April 26, 2006
— Ace ...has been ably put together by Ace Pilots.
Flopping Aces notes that chart looks like a chart the MSM, rather than bloggers, published. A chart showing the connections between the Swift-Boaters and Republicans, for example.
Funny how they make the latter, and are single-mindedly uninterested in making the former.
Flopping Aces has all sorts of cool links and quotes -- really, he's done a man's job in scouring the blogosphere and opinion columnists and news stories -- and I recommend his post heartily.
I'll steal a little bit. Remember, this is a nonpartisan woman. Which makes me wonder-- why does the DNC want to start a legal defense fund for her?
Perhaps thats why the Howard Dean and others at the Democrat National Committee are looking to some of their donors to set up a legal defense fund for McCarthy.
If Scooter Libby can have a legal defense fund and website, then McCarthy should have one too, says a DNC staffer. The DNC wouldnt set it up, wed have some of our donors do it on the outside. There are plenty of consultants willing to help on this one, we think.
It's funny. Partisanship only exists on the right. We hear endlessly about the ideologues on the right -- the "neocon cabal" who have hijacked foreign policy -- but the media cannot even whisper the possiblity of a liberal clacque in the CIA and security apparatus.
Bill Clinton at the top of one side?
You people DO know he's been out of office for...oh, about 6 years???
And where's the Leaker In Chief??
Talk about a s-t-r-e-t-c-h...get used to it...Bush is going to be IMPEACHED.
Posted by: Mike at April 26, 2006 12:55 PM (leJWb)
Good. Get them all and make them pay. Republican, Democrat, Silly Party, I don't care.
I'd give good odds that its mostly on the left, though. Rush Limbaugh had a good article (well, transcript of a segment of his show) giving the connections yesterday. It's probably been rolled off into the pay side of his site by now.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 26, 2006 12:58 PM (1Vbso)
You can almost feel the desperation in their idiot posts. It's almost comical.
Posted by: Rocketeer at April 26, 2006 01:03 PM (GFaLW)
Thats a really bad job of equivalence and conflating.
McCarthy achieved relatively high rank during Clinton's (you have to admit he is really a famous leaker, although the substance was different) administration. The group of people who were introduced into gov't service during that period left behind some refuse when he left the building.
That refuse is attempting to discredit the current administration without regard to the real or potential cost of those actions to the country.
And as far as the President is concerned, as long as he provides some oversight, he can leak any and all information he chooses. I have yet to be convinced that the required oversight was not provided.
Finally, with regard to impeachment:
Please define the crime, and provide the proof. You seem to take this as a given, and it is reasonable to assume that there must be a great deal of evidence to support your position. Please review that information, somewhere else, such as DU, with other like-minded people.
Posted by: Scott at April 26, 2006 01:10 PM (QM6Yk)
I'm tired of emailing him every day demanding that he resign.
Posted by: Unruly Human at April 26, 2006 01:11 PM (AYAKP)
Obviously all non-partisan patriots. McCarthyism! Or something.
Posted by: moonbat at April 26, 2006 01:18 PM (biNPb)
Bringing Clinton into this is absurd.
The fact that she worked in his adminstration means...what...that she leans to the left politically?
That she's probably a Democrat?
And that she contributed to Democrats?
Instead of paying attention to this "diversion" from our real problems...people in America should be more concerened with our President getting us into a war, based on trumped up evidence, cherry-picking only what he wanted to hear or know, getting 1,000's of our fellow Americans killed or wounded...and being buried in Iraq for who know how fucking long...with more deaths every day.
Leaking information to the press has been around forever...and it's not going away...just ask the Leaker In Chief...he should know.
Posted by: Mike at April 26, 2006 01:24 PM (leJWb)
Rocketeer - you can definately feel the desperation from the left with this one. If Macsmind and In From The Cold are right, McCarthy is a little fish with some biggies about to get hooked.
Posted by: Curt at April 26, 2006 01:26 PM (oxpNJ)
Now...if you'll excuse me...I'm going to go whack off to pictures of my dog and ogle men in thongs at the beach...
As for the Leaker in Chief...yeah, that's me...when I see a guy wearing a speedo...I just can't help myself...the little Mikey just ERUPTS
Posted by: Mike at April 26, 2006 01:28 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: Daisy at April 26, 2006 01:37 PM (oXHyU)
Posted by: sandy burger at April 26, 2006 01:46 PM (PQyeQ)
Posted by: Paul Zrimsek at April 26, 2006 01:48 PM (E3Bj/)
On troll etiquette, is it okay to talk about the trolls while *click*ing as long as you don't talk to the trolls?
Lost on the net
Posted by: lost-on-the-net at April 26, 2006 01:54 PM (PD1tk)
I took the pledge.
Posted by: toby928 at April 26, 2006 02:01 PM (PD1tk)
You can almost feel the desperation in their idiot posts. It's almost comical.
Oh my yes, they could taste congress in their control again and this is going to shake things up considerably. I suspect heads are going to start exploding on campuses across America, scanners-style.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 26, 2006 02:16 PM (1Vbso)
No, not that one. The other one.
Posted by: S. Weasel at April 26, 2006 02:23 PM (1HKrT)
If you actually think this has anything to do with the upcoming elections...or helping lift little Bushie's 32% approval rating...you're even dumber than the rest of the idiots on this blog.
The Democrats/liberals see this woman as a hero, not some kind of pariah...like YOUR Leaker In Chief is becoming more and more of...as each and every day of this loser's term circles the bowl.
The man is setting new records every day for being inept, corrupt and just downright untrustworthy.
Posted by: Mike at April 26, 2006 03:05 PM (leJWb)
Posted by: M ike Meyer at April 26, 2006 03:09 PM (Q5VcU)
Here's the IMDB page. I think it lists that guy's name. (And that other guy, too.)
Posted by: sandy burger at April 26, 2006 03:12 PM (PQyeQ)
Posted by: toby928 at April 26, 2006 03:22 PM (PD1tk)
and the reason Clinton's name keeps coming up is because the world did not become an evil place on January 18, 2001. it was bad long before then. by your logic, as soon as mid-January 2009, Bush will be exonerated, simply by not being in office any more.
might wanna get that plank out of your eye before telling us that we have splinters in ours.
Posted by: MacStansbury at April 26, 2006 03:35 PM (CNsdg)
The Flight93 ad was interesting. Got to make time to go.
Posted by: toby928 at April 26, 2006 03:39 PM (PD1tk)
[Click] Sorry. Light just right on that one.
Posted by: Random Japanese Tourist at April 26, 2006 03:50 PM (+DMjG)
Thanks for keeping us updated, Ace! I look forward to what the upcoming days will bring.
Posted by: Muslihoon at April 26, 2006 03:50 PM (Q8UK2)
Posted by: Slublog at April 26, 2006 03:52 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: adolfo velasquez at April 26, 2006 03:54 PM (9+vvz)
Well, not that uncomfortable. Dude has a dick the size of a crayon.
Posted by: Mike's Dog at April 26, 2006 04:03 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: Muslihoon at April 26, 2006 04:06 PM (Q8UK2)
Again please, this is my good side.
Posted by: toby928 at April 26, 2006 04:10 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Birkel at April 26, 2006 04:31 PM (DSGrX)
*Mike is not really even a troll - he's much more like a spammer trying to sell something - he says the same thing over and over again, with the only variation being in the number of '...............s' and CAPS LOCKED he uses.
Posted by: max at April 26, 2006 04:31 PM (ut95J)
Posted by: Old Coot at April 26, 2006 04:32 PM (K13iK)
Are Little Dick Durbin and Rockafeller both up for election this year?
Posted by: Iblis at April 26, 2006 04:38 PM (78+TM)
Oh, wait. What was that? Different Ty Cobb?
Dave at Garfield Ridge
Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge at April 26, 2006 04:56 PM (kc9zT)
Their girlish shrieks of outrage delight my very soul. I shall imbibe each tantrum like a fine wine, raising my glass to GWB to toast the continuing defeat of the craven and hate-filled left as they spin, spin SPIN like cheap dimestore tops in increasingly desperate circles of distraction from the things that intelligent, thinking people have known all along.
Posted by: The Warden at April 26, 2006 05:11 PM (rZ5uY)
We've got Schwarzenegger.......They've got Benedict.
Posted by: at April 26, 2006 05:11 PM (mRNmZ)
Posted by: BFD at April 26, 2006 05:13 PM (mRNmZ)
So if the election were going to be held just among democrats/liberals, you'd be all set. But everyone else gets to vote, too. I know, that sucks, but what can you do?
It's pretty obvious how Republicans/conservatives are going to take this.
So, to tell whether it'll affect the election or not, we'll have to see how Independents/neuters*/apoliticals see it.
THE SPIN IS ON.
(* Nixon's term, not mine. See "The Making of the President: 1968" re the selection of Agnew as VP)
Posted by: Knemon at April 26, 2006 07:56 PM (a3KVd)
REPUBLICRATS, expensive soapopera, still a hoot.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 26, 2006 08:02 PM (GRhRE)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 26, 2006 11:29 PM (XbJeu)
Maybe the (alleged) leaking was done via telecommute?
Posted by: Knemon at April 27, 2006 03:50 AM (a3KVd)
I'm sort of hoping the Donks will agree to that Food Stamps Brothel for Cute Welfare Moms bill that's been languishing in committee. It could be Rocky will have to get behind this--he'd sell his own mom to stay in the club you know.
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 27, 2006 04:09 AM (uSomN)
Congress has a lot of power over DC. The power of the purse. When Congress doesn't like something that the DC council and mayor are proposing, the money gets switched off.
Posted by: dav od at April 27, 2006 04:16 AM (AM62A)
WASHINGTON — Despite the CIA's goal of cracking down on leaks of classified information, the government may forgo criminal charges against a senior agency officer fired last week for disclosing operational secrets, according to current and former intelligence and law enforcement officials.
The officials cited a number of obstacles to pursuing the case, including that the employee was fired in part over polygraph results that would not be admissible as evidence and that she was accused of leaking secrets the government would be reluctant to air in court.
The strength of the CIA's evidence against the fired employee, Mary O. McCarthy, also has come under scrutiny. McCarthy's attorney, Ty Cobb, said that contrary to the CIA's statement last week, she did not disclose classified information or confess to doing so to agency investigators.
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 06:26 AM (leJWb)
"Isn't it ironic. Don'tcha think?"
Posted by: truly gutless at April 27, 2006 06:37 AM (iDneH)
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 06:55 AM (rkK3q)
Here's something more to chew on...in addition to Bush's dick:
Bush Poll Numbers: 4/21-24/06
NBC/Wall Street Journal 36 57
CNN 4/21-23/06 32 60
FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 33 57
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 06:55 AM (leJWb)
Here's a word I'm sure you've heard your whole life: "chickenshit."
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 06:57 AM (leJWb)
Posted by: Gutless Weasel at April 27, 2006 07:01 AM (iDneH)
You're always spouting off about my posting things that "I didn't write"...as if you're producing volumes of interesting and factual information.
Well, if you can't refute what I've posted (whether from another source or not) just say so...don't get into this whiny bullshit about how I found it published elsewhere...because that's why people READ, asswipe.
And...let's read some something from YOU...something YOU'VE come up with on your very own...something relevant, factual and on point.
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 07:06 AM (leJWb)
Clinton’s strong disapproval never got above 37 percent in Post-ABC polls during his presidency.
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 07:13 AM (leJWb)
Posted by: Roy at April 27, 2006 07:17 AM (2XXia)
Say, how would you like to put some money on Bush getting impeached, hmm?
Posted by: Gutless Weasel at April 27, 2006 07:21 AM (iDneH)
A godamn constitutional scholar in our midst!!!! Who would have thought the sole source on Congressional power to punish leakers (judge, jury and executioner, apparently) is Article 1 section 8 clause 17.
Wow, to quote our resident Jamie Gum,that's the du......
ok, I won't go that far.
By the way, Jamie Gum, you sound particularly desperate today.
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 07:22 AM (K0x/A)
Okay, with that out of the way let's talk real serious-like about this impeachment thingy. I undestand it gives you an erotic thrill and all but before you climax I have two words for you that might cause an embarassing deflation of your turgid member:
Posted by: kelly at April 27, 2006 07:22 AM (AISkQ)
How is that 22% approval rating for Congressional Democrats feeling. I think we are going to IMPEACH the democrats in congress!!!!!
you scaggly jamie gum sounding, boring bitch.
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 07:30 AM (K0x/A)
Not to mention that pesky perjury, subornation of perjury, and obstruction of justice.
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at April 27, 2006 07:35 AM (iDneH)
Posted by: nikkolai at April 27, 2006 07:42 AM (70wcC)
But he still has 2 1/2 years to continue sticking in America's ass. Just think of the damage we can expect...
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 08:10 AM (leJWb)
Yeah, those "Clinton Days" were really the pits.
22 million new jobs (and good ones, too)
no illegal invasions
no illegal wiretapping
no "leakers in chief" handing out classified info, etc, etc...
We'll see how "history" compares little Georgie's reign of ineptitude to Clinton's handling of our country.
As for "kicking the can"...I remember something about a flat our warning from Osama being waved in our fearless leader's face...and being ignored entirely.
And...who can forget the little guy sitting there in that classroom...with that "deer frozen in the headlighs" look on his face...after our nation had been attacked...FOR SEVEN FUCKING MINUTES??
Clinton will be remembered as great President...Bush as the worst ever.
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 08:18 AM (leJWb)
I'll make you a deal. Post a pic of your wife and yourself and I'll post one of mine and myself. I want to see what a miserable little pussy you are and how ugly that hag is you're married to. I'm sure it will give us all a good laugh.
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 08:18 AM (rkK3q)
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 08:20 AM (rkK3q)
Posted by: Anon E. Mouse at April 27, 2006 08:24 AM (iDneH)
Posted by: nikkolai at April 27, 2006 08:24 AM (70wcC)
Speaking of Al Qaida, where's OSAMA? I wonder how he's doing today, probably broke out the chase lounge and is kicking back out in front of the cave, catching some rays. Too bad he killed all those people (AMERICANS) AND GOT AWAY WITHOUT A SCRATCH, AIN'T IT?
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 27, 2006 08:26 AM (tN00U)
Thanks, Mary, I needed that.
Posted by: Gutless Weasel at April 27, 2006 08:26 AM (iDneH)
Posted by: nikkolai at April 27, 2006 08:30 AM (70wcC)
Posted by: nikkolai at April 27, 2006 08:43 AM (70wcC)
Where's that picture, you faggoty little bitch? Put your money where your mouth is, chickenshit. Let's see it - you and the revolting She-Pig you claim as your wife.
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 08:59 AM (rkK3q)
Except for the damage done to the country by ignoring Al Qaeda, the illegal immigration mess, the nuclearization of China and North Korea, the institution of rendition, he will get some props for continuing Reagan's legacy of welfare reform. Oh, and he also got impeached.
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 09:02 AM (K0x/A)
Why the quotes on history? Why? WHY??? You shouldn't be in pomo sneering mode - you actually do want posterity to remember it, right?
Mike Meyer - yeh, that does suck. On the other hand, Osama's not a criminal, not some serial killer we've failed to "apprehend," he's the head of a stateless army. As such, have we put his strategic wang on the chopper or not?
He has less freedom of movement/big open-air camps/muthas with kalishnakovs than before.
It ain't perfect. He hasn't yet hit us here again.
Between the perfect and the terrible lies ... the Shadow.
Posted by: Knemon at April 27, 2006 09:06 AM (a3KVd)
That his administration was inconsequential except for the problems they ignored?
But everyone knows that, thats why he never got a majority. And why he lost Congress. And why he continues to fly around the world trying to establish whatever it is he thinks he can to create his legacy.
I don't even know why you bring this up except some troll is sitting in the corner flinging doo doo everywhere.
Besides, I heard that all those jobs the Clinton created were really low paying jobs. You know, the rich just got richer while the poor got poorer in the 90's. A real decade of greed.
Posted by: moeindc88 at April 27, 2006 09:06 AM (K0x/A)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 09:12 AM (K0x/A)
Knowing what we now know about Bush and his people completely ignoring an in-your-face warning directly from Osama Bin Laden, along with the FBI/CIA fuck-ups leading up to 9/11...it really takes a real moron to say this:
"That his administration was inconsequential except for the problems they ignored?"
You can go back to many Presidents and see things they either didn't do, ignored or fucked up (Reagan and Irangate & the contras/Bush not taking out Saddam/Carter and Iran/Nixon/Watergate, etc.), but you're going to have a tough time matching the Bush administration's ineptitude regarding 9/11, the aftermath in Iraq and Katrina...just to name a few.
Clinton will be remembered as a great President...Bush as an abject failure.
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 09:26 AM (leJWb)
Posted by: John Nance Garner at April 27, 2006 09:28 AM (R8+nJ)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 09:28 AM (K0x/A)
I have yet to develop a nuianced view of anythign that I spew?!?!?! That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard...you need to get your head out of your ass...first of all, Bush blew up the levees thereby causing NO to flood...a good president would have given a speech that would have made the water leave the city immediatly....the speech would also have gone back in time to make the mayor properly evacuate his city.....also ensure that the levee he blewed up was properly built!!!>!>!
Also, Bush had warning that 911 was going to happened...he was paid by the Saudis to do it afterall....I can't see how anyone,excpet for Clinton, could have ignored THAT warning sign...
You need to properly be objective and not elevate your arguments to mere worship of one person...except for Clinton...
Posted by: Mike ver. 2.5 auto-trollbot at April 27, 2006 09:32 AM (K0x/A)
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 09:36 AM (8WTw1)
Posted by: Mike ver. 2.312a auto-trollbot at April 27, 2006 09:41 AM (K0x/A)
No wonder he comes here and calls real men "chickenshit." It must enrage him to know that others actually live the happy life he tries so hard to convince others that he has obtained.
Ashamed of his own wife. Afraid to leave the comfort of anonymity and show his wretched face.
A miserable coward filled with self loathing and impotent rage.
Posted by: The Warden at April 27, 2006 10:03 AM (8WTw1)
I can tell you why that is. Clinton knew it was all a sham. He knew the economy was tanking. He knew that, if Gore was President and everything went south, he (Clinton) would be to blame. Gore would be an extension of Clinton's administration. If you will recall, one of the mysteries among political pundits was why Clinton did virtually no campaigning for Gore. It wasn't until the very last minute that he poked his head out and campaigned even if it was half-heartedly.
People tried to spin it as Clinton didn't want to taint Gore with his problems, but that doesn't fly. During and after his impeachment, his approval ratings were through the roof. Gore would have beneiftted from it. Clinton knew that a word from him would get Gore elected. The fabled "Clinton Economy" would be exposed as a sham. The only hope was to get Bush elected and then pin the blame on him. Most Americans don't understand enough about the economy to understand that it doesn't just stop on a dime. A recession is a thing that builds over time.
It's th same with the accounting scandals. The Dems wanted everyone to believe that Enron, Worldcom, and Adelphia woke up on January 20, 2001 and said, "Well, we now have a Republican as President. Let's raid the coffers." The scams these men ran were hatched well before President Bush took office. It wouldn't matter who the Presidnet was, they were going to try and see what they could get away with.
Posted by: Steve L. at April 27, 2006 10:17 AM (YIFeG)
And yet I don't have the BDS.
It is possible. Let's try to remember that ... even when faced with such powerful evidence to the contrary.
Posted by: Knemon at April 27, 2006 10:19 AM (a3KVd)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 27, 2006 10:41 AM (K0x/A)
Yeah, it sucks, what was I thinking? I mean, OSAMA was living in a nice swanky TENT before 911, now he's in a cave, If you believe the horseshit comming from this Administration. Yeah, he's probably only got maybe three or fore of his ole ladies to cook and clean, wash his ass, comb his hair. How great do the mighty fall. Sad, sad, sad.
Ease up, baby, you're looking mighty hard up there. Hey, break a twenty out of that fat wallet in your back pocket, go down town, find something on the corner, and get you some RELIEF, DIG.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 27, 2006 12:30 PM (vqi0m)
Noo, he had several large compounds where he was training an army. Those are gone now. Has he set up a similar shebang since? I mean, these camps were visible from the air. If they had gone and set up shop the next valley over, even someone as "braindead as the chimp" could probably figure out what to do.
I think you're thinking of him as a supervillian from a Bond movie with some skull-shaped island he can retreat to. He's either the guest of some state or other (the list of possibilities is pretty short), or he's hopping around within a state (pakistan, seems to be the best guess).
Let's say tomorrow Bush finds out for sure, gold-plated, that Iran, e.g., is setting Binny up at the Tehran Hilton. What then?
The more likely scenario: he's in pakistan. Do you want us to invade pakistan? (Oh sure, we've got a presence there now. But Pakistan's touchy about that as it is.
Let's say you're made the head of Project Catch Osama. What would you do other than what we're doing?
Just out of curiosity, what would you say to someone you were actually trying to convince, rather than scream/hiss at?
Posted by: Knemon at April 27, 2006 01:02 PM (a3KVd)
"Where's that picture, you faggoty little bitch? Put your money where your mouth is, chickenshit."
I don't believe you have a wife, even if you do post a picture of some poor woman you've stalked long enough to snap a shot of...especially considering your moniker.
And what is the story with that...it's very strange...to want to be called a "Warden."
Is there something about prison that turns you on...or are you posting from a cell and this is the deal you've struck so you can watch Fox News??
Some of you people are downright creepy.
Posted by: at April 27, 2006 01:05 PM (leJWb)
Posted by: Mike at April 27, 2006 01:05 PM (leJWb)
Let's bring Bill back to the Whitehouse if only to keep Mike from going completely insane!
Posted by: Sweetie at April 27, 2006 01:26 PM (CGv6G)
I would at least make AN EFFORT to capture OSAMA BEN LADEN and hopefully bring him back to New York, for TRIAL. I would, indeed place EVERY available resource at my disposal in this endevor. MY boots would be the FIRST on the ground (as my life is worth no more or less than ANY other AMERICAN) in the sincere hope that I myself would be the arresting agent. You can't catch him if you don't try.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 27, 2006 02:49 PM (Mco9Q)
Yeesh. You are aware that the most likely hiding spot for Bin Laden is in the Pakistani mountains, aren't you? And that our troops are not permitted to operate within Pakistan? So we have to rely on a very conflicted Pakistani government to pursue bin Laden? And in the meantime our only recourse is to crush Al Qaeda whereever else we find it? Which we're doing?
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 03:19 PM (nH1Ad)
I would imagine Pakistan is a whole other level of difficulty.
Posted by: lauraw at April 27, 2006 03:27 PM (o6H31)
Posted by: DAVE IN TEXAS at April 27, 2006 03:30 PM (mZKIF)
Especially when you have to keep one foot in Afghanistan while you look.
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 03:33 PM (nH1Ad)
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 27, 2006 03:36 PM (Mco9Q)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 27, 2006 03:38 PM (mZKIF)
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 03:39 PM (nH1Ad)
Posted by: Slublog at April 27, 2006 03:41 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: DAVE IN TEXAS at April 27, 2006 03:47 PM (mZKIF)
Posted by: Slublog at April 27, 2006 03:57 PM (aGpO3)
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 04:06 PM (nH1Ad)
We invaded Afganistan for that very same exact reason. My guess is he's NOT in Iran.
Posted by: Mike Meyer at April 27, 2006 04:09 PM (Mco9Q)
Posted by: Brick Tamland at April 27, 2006 04:24 PM (o6H31)
Posted by: LAURAW at April 27, 2006 04:26 PM (o6H31)
Posted by: Colonel Mustard at April 27, 2006 04:29 PM (DiHIL)
I thought I beat you to death in the parlor.
Posted by: Professor Plum at April 27, 2006 04:32 PM (aGpO3)
Because the Taliban refused to turn him over or curtail his activities. The Pakistani government is cooperating with us, at least overtly, in trying to find bin Laden and the Taliban. So the successful exercise of diplomacy has secured the cooperation of the Pakistani government, without necessitating war. Unfortunately Pakistan has little control over the mountainous region where bin Laden is most likely hiding.
My guess is he's NOT in Iran.
Probably not, and that is, of course, NOT why we're talking about military action against Iran.
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 04:33 PM (nH1Ad)
That plan sounds SMART and TOUGH.
Me likes it.
Posted by: Nancy Peloosi at April 27, 2006 04:35 PM (DiHIL)
Like we couldn't tell by all the unnecessary and/or incorrectly-used ellipses.
Posted by: Gutless Weasel at April 27, 2006 04:38 PM (hoofE)
Posted by: Colonel Mustard at April 27, 2006 04:39 PM (DiHIL)
Now stay down, motherfucker!
Posted by: Professor Plum at April 27, 2006 04:42 PM (aGpO3)
Knemon, that should you tip you off that you are probably wrong.
Clinton swept EVERYTHING under the rug.
Matters with North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, and Iraq were all swept under the RUG.
And his stupid "new economy" set our retirement funds back ten years.
Plus CLINTON did NOTHING about developing alternative energy sources.
Posted by: bartwing plover at April 27, 2006 04:51 PM (DiHIL)
Posted by: sandy burger at April 27, 2006 05:21 PM (FmfCF)
Unlike Saddam, who had many enemies who helped us out, Usama has lots of fans\ and there is stiff resistance in Pakistan to America's efforts, particularly in the northwest region thereof, where the Pakhtun, Taliban, and (likely) Usama et al. are. Let us not forget the major row that erupted when we "accidently" targeted militants in Pakistan.
Posted by: Muslihoon at April 27, 2006 05:43 PM (Q8UK2)
Posted by: geoff at April 27, 2006 05:48 PM (nH1Ad)
Posted by: Miss Scarlet at April 27, 2006 06:18 PM (56ssE)
Precisely the cowardly response I expected. Projecting your dishonesty upon others. How novel.
A gutless lying chickenshit is what you are. You can post your drivel here all day long, pal. It won't change facts.
How depressing it must be to be you - too scared to post a picuture of who you really are. Ashamed to post a picture of your own wife. It must be hard even rolling out of bed to face the day.
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 04:54 AM (8WTw1)
It'd be kinda hard to get some random woman to take pictures with me all over the world, don't you think?
Now that you're out of excuses, what will you say now coward?
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 05:00 AM (8WTw1)
What is this strange obsession with me?
And, as for what this supposed wife of yours looks like...why in the world would I give a fuck what somebody who even knows you looks like??
Oh, by the way...which prison are you in...and can we send cookies?
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 05:33 AM (leJWb)
Really? Why not provide the "correct" usage to which you refer?
*You idiots can't conjure up a single good argument for why Bush shouldn't be thrown out on on his ass...yet you have time to discuss the correct usage of ellipses??
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 05:38 AM (leJWb)
Since you apparently don't own a dictionary:
pl. elÂ·lipÂ·ses (-sz)
1. The omission of a word or phrase necessary for a complete syntactical construction but not necessary for understanding.
2. A mark or series of marks (... or * * *, for example) used in writing or printing to indicate an omission, especially of letters or words.
Oh, and by the way...if you've ever read a screenplay or teleplay or even a book (that would be a new experience)...you'll find them used just as I do...to create a conversational tone or flow to what is being written.
*As in: You, and the rest of the idiots on this blog...and I mean this...are fucking morons.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 05:45 AM (leJWb)
Mike: Of course I am
Projection (specifically, definition #
Posted by: wiserbud at April 28, 2006 05:52 AM (AQGeh)
What is your point, dickhead??
Are you actually saying you couldn't understand what I was saying...or is your masturbation session over...and you've run out of activities for the day?
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 06:03 AM (leJWb)
It's not an obsession, Mike. You're the one who talks endlessly about his perfect life with his dog and his wife and cocktails on the beach. Since you called me a chickenshit, I thought I'd give you the opportunity to show a little courage and provide proof of your lovely, happy life.
I thought it only fair that I do the same in return.
I knew you wouldn't take me up on it. You're a craven little coward who hides behind a keyboard telling lies and spewing insults you'd never dare speak to someone's face.
You don't have the guts to post a picture of yourself. because you don't have the balls to open yourself up to the ridicule that would follow.
Me, I'm not afraid to do these things because I'm not a gutless little worm like you, Mike. And I don't make up stories about who I am, where I live, and who I'm married to.
So spin it however you like. Everyone here, including yourself, knows who the real chickenshit is. No surprise at all coming from someone who has burned through at least 5 pseudonymns, embarrassing himself with every single one of them.
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 06:48 AM (8WTw1)
"It's not an obsession, Mike"
Then why all the inane posts, dickhead?
"You're the one who talks endlessly about his perfect life with his dog and his wife and cocktails on the beach"
Not true. I've signed off like that from time to time, but 99% of my posts have nothing whatsoever to do with my life. Basically...you're lying through what few teeth you have left.
"Since you called me a chickenshit, I thought I'd give you the opportunity to show a little courage and provide proof of your lovely, happy life."
What possible reason would I or anyone have for proving anything to some moron who calls himself a fucking "Warden??" (Is that cell closing in on you??)
"I thought it only fair that I do the same in return."
Do WHAT in return?? Tell people you have a wife. WOW.
"I knew you wouldn't take me up on it. You're a craven little coward who hides behind a keyboard telling lies and spewing insults you'd never dare speak to someone's face."
I have no idea what makes you think I'm a "coward," nor do I understand what "lies" you're referring to. As for dealing with people "face to face," I've had my share of confrontations...good and bad.
"You don't have the guts to post a picture of yourself. because you don't have the balls to open yourself up to the ridicule that would follow."
Why in the world would I want to see what YOU look like?
Why do YOU want to know what I look like? Are you looking for a date? I said I have a beautiful intelligent wife. Whether you want to believe it, is your perogative, but it matters little to me. (My dog is good looking, too...do you want a picture of him??)
"Me, I'm not afraid to do these things because I'm not a gutless little worm like you, Mike. And I don't make up stories about who I am, where I live, and who I'm married to."
I haven't made up any stories about where I live or who I am. I live near the beach, run a business, in the past, owned 3 saloons/bars/taverns/whatever the fuck you want to call them, do go to the beach damn near every day, drink cocktails, beers, shots, booze, whatever, have a dog and a wife...and, in general, am happy with my life.
"So spin it however you like. Everyone here, including yourself, knows who the real chickenshit is. No surprise at all coming from someone who has burned through at least 5 pseudonymns, embarrassing himself with every single one of them."
Nobody knows me or damn near anything about me...except that I'm a flaming liberal who thinks Bush is a fucking moron and should have never been elected President. And I don't feel "embarrassed" in the least. I say what I believe...whether you like it or not.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 09:26 AM (leJWb)
Not true. We also know that you have an IQ of around 80, that you post under several handles, and that you have a tenuous grasp at best on English rules of grammar.
Also that you're a chickenshit coward.
Don't let all that anger burn you up, Mike. Remember it's not Bush's fault you're so unhappy. It's God's.
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 09:34 AM (8WTw1)
1. My I.Q. is higher than 80
2. Grammar has never been my strong suit, but, based on the fact that YOU voted for Bush...who's really the one who needs an education?
3. You're back to that "coward" thing. Freud would say you're overcompensating for a lack of confidence in yourself. I would agree.
4. I'm not the least bit "angry."
5. I don't believe in God.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 09:59 AM (leJWb)
Says the guy who spend an entire day trying to get someone to "prove" an obviously ficticious quote from Thomas Jefferson.
2. Grammar has never been my strong suit, but, based on the fact that YOU voted for Bush...who's really the one
who needs an education?
Says the guy who thought slavery ended a century before it actually did.
3. You're back to that "coward" thing. Freud would say you're overcompensating for a lack of confidence in yourself. I would agree.
Says the guy who calls people chickenshits from behind the safety of his computer monitor and backs down from a challenge to reveal his identity.
4. I'm not the least bit "angry."
Says the guy who visits a conservative blog every day simply to hurl angry, humorless insults at the readers.
5. I don't believe in God.
No surprise there. I wouldn't either if I were you.
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 10:10 AM (8WTw1)
But not by much
Posted by: Miike at April 28, 2006 10:11 AM (2c7xL)
Actually, Freud's compensation theories dealt mainly with sexuality. Alfred Adler actually developed the theory that gives more weight to social forces.
Given your hyper-focus on sexuality, I'm not surprised you mentioned Freud.
Posted by: Slublog at April 28, 2006 10:22 AM (R8+nJ)
Posted by: Mike! at April 28, 2006 10:23 AM (8WTw1)
How would someone who voted for George W. Bush have any idea of what one's I.Q. is or isn't?? You people are really grasping at straws now. Getting a little nervous about your King being dethroned perhaps??
Spend some time with a shrink? It didn't help.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 10:33 AM (leJWb)
What a nasty, and telling, response.
Doesn't make you right about Freud and Adler, though.
Posted by: Slublog at April 28, 2006 10:39 AM (R8+nJ)
Get yourself your OWN life.
Mine's already taken.
As for visiting the site, I've made it perfectly clear on any number of occasions (not that you would remember) that I'm here for one reason, and one reason only: To aggravate the living shit out of the idiots who evidently live here day and night.
Your comment about God makes absolutely no sense at all...and, please, as I said above...get your own life, asshole.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 10:41 AM (leJWb)
I don't think we have a King anymore. You must be thinking of Canada.
You really are pretty stoopid. Duh!!!
Posted by: Miike at April 28, 2006 10:46 AM (2c7xL)
Man, I love assholes.
Or is that...I love man assholes?
Both, I guess.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 10:47 AM (R8+nJ)
Live your dreams, man.
Live. Your. Dreams.
Posted by: Slublog at April 28, 2006 10:49 AM (R8+nJ)
Yes. This is what happy, well-adjusted people do. How's that project going anyway? Must be very rewarding. More so, at least, than spending time with that wife of yours.
Anyway, let's talk more the abolishment of slavery in the late 1700's. I heard you're an expert on this stuff.
Posted by: The Warden at April 28, 2006 10:56 AM (8WTw1)
MSNBC’s Scarborough Country
‘As Many as a Half a Dozen’ Members of Congress May Be Involved in Prostitution Scandal
Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the FBI is “investigating whether two contractors implicated in the bribery of former Rep. Randall ‘Duke’ Cunningham supplied him with prostitutes and free use of a limousine and hotel suites.” The Journal also said the investigators are exploring “whether any other members of Congress” are involved.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 12:02 PM (leJWb)
The host of The Colbert Report proposed posts for Rush LImbaugh and Sean Hannity, and pushed his hero, Bill O'Reilly, for new Pentagon chief. Bush could send off Donald Rumsfeld with "the Medal of Freedom," he pointed out. The only problem with this is that O'Reilly would probably push for "an invasion of Vermont," he mused.
Colbert then suggested that Bush tab him to replace Michael Chertoff as head of Homeland Security. Chertoff, he complained, "has not done a thing" to control the bear population. A running "joke" on the show is Colbert's hatred of bears.
Earlier, Colbert had wondered, deadpan, if Snow would be able to handle the "radical" switch from Fox News to "apologist" for the president.
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 12:10 PM (leJWb)
Posted by: Mike at April 28, 2006 12:17 PM (leJWb)
Is anyone listening?
Posted by: Mike! at April 28, 2006 04:00 PM (rZ5uY)
You misspelled "homosexual."
Posted by: Gutless Weasel at April 28, 2006 04:17 PM (kR7mA)
Posted by: Random Japanese Tourist at April 28, 2006 10:48 PM (+DMjG)
First of all, your method of posting is racist and witless.
With that said, what's your problem asshole?
No fucking life?? Do you live with the Warden??
Just becase you don't get out of that little trailer very often...don't take it out on me...just becase I do have a life.
And when you see the Warden, tell him he can blow me.
Posted by: Mike at April 29, 2006 01:15 PM (leJWb)
Please forgive for challenging your world view. For you, a haiku by way of compensation:
Mike-san own saloon
Three at a time he has said
God weeps for his dog.
Posted by: Random Japanese Tourist at April 29, 2006 02:15 PM (+DMjG)
I come here day after day, looking at posts, hoping among hopes that Mike has not realized what a pathetic little twat he is and ran away. The highlight of my day is counting how many times this bitch quotes OTHER PEOPLES FUCKING WORK as if he thought of it and screams at anyone who challenges his posts to refute him. I can hardly hold back my laughter when he degenerates (not that he had to go far to begin with) into his trusty 5 year old repetitive "you stole my favorite crayon and i'm telling mommie" bullshit that involves a man's ass.
And then I stop laughing.
Suddenly, it hits me:
This guy is not fucking joking, he actually IS this way in real life.
what a douchebag.
P.S. Mike, just so you know, so you can make your bullshit story of how you own 3 bars more believable on the next conservative blog you infect, try leaving out "whatever you call them" out of the sentence starting with "I owned." Otherwise, you just look like an overweight acne scarred virgin who lives in his mother's basement in between shifts at the blockbuster and 7 11 trying desperately to get people who disagree with you to believe this fantasy of a life you hav....
Oh. That really is you. My bad.
I hear jenny craig works. Good luck with that.
Posted by: Veritas at April 29, 2006 06:04 PM (Tr2b6)
I think i will wright Jimmey C. and complain about the trade deficent and e-mail Regan's family about the loss of industry jobs. All though i'm not sure how an organization like Al Qaeda can be kicked down the road.
Posted by: jerry at May 02, 2006 06:17 PM (VhIWs)
Posted by: jpvg ftsgvbl at May 21, 2007 04:11 AM (beLWl)
Posted by: pravachol pravastatin at July 29, 2008 01:26 AM (yEhLK)
Posted by: lanoxin oral at July 30, 2008 12:10 PM (67v4q)
Posted by: generic soma and foricet at August 01, 2008 12:40 PM (H8hBk)
Posted by: book buy cheap guest online site soma at August 01, 2008 07:23 PM (EJWS5)
Posted by: soma watson 120 pills free shipping at August 02, 2008 05:42 AM (Ia2Au)
Posted by: soma generic name at August 02, 2008 07:37 AM (f/Ftt)
Posted by: viagra on line order at August 04, 2008 04:16 AM (bA8xN)
Posted by: purchase viagra on line at August 04, 2008 05:37 AM (IMxwr)
Posted by: saw palmetto berries at September 07, 2008 09:30 PM (7mvpr)
Posted by: usos del saw palmetto at September 07, 2008 10:08 PM (bXTQH)
Posted by: kamagra a pound per pill at September 08, 2008 09:43 AM (QBQyj)
Posted by: purchase propecia at September 08, 2008 10:52 PM (ptspx)
Posted by: avodart 0.5mg at September 11, 2008 01:59 PM (VjOxN)
Posted by: pfizer cardura chf lawsuit at September 11, 2008 02:55 PM (gO7zm)
, 5816, short skirt gallery
, fcvrqq, Pictures of very short skirts
, 235855, Discount transparent bikini
, %OOO, Cheapest gas powered scooters
Posted by: Richard at February 11, 2009 11:50 PM (RIX8F)
62 queries taking 1.1696 seconds, 399 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.