November 18, 2009

AG Eric "Nation Of Cowards" Holder Testifies About Civilian Trials For Terrorists
— DrewM

And Andy McCarthy Fisks the hell out of him.

A taste.

6. In a civilian trial, America will see KSM for the coward that he is – Holder: "I am not scared of KSM." Submitting a war criminal to a military commission is not an exercise in fear; it is an exercise in justice. We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations. You could fill a book a book with it, which the 9/11 Commission did. We don't need to bear the risks of a civilian trial either to learn more about KSM or so Mr. Holder can show how brave he is.

For the liberal vision of this, check out Chris Good at The Atlantic's Politics Blog (It's a "Milky Loads" free zone). Good assures us that Holder understands we are at war because, well, Holder says, "I know that we are at war". Case close, the science is settled.

Good then goes on to parse the difference between the Bush and Obama approaches.

But despite the Obama administration's attempts to get away from Bush's language, the war on terrorism is something that it can't get away from. Today we had Obama's top law enforcement official full embrace that ethos. If that tells us anything, it's that at critical moments of national security, the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview.

Here's the thing, when the President takes this portfolio from the military and gives it to his "top law enforcement official" that's a clue that he most definitely is not treating this like a war. See if Obama thought this was a war, he'd let the m-i-l-i-t-a-r-y handle it, not the AG.

Remember military commissions were not just the work of Bush and Cheney's evil dreams, they were created by Congress (something a certain junior Senator from Illinois seemed pretty happy about at one time).

War. Law enforcement. Just words.

Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any US citizen who steals a car.

Obama, Holder and the rest of the left tell us this will awe the world, make them love us and prevent future attacks. You know, just like the trial and conviction of the first WTC bombers did.

Just another example of the 'reality based community' ignoring reality.

Posted by: DrewM at 06:57 AM | Comments (185)
Post contains 459 words, total size 3 kb.

1
The really sick thing is that Left will spin this trial a job-creator for New York.


Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:01 AM (z37MR)

2 and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview.

As opposed to the screamingly apparent competence of the current administration. Right, buddy. Got Unicorn?®

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 07:01 AM (aC0uO)

3 Unfortunately, the jobs created will be in the disaster recovery sector.

Posted by: joncelli at November 18, 2009 07:03 AM (RD7QR)

4 The really sick thing is that Left will spin this trial a job-creator for New York.

Hey, as far as I'm concerned KSM is shovel-ready!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at November 18, 2009 07:03 AM (aC0uO)

5

What annoyed me most about the snippet I saw on Fox News was that Holder said that one of the factors that went into the decision was "the probability of success".

 

KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be?

 

Posted by: Anachronda at November 18, 2009 07:04 AM (1OYcp)

6
Holder has good reason not to be afraid of KSM -- the Bush admin apprehended KSM and he's no longer a threat.

But Holder and Obama are fools for not fearing KSM's legions of followers who are roaming around freely. Holder and Obama are putting the rest of us, (those with no security detail), at great risk.

Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:06 AM (z37MR)

7 What goes unmentioned in the left's clamor to get these monsters up for their show trial is the terrible precedent this sets.

Not for terrorists, necessarily: but for regular Americans.

If the trials are shoo-in show trials (as I think everyone left and right sort of admits), then convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR. By trying them as American civilians, they legitimize military tactics against civilian defendants.

Posted by: DoDoGuRu at November 18, 2009 07:07 AM (Xdxf8)

8

You're missing the point, Drew.

If you handle this in a criminal court, then -- even if he's acquitted -- you can later sue for damages in civil court.

Posted by: FireHorse at November 18, 2009 07:07 AM (Vl5GH)

9

KSM was ready to plead guilty in a military tribunal. How much more successful does he think a civilian trial can be?

Yeah, the successful prosecution of KSM is not what Obama and Holder have in mind. As Rush says, this trial is the prosecution of the United States, George Bush, and Western Civilization.

Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:08 AM (z37MR)

10 Posted by: FireHorse at November 18, 2009 12:07 PM (Vl5GH)

True but then it would take resources away from KSM that he could use to find the 'real terrorists'.

Posted by: DrewM. at November 18, 2009 07:09 AM (FCWQb)

11 Cool , more face time for lawyers on TV.
Can the Obama justice dept. be any more awesome ?

Posted by: awkward davies at November 18, 2009 07:11 AM (wb68R)

12 Contact your elected representatives and raise all holy hell! I heard this morning the Republicans are circulating some legislation to stop this trial from happening. Let's beat Obama and Holder down. The American people are pissed about this!

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:12 AM (Xm1aB)

13

This decision is already biting them in the ass. Today's Rasmussen Daily Presidential tracking poll has the O-hole at -14. http://tinyurl.com/5tnd2b

 

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:12 AM (kn+jW)

14 The fucking pussy ran off to Asia, specifically to avoid the heat over this travesty.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:14 AM (Xm1aB)

15 This is a complete and total joke. The President has already tainted the jury pool by declaring, "I am confident he will be found guilty.", add to that the fact other terrorists are still being tried in military trials. This is nothing but a political farce. Well that pretty much sums up everything this jackass does so why are any of us surprised?

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:14 AM (SqAkN)

16 Attack military personnel=military tribunal. Attack civilians=full blown trial with the same rights as a car thief and a witness stand from which to preach a little jihad. Gee, I wonder who the future targets of terror might be.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (Xm1aB)

17 Imagine getting sat on the jury for this crap? What about the prosecutors safety when he goes home after the trial? What about the judge? How will KSM face his accusers other than calling on the stand CIA employees? This is beyond stupid, this is political and national suicide on TV.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (SqAkN)

18
You know who else Eric Holder isn't afraid of?

The CIA.

I'm just trying figure out how he's gonna juggle both cases without it being politically detrimental to Obama.


Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (z37MR)

19 McCarthy was part of the prosecution of the 1993 WTC bombers.  I believe he knows his shit.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:16 AM (NtiET)

20 What annoyed me most about the snippet I saw on Fox News was that Holder said that one of the factors that went into the decision was "the probability of success".

What bothered me about it was when I turned on Fox to watch a little of it while eating lunch they did the lead in with Lindsey F'kn Graham, friend of the terrorist crapweasel.

I turned it off. The only Republicans Fox puts on with any regularity are Graham and McLame.  Can you say PR for the squishes?

Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 07:17 AM (CDUiN)

21 Where do these Affirmative Action legal beagles come from for god's sake?

Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (mka2b)

22

Everyone on the left seems to think there will not be a plan hatched once KSM and others are imprisoned in the HeartLand. One of the largest vistories for our enemies would be to spring one of these terrorists out of a maximum security prison. I'm glad there is no plans to keep them anywhere near me.

Everyone on the left also seems to think that by not doing this would make us hypocrites. I don't get it. Can somebody please explain that to me?

Posted by: Jimi at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (ZBY0f)

23 The fucking pussy ran off to Asia, specifically to avoid the heat over this travesty.

Brings up an interesting possibility--trial will be conducted sometime after O leaves office?

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:18 AM (NtiET)

24
Will this be televised?

I know COURT TV is gone, but will cameras be allowed in the courtroom? Why do I suspect the Obama admin will try to televise this show trial for all the world to see?

Posted by: goforitbillbelichik at November 18, 2009 07:19 AM (z37MR)

25 Yes Mr. Holder, trying the blind sheik over the first world trade center bombing worked so well at preventing the next. So glad that those perpetrators of man made disasters got the message.

Thanks again FiftyTwo Percenters, you  fucking fucks.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 07:20 AM (erIg9)

26 So, to be clear, the Left is fine with trials when the AG and the President of the United States assure them that the "defendants" will be found guilty?

Nice precedent they're setting, I'll tell you what.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:21 AM (wVPwI)

27 Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any US citizen who steals a car.

Not to mention: Presumption of Innocence.


Posted by: franksalterego at November 18, 2009 07:24 AM (GKyIE)

28 The New Jersey and Virginia elections scared the hell out of the administration.  With "Cap-n-tax" and ObamaCare set to (G*d willing) die a merciful death in Congress and the "stimulus" already a proven failure they realize that they don't have anything to run on in 2010.

The only thing that's worked for them in the past has been to run against GW Bush- so enter the KSM Road Show soon to open for (at least) a full year "It's All Bush's Fault" orgy through the 2010 election cycle.

I used to think Goebbels would be proud of the BO administration, but now I'm not so sure- I'm sure he would be more discreet in his efforts to distract the public.

Posted by: Hannibal Lecter at November 18, 2009 07:24 AM (OtQXp)

29

Just think, this whole debacle could have been prevented if we'd only executed that POS.

It is perfectly legal to do so.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (ZGhSv)

30 Forget get all the bitching about Booosh!1!!.  Shit like this is what will erode the Rule of Law.  Do you know many precedents will be ignored in this farce?  How many statues will be bent? 

Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?

What happens to the case law?  5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial?

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (wVPwI)

31 D@mn sock puppet...

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:25 AM (OtQXp)

32

I am fucking sick of this shit:

"...the Obama administration will acknowledge this war, and it will verge into the national security realism that, while mismanaged and badly represented over the previous eight years, came to be a defining mark of the Bush worldview."

You know what you fucking asshole, it was the fucking media and the fucking Democrats that has passed that totally unjustified judgement on GWB, not the American people!

GWB apparently "bungled" a response to a type of attack that had never before confronted this country, with the "help" of an antagonistic media and a Democrat party that opportunistically jumped ship on him (and us) at the first setback, and yet he managed to stop attacks on us for 8 years.  Some bungler.

Hey Obama, when you learn to "bungle" as well as GWB, maybe you'll be worth more than a bucket of warm spit, but so far you show little promise of pulling it off, Genuflecter-in-Cheif!!

 

ps. FYBO

Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:28 AM (G9/8V)

33

"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"

If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect. This decision can be summed up as Obama going full retard.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at November 18, 2009 07:29 AM (SqAkN)

34 Well, we know that Lynn Stewart won't be able to represent KSM, though she may share a bunk with him!

Posted by: Penfold at November 18, 2009 07:29 AM (lF2Kk)

35 And what happens if any of these cases get thrown out of court on some technicality, like there isn't any evidence other than heresay -- the terrorist walks out into the streets of NY?  or are they deported to where ever they got picked up? Returned to Gitmo?  Given a spot in Obama's Homeland Security? 

Iquiring minds want to know. 

Posted by: drfredc at November 18, 2009 07:30 AM (puRnk)

36 30 Forget get all the bitching about Booosh!1!!.  Shit like this is what will erode the Rule of Law.  Do you know many precedents will be ignored in this farce?  How many statues will be bent? 

Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?

What happens to the case law?  5 years from now, does a defendant in Federal court have to worry what comes out of this trial?

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (wVPwI)

Excellent points all but, in the "judgment" of the administration, they all must be set aside in consideration of the ultimate goal- maintaining power.

And according to their political calculus they need a flashback appearance of the Bush/Cheney bogeyman to hold onto power- rule of law and national security be damned!

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:30 AM (OtQXp)

37 #28

There is a not-miniscule chance that this trial will end in an acquittal for KSM.

If that happens, that's a huge black eye for Obama.

Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:31 AM (PwGfd)

38

In addition to the 10 detainees named Friday, Holder is expected to send others to trials and commissions in the United States.

Another, larger group of detainees is expected to be released to other countries. Some, the president has said, are too dangerous to be released and cannot be put on trial, and those detainees will continue to be imprisoned

i really don't understand this

why commissions for some,  they don't consider ksm dangerous?

Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (GkYyh)

39 I still can't get over the terrorist take away from all this: hit a soft civilian target and get a bullhorn and cushy federal court trial; hit a military target and get a secret commission at Gitmo.  Not a hard choice to make if you're AQ.

Posted by: slade at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (XsHAM)

40 Holder says he is confident he can obtain a conviction. . .
I've heard that before.


Posted by: Orenthal James Simpson at November 18, 2009 07:34 AM (6Q9g2)

41
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground.

Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 07:35 AM (jvrmc)

42

"Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"

If you look at this from a legal standpoint they would pretty much have to let him off. Biased jury pool, the freakin President saying he is guilty and will be found guilty, waterboarding, not read his rights, ect ect.

Exactly, but do you think The Powers That Be will let that happen?  Holder and Obama have publicly promised and guaranteed a conviction.  If they can't deliver, God help us all.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (wVPwI)

43

Meanwhile, terrorists who kill thousands in an act of war are afforded the full panoply of rights and protections as any U.S. citizen who steals a car. 

The car thief stands a better chance getting a longer sentence if convicted, and a better chance of being convicted, than do KSM and friends.

I've had enough liberal pseudo-idealism, how about you?

Posted by: Minnie Rodent at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (PZLW0)

44 WTF? "We will see to it that KSM is afforded the same Rule of Law as ...say, ahm, GM shareholders"-EHolder

Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:36 AM (ABUF9)

45 How long is this show trial going to take?
I'd expect at LEAST a year, longer if either side wants to drag things out further.
That's a potentially long sideshow for the Obama administration to put on.

Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:37 AM (6Q9g2)

46 I heard the KSM and Co. have submitted their applications to the
New Black Panther Party and upon acceptance (them not being white and also down with the struggle) will have all charges dropped.
Then they will be released in either South Chicago or Detroit and issued "Ceremonial" nightsticks.
Problem solved.

Posted by: Hugh Jasteroid at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (lD4DZ)

47
convictions legitimize whatever tactics were taken up until that point. Tactics that are entirely appropriate for illegal enemy combatants caught on the battlefield out of uniform, but not appropriate for American civilians caught with a stolen VCR at a Tea Party Protest

ftfy

If you think they aren't going to justify show-trials against internal dissidents, you must believe in skittles-shitting unicorns.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (Haq+B)

48 Hay, WAIT.  Obama and everyone in his administration is saying that these guys are guilty.   No if's, and's or but's.  Everybody, well almost everybody is some kind of Liberal in NY. Now can he get a fair trial in NY.... Heh,heh,heh.

Posted by: Mystry at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (kmgIE)

49 If that happens, that's a huge black eye for Obama.

I'm not sure an acquittal hurts his standing with anyone who doesn't already despise him.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at November 18, 2009 07:38 AM (NtiET)

50 No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one swift.  Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our age?

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:39 AM (wVPwI)

51 Senator Blowhard: "Mr Holdem, based on your testimony here today, are you fucking high?".

Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:39 AM (ABUF9)

52 Can we start talking about impeachment now?

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (Xm1aB)

53 Evidently Republicans on this committee don't give a damn.

This hearing is a big ZERO.


Posted by: pam at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (h8R9p)

54 Also, if Khalid Sheikh Muhammed is convicted and given the death penalty, how long will he rot on Death Row? What's the average stay, 17 years or something?

Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (AYWcM)

55

I'm not really certain here which would be scarier:  letting KSM walk due to tainted evidence or other technicalities, or being convicted and sentenced in spite of the tainted evidence and other technicalities.

Unless they can drag it out past 2012, which maybe they are planning on, if the POS gets off then Obam'ter and the Dems are done for at least a generation.  If he gets convicted, I think it only proves it was a kangaroo court show trial to begin with.  Either way, these "smart" people in charge are taking one helluva risk, with little upside for reward.

Posted by: JamesLee at November 18, 2009 07:40 AM (GNi4/)

56 It makes no sense, but then I ask myself:  Is Obama stupid enough to risk this all for a chance to have one of the most Hated (with a capital H) men in the world badmouth and whine about George W. Bush and Dick Cheney while in the dock?

The answer is, of course, yes.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (wVPwI)

57 #53 I hope that's not true. I emailed Kit Bond yesterday asking him when we can expect his apology for voting to confirm Holder.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (Xm1aB)

58

(holding nose)  Order in the court!  Please remove the defendant immediately, shave, and bathe him for chrissakes!

Posted by: NYC Judge at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (wAQA5)

59

Separately, a member of the Judiciary committee, Democrat Charles Schumer of New York, is urging the administration to reimburse the city for what he says could be $75 million in extra security costs related to the terror trials.

Breitbart

Posted by: willow at November 18, 2009 07:43 AM (GkYyh)

60 If the defense is granted a change of venue, I hope they move the trial to San Francisco, right in Nancy's backyard.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:44 AM (kn+jW)

61 50 No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one swift.  Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our age?

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (wVPwI)

That would be true if one of the Great Terrorists of our age was on trial.  In reality, thanks to the assistance of the media, GWB, Dick Cheney, the CIA, FBI, and the entire US intelligence community will be on trial- allowing the administration to dredge up all the old worn out "failed policy of the previous administration" rhetoric which is what they need to energize the young voters who stayed home in NJ and Virginia two weeks ago.

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (OtQXp)

62 #49

Obviously there are individuals who are in the tank for Obama, and whose opinion will never change no matter what he does.

But I think if the "mastermind" of 9-11 walks, there is going to be a LOT of anger at the Nobel-Peace prize-winning administration.

Even if it doesn't cause his supporters to drop him, a KSM acquittal will definitely energize his opponents.

Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (PwGfd)

63 I hope the prick walks. I really do. I hope he sues for pain/suffering and buys one of Trumps biggest condos, overlooking the hole he made. Hopefully he'll crap out the window every day. NY'ers are all about the forgiveness (barry and KSM) shit, even when it isn't asked for. Tan up KSM, the souther poverty law center is about to make you rich.

Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (ABUF9)

64 Is the NYC Visitors Bureau kapish with this decision? I won't be traveling there during the trial.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:45 AM (Xm1aB)

65 I predict they drag this out, and it doesn't go to actual trial before the 2012 elections. 

If Obama is re-elected, the trial proceeds apace - because it's outcome doesn't matter politically to him anymore.  If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican.

Posted by: FreakyBoy at November 18, 2009 07:46 AM (4s1it)

66 Folks, the real reason for the decision to use the civilian court instead of a military forum is the left's persistent goal of devaluing the military in general in relation to the civilian in general. This goes all the way back to the Vietnam War. The military is the least left-dominated institution in our society, so it is in the left's interest that it be discredited.

Posted by: sissoed at November 18, 2009 07:47 AM (XpBZo)

67 All KSM's lawyers have to do is get a couple of Muslims on the jury - instant hung jury = aquittal.  No Muslim is going to vote to convict, but plenty will do their best to intimidate the other jurors into letting him off.  Plus, there will be plenty of opportunities to threaten the judge, prosecutors, etc;  Once this circus gets started the international left will say "the poor fellow was tortured, there is no real proof he did anything, let him go." And you can be sure Obama will let him go. 

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (8HaDt)

68 "You know, a ri-yot iss an ugly ting, but I tink it's chust about time ve had vun!!"

Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (G9/8V)

69

pam

I'm afraid Republicans might see a public trial as a gold plated club to beat Democrats with in the coming years and thus may not fight this wholeheartedly

Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (jvrmc)

70

Sofa King and Carpet Demon

 took shelter from the rain.

When Master Bait

showed up late,

he left them with a stain.

Posted by: Max Power at November 18, 2009 07:48 AM (q177U)

71

Many people will probably want to think twice about attending the New Year's Eve celebration in Times Square.  I know I wouldn't.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (kn+jW)

72

If he's defeated, he happily hands one more unfinished huge shit sandwich he made to the incoming Republican.
FreakyBoy at November 18, 2009 12:46 PM

Hell, I don't think barry could survive a primary race with David Duke or Perez Hilton

Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (ABUF9)

73 #69 That's the only upside to the trial moving forward that I've heard mentioned. It's something I guess. Thanks.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:49 AM (Xm1aB)

74

1. Holder gets out there with Obama and say they know KSM is guilty----Mistrial much?

2. We try them in civilian courts if they attack civilians (KSM-WTC) and military courts if they attack the military (Cole bombers) (just forget about the Pentagon) and that tells the terrorists what?    Attack civilians on american soil...you got it.

Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 07:51 AM (twCqO)

75 When,  not if, KSM and his terrorists friends are released in NYC by a democrat/liberal judge will the inept Holder fall on his own sword/hang himself (in shame) or will a survivor/family member of 9-11 have to take him and his family out.

Posted by: Scrapiron at November 18, 2009 07:51 AM (1kwr2)

76 50 No, the Obama Administration has every incentive to make this one swift.  Would you want to go into the mid-term elections still having failed to obtain a "conviction" for one of the Great Terrorists of our age?

First of all, its not up to the Obama administration.  KSM's lawyers and the judge in question will have a say too.   If KSM wants to drag this out he well may get that chance.

Also, if Obama were primarily interested in making this "swift" he could have allowed KSM to plead guilty as he attempted to do last year.


Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 07:53 AM (6Q9g2)

77 Frankly, as long they announce it beforehand, I would prefer the federal court let the bastards walk. I'm sure the NYCPD and NYCFD will have a group of greeters present when they step foot out the courthouse.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:54 AM (Xm1aB)

78 In a civilian trial, America will see KSM for the coward that he is..
Wasn't it Holder that called American's cowards? So,  in his twisted logic, he equates all Americans with KSM. Nice.

Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 07:55 AM (EL+OC)

79

How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers?  Hmmmm?

Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry... capice'?

Posted by: sherlock at November 18, 2009 07:55 AM (G9/8V)

80

I thought one of them said that if he isn't convicted they still won't let him go. So what's the point?

Where do these asswipes get the idea that foreigners get the protection of the US constitution?

Does the loony left think we had sheep herder's children locked up and undergoing torture at Gitmo? What's all the sympathy for? Just US hating?

Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (twCqO)

81 I am sick and tired of hearing Holder call KSM a coward. What the hell makes KSM a coward? Vicious, psycho, violent, etc. yes. Coward not so much.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (Xm1aB)

82 77 Frankly, as long they announce it beforehand, I would prefer the federal court let the bastards walk.

I'm sure the NYCPD and NYCFD will have a group of greeters present when they step foot out the courthouse.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:54 PM (Xm1aB)

Along with high-potency pheremone spray, a prize boar hog, and a camcorder.

For starters...

Definite U-tube moment...

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 07:57 AM (OtQXp)

83

this will not end well

 

the AG and the Present are already on record as guaranteeing convictions- I'm sure KSM's lawyer's first motion will be for for dismissal

Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 08:00 AM (KOkrW)

84 Who wants to be the judge or the appellate court that lets one of The Masterminds of 9/11 off the hook?"

Lifetime appointments makes one a little safer in following your ideological bent, no matter how stupid it may seem to everyone else. E.G., the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Posted by: Mallamutt at November 18, 2009 08:00 AM (V9SYy)

85 #81
Maybe Holder means the term "coward" as a compliment, considering that he called the USA a country of cowards.

#80
You do have to wonder what exactly the Holder "backup plan" is, assuming that KSM is acquitted (which again, is entirely possible).

If they don't intend to let him go, then where are they going to put him?   The new Guantanamo?  If they aren't going to release him after a "not-guilty" verdict, then when will they EVER release him?

Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 08:01 AM (6Q9g2)

86

How's that voting Dem all the time working out for you New Yorkers?  Hmmmm?

Tell you what - elect one single fucking Donkey in 2010, and my reservior of sympathy for you stupid pricks goes bone-dry...

I was born and lived in downstate NY for years. We still have many friends and family that exist there. It's hopeless. Believe me on this one.

Posted by: Barbarian at November 18, 2009 08:02 AM (EL+OC)

87 Oh, have no doubt, there are federal judges with lifetime gigs who wouldn't hesitate to walk these killers if the judge thought it would blacken George W.'s eye. No doubt about it.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:02 AM (Xm1aB)

88 Attack military personnel=military tribunal.

Attack civilians=full blown trial with the same rights as a car thief and a witness stand from which to preach a little jihad.

Gee, I wonder who the future targets of terror might be.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 12:16 PM (Xm1aB)

Attack a Kindergarten = Time out.

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 18, 2009 08:04 AM (xxgag)

89

Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?

If not, what is ther difference.  

Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:04 AM (Vqruj)

90 The jury pool is going to consist of people that still can't figure out what to do with that hole in midtown? Wasn't the last design, under Pataki, shaped like an Islamic Cresent?

Posted by: hutch1200 at November 18, 2009 08:06 AM (ABUF9)

91 89

Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?

If not, what is ther difference.  

Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 01:04 PM (Vqruj)

The only explanation I can come up with is that they started dumping massive doses of Stupid Serum into the drinking water in about 1963.

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 08:07 AM (OtQXp)

92   The Pearl Harbor attackers were uniformed members of the armed forces of a hostile nation.  Had they been captured after being shot down, they'd have been POWs and afforded the proscribed treatment.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:07 AM (wVPwI)

93 #83 the AG and the Present are already on record as guaranteeing convictions- I'm sure KSM's lawyer's first motion will be for for dismissal

They'll ask for a dismissal, but won't get it.

Their #2 motion will be to have the trial taken out of NYC, arguing that the jury pool in New York is tainted because of 9-11.

There is going to be a HUGE fight pre-trial in this case around evidence.   Team KSM is going to try to get ALL of it (much of it classified), and try to use it to embarrass the gov't.  Then Team KSM is going to get as much of it as possible knocked out, claiming it was obtained illegally, under duress from waterboarding, etc.  This discovery fighting will probably drag on for months, with each side appealing and counter-appealing any decision on critical evidence.




Posted by: looking closely at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (PwGfd)

94 I don't care if we have the votes or not. The congressional GOP should develop articles of impeachment alleging, to start, that Obama's administration is, instead of protecting Americans, actively endangering them by 1) transferring Gitmo detainees into the U.S., and 2) holding the KSM trial in NYC. Let's roll!

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (Xm1aB)

95

Attack a Kindergarten = Time out.

Attack a Christian Church = Red carpet treatment at any given Hollywood awards ceremony

Posted by: Alex's Cabin at November 18, 2009 08:09 AM (AYWcM)

96
Rush is reading this thread, apparently.  This case is going to get thrown out, and Wee Wee seems to be working towards that end.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:10 AM (Haq+B)

97 Military tribunals are for Obama administration leakers

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:11 AM (+sBB4)

98 #96 Why? What's up?

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:11 AM (Xm1aB)

99
@Dave

He started this segment with Dagny's #74 almost word for word.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (Haq+B)

100 97 Military tribunals are for Obama administration leakers

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 01:11 PM (+sBB4)

...and CIA interrogators.

Posted by: Nighthawk at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (OtQXp)

101

Doesn't the defence get to choose the jury?  I imagine they can find twelve Muslims without problem.    There's an aquittal right there.

 

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at November 18, 2009 08:14 AM (eNxMU)

102 All it takes is one, single muslim on the jury to prevent a conviction. That's it, just one. Or a terrorist sympathizer.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:16 AM (Xm1aB)

103 94 I don't care if we have the votes or not.

The congressional GOP should develop articles of impeachment alleging, to start, that Obama's administration is, instead of protecting Americans, actively endangering them by 1) transferring Gitmo detainees into the U.S., and 2) holding the KSM trial in NYC.

Let's roll!

^^  This!

Posted by: Derak at November 18, 2009 08:16 AM (0cdUt)

104 84.
The question about judges and prosecutors wasn't about their professional careers.
It was a about their show-biz careers, when they and their families show up on Youtube being beheaded.

Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 18, 2009 08:17 AM (d0ih6)

105 Yeah, you think a juror or two might be concerned about getting the Daniel Pearl treatment if they vote to convict?

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (Xm1aB)

106 If the glove does not fit, you must acquit!  I can see it now.  Victory for Allah.....

Posted by: Todd at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (LLOGQ)

107

>All it takes is one, single muslim on the jury to prevent a conviction.

That's it, just one. Or a terrorist sympathizer.

 

 

or a Truther

or a Bush hater

or a Kos kid

a DUer

a Huffposter

etc etc etc

Posted by: Jones at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (KOkrW)

108 Headline parody: Crime! Declared on al Qaeda: http://tinyurl.com/ydwfczh

Posted by: Justin Camp at November 18, 2009 08:19 AM (nF4Jh)

109 Several have mentioned that it will only take one Muslim on the jury to get it hung. Look at it from the other direction - if there isn't one (or more) on the jury his lawyers will be screaming mistrial for discrimination.

Posted by: Jim at November 18, 2009 08:20 AM (E725N)

110 Oh, Good lord, I hadn't thought of that.

One Truther could cause KSM to walk.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:20 AM (wVPwI)

111 21 Where do these Affirmative Action legal beagles come from for god's sake?

Posted by: kansas at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (mka2b)

The bottom of the barrel - the same place The Precedent is from. And we are really scraping it, now.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:22 AM (A46hP)

112 The Supreme Court has ruled that you may not strike jurors based on their race or gender. What about religion? If I'm a prosecutor in this case, I'm striking every muslim I can. Is this legal?

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:22 AM (Xm1aB)

113 Rush seems to think that the testimony will set Bush/Cheney up to get a indictment for war crimes in an international court and that's the point.

Posted by: dagny at November 18, 2009 08:25 AM (twCqO)

114 One liberal will cause KSM to walk.

hmmm... Now where would they find a liberal in NYC?....

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:25 AM (+sBB4)

115 It's simple:

Obama's mission is to weaken the US. Everything about it, everything that makes it exceptional, everything that makes it the greatest, most successful human experiment ever. He and his handlers want all that gone.

This fucktarded farce of a trial makes things worse any way you slice it. That's not a bug, it's a feature.

He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency.

Yeah. . .it actually happened.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 08:26 AM (yUybe)

116
the testimony will set Bush/Cheney up to get a indictment for war crimes in an international court and that's the point.

That, and every CIA and SF operator we had in-theater.  This is all about justifying 9/11 and putting the U.S. on trial.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:27 AM (Haq+B)

117
He's not stupid, and he's not misguided. He's a thriller-novel anti-American bad guy who won the Presidency.

Yeah. . .it actually happened.

Yup.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Haq+B)

118

Techie, how is that different?  Are you suggesting that Japanese who WERE wearing uniforms should be treated worse than Muzztards who weren't?

Those who do not wear uniforms are customarily executed summarily.

Posted by: gus at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Vqruj)

119 #113 Whose testimony? The terrorists'? Who cares? And any American agent who thinks he might be prosecuted for "torture" or whatever will claim the 5th. Gosh, I wish I could listen to Rush today.

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:28 AM (Xm1aB)

120

Terrorists on trial:

Miami (AP) A Miami man convicted of plotting to destroy Chicago's Sears Tower and bomb FBI offices has been sentenced to six years in federal prison.

U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard imposed the sentence Wednesday on 24-year-old Burson Augustin.

Prosecutors sought the maximum 30-year sentence for Augustin. Lenard ruled that sentencing terrorism enhancements should not apply to Augustin, who was not the leader.

The men were convicted in May of supporting Al-Qaida, conspiring to wage war on the U.S. and other charges. There were two mistrials, and two other men were acquitted. All denied plotting terror attacks.

Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 08:30 AM (1Jaio)

121 112 The Supreme Court has ruled that you may not strike jurors based on their race or gender.

What about religion? If I'm a prosecutor in this case, I'm striking every muslim I can.

Is this legal?

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 01:22 PM (Xm1aB)

No. They can't reject a juror just for religion - especially seeing how the feral government (and others) have just gone out of their way to claim that screaming, "Allahu akhbar!" before spraying unarmed people with bullets serves no indication of any ties to jihadism ... but, given that just about everyone in New York was there for 9/11, it would be immensely easy to ask some questions that would show bias and, thus, reject whatever jurors they want "for cause".

The problem, of course, is that we would normally think that the prosecuting attorney would be the one looking to strike muslims, liberals, and other terrorist sympathizers from the jury, but the sad fact is that the prosecuting attorney and the whole of the feral government's executive branch ARE terrorist sympathizers (and worse, even) and they are going to be the ones happy to stack the jury with muslims and terror lovers. Holder will explain it by saying that he is not scared of having 6 muslims on the jury.

The only solution this nation has is to forcibly eject The Precedent, Holder, and the whole fetid administration - to then prosecute all of them for treason and various other crimes against the nation. Barring that ... we are just f#cked. Look forward to a split in the nation, because that is the only light left at the end of this tunnel of stupidity and America-hate and the only way to preserve the American creed.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:30 AM (A46hP)

122 Jon Kyle said KSM has already plead guilty and is seeking the death penalty in a military tribunal.  How could he be "more likely" to get death penalty in NYC?

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:32 AM (+sBB4)

123 "How could you be more likely to get a conviction in a civilian court than in a military court when Khalid Sheik Mohammad has already pled guilty and asked for the death penalty before a military commission?"

- Jon Kyle

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:33 AM (+sBB4)

124 Yeah. . .it actually happened.

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at November 18, 2009 01:26 PM (yUybe)

Yep, it did.

I would just disagree with you on one part - The Precedent is stupid. He's just lucky that any fool can destroy a complex system, especially one that has been put on the very edge of destruction as the monetary crisis has done to us. It wouldn't be tough for a 12 year old to run an aircraft carrier aground, if you gave him the helm, especially if he wanted to and if he staffed the ship with the same sort of useful idiots who populate the feral government - people who think that grounded aircraft carriers are better because you don't have to worry about navigating them and all that difficult stuff.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 08:35 AM (A46hP)

125
Has anyone mention AG Holder is a c*cksucker yet?  Cuz he really, really is, you know.

Posted by: Dang Straights at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (Haq+B)

126 I hope this is the end, my heart can't take the destruction of America any longer...Obama suck scock

Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (LLOGQ)

127 Holder is a snake.

Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 08:37 AM (dQdrY)

128 Only in NYC would useful idiots put a rapist next door to the victim then pride themselves about how they show the world their compassion.

I feel violated and raped all over again; I cannot wait to get the hell out of this miserable freak show called NYC.

Mayor Mommy-Nanny could have said NO but he cares more about protecting rapists than he does for those who have been raped.

Dear NYC FREAKS-

I lived here for 20 years, paid a shit-load of taxes, put up with endless lairs wearing smiley-faces and when I leave my only wish to you is may you forever rot away in your own freak show sewer.

Sincerely
a former brain-dead liberal whose veil of provincial myopia slipped away while  watching the WTC crumble into ash on 9-11-2001.

Posted by: syn at November 18, 2009 08:39 AM (ZjEOd)

129 Look, the fact of the matter is that a growing portion of America is not going to stand much longer Obama's constant attack on our freedoms, and security. Impeachment needs to be on the table, now!

Posted by: Dave at November 18, 2009 08:39 AM (Xm1aB)

130 If I capture someone in Afghanistan, do I read him his rights?

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:40 AM (+sBB4)

131

The AG going on record presuming guilt is not a big deal,isn't every prosecutor confident the defendant is guilty?It's the president coming out with the presumption of guilt that is absolutely mind boggling

Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 08:43 AM (jvrmc)

132 This is so totally insane, we need to investigate Holder's Black Muslim connections.

Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 08:46 AM (dQdrY)

133 I'm afraid I don't follow you, gus.

Should the Pearl Harbor attackers have been afforded America rights,
American lawyers, American legal protections and American criminal court trials?

If not, what is ther difference.  


The Pearl Harbor attackers were the Japanese Navy.  I fail to see how they are equivalent to Al Queda.  You can't and don't put POWs on trail.  It'd be idiotic.

Whom you DO put on trail are spies and saboteurs.

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:47 AM (wVPwI)

134

So, if they let this piece of shit go, where would they release him? Pakistan?

And what is going to stop KSM from trying to represent himself using the courtroom as his personal soap box to recite the Koran?

Posted by: Todd the guy who hate muslims, all muslims at November 18, 2009 08:49 AM (LLOGQ)

135 I can see the headline now:

"KSM acquitted of terrorism charges; convicted of contempt of court"

Posted by: Techie at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (wVPwI)

136

This sets so much bad precedent on so many levels; all of them stated above.  This could change the ROE in such a way as to make the prosecution of the war more dangerous and less successful for our military.  This puts the conviction of terrorists within question, which is utter bs.  This puts the civilian population at risk (intimidating/influencing the jury/jusry pool perhaps? yeah, I think so).  It sets the precedent for using military tactics on ordinary American civilians -- this is a biggie to me.  The list goes on and on.

This isn't about prosecuting terrorists; this is about trying to set precedent for future control of the populace.  And it's a nasty piece of work all around.

Posted by: unknown jane at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (5/yRG)

137 If they let KSM go, they will have to put Holder and Obama in Witness Protection.

Posted by: wHodat at November 18, 2009 08:50 AM (+sBB4)

138 @130, after discharging your clip into his chest.

Posted by: Mike H at November 18, 2009 08:53 AM (cvvNY)

139 Here's the thing, this violates the precious Geneva conventions.

All of that international crap that the Left loves is being stood on its head.

If KSM is a soldier, then he is a POW and we can hold him until the end of hostilities but we cannot interrogate him in any serious way.

If KSM is a terrorist waging war on the US, then he is treated as either a pirate or a spy.

If KSM is a civilian with legal residence in the US, then he is a criminal subject to the US justice system.

But there is nothing in international law or even US law that allows us to kidnap someone from another country, bring him to the US for a civilian trial and put him in a civilian jail.

I am surprised the Left is still defending this.  There must be some lefty (Hitchens?) for whom this stinks.  We are seeing the moral preening of the Left laid bare.

Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 08:53 AM (T0NGe)

140 There's exactly one question that can even conceivably be adjudicated in civilian courts: "Are you a member of AQ?"

If you're trying guys with "exceptions to the normal rules", like habeus corpus, Miranda, etc - then you're diluting those self-same protections for the rest of us. "He's a terrorist, we can skimp on..." There have been a couple of crazies that have been charged under "terrorism" laws when more ordinary charges would have applied previous to 2001.

Add this to the freaking insanity of Janet's predilection of feeling tea parties are terrorists - or at least terrorist sympathizers.

This entire approach is fraught from start to finish.

And that's ignoring "What do you do with an openly avowed AQ member that simply shoots a serviceman in a combat zone?"

You aren't going to get convictions for "murder" on a regular basis. Essentially because "defending the homeland" is a pretty reasonable application of self-defense. We don't actually -see- this very often as we haven't historically crossed civilian and war courts very much. But avoiding this crossing is actually the central tenet of the origins of the original freaking Geneva Convention.

Posted by: Al at November 18, 2009 08:59 AM (VtygY)

141 I can see a lot of prisoners in the future being shot trying to escape before our soldiers can get them back to base.

Posted by: wrg at November 18, 2009 09:11 AM (7t+Ws)

142 Let's see, McCarthy prosecuted terrorists while Holder approved their pardons for political purposes and made his money with a white shoe firm that worked on their behalf "pro bono" ie. pro-ME retainers.  The latter, obviously, has much more credibility on the issue.  

Posted by: ed at November 18, 2009 09:22 AM (Urhve)

143

Amal Abusumayah was paying for groceries at the Jewel store at 17117 S. Harlem Ave. in Tinley Park on Nov. 7 when she felt a sharp tug on her headscarf. When she looked at who had pulled her hijab, she saw a woman who moments before had made a derogatory comment about Islam.

On Wednesday, Tinley Park police announced that Valerie Kenney, 54, has been charged with a hate crime, a felony that carries a possible sentence of up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $25,000.

"I was shaken up," Abusumayah told the SouthtownStar about the Nov. 7 assault. "This is my dignity and this is my religion."

Ahmed Rehab of the Chicago chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said his organization has reached out to the FBI to pursue federal charges.

I see. Killing 13 people while shouting Allah Akbar is nothing more than a stress related incident and tugging on a scarf is a case for the FBI.

Posted by: TheQuietman at November 18, 2009 09:35 AM (1Jaio)

144 41
I think this proves what we have known all along,Obama's law degree from Harvard is nothing more than a affirmative action certificate of participation.The guy doesn't know his as from a hole in the ground.

Posted by: bulwark at November 18, 2009 12:35 PM (jvrmc)

Look: an Ivy League law degree either means (1) you scored great on the LSAT or (2) you are eligible for affirmative action.

That's it.  Once you're in, there's no failure.  None at all.  Yale doesn't have grades, FGS.  When you're accepted, they print your diploma.

This is also the approach we get when lawyers run our system.  There are some good lawyers, but they don't think like lawyers.  Look at Lindsay Graham.  He's a lawyer, so he approaches all problems this way, that the justice system is the answer to all of life's problems.

Posted by: AmishDude at November 18, 2009 09:36 AM (T0NGe)

145 I've been a proponent for years of making NYC a state, and to cut them off from Upstate.


Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Wicked High Temps in the Core of the Earth at November 18, 2009 10:16 AM (erIg9)

146 Transparently the purpose of the "Show Trial" is to allow KSM to serve Obama & Eric Holder's agenda with attacks on Bush's handling of terrorists while preventing Bush/Cheney from defending themselves because that defense, of policies still in effect, will be up to Eric Holder.

Posted by: DANEgerus at November 18, 2009 10:58 AM (LMi2C)

147 Posted by: DANEgerus at November 18, 2009 03:58 PM (LMi2C)

Yes. The important part for people to remember is that the prosecution is working for the defense, and both are working against America. What we have is a "hostile prosecutor". Of course, most of us knew this when Holder was up for confirmation. All of the GOP slime who voted to confirm that dirtball should be tossed out and shunned, relegated to living on the streets where they belong, the scumbags.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at November 18, 2009 11:22 AM (A46hP)

148 I've been a proponent for years of making NYC a state, and to cut them off from Upstate.

What, and give them two more liberal Senators?

Posted by: Vic at November 18, 2009 11:32 AM (CDUiN)

149 I'm a recent proponent of making Texas a nation...again.

Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 12:18 PM (dQdrY)

150

Holder: "I am not scared of KSM." 

How convienient, especially when you weren't the one who put yourself in harm's way to get the bastard. That was done by the CIA, the very agency you want to vicariously put on trial.

Suckwad.

Posted by: SFC MAC at November 18, 2009 12:25 PM (cuNX0)

151

 We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations.

Would these be the same CIA interrogations the current regime insists didn't uncover any relevant information? The ones Cheney said worked and Douchebag said didn't? None of that information would be admissible in a real court because he was under duress. This guy should be tried by a military tribunal and then hung. We did the same things to Germans in the same city in WW2. I had to laugh the other night because Bob Beckel on Hannity asked what would you do if Germans sabatoged something and Hannity gave him a pass on it. We already have precedent for this type of action. This guy was caught on a battlefield in civilian clothes. The Geneva Convention is very clear about what rights this murderer has. NONE! 

Posted by: Bill R. at November 18, 2009 12:39 PM (EhlQq)

152 It'd be nice if the Ivy Leaguers would just admit they view The Law as a toy, and means of totalitarian control. Justice has little to do with it in their hands.

Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at November 18, 2009 12:44 PM (dQdrY)

Posted by: jason at November 18, 2009 04:32 PM (fRLM+)

154 Your article very interesting, I have introduced a lot of friends look at this article, the content of the articles there will be a lot of attractive people to appreciate, I have to thank you such an article
Festival Museum Nusantara
Khairuddin syach Lahat
Matt Khay
Info Pendidikan
Just Khay
Just Khay

Posted by: Iklan Baris Gratis at March 14, 2010 01:39 PM (8/od3)

155 Good assures us that Holder understands we are at war because

Posted by: sorry at March 29, 2010 06:58 AM (VNfTE)

156 Nice post about trials for terrorists . I like your blog very much because it has very interesting articles of different topics like 220-701 dumps, 220-701 free dumps and 220-702 dumps and their tips and tricks. I am a very big googler and search on different topics. Between searching i found your nice blog. Thanks for your this great blog.

Posted by: amery buck at March 30, 2010 04:26 AM (i2nYc)

157 ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable  hosting packages to customers. cheap hosting company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. windows vps  Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customer price.

Posted by: Mark at May 06, 2010 07:22 AM (6DZhO)

158 Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me! I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my
visitors will find that very useful.

vps hosting | hosting | ucvhost

Posted by: Herry at July 08, 2010 07:04 AM (tliCy)

159 Exclusive of site with wholesale blankets,info, it was gratifying to me.Very  outstanding website.I am definitely bookmarking this page and sharing it with my friends.Keep working, great job, I love it! Thanks!fleece throws,Keep making them!Looking forward to future posts. blanket wholesale,This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. wholesale fleece blankets, I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!

Posted by: blankets at September 27, 2010 01:13 AM (0q8av)

160 Today,I am very gald to see this wonderful article.It reminds me of something related.Such as you can find in the following website. www.newgoin.com Where you can find what you want at best price. Ladies and gentleman,please don't hesitated to click it.www.newgoin.com Thousands of brand handbags shoes and high-heel shoes are waiting for you. Free shipping! Paypal accept!

Posted by: Anonymous at September 29, 2010 08:25 AM (fgLcB)

161 breitling superocean watches wholesale cartier watches impression that you are wearing original ones fake romain jerome watches cartier baignoire watches.

Posted by: auto at October 22, 2010 12:29 AM (ygYRs)

162 montblanc watches fake jaeger lecoultre watches for sale the Internet and some are automatic which means replica panerai watches for sale lv classic watches.

Posted by: franck at November 20, 2010 05:26 AM (TdD91)

163 “ ======== http://www.yessoso.com/ ======== http://www.yessoso.com/ We need your support and trust!!! Dear friends, please temporarily stop your footsteps To our website Walk around A look at Maybe you'll find happiness in your sight shopping heaven and earth You'll find our price is more suitable for you. Welcome to our website http://www.yessoso.com/ Thanks to the support! http://www.yessoso.com/ >>>- I love you! ---->” \\

Posted by: shixian at January 15, 2011 10:19 PM (1FYRm)

164   This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free.embroidery Digitizing,I am definitely bookmarking this page and sharing it with my friends.embroidery designs,Thank for this great post, i like what you read.I will give it to my friends. I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, Just want to say what a great blog you got here!but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work! Thumbs up, Digitizing,and keep it going!"I am not scared of KSM." Submitting a war criminal to a military commission is not an exercise in fear; it is an exercise in justice. We already know all about what kind of animal KSM is, thanks to the exrtraordinary information that has come out in the military proceedings and the CIA interrogations. You could fill a book a book with it, which the 9/11 Commission did. We don't need to bear the risks of a civilian trial either to learn more about KSM or so Mr. Holder can show how brave he is.

Posted by: advertizing digitizing at January 31, 2011 01:27 AM (mBhkk)

Posted by: หนังโป๊ออนไลน์ at February 23, 2011 08:36 AM (bq6Qj)

166 Hello, everybody, the good shoping place Welcome to: http://www.yessoso.com/ We specialized in the exportation of sport shoes and other products(clothing, bag,sunglasses,watches,belts,etc )which have great enjoyed popularty in the world market Many of our goods are on sales ,we can guarantee the crediblity by Pay-pal and delivery time .we would like to make a long termship. http://www.yessoso.com/ c.l.o.t.h.i.n.g,j.e.a.n,,h.a.n.d.b.a.g,(f.r.e.e)s.h.i.p.p.i.n.g Cheap Sweater >>>------I love you! ----> http://www.yessoso.com/ Believe you will love it. Accept paypal or credit card and free shipping.

Posted by: Anonymous at March 01, 2011 07:33 PM (wW3uo)

Posted by: idm ถาวร at March 07, 2011 07:23 AM (24/6c)

168 In the case of building a comprehensive tiffany jewelry group, it usually is smart to choose a massive amount expensive jewelry. 100 % danger-free types of tiffany co jewelry jewelry are made for various occasions. One example is, jewellry are really good gems to get, you can't use them almost every occasion. They are really appropriate choice for additional formal events that include weddings or corporate functions. Nevertheless, these events most likely are not that frequent. In order that the chance for wearing diamonds may just be limited.

Posted by: tanisha1987 at March 09, 2011 03:36 AM (oYR1q)

169 Well done, thak you for your great posts, i learned more from here.

Posted by: ipod to mac at April 06, 2011 06:55 AM (kfyJW)

Posted by: asus vh242h at May 24, 2011 04:44 AM (bPnJP)

Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:56 AM (5a2XP)

Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 12:58 AM (5a2XP)

Posted by: asdf at July 06, 2011 01:00 AM (5a2XP)

174 I am so lucky to read your post!thank you!

Posted by: คลิบงูกินคน at July 17, 2011 07:11 PM (IwD23)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at August 06, 2011 12:50 AM (JcxoV)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at December 18, 2011 02:58 PM (y7lGT)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 07, 2012 09:34 PM (M7WRF)

178

Various discount northface jackets online for women and men in our northface outlet. Top quality and latest style North Face Jackets for men, women and kids. this is good choice to choose for chrismas gift.

Posted by: discount north face jackets at January 13, 2012 09:18 PM (I38MY)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 14, 2012 09:06 AM (Ny8Th)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 22, 2012 09:51 PM (ZUGtt)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 25, 2012 02:56 AM (xA1c1)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at January 27, 2012 12:57 PM (L0M88)

Posted by: คําพูดโดนๆ at February 02, 2012 02:15 PM (525qI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






170kb generated in 0.1918 seconds; 50 queries returned 314 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.