June 29, 2006

NYU Professor: We'll Give Republicans One More Chance To Lose Elections, And Then We Start A Civil War
— Ace

That seems to be what this Arianna Huffington moonbat is saying.

As it's inconceivable that liberals could lose any election, it must be the case that the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections were stolen. He's kind enough to give us one more chance to demonstrate we're not cheating -- by losing -- and then he wants to go Ukrainian on us.

Posted by: Ace at 10:36 AM | Comments (87)
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Civil War, eh? I guess that guy is implying that Democrats would actually know how to win a war. Ha!

Posted by: Larry Jones at June 29, 2006 10:39 AM (ieLr1)

2 So, I should sell my stocks in Diebold on election night and use the profits to buy a really big gun?

Posted by: ErikW at June 29, 2006 10:47 AM (0m1lu)

3 And Then We Start A Civil War

Allow me to be the first to say... eh, ok.

Posted by: Mark V. at June 29, 2006 10:47 AM (2ipxY)

4 Post Election Selection Trauma at its worst.

Posted by: Watcher at June 29, 2006 10:47 AM (3QqZ0)

5 You will start a civil war? You and what army?

Posted by: Tushar D at June 29, 2006 10:48 AM (tyRhL)

6 Nannies aren't inclined to ask what children think. If they do, and the kids don't give the right answer, SOMEONE is going to bed without a cookie.

Posted by: Clark at June 29, 2006 10:50 AM (Hj7D9)

7 ... Live free or Diebold ...

Posted by: Blacksheep at June 29, 2006 10:51 AM (kVUW4)

8 Ukranian? Moose and Squirrel must die!!

Posted by: JackStraw at June 29, 2006 10:51 AM (J8+2b)

9 He's right! People hate the Republicans! And they hate the Democrats! It is inconceivable that we didn't legitimately win!

The elections were stolen! Go Ukranian, my brothers!

Posted by: Libertarians at June 29, 2006 10:53 AM (2XXia)

10 How long do you think it will take for this guy to try to organize some sort of Phoenix Project?

I'll bet you anything that by the time 2008 rolls around he will either have gotten himself thrown in jail or gunned down by the Capitol Police.

Posted by: Watcher at June 29, 2006 10:54 AM (3QqZ0)

11 Can't wait.

Posted by: CT at June 29, 2006 10:55 AM (1aV59)

12 isn't that sedition?

Posted by: Wickedpinto at June 29, 2006 10:56 AM (QTv8u)

13 Mark Crispin Miller, huh? Seems like a neutral, unbiased academic voice to me /s:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=%22mark+crispin+miller%22&spell=1

Posted by: The Ivory Tower at June 29, 2006 10:57 AM (kVUW4)

14 OK, Let me get this straight. The people that believe in a total banning of firearms wants to take on the people that believe in the 2nd ammendment. Right.... Knock yourself out but remember that Shtetl G will let the pistol smoke before he falls for the Okey-doke.

Posted by: Shtetl G at June 29, 2006 10:59 AM (VOWis)

15 I get a little thrill every time a leftist suggests civil war.

Not because I think they'll succeed, or anything, but because I remember which side is armed and which is not.

Posted by: leoncaruthers at June 29, 2006 10:59 AM (7iTO9)

16 Name your time and place moonbat.

These guys are living in a really insular world to believe this crap.

They had control of Congress for the better part of the last century. Then again the Soviets ran Russia for seventy years. And the Dinosaurs ruled the whole damn planet. Things change. Life's unfair. Get a helmet.

Posted by: Iblis at June 29, 2006 11:01 AM (9221z)

17 [sarcasm]

You know, by using the phrase "go Ukrainian," he could just be saying that the Dems want to take over the white slavery/child porn business from the UN Peacekeepers in Europe.

He's a professor, after all, so he's already got it figured how that wouldn't be an immoral thing at all.

[/sarcasm]

Posted by: ccwbass at June 29, 2006 11:01 AM (/ghqx)

18 Yawn. How long have the DUmbshits and Kos Kool-Aid Brigade been flinging the feces about "revolution?"

Don't sing it, bring it!

Posted by: Meekrob at June 29, 2006 11:02 AM (d3avk)

19 I think I will call this: Pre-emptive strife.

If only the Denver Mavericks had thought of this before the NBA finals! "Hey, if Miami wins, then we know they cheated."

If what this idiot is saying were really true, then why hold elections in the first place??????

Posted by: MagicalPat at June 29, 2006 11:03 AM (fhkva)

20 PLACE YOUR BETS:

50,000 right-leaning, pro-american "hicks" with scoped, 30-06 high-powered deer rifles...

vs.

20,000 daily-kos readin, kumbya-singin, nancy-boy hippies

Posted by: at June 29, 2006 11:03 AM (Gi7oA)

21 A civil war waged by people who are incapable of being civil and know nothing about war. They are going to have to pad the script to make a full length movie out of this.

Posted by: Stephen Macklin at June 29, 2006 11:03 AM (DdRjH)

22 where's the 'Strong. Smart' tag to close?

I love that thing.

Posted by: BumperStickerist at June 29, 2006 11:04 AM (PcDvW)

23 I think someone needs to say what needs to be said here: The 2056 elections are going to be stolen. Yeah, I said it. I don't care what happens to me. It's about freedom. Mine, my future children, future grandchildren and all that.

We'll give the parties 26 more chances to get it right, but will it happen? Let's face it, we know it won't.

We need to protest the theft of the 2056 congressional elections NOW. Huge marches in Washington or whatever area is most convenient to you guys. We'll show the powers that be that THE PEOPLE WILL NOT BE SILENCED.

Posted by: at June 29, 2006 11:05 AM (6OXJz)

24 The above post was me, but I'm worried that signing it will lead to my "disappearance". But if you don't see me, you know what's happened! I WONT LET KARL ROVE MAKE ME LIVE IN FEAR!!!

Posted by: Shawn, but not lowercased shawn at June 29, 2006 11:07 AM (fEsWf)

25 Shit like this never fails to crack me up. After forty years of pushing gun control, aren't liberals aware that conservatives have all the guns?

What the hell is the left going to use, man? Harsh language?

Posted by: Brett at June 29, 2006 11:20 AM (8rhGt)

26 Hey, they're all about civil disobedience. Reverberations of The Great Riots of '06 with a near total shutdown of of of (crap, I got nuthin' . Blockbuster Video stores across the nation maybe?).

Well expect to read all about it in the blogs.

Posted by: Gordon at June 29, 2006 11:26 AM (GzHh/)

27 I'm going to personally steal the 2006 election. I've got a hiding place for it 'n ever'thang.

Posted by: Ed Snate at June 29, 2006 11:27 AM (W0un0)

28 A week after the civil war begins the Democrats will declare it a quagmire and demand that the Republicans pull out.

It's an ironclad strategy!

Posted by: The Warden at June 29, 2006 11:32 AM (8WTw1)

29 Look at the bright side: They just conceded that they expect to lose in 2006.

Posted by: shawn at June 29, 2006 11:35 AM (yp3GE)

30 Somewhat OT: If the Democrats need help getting out the vote, the City of New Orleans is having a great sale on slightly used schoolbuses.

Posted by: lauraw at June 29, 2006 11:35 AM (sqea/)

31 This demonstrates a lack of understanding of what was at the heart of the Orange Revolution.

But what can you expect from a guy named Crispin?

Tough guy. Tough talk.

Posted by: PineCurtain at June 29, 2006 11:37 AM (PGt28)

32 Does this mean that there will be parades of nude suicide bombers and IED equipped drum circles in Berkeley???

Posted by: rw at June 29, 2006 11:42 AM (aVixU)

33 Crispin: Americans must finally go Ukrainian...

Maybe he meant that in the Beatles sense:

Well the Ukraine girls really knock me out
They leave the west behind
And Moscow girls make me sing and shout
They Georgia's always on my my my my my my my my my mind...
Oh, show me round your snow peaked
mountain way down south...


Way, way down south. Oh, yeah; goin' Ukrainian...

One can imagine Crispin's Kiev nightclub argument: "He did too steal it - and press freedom is not releva - Hey, I'm the one lecturing here!

Posted by: tex at June 29, 2006 11:47 AM (iaV9O)

34 He's an NYU professor, so when he and his...whatever decide to take it into the streets, he's talking storming Washington Square Park, because no way would Bloomberg give them a permit.

The NYPD's "Atlas" teams would come down on their heads like hammers on nails, then iit's off to the Tombs, where they'll get nailed on the other end.

Bring it, hippie!

Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin at June 29, 2006 11:51 AM (kd/kM)

35 Crispin and tough? How about when George McFly sidles up to the soda fountain in "Back to the Future."

"Lou, give me a milk. Chocolate."

Posted by: ErikW at June 29, 2006 11:54 AM (XZaZf)

36 I hope these left wingers are ready to have their asses kicked and shipped back to europe, where they belong!

Posted by: The Boodge at June 29, 2006 12:04 PM (HJT7N)

37 Before you get too confident about us winning the civil war because Liberals are opposed to guns, remember that they're all hypocrites. Their guns are ok; it's other people's (like yours and mine) that they have a problem with. I can't remember who it was now, but there was a story out a couple years ago about some mildly famous gun-control advocate... shooting up some burglar.

Posted by: chris at June 29, 2006 12:09 PM (uwYCg)

38 I'd take ten hillbillies (I mean that in an endearing way) with .30-06s over a hundred liberals with handguns. It wouldn't even be fair.

Posted by: ErikW at June 29, 2006 12:31 PM (ftRif)

39 The Denver Mavericks?

Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 29, 2006 12:32 PM (Hocvw)

40 I'm very confident, chris. Not just because of gun control but for many reasons.

Consider this one. Mr. Miller firmly believes that the US is so corrupt that the last two national elections were stolen. And he's not alone, go read kos or DU for a while. They ALL believe it. And what's their response? Dick. Well not completely dick, they are warning us that if we do it again they are gonna be really, REALLY pissed. Next time.

Please.

Posted by: JackStraw at June 29, 2006 12:35 PM (rnOZq)

41 Their guns are ok; it's other people's (like yours and mine) that they have a problem with.

OK, then we take out Rosie O'Donnell's and Sharon Stone's bodyguards first.

Posted by: Gordon at June 29, 2006 12:37 PM (8WL8T)

42 Yeah his logic seems to be "since polls have the GOP so low in congress, then they must lose the election." This ignores the fact that the Democrats poll even lower, and presumes that polls are accurate and elections are not. I take the opposite position: polls are almost totally untrustworthy and elections are the only real metric for American views on a subject.

But when you're as wholly and deliberately out of touch with reality like these extreme nutbar moonbats, if they lose, they were ripped off. It can't be that people don't like their ideas or that they're wrong, no it's corruption! It's a bizarre, complex conspiracy!

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 29, 2006 12:39 PM (Pwzb0)

43 What would happen if they threw a civil war, and no one showed up?

Posted by: Uniball at June 29, 2006 12:41 PM (27iEn)

44 I'll take the "hicks" over the nancy boys any day.
Is nancy boys the current day or PC way of calling them sissies?

Posted by: RoyalOak at June 29, 2006 12:44 PM (/hGhX)

45 it's probably best to stick with "nancy boys"

Posted by: Ozzie Guillen at June 29, 2006 12:54 PM (yHvEo)

46 I imagine this is the kind of crazy, whiney asswipe CheChe's kid is going to grow up to be.

Posted by: Drew at June 29, 2006 01:02 PM (Y2fNF)

47 Those fucking Che shirts make for perfect targets.

Posted by: Uniball at June 29, 2006 01:06 PM (27iEn)

48 Che looks like a monkey from Planet of the Apes.

Posted by: Gumbo at June 29, 2006 01:07 PM (27iEn)

49 Yes, "nancy boys" is timeless. Nobody wants to be called that.

Posted by: ErikW at June 29, 2006 01:13 PM (ftRif)

50 Hey - I believe the guy.

Since, by definition, there's nothing wrong with the liberal "message", the electorate by definition votes for liberals. Yet, republicans are winning. The only rational conclusion is the elections have been rigged.

Q.E.D.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 29, 2006 01:17 PM (JuWpl)

51 Where that may take us I can't say.

To the grave if you get alll skippy and stupid.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 29, 2006 01:34 PM (Hocvw)

52 shit

-l

Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 29, 2006 01:35 PM (Hocvw)

53 What's so civil about war, anyway? *chomp*

Posted by: Axle Rose at June 29, 2006 01:41 PM (9h6vV)

54 It is sort of amusing to see some graying Berkeley professor or skinny vegan murse-carrying lib wheeze about civil war and rising up to fight the MAN!

Yeah, we'll be right here when you come at us with a flower.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at June 29, 2006 01:44 PM (Pwzb0)

55 Watch your ass, Axle.

Posted by: Stockholm Police at June 29, 2006 02:17 PM (7o2Kr)

56 When these liberals revolt, will it be more like "fast" zombies or "slow" zombies?

Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 29, 2006 02:46 PM (JuWpl)

57 What would happen if they threw a civil war, and no one showed up?

That's the question now isn't it? Given the general spinelessness of Republicans, I wouldn't put it past them to lay down their arms and surrender, just like the French.

Just saying. Don't count on any Republicans to stand up to this bullshit. Instead, bet on them to lay down and take it in the ass.

Posted by: M at June 29, 2006 02:46 PM (3bFaP)

58 Well, yeah. Democrats represent the voice of The People™. Therefore, any time Democrats lose, of course it's illegitimate.

Posted by: Brendan at June 29, 2006 03:01 PM (V14ir)

59 Does Birkenstock make combat "mandels"?

Posted by: elliot at June 29, 2006 03:03 PM (slB2b)

60 Given that most of the army is red state republican, this civil war should be pretty one sided. I can see it now, 90 lb. pasty emo hipsters with no color tone, middle aged bobos and media figures at the frontline with rolled up Harper's, Atlantic Monthlies and McSweeney's along with hot lattes ready for battle....should be great.

Posted by: T. at June 29, 2006 03:25 PM (5YMbd)

61 Would patchulli oil be considered a chemical weapon?

Or worse yet, what if they stopped drenching themselves in patchulli? The stink would knock a buzzard off the shit wagon at 100 clicks...

Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at June 29, 2006 03:26 PM (QWMO/)

62 I thought we were going to have to wait for a 'leader' in the conservative world to stand up and start the revolution to get rid of the communist, the ACLU, the SCOTUS, and about 80% of the dumocrat party. Now if the Lefties will only start it we're more than willing and ready to finish it. They'll last about 24 hours and then we'll have to dig them out of their hiding places in the sewer, (hanging onto their friend Osama). I guess since they've been slinging sh** for so long they are already capable of eating it to survive a few days. Bunch of gutless wonders.

Posted by: Scrapiron at June 29, 2006 03:53 PM (NpQqC)

63 I missed the white child rape/porno post. He's a professor? He isn't by chance from Colorado is he? Didn't they just change their state law to make child rape legal? Evidently the high altitude make the dongs grow small so they want to marry a 12 year old.

Posted by: Scrapiron at June 29, 2006 03:59 PM (NpQqC)

64 Who the hell is Axle Rose?

Posted by: Axl Rose at June 29, 2006 04:01 PM (Ffvoi)

65 I think I read an article mocking this book in the weekly standard a few weeks ago. Wasn't the civil war started by a dem. winning a contested election? Then conservatives started beating the shit out of them at football games etc...

It's nonsese either way. Alot of odd "Bushco" slang from a prof though.

Posted by: mike s. at June 29, 2006 05:17 PM (wFBkf)

66 This is the same old, same old. There are still liberals who refuse to believe Reagan won fair and square. They still peddle the "October Surprise" discredited conspiracy theory to explain how he beat Carter. When Reagan died a liberal friend of mine tried to peddle this B.S. to me. You know, "the People" are on their side. So how could a conservative ever actually win an fair election?

Posted by: huck at June 29, 2006 05:25 PM (CiPBL)

67 Heres another itellectiual jackass who should join WARD CHURCHILL on the unemployment line or at least shoot craps in SING SING

Posted by: spurwing plover at June 29, 2006 05:43 PM (UdEnh)

68 As I used to say in TOPGUN, "The threat is inversely proportional to the bullshit!"

Posted by: Colonel Jerry USMC(ret.) at June 29, 2006 07:22 PM (4gHqM)

69 "As it's inconceivable that liberals could lose any election, it must be the case that the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections were stolen."

Reminds me of when Reagan won re-election (in a landslide if memory serves me correctly) "I don't understand it, nobody I know voted for him!"

That's the trouble with moonbats, they roost in groups, and don't get out and socialize much during the day.

Posted by: Yankee Division Son at June 29, 2006 07:28 PM (KvTDw)

70 I preferred it when they threatened secession after the 2004 elections. I could actually get behind that idea. After all, we realized the states couldn't get along 145 years ago. But nobody up North wanted to listen. Now they're finally singing our tune.

Posted by: jhc at June 29, 2006 08:22 PM (+lA9g)

71 Screw who has the guns, the training, and most of the veterans. Take a look at the election map and see who lives where the food is grown... Things are gonna get awful hungry in Blueland come The Revolution®.

Posted by: Cybrludite at June 30, 2006 12:00 AM (XFoEH)

72 PLACE YOUR BETS:

50,000 right-leaning, pro-american "hicks" with scoped, 30-06 high-powered deer rifles...

vs.

20,000 daily-kos readin, kumbya-singin, nancy-boy hippies
Posted by at June 29, 2006 04:03 PM

Let's see, for every 10,000 "nancy boys" 2 "hicks" will die.
And that will be from natural causes or accident.
Can I bet my mortgage on this sure thing?

Posted by: The Real Steve at June 30, 2006 01:25 AM (Z2KQp)

73 The only way the liberal side won the REAL Civil War is by preserving the appearance of legality. They waited for the South to shoot first, thus winning the great majority of decent citizens over to the side of law and order.

We have to do the same. We must not, not, no matter how painfully tempting, shoot first. Let THEM shoot first, and we have not just us, but everyone else except the moonbats on our side.

And then we can finish these bastards once and for all. And get back to having a foreign policy again.

Posted by: Steve Johnson at June 30, 2006 02:29 AM (aeos0)

74 In the words of my personal hero Eric Cartman

'DIE HIPPIE, DIE'

Posted by: Bandit at June 30, 2006 03:00 AM (d2Hfk)

75 The fire next time?

Oh goody. I'll bring the marshmallows.

Posted by: slinkybender at June 30, 2006 03:07 AM (H6TIs)

76 Screw who has the guns, the training, and most of the veterans. Take a look at the election map and see who lives where the food is grown... Things are gonna get awful hungry in Blueland come The Revolution®.

Let's be fair. While the grain/beef/pork/chicken/dairy-belt is in RedState America, remember most of the fruits and nuts are grown in TruBlu Kali-fornia.

Posted by: Joe Mama at June 30, 2006 03:41 AM (5WEQS)

77 Have you seen the ad? where the farmer is tired of his whimpy scarecrow and builds a robot exterminator that dont stop with crows there RABBITS,FOXES and HIPPYS

Posted by: spurwing plover at June 30, 2006 04:03 AM (4yJRe)

78 Regarding the outburst by this red-diaper doper baby, I think i can break it down to its essential level.

"WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!"

Geez, those sour grapes must really be bitter.

Posted by: exdem13 at June 30, 2006 04:29 AM (NRrvx)

79 We'll be okay, Joe Mama. Lots of vegetables grown in Florida, Coastal Bend of Texas, Ohio (believe it or not!--third largest processing tomato crop in America). Good apple crop in Ohio too. We can carve off Wisconsin and Minnesota for more processing vegetables if we need 'em, along with Michigan and Western Pennsylvania for tree fruit. Plenty of pecans, melons, and veggies in the Carolinas and Georgia, too.

But ladies and gentlemen, WE MUST NOT ALLOW A GIANT PAPIER-MACHE-HEAD GAP!

Posted by: Oldsmoblogger at June 30, 2006 07:50 AM (6W2zl)

80 Mark Crispin Miller:

Before the 'war' is over, I will cut out your beating heart and eat it before your eyes.

Posted by: Barry at June 30, 2006 08:05 AM (kKjaJ)

81 Finally .. a blog with some stones ! A few months ago I posted in a moonbat blog ( truthdig I think ) and commented that maybe a civil war could settle some of the differences between real Americans and the closet tinfoil hat wearing communists that inhabit this country .. holy smokes ! within three posts, I was tried and found guilty of sedetion ! smelled like fear to me .. I 'm sure in the back of their puny minds they know that if it ever came to that - their way of life would come to a screeching halt .

Posted by: Tanker at June 30, 2006 10:59 AM (GcDGb)

82 There's a eason for the saying: "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach."

NYU professor. I wonder if he's ever seen a weapon, much less fired one.

I wonder how many jerk-offs would follow this guy across the street for ice cream, much less into a battle.

Heck, I wonder if he even knows how to drive.

It's going to be a long wait.

Posted by: MarkD at July 01, 2006 10:54 AM (X9njN)

83 Silly rabbits,
they're not going to beat us on the battlefield.

They will beat us in the courtroom.

Posted by: Bart at July 01, 2006 11:03 AM (0jNrd)

84 SILLY RABBIT TRIX ARE FOR KIDS

Posted by: spurwing plover at July 02, 2006 02:05 PM (S97cI)

85 They do have an Army, 22 million illegal aliens, and a lot of them have guns. No shit... you should see all the tatoo mexicans in AZ. They are commies, Mecha boys and plain gang creeps, plus all the tatoo white boys that wil join them for the oportunity to loot and rape. We need to watch out here

Posted by: roverlman2006 at July 02, 2006 06:29 PM (CxLTy)

86 Great work!
My homepage | Please visit

Posted by: David at July 30, 2006 08:10 AM (FMBsN)

87 Curious to determine what all you intellectuals need to say about this?-?-.

Posted by: Proenza Schouler PS11 at May 23, 2012 03:41 PM (J+UiC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
110kb generated in CPU 0.11, elapsed 1.2373 seconds.
62 queries taking 1.153 seconds, 323 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.