March 29, 2007
— Ace Ba-zing:
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) introduced the District of Columbia Personal Protection Act of 2007, a bill to restore Second Amendment rights in Washington, D.C.
The constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens do not end when they cross into the borders of the District of Columbia, said Sen. Hutchison.
The gun ban has been proven ineffective by the trend of increased violent crime in the District. The citizens of Washington, D.C., deserve to have the same right to defend themselves and their families in their homes that lawful Americans enjoy.
This requires both a legislative and judicial remedy. I hope the Parker case goes before the Supreme Court and that the court asserts that the right to bear arms is an individual, and not a collective, right as the D.C. Circuit and Fifth Circuit Courts have affirmed.
Instapundit snarks that perhaps Jim Webb will consider cosponsoring the legislation. Can his executive assistant cosponsor? He already seems to be observing the not-yet-passed law.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at March 29, 2007 11:41 AM (pzen5)
Sorry again about ours.
Posted by: Slublog at March 29, 2007 11:51 AM (R8+nJ)
Hey, at least Olympia and Susan voted against that stupid "get em out" appropriations bill.
I was surprised.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at March 29, 2007 11:53 AM (pzen5)
If anything this should prove that the handgun ban is useless. Since the law's inception there have been dramatic increases and decreases in crime. That right there should be enough to have the law overturned. Hutchinson shouldn't have to resort to lies to make her point.
Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2007 12:09 PM (FKJxp)
Posted by: Fierce Scorpion at March 29, 2007 12:09 PM (CdPfY)
I don't know when you moved out, but that's the old DC. 14th and R is currently in the midst of gentrification. Violent crimes there are rare.
Again, I reiterate my support of eliminating this silly ban, but I wish people would understand that Washington, DC is not a war zone anymore.
Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2007 12:13 PM (FKJxp)
I was there from 1988 to 1993. Regarding your assessment of crime in the District, I hope you're right, I have no knowledge of the current crime statistics. Simply an anecdote.
Posted by: Fierce Scorpion at March 29, 2007 12:51 PM (CdPfY)
Posted by: SOC at March 29, 2007 12:58 PM (1/F/d)
Posted by: Stormy70 at March 29, 2007 01:30 PM (7WJsV)
Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2007 01:33 PM (xFmjp)
Give them back to Maryland, if maryland will have them.
Posted by: Toby928 at March 29, 2007 02:13 PM (ATbKm)
Those are the people I've sent to Washington D.C. You bastards owe me.
Posted by: FrakYou at March 29, 2007 03:41 PM (AOc4L)
Posted by: The Great Satans Sr, Intern at March 29, 2007 04:35 PM (V5nPg)
I thought all the crime stopped when the Bullets changed their name to the Wizards. PC saves the day again! Go PC.
Interestingly enough, while crime plummeted in D.C. once it was no longer encouraged by the name of the local sports concern, gun murders in Salt Lake City have more than tripled since ESPN took to nick-naming Andrei Kirilenko "AK-47".
Will we never learn the power of words?
Posted by: VJay at March 29, 2007 05:12 PM (HaFcU)
Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at March 29, 2007 06:13 PM (4rhjR)
I know someone who worked on her most recent campaign. She's a damn fine senator.
And the only female other than Condi that I'd consider for President. Kay rocks. But please get the spelling right folks, Hutchison. Only one N.
Posted by: otcconan at March 29, 2007 08:47 PM (z7Tck)
Posted by: otcconan at March 29, 2007 08:48 PM (z7Tck)
"Washington, DC is not a war zone anymore"
Been to Southeast lately? You wouldn't live long if you started walking around at night even if you were within sight of the Capitol building.
Posted by: Former Lurker at March 29, 2007 10:36 PM (Xm4xl)
As for the crime statistics: http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm
Posted by: Rusty at March 30, 2007 05:47 AM (FKJxp)
Get a clue before you post about a part of the city (maybe even city, period?) you've clearly never been to. I live in Southeast, and I have walked around, by myself, at all hours of the night without ever feeling uncomfortable. On my typical walk (from the Metro, a bar, whatever) I will pass more than two Capitol Police vehicles and usually a couple of MPD cruisers. And they aren't there arresting people or solving crimes, as I'm sure your mind jumped to. The point is, they are a presence. I've never been harassed, threatened, or otherwise by anyone.
There are parts of SE that are much worse than where I live, particularly east of the Anacostia river, but to say "you wouldn't live long" is ignorant, paranoid, and inflammatory. Homicides are rare in this city and, just as in any large city, most are not random. Unless you piss somebody off by mouthing off, the worst thing you're likely to face is a mugging -- and even that is unlikely in even the worst neighborhoods.
Before all of you decide what's best for a city you don't live in, please at least do some real research about the city and don't base your perception on outdated stereotypes and the lies of one self-serving Senator. Kay Hutchison may indeed be a nice woman, but on this she's wrong. And until they give the citizens of this city representation, they should not be dictating to us what we can or cannot do.
Posted by: Keef at March 31, 2007 05:35 AM (OffnC)
Ceding the District back to Maryland, less the actual federal area, as was done with Arlington, would solve the representation issue. True?
Posted by: Toby928 at March 31, 2007 06:57 AM (ATbKm)
I am really tempted at this point to resort to insulting the majority of the above posters' intelligence, based on a few of the inane suggestions brought up by a few of you.
Ceding DC back to Maryland?
Acting as if the gun ban proposal was not a complete intentional distraction against the DC voting proposal?
Suggesting that "packing heat" will solve the problem of violent crime?
All of these are mind-bogglingly ridiculous.
DC is not a state, but doesn't need to be treated as if it is the property of the other state's senators. They shouldn't be able to decide what laws get made or unmade; our senator, who needs to exist, should.
The issue that needs to be addressed first is the right to vote in DC. All of you are just a wee bit scared that if DC gets a vote, it will most assuredly be a Democrat; that's the outrageous reasoning behind stapling an extra vote for Utah (overwhelmingly Republican) along with it.
Lastly, allowing the gun law to be undone is asking for an increase in violent crime. Not only did your precious Hutchison manage to bold-faced lie while defending her opinion, she didn't really stop to think that perhaps allowing the widespread use of guns could alter the decreases in crime. The ban has been said to be unconstitutional. The reason there is a ban is not because we're trying to "deny the public their second amendment rights", but rather to protect innocent lives from being shortened due to improper use of guns in street fights, gang disputes, and muggings. Less guns, less people killed.
No one needs to have a gun in the District. Stop acting as if it's the middle of Bogota, Colombia, for God's sake.
Posted by: Gretchen at April 02, 2007 03:59 PM (/sHjl)
Posted by: David at May 25, 2007 05:28 PM (6Q7wN)
DEWALT DW6810 No. 10 Size Joining Biscuits (75 Pieces), Barbara K! BK24366 2-Piece Stubby Screwdriver Set
Posted by: Steven at July 03, 2007 06:25 AM (Iu6AV)
Posted by: Harvey at July 03, 2007 10:39 AM (LbOD9)
Posted by: Jose at July 03, 2007 10:53 AM (NRrTx)
Posted by: Malcolm at July 04, 2007 04:34 AM (ohEnw)
Posted by: Dumanjukt at July 04, 2007 11:38 AM (kmjzu)
Posted by: Jer at August 12, 2007 09:31 PM (Tqa0j)
Posted by: Sherri at September 04, 2007 01:31 AM (tQjTl)
Posted by: Jodie at September 10, 2007 07:06 AM (xsDjA)
Posted by: Cordie at October 17, 2007 05:46 AM (EpVKX)
Posted by: Luther at October 17, 2007 05:47 AM (+xL30)
Posted by: Jessie at October 17, 2007 06:11 AM (elG70)
Posted by: Willie at October 17, 2007 06:26 AM (F1ibH)
Posted by: Latonya at October 17, 2007 08:25 AM (iNRq0)
Posted by: Michael at November 21, 2007 12:39 AM (MAtQP)
Posted by: Bethany at November 28, 2007 07:41 AM (sjzX4)
Posted by: Laura at November 28, 2007 07:46 AM (UydRk)
Posted by: Frances at November 28, 2007 07:47 AM (4qtJ9)
Posted by: Joshua at November 28, 2007 07:49 AM (vu5WZ)
Posted by: Michael at November 28, 2007 07:52 AM (zzRRI)
Posted by: Jodie at November 28, 2007 07:54 AM (AjE8J)
Posted by: Judith at November 28, 2007 07:55 AM (Gv0A8)
Posted by: Sharon at November 28, 2007 07:56 AM (bikRR)
Posted by: Margaret at November 28, 2007 07:58 AM (gZhGI)
Posted by: Cody at November 28, 2007 08:02 AM (BMifa)
Posted by: Erik at January 14, 2008 03:56 AM (OrROy)
Posted by: Leslie at January 14, 2008 03:56 AM (rnuNI)
62 queries taking 1.0465 seconds, 285 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.