April 29, 2007

Celsius 41.11: The Temperature At Which The Brain Melts
— Ace

Good, long (1 hr 11 minutes) rebuttal of Farhenheit 9/11 and the general liberal mythologies about the War on Terror.

It may or may not be old, but it's new to me. Definitely worth a watch.

Posted by: Ace at 05:03 PM | Comments (11)
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

1 So far, it seems a good watch.
Worst case of day late and dollar short I've seen.

Tom

Posted by: Tom m at April 29, 2007 06:25 PM (Cycyn)

2 It's archaic.  It was released before the 2004 elections.  Well before.

Still, pretty much distills all of the idiotic talking points of the left down and debunks them all very well.

Posted by: wiserbud at April 29, 2007 06:36 PM (56ssE)

3 This is the type of thing they could throw together in days.
Why don't they?



Posted by: Tom m at April 29, 2007 06:48 PM (Cycyn)

4

To be honest, I wish they would make one that doesn't preach to the choir so much.  You couldn't show this to a lefty and get them to give it any serious consideration, because of the "jingoistic" (is that a word?) overtones, and the end is basically GWB campaign propaganda. 


If some of this was presented in less enthusiastically pro-Bush tones, it would better serve its purpose.


Posted by: DaveS at April 29, 2007 07:06 PM (6DuOs)

5 I thought the same until I found out it was an election year anti Kerry piece.


Posted by: Tom m at April 29, 2007 07:13 PM (Cycyn)

6 ya its old, but its worth watching now again that Fred! is a potential candidate, makes me wish our side cheated like the democrats so i could vote for him twice or have my dead uncle, grandpa, and cousin vote for him too.

Posted by: Steven C at April 29, 2007 10:17 PM (uGdhe)

7 Remember that as we head into a new election, it's going to be very much, or entirely about, Bush's responses to 9/11, so this movie is a good refresher of what was done and why and what the Democrats wanted to do (and will do) instead. Also, lots of Fred Thompson in this videa, who may become the Republican nominee.

Posted by: Nemo at April 30, 2007 03:30 AM (3be7b)

8 Horribly partisan and factually incorrect.  Go see Sicko!

Posted by: Michael Moo...um, I mean Smith at April 30, 2007 03:43 AM (0140v)

9 It isn't incorrect, but it does come across as too partisan to win anyone over.

Posted by: DaveS at April 30, 2007 04:31 AM (wEYaf)

10 How does this compare to FahrenHYPE 9/11?

Posted by: Some Guy at April 30, 2007 04:37 AM (lPxkl)

11 Watch Fahrenhype 9/11 full here!
http://againstred.blogspot.com/2007/08/fahrenhype-911-debunking-michael-moore.html

Posted by: luis afonso at August 24, 2007 05:56 PM (P+/p7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
73kb generated in CPU 0.12, elapsed 1.4378 seconds.
62 queries taking 1.3981 seconds, 247 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.