March 29, 2007

Pelosi Blocks Simple Resolution Supporting British In Iran Hostage Crisis
— Ace

The Republican Party sucks. It consists almost entirely of morons, hypocrites, sell-outs, phonies, racists, and fag-haters.

But we do have one group that sustains our political viability.

Democrats.

Posted by: Ace at 12:15 PM | Comments (48)
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I guess on the upside, they haven't offered a resolution supporting Iran.

Yet.



Posted by: Drew at March 29, 2007 12:19 PM (gNyUT)

2 Ahh, Granny Pelosi.  The inspiration for the word "cunt".

Posted by: MC Rove at March 29, 2007 12:21 PM (tcMQZ)

3 So, if you are against gay marriage and for 'don't ask don't tell,' you're a fag-hater?

Posted by: Red at March 29, 2007 12:22 PM (pPek3)

4 Was that a binding resolution of support or a non-binding resolution of support?  'Cause I bet good ol' Nan would be all for it if it were non-binding.

Posted by: wiserbud at March 29, 2007 12:24 PM (WOPFA)

5 eerrr....Thanks Nancy!!

Posted by: Grateful Brit at March 29, 2007 12:29 PM (+aNmG)

6 Hey!!! Thanks Nancy!!!

Posted by: Grateful Mullah at March 29, 2007 12:42 PM (+aNmG)

7 You forgot to mention christian kooks. Remember, you need them more than they need you.

This is Tonkin Gulf bullshit all over again.

The boundary of <a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6496559.stm>Shatt is disputed anyhow.</a> The British can make up any boundary they want.

Posted by: Admiral George Stephen Morrison at March 29, 2007 01:05 PM (yDgFH)

8 *spit*

Posted by: franksalterego at March 29, 2007 01:06 PM (qQ55q)

9 *swallow*

Posted by: Andi Sullivan at March 29, 2007 01:08 PM (WOPFA)

10 "So, if you are against gay marriage and for 'don't ask don't tell,' you're a fag-hater?"

There are a lot of Republicans who go far farther than that. Those two issues are just the only ones that they are comfortable being vocal about.

But as for the "one group that sustains our political viability."... that is what did it for me. Years ago I thought the Pat Buchanan type socialist Republicans theocrats would mean I would never again root for the Republicans. Between Clinton's clipper chip terms and everything since 9-11, the Democrats have proven to me that they have backed their party bus up to the goblin ranch and filled up with new members. There is no barrier between the hyper insane left and the Democratic party.

Posted by: Saul at March 29, 2007 01:12 PM (hgX7d)

11

So the party that came up with "Lend-Lease" can't be bothered to issue a statement of support?


Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 29, 2007 01:16 PM (e72PW)

12

The corollary between Liberals and Paleosimians gets closer every day, doesn't it.

I mean, after all, what's left to be said about people who burn their own soldiers in effegy, and sh!t on their own flag?


I guess, these DemonicRat Assholes (w/a capital "A") won't be happy until we're knee-deep in our OWN cesspool.


Posted by: franksalterego at March 29, 2007 01:19 PM (qQ55q)

13 They depths these libs will crawl to are uncharted.

Posted by: Iblis at March 29, 2007 01:30 PM (9221z)

14

Cesspools suck! take my word for it.


Posted by: shit covered palistinian at March 29, 2007 01:31 PM (+aNmG)

15 This is insane. Purely insane.

Posted by: Jim Rockford at March 29, 2007 01:36 PM (4878o)

16

They're too busy not supporting our military.


Posted by: Muskwa at March 29, 2007 01:40 PM (i3QB9)

17 I wrote my Congresscritters.  They're both from the party of morons, hypocrites, sell-outs, etc., so I thought they could use a little friendly reminder that this is exactly the sort of thing they should be bashing the Dems about.

Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at March 29, 2007 01:44 PM (w4Bx4)

18

So, if you are against gay marriage and for 'don't ask don't tell,' you're a fag-hater?


According the the establishment left?  Yes, of course- haven't you been paying attention? 


Also, if you're against amnesty for illegals and for better border enforcement, you're a filthy racist.  Oppose abortion-on-demand or federal abortion funding?  Sexist.  Think it's OK for our currency to have "In God We Trust" printed on it, or opposed to removing a plaque with the Ten Commandments on it from a government building?  You're an intolerant Christianist theocracy supporter.


Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 29, 2007 01:48 PM (plsiE)

19 <i>They depths these libs will crawl to are uncharted.</i>



Is it really surprising that liberals will seize an opportunity to make
America look bad?  We are a unilateral rogue state after all.

Posted by: Justin at March 29, 2007 01:50 PM (Q4HdS)

20

So, if you are against gay marriage and for 'don't ask don't tell,' you're a fag-hater?

Red, meet irony. Irony: Red. Please make yourselves comfortable and chat while I greet the other guests.


Posted by: jhc at March 29, 2007 01:54 PM (IL3Gd)

21

RE: #8:


GPS calcs clearly put the British on the Iraqi side of the strait, as the Iranians own friggin data verified (before they falsified it several DAYS later while talking to the Foreign Office). 


There is also the fact that Iran has a long history of supporting terrorism, is violating the Geneva Convention by displaying their hostages and forcing the woman to wear Muslim clothing, has an active nuclear weapons program and is  currently engaging in acts of war agains the US (and now, England as well).


Yet the Democrats can't even be bothered to show symbolic support for our oldest ally.  That should tell you something.


Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at March 29, 2007 01:55 PM (4ne0/)

22 Well look, how bad did the GOP have to get, for how long, with how much overwhelmingly one-sided propaganda by the legacy media against them before people finally got tired of them? All that happened is people forgot that horrible greasy, nasty filthy feeling that we had after 8 years of sleaze from President Clinton and Democrats in congress. These two years will be more than adequate a reminder.


It didn't need to be. The Democrats could have thumbed their nose at the radical freaks, balanced the budget, cleaned up corruption, and been sane, cautious, and careful in their legislation. Throwing the dinosaurs like Pelosi, Reid, and Schumer out of power would be the first step. Castigating members like William Jeffersonon would have been another.


I even hoped they would: but they didn't. They wallowed right in the mire just like we knew they would. They just can't help themselves.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 29, 2007 01:57 PM (wmgz8)

23 Ace, you are one funny motherf*cker.

Posted by: Hot Air at March 29, 2007 02:02 PM (zIOCj)

24

Gotta love that NEW CONGRESS feeling!


Aww, whats the matter, another soggy TV dinner got you down? Don't worry kids,extra tasty NEW CONGRESS to the recue! So packed full of nuts and roots, every bite bursts with the tangy flavor of apeasment and cowardice!


Now packed with the meaty goodness of 24 BILLION DOLLARS of pork!! 


Posted by: Max Power at March 29, 2007 02:03 PM (q177U)

25 Thanks, Nancy. You bitch.

Posted by: mikeyslaw at March 29, 2007 02:19 PM (yrptY)

26

Castigating members like William Jeffersonon would have been another.


Thought you said "castrating members" and I was like all, "Hell, yeah! Join the club mofo."


Otherwise, thanks Nancy, you syphiltic bitch.


Posted by: Neutered at March 29, 2007 02:28 PM (Xj2Ev)

27 Well, either way, really.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 29, 2007 04:34 PM (wmgz8)

28

Am I the only one who feels like screaming? Granted I've not been a Brit since '94 but... AAAAUGH!


THEY FORCED OUR SAILOR TO WEAR A HIJAB for Chrissakes!! And then an Arafat Kaffiyeh!


This is a symbolic violation of our women; British, American, Lichtensteinian - whatever. This was a symbolic rape! And all Blair can do is to mumble about "misunderstandings" and threaten a UN resolution. No.


FUCK YOU, Tony Blair. What you need to do, is to say "you're going to give that girl back and apologise or else you're going to lose your refineries and the whole fucking Strait of Hormuz. By the time me & Dubya are through with you, you're going to be wearing that Kaffiyeh as a shroud."


Every day that we're screwing around with the UN is another day that Ahmadinejad and his buddies get to jerk off to scarf-sullied snuff porn. No, no, and NO! I've had enough of this bullshit.


Posted by: David Ross at March 29, 2007 04:50 PM (RPT01)

29

Just what is Bush waiting for, another smoldering crater?


 


Fuck Iran up the ass with a flaming piano!


Posted by: eman at March 29, 2007 05:46 PM (FWrFx)

30 will the last one out of the country grab the flag on the way out?
oh.
right.
well, i guess, just leave it here then. um. uh. ich kann ein bischen deutsche sprechen, naja?


Posted by: jdubious at March 29, 2007 05:49 PM (AN0Fo)

31 and while the rest of you are out Hageling yourselves... uh... ok... i got nuthin'.
but really, Hageling oneself is kinda funny right? right?


Posted by: jdubious at March 29, 2007 05:50 PM (AN0Fo)

32 David,

chill pal. The Iranians badly want the British to do as you are wanting them to do. They are running out of money, they are running out of time with their own people. Things are actually occuring in the region as we gain breakthroughs in intelligence and Iraq is being won decisively. Iran is compeletly surrounded with the nations the US has allied with or invaded int he past six years.

Bush has always been focused on Iran. The Iraq strategy was based on this present scenario, where Iran sees its future destabilization and begins acting desperately. They need galvanization and respect in the world, and the only way for them to get that is if they are invaded.

Iran did this thing, the hostage taking. We need to be aware of what they expected to do (this was a well planned attack obviously conceived at the highest levels for some time by Iran to coincide with Ahmedinijad's speech he didn't give). Let's not give Iran what it wants, let's keep the price of oil down by leveraging Iraq and Saudi Arabia as we have. Iran's economy is reeling at their inability to inflate oil price.

Nuclear Weapons research is freaking expensive, and we are going to let Iran to what the USSR did, waste their limited money penuriously building ridiculous weapons that we will just sabatoge or destroy.

Posted by: PJ at March 29, 2007 06:06 PM (vrIec)

33 I swear that prior post was broken into paragraphs dammit.

Posted by: PJ at March 29, 2007 06:06 PM (vrIec)

34 The New Comments Thingy ignores paragraphs, you have to use

between lines to make it breakthings up, at least that's what I do. But with ><

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 29, 2007 07:28 PM (wmgz8)

35

PJ, yeah... looking back on that post, I'd say I've just had my first AoS meltdown. What an embarrassment.


I apologise to all loyal Ace of Spades readers . I should take time off of watching current events, which I can't do anything about anyway, and instead Google up photos of Knut the lovable baby bear. Sigh.


Posted by: David Ross at March 29, 2007 07:29 PM (RPT01)

36 Don't apologize Ross! Dammit there have been too many Brits (and Americans) not batting an eye over the hostage outrage. It's GOOD to get angry over kidnap.

Plus forcing someone to wear a hijab just pisses me off.

Posted by: CapitalistPiglet at March 29, 2007 09:06 PM (/MRpt)

37

Britain is done.


We'll get there, in 20-30 years. I'll be dead, and thus won't give a fuck. But at least I got to see some cool stuff- the moon landings, the fall of the Iron Curtain, and Sonny Jurgensen running the 2 Minute Drill at RFK Stadium against Roman Gabriel and the Eagles.


I got to see America at the height of her powers. You kids get to watch it all go to Hell.


Posted by: barry in co at March 29, 2007 11:54 PM (KOkrW)

38 Damn, Barry.  Here I was thinking you were okay and now I learn you're a Redskins fan and another illusion is shattered.

Posted by: cranky at March 30, 2007 02:27 AM (Xj2Ev)

39

Whoa whoa whoa! I have NEVER been a moron, sell-out, hypocrite or a sell out. Now, i've never been a racist or a "fag-hater" but so help me if your out there instigating the stereotype then you DO NOT meet the non-discriminatory license agreement.


Posted by: Nth at March 30, 2007 03:19 AM (fdeNn)

40 Now we know what to expect if the Donks win the White House in '08. We'll have no allies, no foreign policy, no abiity to enforce our national will further than Okinawa. (You know, where Murtha the Marine thinks Our Boys & Girls should be to enforce peace in the Middle East.) Run, whine, and grovel, will be the orders of the day.

Remember people, anybody BUT a Democrat in '08. The future security of our nation depends on it.


Posted by: exdem13 at March 30, 2007 05:18 AM (zr8rE)

41 Oppossing gay marriage is not necessarily hateful toward gays.  However, if you oppose gay marriage, then the only reason you have to do that is because you think gay sex is disgusting and, by virtue of that, you oppose anything which would improve the lives of those people.  Put short: you don't necessarily want gay people's lives to get worse, but you certianly don't want them getting any better.  Whether or not this constitutes "hate" is a matter of rhetoric.

(Then there are people who really do want gay people's lives to get worse, but no one here wants that.)

For the record: I'm a gay guy who does not support gay marriage.  I support the elimination of special rights of which marriage rights are a subset.  Naturally this falls into the "No way in hell" category, but it is what it is.

Posted by: Loundry at March 30, 2007 06:25 AM (CyFUh)

42

Oppossing gay marriage is not necessarily hateful toward gays.  However, if you oppose gay marriage, then the only reason you have to do that is because you think gay sex is disgusting and, by virtue of that, you oppose anything which would improve the lives of those people.


    I think gay sex is disgusting and I'm against gay marraige. I am, however a heterosexual male who finds myself attracted to many different woman, yet I oppose polygamy.  Maybe I oppose gay marraige for the same reason I oppose polygamy: Neither fits the western definition of marraige which serves society well. Either would erode the definition of marraige and thus the institution itself.


 Put short: you don't necessarily want gay people's lives to get worse, but you certianly don't want them getting any better.  Whether or not this constitutes "hate" is a matter of rhetoric.
    You have serious delusions if you beleive that the average person sits around thinking about the genaral state of gays. I tend not to think of gays at all until you start screaming about your nest cause du joir. I think of the gay people I know as individuals not a group and they do not stuff their gayness in my face at evey oppurtunity.


Posted by: captkidney at March 30, 2007 07:39 AM (uQDzC)

43 Neither fits the western definition of marraige which serves society well.

Argument by assertion.  "It's right because it's right."

Either would erode the definition of marraige and thus the institution itself.

"Institution" being defined as "something that fucks up at least half the time".

You have serious delusions if you beleive that the average person sits around thinking about the genaral state of gays.

Of course they don't.  They have better things to do.  But when two guys want to marry each other, then they start thinking about it.  Such a thing would make their lives better, and you clearly don't want that.



Posted by: Loundry at March 30, 2007 07:57 AM (CyFUh)

44 Laundry,

I couldn't care less if homosexuals get married, I really don't care.
But gay sex is absolutely disgusting. Unless it is between two good looking women who also are only dabbling in it just to please a man, or because they are kinky, then it is super good, not disgusting at all.

I can only imagine how disgusting Rosie gay sex would be.

Who knows what any of us would do in a pinch.


Posted by: Uniball at March 30, 2007 08:35 AM (27iEn)

45 Actually I am sure I look pretty disgusting some of the time.

My face probably looks pretty funny too.

Posted by: Uniball at March 30, 2007 08:37 AM (27iEn)

46

Neither fits the western definition of marraige which serves society well.

Argument by assertion.  "It's right because it's right."


Greatest predictor of poverty: Parenting outside of wedlock.



"Institution" being defined as "something that fucks up at least half the time".

established, law, practice or custom- OED. Your cute tag line does is meaningless.


You have serious delusions if you beleive that the average person sits around thinking about the genaral state of gays.

Of course they don't.  They have better things to do.  But when two guys want to marry each other, then they start thinking about it.  Such a thing would make their lives better, and you clearly don't want that.

Gratuitous assertion- You cannot know what I want. Why don't you take my word that I believe exactly what I say and leave it at that. I think you enjoy playing the martyr.


Posted by: captkidney at March 30, 2007 11:12 AM (uQDzC)

47 The burden of argument and persuasion is on the folks who want to change millennia-old human institutions, not those who wish it to remain how it is. If you want to change society and alter culture, you have to have a better argument than "yeah, well why not?"


Until you do, please go away.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at March 30, 2007 01:49 PM (wmgz8)

48 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 中型货架 横梁式货架 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 纸托盘 折叠式仓储笼 仓库笼 钢制料箱 工具柜 工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 仓库货架 中量A型货架 仓储货架 横梁式货架 货位式货架 托盘 塑料托盘 钢制托盘 纸托盘 仓储笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓库笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 中型货架 横梁式货架 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 纸托盘 折叠式仓储笼 仓库笼 钢制料箱 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 上海货架 北京货架 轻型货架 中型货架 搁板式货架 重型货架 横梁式货架 托盘货架 托盘 木托盘 纸托盘 木塑托盘 托盘 钢托盘 塑料托盘 钢制托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 手推车 静音手推车 铁板手推车 物料架 整理架 挂板架 钢制料箱 钢制周转箱 网格式料箱 料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车 电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 半电动堆高车 手动叉车 塑料周转箱 物流箱 塑料化工桶 塑料卡板箱 工具柜 上海工具柜 南京工具柜 抽屉柜 工作台 工作桌 南京工作台 上海工作台 刀具车 刀具柜 刀具架 刀具座 工具柜 工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 仓库货架 中量A型货架 仓储货架 中量B型货架 库房货架 横梁式货架 货位式货架 钢托盘 钢制托盘 铁托盘 栈板 塑料托盘 塑料栈板 纸托盘 栈板 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 钢制料箱 钢质周转箱 网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车 托盘搬运车 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 中型货架 横梁式货架 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 纸托盘 折叠式仓储笼 仓库笼 钢制料箱 工具柜 工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车 仓库货架 中量A型货架 仓储货架 中量B型货架 库房货架 横梁式货架 货位式货架 钢托盘 钢制托盘 铁托盘 栈板 塑料托盘 塑料栈板 纸托盘 栈板 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 蝴蝶笼 储物笼 钢制料箱 钢质周转箱 网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车 托盘搬运车 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 塑料托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 塑料托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 铁托盘 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 托盘 钢托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 托盘 塑料托盘 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架公司 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架 货架 货架 货架 轻量型货架 角钢货架 货架 中量型货架 次重型货架 货位式货架 重量型货架 横梁式货架 仓储货架 阁楼式货架 钢平台 仓储货架 悬臂式货架 仓储货架 贯通式货架 通廊式货架 驶入式货架 仓库货架 库房货架 抽屉式货架 模具货架 仓库货架 库房货架 汽车4S店货架 汽配库货架 货架厂 货架公司 南京货架 上海货架 无锡货架 苏州货架 货架厂 货架公司 北京货架 天津货架 沈阳货架 大连货架 货架厂 货架公司 广州货架 深圳货架 宁波货架 杭州货架 南京货架 货架公司 货架厂 仓库货架 仓储货架 货架 货架

Posted by: peterwei at June 23, 2008 09:49 PM (sx3L8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
109kb generated in CPU 0.19, elapsed 1.5308 seconds.
62 queries taking 1.4622 seconds, 284 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.