November 18, 2009
— DrewM And Andy McCarthy Fisks the hell out of him.
6. In a civilian trial, America will see KSM for the coward that he is Holder: "I am not scared of KSM." Submitting a war criminal to a military commission is not an exercise in fear; it is an exercise in justice. We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations. You could fill a book a book with it, which the 9/11 Commission did. We don't need to bear the risks of a civilian trial either to learn more about KSM or so Mr. Holder can show how brave he is.
For the liberal vision of this, check out Chris Good at The Atlantic's Politics Blog (It's a "Milky Loads" free zone). Good assures us that Holder understands we are at war because, well, Holder says, "I know that we are at war". Case close, the science is settled.
Good then goes on to parse the difference between the Bush and Obama approaches.
But despite the Obama administration's attempts to get away from Bush's language, the war on terrorism is something that it can't get away from. Today we had Obama's top law enforcement official full embrace that ethos. If that tells us anything, it's that at critical moments of national security, the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview.
Here's the thing, when the President takes this portfolio from the military and gives it to his "top law enforcement official" that's a clue that he most definitely is not treating this like a war. See if Obama thought this was a war, he'd let the m-i-l-i-t-a-r-y handle it, not the AG.
Remember military commissions were not just the work of Bush and Cheney's evil dreams, they were created by Congress (something a certain junior Senator from Illinois seemed pretty happy about at one time).
War. Law enforcement. Just words.
Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any US citizen who steals a car.
Obama, Holder and the rest of the left tell us this will awe the world, make them love us and prevent future attacks. You know, just like the trial and conviction of the first WTC bombers did.
Just another example of the 'reality based community' ignoring reality.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:57 AM
| Comments (185)
Post contains 459 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:01 AM (z37MR)
As opposed to the screamingly apparent competence of the current administration. Right, buddy. Got Unicorn?®
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 07:01 AM (aC0uO)
Posted by: joncelli at November 18, 2009 07:03 AM (RD7QR)
Hey, as far as I'm concerned KSM is shovel-ready!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 07:03 AM (aC0uO)
What annoyed me most about the snippet I saw on Fox News was that Holder said that one of the factors that went into the decision was "the probability of success".
KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be?
Posted by: Anachronda at November 18, 2009 07:04 AM (1OYcp)
Holder has good reason not to be afraid of KSM -- the Bush admin apprehended KSM and he's no longer a threat.
But Holder and Obama are fools for not fearing KSM's legions of followers who are roaming around freely. Holder and Obama are putting the rest of us, (those with no security detail), at great risk.
Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:06 AM (z37MR)
Not for terrorists, necessarily: but for regular Americans.
If the trials are shoo-in show trials (as I think everyone left and right sort of admits), then convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR. By trying them as American civilians, they legitimize military tactics against civilian defendants.
Posted by: DoDoGuRu at November 18, 2009 07:07 AM (Xdxf8)
You're missing the point, Drew.
If you handle this in a criminal court, then -- even if he's acquitted -- you can later sue for damages in civil court.
Posted by: FireHorse at November 18, 2009 07:07 AM (Vl5GH)
KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be?
Yeah, the successful prosecution of KSM is not what Obama and Holder have in mind. As Rush says, this trial is the prosecution of the United States, George Bush, and Western Civilization.
Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:08 AM (z37MR)
True but then it would take resources away from KSM that he could use to find the 'real terrorists'.
Posted by: DrewM. at November 18, 2009 07:09 AM (FCWQb)
Posted by: awkward davies at November 18, 2009 07:11 AM (wb68R)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:12 AM (Xm1aB)
This decision is already biting them in the ass. Today's Rasmussen Daily Presidential tracking poll has the O-hole at -14. http://tinyurl.com/5tnd2b
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:12 AM (kn+jW)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:14 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:14 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (SqAkN)
You know who else Eric Holder isn't afraid of?
The CIA.
I'm just trying figure out how he's gonna juggle both cases without it being politically detrimental to Obama.
Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (NtiET)
What bothered me about it was when I turned on Fox to watch a little of it while eating lunch they did the lead in with Lindsey F'kn Graham, friend of the terrorist crapweasel.
I turned it off. The only Republicans Fox puts on with any regularity are Graham and McLame. Can you say PR for the squishes?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 07:17 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (mka2b)
Everyone on the left seems to think there will not be a plan hatched once KSM and others are imprisoned in the HeartLand. One of the largest vistories for our enemies would be to spring one of these terrorists out of a maximum security prison. I'm glad there is no plans to keep them anywhere near me.
Everyone on the left also seems to think that by not doing this would make us hypocrites. I don't get it. Can somebody please explain that to me?
Posted by: Jimi at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (ZBY0f)
Brings up an interesting possibility--trial will be conducted sometime after O leaves office?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (NtiET)
Will this be televised?
I know COURT TV is gone, but will cameras be allowed in the courtroom? Why do I suspect the Obama admin will try to televise this show trial for all the world to see?
Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:19 AM (z37MR)
Thanks again FiftyTwo Percenters, you fucking fucks.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 07:20 AM (erIg9)
Nice precedent they're setting, I'll tell you what.
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:21 AM (wVPwI)
Not to mention: Presumption of Innocence.
Posted by: franksalterego at November 18, 2009 07:24 AM (GKyIE)
The only thing that's worked for them in the past has been to run against GW Bush- so enter the KSM Road Show soon to open for (at least) a full year "It's All Bush's Fault" orgy through the 2010 election cycle.
I used to think Goebbels would be proud of the BO administration, but now I'm not so sure- I'm sure he would be more discreet in his efforts to distract the public.
Posted by: Hannibal Lecter at November 18, 2009 07:24 AM (OtQXp)
Just think, this whole debacle could have been prevented if we'd only executed that POS.
It is perfectly legal to do so.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (ZGhSv)
Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?
What happens to the case law? 5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial?
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (wVPwI)
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (OtQXp)
I am fucking sick of this shit:
"...the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview."
You know what you fucking asshole, it was the fucking media and the fucking Democrats that has passed that totally unjustified judgement on GWB, not the American people!
GWB apparently "bungled" a response to a type of attack that had never before confronted this country, with the "help" of an antagonistic media and a Democrat party that opportunistically jumped ship on him (and us) at the first setback, and yet he managed to stop attacks on us for 8 years. Some bungler.
Hey Obama, when you learn to "bungle" as well as GWB, maybe you'll be worth more than a bucket of warm spit, but so far you show little promise of pulling it off, Genuflecter-in-Cheif!!
ps. FYBO
Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:28 AM (G9/8V)
"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"
If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect. This decision can be summed up as Obama going full retard.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:29 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Penfold at November 18, 2009 07:29 AM (lF2Kk)
Iquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: drfredc at November 18, 2009 07:30 AM (puRnk)
Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?
What happens to the case law? 5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial?
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (wVPwI)
Excellent points all but, in the "judgment" of the administration, they all must be set aside in consideration of the ultimate goal- maintaining power.
And according to their political calculus they need a flashback appearance of the Bush/Cheney bogeyman to hold onto power- rule of law and national security be damned!
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:30 AM (OtQXp)
There is a not-miniscule chance that this trial will end in an acquittal for KSM.
If that happens, that's a huge black eye for Obama.
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:31 AM (PwGfd)
In addition to the 10 detainees named Friday, Holder is expected to send others to trials and commissions in the United States.
Another, larger group of detainees is expected to be released to other countries. Some, the president has said, are too dangerous to be released and cannot be put on trial, and those detainees will continue to be imprisoned
i really don't understand this
why commissions for some, they don't consider ksm dangerous?
Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: slade at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (XsHAM)
Posted by: Orenthal James Simpson at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (6Q9g2)
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground.
Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 07:35 AM (jvrmc)
"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"
If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect.Exactly, but do you think The Powers That Be will let that happen? Holder and Obama have publicly promised and guaranteed a conviction. If they can't deliver, God help us all.
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (wVPwI)
Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any U.S. citizen who steals a car.
The car thief stands a better chance getting a longer sentence if convicted, and a better chance of being convicted, than do KSM and friends.
I've had enough liberal pseudo-idealism, how about you?
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (PZLW0)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (ABUF9)
I'd expect at LEAST a year, longer if either side wants to drag things out further.
That's a potentially long sideshow for the Obama administration to put on.
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:37 AM (6Q9g2)
New Black Panther Party and upon acceptance (them not being white and also down with the struggle) will have all charges dropped.
Then they will be released in either South Chicago or Detroit and issued "Ceremonial" nightsticks.
Problem solved.
Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (lD4DZ)
convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR at a Tea Party Protest
ftfy
If you think they aren't going to justify show-trials against internal dissidents, you must believe in skittles-shitting unicorns.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: Mystry at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (kmgIE)
I'm not sure an acquittal hurts his standing with anyone who doesn't already despise him.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (NtiET)
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:39 AM (wVPwI)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:39 AM (ABUF9)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: pam at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (AYWcM)
I'm not really certain here which would be scarier: letting KSM walk due to tainted evidence or other technicalities, or being convicted and sentenced in spite of the tainted evidence and other technicalities.
Unless they can drag it out past 2012, which maybe they are planning on, if the POS gets off then Obam'ter and the Dems are done for at least a generation. If he gets convicted, I think it only proves it was a kangaroo court show trial to begin with. Either way, these "smart" people in charge are taking one helluva risk, with little upside for reward.
Posted by: JamesLee at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (GNi4/)
The answer is, of course, yes.
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (wVPwI)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (Xm1aB)
(holding nose) Order in the court! Please remove the defendant immediately, shave, and bathe him for chrissakes!
Posted by: NYC Judge at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (wAQA5)
Separately, a member of the Judiciary committee, Democrat Charles Schumer of New York, is urging the administration to reimburse the city for what he says could be $75 million in extra security costs related to the terror trials.
Breitbart
Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:44 AM (kn+jW)
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (wVPwI)
That would be true if one of the Great Terrorists of our age was on trial. In reality, thanks to the assistance of the media, GWB, Dick Cheney, the CIA, FBI, and the entire US intelligence community will be on trial- allowing the administration to dredge up all the old worn out "failed policy of the previous administration" rhetoric which is what they need to energize the young voters who stayed home in NJ and Virginia two weeks ago.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (OtQXp)
Obviously there are individuals who are in the tank for Obama, and whose opinion will never change no matter what he does.
But I think if the "mastermind" of 9-11 walks, there is going to be a LOT of anger at the Nobel-Peace prize-winning administration.
Even if it doesn't cause his supporters to drop him, a KSM acquittal will definitely energize his opponents.
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (ABUF9)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (Xm1aB)
If Obama is re-elected, the trial proceeds apace - because it's outcome doesn't matter politically to him anymore. If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican.
Posted by: FreakyBoy at November 18, 2009 07:46 AM (4s1it)
Posted by: sissoed at November 18, 2009 07:47 AM (XpBZo)
Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (8HaDt)
Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (G9/8V)
pam
I'm afraid Republicans might see a public trial as a gold plated club to beat Democrats with in the coming years and thus may not fight this wholeheartedly
Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (jvrmc)
Sofa King and Carpet Demon
took shelter from the rain.
When Master Bait
showed up late,
he left them with a stain.
Posted by: Max Power at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (q177U)
Many people will probably want to think twice about attending the New Year's Eve celebration in Times Square. I know I wouldn't.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (kn+jW)
If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican.
FreakyBoy at November 18, 2009 12:46 PM
Hell, I don't think barry could survive a primary race with David Duke or Perez Hilton
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (ABUF9)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (Xm1aB)
1. Holder gets out there with Obama and say they know KSM is guilty----Mistrial much?
2. We try them in civilian courts if they attack civilians (KSM-WTC) and military courts if they attack the military (Cole bombers) (just forget about the Pentagon) and that tells the terrorists what? Attack civilians on american soil...you got it.
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 07:51 AM (twCqO)
Posted by: Scrapiron at November 18, 2009 07:51 AM (1kwr2)
First of all, its not up to the Obama administration. KSM's lawyers and the judge in question will have a say too. If KSM wants to drag this out he well may get that chance.
Also, if Obama were primarily interested in making this "swift" he could have allowed KSM to plead guilty as he attempted to do last year.
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:53 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:54 AM (Xm1aB)
Wasn't it Holder that called American's cowards? So, in his twisted logic, he equates all Americans with KSM. Nice.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 07:55 AM (EL+OC)
How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers? Hmmmm?
Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry... capice'?
Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:55 AM (G9/8V)
I thought one of them said that if he isn't convicted they still won't let him go. So what's the point?
Where do these asswipes get the idea that foreigners get the protection of the US constitution?
Does the loony left think we had sheep herder's children locked up and undergoing torture at Gitmo? What's all the sympathy for? Just US hating?
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (twCqO)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (Xm1aB)
I'm sure the NYCPD and NYCFD will have a group of greeters present when they step foot out the courthouse.
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:54 PM (Xm1aB)
Along with high-potency pheremone spray, a prize boar hog, and a camcorder.
For starters...
Definite U-tube moment...
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (OtQXp)
this will not end well
the AG and the Present are already on record as guaranteeing convictions- I'm sure KSM's lawyer's first motion will be for for dismissal
Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 08:00 AM (KOkrW)
Lifetime appointments makes one a little safer in following your ideological bent, no matter how stupid it may seem to everyone else. E.G., the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Posted by: Mallamutt at November 18, 2009 08:00 AM (V9SYy)
Maybe Holder means the term "coward" as a compliment, considering that he called the USA a country of cowards.
#80
You do have to wonder what exactly the Holder "backup plan" is, assuming that KSM is acquitted (which again, is entirely possible).
If they don't intend to let him go, then where are they going to put him? The new Guantanamo? If they aren't going to release him after a "not-guilty" verdict, then when will they EVER release him?
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 08:01 AM (6Q9g2)
How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers? Hmmmm?
Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry...I was born and lived in downstate NY for years. We still have many friends and family that exist there. It's hopeless. Believe me on this one.
Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 08:02 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:02 AM (Xm1aB)
Attack civilians=full blown trial with the same rights as a car thief and a witness stand from which to preach a little jihad.
Gee, I wonder who the future targets of terror might be.
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (Xm1aB)
Attack a Kindergarten = Time out.
Posted by: WalrusRex at November 18, 2009 08:04 AM (xxgag)
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?
If not, what is ther difference.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:04 AM (Vqruj)
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 08:06 AM (ABUF9)
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?
If not, what is ther difference.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 01:04 PM (Vqruj)
The only explanation I can come up with is that they started dumping massive doses of Stupid Serum into the drinking water in about 1963.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 08:07 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:07 AM (wVPwI)
They'll ask for a dismissal, but won't get it.
Their #2 motion will be to have the trial taken out of NYC, arguing that the jury pool in New York is tainted because of 9-11.
There is going to be a HUGE fight pre-trial in this case around evidence. Team KSM is going to try to get ALL of it (much of it classified), and try to use it to embarrass the gov't. Then Team KSM is going to get as much of it as possible knocked out, claiming it was obtained illegally, under duress from waterboarding, etc. This discovery fighting will probably drag on for months, with each side appealing and counter-appealing any decision on critical evidence.
Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (Xm1aB)
Attack a Kindergarten = Time out.
Attack a Christian Church = Red carpet treatment at any given Hollywood awards ceremony
Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (AYWcM)
Rush is reading this thread, apparently. This case is going to get thrown out, and Wee Wee seems to be working towards that end.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:10 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:11 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:11 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:11 PM (+sBB4)
...and CIA interrogators.
Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (OtQXp)
Doesn't the defence get to choose the jury? I imagine they can find twelve Muslims without problem. There's an aquittal right there.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (eNxMU)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:16 AM (Xm1aB)
The congressional GOP should develop articles of impeachment alleging, to start, that Obama's administration is, instead of protecting Americans, actively endangering them by 1) transferring Gitmo detainees into the U.S., and 2) holding the KSM trial in NYC.
Let's roll!
^^ This!
Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 08:16 AM (0cdUt)
The question about judges and prosecutors wasn't about their professional careers.
It was a about their show-biz careers, when they and their families show up on Youtube being beheaded.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 18, 2009 08:17 AM (d0ih6)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: Todd at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (LLOGQ)
>All it takes is one, single muslim on the jury to prevent a conviction.
That's it, just one. Or a terrorist sympathizer.
or a Truther
or a Bush hater
or a Kos kid
a DUer
a Huffposter
etc etc etc
Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (KOkrW)
Posted by: Justin Camp at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2009 08:20 AM (E725N)
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:20 AM (wVPwI)
Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (mka2b)
The bottom of the barrel - the same place The Precedent is from. And we are really scraping it, now.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:22 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:22 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 08:25 AM (twCqO)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:25 AM (+sBB4)
Obama's mission is to weaken the US. Everything about it, everything that makes it exceptional, everything that makes it the greatest, most successful human experiment ever. He and his handlers want all that gone.
This fucktarded farce of a trial makes things worse any way you slice it. That's not a bug, it's a feature.
He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency.
Yeah. . .it actually happened.
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 08:26 AM (yUybe)
the testimony will set Bush/Cheney up to get a indictment for war crimes in an international court and that's the point.
That, and every CIA and SF operator we had in-theater. This is all about justifying 9/11 and putting the U.S. on trial.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:27 AM (Haq+B)
He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency.
Yeah. . .it actually happened.
Yup.
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Haq+B)
Techie, how is that different? Are you suggesting that Japanese who WERE wearing uniforms should be treated worse than Muzztards who weren't?
Those who do not wear uniforms are customarily executed summarily.
Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Vqruj)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Xm1aB)
Terrorists on trial:
Miami (AP) A Miami man convicted of plotting to destroy Chicago's Sears Tower and bomb FBI offices has been sentenced to six years in federal prison.
U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard imposed the sentence Wednesday on 24-year-old Burson Augustin.
Prosecutors sought the maximum 30-year sentence for Augustin. Lenard ruled that sentencing terrorism enhancements should not apply to Augustin, who was not the leader.
The men were convicted in May of supporting Al-Qaida, conspiring to wage war on the U.S. and other charges. There were two mistrials, and two other men were acquitted. All denied plotting terror attacks.
Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 08:30 AM (1Jaio)
What about religion? If I'm a prosecutor in this case, I'm striking every muslim I can.
Is this legal?
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:22 PM (Xm1aB)
No. They can't reject a juror just for religion - especially seeing how the feral government (and others) have just gone out of their way to claim that screaming, "Allahu akhbar!" before spraying unarmed people with bullets serves no indication of any ties to jihadism ... but, given that just about everyone in New York was there for 9/11, it would be immensely easy to ask some questions that would show bias and, thus, reject whatever jurors they want "for cause".
The problem, of course, is that we would normally think that the prosecuting attorney would be the one looking to strike muslims, liberals, and other terrorist sympathizers from the jury, but the sad fact is that the prosecuting attorney and the whole of the feral government's executive branch ARE terrorist sympathizers (and worse, even) and they are going to be the ones happy to stack the jury with muslims and terror lovers. Holder will explain it by saying that he is not scared of having 6 muslims on the jury.
The only solution this nation has is to forcibly eject The Precedent, Holder, and the whole fetid administration - to then prosecute all of them for treason and various other crimes against the nation. Barring that ... we are just f#cked. Look forward to a split in the nation, because that is the only light left at the end of this tunnel of stupidity and America-hate and the only way to preserve the American creed.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:30 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:32 AM (+sBB4)
- Jon Kyle
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:33 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 01:26 PM (yUybe)
Yep, it did.
I would just disagree with you on one part - The Precedent is stupid. He's just lucky that any fool can destroy a complex system, especially one that has been put on the very edge of destruction as the monetary crisis has done to us. It wouldn't be tough for a 12 year old to run an aircraft carrier aground, if you gave him the helm, especially if he wanted to and if he staffed the ship with the same sort of useful idiots who populate the feral government - people who think that grounded aircraft carriers are better because you don't have to worry about navigating them and all that difficult stuff.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:35 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (Haq+B)
Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (LLOGQ)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (dQdrY)
I feel violated and raped all over again; I cannot wait to get the hell out of this miserable freak show called NYC.
Mayor Mommy-Nanny could have said NO but he cares more about protecting rapists than he does for those who have been raped.
Dear NYC FREAKS-
I lived here for 20 years, paid a shit-load of taxes, put up with endless lairs wearing smiley-faces and when I leave my only wish to you is may you forever rot away in your own freak show sewer.
Sincerely
a former brain-dead liberal whose veil of provincial myopia slipped away while watching the WTC crumble into ash on 9-11-2001.
Posted by: syn at November 18, 2009 08:39 AM (ZjEOd)
Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:39 AM (Xm1aB)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:40 AM (+sBB4)
The AG going on record presuming guilt is not a big deal,isn't every prosecutor confident the defendant is guilty?It's the president coming out with the presumption of guilt that is absolutely mind boggling
Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 08:43 AM (jvrmc)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 08:46 AM (dQdrY)
Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?
If not, what is ther difference.
The Pearl Harbor attackers were the Japanese Navy. I fail to see how they are equivalent to Al Queda. You can't and don't put POWs on trail. It'd be idiotic.
Whom you DO put on trail are spies and saboteurs.
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:47 AM (wVPwI)
So, if they let this piece of shit go, where would they release him? Pakistan?
And what is going to stop KSM from trying to represent himself using the courtroom as his personal soap box to recite the Koran?
Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 08:49 AM (LLOGQ)
Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (wVPwI)
This sets so much bad precedent on so many levels; all of them stated above. This could change the ROE in such a way as to make the prosecution of the war more dangerous and less successful for our military. This puts the conviction of terrorists within question, which is utter bs. This puts the civilian population at risk (intimidating/influencing the jury/jusry pool perhaps? yeah, I think so). It sets the precedent for using military tactics on ordinary American civilians -- this is a biggie to me. The list goes on and on.
This isn't about prosecuting terrorists; this is about trying to set precedent for future control of the populace. And it's a nasty piece of work all around.
Posted by: unknown jane at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Mike H at November 18, 2009 08:53 AM (cvvNY)
All of that international crap that the Left loves is being stood on its head.
If KSM is a soldier, then he is a POW and we can hold him until the end of hostilities but we cannot interrogate him in any serious way.
If KSM is a terrorist waging war on the US, then he is treated as either a pirate or a spy.
If KSM is a civilian with legal residence in the US, then he is a criminal subject to the US justice system.
But there is nothing in international law or even US law that allows us to kidnap someone from another country, bring him to the US for a civilian trial and put him in a civilian jail.
I am surprised the Left is still defending this. There must be some lefty (Hitchens?) for whom this stinks. We are seeing the moral preening of the Left laid bare.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 08:53 AM (T0NGe)
If you're trying guys with "exceptions to the normal rules", like habeus corpus, Miranda, etc - then you're diluting those self-same protections for the rest of us. "He's a terrorist, we can skimp on..." There have been a couple of crazies that have been charged under "terrorism" laws when more ordinary charges would have applied previous to 2001.
Add this to the freaking insanity of Janet's predilection of feeling tea parties are terrorists - or at least terrorist sympathizers.
This entire approach is fraught from start to finish.
And that's ignoring "What do you do with an openly avowed AQ member that simply shoots a serviceman in a combat zone?"
You aren't going to get convictions for "murder" on a regular basis. Essentially because "defending the homeland" is a pretty reasonable application of self-defense. We don't actually -see- this very often as we haven't historically crossed civilian and war courts very much. But avoiding this crossing is actually the central tenet of the origins of the original freaking Geneva Convention.
Posted by: Al at November 18, 2009 08:59 AM (VtygY)
Posted by: wrg at November 18, 2009 09:11 AM (7t+Ws)
Posted by: ed at November 18, 2009 09:22 AM (Urhve)
Amal Abusumayah was paying for groceries at the Jewel store at 17117 S. Harlem Ave. in Tinley Park on Nov. 7 when she felt a sharp tug on her headscarf. When she looked at who had pulled her hijab, she saw a woman who moments before had made a derogatory comment about Islam.
On Wednesday, Tinley Park police announced that Valerie Kenney, 54, has been charged with a hate crime, a felony that carries a possible sentence of up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000.
"I was shaken up," Abusumayah told the SouthtownStar about the Nov. 7 assault. "This is my dignity and this is my religion."
Ahmed Rehab of the Chicago chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said his organization has reached out to the FBI to pursue federal charges.
I see. Killing 13 people while shouting Allah Akbar is nothing more than a stress related incident and tugging on a scarf is a case for the FBI.
Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 09:35 AM (1Jaio)
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground.
Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 12:35 PM (jvrmc)
Look: an Ivy League law degree either means (1) you scored great on the LSAT or (2) you are eligible for affirmative action.
That's it. Once you're in, there's no failure. None at all. Yale doesn't have grades, FGS. When you're accepted, they print your diploma.
This is also the approach we get when lawyers run our system. There are some good lawyers, but they don't think like lawyers. Look at Lindsay Graham. He's a lawyer, so he approaches all problems this way, that the justice system is the answer to all of life's problems.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 09:36 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 10:16 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: DANEgerus at November 18, 2009 10:58 AM (LMi2C)
Yes. The important part for people to remember is that the prosecution is working for the defense, and both are working against America. What we have is a "hostile prosecutor". Of course, most of us knew this when Holder was up for confirmation. All of the GOP slime who voted to confirm that dirtball should be tossed out and shunned, relegated to living on the streets where they belong, the scumbags.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 11:22 AM (A46hP)
What, and give them two more liberal Senators?
Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 11:32 AM (CDUiN)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (dQdrY)
Holder: "I am not scared of KSM."
How convienient, especially when you weren't the one who put yourself in harm's way to get the bastard. That was done by the CIA, the very agency you want to vicariously put on trial.
Suckwad.
Posted by: SFC MAC at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (cuNX0)
We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations.
Would these be the same CIA interrogations the current regime insists didn't uncover any relevant information? The ones Cheney said worked and Douchebag said didn't? None of that information would be admissible in a real court because he was under duress. This guy should be tried by a military tribunal and then hung. We did the same things to Germans in the same city in WW2. I had to laugh the other night because Bob Beckel on Hannity asked what would you do if Germans sabatoged something and Hannity gave him a pass on it. We already have precedent for this type of action. This guy was caught on a battlefield in civilian clothes. The Geneva Convention is very clear about what rights this murderer has. NONE!
Posted by: Bill R. at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (EhlQq)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 12:44 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: jason at November 18, 2009 04:32 PM (fRLM+)
Festival Museum Nusantara
Khairuddin syach Lahat
Matt Khay
Info Pendidikan
Just Khay
Just Khay
Posted by: Iklan Baris Gratis at March 14, 2010 01:39 PM (8/od3)
Posted by: sorry at March 29, 2010 06:58 AM (VNfTE)
Posted by: amery buck at March 30, 2010 04:26 AM (i2nYc)
Posted by: Mark at May 06, 2010 07:22 AM (6DZhO)
visitors will find that very useful.
vps hosting | hosting | ucvhost
Posted by: Herry at July 08, 2010 07:04 AM (tliCy)
Posted by: blankets at September 27, 2010 01:13 AM (0q8av)
Posted by: Anonymous at September 29, 2010 08:25 AM (fgLcB)
Posted by: auto at October 22, 2010 12:29 AM (ygYRs)
Posted by: franck at November 20, 2010 05:26 AM (TdD91)
Posted by: shixian at January 15, 2011 10:19 PM (1FYRm)
Posted by: advertizing digitizing at January 31, 2011 01:27 AM (mBhkk)
Posted by: หนังโป๊ออนไลน์ at February 23, 2011 08:36 AM (bq6Qj)
Posted by: Anonymous at March 01, 2011 07:33 PM (wW3uo)
Posted by: idm ถาวร at March 07, 2011 07:23 AM (24/6c)
Posted by: tanisha1987 at March 09, 2011 03:36 AM (oYR1q)
Posted by: ipod to mac at April 06, 2011 06:55 AM (kfyJW)
Posted by: asus vh242h at May 24, 2011 04:44 AM (bPnJP)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:56 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:58 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 01:00 AM (5a2XP)
Posted by: คลิบงูกินคน at July 17, 2011 07:11 PM (IwD23)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at August 06, 2011 12:50 AM (JcxoV)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at December 18, 2011 02:58 PM (y7lGT)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 07, 2012 09:34 PM (M7WRF)
Various discount northface jackets online for women and men in our northface outlet. Top quality and latest style North Face Jackets for men, women and kids. this is good choice to choose for chrismas gift.
Posted by: discount north face jackets at January 13, 2012 09:18 PM (I38MY)
Read more:http://za-bata.exteen.com/20111024/entry#ixzz1jRPvowqr อักษรพิเศษ
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 14, 2012 09:06 AM (Ny8Th)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 22, 2012 09:51 PM (ZUGtt)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 25, 2012 02:56 AM (xA1c1)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 27, 2012 12:57 PM (L0M88)
Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at February 02, 2012 02:15 PM (525qI)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









