April 30, 2015

NYT, Boston Globe Both Report That Different Structures of the Clinton Foundation Deliberately Hid Money
— Ace

Ed Morrissey does a good job of summing up at Hot Air.

This New York Times article by, again, Mike McIntire and Jo Becker shreds the Clintons' claims that Canadian law forces them to hide their money and donor lists. Mollie Hemingway reported this yesterday in the Federalist -- a scoop, I'm pretty sure.

Today, the NYT follows up on Sean Davis' work and adds a little bit.

The Clintons' defense here is that they could not comply with their agreement to disclose donors to the State Department, because Canadian law prohibits such disclosures. Sean Davis called up some experts and found out that just wasn't true.

Here's what McIntire and Becker found.


Aides to former President Bill Clinton helped start a Canadian charity that effectively shielded the identities of donors who gave more than $33 million that went to his foundation, despite a pledge of transparency when Hillary Rodham Clinton became secretary of state.

The nonprofit, the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada), operates in parallel to a Clinton Foundation project called the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, which is expressly covered by an agreement Mrs. Clinton signed to make all donors public while she led the State Department. However, the foundation maintains that the Canadian partnership is not bound by that agreement and that under Canadian law contributors’ names cannot be made public.

The foundation cited that restriction last weekend in explaining why it did not disclose $2.35 million in donations from the chairman of Uranium One, the subject of an article in The New York Times last week....

"This is hardly an effort on our part to avoid transparency," said Maura Pally, acting chief executive of the Clinton Foundation, as she took new efforts to avoid transparency.

I may have altered the end of that sentence.


Instead, the foundation said that the partnership was created by the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra to allow Canadian donors to get a tax benefit for supporting his work with Mr. Clinton -- a benefit that came with the price of respecting Canada's privacy laws. On Wednesday, the partnership issued a statement citing a legal opinion that "charitable donors have an expectation and right of privacy."


However, interviews with tax lawyers and officials in Canada cast doubt on assertions that the partnership was necessary to confer a tax benefit; an examination shows that for many donors it was not needed, and in any event, since 2010, Canadians could have donated to the foundation directly and received the same tax break. Also, it is not at all clear that privacy laws prohibit the partnership from disclosing its donors, the tax lawyers and officials in Canada said.

The partnership, established in 2007, effectively shielded the identities of its donors -- and the amount they gave -- by allowing them to bundle their money together in the offshoot Canadian partnership before it was passed along to Clinton Foundation programs. The foundation, in turn, names only the partnership as the source of those funds.

...

The partnership might have been necessary to provide a tax benefit to early individual donors, but not since 2010. That year, the Clinton Foundation was specially designated by the Canadian government, allowing Canadians to write off donations given directly to it.

"It makes no tax difference," Mr. Blumberg said, "whether a donor gives the money to a Canadian charity or the Clinton Foundation."

....

How many more such entities exist, or might be created in the future, is also unclear. A search of charity registrations in Britain, for instance, found a William J. Clinton Foundation UK that has raised about $1.5 million for a climate change initiative. Foundation officials said those donations were made public.

...

Mr. Blumberg, the tax lawyer, said that while privacy laws would prohibit charities from misusing donor information for commercial purposes, they generally did not otherwise prevent disclosure of donors. But, he said, laws in the province of British Columbia -- where the Clinton Giustra partnership is set up --- are stricter. But even there, he said, a charity could arrange for disclosure of donors if it wanted to, something Mr. Giustra is now saying he will attempt to do.

Ed Morrissey makes a great point about this, which I think actually Becker and McIntire want to make, but don't, out of journalistic professionalism:

If the specific rules of British Columbia just happened to appear, on the surface, to be stricter about disclosing donor information, isn't it terribly convenient the Clintons and their eternal Mob Lawyer Bruce Lindsey incorporated there, as opposed to much-more-convenient Toronto or Quebec?

It sure looks like the Clintons went forum shopping to specifically find someplace where the tax laws could be misconstrued -- or pretended to be misconstrued, rather -- to shield their donors from disclosure.

More "mistakes were made" in Boston, it turns out.

An unprecedented ethics promise that played a pivotal role in helping Hillary Rodham Clinton win confirmation as secretary of state, soothing senators' concerns about conflicts of interests with Clinton family charities, was uniformly bypassed by the biggest of the philanthropies involved.


The Clinton Health Access Initiative never submitted information on any foreign donations to State Department lawyers for review during Clinton's tenure from 2009 to 2013, Maura Daley, the organization's spokeswoman, acknowledged to the Globe this week. She said the charity deemed it unnecessary, except in one case that she described as an "oversight."

During that time, grants from foreign governments increased by tens of millions of dollars to the Boston-based organization.

Daley’s acknowledgement was the first by the charity of the broad scope of its apparent failures to fulfill the spirit of a crucial political pledge made by the Clinton family and their charities. The health initiative has previously acknowledged failing only to disclose the identity of its contributors, another requirement under the agreement.

You can read the rest at the Boston Globe. You get the idea.

So... what can you say?

I do note this move the Clintons always make. See if you've seen this before.

Step One: The Clintons claim they didn't break the law because their departure from regular order was justified by a technicality.

Step Two: You look into this alleged technicality that the Clintons claim saves them from being felons, and you find that it doesn't apply -- they're misinterpreting it (almost certainly deliberately).

Step Three: You tell them: Your lawbreaking is not excused by this claimed technicality, because you are deliberately misinterpreting the law to claim this technicality.

Step Four: Now they bat innocent eyes at you and ask: "Why are you focusing on mere technicalities when there are such important issues to be dealt with?!"

Then they turn to their partisan supporters in the public, jab their thumbs in your direction, and say "Ha, ha, look at these silly people who spend all day talking about technicalities in the law."

Correction: Ed Morrissey wrote the article, not Noah Rothman. Sorry. I've just been linking Rothman a lot lately.

Another Correction: It was Mollie Hemingway, not Sean Davis, who broke the story about the Clintons lying about Canadian laws about disclosure.


Posted by: Ace at 05:46 AM | Comments (281)
Post contains 1211 words, total size 8 kb.

1 This is why Hillary will still win.


Boldly.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider, Keeper of the Guards at April 30, 2015 05:48 AM (fwARV)

2 Call me Nana.

Posted by: hillary the horrible at April 30, 2015 05:49 AM (JMb/Y)

3 The Iranian Rat Face is ratting her out everywhere and for once the liberal press is ready to stomp a commie.


And she belongs in jail.

Posted by: Vic[/i] We Have No Party at April 30, 2015 05:49 AM (wlDny)

4 I am emboldened by this new thread.

Posted by: Rusty Nail at April 30, 2015 05:49 AM (jqUAa)

5 Hillary who?

Posted by: Josh Earnest at April 30, 2015 05:50 AM (LISuA)

6 I feel very strongly about this!

Posted by: MTF at April 30, 2015 05:50 AM (LISuA)

7

Bold face lying by Bold faced liars.

 

This is surprising?

Posted by: nnptcgrad at April 30, 2015 05:50 AM (Mxs5H)

8

I noted yesterday that the word 'scofflaw' cannot be used to describer inner city rioters, because it is an official term to describe members of the DNC.

 

I think the more relevant    issue to discuss is     why democrats are never    prosecuted for obvious felonies.

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (ZkzmI)

9 You folks have no fucking idea how expensive a really good walker can be!

Posted by: Hillary! at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (LISuA)

10 I will boldly point out once again that the Clinton Foundation webstie is now scrubbed of any mention of a "unique business model."

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (659DL)

11 Does this font make my ass look fat?

Posted by: johnd01 at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (ukNFU)

12 That's some pretty bold prognosticating there, Ace.

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (zF6Iw)

13 If we cap-lock while bold, it may cause a tear in the space-time continuum.

Posted by: Citizen Cake at April 30, 2015 05:51 AM (PtTYB)

14

seen at weaselzippers:

Bernie Sanders "should be helpful in getting Hillary to run to the left, making her more unpalatable in the general election."

I'm thinking th opposite, that Sanders will be used to make Hillary! look more moderate.

Posted by: mallfly at April 30, 2015 05:52 AM (qSIlh)

15 Come to meeee. -The Barrel

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 05:52 AM (Sf+do)

16 re 8: Sen Menendez..?

Posted by: mallfly at April 30, 2015 05:52 AM (qSIlh)

Posted by: Hector, in the basement, with the Cheetos at April 30, 2015 05:52 AM (RD7QR)

18 You bastids, all that money will be mine someday. I told you we have been found to be the most transparent of any of the charities. America wants a woman for president and mommie is the best choice. Mom will be able to pardon Dad. Pretty neat huh? --Chelsea

Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (wkuqO)

19 BOLD NOISES!

Posted by: Brick Tamland at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (vgIRn)

20 If we cap-lock while bold, it may cause a tear in the space-time continuum. Just don't divide by zero and we'll be ok.

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (Sf+do)

21 Close the bold tag, ace. And sorry about the nasty, orange-fingered sock.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (RD7QR)

22 Coincidentally,    a Daley    in the mix?

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (ZkzmI)

23

Awwww. It's fixed, at least for the thread.

Posted by: nnptcgrad at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (Mxs5H)

24 Close tags FTW!

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (Sf+do)

25 Damn, these guys are good!

Posted by: Al Capone at April 30, 2015 05:53 AM (JO9+V)

26 God has de-bolded us, for we have sinned.

Posted by: Citizen Cake at April 30, 2015 05:54 AM (PtTYB)

27

I would normally be surprised at the Globe for reporting anything critical of Scankles, but considering their bow-tied bumkissers are champing at the bit for  Fauxcahontas to run, it's an interesting development.

 

But all in all, I think Ace's pessimism is warranted.   Scankles' felchers will scream, "what difference, at this point, does it make?" and the leathery old Jean Nate-drenched hag will pull a Boss Tweed:  "what are you going to do about it?"

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 05:54 AM (zF6Iw)

28 Have you noticed that the clinton campaign is not at all phased by these stunning revelations? She's out there trying to capture the thug and felon vote.

Posted by: Soothsayer says It's time to heal at April 30, 2015 05:55 AM (1BhJn)

29 I love that even the NYT has turned on the Clintons.

Posted by: Hamilton at April 30, 2015 05:55 AM (tR8og)

30
I suspect any day now Hillary will try to get away with sticking a feather in her cap and calling it macaroni.


MSNBC will then rate her A+ on cooking skills.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 30, 2015 05:56 AM (ODxAs)

31 But all in all, I think Ace's pessimism is warranted. Scankles' felchers will scream, "what difference, at this point, does it make?" and the leathery old Jean Nate-drenched hag will pull a Boss Tweed: "what are you going to do about it?" Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 10:54 AM (zF6Iw) I don't think she's accustomed to being questioned. If she makes it to the debates she might fold in spectacular fashion. It'll be interesting to see exactly how much power the socialists have in the DemonRat party.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 05:56 AM (RD7QR)

32 "Technicalities" is another way of saying "is". Big Bill Clinton

Posted by: fairweatherbill gatekeeper of pestilence at April 30, 2015 05:56 AM (o/3Hk)

33

re 20:

GNP/0= it was the winter weather!

Posted by: mallfly at April 30, 2015 05:56 AM (qSIlh)

34 Dang! It's almost like hellary all of a sudden has cooties. Or something.

Posted by: Eromero at April 30, 2015 05:56 AM (go5uR)

35 Have you noticed that the clinton campaign is not at all phased by these stunning revelations? That's because the phasers were set to stun. Cankles is a tough old bird. Set them to "fry".

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 05:57 AM (Sf+do)

36 So, I should have just taken cash, disclosed nothing, and Id be good. Damn.

Posted by: Fairfax's own, Bob McDonnell at April 30, 2015 05:58 AM (ztOda)

37 Sanders/Warren '16.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 30, 2015 05:58 AM (St6BJ)

38 The Clinton Family will go legitimate as soon as the Corleone's do.

Posted by: Mikey NTH - Ice-Cold Contempt and Fiery Furies Together at the Outrage Outlet! at April 30, 2015 05:58 AM (hLRSq)

39 33 re 20: GNP/0= it was the winter weather! Posted by: mallfly Warmest winter on record. whitehouse.gov

Posted by: fairweatherbill gatekeeper of pestilence at April 30, 2015 05:58 AM (xrURQ)

40 Ed Morrissey actually wrote that article, Ace....

Posted by: Dirty Randy at April 30, 2015 05:58 AM (jjaLl)

41 Do Americans really want to go through another eight years of this? I doubt even the LIVs do, if they were at all honest with themselves.

Posted by: pookysgirl can almost walk at April 30, 2015 05:59 AM (dCUzJ)

42 Forget it, Ace....it's Canklestown.

Posted by: Pappy O'Daniel at April 30, 2015 05:59 AM (oVJmc)

43 I don't think she's accustomed to being questioned. If she makes it to the debates she might fold in spectacular fashion. It'll be interesting to see exactly how much power the socialists have in the DemonRat party. Debates where hard questions are never answered and they drone on about how they saved the world. Where the press excludes the minor parties effectively canceling their chances of growing.

Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 05:59 AM (wkuqO)

44 No, really. She was out there yesterday saying we need sweeping criminal justice reform; saying we need to ease up on imprisonment.

Posted by: Soothsayer says It's time to heal at April 30, 2015 05:59 AM (1BhJn)

45 President Jarrett and Barry Obama will never permit a Maoist to become president. They want a Soviet style State. There was a famous statement by Barry during the 2008 campaign wherein Billy Jeff's term was dissed as "not anywhere near far enough Left" to paraphrase. These people want to go full on Police State.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 05:59 AM (S8vW1)

46 41 Do Americans really want to go through another eight years of this? I doubt even the LIVs do, if they were at all honest with themselves. Posted by: pookysgirl can almost walk at April 30, 2015 10:59 AM (dCUzJ) Reflective contemplation is not exactly the LIVs' strong point, unfortunately.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:00 AM (RD7QR)

47

41- But, but, but... Historic Vagina!

 

 

 

 

In more ways than one IYKWIMAITYD.

Posted by: nnptcgrad at April 30, 2015 06:00 AM (Mxs5H)

48 I blame Bush. That still works... right?

Posted by: Hillary! at April 30, 2015 06:00 AM (0Ew3K)

49 How do we know Team HRC isn't front loading this stuff to the media now, so it's "old news" as the election cycle moves forward.

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:00 AM (ztOda)

50

Sanders/Warren '16.


 

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 30, 2015 10:58 AM (St6BJ)

 

Full Metal Retard.

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 06:00 AM (zF6Iw)

51 Oh sure. You get up early to report when the Clintons are lying, but on all the occasions that they told the truth, you stayed in bed and said nothing. How are we suppose to believe anything from someone so biased?

Posted by: jwest at April 30, 2015 06:01 AM (9ZZd+)

52 49 How do we know Team HRC isn't front loading this stuff to the media now, so it's "old news" as the election cycle moves forward. Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 11:00 AM (ztOda) That pesky old fart Ben Gazhi is still around.

Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (wkuqO)

53 45 President Jarrett and Barry Obama will never permit a Maoist to become president. They want a Soviet style State. There was a famous statement by Barry during the 2008 campaign wherein Billy Jeff's term was dissed as "not anywhere near far enough Left" to paraphrase. These people want to go full on Police State. Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 10:59 AM (S8vW1) So is Hillary the Maoist or the Stalinist?

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (RD7QR)

54 When a guy gives to an org that supports traditional marriage he loses his job...I think donors to charities SHOULD be confidential. I also think charities out to be, I dunno....let's call it "charitable." Not "flies me around the world in luxury"-able and not "employs my campaign war team"-able.

Posted by: major major major major at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (QlI33)

55 Where's the cake?!

Posted by: Draki at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (0eidE)

56 These "technicalities" take the spotlight off of Her e-mail destruction....

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (Bn6aD)

57 I'm thinking the opposite, that Sanders will be used to make Hillary! look more moderate. Posted by: mallfly at April 30, 2015 10:52 AM (qSIlh) I'm thinking that too. Run the crazies of the party, thus making Hillary! look like a wizened grandma, fount of wisdom and reason. Meh. Luckily we have a good crop of candidates on the GOP side that will ask questions throwing her pat narrative off balance. Paul's question to Debbie gave me hope is not just RINO defeatist politics as usual. Is it enough to derail the Clinton train? We'll see.

Posted by: LizLem at April 30, 2015 06:02 AM (yRwC8)

58 Sanders/Warren '16. Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 30, 2015 10:58 AM (St6BJ) Full Metal Retard. Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 11:00 AM (zF6Iw) A little mood music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yop_RvrsEU4

Posted by: политическая шл& at April 30, 2015 06:03 AM (0Ew3K)

59 You get up early to report when the Clintons are lying, but on all the occasions that they told the truth, you stayed in bed and said nothing. How are we suppose to believe anything from someone so biased? Posted by: jwest If that were the case, then he's an insomniac with a speed habit.

Posted by: fairweatherbill gatekeeper of pestilence at April 30, 2015 06:03 AM (o/3Hk)

60 49 How do we know Team HRC isn't front loading this stuff to the media now, so it's "old news" as the election cycle moves forward. Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 11:00 AM (ztOda) Oh, that's exactly what they're doing. Hillary's handlers gamed this out a long time ago. It's just a matter of seeing how much sticks.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:03 AM (RD7QR)

61 Stalinists vs Maoists. What difference, at this point, does it make?

Posted by: Hill Dog at April 30, 2015 06:04 AM (/+zDJ)

62 I love that even the NYT has turned on the Clintons.

Posted by: Hamilton at April 30, 2015 10:55 AM (tR8og) 


You need to realize why they've turned on the Clintons - it's because they're plowing the road for Sanders/Warren.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider, Keeper of the Guards at April 30, 2015 06:05 AM (fwARV)

63 No controlling legal authority?

Posted by: Brian "Sandstorm" Williams at April 30, 2015 06:05 AM (Ft3+l)

64 Hmmm, I'm intrigued by this Maoist vs. Stalinist business. First, what's the difference? Second, wouldn't it by fun to divide and conquer them based on communist nuances? Sunni vs. Shiite, FTW

Posted by: JohnnyBoy at April 30, 2015 06:05 AM (TPjwz)

65 Where's the cake?!

The cake is a lie!

Posted by: Dirty Randy at April 30, 2015 06:05 AM (jjaLl)

66 It's even worse if Canadian law did prohibit disclosure of donors, because it's obvious that they set it up in Canada just for that purpose to skirt the transparency promised.

Posted by: Cruzinator at April 30, 2015 06:05 AM (dBm7S)

67 Maoist or the Stalinist? Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You Maoist.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 06:06 AM (S8vW1)

68 Hillary: Boxers or Briefs?

Posted by: JohnnyBoy at April 30, 2015 06:06 AM (TPjwz)

69 These "technicalities" take the spotlight off of Her e-mail destruction.... Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 11:02 AM (Bn6aD) I kind of thought it actually spot-lit why she destroyed the e-mails.

Posted by: Mikey NTH - Ice-Cold Contempt and Fiery Furies Together at the Outrage Outlet! at April 30, 2015 06:06 AM (hLRSq)

70 Hillary: Boxers or Briefs? Posted by: JohnnyBoy at April 30, 2015 11:06 AM (TPjwz) It involved "beads"... *shivers*

Posted by: Huma at April 30, 2015 06:07 AM (0Ew3K)

71 Hi Ace!

Thanks for the shout-out, but Ed Morrissey actually wrote that article on Hot Air. I wrote the one with all the errors grammitically English wise.

Posted by: Noah Rothman at April 30, 2015 06:07 AM (jjaLl)

72 Hillary:

Boxers or Briefs?

Posted by: JohnnyBoy at April 30, 2015 11:06 AM (TPjwz)




Depends

Posted by: Count de Monet at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (JO9+V)

73 Bob McDonnel still curiously unavailable for comment.

Posted by: Kreplach at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (M+ldm)

74 When you got The Boston Globe (the Globe!) chewing on your cankles, you know you're in trouble. That's as reliable as a left-wing paper that exists. They must be shitting their drawers over in Hillaryland.

Posted by: GuyfromNH at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (scUt2)

75 We didn't even get to rice cakes. Cardboard, anyone?

Posted by: Soothsayer says It's time to heal at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (1BhJn)

76 Depends Posted by: Count de Monet at April 30, 2015 11:08 AM (JO9+V) That's Bob Dole's joke. Bitch better not be stealin' from Bob Dole.

Posted by: Bob Dole at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (0Ew3K)

77 It does matter, the Stalinists starve you to death, with the Maoists we get a sharp hoe to the neck in a roadside ditch. I worry that the urban 'Utes don't know how to properly sharpen a hoe.

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:08 AM (ztOda)

78 I wrote the one with all the errors grammitically English wise. Posted by: Noah Rothman at April 30, 2015 11:07 AM (jjaLl) You do that on purpose to troll the heck out of the humorless commenters there, don't you?

Posted by: Mikey NTH - Ice-Cold Contempt and Fiery Furies Together at the Outrage Outlet! at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (hLRSq)

79 If we can't beat this tired old felon we really suck.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (g1DWB)

80 Barack Obama is a SCOAMT.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) - TrueCon at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (kff5f)

81 Burn it down. Scatter the stones. Salt the earth where it stood.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) - TrueCon at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (kff5f)

82 When you got The Boston Globe (the Globe!) chewing on your cankles, you know you're in trouble. That's as reliable as a left-wing paper that exists. They must be shitting their drawers over in Hillaryland. Posted by: GuyfromNH at April 30, 2015 11:08 AM (scUt2) Depends.

Posted by: LizLem at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (yRwC8)

83 Funnel cakes count right? You can frost them with chocolate and put candles in em.

Posted by: Draki at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (0eidE)

84 Well, and so..

Posted by: Fraddie Poormun at April 30, 2015 06:09 AM (1XNlz)

85 70 These "technicalities" take the spotlight off of Her e-mail destruction.... Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 11:02 AM (Bn6aD) I kind of thought it actually spot-lit why she destroyed the e-mails. Could be, but the emphasis is on whether or not the dealings of this "charity" were legal... Hopefully they get to the e-mail part..

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (Bn6aD)

86 It is not true that Hillary! uses a walker; she has one of those powered exoskeletons... either that or a Baron Harkonnen suit.

Posted by: [/i] [/u] [/s] [/b] An Observation at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (+KULC)

87 If we can't beat this tired old felon we really suck. Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 11:09 AM (g1DWB) DERP!

Posted by: The GOP establishment at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (0Ew3K)

88 Yes, the Clinton pattern of behavior is in full effect, as you describe. Next thing you know, some poor schlub with a "cursory" connection to the Clinton Cartel will mysteriously end up deceased in a most unlikely way.

Posted by: Fritz at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (ty633)

89 Hillary is definitely counting on the LIV . 90% of the people in my office have no clue about these issues / stories.

Posted by: Cruzinator at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (dBm7S)

90 I think Ace is right about the trend at the bottom. It works well with their idiot non thinking supporters.

Posted by: Draki at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (0eidE)

91

Hillary:


Boxers or Briefs?

 

Posted by: JohnnyBoy at April 30, 2015 11:06 AM (TPjwz)

 

http://goo.gl/MeyjXc

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (zF6Iw)

92 I'm not running. Nope. Not in a million years. No way. Honest Injun.

Posted by: Lieawatha Warren at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (8W5zZ)

93 If we can't beat this tired old felon we really suck. Put her in the back of a Baltimore paddy wagon....

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 06:10 AM (Sf+do)

94 If we can't beat this tired old felon we really suck. Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 11:09 AM (g1DWB) Challenge accepted!

Posted by: GOP Establishment, defeat fro victory snatchers extraordinaire at April 30, 2015 06:11 AM (yRwC8)

95 You do that on purpose to troll the heck out of the humorless commenters there, don't you? Posted by: Mikey NTH - Ice-Cold Contempt and Fiery Furies Together at the Outrage Outlet!

It does seem that way, doesn't it?

Posted by: Noah Rothman at April 30, 2015 06:11 AM (jjaLl)

96 It is not true that Hillary! uses a walker; she has one of those powered exoskeletons... either that or a Baron Harkonnen suit. Posted by: An Observation at April 30, 2015 11:10 AM (+KULC) Taste my Gom Jabbar!

Posted by: St. Alia of the Knife at April 30, 2015 06:11 AM (0Ew3K)

97 http://is.gd/JkWJO7

1) This is crazy.
2) Democraps don't seem to give a shit about legal immigrants.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at April 30, 2015 06:11 AM (/kI1Q)

98 You mean fried dough? That's not cake!

Posted by: Soothsayer says It's time to heal at April 30, 2015 06:11 AM (1BhJn)

99 "There is no controlling legal authority that says this was in violation of law." Use it Hillary, it worked for me.

Posted by: Al Gore at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (hdpay)

100 Look at this quote from the NYT of all places: However, interviews with tax lawyers and officials in Canada cast doubt on assertions that the partnership was necessary to confer a tax benefit; an examination shows that for many donors it was not needed, and in any event, since 2010, Canadians could have donated to the foundation directly and received the same tax break. Also, it is not at all clear that privacy laws prohibit the partnership from disclosing its donors, the tax lawyers and officials in Canada said. That's the kind of paragraph you'd find in a story about Republican lack of transparency. This isn't even "critics say," or "But opponents say." This is "We talked to some lawyers, and here is what they say." The NYT is not carrying Hillary!'s water. The Boston Globe is not carrying Hillary!'s water. She's in trouble, guys. Popcorn?

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) - TrueCon at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (kff5f)

101 I always thought the technicalities were the law.  Guess it's shows I didn't go to law school.

Posted by: huerfano at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (bynk/)

102 The Boston Globe, a notrious right wing smear outlet, is rehashing these old stories from the past just to distract from focusing on the Republican politicians that run Baltimore.    

Posted by: James Carville at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (OD2ni)

103 99 You mean fried dough? That's not cake! Unless it's a cake doughnut...

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (Bn6aD)

104
I can't stand the guy, but you can't deny that Bill had some charisma (plus likes rape), but Shrillary was not born with an iota.  Plus she's a whore.

Otherwise, they are fine people.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 30, 2015 06:12 AM (ODxAs)

105 Legal immigrants work hard, follow the law, and eventually start businesses and contribute to their communities. Why would the Democrats want more of them?

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:13 AM (ztOda)

106 The sun rose in the east and will set in the west. The Clintons are corrupt and will dance merrily.away from comeuppance. Did I miss any important news

Posted by: Russkilitlover at April 30, 2015 06:13 AM (4moAx)

107 The Iranian Rat Face

Posted by: Vic We Have No Party at April 30, 2015 10:49 AM (wlDny)

I agree about the "rat face" part, but she isn't Iranian.

Is Ted Cruz Canadian?
Is John McCain Panamanian?
Is Obama Kenyan?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 30, 2015 06:13 AM (Zu3d9)

108 Another fatal Clinton scandal which will surely bring them down! Hey, it worked so many times before, right?

Posted by: The truth at April 30, 2015 06:14 AM (ibvmu)

109 I wonder how much it hurts Hillary that Bill has been effectively sidelined by the most recent sex scandals. And it occurs to me that whoever is pushing these donor scandals probably released the Pedo Island revelations too. Somebody really has it in for Cankles.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:15 AM (RD7QR)

110 "you can't deny that Bill had some charisma (plus likes rape)"

"Rapey Charisma"

I like that a lot!

Posted by: Joe Biden at April 30, 2015 06:15 AM (jjaLl)

111 http://is.gd/JkWJO7

1) This is crazy.
2) Democraps don't seem to give a shit about legal immigrants.
Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at April 30, 2015 11:11 AM



Drugs were looted?  All I saw on the tv were the toilet paper thieves.  Color me shocked.

Posted by: huerfano at April 30, 2015 06:15 AM (bynk/)

112 It depends on what the definition of 'money laundering' is...

Posted by: Hillary's Meal Ticket at April 30, 2015 06:15 AM (NUCTk)

113 The Whore of Babylon.

Posted by: John at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (/+zDJ)

114

"That's Bob Dole's joke.

Bitch better not be stealin' from Bob Dole."

 

 

Do you realize how big I would have been if you had won?  Thanks for nothing, you limp-dicked old coot.   

Posted by: Norm MacDonald at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (OD2ni)

115 If we can't beat this tired old felon we really suck. The electorate wants stuff.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (W5DcG)

116 Obviously just a goofy theory but Obama was always known during his school days and shortly after as a hard Marxist while the Cankle! has for years favored the Chinese along with her hubby. While both Hillary! and the Lightworker followed Alinsky they had a pretty big falling out after the election and the entire Obama organization seems to be full on Socialism these days. It sounds not at all unlike the old Chino-Soviet tension where the Soviets claimed to be a "real" workers' paradise and the Heaven's Mandate of a royal Chinese class claimed their brilliant complete central control was better. Both murdered their own citizens and both nearly started a nuclear war in order to expand into the other.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (S8vW1)

117 Drugs were looted? All I saw on the tv were the toilet paper thieves. Color me shocked. Cvs has a large pharmacy.... just saying...

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (Bn6aD)

118 Ace should leave Hillary alone! She's a fine American, one who has contributed great service to the country at immeasurable personal sacrifice. Once, even, she was under heavy machine gun fire. I would be honored to be her running mate.

Posted by: Jebbie Bush at April 30, 2015 06:16 AM (LISuA)

119 The Whore of Babylon. Posted by: John at April 30, 2015 11:16 AM (/+zDJ) Dude. Not only are we not paying for that, you couldn't *pay us* enough to touch that.

Posted by: Babylon at April 30, 2015 06:17 AM (kff5f)

120 Then they turn to their partisan supporters in the public, jab their thumbs in your direction, and say "Ha, ha, look at these silly people who spend all day talking about technicalities in the law." You left out Old News and VRWC.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at April 30, 2015 06:17 AM (mf5HN)

121 http://goo.gl/MeyjXc Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 30, 2015 11:10 AM (zF6Iw) Dang, that's a lot of photo manipping on her face! Hardly recognized her. She'd be ticked if I said so but she almost looks Doris Day-esque. Almost, mind you, we can't all be miracle workers.

Posted by: LizLem at April 30, 2015 06:18 AM (yRwC8)

122 So, if HRC goes down, who do the Dims have on the bench, From Center to Insane: Jim Webb, Evah Byah, Harold Ford, Mark Warner, Jeb Bush, Andrew Cuomo, Moonbeam, Liz Warren, Sanders,

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:18 AM (ztOda)

123 I would be honored to be her running mate.

Posted by: Jebbie Bush at April 30, 2015 11:16 AM (LISuA)



Please don't juxtapose Hillary's name with the word "mate."


Thanks.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:19 AM (oKE6c)

124 >>So, if HRC goes down eww.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:19 AM (g1DWB)

125 Youse know who else had a unique business model? Fageddaboudit, capische?

Posted by: Fat Tony at April 30, 2015 06:19 AM (7ObY1)

126 Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 11:18 AM (ztOda) I'm thinking Lizzy Warren.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) - TrueCon at April 30, 2015 06:19 AM (kff5f)

127 I'm thinking Lizzy Warren. She makes Hillary! look almost Moderate...

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:20 AM (Bn6aD)

128 The "Hillary is going down" stuff is pure fantasy. She will be the Democratic nominee for president. There is absolutely no question about it. Just recognize the clear reality and deal with it.

Posted by: The truth at April 30, 2015 06:20 AM (ibvmu)

129 I'm red, rested and...not heap big ready. Not yet.

Posted by: Liawatha at April 30, 2015 06:20 AM (7ObY1)

130 I can't remember anything since I fell. And hit. My head.

Posted by: Hillary's Goo Goo Glasses at April 30, 2015 06:21 AM (NUCTk)

131 1991: That's how long America outside of Arkansas have been exposed to Clinton corruption. And yet, there they stand, unbroken and unbowed. Say what you want, but she's the nominee until she's not, and the next POTUS in all probability. We've become a stupid, unserious country, and our political landscape reflects that.

Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 30, 2015 06:21 AM (XmOA9)

132 The phrases "money laundering" and "bribes not donations" have been adjudicated as misogynist attack words and will no longer be tolerated. The left has spoken!

Posted by: Angry Feminists, a new iPhone Game at April 30, 2015 06:21 AM (LISuA)

133 They've know this crap for years. The only reason they are exposing them is that they think they can get in a more socialist candidate instead of Hillary.

Posted by: Bruce J. at April 30, 2015 06:21 AM (iQIUe)

134 Doesn't matter. Also, I've been on some disqus forums this morning. Wow, there is a lot of ignorance out there. It's really sad. Like really sad. They think they know what they're talking about, but they clearly don't. We need a national conservation (to borrow a phrase from the left) on civics and on how our government works. Most people just don't seem to get it.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:21 AM (AkOaV)

135 So basically this Clinton Fund dealio is the Enron of non-profits?

Posted by: MMW at April 30, 2015 06:22 AM (kt/h1)

136 The Lizzy Warren with the personality of a cigar store indian? Yeah that one. Another affirmative action president if she makes it. The smell of corruption there too.

Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 06:22 AM (wkuqO)

137 I can't stand the guy, but you can't deny that Bill had some charisma (plus likes rape), but Shrillary was not born with an iota. Plus she's a whore.

Otherwise, they are fine people.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk

I know you're being sarcastic, but Bill raped at least one woman  (Juanita Broderick)  years ago, and Hillary was complicit in suppressing this.

The deleted e-mails and the Clinton Global Initiative charities are just the tip of the iceberg.  We stupid plebes will never know the whole truth of this.

But we know enough.  They're sociopathic criminals and pathological liars.  And Bill was elected to two terms as President,  and Hillary still might get elected.  She's not dead until they drive a stake into her.  Literally.

Posted by: Bossy Conservative....lost in America at April 30, 2015 06:22 AM (RFeQD)

138

You left out Old News and VRWC.

 

I'm more concerned about the Vast Right-Handed Conspiracy.

 

We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 06:22 AM (JtwS4)

139 I tell you what, I am enjoying the way the far leftists are running to old Bernie.

They really think the lesson of the reelection of Obaaama was that the country is ready for out-and-out socialism.

Not that strategic voter fraud and billions of in-kind campaign contributions by the media won it. No, is was their projections on the blank slate--projections of socialism--that won the day.

I agree: This  a debate we should have.

Because socialism is unconstitutional--I don't give a fuck if the country votes for it. No more than I would stand by if communism was voted in.

Socialism is the same prison as communism--they just tell you their gulags will issue a blanket _and_ a pillow.

Oh, and as far as the fags shacking up and calling it marriage? It's not, even if the courts "vote" for it.


Posted by: RoyalOil at April 30, 2015 06:22 AM (ZvKdv)

140 It's not rape-rape when a Dem does it.

Posted by: Citizen X at April 30, 2015 06:23 AM (7ObY1)

141 123 So, if HRC goes down, who do the Dims have on the bench, From Center to Insane: Jim Webb, Evah Byah, Harold Ford, Mark Warner, Jeb Bush, Andrew Cuomo, Moonbeam, Liz Warren, Sanders, Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 11:18 AM (ztOda) Jim Webb, Evan Bayh, and Harold Ford would be moderate and thoughtful chief executives, so they're right out. Warner is a douchebag, so he has a shot. The rest are unreconstructed lefties, so they're the front-runners. The fact that you put Jeb on the list is funny.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:23 AM (RD7QR)

142 This post has been up for 37 minutes. It's old news, move along. War on wymyn! Historic first! Squirrel!

Posted by: lanny davis at April 30, 2015 06:23 AM (ChY2Q)

143 thanks for the correction, Dirty Randy, Noah.

Posted by: ace at April 30, 2015 06:23 AM (PA7DS)

144 The Dems will ride the ol' hag Hillary to death. She failed in 2008. She won't get it done now.

Posted by: thetroof at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (jmN7w)

145 Ace I'm sorry you've been linking Noah too...

the typo temptation must be overwhelming....


Posted by: Sven S Blade a.k.a. El Assassin@sven10077[/i][/b][/s] at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (/4AZU)

146 Jim Webb, Evah Byah, Harold Ford, Mark Warner, Jeb Bush, Andrew Cuomo, Moonbeam, Liz Warren, Sanders,

Posted by: Jean


Jeb Bush. I see what you did there. 

(chuckle)

Posted by: Bossy Conservative....lost in America at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (RFeQD)

147 These Clinton stories really have a lot of mileage on them. A lot like Cuban automobiles.

Posted by: Fraddie Poormun at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (1XNlz)

148 They must be shitting their drawers over in Hillaryland. Posted by: GuyfromNH at April 30, 2015 11:08 AM (scUt2)

enough with the jokes about me.

Posted by: Al Roker at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (ODxAs)

149 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4) Preach it brotha

Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 06:24 AM (sgrzZ)

150 We need a national conservation (to borrow a phrase from the left) on civics and on how our government works. Most people just don't seem to get it.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:21 AM (AkOaV)



Most definitely. We can start with how Presidents don't spend money ("But ... but ... Bush!") off their own bat, but have to have it authorized by Congress. And for extra credit, for Californian retards, we can move on to the difference between debt and deficit.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (oKE6c)

151 Hey! Who let the TepidAir crowd in? I didn't know they knew about this place...

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (AkOaV)

152 Warner is there because he has enough cash to kickstart his own run without having to go flip Hilary's donors.

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (ztOda)

153 >>I tell you what, I am enjoying the way the far leftists are running to old Bernie. The deep thinkers at DU are spooging all over themselves over Sanders. They do not appear ready for Hillary.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (g1DWB)

154 Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:25 AM (oKE6c) I was thinking more the basics. Like what the constitution is, what it says, and what it's supposed to do.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (AkOaV)

155 150 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4)


Preach it brotha

Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 11:24 AM (sgrzZ)



Everyone is born right-handed. The athletically gifted overcome it.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:25 AM (oKE6c)

156 150 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4) Not baseball, baseball favors south paws.

Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (wkuqO)

157

Thank goodness I didn't join the private sector, else I'd be doing time with

 Skilling, Fastow, Ebbers and Madoff. What me worry indeed.

Posted by: | |=|>| illary at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (xkSSa)

158 I was just reminiscing to myself about the early days of these here internets and the first blogs. Remember too, my nic at Free Republic, one of the first blogs for real 'mericans. Almost two decades of bitchin' 'bout that pair. To little or no avail. So I'm gonna pass on this thread and find some kids to chase off my lawn.

Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (xQX/f)

159 This is how the Dems launder political contributions. Okay, the Repubs probably do too but so far in my experience as a forced-dues-paying non-member of a public employee union, it's been the Dems.

In our lawsuit against the union, they had to report who they had contributed to. I still remember one line item: $7 million to the AFL-CIO. WTF? For a California union?

But now it makes sense. Disguise the donors. Move the money around under all the shells. By the time it gets to the DNC, the real donor identity has been obliterated. Boxes checked, campaign maximums observed.

Posted by: PJ at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (cHuNI)

160 Oh, and as far as the fags shacking up and calling it marriage? It's not, even if the courts "vote" for it.

GLWT


Posted by: HGTV,Travel Channel, DIY, and The CW- IN YOUR FACE at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (NUCTk)

161 Jim Webb, Evah Byah, Harold Ford, Mark Warner, Jeb Bush, Andrew Cuomo, Moonbeam, Liz Warren, Sanders, Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 11:18 AM (ztOda) =================== TFG/Val JarJar would go nuts entrusting their "fundamental transformation" to Democrats as centrist as Bayh, Ford, Warner. Even Webb has too much appeal to the right for their taste, and Moonbeam is too damn old. Lizzie must be their choice.

Posted by: MTF at April 30, 2015 06:26 AM (LISuA)

162 157 150 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4) Not baseball, baseball favors south paws. Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 11:26 AM (wkuqO) As does the sport of fencing.

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (2Ojst)

163 154 >>I tell you what, I am enjoying the way the far leftists are running to old Bernie. The deep thinkers at DU are spooging all over themselves over Sanders. They do not appear ready for Hillary. Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 11:25 AM (g1DWB) To be fair, they spooge all over themselves over Hello Kitty too, so it might not be significant.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (RD7QR)

164 Southpaws rule!

Posted by: brevity at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (jmN7w)

165 Democrats -  stabbing the country in the back and claiming it was self defense.

Posted by: [/i] [/u] [/s] [/b] An Observation at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (+KULC)

166 "We southpaws are 10% of the population" and yet all of the Hollywood Action Movie Heroes shoot left handed.

Posted by: Fraddie Poormun at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (1XNlz)

167 Posted by: PJ at April 30, 2015 11:26 AM (cHuNI) I'm sure the R's do it, too, but the D's have it down to a fucking science. So much money flowing through the sluices of "non profits" and "charities" and "union funds" and "super PACs" its impossible to know where it all originates.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (AkOaV)

168 Hey all. Just dropped in from Tepid Air. All I see is junk about cakes and boobs and some troll named Hector. Where are all the posts supporting Jeb? And what about Marco? You all aren't doing this right..

Posted by: Tepid Air Visitor at April 30, 2015 06:27 AM (7ObY1)

169

150 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us.
 
Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4)


Preach it brotha
 
Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 11:24 AM (sgrzZ)

 

*****************************************


You can correct this by having your hands surgically removed, reattached to the opposite wrists.


 

Posted by: Bruce Jenner at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (xkSSa)

170 5 Southpaws rule! Except obama..

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (Bn6aD)

171 I was thinking more the basics. Like what the constitution is, what it says, and what it's supposed to do.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:25 AM (AkOaV)



Yeah, I know. There's just so much work to be done, it's hard to know where to start. I think I'd start with the notion of separation of powers (checks and balances, and all that), which these days, with the Emperor Obongo I on the throne with his pen, gets the same treatment as the chicken cited here so often.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (oKE6c)

172 I'm going to keep saying "I'm not running" right up until the very moment I stop saying "I'm not running." And you can take that to the bank!

Posted by: Lieawatha Warren at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (8W5zZ)

173 "We southpaws are 10% of the population" Get the to the Leftorium.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) - TrueCon at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (kff5f)

174 I'm more concerned about the Vast Right-Handed Conspiracy. We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4) Wait you're a southpaw? I did not know that. Hmmm. *peers over tops of glasses* *ponders* *scribble scribble scribble*

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (mf5HN)

175 Posted by: Tepid Air Visitor at April 30, 2015 11:27 AM (7ObY1) MOAR GAY CAKE THREADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:28 AM (AkOaV)

176 176 Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:28 AM (AkOaV)

Cakegirl solves gay marriage quite ably...

//Tepid Refugee

Posted by: Sven S Blade a.k.a. El Assassin@sven10077[/i][/b][/s] at April 30, 2015 06:29 AM (/4AZU)

177 172 I was thinking more the basics. Like what the constitution is, what it says, and what it's supposed to do. Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:25 AM (AkOaV) Hmmmm, I'm starting with ballistics

Posted by: Jean at April 30, 2015 06:29 AM (ztOda)

178 150 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:22 AM (JtwS4) That's because you're sinister.

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 06:29 AM (2Ojst)

179 Tepid Air It's not that bad there.... some of the time...

Posted by: hello, it's Me Donna ....again at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (Bn6aD)

180 Not baseball, baseball favors south paws.
Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 11:26 AM (wkuqO)

As does the sport of fencing.

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 11:27 AM (2Ojst)



Boxing, too, I believe.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (oKE6c)

181 That's it, I'm going back to Tepid Air where I can express my Jeb love among real conservatives.

Posted by: Tepid Air Visitor at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (7ObY1)

182

Obama throws a baseball like he's using the wrong hand, so I don't consider him a pure southpaw.

Posted by: brevity at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (jmN7w)

183 I've noticed over the years that IT depts. have a higher population of southpaws than the general population. I've worked in depts. that were 50-60 percent lefthanded.

Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (sgrzZ)

184 apure s/b a pure...

Posted by: brevity at April 30, 2015 06:30 AM (jmN7w)

185 That's because you're sinister.

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 11:29 AM (2Ojst)



No, we're dextrous!

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (oKE6c)

186 .

Posted by: Real Brevity at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (8W5zZ)

187 183 Obama throws a baseball like he's using the wrong hand a faygeleh, so I don't consider him apure southpaw. Posted by: brevity at April 30, 2015 11:30 AM (jmN7w) FTFY

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (2Ojst)

188 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. Posted by: Bandersnatch Preach it brotha Posted by: wrg500 Amen!

Posted by: rickb223 [/s][/b][/i] at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (Sf+do)

189 Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:28 AM (oKE6c) Well, the issue that specifically set me off was gay marriage. No one seems to understand what the supreme court is or does. They think it exists to make "ignorant intolerant" people in states be more 'tolerant.'

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (AkOaV)

190
Good reminder, we still hate Ryan.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (ODxAs)

191 Hmmm. *peers over tops of glasses* *ponders* beer, wine or water

Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 06:31 AM (sgrzZ)

192 184 I've noticed over the years that IT depts. have a higher population of southpaws than the general population. I've worked in depts. that were 50-60 percent lefthanded.

Posted by: wrg500 at April 30, 2015 11:30 AM (sgrzZ)




I was in a research group of 16 that had 12 southpaws.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:32 AM (oKE6c)

193 No, we're dextrous! Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:31 AM (oKE6c) What does sugar have to do with this discussion?

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 06:32 AM (2Ojst)

194 If you think the Clintons are crooks (and clearly, they are), just watch what the Obamas do over the next decade. They'll make the Clintons look like Sunday School teachers.

Posted by: TrivialPursuer at April 30, 2015 06:32 AM (lmdHn)

195 I doubt even the LIVs do, if they were at all honest with themselves. Posted by: pookysgirl can almost walk at April 30, 2015 10:59 AM (dCUzJ) I think I see your problem.

Posted by: jwpaine at April 30, 2015 06:32 AM (0bXhD)

196 Not baseball, baseball favors south paws. Posted by: just saying at April 30, 2015 11:26 AM (wkuqO) As does the sport of fencing. Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 11:27 AM (2Ojst) Boxing, too, I believe. Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:30 AM (oKE6c) Rafael Nadal is right handed but plays tennis left handed and that seems to be working out okay for him.

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at April 30, 2015 06:33 AM (mf5HN)

197 The Northeastern media is clearly jonesing for the injun gal.

Posted by: toby928(C) at April 30, 2015 06:33 AM (evdj2)

198 Well, the issue that specifically set me off was gay marriage.

No one seems to understand what the supreme court is or does.

They think it exists to make "ignorant intolerant" people in states be more 'tolerant.'

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:31 AM (AkOaV)



That'll do it. Mine is idiots blathering about how Bush! spent so much money, never realizing that he is given a budget by Congress, and has to either take it or leave it. Every President since Washington has pined for a line item veto.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:33 AM (oKE6c)

199 Honestly, I just don't know why they just don't make people "disappear", and shit. Apparently, these Clintons read the Cliff Notes of my struggle to organise Russia properly.

Posted by: Joey Stalin, Dictator Extraordinaire at April 30, 2015 06:34 AM (8E9QA)

200 198 The Northeastern media is clearly jonesing for the injun gal. Have I mentioned that I'm not running?

Posted by: Lieawatha Warren at April 30, 2015 06:34 AM (8W5zZ)

201 The deep thinkers at DU are spooging all over themselves over Sanders. They do not appear ready for Hillary. ----- Heard an ivy league professor on the radio the other night talking up old Bernie and he fed the audience the same line the Fake Magazine Rolling Stone used: Bernie is an independent who is just like a Washington outsider because he is honest and cares and might be just a teensy bit Left of Center but that is what America wants and what America needs. If McCain wasn't running for re-election and needed to pretend to be a Tea Party favorite again for a year I would expect him to throw his support behind him. Cankles has run into the Red line and the bitch line. I wouldn't be surprised if the WH was photoshopping her out of all official pictures with the Won already. I'm sure no one there is taking her calls.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 06:34 AM (S8vW1)

202 The Clintons lie.  Okay.

I wish a tenth of this effort was put into investigating the guy who claimed he was born in Kenya in his author bio (and most assuredly on his college application), who's walking around with a Connecticut Social Security number (who the fvck is Harrison J. Bounel?), who looks EXACTLY like the founder of Subud, and who has joked for several years in a row about his Muslim religion at the WHCD.

But all that -- the stuff that's affecting our lives right now, every day --- all that's off limits, and whomever raises these issues is dismissed by left AND right as a tinfoil crackpot.

Where's the Post on this?  Hell, where's Breitbart or NRO?

At least now we know that the Clintons are grifters or something.

Posted by: Kate58 at April 30, 2015 06:34 AM (MvtKs)

203 194 No, we're dextrous!
Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:31 AM (oKE6c)

What does sugar have to do with this discussion?

Posted by: Insomniac at April 30, 2015 11:32 AM (2Ojst)




We're on the levulose diet.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:34 AM (oKE6c)

204 Remember, these same folks spent YEARS chasing Scott Walker's supporters around with SWAT teams for the crime of being Republican, despite finding nothing and being ordered to shut down twice . This is why secession is now in play. Sharing a country with a delusional, corrupt party is one thing. Sharing a country with a delusion, corrupt party that also believes the law exists only as a cudgel to attack its enemies is simply not feasible. This is still the party that burned down black Tulsa when blacks were Republican. They believe in nothing but their own power.

Posted by: TallDave at April 30, 2015 06:35 AM (74ZYB)

205 I was in a research group of 16 that had 12 southpaws.
Posted by: Jay Guevara


Also interesting, there appears to be a strong probability for female children among the highly educated.  At one point, my division of scientists was running 60-40 at least.

Posted by: pep at April 30, 2015 06:35 AM (GMG6W)

206 Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:33 AM (oKE6c) That's not even an argument from ignorance, they know they're being political hacks by saying "BUSH SPENT A TRILLION DOLLARS ON UNDECLARED WARS". Because when I say "yeah? Well Obama spent a trillion dollars in his first year in office ALONE on "roads and bridges" and has spent a lot more since then on other bullshit" They have no come back.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:35 AM (AkOaV)

207 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us. John Browning (PBUH) clearly hated you guys.

Posted by: toby928(C) at April 30, 2015 06:35 AM (evdj2)

208
My youngest daughter is left handed and refuses to believe it.  Writes Righty because thats the way its done I guess, but picks everything up and throws with the left until you point it out. 

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 30, 2015 06:36 AM (ODxAs)

209 Clean up aisle 72. Don't know who this Noah Rothman character is but he appears to have read the thread before commenting. Break out the banhammer. We don't need 'that kind' littering the comments.

Posted by: Emotional Protestor [/i] at April 30, 2015 06:36 AM (xQX/f)

210 Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 11:34 AM (S8vW1) Yeah. Well, the media calls him an independent, he calls himself a democratic socialist. So... Also, Obamas voting record was to the left of Sanders (as far a handful of other Dems) for what its worth. Always found that funny. "Oh, so youre to the left of the socialist in the Senate, eh?"

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:37 AM (AkOaV)

211 208 We southpaws are 10% of the population and you people have designed most of the world to kill us.

John Browning (PBUH) clearly hated you guys.

Posted by: toby928(C) at April 30, 2015 11:35 AM (evdj2)



Also, lefties and bolt-action rifles ... no.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:38 AM (oKE6c)

212 Yesterday, some link posted about all these little subsidiary foundations they set up in a bunch of countries all over the world. The Toons have had this octupus set up since at least 2010. Its just sick. We need a very good forensic accountant to comb thru this mess and tie all of this stuff together. I think that book is just the tip of the iceburg. And I can see a second book coming out to follow up on all the new stuff that has been uncovered. "Billions and billions of dollars!"........channeling Carl Sagen.

Posted by: Buckeye Katie at April 30, 2015 06:38 AM (1M/xn)

213 Well, I guess discussing lefties flows easily from discussing the Clintons.

Posted by: joncelli, Boned like You at April 30, 2015 06:38 AM (RD7QR)

214 That'll do it. Mine is idiots blathering about how Bush! spent so much money, never realizing that he is given a budget by Congress, Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:33 AM (oKE6c) Wait, what? Huh. Who knew you needed a budget in order for the Feds to spend money! The More You Know! (trademark thingy)

Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at April 30, 2015 06:38 AM (mf5HN)

215 I'm ready to go and I'll make the rest of America look just like Baltimore.   

Posted by: Martin O'Malley at April 30, 2015 06:39 AM (OD2ni)

216 You gotta admit, they're pretty good at doing all this. I bet the Mob would pay good money for use of these techniques! Set up a non-profit.. Sell influence to foreigners who "donate" to your trumped up "charity". Spend most of those donations on "overhead" building a political organization with thousands of operatives and fund your lavish lifestyle which includes world travel to foreign countries where you finagle more "donations". And, in special cases where some foreign businessman wants a really huge favor, Billy boy makes a half-million dollar speech that gets deposited directly into Bill and Hill's bank account. I tells ya.. they're criminal geniuses! And as an aside, I must say this is all the fault of the Tea Party.. because if the IRS had not been so busy harassing those Tea Party groups applying for tax-free statuses, I am quite sure the IRS would have caught this Clinton scam. Amiright? or, amiright?

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 30, 2015 06:39 AM (so+oy)

217 Maybe the electorate wouldn't be so uninformed if they still taught Civics in schools. Now get off my lawn.

Posted by: Citizen X at April 30, 2015 06:39 AM (7ObY1)

218 Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at April 30, 2015 11:38 AM (mf5HN) Oh, if only that were true. We seemed to have no trouble spending money without a budget for years. Plus that whole unauthorized several billion dollars Obamas treasury department spend on OCare without asking /notifying Congress.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:39 AM (AkOaV)

219 Friendsh, aw, fuck it.

Posted by: Juan McCain at April 30, 2015 06:40 AM (8W5zZ)

220 Blame Canada! -Sheila Brovloski

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at April 30, 2015 06:40 AM (4Ax43)

221 Hillary!2016? Frankly, I find Jeantel!2016 far less frightening.

Posted by: jwpaine at April 30, 2015 06:40 AM (0bXhD)

222 Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 30, 2015 11:39 AM (so+oy) I especially like the "funnel the money through our canadian subsidiary" part. I mean, if you are or I tried that it would be called money laundering. but for a politician, eh, you know how these things are.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:40 AM (AkOaV)

223 Posted by: Kate58 -------- Props for the obscure reference to Subud.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 06:41 AM (S8vW1)

224 I bet the IRS has already opened an investigation on the 501.3C status of this clearly corrupt and partisan non-profit. Or maybe not.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:41 AM (g1DWB)

225 Can't believe you people jilted a perfectly good art thread for this shit. Feckless bastards.

Posted by: ScoggDog at April 30, 2015 06:42 AM (7faTs)

226 Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 11:41 AM (S8vW1) What does Sinbad have to do with this? Didn't he also have to avoid sniper fire with Hillary in Bosnia back in the '90s? He may have taken a round to the head, I haven't heard about / from him since then.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:42 AM (AkOaV)

227 Everyone knows  "the Left" doesn't exist! There's "the Right" and "Normal". Bernie Sanders is "Normal" like everyone but those evil Right Wingers.

Posted by: MSM, Hollywood, Anyone with a Megaphone at April 30, 2015 06:42 AM (fVOPU)

228 @217 Well said Jerry.

Posted by: Buckeye Katie at April 30, 2015 06:42 AM (1M/xn)

229

I am not surprised by the number of Southpaws self-declaring in here.

 

It is well established fact that we are smarter, more artistic, and better-looking than the 90%.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 06:42 AM (JtwS4)

230 Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:42 AM (JtwS4) Bunch of abnormal weirdos, if you ask me. But hey, whatever.

Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 06:43 AM (AkOaV)

231 Mrs. Clinton, what happened to that $6 billion that went missing under your watch as Secretary of State?

Posted by: Mythical GOP Questioner at April 30, 2015 06:43 AM (/+zDJ)

232

"Frankly, I find Jeantel!2016 far less frightening."

 

 

That's retarded, sir. 

Posted by: Rachel Jeanteel at April 30, 2015 06:43 AM (OD2ni)

233 Rest assured the media is doing this merely because they understand how damaged the Clintons are and must initiate the heave over-board before she becomes the pinata of Conservatives and even some folks who are waking up to the nonsense.

We must also remember these fools still wish to embed their radical policy just with somebody sans indefensible baggage.

 

Posted by: melodicmetal1 at April 30, 2015 06:43 AM (MV2jA)

234 >>It is well established fact that we are smarter, more artistic, and better-looking than the 90%. Barack Hussein Obama is left handed.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:43 AM (g1DWB)

235 Frankly, I find Jeantel!2016 far less frightening.

That's real retarded, sir.

Posted by: Blanco Basura at April 30, 2015 06:44 AM (YEelc)

236 TallDave @ 205, The use of SWAT, and home invasion searches was the line. It was crossed with nary a peep or protest from the liberals. I rage-stroked. Had to back off of my interest in "politics", because we are now at the point of "politics by other means" now. People who aren't waving one banner or the other just don't get how toxic things have become. And won't listen if they think you have an axe to grind (and who wouldn't when the apparatus of the state uses guns to squelch political speech and donations?) Very sad.

Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 30, 2015 06:44 AM (XmOA9)

237 Al Gore, being familiar with Clintonian methods, but not having Clintonian skill, gave the game away. "No controlling legal authority."

Posted by: AmishDude at April 30, 2015 06:44 AM (N7Udv)

238 Posted by: Mythical GOP Questioner at April 30, 2015 11:43 AM (/+zDJ) Well, funny you should ask that. It was there and then -- HEY, have you had the guac at chipotle? Oh. My. Gawd! Fricking Delicious! Huma suggested it. I was a little surprised they made me pay extra, but it was well worth the $150 or whatever it costs. Hehe, I have no idea what things cost since I haven't paid for or bought anything since the early '90s

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at April 30, 2015 06:45 AM (AkOaV)

239 "We southpaws are 10% of the population"


I suspect it is really closer to 1% - just another minority inflating their numbers to gain relevance. Interesting how gays claim to be 10% also.

Posted by: [/i] [/u] [/s] [/b] An Observation at April 30, 2015 06:45 AM (+KULC)

240 Rafael Nadal is right handed but plays tennis left handed and that seems to be working out okay for him. Same for Phil Mickelson. I see we have comment drift early this morning.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:45 AM (0HooB)

241

Barack Hussein Obama is left handed.

 

I bet he's only half left-handed.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 06:45 AM (JtwS4)

242 Yeah. Well, the media calls him an independent, he calls himself a democratic socialist. Posted by: mynewhandle ----- Exactly my point. Remember how Barry was touted by the MSM as a "Moderate" and "Center of the Roader" when he had already run as an actual socialist for State Rep? Those preliminary emailed talking points aren't going to insert themselves into the media without operatives pushing them.

Posted by: Daybrother at April 30, 2015 06:46 AM (JU9Po)

243 @232 Myth: Dollars to donuts there was a subsidiary set up in Africa to funnel all that money thru. Hence the visit by Slick Willie this weekend.

Posted by: Buckeye Katie at April 30, 2015 06:47 AM (1M/xn)

244 I chooze Heavy Breff Man as my runing maite.

Posted by: Raechel Jeantel at April 30, 2015 06:47 AM (7ObY1)

245 Yeah. Well, the media calls him an independent, he calls himself a democratic socialist.


Posted by: mynewhandle at April 30, 2015 11:37 AM (AkOaV)


"Democratic socialist" = Marxist who wants to impose Marxism through the ballot box, as opposed to a revolutionary Marxist.


It's kind of like saying "I crepitated" instead of "I farted."

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:48 AM (oKE6c)

246 Yeah. Well, the media calls him an independent, he calls himself a democratic socialist. Just like another famous European political figure from the 1930's?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:48 AM (0HooB)

247

Remember how Barry was touted by the MSM as a "Moderate" and "Center of the Roader" when he had already run as an actual socialist for State Rep?

 

I believe he ran and won as a Socialist for Mayor of Brattleboro.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 06:49 AM (JtwS4)

248 Barack Hussein Obama is left handed.

I bet he's only half left-handed.

Posted by: Bandersnatch at April 30, 2015 11:45 AM (JtwS4)



I bet he's ambidextrous: gives reach-arounds with either hand.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:49 AM (oKE6c)

249 Maybe the electorate wouldn't be so uninformed if they still taught Civics in schools. The new definition of civics is social justice.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at April 30, 2015 06:49 AM (W5DcG)

250 I buy into Andrew Breitbart's model of the NYT and Globe being part of the Democrat-Industrial complex. Both rags have covered up six years of scandals and/or incompetence in the White House, and only use turn their weapons against those they deem a setback for progressive ideology. This is an orchestrated signal for others MSM outlets to pile on quickly so some serious alternatives can be quickly funded and vetted.

Posted by: Levin at April 30, 2015 06:50 AM (6pgRO)

251
This is kinda funny:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qw1AeOlw4I

amazing that some of these people are serious in their agreement.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 30, 2015 06:50 AM (ODxAs)

252 Everyone knows "the Left" doesn't exist! There's "the Right-wing Extreeeeeeeeemists" and "Normal".

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at April 30, 2015 06:50 AM (/kI1Q)

253 238 Al Gore, being familiar with Clintonian methods, but not having Clintonian skill, gave the game away.

"No controlling legal authority."

Posted by: AmishDude at April 30, 2015 11:44 AM (N7Udv)

------------


Didn't Al Gore flunk out of law school? I think we're beginning to see why.

Posted by: Jay Guevara[/i][/b][/s][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:50 AM (oKE6c)

254 I am not impressed.

Posted by: Coalition of the Oppressed at April 30, 2015 06:52 AM (HEo6y)

255 That flunkie Gore managed to make hundreds of millions of dollars since leaving office. Corrupt, or brilliant? Discuss. Bah, nevermind.

Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 30, 2015 06:52 AM (XmOA9)

256 They all do it, but she cares about me.

Posted by: Coalition of the Oppressed at April 30, 2015 06:53 AM (HEo6y)

257 I'd just like to add that it's high time we let these criminals know that their criminal behavior will no longer be tolerated, and that, thank God, Eric Holder is out at Justice and we now have a new no-nonsense AG who will get to the bottom of this! The Lynch Mob rides again! Barry's Lynch Mob FTW!

Posted by: Fritz at April 30, 2015 06:53 AM (ty633)

258 Heh, people still think the GOPe is just paralyzed by fear of the MFM. Even Rush buys this. We will not win until we come to grips with the segment of the GOPe that wants to be the minority token opposition party so they can just feed at the trough and figure out how to thwart both them and the power loving Dems.

Posted by: PaleRider at April 30, 2015 06:55 AM (7w/kf)

259 Does this mean that there is a nation whose laws the Clintons will try to obey?

Posted by: buzzsaw90 at April 30, 2015 06:56 AM (/eTPT)

260 This is kinda funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qw1AeOlw4I amazing that some of these people are serious in their agreement. Sheesh. Talk about young skulls full of mush...

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 30, 2015 06:57 AM (0HooB)

261 Late to the party, but in case no one mentioned it:

Finally, someone in the media is asking why this isn't an Obama scandal, too.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/  "Excuse me, this is an Obama scandal" post.

I doubt this will be mentioned much elsewhere in the press, because Obama doesn't have any scandals, he just bobs along with the tide and is always shocked, shocked to discover that someone in his own admin has done something bad (and implied, w/out his knowledge or approval).

Posted by: Lizzy[/i] at April 30, 2015 06:58 AM (2TN4k)

262 So, I wonder when we start hearing the names of the actual people employed by the Clinton Foundation.

Because, near as I can tell, mission #1 was to fundraise and #2 was to retain the top political talent (those not already working for Obama) on a steady paycheck.

But, there is also going to be some interesting overlap--people who were being paid by the Clintons AND getting a government check.

Posted by: RoyalOil at April 30, 2015 06:58 AM (ZvKdv)

263 Just so you know ... Art Thread says she'd rather CLOSE than have any of you back. She said she gave you the best 280 posts of her life, and all you did in return was leave her for some fat drunk slut. She says hosting you was like eating a dirt sandwich. Her words. Not mine.

Posted by: ScoggDog at April 30, 2015 06:58 AM (7faTs)

264 >>But, there is also going to be some interesting overlap--people who were being paid by the Clintons AND getting a government check. We already know Huma was.

Posted by: JackStraw at April 30, 2015 06:59 AM (g1DWB)

265 Posted by: PaleRider at April 30, 2015 11:55 AM (7w/kf) Easy-Peasy. With-hold sex. Er, I mean support. They can't win without us. Period, end of story. But until it happens, nobody will believe it'll happen. And the next election is always the most important election of our lifetimes, so we can't toss away our vote with so much at stake! And so, like the abused wife, we lay down and think of something pleasant. It'll be different this time. Really.

Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 30, 2015 06:59 AM (XmOA9)

266 Art thread turned into a cake thread. It was time to end it.

Posted by: Soothsayer says It's time to heal at April 30, 2015 06:59 AM (1BhJn)

267 She said she gave you the best 280 posts of her life, and all you did in return was leave her for some fat drunk slut. Yeah well, spot the key word in that sentence.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 30, 2015 07:00 AM (659DL)

268 >>So, I wonder when we start hearing the names of the actual people employed by the Clinton Foundation.


Same people who worked for the Clinton WH - Cheryl Mills, Donna Shalala, Huma Abedin, etc.  Mentioned this before, but Hillary brought 75+ of her own people to State with her - something that no other SoS has done (the may bring a few people, nothing like this).

The have people who work for them wherever they go - like Huma Abedin, who has worked for Hillary since interning for her at the WH in 1996. It is truly CLINTON, INC.

Posted by: Lizzy[/i] at April 30, 2015 07:02 AM (2TN4k)

269 "Baltimore is over?" spoken in a voice of shock and surprise. "Baltimore is OVER!" spoken in a voice of command authority.

Posted by: Kayle Hauftoon at April 30, 2015 07:02 AM (0vSF5)

270 Question: If you were going to set up a foundation to hide foreign influence, enable an affluent lifestyle, and have very little in the way of auditable charity projects... What would you have done differently?

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 30, 2015 07:03 AM (659DL)

271

Just don't divide by zero and we'll be ok.

---

But's that's my whole career

Posted by: Barack Obama at April 30, 2015 07:05 AM (/eTPT)

272 Her words. Not mine. Posted by: ScoggDog at April 30, 2015 11:58 AM (7faTs) For a minute there, I thought you were beating that joke to death, and then you redeeemed yourself. You win the Interweb tday!

Posted by: jwpaine at April 30, 2015 07:08 AM (0bXhD)

273

Remember when Hillary Clinton said she wanted to get unaccountable money out of politics?

--

 

and into her bank account

Posted by: buzzsaw90 at April 30, 2015 07:12 AM (/eTPT)

274 When a guy gives to an org that supports traditional marriage he loses his job...I think donors to charities SHOULD be confidential. I also think charities out to be, I dunno....let's call it "charitable." Not "flies me around the world in luxury"-able and not "employs my campaign war team"-able.

Posted by: major major major major at April 30, 2015 11:02 AM (QlI33)



No, a thousand times no. Make it anonymous, and you enable this sort of shit, and more. You really want to reform charities? End the tax deduction for charitable donations. You really think all the donors to the Clinton Scamnation would have done so with after-tax dollars?



If a particular charitable cause means something to you, or to me, we will give to it without expectation of a tax credit.

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at April 30, 2015 07:13 AM (+/fKe)

275

I'm thinking Lizzy Warren.

She makes Hillary! look almost Moderate...

---

and sexy

Posted by: Stevie Wonder at April 30, 2015 07:18 AM (/eTPT)

276 1) This is crazy.
2) Democraps don't seem to give a shit about legal immigrants.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at April 30, 2015 11:11 AM (/kI1Q)



Funny, none of them seemed to have made any effort at self-defense. Where were the rooftop Koreans?

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at April 30, 2015 07:19 AM (+/fKe)

277 You're welcome, Ace!

Posted by: Dirty, Randy Noah at April 30, 2015 07:24 AM (jjaLl)

278

Obama throws a baseball like he's using the wrong hand, so I don't consider him apure southpaw.

---

it says right handed on his true birth certificate

Posted by: donald trump at April 30, 2015 07:24 AM (/eTPT)

279 Obama throws a baseball like he's using the wrong hand, so I don't consider him apure southpaw.

Posted by: brevity at April 30, 2015 11:30 AM (jmN7w)



Of course it's the wrong hand. Consider what it's attached to.

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at April 30, 2015 07:28 AM (+/fKe)

280 It's kind of like saying "I crepitated" instead of "I farted."

Posted by: Jay Guevara at April 30, 2015 11:48 AM (oKE6c)


That reminds me... back in the 70's my father had a cassette tape called "the Crepitation Contest", a mock-serious spoof of a sports event.... it was HILARIOUS! I still remember the end, the Champ was going for the win with a series of "fluffers" or something, when you a loud, wet one...the crowd is silent....and the announcer yells "OOOOH! HE SHIT!!!!"

He was disqualified.


I laughed.

Posted by: Dirty Randy at April 30, 2015 07:37 AM (jjaLl)

281 Bill and Hillary are CROOKS

Posted by: #OccupyAnthonyWeinersShorts at April 30, 2015 07:41 AM (e8kgV)

Hide Comments | Add Comment




What colour is a green orange?




199kb generated in CPU 0.21, elapsed 1.361 seconds.
64 queries taking 1.2013 seconds, 519 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.