
The government doesn't need to subsidize exploitation, they just need to get the fuck out of the way!!!!
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 08:53 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: AGR at November 29, 2008 09:03 PM (r8a5Z)
Posted by: Sergei at November 29, 2008 09:03 PM (4f9V7)
Anyone that doesn't want that should have to get a special permit to buy gas. These buttheads make me get a permit to buy guns they should need a permit to buy gas.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 09:11 PM (MOdlB)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:14 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 09:17 PM (MOdlB)
Posted by: Mr. Pissed at November 29, 2008 09:18 PM (X7Ey1)
No cowbell. Hydrates are tricky (they're actually the reason that we need pigs in our gas lines) and incredibly unfriendly as natural gas products go. As far as I know (and it's my field of interest), there is no good way to free hydrates of their water. There are only 'ok' ways, all of which are much more complicated and magnitudes less efficient than simply sucking the non-hydrate gas out of the ground and removing the sulphur.
Don't get your hopes up on this one. It's about as useful as coal mined in Texas (you know, the stuff that has about 10% of the energy in it that anthracite coal has). There's some energy in both, but not too much.
Posted by: Kevin at November 29, 2008 09:20 PM (KO6dP)
I thought this was the reason that Sarah had signed the contract with that Canadian company to build a pipeline to the Midwest. This area IS recoverable and they plan on recovering it.
Posted by: Vic at November 29, 2008 09:21 PM (Qd7GC)
If the moonbats in DC block drilling that, I think Alaska's going to start thinking breakaway. They'd be richer than the Saudis until Vladmir Putin decides to reposess what the Czars sold...
Posted by: SGT Dan at November 29, 2008 09:22 PM (Q6BTe)
The "captives" are the commenters at the hostages. You are only a hostage if you have access, everyone else is a detainee or a captive.
and "The Hostages" is my sorta kinda blog, even though I don't post often.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:25 PM (ul7te)
different field Vic.
Hydrates are different, not because of the energy added, but because of an uncontrollable reaction in exploitation.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:27 PM (ul7te)
to quote mila jovavich, vic, and mila is one of my and my brothers favorite all time hotties, "BADA BOOM! BIG BADA BOOM!"
I'm not an engineer, but I think "BADA BOOM" at an energery exploitation site is not a good thing.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:28 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 09:37 PM (MOdlB)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:38 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Vic at November 29, 2008 09:49 PM (Qd7GC)
The admins got a a dead thread going at the moment so they aren't doing jackassery with any competence.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 09:52 PM (MOdlB)
It's just that I can't access buzz.
It's kinda irritating.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:57 PM (ul7te)
and by "jackassery" I was wondering if one of them decided to play games by blocking my IP. We kinda do that, if you didn't notice in the comments. Basicaly the hostages is where you go to insult and be insulted.
Me, Mesa, PA,ND PJ Wiser and others to twist the game a touch
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 09:59 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 29, 2008 10:09 PM (MOdlB)
Democrats: "Sorry, the mosquito population of the north slope must be protected."
Posted by: SamIam at November 29, 2008 10:23 PM (jl7C/)
Yeah, you rate detainee or captive status.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 10:38 PM (ul7te)
Posted by: XBradTC at November 29, 2008 11:11 PM (GIPhT)
Posted by: Wickedpinto at November 29, 2008 11:20 PM (ul7te)
I'm sick and tired
Of your liberal views
What's politically correct
Come Judgment Day
I'll be tying a noose
And slippingg it 'round your neck.
Can I stand up an' say
There's some people 'round 'ere
Need blowing away
But for you,
There's just no 'ope
Get a rope,
Get a rope!
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 30, 2008 12:28 AM (RWmCt)
Is that more than 1.21 gigawatts?
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at November 30, 2008 12:38 AM (Vcyz0)
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 30, 2008 12:41 AM (RWmCt)
Posted by: Barack Obama at November 30, 2008 02:00 AM (G3Wx0)
Posted by: lowandslow at November 30, 2008 02:08 AM (thEW6)
Posted by: Velociman at November 30, 2008 03:11 AM (XrP/E)
Posted by: eaglewingz08 at November 30, 2008 03:25 AM (tjEJG)
It is not clear that Point Thompson is the same area, and Palin is not the problem with the development of it. Exxon-Mobile has been sitting on it since 1960 WITHOUT DEVELOPING IT which is costing the State money in lost revenues.
Posted by: Vic at November 30, 2008 03:27 AM (Qd7GC)
Blaming Palin, or anyone else for their lack of use is silly. We just don't have the technology to efficiently put them to use.
On the ephemeral side though, the stuff looks pretty cool. It looks like ice, is room temp to the touch, and you can burn it for a few seconds. Neat! As an energy source, not so much.
Posted by: Kevin at November 30, 2008 04:04 AM (KO6dP)
What are you talking about? Of course Point Thompson is in the North Slope
"and Palin is not the problem with the development of it. Exxon-Mobile has been sitting on it since 1960 WITHOUT DEVELOPING IT which is costing the State money in lost revenues."
Boy that sounds familiar, who spouts this same rhetoric? Could it be Pelosi and her ilk? There's more to extracting the natural gas then meets the eye when it comes to the economics of it. Like it or not right now it's the Palin administration that's stopping Exxon from developing Point Thompson by rejecting their plans to develop it, by litigating the lease and by denying their request to build an ice road to begin developing it. And it didn't cost the state anything, the natural gas didn't go anywhere.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 30, 2008 04:05 AM (thEW6)
I guess I pulled it a little off topic from the Gas Hydrates.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 30, 2008 04:46 AM (thEW6)
71 People, these are natural gas HYDRATES that they are talking about, not natural gas.
OK Kevin, than what does all this mean in terms of usable energy?
Posted by: 7HEAVENS at November 30, 2008 05:00 AM (oIvn7)
Don't get your hopes up on this one. It's about as useful as coal mined in Texas (you know, the stuff that has about 10% of the energy in it that anthracite coal has). There's some energy in both, but not too much.
So we should discount this as PR CYA for the USGS to keep their jobs? Bummer. After 25 years of study they finally announce nothing at all?
On another note, I read yesterday that the great majority of our biofuel, (which was supposed to replace gasoline and has driven up the price of food around the world) has been exported to countries that pay more than we do. And we subsidized it all lavishly. Can we get a Cowbell?
Posted by: 7HEAVENS at November 30, 2008 05:22 AM (oIvn7)
Methancaus Taurocanicus Cacaris was proposed name given of this new species, and the unusual nature of its existance.
Robert Dingleberry, spokesman for WWF, has called for further investigation, research, and the possible protection of this new find.
"We can't let our wanton needs threaten this new find," Dingleberry stated. "We're going to have to look at our usage of natural gas, and find a new source to use as fuel to warm our homes, heat our water, generate steam for electricity, and other uses. We've now found out our comfort threatens others, and, has been since the use of its habitat."
Dingleberry also called on the Alaskan governor, the state lesislature, and the Federal government to curtail further development, utilization, and production of natural gas, until the impact on the new species.
+++ +++ +++ +++
..... you just wait - its coming....
Posted by: fred zeppelin at November 30, 2008 05:33 AM (R4ffQ)
Boy that sounds familiar, who spouts this same rhetoric?
Yes, you sound just like a Moby. This shit started in 2005 long before Palin and they have had 40 fucking years to do something and have not.
At some point even the most patient have tothrow the bullshit flag. And no Nanny Nancy would be stopping ALL development. Palin want SOMEBODY to develope it and wants to reissue the lease.
And yes we know it is on the North slope but it is not the strata that this article is talking about.
Posted by: Vic at November 30, 2008 05:46 AM (Qd7GC)
And you sound like a Palin apologist that will defend her without regards to any facts. Who cares what happened in the past forty years, right now it's the Palin Administration that's stopping Exxon from developing Point Thompson, no one else.
Posted by: lowandslow at November 30, 2008 06:00 AM (thEW6)
Posted by: Earth First!1! at November 30, 2008 06:26 AM (VFkb6)
Watch: Putin is eventually going to restore the Russian monarchy under some powerless Romanov puppet in order to completely eliminate the presidency as another power base and increase his unaccountability as PM. Then he probably WILL lay claim to Alaska, as well as everything that the Tsars ever ruled, i.e., Ukraine, Georgia, the Caucasus, the Balts, Finland, Poland.
Posted by: Dave J at November 30, 2008 06:33 AM (qsGH+)
WP @ 50:
There was a German language magazine about 10 years ago that had a several page layout of Mila. Her breasts were the best I've seen. The magazine was called MAX, I think. Wished I'd kept my copy, b/c she's not as attractive anymore.
Posted by: Pigilito at November 30, 2008 07:15 AM (GR6JB)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 30, 2008 07:36 AM (VLxln)
Posted by: locus ceruleus at November 30, 2008 07:39 AM (e2mBS)
Posted by: Whiny Leftists at November 30, 2008 07:45 AM (9Vu+H)
Speaking of nutcases and chemicals Jeff, my lesbian girlfriend forgot and took her methadone and anti-deppressants twice yesterday. She perked up walking the dog, but nodded out later over the Valu-Rite. She can be such a bore sometimes! She's a dog behaviorist like Cesar Milan and teaches Submission.
Posted by: 7HEAVENS at November 30, 2008 07:48 AM (oIvn7)
Posted by: mossback at November 30, 2008 08:45 AM (in8Vs)
And all that made me think of is that this is some sort of T-Boone propaganda.
We've been T-Booned!
Posted by: Nyctalus Lasiopterus at November 30, 2008 08:57 AM (EPSru)
Posted by: Big Swede at November 30, 2008 09:15 AM (GhwKr)
Posted by: Ed at November 30, 2008 10:02 AM (VFkb6)
It's like...about 500 cubic MILES of gas.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 30, 2008 10:49 AM (CwzFE)
Come again? A cube just under 2 miles on a side somehow equals 500 cubic miles? 2 x 2 x 2 = 8, not 500. Even in metric terms, it's less than 30 cubic kilometers.
Posted by: Drumwaster at November 30, 2008 11:10 AM (Ymor3)
Posted by: exception at November 30, 2008 11:26 AM (o5wq5)
84,000,000,000,000 / 147,197,952,000 = 570.66.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 30, 2008 11:31 AM (CwzFE)
See comment #89. I admit that a trillion cubic feet is a shitload and a half (see # 30), even in terms of potential energy stored, but it is only what it is.
Posted by: Drumwaster at November 30, 2008 11:37 AM (Ymor3)
Wind and solar are cute, and conservation is important, but we have to produce enough to grow the economy and cut off the terrorist regimes. I hope Obama gets that--but I doubt it.
Posted by: PJ at November 30, 2008 11:59 AM (GVdvM)
BTDT. Woods Hole has already written about bacteria that metabolize gas and don't need any O2 to do it.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 30, 2008 12:02 PM (CwzFE)
Answer: Much like natural gas hydrates, gold in the ocean costs more money to recover than it's worth.
What is so complicated about that? You guys are making me embarrassed to be a conservative.
Posted by: Kevin at November 30, 2008 01:00 PM (KO6dP)
Just thought you'd like to know.
Posted by: enter sandman at November 30, 2008 01:28 PM (kRtdI)
So why is Conoco/Phillips doing a pilot hydrate extraction plant using CO2 injection up in Alaska then if this is a fools errand to even think about?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 30, 2008 02:04 PM (CwzFE)
Because that works out to less than an ounce of gold per cubic kilometer of salt water. Are you seriously trying to claim that these hydrates only yield up an ounce per cubic kilometer?
You are asserting, in essence, that these new finds are not economically recoverable at today's prices. This ignores that prices go up and down. When prices go up, more can be recovered at that higher price.
And oh, look! We've just elected a President that thinks that higher energy prices are nothing more than a "signal" to consumers...
(One last thing. That should be "... there are over a billion ...". Plural, dontchaknow?)
Posted by: Drumwaster at November 30, 2008 02:18 PM (Ymor3)
What they don't know, and probably won't for a few decades, is if hydrates can become a viable energy supply. Oil from Rocky Mountain shale is already much more proven than hydrates (MUCH MORE), and there's a few hundred billion barrels of that stuff in Colorado alone. It makes much more sense to work on extracting those until tech advances enough to allow cost effective capturing of CH4 from hydrates.
Drumwaster, I do not believe that hydrates yield an ounce of natural gas per cubic kilometer. I am amazed that you have distorted my words to suggest that I did. Let me re-iterate. Hydrates (a composition of natural gas loosely bonded to water, making it look and act like ice) are incredibly low on the list when it comes to attainable energy. I don't know how I can make this more clear. It is common knowledge. Hydrates are a pain in the ass in pipelines, and they are a pain in the ass in the ground. They totally suck. Even ethanol, if you can believe it, is a cheaper source of energy than hydrates at this point in time.
I'll shut up about it after this post, but I have to say once again that you're making conservatives look bad. We're supposed to do our homework. You're clearly not. The hydrate/ocean gold analogy was quite appropriate, and until the price of CH4 goes up to $1,000/mcf or gold goes up to $50,000/oz, it will continue to be so.
Posted by: Kevin at November 30, 2008 02:56 PM (KO6dP)
Why? Pressure and temperature. Those are variables.
If we know how to pump wet concrete, which we do, then we know how to pump a slurry of this crap to a warmer place where it won't maintain its hydrate form. It may be as simple as piping a slurry past a solar parabolic collector to warm it up.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at November 30, 2008 03:35 PM (CwzFE)
Eh. I give up. Yes, those simple properties, pressure and temperature, are the only thing stopping us from harvesting the greatest known energy source to all mankind... hydrated methane. You totally caught me.
Sadly, I'm employed by the Let's Not Allow America To Use Hydrates As Fuel Even Though It's A Great Source Of Energy conglomerate. I won't be receiving a check this week for sure. Darnit. If only you meddling kids didn't know that the secret to using methane trapped in hydrates was pressure and temperature!
This whole debate would be funny, except that the purple avenger is a hardcore conservative! That makes it kind of personal. It's your duty to understand science if you are going to be a conservative. If I could make laws, that would be one of them.
Couldn't you do some research on this subject? Saying the problem with hydrates boils down to 'temperature and pressure' is like saying 'the only trouble with room temp nuclear fusion is weak nuclear force'.
Look, I too hope that someday hydrates become a viable source of energy. But that day isn't today. You can't use current science to prove this fact away. Hopefully in a few decades you'll be able to, but until then, let's get the energy locked up in the Rockies and give this hydrate crap a rest. K?
Posted by: Kevin at November 30, 2008 04:21 PM (KO6dP)
Posted by: Kevin at November 30, 2008 04:56 PM (KO6dP)
And the problem with flight is that pesky force of gravity. Eventually when there's enough incentive to solve a problem like this, someone (not him specifically) will figure out a way to do it. Shale oil isn't going to be available right away (particularly now that Reid and Pelosi have a mandate to stop it). Windfarms, solar energy, biofuels, etc. may be technically possible at this point, but a lot of infrastructure has to be built before they matter. In other words, all of these are down-the-road ideas.
Not that it matters. The Greens and Pinkos have a common goal in ending economic activity in the US and much of the power they need to do it.
Posted by: Methos at November 30, 2008 05:08 PM (dRS5E)
But that day isn't today.
I'd like a specific quoteback of where I ever claimed it was.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 01, 2008 03:11 AM (CwzFE)
There's about ~3 cubic miles of solidish shit to be extracted if the whole of what USGS is claiming were pulled out. Most of that will become ordinary water when the shit gets warmer and the crap releases its payload.
What you see as a problem, I see as a solution. Where might there be people in a warm climate, that will warm the crap up for free, who could use a nice fresh water+energy package? Southern California leaps to mind.
This is a logistics/transport problem, not a chemical problem.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 01, 2008 03:30 AM (CwzFE)
We need the strong nuclear forces to control the anti-Palin Mobies. I suggest a liberal application of the delta-m theory of binding energy to the areas frequented by the Mobies.
Posted by: Vic at December 01, 2008 04:53 AM (Qd7GC)
Posted by: RJ at December 01, 2008 06:30 PM (7nbTg)
Posted by: obama at December 17, 2008 04:10 PM (vV3tk)
Posted by: dadada at December 22, 2008 07:51 PM (6sWo1)
If you come, we will give you a great surprise!
Posted by: pw Gold at January 02, 2009 03:17 PM (fMiY/)
Anti Wrinkle Cream Anti Wrinkle Cream
Iklan Baris Iklan Baris
Posted by: Nowgoogle.com adalah multiple search engine Popular at March 07, 2010 08:44 PM (eW1d9)
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 07, 2011 09:25 PM (JsxNx)
Posted by: DTS Converter at November 04, 2011 01:45 AM (x5HsY)
62 queries taking 2.488 seconds, 350 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.